Share, , , Google Plus, Reddit, Pinterest, StumbleUpon

Print

Posted in:

Five Cent Cine At Home: The Painted Bird

Eastern European nightmare

A boy of about 9 is separated from his family, moving from one adult to another, from one isolated dwelling or village to another, in a desperate two-year effort to survive. Stripped of name and family, the child experiences life as a series of horrors that include animal torture, sexual abuse, assaults and attempted assaults, murder and attempted murder—of him and others. At one point he’s buried up to his neck, helpless as large black birds peck at his head. Slowly the black-and-white film reveals that the setting, so primitive it could be the Middle Ages, is Eastern Europe in 1944 and 1945, although the war is simply one of many threats to the young protagonist’s existence.

“The Painted Bird” is an indictment of racism, religion, ignorance, superstition, and intolerance, presenting them as facets of a malign culture. The boy, who wanders into farms and villages seeking shelter and sustenance, is viewed in those locales as the other, a dark-haired, darker-skinned person—perhaps a Gypsy or a “dirty Yid”—with “the eyes of black demons.” His nemeses are all blue-eyed.

He’s taken in by a witch, who starts to tutor him in her craft, and by a priest, who starts to tutor him in Catholicism. Rather than being avenues to salvation, witchcraft and religion are treated as equivalents, markers of inhumanity.

The lessons acquired by this young Job are brutal instructions in survival. He accommodates himself to those who condemn and hate him, and profit from his labor. He also learns to kill, steal, and seek revenge.

The lessons acquired by this young Job are brutal instructions in survival.

Compared to the unending assaults on him and others, the moments of kindness the boy experiences are few. The ineffectual priest (played against type by Harvey Keitel, “The Irishman,” 2019) and a German soldier (Stellan Skarsgård, “Breaking the Waves,” 1996) are exceptions to the menacing and uncaring adults he encounters.

The strength of “The Painted Bird”—despite an unending series of horrific incidents in almost 3 hours—is its restraint. Its black and white palette, horizontal long shots, and wide-screen format, present an enormous landscape in which a small human must seek help.

The boy seems mute, although there are hints that he might speak and write. He plays the piano briefly early in the film, and he utters one line, his only one, to a horse. In a final scene, we learn his name, Joska, and that he can write it. Most of those around him in the countryside also have limited language, making the film a meditation not only on inhumanity but also on communication. The lack of explanatory language by any of the characters emphasizes the naivete of the boy as he begins his journey and forces the viewer to participate in imagining the missing reasoning—or lack of it.

The ravages wreaked by World War II combatants marauding through the countryside are shown quickly. Like the local peasantry, we are often ignorant of what side people are on and even who they are: German soldiers, Nazis, Russian regulars, Cossacks, villagers, Catholics, Jews? Most of the villagers seem unaffected by the warring Soviets and Germans; their lives are barely sustainable even without war.

The Holocaust enters the film indirectly. Here, too, Czech Director Václav Marhoul (“Tobruk,” 2008) requires us to apply our own understanding to this inhumane world, to come to see the boy’s experiences as the grounding for the Holocaust—to comprehend how its vile theories and actions could have taken root in these Eastern European cultures.

The acting, including several cameo appearances, is uniformly excellent. In addition to a riveting, silent performance by the young Petr Kotlár and appearances by Keitel and Skarsgård, the international cast includes Barry Pepper as the Russian sniper Mitka (also a sniper in “Saving Private Ryan,” 1998), and two horror/bad guy character actors who make indelible marks: Udo Kier as the sadistic miller (recently seen in “Bacurau,” 2019) and Julian Sands (“Warlock,” 1989) as the pedophile Garbos.

Eleven years in the making, the production is Czech Republic/Slovakian/Ukrainian because Poland refused to have anything to do with it.

