On This Day, October 25, 2006: Buffalo’s Asthma Epidemic; Can it Bridge a Community?

On This Day, October 25, 2006: Buffalo’s Asthma Epidemic; Can it Bridge a Community?

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

The West Side of Buffalo is speedily being considered for major changes in its landscape which seek to offset a residential tax base community area close to the Peace Bridge and allow its bridge operational expansion.

Questions remain over the debate of the effect the 24-7 idling diesel trucks have with their diesel particulate emissions following a trail of southwesterly winds combing an entire west side of Buffalo.

A renowned University of Buffalo professor and medical doctor specializing in asthma delivered a report On This Day, October 25, a year ago to the American College of Chest Physicians on the incidence of asthma among youth in WNY.

Jamson S. Lwebuga-Mukasa MD, PhD’s study, “Crude Asthma Incidence Rates Among Buffalo, NY Children” cited that Western New York and the City of Buffalo residents “have high asthma prevalence and health care utilization rates for asthma.”

The purpose of this study was to determine the crude asthma incidence rate among children. A cross-sectional study design was used. An 18-item survey including demographic information, asthma diagnosis, asthma symptoms, health care utilization and household triggers were included. Crude incidence was defined as the percentage of new cases of asthma diagnosed by a physician in the past 12 months over the total number of children without previously diagnosed asthma.

RESULTS: The study reports that “there were 5427 children ages 4 to 14 years, mean 7.6 _2.7 included in the analysis. Of the children, 38% were African American, 24% Caucasian, 24% Latino/Hispanic, and 14% other race/ethnicity; 49% were males. The overall crude asthma incidence was 8.2%. There was a 22.3% overall asthma prevalence. Latino/Hispanics had the highest crude asthma incidence, 14.0% compared to 6% for African Americans, 6.7% for Caucasians and 6.8% for other race (x2_63.03, df_3, p_.00). A logistic regression analysis indicated that the reported presence of allergy symptoms (B_2.8, S.E._.13, p_.00), cockroaches in the home (B_.59, S.E._.25, p_.02), being of Latino/Hispanic decent (B_.775, S.E._.14, p_.00), and having a mother with diagnosed asthma (B_.58, S.E._.15, p_.00), were most strongly associated with newly diagnosed asthma. Pets in the home, mice/rat infestations, home environmental tobacco smoke exposure and carpeting were not statistically significant in the model.”

CONCLUSION: Latino/Hispanic children residing in the City of Buffalo have a high crude asthma incidence rate.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: It was determined that a prospective cohort study investigating the genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors that directly contribute to the clinical onset of asthma is needed.

For the record, Dr. Llewbuga-Mukasa is affiliated with the Center for Asthma and Environmental Exposure, Lung Biology Research Program, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Kaleida Health Buffalo General Divis, Buffalo, New York.

In another well known (internationally) abstract entitled: “Traffic volumes and respiratory health care utilization among residents in close proximity to the Peace Bridge before and after September 11, 2001,” Dr. Llewbuga-Mukasa reported the following findings in the Journal of Asthma:

A recent study based on data over a 10-year period (1991-2000) showed a positive association between health care utilization and prevalence of asthma, and commercial traffic at a U.S.-Canada border crossing. We wanted to determine whether decreases in total traffic would also be associated with decreases in health care utilization for respiratory illnesses.

Following September 11, 2001, there was a 50% drop in total traffic at the Peace Bridge border crossing point between Buffalo, New York and Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada. To investigate the impact of such a traffic decline on health care utilization for respiratory illnesses, weekly respiratory admissions to Kaleida Health System, Western New York's largest health care provider were analyzed according to ICD9CM classification and compared with total weekly traffic volumes for 3-month periods in 2000 and 2001 (August, September, and October).

The total number of patients admitted to hospital or seen in emergency departments for respiratory illnesses during the 3-month periods of both years was 5288. A 50% drop in total traffic following Labor Day and September 11, 2001, from week 4 to week 7 was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.031) when a one-way ANOVA was performed. Likewise, the drop in total respiratory cases approached statistical significance (p = 0.052) when a one-way ANOVA was conducted.

The results suggest an association between decrease in traffic volumes with decrease in health care utilization for respiratory diseases. These results suggest that current levels of traffic may be impacting on the respiratory health of residents in the nearby community.”

Teams from Harvard and Clarkson have come to Buffalo’s west side to study the asthma prevalence in recent years. It seems to be a veritable Ground Zero for asthma and respiratory distresses.

I spoke to Dr Chris Somers from McMaster’s University in Hamilton about his report on diesel particulates combing off the QEW in that region. His widely reported study showed two sets of lab mice whereby one was provided with HEPA air purification filtering, and the other was allowed to take in the off-highway particulate-filled air, which resulted in abnormal genetic offspring. Speculate easily that the same conditions, doubled by a constant air flow of diesel particulates over the west side landscape, must have deleterious health effects.

Is there an option to the ongoing problems that are sure to only get worse if the bridge expands as planned?

Well, there may just be a solution, though it’s rarely optioned in public discourse. But what if, just say, we were to rebuild a dynamic new bridge where the current Peace Bridge stands. And what if the Ambassador Bridge were also built, with its eager private funds? Now what if the Peace Bridge allowed car traffic and the Ambassador controlled all the truck traffic?

The Ambassador Bridge is designed to build the trade and manufacturing sector of the commercial and industrial district it seeks to find home upon; which in effect lures business development where it is needed the most. Currently the Peace Bridge trucks don’t even stop for gas as they move on from our area.

That could be a good health solution, in a nutshell. All other arguments serve only good wealth solutions—but to whose wealth? Not yours or mine.

Supporting the Peace Bridge intentions without proper debate is all rather like the scene of the nervous mayor in the movie Jaws who desperately tells the sheriff:

“This is tourist season, damnit—don’t mention the word shark again. My very own kids will be here tomorrow swimming on this very beach.” (sort of like: “There’s no diesel particulate issue—and even if there were, the particulates are tiny—so have a deep breath, and build the damn bridge!”)

Those ever so tiny particulates are among the most prevalent and poisonous human intakes on earth. Lawsuits are popping up in Japan and elsewhere over diesel particulates poisoning communities. Asthma experts the world over agree to its exacerbating consequences on asthma.

Yet Buffalo is moving ahead in a direction that would seem we don’t have a choice.

Do we?

If we could really openly bridge this debate, we might yet see two beautiful bridges being built. One would be for cars, community and good health; the other, a ways down river, for trucks, industry and commerce that engages Buffalo to the world.

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. comptart_lws

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 15:53

    Beautifully stated Bill. Even if a person doesn't think the health issue will really affect them, they must realize that the cost of an epidemic affects ALL of us in health care and tax rates. The PBA and traditional media only spoon-feed the public a "need" for expediency & smoke-and-mirrors renderings of "progress", The PBA-preferred Alternative 1B-R3 has a $330 million budget on paper but, what are the hidden costs in health care, lost business-development opportunity and shattered self-esteem of an entire GATEWAY city?

  2. VoiceOfReason

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 17:22

    There are homes at both locations. What difference does it make if the truck fumes are expelled at one site vs the other? Would this health "epidemic" cost less if the bridge was located 2 miles down the road?

    Also...

    AS POSTED IN THE BUFFALO NEWS

    Further waiting will not change bridge, plaza facts By Paul Koessler and Ron Rienas

    The Oct. 17 Donn Esmonde article does not accurately portray the situation at the Peace Bridge and does not justify any further delays.

    While Liz Martina is portrayed as acting in the best interests of the neighborhood, she sued the Peace Bridge Authority to stop the border infrastructure improvements that relocated the tolls to Canada, reconfigured the U.S. plaza, relocated the Duty Free and resulted in improvements to Front Park. These changes have had positive benefits on the neighborhood and will ultimately allow for a new, smaller U.S. plaza.

    The dispersions cast upon the authority are puzzling because this is not really an authority project. The reason for the expanded plaza is to accommodate the needs of the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies by building modern, secure customs facilities that allow them to perform their national security function while facilitating easier and quicker access for the vast Canadian market that Buffalo wants to sell to.

    Even the new bridge, while meeting long-term transportation requirements, is part of the border security system in that it will allow lanes to be dedicated to expedited traveler programs.

    The authority pursued the relocation of U.S. Customs to Canada for three years because we, too, believed it was the best solution. We have concluded that the likelihood of this occurring is virtually nonexistent regardless of who is in the White House. This Customs relocation requires compliance with the Canadian constitution, meaning that U.S. Customs would perform its work at a different, lesser standard at the Peace Bridge than at any other land border crossing.

    Ask any of the presidential candidates if they would give up some antiterrorism tools (i.e., fingerprinting) at the Peace Bridge. Ask them if they are prepared to have Department of Homeland Security defend their border actions and procedures in a foreign (Canadian) court. No amount of waiting will change the obvious conclusion.

    The reference to exhaust fumes from trucks fails to recognize new technology that has dramatically decreased emissions. All 2007 model year engines have reduced soot by 90 percent and nitrous oxide by 50 percent. The Canadian Trucking Association and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency unveiled the next generation of trucks that by 2010 will virtually eliminate smog emissions.

    As for a truck crossing downriver, that alternative was extensively studied as part of the environmental impact statement. It was unanimously rejected for several reasons, not the least of which is that another country and another community also have a say in this decision. We are embarking upon a community improvement plan that will guide the investment of some $25 million to make neighborhood enhancements outside of the project area. Waiting will not change the facts.

    Paul Koessler is vice chairman of the Buffalo and Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority. Ron Rienas is general manager.

    Sounds to me like these plans are all to speed up truck and auto processing and in turn decrease the amount of vehicle idling. How can that be viewed as a bad thing? Better infrastructure = less pollution. Makes sense to me.

    Shattered self-esteem? Yes it will be very disheartening to have a beautiful new bridge and a faster and more efficient plaza like they have in Canada.

  3. comptart_lws

    4 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 18:10

    The disheartening aspect would be if the truck traffic and plaza is squished onto what could have been a reclaimed historic asset — instead of having trucks re-located to an area where there is enough space to properly remediate the deisel exhaust. The "Front" and Fort Porter could co-exist with an auto/bike/pedestrian crossing AND become a beautiful Gateway entrance — while, the trucks could be handled downstream in an environmentally neutral way that might make Buffalo a "model city" for such technology. How is that not a win-win-win compared to 1B?

  4. zimmermann

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 18:53

    Dear VoiceOfReason,

    Your comment is most awe-conspiring-- who wrote this drivel, Tokyo Rose? There are millions of trucks that are definitely nor covered in this meager myopic resolution. We're literally asthma-youth death-defining decades away from eco-value truck emission resolves, not 2010. Sorry, but that's the truth.

    Your quote:

    "The reference to exhaust fumes from trucks fails to recognize new technology that has dramatically decreased emissions. All 2007 model year engines have reduced soot by 90 percent and nitrous oxide by 50 percent. The Canadian Trucking Association and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency unveiled the next generation of trucks that by 2010 will virtually eliminate smog emissions."

    Just not true.

  5. Hoss

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 19:58

    Moving the bridge 1.5 miles up the line will just affect another neighborhood. It may be further from your neighborhood, but it's closer to someone else's kids. The best place for a truck plaza (if it's really even needed) would be on Grand Island. restrict the Peace bridge to cars and bikes only.

  6. BuffaloRox

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 20:21

    As has been pointed out in your earlier piece on the Ambassador Bridge Group, you are merely shifting the problem from one area (West Side) and to another (Black Rock). Your articles solely focus on the purported benefits of moving the bridge and plaza down river and neglect to discuss with the same critical eye the damage that it will cause to Black Rock and neighborhoods along the Scajaquada Expressway corridor. Yes, asthma rates will drop in parts of the West Side but the rates, along with traffic, will rise in Black Rock and neighborhoods along the Scajaquada Expressway corridor. With the Southwesterly winds you mention, the change of the bridge plaza shifts particulates from the lower West Side onto the Buff State campus, