Will the Pan-Am Little White House Meet the Wrecking Ball?

Will the Pan-Am Little White House Meet the Wrecking Ball?

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

"Al, are you really, absolutely sure about this?" I asked my longtime friend over lunch today by the waterfront.

Seventeen year Buffalo Councilman and Former NY State Senator Alfred Coppola loves Buffalo, Buffalonians, and he truly, painstakingly loves the little white house he bought 25 years ago simply to preserve for our history.

It was this past mid-summer when Al Coppola took me on a tour through the little white house. He beams with pride when he tells the story of its use during the Pan American Exposition. He smiles like an excited kid whenever he talks about his precious little white house.

“That little white house is like my baby,” he's said on more than one occasion. It was an Indian exhibit where they would sell their gifts and wares. It now stands as one of only two surviving buildings from the Pan-Am; the other is the Buffalo and Erie County History Society building.

Two Thursdays ago I happened into Stillwaters Restaurant to meet a client and ran into Al Coppola. He’d just come from the Preservation Board hearing where he went as a volunteer and appealed to their senses one more time to consider allowing the restaurant to put a distinct and graceful canopy over their front steps. He was flatly denied.

“Thirty years I’ve been in the trenches with the Preservation Board,” Al said, adding “I’ve fought right along with them on every count to save our historic structures. But there’s got to be some respect for sustaining our history, not just preserving it. If a business cannot be allowed to sustain itself, what value has its history?”

Coppola is referring to the fact that Stillwaters Restaurant wants an insignia distinguishing canopy to give itself a prominent presence. To drive by the facility (made of four classic brownstones) one sees sporadically placed neons indoors, but no distinguishment to the fabulous welcome on the inside. “All Stillwaters wants is a fair chance to draw a customer,” Coppola says, adding “and think about a canopy over those stone steps—they’re going to get icy and there’s going to be a safety problem.”

When Al said he’d had enough, that if the Preservation Board doesn’t reverse its decision, he would throw in the towel on his own preservation efforts, citing a city’s efforts to mock itself in false virtues, I asked him what he meant by throw in the towel?

“I’ll tear down the little white house,” he said. I told him “Al, that sounds a little like Abraham carrying his son to sacrifice on the mount.” He replied “Well I’ll do it, because that board (Preservation) needs to blend and bend more to give respect to the business owner doing one’s best to sustain our heritage. This man (Stillwaters owner William Goodhue) has poured millions of dollars into preserving the heritage of those brownstones and also invite the public to his business—but he can’t even have a canopy? It’s just crazy!”

The following week Al Coppola had his permit filed to tear down the little white house. “You weren’t kidding Al!” I exclaimed. “You’re darn right I wasn’t,” he replied. I said “Gee I hope you don’t get disappointed and have to follow through tearing it down,” and he said “Me too—but this will tell us if that board really cares about our city or if they’re stuffed shirts with poor intentions on our behalf.”

There’s a lot at risk with a stand like this. Al Coppola wants to raise attention to the point he is making—that we all seek a more responsible (to both business and heritage) Preservation Board.

The next meeting for the Preservation Board is today—4 pm, 9th floor City Hall, and open to the public. I met with Al Coppola earlier today at Erie Basin Marina to ask him one more time—are you serious?

“You’re darn right I’m serious,” he said. “But this could backfire on you Al,” I told him, adding “people could say why are you punishing them for something the Board is doing to a business?”

Coppola said “Realize that when a Preservation Board dictates a death warrant to a business like Stillwaters that has poured millions of dollars into preservation, that the whole game has already backfired.”

Death warrant? How so? "It's not just Stillwaters," Coppola said. "It all the business owners who get cold NO answers and other stumbling blocks from the Preservation Board-- they treat the business owner with non-existence of respect. Stillwaters, for one, is a gorgeous preservation of history in itself, and merely wants a sign canopy to attract business for its survival-- so yes, it is in a sense a death warrant, or near to it."

One more question Al—tell me again—how do you account for tearing down the little white house—how can two wrongs make a right?

“They can’t,” he admitted, adding that “It’s just that I don’t want to be associated with the Preservation Movement in Buffalo that I fought so hard for over 25 years if they are unwilling to work with the community to sustain heritage via commerce as well as to preserve it. They’re acting like dictators with our money."

'Where were any of them over the past 25 years when I fixed, painted, repaired and preserved the little white house? Where were they when Mr. Goodhue invested millions into Stillwaters? These dictators dictate but don’t lift a finger to help.” He added "Frankly, I'm embarassed to even be associated with them when they take these wrong paths."

