Fashion Maniac: Keeping tabs on Buffalo’s fashion industry, including models, catwalks, retailers, designers, stylists, visual merchandisers and jewelers.
Gendered Fashion, Power, and Sexuality: A History of Lingerie
Article by Phillip Johnson | Photos by Cheryl Gorski
This past fashion week (the spring/summer 2012 collections shown at Lincoln Center, London, Milan, Paris) revealed a definite lingerie influence, especially Prada, Dolce & Gabanna, and other designers from all four fashion capitals. In New York City, the usual suspects – Betsey Johnson, Anna Sui, The Lake and the Stars, Degan, and Libertine – all showed fun and fabulous pieces influenced by lingerie styles. Other designers that touched on that trend included Charlotte Ronson, Badgley Mischka, Porter Grey, Richard Chai, Custo Barcelona, Libertine, Jeremy Scott, Katie Gallagher, Luca Luca, Tracy Reese, Degan, The Blonds – especially the Blonds. And Tracy Reese. Just to be sure, it may the fall/winter shows that are going on right now in New York City but, yes, the trend still holds. Lingerie rules.
Currently, there are lingerie styles for all situations and intentions, including lingerie that is padded, gel-filled, air-filled, strapless, and backless. Also offered are the sexy thongs, teddy, chemise and peignoir, as well as a plethora of everyday bras and panties. Contemporary lingerie can be whatever women wants it to be. From “grannie panties” to G-strings to fetish wear, women have more choices than ever before than in any other time in history.
When people think of lingerie, they think of prim and proper women in Victorian times who hid their womanly form from the eyes of polite society under layers and layers of outerwear to pop superstar emiritus Madonna prancing around the stage wearing a cone bra creation from Jean-Paul Gaultier. But really, it’s so much more than that. From the Old French linge, meaning “linen,” the term “lingerie” was originally introduced into the English language as a euphemism for scandalous underclothing. While the actual term “lingerie” was not in widespread use until the late 1850s, lingerie as it implies general underclothing has had a rich and elaborate history that consistently switches between the feminine and boyish as well as the painful and practical. From the laced corset “wasp waists” and “false buttocks” to the uplifted (and seriously enhanced) busts of some of the early 1990 supermodels, lingerie has helped define what it means to look beautiful while at the same time revealing a great deal – and sometimes not so much – about a society’s cultural and political values. The history of lingerie, then, is a history of gendered fashion, power, and sexuality.
It is impossible to say exactly when the history of lingerie started, but it would seems that the first record comes from ancient Egypt around 3000 B.C. In general, clothing was a status symbol for the Egyptians, and higher-ranking women would wear narrow tunics as undergarments that started below the chest, extended to the ankles, and were supported by a crosswise shoulder strap. Sometimes they would draw tunics around to the front of the body to mold the waist. As always in life, membership has its privileges. Slave and servants wore no undergarments; they wore only simple loin cloths or went naked.
Several female figurines found throughout the ancient Near East on archeological digs appear to wear several different types of undergarments. One of them is a Babylonian girl from about 3000 B.C. who is wearing what might be considered briefs that look as though it could have been derived from the loin cloth. Another female figure from 2000 B.C., found in Crete, depicts the first recorded corset-like bodice and crinoline (a caged or hoped underskirt) that shoves the bare breast upward. Both are interesting in that they show similarities to lingerie eons later in the western world.
In Classical Greece, several female statues were sculpted wearing a crossed band over their shoulders and across the breast, as in the famous statue of the charioteer at Delphi. The Odyssey and Iliad mention women’s undergarments, as does Herodotus, Aristophanes, and the later Hellenistic writer Lacian. In these texts, women are described as wearing a band of linen known as the zoné around the waist and lower torso to shape and control them. Other Greek words also appear to describe women’s undergarments, including the apodesmos (meaning a band, breast band, or girdle), mastodeton (or breast band, which actually flattens the bust) and, occasionally, mastodesmos (with a similar meaning). These garments appear to pre-date the bra as well as the corset.
Roman women followed Greek fashion closely. The Roman poet Martial describes a cestus, which is similar to the Greek zoné but wider, and Cicero also mentions a strophium or breast band. Other Roman terms describing women’s underclothing include the mamillere and fascia, which were tight bands of cloth that primarily supported the bust rather than the abdomen. A famous mosaic from A.D. 400 shows several women wearing what appear to be bikinis or briefs. For both the Greeks and the Romans, underclothing (which sometimes was worn as outer clothing as well) was designed more for function than exclusively aesthetic reasons.
