Wal-Mart and the City: More Questions than Answers

Wal-Mart and the City:  More Questions than Answers

Story Options

On October 12, Business First reported in a profile of Wal-Mart’s Northeast Region Director of Corporate Affairs Steven Restivo, that the big box store has considered building a new location in the City of Buffalo.

Is this a vote of confidence in our city? Or, is it a mega corporation preying on small business? Both? Neither?

Wal-Mart is a brand that evokes many passions. But before the prospect raises your hopes or raises your blood pressure, there are a number of questions that should be asked.

Can a large box store be integrated into urban fabric? What effect would a store like this have on the surrounding communities? What design standards should we considered for new box stores in Buffalo (or any urban area)? Would the gains in tax revenue and jobs outweigh the effects on small business? Do consumers go to Wal-Mart for goods like those sold on Elmwood or Hertel?

Now before you answer, let me pose a few more questions. Currently, there are a number of box stores that carry similar products (Target, Kmart), and pay similar wages. Is Wal-Mart really that different?

For that matter: Home Depot, Wegman’s, Tops, and Kmart each have large lots between the store and the sidewalk, creating a grey, unappealing dead space in neighborhoods and on major streets. If the Wal-Mart (or any box store) were multi-storied, fronted to the sidewalk, had large windows, parking in the rear, and small storefronts integrated into the building, could it be a positive addition to the urban fabric?

Could a Wal-Mart on Hertel and Elmwood, built using some urbanist principles be a boon to a very dead and unappealing intersection? Would it encourage the merging of two successful commercial and residential districts? How about an “urbanist” Wal-Mart instead of the large Kmart lot on Hertel?

Whether or not Wal-Mart does build in Buffalo, the questions raised could and should be applied to any box store from Ikea to Trader Joe’s. And as Buffalo rises, and businesses seek new locations, we should be prepared as a community to answer those questions, and not just pose them.

See the Michigan Land Use Institute'Article: The Incredible Shrinking Box:

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. flyguy

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:04

    The key here would be to implement strict design guidelines. Ideally this would be a rezoning or special use permit case that would require stricter rules to play the game. The key I think is to not let WalMart plop down its typical sprawling store set back a mile with a sea of blacktop up front. This would have to be cleverly and origibnally designed to fit an urban area. Then again I dont know how much you could ask for in that area of Elmwood/ Hertel/ Deleware where you have the likes of KMart sitting there as it is at Hertel and Delaware. I think better design was used at Delaware Consumer Square yet Target was designed as a standalone and doesnt "fit" the overall architectural scheme of the Consumer Square. Instead we ended up with a Target that looks the same as the one at the Boulevard Consumer Square, its cookie cutter at its best. The key is to avoid the bland and cookie cutter in welcoming these mega retailers rn by corporate america who have extremely fat bank accounts and have partially led to the decline of urban america by diluting it in physical blandness, creating "anywhere America". If you want to play in our backyard and turn a profit you should have to come to the table with something other than a design concept used in 100 other places. Humanity should not live in a retail building assembly line where cookie cutter stores are designed and built in the same way from city to city and town to town. Why do we accept that in our communities? The relationship between retailers and consumers is supposed to be mutually beneficial and have an element of civic involvement more than just donations of cash to local charities, it should include a physical built "fit" into the community as well, to truly become a part of that community.

  2. flyguy

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:08

    The key here would be to implement strict design guidelines. Ideally this would be a rezoning or special use permit case that would require stricter rules to play the game. The key I think is to not let WalMart plop down its typical sprawling store set back a mile with a sea of blacktop up front. This would have to be cleverly and origibnally designed to fit an urban area. Then again I dont know how much you could ask for in that area of Elmwood/ Hertel/ Deleware where you have the likes of KMart sitting there as it is at Hertel and Delaware. I think better design was used at Delaware Consumer Square yet Target was designed as a standalone and doesnt "fit" the overall architectural scheme of the Consumer Square. Instead we ended up with a Target that looks the same as the one at the Boulevard Consumer Square, its cookie cutter at its best. The key is to avoid the bland and cookie cutter in welcoming these mega retailers rn by corporate america who have extremely fat bank accounts and have partially led to the decline of urban america by diluting it in physical blandness, creating "anywhere America". If you want to play in our backyard and turn a profit you should have to come to the table with something other than a design concept used in 100 other places. Humanity should not live in a retail building assembly line where cookie cutter stores are designed and built in the same way from city to city and town to town. Why do we accept that in our communities? The relationship between retailers and consumers is supposed to be mutually beneficial and have an element of civic involvement more than just donations of cash to local charities, it should include a physical built "fit" into the community as well, to truly become a part of that community.

  3. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:12

    flyguy...once is enough.

  4. carlmalone

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:17

    They were going to put it in the Steelfields location, adjacent to the Buffalo River to serve South Buffalo. They have decided against it and will not build it there. It was part of their urban (distressed area) strategy/initiative. Again they pulled the plug on the project so don't worry about it.

  5. carl

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:18

    there is NOTHING good that would come from this, just watch any of the numerous documentaries about what happens when the big blue monster moves into your town....

    give them design guidelines, they will claim to follow them, then throw them out, give them zoning guidelines, they will break them, organize fake support for the store, and then ram what every they want down the cities neck. www.walmartmovie.com/ www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/ etc...

  6. RonR

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:21

    Why Elmwood/ Hertel/ Deleware?

    Why not closer to the east side or smack dab in the middle of the east side. People over there do not care about the design. They would only care about the cheap products and jobs that would be a walking distance from where they live.

  7. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:38

    ohh those people on the East just don't care about anything... amazing...

    As for Walmart I have to agree that while it would provide a place for cheap goods it would do nothing but hurt other local businesses. The benefit of Elmwood is its convenience and you are willing to pay a small premium to have it close and to have it local. Bringing in a walmart would totally change the dynamic and I would be willing to bet put a death nail in many many many businesses around the city as a whole. The businesses practiced of walmart make even my dye hard republican friends squirm and refuse to go there.

    If they for some reason do try to push into the city then there isn't much we would be able to do to get the kind of structure that would be nice. The smaller the footprint and the more stories it becomes would be the better. At least then it might act as an anchor to spur businesses to want to be near it.. Then again unlike a tops or wegmans it sells everything under the sun at a cheaper price so there isn't any competition.

  8. tonyarmani

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:39

    DO NOT LET WALMART INTO THE CITY OF BUFFALO ANY MORE THAN IT ALREADY HAS....Walmart kills jobs, competition, wages, and cities..this would be the absolute haymaker to make Buffalo irreversibley f*(@# beyond help...stop buying chinese crap and learn how to reuse what you have....

  9. Biniszkiewicz

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:44

    RonR: Why north Buffalo?

    Because smack dab in the middle of the east side doesn't bring in enough shoppers. See K-Mart at 998 Broadway, which couldn't pay the bills even with free rent and no real estate taxes. Also see the Central Park Plaza, which is a mostly vacant hulk. Those east side shoppers still find a way to get to stores in nicer neighborhoods (see Walmart at the Thruway Mall site). But the residents in nicer parts of Buffalo won't go to the east side to shop. Security costs are high and sales are not in deeply depressed neighborhoods.

    Retailers like to be around other retailers. The area you cite features retailers like Target, K-Mart, Home Depot, others, which makes retailers like Walmart feel comfortable.

  10. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:46

    oh great idea so k-mart goes out of business and there is an enormous empty box w/ a mile of parking

  11. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:49

    WOW....You people are crazy.

    What merchants would a Wal-Mart put out of business on the East side of the city? Please identify the locations of stores west of the 33 that provide fresh food at reasonable prices?

    I can see the damage that a Wal-Mart COULD do if located off Elmwood/ Hertel/ Deleware. This why I asked why not on the East Side. What I got is people think Wal Mart should not locate anywhere in the city. This is stupid.

    What jobs exist on the East Side that Wal Mart would take away? What businesses exist on the East side that would be forced to compete with Wal Mart?

  12. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 16:55

    Biniszkiewicz - Good point but the difference between K-Mart and Wal Mart is the grocery aspect. While I do not like to shop at Wal Mart for consumer products, I have shopped there for food in the past. The grocery store aspect is not imported from China. I feel, and it is just my opinion, that if a Mega Wal-Mart were to locate on the East Side, they would do well provided there was the grocery component.

  13. jsk1983

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 17:29

    Is Wal-Mart really that much worse than Target, Home Depot, K-Mart, and the like? Probably yes to an extent but there are probably more similarities than differences. Are there really any stores left that sell American made goods (outisde of food)? And how many retail jobs pay a living wage? By the way union grocery stores start at minimum wage and aren't exactly big on making employees full-time. In this point in time I question exactly which mom and pop stores would be threatned by a Wal-Mart in an area such as Buffalo. Personally I see K-Mart and Tops as the ones who should be worried. How many general merchandise stores are left in this city or any city for that matter.

    As far as urban design goes, is Buffalo really all that urban? The current density and form of the city pretty much dictates that parking is going to be required for just about every customer. The best one can hope for is a dressed up big box like the Target on NFB. Wal-Mart will, if pushed hard enough, build a better looking store. They generally turn out to be cartoon interpretations of historic styles, but its a step up form the standard design.

  14. bison716

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 17:54

    ITS A FREAKIN WAL MART! Im was born and raised in Buffalo and currently live in Houston, TX. I cant even count how many Walmarts are here in Houston with plazas filled with businesses built all around them. You guys are paranoid! Get a hold of yourselves, ITS JUST A STORE!

  15. bison716

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 17:55

    ITS A FREAKIN WAL MART! Im was born and raised in Buffalo and currently live in Houston, TX. I cant even count how many Walmarts are here in Houston with plazas filled with businesses built all around them. You guys are paranoid! Get a hold of yourselves, ITS JUST A STORE!

  16. RPreskop

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 19:46

    What is currently at the high traffic volume intersection of Hertel and Elmwood? A crummy little donut shop on the northwest corner bordered on by vacant lots and a billboard. A lage vacant lot on the southwest corner waiting to be developed. A crummy little half empty shopping plaza on the southeast corner. On the northeast corner a couple of forlorn, rundown two story buildings that are half occupied. That intersection does not sound like an interesting destination to any sound minded person. Whether or not Wal Mart comes into this area of the City of Buffalo or anywhere else nearby is anyones guess. However I do not shop at Wal Mart and I do not like Wal Mart but at the same token I am neither for nor against Wal Mart coming into North Buffalo. It is new investment and it will provide city residents with another shopping destination and one less reason to have to travel out into the suburbs. Yes it will make competition more intense but lets face it the business world of today is highly competitive and there is no avoiding that fact. There are several city residents that love Wal Mart and there are several like myself that despise Wal Mart. However if Wal Mart wants to come in and develop a superstore in North Buffalo anywhere north of Hertel between Delaware and Elmwood than that is just perfectly fine by me. Right now that Elmwood- Hertel intersection sorely needs redevelopment and investment and if Wal Mart builds there than so be it. I believe in providing a variety of retail shopping venues for Buffalo city residents not everyone wants to shop in little high priced boutiques and mom and pop rinky dinks in Elmwood Village. We need to provide a more diverse variety of retailers in the City of Buffalo. More competition means a healthier economy because it will pressure existing business to invest and upgrade their operations.

  17. ktl340

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 20:14

    Target is already in the city om Deleware, correct?

  18. NBJOHN

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 20:44

    Zero to negative population growth... Little disposable income. High sales taxes (thank you our elected idiots)Why would any store/chain want to locate themselves in Buffalo or WNY for that matter?

  19. sayvanderlay

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 21:22

    So RonR says: "Why not closer to the east side or smack dab in the middle of the east side. People over there do not care about the design. They would only care about the cheap products and jobs that would be a walking distance from where they live"

    Ron, maybe the people on the East Side owe you an apology - thye have more pressing needs to worry about than design standards. Like putting food on the table. You see, worrying about whether or not a building is built up to the curb is a nice luxury that not everyone can afford.

  20. joey

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 22:03

    If a WAL-MART was built on the East side..wouldnt it spur development arounf it? Housing, etc. People want an urban environment..they could walk to their store to do their shopping. But OH WAIT...IT WOULD PUT OUT OF BUSINESS THE 30 OR 40 ARAB OWNED STORES THAT CELL 2 WEEK OLD BREAD AND OTHER EXPIRED COMMODITIES!!!!!

  21. RisingDamp666

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 22:29

    A Wal Mart somewhere at Buffalo's periphery would be ideal: close enough to serve in-town customers that seek what Wal Mart offers,but also far away enough to draw in people from outside the city and help Buffalo retake gross receipts lost decades ago. Like its pungent, proverbial twin, Wal Mart happens. So why not mitigate its worst effects on city businesses while maximizing its economic pull? The worst thing that could happen is Buffalo says no to Wal Mart and the suburbs reap all the rewards. Of course, the ideal solution would be a regional ban on big box stores over 90,000 sq ft. That would keep the wolves at bay altogether.

  22. 300miles

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 22:34

    I don't really understand why Walmart should be required to change it's design to fit strict urban guidelines, while we permit stores like Wegmans to build whatever they want. Wegmans is just as much a Big Box store surrounded by a sea of parking. Seems like a double standard.

    Personally I think all stores in the city should adhere to urban design guidelines. But I don't think it's fair to single out certain companies, while giving other companies a free pass.

  23. toodeeptilnow

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 5th 2007, 23:01

    I moved to White Plains (twenty minutes north of NYC) from Buffalo and we have an "urban" Walmart. It's two stories with an attached parking garage. There's no sprawling parking lot, and it blends in nicely with the surrounding downtown core.

    Across the street is a four story building with parking garage that houses a Barnes and Nobles, Circuit City, Target, and a movie theater.

    If it is going to happen, I would like to see a similar design incorporated. I would like to see Buffalo force these big box stores to develop more in check with the neighborhood atmosphere.

  24. mac1234

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 00:34

    I think this is a horrible idea. I am completely 100% against everything Wal-mart stands for. We don't need that anywhere near small businesses regardless of the economic benefits. The disadvantages to small shops, mistreated employees, and oversees factory workers far outweighs any economic benefit we may gain from purchasing unfairly discounted goods

  25. jamesbflo

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 01:44

    as a small business owner myself, i appreciate, but don't buy the small business defense. Small businesses can very well compete with big box retailers by carving out their own unique niche and perfecting their business model. Small business can't compete with big box at their game, volume... but can excel at service and expertise. If a small business is put under, then they most likely didn't play the game correctly. America is capitalist folks, and the business world has always been about competition. A good businessperson understands their strengths, market, and is able to evolve. Besides, Buffalonians are very loyal people.

  26. urbanxplorer

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 09:32

    I'm not a big fan of Walmart but lots of people are. As a life long Buffalo resident and current N.Bflo'er, I'm not opposed to Walmart as long as it's placed appropriatly. I support the former Hills/Big Lots site on Delaware. The site is an eyesore in North BUffalo and could easily support a big box retailer with minor disruption to the surrounding neighborhoods. As far as whether or not it would hurt small businesses, we already have Target, Home Depot, etc so the precedence is there and Hertel is doing better than it did before these stores came to the neighborhood. Someone who is shopping at Conley Furniture is not going to look at Walmart.

  27. Auburner

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 09:48

    I have to say, I am not a fan of Wal Mart, have only been to the store once. Also have to say, what is the difference between them and Costco, Target and other big box retailers. If they must put a store in the city, I hope they do it on Main St, perhaps near West Ferry? That would give access to the East and West sides and perhaps reshape the street which once was thriving (years ago).

  28. rubygreta

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 09:48

    Hey Toodeeptilnow - you forgot to mention that the multi-story White Plains Walmart is an old Sears store that was built in the 1960's. And the mutli-story parking garage was also built in the 1960's. Walmart would NEVER have built that building from the ground up. They wanted a presence is lower Westchester County, and this was the only available spot.

    Shopping at Walmart is a miserable enough experience. But having to drive up three flights of parking and figure you way around a 3-story store is nightmarish.

    Having said that, the notion that Walmart destroys jobs and communities is ridiculous. They provide low-cost merchandise to low-income people. And the so-called "mom and pop" stores that they will allegedly put out of business are already out of business. So build the damn thing. Require high-end landscaping in the parking lot and everything will be fine.

    And working at Walmart is better than staying home and collecting welfare, even if the net income gain from working is minimal (we can have a discussion on the welfare problem another day).

  29. Tiburon1724

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 10:01

    bison - having moved here from Orlando, I have first-hand seen Wal Mart destroy upper middle class neighborhoods and turn them into crime-ridden holes. I had to move to escape the crime one Wal Mart brought with it. Wal Mart is completely different from Target in the clientele (sp?) it attracts. It does act as a vacuum that destroys small business and brings the wrong element in with it, not to mention traffic and congestion. Of course the stores in FL were Supercenters, but I have never seen a "good" Wal Mart.

  30. bison716

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 10:37

    I have. One case should not spoil it for others.

  31. r129

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 11:10

    One thing to consider is that many people in the City of Buffalo already do shop at Wal-Mart, they just travel to the suburbs to do so. If people are going to shop at Wal-Mart anyway, why not provide the option of doing so in the city? Nobody can honestly believe that those who shop at Target on Delaware would be purchasing the same items at a small business on Elmwood if that store wasn't there. No, they'd be driving out to Niagara Falls Boulevard. Also, I'd be willing to bet that Target draws in some shoppers from Kenmore and Tonawanda who otherwise wouldn't be shopping in the city. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for supporting small businesses, and I personally try to do so, but everyone isn't necessarily thinking that way. Most of my family lives in the city, and driving out to the Boulevard to go shopping was always the natural thing to do for much of my life. Once the stores at the Delaware Consumer Square opened, a good portion of their shopping was done there instead.

  32. bison716

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 11:19

    I agree.

  33. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 11:24

    I couldn’t agree more w/ r129. While I’m not a wal-mart fan I have to admit that the people who shop at small stores on Elmwood, Hertel or wherever aren’t going to stop going there b/c "oh dang lets just go to that new wal-mart down the road and do it all in one store". People shop at those stores do it for the experience, an experience that cannot be achieved at wal-mart. Additionally those that do shop at wal-mart are going to continue to shop there no matter what. This is a very similar situation to the Buffalo Creek Casino.

  34. WeLovePanos

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 12:29

    I already see lawsuits flying... Mr. Lippes andd Tielman...start stretching out

  35. MJWorthington

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 12:48

    1) They all sell overseas items. Kmart, Target, Etc. The american people have voted for cheap imported goods over the past 40 years. I can remember the clothing commercials as a kid around 1980 saying please buy made-in-the-USA. We see where that went. We want everything disposible and want to pay disposible prices for it. Even our homes and neighborhoods are these days.

    2) Best bet would be a city financed mega-block in that area with leases to the tenants. A common parking area garage/surface interior to the block with large big box locations facing the street. Mandate at least two entrances, one to the street and one to the parking area. Walmarts exist in Canada attached to malls with up to four entances (two outside, two inside) so it has been established already. Integrate smaller store fronts along the street.

    3) I go to Walmart for paper towels etc. because they are consumable necessities and I want them cheap. I separately go to Wegmans for food for the atmophere coupled with the fair prices. What I save is freed up to spend at local stores for higher end durable goods. Gong to Tops to pay 2x as much for paper towels only decreases what I can spend locally on other goods and services. People shopping for picture frames for example are going to Walmart for $2.50 frames regardless of where the walmart is if thats what they want to spend on them. Those that want $30 higher quality ones will be going more local regardless. Give the city the option and make its design unique to the city.

    4) For a far reach commnet: What would be the results of converting the first floor of the Main Place mall to lease for a Super Center. Underground parking and direct transit access already exist. Think it would spur more around it in an area that now has nothing?

    5) And for the love of all that is holy, stop acting like a sovergn nation with a sweet heart deal for a monopoly on an already high-porfit enterprise is some kind of buisness prodigy. If that deal was open to any private casino operators in the country, we would have had even bigger results. Hell, the ones in PA were even willing to build a new arena for the NHL Penguins if they got that deal. If the Seneca's were so buisness savy why is this their only endevour besides gas and cigarettes and why did they need a compact to accomplish it (excluding the gaming)? Some what coincedental that those other two are becasue of tax free status too? Now inmagine if we gave them a monopoly on them. We'd have some high rollin gas stations. ;)

  36. BuffaloCook

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 13:23

    Please watch the documentary Walmart: The high cost of low price. Walmart consistently moves out of a town before the town is able to reap the tax benefits. It increases the number of people on public assistance. Wal-mart is exactly what Buffalo does not need, and honestly, I'm shocked that we'd even consider it, seeing as how we don't even want a Pier 1 on Elmwood. This corporation is evil and destroys communities. If the ball really gets rolling on this, I invite you all to join me on the website Wake Up Wal Mart.com, and get involved in our local chapter to stop it, so that what has buried other towns across the country doesn't leave us destitute as well. There are countless reasons not to build a Walmart, humane reasons, union reasons, healthcare reasons, tax reasons, employment reasons, but Walmart: The High Cost of Low Price will explain them a lot better than I can. Before we make an uninformed decision and get hoodwinked by the Walton children and China, I implore you to do your research.

  37. rubygreta

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 15:30

    BuffaloCook - the documentary is union funded. Why are the unions so mad? Because they can't unionize ONE Walmart in the entire United States, even in leftoid places like Ithaca. And Walmart is the #1 employer in the United States. IF WALMART IS SO HORRIBLE, WHY ISN'T ONE OF THE STORES UNIONIZED?

    WalMart is no different than the vast majority of retail chains, large and small. Retail pays low because the skill level is low, the margins are small and the competition is tremendous.

    And as R129 said, residents of Buffalo drive to the suburbs to shop at WalMart. Might as well let them shop in Buffalo.

  38. BuffaloCook

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 16:49

    Ruby- because Walmart fires its employees if they try to unionize. Which essentially is against everything our country was built on. But, Walmart bypasses this, and many other laws. In fact, Wal mart completely shut down one store in Canada overnight when its meat packers decided to unionize. They just packed up and closed rather than have a union. Do you know why they don't want to unionize their employees? Because then they'd have to pay them fair wages and medical benefits. The Walmart manager's handbook specifically states to instruct employees to go to local government for assistance with coming up with medical bills. Fortunately Ruby, the documentary focuses on so much more than the unions. It devotes time to the terrors they inflict on the child laborers in China, the wages they pay them, the local businesses they undercut - and I'm not talking about mom and pop stores, I'm talking about huge companies like RUBBERMAID that could not make a profit selling to Walmart at the prices they demanded and had to go out of business. Now please look at this from another point of view. The right to unionize is what sets the USA apart from country's with poor working standards. What has moved us past the industrial revolution. Why you don't see four year olds with black lung and one arm and no health insurance in our country. And do I think there is such thing as too much power behind unions? Yes, but the right to unionize is also a necessity. If you'd like further education on the economics of large business and its negative impact on the global economy, environment, and human society, please feel free to pick up a copy of The Corporation, of which I was a contributor, and I can assure you, was not assembled by any sort of a union. Its time this country pulled its head out of its ass and made some positive choices. Lets choose American. Lets choose quality. Lets choose a safe and beautiful Buffalo.

  39. sayvanderlay

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 17:01

    Why is it that everyone's ethical standards come into play only when shopping at WalMart? Is it because you've heard the rhetoric over and over again? Check out the tags on the clothes at Target, Kohl's, etc - see how many of the countries you've barely even heard of.

  40. BuffaloCook

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 17:44

    You have a good point Say. Although just because something wasn't made in America doesn't mean its bad. As long as fair labor and trade practices are employed When shopping you should find out the general working conditions of the country your product originates from. On the other hand, it is easy to "start at the top and work your way down," when targeting poor ideals.

  41. ILuvNickelCity

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 6th 2007, 18:30

    I'm not a big fan of Wal-Mart;... however I think it would benefit a lot of consumers by locating a store in the city of Buffalo. As for inferior products being made it China,... well everything is made in China even the most expensive designer clothes and shoes are made in China. Most American designer factories are located in China or other countries with low labor cost. I also think we as American consumers should be very concerned about all the recalls of merchandise made in China, (especially the toys). Every week there seems to be a recall. My son expressed to me that he thinks China is deliberately contaminating these products.. I'm beginning to agree.

  42. Rebecca

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 11:23

    Wal-Mart would not be building a new store just to make it more convenient for these Buffalonians who "shop there anyway." They would be building a new store because they believe they will be getting new customers.

    Why is Wal-Mart the bad guy and not Target or K-Mart? Wal-Mart is the biggest and the worst. Make an example of them and everyone else will follow. Changing a smaller chain before Wal-Mart would put them under - you've got to take down Goliath.

    Additionally, Wal-Mart doesn't just sell goods made in China. They literally forced several US companies to shut down their US plants and move to China. Wal-Mart carries your product and then demands a lower price and the company can't afford to lose Wal-Mart as a purchaser.

    Wal-Mart could provide healthcare for all their employees with 1% of their profits. That would save Erie county a huge amount of money that it spends providing medicare to Wal-mart employees. Instead, five of ten richest people in the world are part of the Walton family.

    Wal-Mart is disgusting.

  43. Rebecca

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 11:25

    FYI - New Balance has 8 or 10 styles that are made in USA. Their goal is to get all their shoes back to being made in the states - and actualy states, not Guam or places like that. American Apparel has the highest paid textile workers in the world and they're flourishing.

    This is the movement we need to be supporting, not Wal-Mart.

  44. WeLovePanos

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 11:30

    this is typical Buffalo people complaining... Stop the big guys, stop progress, we want an old General Store... Obviously you cant fight a free market enterprise, this is globalism people and the cities who embrace it will thrive and Buffalo has not...thus we are where we are...

  45. BuffaloCook

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 12:33

    Rebecca's points on walmart are excellent, and so are her points on the companies that are the opposite of them. Existing stores on Elmwood (or just off) like Sweet and Dirty, sell American Apparel clothing. Why would we want to put that company out of businessby bringing in Walmart? Thank you Rebecca for bringing more facts and well thought out arguments.

  46. ILuvNickelCity

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 12:52

    You're absolutely correct WeLovePanos....We most certainly can't stop globalism; as Rebecca stated the Walton family are some of the richest people in the world, and believe me it would be useless to try to stop them from locating their stores in the city of Buffalo or any city for that matter. Most who have tried to stop them have failed.

    What cities can and should do is demand what type of architecture the stores will have so they can blend well into urban communities.

  47. tommyBluez

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 15:09

    ew. wal-mart. worst of any cookie cutter big box retailer.

  48. r129

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 15:22

    I remember reading in AdAge that Target has become more demanding from a supplier standpoint than Wal-Mart. It seems that Target is looking to match Wal-Mart on price, while retaining their perceived superior design.

  49. WeLovePanos

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 17:16

    Agree I luvNickelCity... Architecture can blend, but lets not try to impede progress because people will show by their patronage whether a WalMart is needed and wanted...

  50. jimmycrackcorn

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 17:42

    the place wal-mart was looking at was on the steelifields site, in south buffalo. But i'm pretty sure that was shot down. Which is kinda of disapointing, because that would have been a good place for one. The area wal mart wanted was ~70 acers along the river next to the southpark lift bridge. This area has been cleaned up and if pretty much ready for deveolpment.

    but don't worry it would have been in an area of the city where you fancy people don't go, so you wont have to look at it.

    bye the way i hate those stores. but when you see a good fit, you have to agree.

  51. ILuvNickelCity

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 18:11

    Like I said I don't particularly care for Wal-Mart , but there's many people that do....In a lot of instances Wal-Mart is the only retailer they can afford because of the economy. I use for an example a situation that happened here in Atlanta. There is a new Wal-Mart located in a part of the city where about 1.5 miles to the north of the store you have some of the wealthiest neighborhooods in the city and whereas 1.5 miles to the south reside some of the poorest. The people in the community around the new location (Howell Mill Rd) fought the new store tooth and nail.... The community finally acquiesced to the new store. Allthough it had to be built with certain guidelines. I must admit it does fit into the community quite nicely.

  52. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 7th 2007, 22:57

    At least Wal Mart sells Trico wiper blades...oops, never mind.

  53. WholeLottaJibbaJabbah

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 20:49

    dear mr. and mrs. walmart, we want bass pro, didn't you get the memo? sincerely buffalo

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links