Good luck, Al; or shall we call you “Al-braham”? Along that line, let's hope a hand comes from the sky and says “Stop! Your point is well taken Mr Coppola. Save your house.” …I’m not sure I agree with your grave tactical risk here, but I do believe you do love your little white house, and I do hope you achieve some workable agreement with the board.

feed your soul buffalo

What Others Have To Say

  1. Perry

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 15:35

    I admire his stance, because he's right. But threatening to rip the building down over a this decision is freakin' idiotic.

  2. tudorguy

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 15:37

    Coppola said “Realize that when a Preservation Board dictates a death warrant to a business like Stillwaters that has poured millions of dollars into preservation, that the whole game has already backfired.”

    Seriously, a "death warrant"?

  3. carlmalone

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 15:39

    Good for Mr. Coppola. He obviously understands what it is going to take to make a statement against a dictator and his Board. It is about time someone took them to task. Just because they have historical presevervation in their title doesn't give them de facto right to push and intimidate people and businesses around. Meanwhile their supporter lackies look on in a daze saying "they are doing the right thing becuase they have presevation in their title. Business is alway bad, industry ruined this country. blah blah... The Pearl Street Grille incident was a complete fiasco for the Board and Tim should of went to jail for obstruction for that. Shame on him again.

    Way to expose the Board Mr. Coppola, and good for BR by actually tracking him down for comment. I half expected a one-sided attack on him, so props for that.

  4. sbrof

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:02

    The funny part is that the board only affects Allentown (which as a whole is doing just fine) and the city wide preservation board has no legal powers at all.. so while he wants to "take a stand" in the end people can do anything they want to any building.

    While I agree the Allentown board can be a bit... tyrannical.. sometimes you need to be to actually get something done. But in the end if they are going to pick their battles... they are doing a piss poor job of it. The buildings on Main Street that are literally falling apart. The print shop building that was demoed for a fake historic building. Let them people have a sign (better a nice sign, those buildings deserve it) and put your efforts elsewhere..

  5. hamp

    9 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:07

    It is incomprehensible to me that someone would threaten to demolish something they claim to love just to make a point. And this guy was elected to public office?

  6. platt4

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:10

    Is he for real? Coppola- a crummy councilman now expsing himself as a fool. Threatening demolition of history in order to make a point? Moronic. He calls the Pres. Board obstructionist when he was the obstructionist who held up construction of a downtown baseball stadium. Amazingly hypocritical.

  7. Denizen

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:18

    Do it Al. Have Buffalo Re-Use dismantle the house and have the remains shipped directly to Tim Tielman's front lawn.

  8. STEEL

    8 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:26

    Sounds like the spoiled little kid on the block. "You have to play by my rules or I going to take my ball home....Wahhhwahhhwahhhh!"

    This has to be one of the silliest things I have ever heard.

  9. SLEEPL8

    7 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:30

    This is some stupid childish bullshit. Stillwaters should be albe to build a damn canopy if they want but even without it they can survive if they continue to serve good food with good service. Knocking down a house doesn't solve anything. Grow up.

  10. TownLine

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:38

    Boy, wouldn't this just set a great precedent for holding historic properties hostage till people get what they want. We all know the preservation and planning boards can be a complete joke at times with their lack of professionalism, but this is just being completely unprofessional in return.

    Anywho, not like he'd ever get the demo permit, and if he did go ahead and demo without the permit, the city better throw his ass in jail.

  11. Sullymon54

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:44

    To be honest I drive by there all the time and although I've heard of stillwaters and I know people that have been there I can say that I didn't know where it was. I think its entirely ridiculous that they can't build a canopy to keep ice off the steps and essentially a sign to label the place. And yes Tim is entirely irrational in the way he makes some decisions.

  12. zimbuddha

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:47

    Townline, you wrote:

    "Anywho, not like he'd ever get the demo permit, and if he did go ahead and demo without the permit, the city better throw his ass in jail."

    Wrong. He owns it. He can tear it down. And he has the permit.

    We may hope and pray it stays up, but the law is on his side to do as he wishes.

  13. TownLine

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 16:57

    Just because he owns its, does not mean he's legally allowed to tear it down. Why would he already have a permit?

  14. mjman4

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 17:03

    what the hell...are you kidding me? this makes no sense...kinda cut off your nose to spite your face kinda logic...

    Putting a black and white yahoo like teilman on the board was probably the worst decision in decades...but, the board should be spending its time and energy developmiong real legistlation and real design guidlines for these preservation districts to follow. This "from the hip" preservation comes of to the lay person as OBSTUCTIONISM.