We then fast forward to the the Middle Ages, where the women of nobility wore linen clothes under expensive outer dresses to both protect their expensive clothes from dirty bodies and to provide a layer of warmth. Most noticeably, two enduring pieces of lingerie, the chemise (or smock) and later the corset, were introduced in the fourth and sixteenth centuries A.D., respectively; with the chemise looking like a tunic that was gathered into a square or circular neck and was frequently embroidered. Typically women wore a chemise under petticoats and later corsets.
The prototype of the first “corset” appears in a twelfth-century manuscript. This manuscript included a depiction of the devil or “fiend of fashion,” represented as a woman. The figure wore a tight-fitting bodice extending from the shoulder to below the waist and closely laced up in the front. While the figure is most likely wearing a tight-fitting bodice rather than a corset in its technical sense, the manuscript is notable in showing the increasing focus on displaying the body. In contrast to ancient dress, modern fashion as it emerged from Medieval Europe concerned itself with tailored clothing designed to follow the shape of the body, and women (as well as men) used tight-fitting undergarments to manipulate the shape of their bodies. For example, during the fourteenth century, women began wearing stiff linen under their bodice called a cotte, an early French word meaning “rib,” that flattened the breast. Woman used paste as stiffener between the two layers of linen to create a stiffer, harder bodice, creating the earliest form of the corset (Steele 2001).
During the mid- and late-1500s skirts began to be made enormous by a “farthingale.” There were two types of farthingales, the Spanish and the French. The Spanish version probably started out as a petticoat that was “boosted” by a series of graduated, corded hoops made out of cane, wire, or whalebone that accentuated a woman’s child-bearing attributes. During the late 1570s, the French version was introduced and it is the farthingale that is seen in many portraits of Queen Elizabeth. It consisted of a vast horizontal hoop worn at the waist but tilted down at the front to accommodate the elongated front of the stiffened bodice. Some women of the Elizabethan era wore a roll or sausage of stiffened material known as a “bum roll” around their waist and under their skirts to hold them out; while fifteenth-century women also wore a “basquine” or “vasqine,” a laced bodice that a hooped skirt or farthingale was attached to.
But then, nothing since then has effected women’s lives and their clothing choices as much as the corset. (The corset was a major component of the cone-shaped bra that Madonna wore during her epic 1980’s international concert tour.) The corset is arguably the most controversial garment in the entire history of fashion. The corset was officially introduced when women began inserting rigid materials such as whalebone into the “busk” or “basque” of cloth bodices in the late sixteenth century (the 1500s). The basque was a slot down the center front of the corset that was thicker at the top than at the bottom and could extend from above the bust to the waist. It was sometimes decorated with amorous images and phrases and was often used as a lover’s token.
During that time, the corset was often referred to as a “stay,” meaning “support,” perhaps implying the female body was naturally weak. Scholars often argued that the corset was a double-edged sword, in that it was used as a status symbol of the corset and as well for its erotic appeal in the way it exaggerates the curves of a woman by making the breasts and hips protrude in an hourglass shape. The lacing of the corset is also often symbolic of sexual intercourse, and some theorists argue that the corset was a surrogate for the body itself. The corset has had many dissenters ranging from doctors who argued the corset was responsible for causing miscarriages and deformities to feminists who argue the corset effectively repressed and victimized women.
The French Revolution in the late 1700s also revolutionized women’s lingerie in a truly, do I sar
e say it “revolutionary” way. French women begin discarding petticoats, corsets, and camisoles as symbols of French aristocracy in favor of the “un-corset,” or a type of corset without stiffening. In a deliberate return to classic Greece, the birthplace of the freedom that revolutionary France was proclaiming, women sometimes would wear a band wrapped around the body similar to the Greek zoné under slim, high-waisted muslins that echoed Grecian rounded breasts and well-rounded figures (Ewing 1972).
The 1800s marked the end of the Napoleonic wars and sadly the return of the boned corset. The high-waisted neoclassical dress with no stays was regarded as being part of the discord and promiscuity of the revolutionary era and, consequently, corseted fashion again surged in popularity. From the end of French Revolution to WWI, the aristocratic body became transformed into the feminine ideal that applied to all classes. While the Victorians are often seen as modest and prudish, they were the great innovators of underwear–and, not surprisingly, today’s most famous lingerie line, Victoria’s Secret1, adopted the era’s name.
For example, in 1829, the first steel-front busk fastening was created allowing women to put on or take off the corset without assistance. In 1830, the elastic corset was introduced offering more comfort. In the 1850s, the crinoline returned – though if a woman tripped and fell, the crinoline would embarrassingly spread out like 3-D fan, exposing her to all in her company (This brings to mind the scene in The King and I when The King was planning a special dinner for visiting European political figures and Miss Anna realized too late that while they were perfect dressed as women of English high society, she forgot that they weren’t wearing any underwear!). Victorian England also introduced laced trimmings and embroidery, the frilled pantaloon, as well as the first silk underwear. The invention of steam molding and dye also allowed lingerie to be colored and ideally shaped.