“The Painted Bird” is based on Jerzy Kosinski’s controversial 1965 novel of the same name. Eleven years in the making, the production is Czech Republic/Slovakian/Ukrainian because Poland refused to have anything to do with it. The events are not, as Kosinski had claimed for decades, autobiographical. The trials of Joska may track events in the life of his friend, the filmmaker Roman Polanski, who as a child survived much of World War II on his own.

The title of both the book and the film is based on an incident: a man who makes a living capturing and selling wild birds paints one and frees it to join the flock, watching with pleasure as the flock pecks to death the unfamiliar bird, the one who looks and smells differently. The boy picks up and pets the dead bird. Even if horrific and lengthy, with no uplifting message (it’s notable for people who have walked out during a showing), “The Painted Bird,” a film about demonizing the “other,” could not be more relevant to the present moment.


Availability: Rental, Amazon, Google Play and elsewhere; see JustWatch here.

Date: 2019 (July 17 2020 US)

Stars: 3.5 (out of 4 stars)

Director: Václav Marhoul

Starring: Petr Kotlár, Stellan Skarsgård, Harvey Keitel, Udo Kier, Julian Sands, Barry Pepper

Country: Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine

Language: Czech, German, Russian, Latin, and a made-up mix of Eastern European languages; Subtitles: You may need to add your own in English from your device.

Awards: 9 awards at the Czech Lions, UNICEF award at the Venice Film Festival, numerous other nominations and awards.

Runtime: 169 minutes


Also see reviews on…

Moonlight

Toy Story 4

The Truth

I, Tonya

Bacurau

The Shape of Water

Shoplifters

Da 5 Bloods

Marshall

Mudbound

Tommaso

If Beale Street Could Talk

“L’Innocente”

I Am Not Your Negro

The Painter and The Thief

Bad Times at the El Royale

Bad Education

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri

Manchester by the Sea

Until The Birds Return

Sing

Two Popes

Can You Ever Forgive Me?

The Lighthouse

Eighth Grade

The Traitor (Il Traditore)

Free Solo

Never Rarely Sometimes Always

Sorry to Bother You

Midsommar

Hidden Figures

Ford v Ferrari

Captain Fantastic

First Cow

Seberg

Ordinary Love

Portrait of a Lady on Fire

Uncut Gems

Les Misérables

The Last Black Man in San Francisco

Bombshell

1917

Little Women

Marriage Story

Queen & Slim

The Irishman

Roma

Cold Brook

Jojo Rabbit

Pain & Glory ( Dolor y Gloria)

Joker

Parasite

Downton Abbey

Ad Astra

Once Upon A Time In Hollywood

The Goldfinch

Good Boys

Written by 2 Film Critics

2 Film Critics

William Graebner is Emeritus Professor of History, State University of New York, Fredonia, where he taught courses on film and American culture. He is the author or co-author of 11 books and more than 50 scholarly articles, including essays on “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre,” “McCabe and Mrs. Miller,” “The Poseidon Adventure,” and zombie films as they relate to the Holocaust. Dianne Bennett, the first woman to head a large U.S. law firm, is a retired U.S. tax lawyer.

Dianne and Bill were early and passionate attendees at the Toronto Film Festival, and today enjoy the film scenes of Los Angeles, Rome, London, and Buffalo, New York. They began reviewing films for the Rome-based website “TheAmerican/inItalia” in 2016, have maintained a blog on Rome for a decade, and published two alternative guidebooks to the Eternal City. They still can’t resist going to the movies, not to mention the ensuing discussions, sometimes heated, over a bottle of Arneis at the nearest wine bar.

​And that's just the beginning of our reviewing process. For one or two hours we discuss the film, as one of us takes notes. The notetaker transcribes the notes and prints two copies. Dianne or Bill (usually depending on who had the most compelling understanding of the film, or who was most taken with it) writes the first draft of the review--supposedly taking into account the views of the other--which is followed by 3, 4, or even 7 more drafts. At some point, sometimes days later, when we're both comfortable with the result (or accepting of it, anyway), it's done.

https://www.2filmcritics.com

View All Articles by 2 Film Critics
Hide Comments
Show Comments