  15. EricOak

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 17:19

    Tim Tielman, if you actually knew him instead of just believing ignorant BR posts about him, is about the most rational and intelligent guy in Buffalo. He's for smart growth and development as well as preservation of an irreplaceable urban heritage. He has done so much work to make Buffalo's architecture and history known in the world. I don't see a problem with a canopy, but maybe we should hear the explanation for the denial before pilloring Tim Tielman. By the way, this has hardly been an authoritarian Board; they have allowed many buidlings to be demolished in the past few years.

  16. Charger

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 17:41

    First to correct sbrof: The Preservation Board has jurisdiction over modifications to properties in all Preservation Districts and to local Landmarks. Their decisions can be overturned by the Council. They have an advisory role in all demolitions in the City. Maybe you are thinking of the Allentown Association, which is just a community group and has no regulatory function.

    I find it very hard to believe that the owner of Stillwater has spend "millions" preserving the property. That's a lot money and Lord Chumley's (sp?) wasn't a dive.

    What are the facts of the case? What kind awning the the Board reject? Did they reject it outright, or did they ask for modifications?

  17. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 17:54

    Thats exactly right Charger. We aren't hearing any facts about the situation, like so many other things we talk about here, its all about sensationalism. Coppola is an outdated Good ole Boy politician, who just isn't important in this community anymore. For him to have a say in anything, he has to resort to sensationalism. Its his type of attitude and "leadership" that has brought Buffalo to its "Bottomed Out" status of a few years ago. This city is clearly making a comeback and its because of so many people that are moving forward DESPITE people like Coppola. Continue to ignore his kind and they will die off and disappear. Lets not be pulled back into the crappy ways of yesteryear.

  18. al-alo

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 17:58

    al, wtf? i always admired your independence - esp on municipal power, but preservation blackmail? c'mon.

    i hope this was just a flip remark made in the heat of the moment. i mean, hell, i say stupid stuff all the time.

  19. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 18:17

    he already has the Demo permit dumbass... I say its about time someone stood up to these broke ass hippy onstrcutionists and that a**hole Tielman. Not one of these people have sunk a dime into anything except lawsuits in their life. BLOW IT UP VEGAS STYLE AL!!! WE WANT TO SEE FIREWORKS AND ALL!!! SCREW THE PRES BOARD... ASSHOLES

  20. BloCity

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 18:24

    CAN I PLEASE SEE SOME SORT OF DESIGN OF THIS CANOPY!?!?! everyone keeps saying canopy canopy canopy but i have no idea what this is in regard to. Is it over the parking lot, an outdoor patio?!??! please fill me in.

  21. Frankster

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 18:34

    Al's
    Stupid
    Spewing
    Has
    Obviously
    Little
    Effect

  22. RonR

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 18:43

    I think this is great. Sometime these boards, committees and politicians need a reality check on their power.

    This situation reminds me a lot of the situation in Concord, NC with the owner of Lowes Motor Speedway. That site brings in hundreds of millions in event dollars a year. When it was built, nothing was around it. The whole site is zoned for racing. Last month the owner wanted to add a drag strip to his site, which it was zoned for. The city leaders at the request of a few residents denied the request. When this happened the owner, Barton Smith, said he would tear down the track at his own expense and locate somewhere else the city of Charlotte. This move would take MILLIONS away from Concord in taxes and tourism dollars. Needless to say they reversed the position and even tried to name a street after him.... They pretty much are ready to sell their children to keep this guy there. Kinda funny...

    Moral of the story is to make sure you are ready to deal with the consequences of your decision. While it is sad that this building could go, it could be a solid move in the long run to end the power of these few people.

    For those of you who are calling this guy scum, you should try being a business owner and dealing with a preservation board. I am all for preservation but the power trip of some of these people is amazing.

  23. Confused

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 18:58

    sbrof, I'm confused. Did you say the Preservation Board only covers Allentown. So, like Al, I could buy a historical significant building in the City, let's say City Hall, and then buy property in Allentown. If the Preservation Board does not like my plans for Allentown I can than tear down City Hall. As an attorney, my skin crawls at the prospect of this loophole. The City needs to close it NOW!

  24. Confused

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:01

    Charger thanks for the clarification but the same reasoning applies. I own a property not yet designated a "landmark" but I hold the City hostage if doesn't do what I want --- very scary.