Victorian fashion highlighted a woman’s body with exaggerated full sleeves, minuscule corseted waists, and whalebone hoops and crinolines covered with yards of fabric and enhanced by bustles. Taking it all off was quite a task, and both textual and visual accounts associate Victorian clothing with sexual anticipation. Not surprisingly, this era spawned the first striptease shows. In 1876, garters that hooked to a woman’s stockings were invented and French dancers created great excitement when they showed glimpses of their garters stretched across their thigh. The garters were actually functional because they anchored the corset so that it could not ride up, allowing it to be worn in a less restrictive and tight manner (Steele 2001).
The invention of the bicycle and the walking dress in the Victorian age also spawned the creation of knickers and “drawers” that were attached individually to a deep waistband which fasted at the back. For the first time, women had a dual wardrobe and dual underwear, one for fashion and one for athletic pursuits.
As women in the early 1900s participated in more sports and vigorous dancing, they began to throw out their corsets in favor of more comfortable brassieres. In 1913, Mary Phelps Jacob, later known as Caresse Crosby, felt the corset was too restrictive for dancing in the nightclubs and claimed she invented the bra by tying two handkerchiefs together with ribbons. In contrast to the Victorian whalebone bodices and corsests, Jacob’s brassiere was soft, short, and gave a clear, natural separation between the breasts. She later sold the patent to Warner Brothers. The tango craze in 1915–as well as World War I and, to a lesser and indirect extent, the woman’s movement–encouraged the demise of the corset. The farewell to tighter garments, however, was short lived as woman turned to the girdle to achieve the long, lean, and androgynous clapper look of the 1920s.
After the war, however, and during the Great Depression, bosoms returned. The “bra,” a shortened from of “brassiere,” changed from flattening breasts in the 1920s
to accentuating them. In 1935, Warner Brothers introduced cup sizes, which acknowledged that women come in all shapes and sizes. The “alphabet bra” consisted of four cup sizes: A, B, C, and D. Double-D came along later and Double-A later still (Ewing 1976). During World War II, materials used to make undergarments, such as steel and rubber, were in short supply, so manufactures turned to synthetic materials which would eventually lead to Lycra, rayon, and Lastex.
By the late 1970s, cleavage made a return and developments in technology and fabrics led to more intricate and mass-marketed lingerie, including the Wonderbra2 which gave a “push up and plunge” effect. During the 1980s, padded and wire bras became top-selling items. Victoria’s Secret and La Perla3 lingerie lines grew in popularity as women demanded a soft and sensual style.
Come check out our latest WEBZINE fashionmaniac.com.I’d like to introduce to you our latest edition. Our team has been working on the latest fashion spreads, providing you with the latest runway trends, from Mercedes Benz Fashion Week New York for over a year. Our mission is to help you with your shopping sprees. We want to be your source to keep you current , showing how accessories, and clothing can be bought, and worn locally. Thank You for all your support over the year !
CONTACT INFO:
Cheryl Gorski | Photographer & Creative Director | 716-895-1689 | 716-903-0600 | info@cherylgorski.com | Also on Facebook specializing in: Fashion, Head shots/modeling/acting, Editorial, Portraits, Bands/ CD/ Press Kits, Corporate events, Web photography, Run-way
Cassie Rose: Director of Social Media,specializing in Visual Merchandising, Styling, Fashion editorial and Media arts, personal shopper, and blogger.E-mail isCassandraelsaesser@yahoo.com facebook-Cassie Rose Twitter- CassieRosee
Todd Warfield Prop Stylist Extraordinaire: 716-289-1078. Specializing in special effects, production of designing and building sets, theatre and photo shoots.
Michael Merisola Set Stylist & Expert in Antiques /Modern Furniture : Owner of Coo Coo U 1478 Hertel Ave. , Bflo, 716-432-6216www.coocoou.com
Andrew Brown: Hair & Make Up stylist and owner of Salon Rouge 700 Elmwood Ave. 716-884-1010. Specialising in Up Dos for weddings, color, cuts, Halloween , Runway , and photo shoots.
Stephen L. Phillips of The Lodge Auction House & Banquet Center 212 Cazenovia St. Buffalo NY 14210 www.thelodgeauction.com716-826-0168 Specializing in: Estate & Business Liquidation, Antique Consignment, On-Site Auctions, Estate Sales
Kimberly Cohen : Casting director and model/ actress for movies, plays,photography and films. kimcohen14@gmail.com , Twitter: kmcohen,Facebook: Kimberly Cohen
David Fernan : Costume & Prop Stylist specialising in vintage furniture & clothing, set design for photo shoots and movies 954-479-0576lifeinart@ymail.com ,