Sometimes Convenience Is Just Not Enough

Sometimes Convenience Is Just Not Enough

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

I hear that the two Wilson Farms locations on Elmwood Avenue are due for a cosmetic makeover. Now if it were up to me, then I would day knock them down and start again. First off, they are small, unattractive eyesores on the street that shoppers stop into because of pure convenience. Obviously that is why they are called convenience stores. Can you imagine if these two store locations put an iota of thought into the buildings… not just the products? It’s not that I care for the products that much, but if I need some cereal and I don’t feel like going grocery shopping, then I find myself stopping in. In the perfect world these two corner stores would be places that would make me want to stop in.

At this time, the Wilson Farms chain is going through some cosmetic improvements. It was hoped that these improvements would entail rethinking the stores completely. It has been the dream of many to see these asphalt-ridden eyesores turned into modern day shopping destinations. Wouldn’t it be nice to see them moved up to the street with the parking in the rear? That would certainly help the store’s exposure. And can you imagine an attractive design (both inside and out) that would make you feel good about spending your money there? As it is now, I feel like the stores are dedicated to playing the lottery rather than catering to a shopping experience. I wonder if corporate knows just how many people who live in the neighborhood avoid the stores. Wouldn’t you think that input from the community would be a logical step towards improving the chain?

As we start to see capital improvements taking place at these neighborhood convenience stores, lets hope that the powers that be do more than slap a new dorky roof on top. Ah well, we’ll soon see what sort of cosmetic changes are taking place at the Wilson Farms throughout the region. It’s a shame, here’s a company that really has the ability to reinvent itself to keep up with the needs of the entire community. Here's some history on Wilson Farms and the 200-store operation.

feed your soul buffalo

What Others Have To Say

  1. Pauldub

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 17:42

    These are not set up for, nor were they ever meant to be "Shopping destinations".These are simply the modern equivalent of the little corner store where my grandmother would send my father for bread. She told me stories about how the men would go there and get a smoke and a match for a penny. The Mom & Pop corner store. Used to be a storefront, now a little lego thing. If aesthetics will improve the bottom line, it will probably happen. If not, well maybe they will at least get a new floor scrubber and do something about that awful smell that permeates just about every one of their stores.

  2. ChocolateShake

    16 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 17:59

    Its easy to knock Wilson Farms but the fact of the matter is that they are one of the few stores in the "village" that provides *necessities* (emphasis added) for the people that live in this neighborhood. Elmwood needs to put more emphasis on stores that provide *affordable* necessities of life (emphasis added) and less reliance on trendy stores that sell over-priced trinkets. This is a convenience store and not Tiffany's. Wilson Farms sells cheap beer, milk, cereal and condoms - why kind of design does a store of that caliber merit?

    Sure it would be nice to have "dense mixed-use" facility that catered to those who like to walk, ride a bike or take a magic carpet while shopping for 80 dollar hipster t-shirts or having a few pints with the crew from Canisius. However, convenience stores (as well as gas stations) provide things people need and not lust over. The Wilson Farms on Elmwood/Summer is one of the few operations on that stretch of Elmwood that has a line to check out at any given time of the day.

    I would like to see some of the BRO writers come up with a business plan that could show how operations such as Wilson Farms with a low profit margin could make "improvements" and still stay afloat. Its easy to moan and groan when its not your capital at risk. Put up or go pound salt.

  3. lalala

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 17:59

    good luck, as i know the company they are cheap and only interested in the bottom line. but thats just how these chains run.

  4. comptart_lws

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 18:11

    what if the parent company defined their budget and pushed the start date back one semester and let Brad Wales' students "have at it" with the fixed budget and a set of practical parameters?

  5. Tesla

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 18:54

    I think Chocolate Shake put it beautifully.

    By the way....whoever decided on the green lights needs to pull their head out of their ass.

  6. Tesla

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 18:55

    We should be glad that we have Wilson Farms stores instead of just Bodegas.

  7. AtwaterLouse

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 19:09

    Wouldn’t it be nice to see them moved up to the street with the parking in the rear?

    No. That would increase crime. Faster getaways for robberies, and much greater ease of parking lot muggings. Many customers would skip going to WF if parking was behind the store, especailly after dark which is a good portion of their business. Even the hipster-friendly coop was smart enough to not put parking behind the building.

    And can you imagine an attractive design (both inside and out) that would make you feel good about spending your money there?

    Inside a WF, it seems to me the design problems are simply the result of everything being so crowded together. But there's obviously a very good business reason for this: maximizing the number and variety of items for sale within merchanside space available.