  25. carlmalone

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:15

    Charger if you think he hasn’t spent some serious money in the place, please feel free to walk in there and check it out. Afterward you be saying, damn they spent a lot of money in this place. Not sure it was a smart business decision to sink all the money into the place but just walking through it certainly demonstrates they have in fact dumped a lot of money into it. This is post Chumleys

    Otherwise this make great political theater, ratchets up the emotion level. He obviously has no intention of tearing the place down, just trying to place a check on someone who thinks he's god but clearly is a couple stratospheres from it. When I worked for the City Teilman would not follow clear rules set forth commenting on demolitions, comment at the last minute with brief, vague comments, and was overruled by the courts it seemed like everytime. The guy is well intention but incompetent and anti-business. Just what we need…

  26. gaustad

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:23

    THERE IS A DECAYED CANOPY AT MANNY'S TWO DOORS DOWN IN THE SAME ROW OF BROWN STONES!!!

    It has been rotting there for 10 years.

    HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT?

  27. Eisen

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:25

    Stillwater does need some serious eye grabbing something. It blends it very well and is hard to spot. No one can deny that.

  28. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:44

    THE STILLWATER ALREADY FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY, THE PLACE SUCKS ANYWAY... JUST VERY FITTING THAT THE PRES BOARD WILL KILL THIS, THE JOINT WILL CLOSE, THEN THE BUILDING WILL GO INTO FORECLOSURE AND ROT AWAY... YOU PRESERVATION DICKHEADS (like myself) ARE PRETTY SMART!

  29. Hoss

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 19:53

    They should just put one of those blinding strobe lights in the streetside window, and get one of those inflatable yellow dancing guys like you see on Main Street. That'll bring 'em in. Or if they want a more affluent suburban crowd, maybe a HUGE inflatable gorilla or whatever it is that perpetually hovers over Grand Island.

    I'm all for guidelines though. I also have seen some ass-ugly 'awnings' in this town. A proper awning could class the place up a bit.

    Steel...

    "Sounds like the spoiled little kid on the block. "You have to play by my rules or I going to take my ball home....Wahhhwahhhwahhhh!""

    So funny. So true. So sad.

  30. mcsnyder

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 20:09

    This issue is exactly whey Buffalo is and will always be a second rate city. Preserving the past is one thing, but having a preservation board that limits business growth and development by wanting to save every single thing remotely historical is ridiculous.

    Have any of you ever toured the grain elevators or the Pan Am House? I'd guess that more people have eaten at Stillwater in the past week than have given a single thought to that Pan Am house. Let them have the canopy and while your at it let Buffalo develop and grow.

  31. Willie1

    8 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 20:27

    The Landmark & Preservation Board has nothing but the best intentions for the City of Buffalo, If it were not for this volunteer Board, Delaware Avenue would be without much of the original fabric which gives the Avenue it's charm & substance. I have appeared in front of this Board at least 4 or 5 times over my career in dealing with historic structures or structures in historic districts. Never once had a problem. Why? Because each time I proposed a good design solution to the individual projects I was involed with. My best guess on this matter, is that THE DESIGN SUCKED !!! It's as simple as that. There's no powerplay here. Mr. Coppola knows nothing about design, Architecture, or urban planning. Just take a look at his new crib. It could be the worst new house built in Buffalo in many years. And he's going to screw the people of the City of Buffalo over this? I hope he loses his publicly funded job over this prank. It's no wonder the good folks of the area have not supported his latest political ambitions. We all know it was a move to help his pension. This is a very sad move on his part.

  32. carlmalone

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 20:45

    Willie1:

    Just curious, but what color is it in your world?

  33. kelly

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 20:50

    carlmalone Willie1: Just curious, but what color is it in your world?

    Why, rose colored, clearly.

    And yeah, the preservation board has to get their priorities straight. Buildings literally falling down? Ignore them! Businesses asking for a canopy over the front door so people know where they are and no one breaks their necks on the ice? Hell no! How does that make sense??

    There are a lot more things in Allentown they could be worrying about. It seems like they only work to prevent business, and not to actually save structures in danger.

  34. hamp

    6 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 20:51

    It is amazing that we still have to defend preservation. Haven't we learned that one of the city's strongest assets is its beautiful urban fabric and abundance of great old buildings. Did we forget why a couple of thousand people are coming here in a few years from the National Trust? Preservation works, and it has a definite payoff.

    First rate ciities across the world have preservation boards/commissions. You want to see tough regulations,? Try going to Boston, Miami, New Orleans or New York. Those places are serious about historic preservation and it shows. And they're all making a lot of money off of it.