    As it is now, I feel like the stores are dedicated to playing the lottery rather than catering to a shopping experience.

    I'm also bugged by lottery crowd delays, but I don't think that's an issue of store design. Problem there is time it takes employees to serve customers buying the tickets and asking questions.

  8. AtwaterLouse

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 19:11

    what if the parent company defined their budget and pushed the start date back one semester and let Brad Wales' students "have at it" with the fixed budget and a set of practical parameters?

    I've no idea who Brad Wales is, but in the spirit of "what if" - What if Mr. Wales opens his own store, hires his students as interns if he wishes, and leads by example within his own fixed budget and practical parameters instead of wanting to play with somebody else's money?

  9. Bizzles

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 19:12

    On a completely unrelated note, I think I'm in love with the Think Financial girl...

  10. becker

    10 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 19:15

    I feel like the stores are dedicated to playing the lottery rather than catering to a shopping experience. I wonder if corporate knows just how many people who live in the neighborhood avoid the stores.

    Chocolate Shake is spot on! The store is busy every time that I am there, I know very few people who live in the neighborhood who do not stop in Wilson Farms at least once a week to pick-up some essentials. If you believe that it can be done better, then open your own convenience store on Elmwood, something that is built to the street and mixed use residential / commercial. See if you can justify constructing a new building just to appease a few neighbors who are impossible to please. See if you find it practical to staff a 24/7 convenience store with two entrances and no visibility to the people who are entering the store. This is a high crime area and it is important for the safety of the staff to limit and control the entrance / exit of the store and to see the make / model of the car that people are driving. I am sorry if that doesn't jive with the demanding standards of a few residents, but who cares because those residents are the ones who are boycotting the store. Don't change for the dozen who don't shop, instead let them focus on making the store more appealing to those of us who do.

  11. Tesla

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 19:20

    haha....I agree Bizzles.

  12. FrankyBlueEyes

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 20:01

    Have to agree with Chocolate Shake....it is very easy to knock the Company...but it does have low margins and stiff competition........I would just hope for spruced up stores, new lighting flooring, etc......hoping for a complete new build at street level......I wouldn't be holding my breath......but we can always hope.....it's the holiday season.......so whoop dee doo!

  13. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 21:04

    EXACTLY, WHY DONT YOU HIPPIES OPEN YOUR OWN STORE, BUILT TO THE STREET WITH A MUGGING LOT, UMM I MEAN PARKING LOT AROUND BACK! Sell all or your subarus and get one started hippies!!!

  14. icecreamsub

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 21:23

    mugging lot? there's no crime on Elmwood

  15. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 21:46

    lol...ask the girl who got dragged 20 feet hanging on to her purse in front of Shoefly

  16. icecreamsub

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 21:57

    then build more parking lots in front of the stores I guess

  17. Andrew

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 22:05

    There needs to be a 3-story parking ramp on Elmwood to settle the parking issue with this street. You could even put retail in the front.

  18. gaustad

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 22:09

    icecreamsub, are you delusional? There is a new story every week in the news of someone who was mugged on/off Elmwood. Cars are regularly broken into. Houses as well. you really need bars on you windows downtown.

  19. tommyBluez

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 22:24

    As much as they aren't pretty - ever since Latina's closed, I've noticed stopping there that the two of them, especially the one on the corner of Auburn really packs a lot of groceries into a small store. It's a convenience when i don't want to run to wegmans or tops, because they carry a lot of things that Lexington Co-Op doesnt --- or when I'm not in the mdoo to pay $6 for a loaf of bread (the CHEAPEST Lex Co-Op had on the shelf last time I stopped....)

    They're not pretty but they're functional. An "Urban Re-design" to make it fit more in the neighborhood would be nice thoughy.

  20. icecreamsub

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 23rd 2007, 22:46

    if you're trying to scare me off to the burbs it ain't going to work.

  21. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 00:14

    Wtf.... its a convenient store. Your pretentious urban design doesnt apply.... Next thing ya know u guys are goin to ask for gas stations built to the curb with pumps in back

  22. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 00:15

    Wtf.... its a convenient store. Your pretentious urban design doesnt apply.... Next thing ya know u guys are goin to ask for gas stations built to the curb with pumps in back

  23. gaustad

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 01:04

    THE CLIMATE IN THIS TOWN IS THE REASON WHY PEOPLE LEAVE - CANT CAHNGE THAT

  24. Dionysus

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 01:26

    I agree that these Wilson Farms stores are easy to target because of their lack of aesthetics. But they really do serve a purpose! I mean, how long have these stores survived while countless others on the Elmwood strip have come and gone? That serves as proof of their usefullness, at least to me. For example, they are the only stores that you will find open during the wee hours of the morning on any given weekend. And I have a, uh, friend who used to semi-regularly do the "walk of shame" on early Saturday and Sunday mornings after a great night out on the town. Anyway this, uh, friend of mine, used to find it really nice to be able to buy a cup of coffee on his way home from someone's apartment in the Elmwood Village back home to his own place in Allentown at those ungodly hours of the morning. I mean, I love stores like Everything Elmwood, Homeward Bound, and Room as much as the next guy. But who's going to offer a bit of respice to those of us who still stay out past 2:00 AM (now if only occasionaly) if not those places? Come on people, remember when you were young?!

  25. Joshua

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:01

    gaustad - totally agree with your assessment of crime on elmwood. yes, the crime not as bad as some of the worst parts on the east side, but there is crime. A similar problem in the parkside neighborhood.

    In regards to the parking lot in front of wilson farms and it's aesthetics - I really don't think any of that has come to mind. I guess it was just not a very important thing to me. The important thing to me is the practicality of the store itself and I think it severs that purpose.

    In regards to the old elmwood sandwiches and bagles - maybe timmy ho's should move in there.

  26. Buffalopundit

    9 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:07

    Comment of the year:

    Wtf.... its a convenient store. Your pretentious urban design doesnt apply.... Next thing ya know u guys are goin to ask for gas stations built to the curb with pumps in back

  27. platt4

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:28

    Moron of the Year- The commenter awarded 'Comment of the Year' above. That IS the trend in gas station design elsewhere.

  28. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:33

    thanks buffpundit!

  29. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:42

    platt that's why ur stuck in buffalo right? Don't hate... Get ur tinfoil Stanley cup blue wig and bills zubas and go cheer the bills

  30. icecreamsub

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 09:46

    new winner of Comment of the year:

    Moron of the Year- The commenter awarded 'Comment of the Year' above. That IS the trend in gas station design elsewhere.

  31. sbrof

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 10:02

    Creating good urban design shouldn't be limited be the use of the building. It is the lack of proper zoning and guidelines in this town that has created a downtown where there is nothing to do but park your car. Streets that are so wide they can't be maintained. Buildings that instead of add to the beauty of our city detract from it.

    People keep saying we should be more like this city or that city. Well design guidelines are a hugely important part of creating the types of cities people want to be in. People like to think the market rules all, but there are always some sort of government policy influencing everything. Streets, gas prices, taxes, insurance, everything is regulated. The point is a convenience store would still be in this location even if it had to spend 10% more designing something great.

  32. mmiller

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 10:10

    I predict that in another 30 years, when these suburban styled stores are in danger of being demolished in favor of some new sidewalk forward newbuilds, Tim Tielman will begin a campaign to preserve them and put pedestrian walkways on their the roofs. :)

  33. leadi

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 10:10

    Whether people choose to boycott Wilsons Farms on Elmwood (totally ridiculous) the one at the Corner of Elmwood and Auburn is the busiest in the entire chain. This info came directly from a top manager at Tops when they still owned the chain. We shop at WIlson Farms regularly during the week for things we run out of. It is CONVENIENT for us not to drive to Wegman's for a 1/2 gallon of milk or dozen eggs.

    Queenseyes - it is ridiculous to ask or suggest that a company to tear down a building and start from scratch. What if someone told you to tear down Thunderbay on Elmwood and start from scratch versus opening your stores at the malls a few years back? How you would have reacted ? It is not the communities job to redesign a private business or to suggest that people do not shop somewhere.

    Here we go again, everyone....."get out your torches and kill the monster!" The monster here: Wilson Farms because they want to update their stores.

    Honestly - if there is a huge snowstorm and I need some basics to get through a few days, I don't care what the store looks like.

    BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME - you are cracking me up!

  34. Joshua

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 11:02

    leadi - you hit the nail on the head!

  35. DanielSack

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 11:30

    Gas stations don't have buildings to build to the sidewalk. "Service stations" (not many left) do. The buildings of gas stations are "convenience stores". When Forever Elmwood insisted, and the City agreed, Sunoco built their new convenience store at the sidewalk at Elmwood and Hodge.

    The financial model for a mixed use multiple story building with apartments above the store is simple and exists everywhere. Charge the necessary rent for the apartments and they will be rented quickly - especially on Elmwood.

  36. davvid

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 12:35

    leadi is right on. Also, this "kill the monster" sensibility is so popular on Buffalo Rising in a way that I don't really encounter too much in everyday non-internet conversations in Buffalo. I find that the most folks will take a more pragmatic stanse. I'm pleasently surprised by all of the comments that value the practical functions that Wilson Farms does well.

  37. tjc246

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 12:52

    BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME- as Daniel Sack just stated the Sunoco at Elmwood and Hodge was built to the sidewalk with their pumps on the side of the site. Not only did Forever Elmwood (now Elmwood Village Association) also got them to wrap the building in brick verses "Dryvit".

    The ideal situation here would be to build a multi-story parking ramp with Wilson Farms at the corner of Elmwood and Auburn and other stores south of that along the sidewalk of Elmwood. The difficulty is of course how do you do this without lost revenue to Wilson Farms during the construction phase.

    Another idea would be to build the building to the corner and have the parking along the side of the site so the parking lot is not behind the store but along the side of it like the Co-Op.

    Just my two cents.

  38. sbrof

    9 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 13:12

    I am not for boycotting them or forcing them to tear down but at some point this building is going to get old and need to get torn down. It wasn't constructed to last 50 or 100 years. When that does happen though they shouldn't be allowed to rebuild the same way they have. There are simple rules to creating vibrant urban neighborhoods. Buffalo has chosen to let the market rule and not enforce policies that would create these neighborhoods. What we end up with is dying commercial streets with suburban infill developments around the city. This is self defeating in the end.

    The second two leading economies on the planet (Germany and Japan) both have high taxes and strict urban design guidelines. it isn't exactly hurting their economies but what it does do is create world class cities that people from all over the world fly to see and experience.

    But then again they have pride in their cities and their home countries, supporting their own economies as much as possible while creating progressive policies that spur new industries to grow. We just continue to be a market whore and buy what is cheapest products, knowing that doing so is slowly ruining our economies. When you go to Germany you don't see made in china stickers on everything. It is practically illegal to import rice and other products from china into Japan. Both countries have higher life expectancies, better health care and education systems that make ours a joke (below the university level at least).

    Government policies affect everything in our lives, if that means telling someone they have to build a nice building so the "whole city" benefits along with the business so be it.

  39. xosder

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 13:28

    It doesn't seem like it will be that difficult to bring it to the street & have some parking on the side ala Co-Op.

  40. leadi

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 14:05

    I am pretty sure the Co-op spent well over 1 Million $$ on their new building. They worked for several years to get member loans, special financing and national Co-op financing just to get started. They kept going with membership drives, loans, etc to finish the project. This was not a cheap or easy project. It does look fantastic. However, I am going to bet Wilson farms has not budgeted over a million $$ for a complete demolition and new build of one building on Elmwood. Come on....think about what you are asking of them.

    How about this - let's wait and see. They are pretty big chain so I am sure they are following national trends. They most likely have a team of designers and/or consultants hired for these updates. I am going to trust they will go a great job.

    Let's not micromanage everything in the "village" and trust that they will do a good job? They employ a lot of people from the neighborhood that might not otherwise be able to get to a job that they couldn't walk or ride a bike to.

  41. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 14:31

    for the record my uncle was the GC of the sunoco on elmwood and if that's what u hippies call urban then u can have it. And btw the brick on sunoco is veneer and there isnt a shred of urban design there except for the panhandlers and weekler robbery there... Ask patrons of Nektar how beneficially urban that sunoco is.. U guys are Jackasses iceyhotpieholecreamsub don't u have a hoagie to make at steakout right now? Hurry the f up cuz I'm hungry biatch!!!!

  42. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 14:37

    Germany and japan are great comparisons cuz u know buffalo is just pumping out high end automobiles like Germany and japan... A nice 82 smokey and the bandit TransAm with a 97 rock sticker is rolling off the assembly line right now!!! LOL

  43. platt4

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 14:43

    Moron of the year ^^^^ trying for 2008 too.

  44. Greetingcard

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 14:51

    I have been a long time reader but have never posted before, but this just takes the cake! Oh my god, it is a Wilson Farms! Everyone needs to step back and realize that! Why do you think businesses are moving off Elmwood? The insane restrictions from EVS and no parking! What's next? The Wilson Farms? Please....it is great for the neighborhood so why knock it?

  45. DanielSack

    9 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 16:22

    brokeepsblockingme Brick (and stone) has been applied as a "veneer" for a many decades. Supporting brick and stone walls can be found in 19th century buildings such as the Richardson Psych Center buildings. Brick veneer does not make brick a dishonest urban, rural, or suburban building material.

    This former hippie, meat eating, one-hemp-shirted, pickup truck driving person is skeptical that the brick veneer attracts panhandlers any more than DryVit does.

    The Sunoco AM/PM store design was better than what existed and better than what was proposed. I'm baffled as to why BRO doesn't really block comments by "brokeepsblockingme"! I guess they figure another number on the counter equals more advertising dollars. What they should know is that such "contributors" actually convince some people to never log on to BRO.

    There is a solution on the shovel ready parking lots south of the Farm for building a good new building while keeping their present building in operation. What is required is the Farm owners have to have the will to build well and the City has to enforce their 2006 Comphehensive Plan.

    Greetingcard - the neighborhood is "great" because of the buildings that are not like the Farm building, not because of buildings like it. And what evidence do you have that businesses have moved from Elmwood because of any restrictions? New World moved from Elmwood for more space at a cheaper price - they had plenty of parking. Fleet Feet moved for more space - parking wasn't a problem there either - only a perceived problem by some writers here.

  46. sbrof

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 16:55

    ^^^ exactly, people shop on elmwood because of the atmosphere and vitality that its building fabric and density provide NOT because of the access to parking in front of the stores. If that is their main reason for shopping at one place or another they will always choose the mall. Parking isn't a battle the city can win, what we can win is providing a higher density of stores, shops, and attractions in a beautiful outdoor setting filled with people and life. Not a place that is sterile and has age, clothing and behavior restrictions posted at the entrance.

  47. leadi

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 17:19

    DanielSack - I am pretty sure BRO only edits for racial ephitats or extremely vulgar language, as it should. One should not be "edited" (I think it is also called censorship?) just because you don't agree with what they are writing. Doesn't that go against your former Hippie values? I mean geez...back in the 60's and 70's I am pretty sure that the hippies were fighting for freedom of expression and speech among numerous other issues? No?

    BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME may not write what YOU want to read, but I highly doubt it keeps people from signing on. I enjoy reading another point of view, whether I agree with it or not. I am certainly not going to ask for censorship because I disagree.

    About that parking lot on the South side of Wilson Farms: last I heard, WF does not own it: Benchmark does and I believe they have been very unreasonable and unwilling to develop that parcel in the past. I believe that parking in that lot is part of the leases of the businesses across the street, (Blockbuster, Brodo, New World, Spot). Anyone know if all of that is still true?

    DanielSack - by the way - last time I heard, the "guidelines" that Forever Elmwood had were not actually City building code guidelines. Therefore, a new build was not required to follow those guidelines in the past. Is that stil true or did that change?

    sbrof - I agree that when the time comes to rebuild that particular building, the City code/zoning/permits depts. should step in to make sure the new building meets any new requirements and/or guidelines.

  48. DanielSack

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 18:03

    leadi - editing and censorship are completely different. I totally agree that freedom of speech is important and worth fighting for. I also believe that for a medium to be valuable to an audience it must be edited. That is why newspapers, magazines, books, and news broadcasts have editors.

    I believe that brokeepsblockingme has every constitutional right to write, "U guys are Jackasses iceyhotpieholecreamsub don't u have a hoagie to make at steakout right now? Hurry the f up cuz I'm hungry biatch!!!!"

    But I question the value on this forum for such a comment (whatever it may mean) that I quote above.

    Contrary to what I suppose you thought by my comment I don't mind at all comments that don't agree with my opinions. But if I were to read or hear such comments in the New York Times or NPR I would seriously consider not reading/listening to them.

    The EVA "Design Guidelines" are not yet part of the City Charter. No building, by the current law, must comply with them. Of course it should be pointed out that planning and zoning rules that are part of the City Charter are routinely ignored by the City even when they are informed of violations!

    Yes the parking lot is owned by Benchmark. When "land value taxation" becomes law the parking lot will be built on because the taxes will be too high to maintain it as a parking lot. Wishful thinking - I know.

  49. ChocolateShake

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 19:08

    I suppose certain "former hippies" (i.e. hypocrites that will force rigid rules upon others they themselves will not follow) support 1st Amendment protections so long as the ideas expressed do not dissent from that which is popular. Censorship does nothing to enhance the marketplace of ideas. Mr. Sack's suggestion of filtering opinions that are not to his liking is nothing more than "soft" fascism.

    I just want to be able to get my coffee, cheap beer, bread and milk. Leave Wilson Farms alone... they are one of the few establishments that offers *essential goods* (emphasis added) at a *reasonable price* (emphasis added).

    Sometimes convenience is everything.

  50. AtwaterLouse

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 19:31

    ChocolateShake and BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME are correct.

    If WF ever moved their parking lot to the back of the store as QE insists in the article, it would significantly reduce their customer flow and revenues, which in turn would soon result in smaller product inventory, higher prices, and worse service. Not to mention increased dangers to customers in the mugging lot, uhhh I mean parking lot, behind the store. Many people would just keep driving past WF and go to Wegmans - especially after dark.

  51. chiknlil

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 19:34

    SBROF said: "When that does happen though they shouldn't be allowed to rebuild the same way they have. There are simple rules to creating vibrant urban neighborhoods."

    Can we see these rules? All I have ever seen were opinions from designers and planners who have never operated a business in their lives. Has the Junior League of Urban Planning put out the rules of etiquette for the City? What's next, turn the entire Elmwood Village into one big home owner's association with the obligatory member Nazis who run around and cite people for not conforming with the rules? Seriously, where are these rules?

  52. jen

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 19:53

    It canbe done different and still be urban, please see The Parker's Market Urban Gourmet, 222 Drayton St., Savannah- http://www.parkersav.com/livepages/38.shtml. Parking is offstreet. Prepared foods, wine, beer, and a small gift shop along with a variety of dry goods.

  53. leadi

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 19:59

    DanielSack..,,you have entered an entirely new domaini in media. Laws and regulations (and editing and censorship) that previously applied to the standard (hippie) media outlets no longer apply to electronic media such as "blogs". In case you missed it, the laws cannot keep up with how fast technology is developing. They can't even keep up with the illegal aspects of the internet let alone censor/edit if BROKEEPSLBOCKINGME said something offensive as a blogger.

    As far as far as your comment "That is why newspapers, magazines, books, and news broadcasts have editors." My answer is: Isn't the Chicago Post closing in a few days (12/31/07) because it can no longer keep up with current media techonology? So....I guess the editor is out of a job, huh? Maybe BR can hire their soon to be past editor to help edit out content you think is inappropriate?

    By the time you get that recycled scrap called the NYTimes in the AM, the news is completely old and outdated. I have already watched all of the national and world business news on the Bloomberg index by 6:00AM and read current local events on BRO and other stuff on NYTimes online. As a matter of fact, I can wake up in the middle of the night and watch just about any worldwide news station (foreign countried Included) and get up to the minute news without ever picking up a newpaper.

    Once again, I enjoy reading other view points on this blog - whether I agree with them or not - yours included.

  54. DanielSack

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 23:39

    I guess leadi and chocolate shake simply can't read. If they reread what I wrote they will see I'm in no way discouraging different opinions. I am discouraging, but not proposing to outlaw, comments like, "U guys are Jackasses iceyhotpieholecreamsub don't u have a hoagie to make at steakout right now? Hurry the f up cuz I'm hungry biatch!!!!" Is that a "viewpoint"?

    Perhaps I'm too out of date to understand how that adds to the discussion about a Wilson Farm store!

    People really think that there is no editing in the electronic media? The value of editing shows up when you can obtain accurate information - like knowing that it is the Cincinnati Post closing shop, not the Chicago Post mentioned by "leadi" who must believe the Bloomberg index and New York Times online have not been edited.

    Seriously "chiknlil", you can easily find the rules you must think are a secret. You can cruise the internet or go to the library to find information about urban planning. You can read the City's 2006 Comprehensive Plan (on-line) to know what the City says about planning. You can also obtain the City Charter on-line to know precisely what the laws are. The Elmwood Village Association website has information about the proposed updates to the City's laws regarding building design.

  55. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 23:42

    dansack still subscribes to the liberal media bias that dominates tv... He watches CNN reads the NY Times and is saving for a Prius with a big gold eagle on the hood called Greeny and the Bandit...

  56. ChocolateShake

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 24th 2007, 23:58

    If running an effective convenient store was so easy then why is it that nobody on here who has posted has ever risked their *own* capital in such a venture? Again, its easy to be critical when its not your money at risk. Put up or go pound salt.

  57. ChocolateShake

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 00:12

    Mr. Sack.. this forum is not the NYT or NPR and the reporting reflects that fact. Satire is the background noise in the marketplace of ideas. Who is to determine such an arbitrary standard of what is a vaild and invalid comment? BRO has limited time to research, write, edit and post articles, nonetheless, critique what Charlie from Cheektowaga or Henrietta from Hertel has posted on a discussion board.

    I would argue the only time any editing should be done is when said speech would cause immediate harm or malice. While there have been outrageous comments posted on BRO in the past, I have yet to encounter *anything* that has crossed that line.

    I respectfully disagree with your point of view. If you disagree with the words or ideas expressed in a post, simply skip to the comment. This forum should not be limited to the words or ideas that do not annoy, shock or offend you. Furthermore, what might be annoying, shocking or offensive to you might very well be entertaining, comical or informative to another.

    Have a blessed day and a Merry Christmas!

  58. Denizen

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 00:40

    Ahhh....the Wil-Fo. I have a love/dislike relationship with this uber-convenient "neccessities" store just down the block from where I live; It's a sharp contrast to most of the other neaby businesses that sell good which are marginal at best to people's everyday needs. I love being able to walk a block to grab cheap beer or the Sunday paper. At the same time, the store's aged-design and spacehog auto-centrism throws a monkey-wrench in the otherwise surging energy this group of blocks has seen grow in recent years.

    With the exception a few boneheaded, unproductive comments, this is a pretty good discussion. Seems to me like the age-old "nature vs. nurture" debate.

    The extreme end of the "Nature" POV expressed here is that so-called "markets" should decide how a city is built and no godamn pinko commie, Subaru-driving, elitist, America-hating, social engineering planners should dare use their professional expertise to help guide the development of a city's built environment into a better place for everyone. Damn the common good.

    At the other end of the spectrum, the "Nurturists"

  59. chiknlil

    9 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 00:54

    DanielSack wrote" "Seriously "chiknlil", you can easily find the rules you must think are a secret. You can cruise the internet or go to the library to find information about urban planning. You can read the City's 2006 Comprehensive Plan (on-line) to know what the City says about planning. You can also obtain the City Charter on-line to know precisely what the laws are. The Elmwood Village Association website has information about the proposed updates to the City's laws regarding building design"

    These are not rules, they are opinions and current trends. The City plan does not say anything about building all mixed-use buildings to the street with rear-parking. Sbrof stated that there are simple rules to urban planning, other than a few opinions by some trendy authors, I still haven't seen them. The EVA hasn't changed the laws to date, they have some ideas, but they are hardly a comprehensive set of rules that will turn Elmwood into a vibrant urban landscape. Thanks for playing though.

  60. AtwaterLouse

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 01:03

    Jen - That's an attractive store in Savanah you linked to, but I don't see parking in pic. Maybe it's on other side? Looks like a higher end store than WF (wine, walk-in beer cooler, upscale prepared foods) which maybe helps pay for better building and interior. I wonder if location is wealthier area than Buffalo EV.

    Seems to me the WF business model (about half way between We Never Close store at lower end and Parker's in Savanah at a higher end) is based on high volume of not-as-high scale products, depending on customer flow and decent sized parking lot. As I commented I think lot needs to be in front. Maybe some day if building is rebuilt parking could safely move to a side somehow, but I think same people would still complain if it stays same size.

    It might not be practical to pay for appearance as nice as Parkers with profit margins generated by these WFs. Probably some more affordable cosmetic upgrades are feasible and new WF owners might make some. But I don't think appearance is what really bothers most critics. It's the parking.

  61. AtwaterLouse

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 01:07

    Damn the common good.

    I think the Wilson Farms at Elmwood/Auburn contributes a LOT more the the "common good" than does the to-the-sidewalk, zero-parking-space We Never Close store at Elmwood/Bird. Perhaps Denizen thinks the opposite.

  62. Denizen

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 01:20

    oops, my comment got cut off, damn laptops and their ultra-sensitive buttons. continued...

    At the other end of the spectrum, the "Nurturists" like to believe that cities are the way they are since the dawn of civilization due to the infallible intuition of planning geniuses. Every beautiful urban nuance we find in the world's greatest cities is because some dude who reads his Jane Jacobs every night calculated how far everything should be set back from the street, how many parking spaces should or shouldn't exist, how many rows of tress on boulevard islands, ect. Just install enough bump-outs and bike lanes on the best streets and business will flock to your city like there is no tomorrow!

    The less-than-glamorous reality is mix of both. Cities develop when and where they are needed to fulfill the economic and social necessities of the time. Though, urban planning has been employed by idealistic rules since..like.. the dawn of civilization. Urban Planning is probably the world's second oldest profession. Well, maybe just the armchair variety.

    With that said, the ol' Wil-Fo' provides a practical need for a neighborhood seriously in need of walkable (yeah yeah I know it has parking in front of it) necessities retailers. But we must also take into account the aggregative activity from land on this part of Elmwood. If the city ever got it's shit together, it would seriously consider implementing a land-value taxation system, as Dan Sack points out above. Land should be taxed for its economic potential, not merely what's build (or not) upon it. And trust me, the Wil-Fo' parcel has a lot more potential than what's being realized in its current state. That amount of turf could be supporting a building with at least 4 successful businesses and some nice apartments above, and maybe even a small parking ramp for good measure. Local governments have the power to grow balls and use them. In this case, assess that property for how well it easily could be performing, and watch the owner quickly either sell it off or develop it into a more efficient use.

    Oh and one more thing to top of my late-night long-windedness. The idea that a convenience store can't be built up to the street is pure nonsense. We Never (card) close has been open for years and last I checked they don't have any off-street parking.

    And finally one last thing for Gaustad. Anyone who calls the EV "Downtown" probably lives in the suburbs. Though, I'm not making any assumptions here.

  63. AtwaterLouse

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 02:09

    Nobody ever said it "can't" be built without a parking lot, but there's very real business consequences to We Never Close for that. They get mostly walk-up beer customers, a much smaller portion of customers for food items (most adults just drive past it and go to Wegmans or some other store that has parking). Thus in terms of prices and products, We Never Close can't provide anywhere near the benefits to EV residents that Wilson Farms provides. Wilson Farms obviously is no Tops or Wegmans but it's a big step up over We Never Close.

    The idea that a convenience store can't be built up to the street is pure nonsense. We Never (card) close has been open for years and last I checked they don't have any off-street parking.

    That business model works for them apparently at that's fine for beer and a sandwich, but does it serve the 'greater good' more than the Wilson Farms at Auburn? How many EV residents would swap Wilson Farms at Auburn for a clone of We Never Close at that spot in all its to-the-curb-zero-parking glory? 1 or 2 percent?

  64. knock_knock

    10 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 02:30

    Sbrof, your “100%” on target. I’ve been outside of america you see McDonalds, Pizzia Hut, Kmart in 300 buildings they seem to do ok. The problem is in america, people bitch if they have to pay a penny more than they think they should pay. They start crying the blues the cost of living no matter the social cost of the community ( Crappy looking architecture, slave wages, shitty work hours because people can’t think 2 seconds ahead in life and demand 24 hour service. Charge an extra .05 an idem and build a nice looking building in sink with the neighborhoods your in. When Wilson Farms was a part if Top Markets / Royal Ahold. They had no problem charging more for their products that all came from the same distributors.

  65. knock_knock

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 02:32

    Thats 300 year old buildings

  66. IamMe

    11 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 02:48

    Of most industrialized nations we rank the bottom in quality of life in all categories. Life expectancy, health care, vacation time, and 6-7 hour work days. They demand better even if it costs a little more. We DEMAND a better looking building!!!

  67. IamMe

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 02:49

    Of most industrialized nations we rank the bottom in quality of life in all categories. Life expectancy, health care, vacation time, and shorter work days. They demand better even if it costs a little more. We should DEMAND a better looking building!!!

  68. icecreamsub

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 09:33

    We Never Close is a craphole store but it serves a purpose, catering to students and other people up late looking for beer, cigerettes, a square sliced pizza in plastic wrap.... Rite Aid on elm/bryant on the other hand is a bigger eye sore in my opinion. I always felt ashamed patronizing such an ugly business, but you can't beat their price of beer or the convenience it provides...Its a shame it has to look the way it that it does.

  69. ChocolateShake

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 13:10

    How can we DEMAND a San Francisco or Portland building design when we have a Flint, MI or Youngstown, OH economy? It's easier to DEMAND something when you have NOTHING to lose. Again, what caliber of designs would you expect from a building that sells cheap beer, bread, milk and condoms? If demand was so great for business operations on the corner of Summer/Elmwood then why isn't there a Tiffany's or Cartier at that allegedly sought after location?

    Business operations are done with anticipation of generating profits. Wilson Farms is NOT a 401(c) non-profit. We have seen the designs, lets see the business plans that can support the higher costs associated with the DEMANDED designs...

    The silence is deafening.....

  70. knock_knock

    9 ratings12345
    Dec 25th 2007, 13:32

    If you haven’t noticed Property values in the Elmwood village have doubled in the past decade and surrounding areas are improving, Vs the rest of western NY has stagnant -declining property values. If you haven’t noticed there higher end shops and restraints are in this areas. If you haven’t noticed people from outside this area are taking notice of the Elmwood village and not for cookie cutter chain stores.