    Coppola is a joke. Unfortunately, not a very funny one.

  35. JamesEverlawn

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:07

    Stillwater (no "s" people) is in a great great building. but the food is horrible and the service is even worse. I think that a canopy is a fair request because the one in front manny's looked great when it wasn't beatenb to sh*t. but a canopy can't save this place. a new name and a new chef might work- there rep is so bad that they can't and won't overcome it which is tooo bad.

    the little house is too big of aloss for a Canopy infront of a bad restaurant. i see the point and admire anyone willing to stand up for what they think is right but this isnt worth it. find anther good pres. board issue to gamble the pan am house against.

  36. Frankster

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:25

    Kelly, you're confusing the Preservation Board with the Department of Permits and Inspections. The Board cannot inspect properties, cite owners, or send them to Housing Court.

    Al is confusing the Preservation Board with a day labor service. He says, "'Where were any of them over the past 25 years when I fixed, painted, repaired and preserved the little white house? " What were they supposed to do, show up in their grubbies and prime clapboards?

    And this anti-business claim is laughable. Until actual preservationists were allowed to serve on the Preservation Board, it acted like a rubber stamp for the Chamber of Commerce, forgetting that it is actually an arm of SHPPO (State Historic Preservation & Parks Office).

  37. TownLine

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:27

    The food at Stillwater is definitely the big downfall. I had a Fillet Mignon a couple weeks ago, $48, and it was the most flavorless piece of steak I've ever had. No comparison to their Backyard Neighbor, where I can get one of the better steaks in the city for under $30. Stillwater is one of the coolest places for a drink, but without a wholesale chef change, it'll never make it.

  38. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:29

    ** Mother's being the backyard neighbor

  39. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:29

    ** Mother's being the backyard neighbor, which always has the salads included in the meal, too!

  40. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 21:50

    woah, didn't mean to post that second one

  41. nick

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 22:16

    My company is working on a project in philly where we have to have approval by the art commission for any exterior signs and awnings. All signs and awnings are reviewed yet people continue to build. Preservation Ordinances exist in nearly all major and many non-major cities. Coppola is just whining to get his way.

  42. Denizen

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 23:13

    my landmark is bigger than your landmark!

  43. IMADIVA

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 23:14

    For the record...the owners of Lord Chumley's did the major renovations on the building before it was pruchased and made into the Stillwater. The money invested was in the purchase of the property.

    Al Coppola is probably one of the most ignorant politicians to have been elected to the Council. He was appointed to the Senate - a seat he lost and failed to regain. He is thought of as a "spoiler' for the stunt he pulled in the last Senate "race". His cousin Marc was a far more intelligent elected official. If in fact Al is foolish enough to tear down a historically significant building that he "loves", so be it. He'll have to continue to live as a fool and a "has been." People will remember him as an idiot and he'll have forsaken something that he "loved."

  44. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 23:20

    Why not a "spite fence" instead? Little white houses can't defend themselves.

  45. sayvanderlay

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 23:22

    I wish I could think of something more intelligent to say - but all I'm coming up with is "What a tool."

  46. BuffaloBloviator

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 1st 2007, 23:59

    I have to get involved in this.

    To demonstrate that Al Coppola is in fact “preaching to the choir” and not just singing “a cappella”, I have decided to stand in solidarity.

    I hereby pledge that if Stillwaters cannot get a canopy permit, I will cut off my own nose.

  47. zimmermann

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 00:19

    I talked to Al Coppola earlier this evening.

    There'll be a follow-up article in tomorrow's News-- it'll report how the Preservation Board turned down his request for demolition. When they put it in writing, he has the option to take it to court.

    In recent weeks Al Coppola has been visiting with every agency in town to do what he can to protect the 122 classic architectural heritage homes on Buffalo's West Side being torn down by the PBA.

    He's sad and absolutely sickened in disgust over the potential loss of Buffalo's original waterfront village-- classically architectured homes for Buffalo's early Italian elite and professional neighborhood. His little white wooden hut means nothing to him compared to childhood memories of those homes, their family legacies, some families of which still live there after generations.

    Coppola still strives 24-7 to be the best councilman Buffalo has. He always did so before he was first elected, when he was a successful restaurant owner on Main Street, shut down by an imbicilic federal fund drive to destroy Buffalo's main cutlural artery with a subway that downtown never revived from.

    I've never known a politician as fair and eager to help anyone and everyone as Al Coppola.

    His legacy, one reader wrote here today, consists of stalling the progress of closing the deal on Dunn Tire Park. The truth is that he did stall the signing-- demanding that there be a hearing as to why Bob Rich refused to put one red cent of his own money into a 42 million diollar taxpayer expense gift of a ballpark.

    Coppola then stalled it further to ensure that Mr Rich minimally sign a lease for the stadium. The City got a lease out of Mr Rich, and Mr Rich got leases galore for food stands and a restaurant out of the City.

    Mr. Copolla stood alone then, and he's willing to stand alone now. His conscience is his clean, clear partner. Note that even the lease was short lived on the stadium-- when it recently came up, Giambra gave the sweetest extension unheard of ever. Bravo to the rich ones, yet bravo what to the taxpayers?

    When City Councilmen got a $10,000 pay raise, Coppola refused to accept it-- he wanted a clean conscience when he went about his day asking others to cut their expenses and to cut our taxes.

    He got no thanks for that act though, and he never asked for it. He could've used the money too. He was busy raising a family and sending kids to college, and unlike others, he never became rich being a politician.

    Coppola started out as a noted prize fighter as a young man. And he fought his way up from there. One of his sons is now one of the top executives at a major television network in NYC-- still, Al stays humble and helpful and seeks answers and aid for his beloved city and deserves our thanks and respect.

    Al Coppola wants us all to make an issue of and a discussion for the needed representative corrections in our City's Preservation Board's tactics and methods. It should be Our board.

    When I visited Coppola's home thjis summer, he pointed out an array of framed pictures of Buffalo's lost treasures-- and as his eyes grew glassy, he expressed both his sadness for our losing such architectural treasures and his hope for preventing more damage. He desperately wants to see a Buffalo Rising.

    I asked Al Coppola back then when observing the old photos of Buffalo's lost architectural treasures what he thought of Tim Thielman, and he said to me: "You've got to understand that Tim's got a job to do. Sometimes it's a little dicey, difficult to decide, but his heart seems to be in the right place." That was then. But what is Tim Thielman doing alongside Al for the 122 homes on the West Side now?

    I'm not sure I'd have suggested to my friend Al the tactic he's chosen to express his desire to have us all look at our Preservation Board...it's so simple at first, but so controversial too...but I'm not so certain he's off the mark either.

    I do know one thing. Al Coppola is willing to put anything on the line for his love for Buffalo and for every Buffalonian he meets. They broke the mold when they made his steel character.

    Al Coppola is a Bufalonian giver who deserves respect and thanks, and some of the love he wakes up every day to give to all of us...from his heart.

    I asked him again tonight-- "Al, why the little white house?"

    He said: "I'm not rich for lawyers on this one-- I've got what I've got to put up, to make this fight for the right. That's all I've got."

    Regardless of all the squabbles, Al was right about one thing-- he's got our attention to something we need to address for all of our good.

    May time's whims bless him for his wild choice of action, because his inner sanctum reasons are all pure, and all for all of us.

    And note: Al pays his own way at Stillwaters and anywhere he goes. This was totally volunteer on his part. The only thanks he seeks is results.

    There's a lot of talk here...but did you know this?

    Get this... five years ago, Al Coppola offered to the Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society the opportunity to house on their property his little Pan Am White House. He'd already invested several multiple thousands of dollars into it, plus years of maintenance and physical work. It was His Dream and no one else's efforts to secure and maintain.

    Coppola offered to pay to move,and delicately, properly secure the little white house for all to see at the Historical Society. They were uninterested.

    Al's not sure why, but they turned him down on the offer.

    He repainted it this summer. He cuts the lawn around it weekly. There's flowers growing in the front boxes. He checks on its safety and soundness daily. He loves the little 1901 white Pan Am house. And he can only think of one thing he loves more---

    --That would be all of us, and all of ours. That's what Al Coppola stands for, and lives for- and fights for.

  48. JamesEverlawn

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 07:13

    This is so stupid but it is driving me nuts that you people keep calling it stillwaters. it is stillwater. isn't there some kind of joke about people in buflo adding an s to the end or a the to the beginning of every store name?

  49. benfranklin

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 07:27

    It's predictable that the armchair developers who frequent this site wouldn't understand Mr. Coppola's stance. To the business owners that lose sleep over how they'll meet a payroll, the following statement is like nails on a chalkboard....

    "If it were not for this volunteer Board, Delaware Avenue would be without much of the original fabric which gives the Avenue it's charm & substance."

    What a complete load of crap from a pompous jerk. It's easy to pontificate when you don't have a dog in the fight. The old mentality that business will screw things just to make a profit, no longer fits. Business in that area markets itself to people who love the city. The board needs to be more flexible... it's too easy for customers to drive out to the bright lights of Niagara Falls Blvd. Granted, the business may have issues, but limiting their ability to attract customers only increases their plight.

  50. TBone

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 09:19

    Hamp... No one has to defend preservation, what still needs defending, and rightfully so, is when a group of people attempt to dictate what a property owner can and cant do with land they purchased and invested in.

    I am not saying that the interference with property rights is always unreasonable- just that it must be questioned and defended EVERY time it is invoked.

    I would also submit to you that the often hypocritical arguments of those at the head of Buffalo's "preservation" movement have made people skeptical of their motives and are thus more apt to question their motives.. because they certainly are not always looking out for the city's "beautiful urban fabric and abundance of great old buildings".

  51. carlmalone

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:07

    BenFranklin:

    Great points on a number of fronts: armchair developers, and meeting payroll. You can't imagine the anxiety of wondering if your staff will get paid that Friday as you develop and drive you sales channel, and then you have to spend countless hours on this shit. liberal elistist with no concept of the demands of running a business and their crys for jobs, but only on their terms. F*** you!

    You think the preservation Board is not anti-business talk to the owners of Pano's, Pearl Street Grille, Casino folks, Jacobs, Medical Campus, Stillwater, etc. etc. etc... Not anti-business my ass. Prove that they are not Frankster, as certainly their is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

  52. Martin

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:15

    I was at the preservation board meeting that day for a permit myself. I can understand why they where turned down. they where number 20 on the list:

    "Reguest to resubmit application to install a 5' w. x approx. 12'1., custom-built, non-illuminated, classic style[barrel], acryic entrance canopy to the front of a 3-story masonary restaurant..."

    I believe the key word here is ACRYLIC. Everyone else in Allentown has to follow strict guideline. Hell my neighboors just shelled out 7 grand for 4 new windows becouse they have to be custom made in wood. I am sure if they applied for a "tastefull" canvas awning it would of been approved.

  53. NorPark

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:18

    So, why dont they just put the damn canopy up anyways, what can the preservation board do about it?

  54. Denizen

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:24

    Regulating basic urban form with zoning is one thing..that is needed in historic districts. But getting nitpicky over windows and awnings?? wtf? How many people actually have 7 grand to shell out for 4 fucking windows? If that's not elitism, I don't know what is.... Especially in a broke-ass city where so many families struggle just to put food on the table.

  55. Martin

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:26

    On a side note, I do not always agreee with the preservation board. But in all fairness they do work very well with people who are well prepared and try to keep the historic integrity of the property they are working on. If you have never been to a meeting/delt with them then you really have no business commenting on them

  56. Martin

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:32

    The window thing is a tough one, these damn windows cost a fortune to replace, plus they are so big! But maybe this will shed some new light on Allentown and give the owners of these home a new respect. Gotta love these homes one hell of a lot to live here and renovate them!

  57. al-alo

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 10:43

    martin,

    your friend got ripped off. there is no way a window should cost $1750 each unless they were 14 feet high with cut tiffany glass. id also suggest that windows that were only wood clad would likely also be acceptable in almost all applications.

    and i do hate those plastic awnings. who really thinks they are attractive? but i guess that isnt the point. does this awning damage the existing building's fabric in some way?

    and anyone buying a structure in a preservation district should be aware of the potential limitions and liabilites that go along with ownership.

  58. buffalocat

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 11:19

    I understand that the presevation board can be a gigantic pain in the butt, and I don't have any personal interest in or attachment to the little white building, but tearing it down out of pure spite is the most absurd thing I've heard in a long while. There are no other ways to get the point across??

    And...I'm not so sure this awning would be the key to super success for Stillwater. When it first opened, we frequented visited for their great "courtyard" menu and Sabres game viewing, and the place was usually packed - like crammed standing-room-only throughout the entire courtyard area. But those crowds have absolutely died down. I'd venture to guess part of the reason is that their dining room food and service leave much to be desired. And, most recently, when we brought out-of-town visitors there for brunch, we were sorely disappointed and out a tremendous amount of cash - it was shockingly overpriced and the food was really poor!! Needless to say, we were the sole diners in the place! Will an awning remedy this? We - and several of our friends who were similarly disappointed - won't be going back, awning or not. There are too many other consistent spots around town that we'd rather frequent...too bad, because the space is beautiful!

  59. eliz

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 11:27

    An acrylic awning? This is the Midway, one of the most unique, historic, and visually compelling group of structures on Delaware Avenue. And it's in great shape, not something that's been let to rot, like the house next to Pano's. I am sure all the owner needs to do is come up with a better awning design and the PB is by no means out of line in requesting that. They are correct to think of the future of the building, not the short-term goals of a failing business (and I doubt the lack of an awning is the major problem here).

    I also agree with others that commenters should find out what the PB's official responsibilities really are before spouting ridiculous and totally incorrect nonsense. The PB are a volunteer, advisory board. They can only recommend and only on matters brought before them. They don't roam the streets picking out problems they want to address. I agree that they should be more proactive about buildings in serious need, and I believe a plan is in the works to make that possible.

    I would also comment that Tim Tielman, who is continually abused here by people who know nothing about him, is not the only member of the PB.

  60. BuffaloRitz

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 11:48

    Well I will admit that I have not read all of the postings first. Material aside...you could make this into a safty issue and have your lawyer and your insurance agent make this a mandate.

  61. Olcott_Beach

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 12:53

    I cannot condone the tactics being exercised in order to install a canopy but, all things being equal; I cannot blame the man for shoveling shit back at the preservation coalition and that retarded-asshole Tim Tielman.

    Does that man have a real job?

  62. EricOak

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 13:16

    Good commets by Eliz--I second them

    BR: why do you allow comments riddled with obscene insults? Can't there be some standards for posting here? The level of debate on BR can get pretty low even without the crassness, but allowing that kind of language lowers the tone too far.

  63. scarmina

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 14:58

    Stillwater is a nice place and well done, however a canopy is not going to get people in the door and is not going to keep the sidewalk from getting icy, come on people, the snow goes horizontal here! I hope that the Preservation Board does not start adjusting their values every time someone like this tries to push the envelope. If they do, it will undermine every project that follows.

  64. TBone

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 16:38

    scarmina, Its not about keeping the sidewalk dry/thawed, its about the profile of the business. Further, if the owner wants to spend his money to put it up on his property and thinks it will help his business he should be able to, regardless of your opinion as to whether or not it will do what he desires.

  65. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 17:50

    HEY BILL ZIMMERMAN, NICE (edit) TO MY POST... YOURE LOOKING MORE LIKE THE RICHARDHEAD THAN ME MY FRIEND...

  66. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 21:40

    Watch it, BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME, Zimmerman censors everything...keep your head down and have some forged documents handy when you get to the checkpoint.

  67. zimmermann

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 23:37

    Dear Risingdamp-- you know better than to suggest I edit posts. As to the other fellow, he-- by his very name--

    "BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME"-- is not a fine gentleman like yourself.

    Please understand, Risingdamp, that you do not want to align with this pestilent oaf who readily ruins blog posts with his flagrant and diseased tongue.

    BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME is a paretic, psychotic, syphletic, myopic FOP of an intruding slime who ruins the flow of a good discussion.

    Much of the BRO editiorial base has quandried how to rid of someone who ruins our chats, but we only look upon such ill-taste twits as the town jerks.

    Apologies for this, but it had to be said.

  68. carlmalone

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 2nd 2007, 23:48

    EricOak:

    If you are referring to my crassness let me explain why. I bust my a$$ in the business community trying to employ people and make the city a better place. I run into the same issue Mr. Coppola brings up and have seen it again and again. Working for the City in my prior I've seen it from the inside so please do not waste my time claiming unfounded criticism. Am I mad: yes; am I angry: yes; do I swear: yes; do I care: yes. The City has problems and we need to rectify them asap.

    Do I think this is all theater: yes. Do I think he points out a problem: yes. If you can't take the crassness then sorry my friend, what can I say.

  69. zimmermann

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 3rd 2007, 01:39

    Carlmalone, you're fine and within bounds. Quite smart and welcome...Expound freely...but watch that BROkeepsblockingme guy, you know?

  70. PrincetonElms

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 3rd 2007, 04:09

    He should erect a gibbet in front of the 'little white house' and hang himself from it. Much more dramatic.

  71. yeahright

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 3rd 2007, 09:56

    Do what most would do. If they can't come up with a compromise, bet them at their own game. It is a part of the costs to do business in the city. Arrange to have the work done on the weekend. Then if and when you get taken to the courts plead stupidity, and then pay the fine and leave it up. The modeling agency on Allen St. , June II, was able to get their ugly glass block windows they same way. The judge ordered they pay a $1000. fine, and since the windows are already done, they could stay. So it just cost that much more to have the project completed. God knows we wouldn't want any of our brownstones facades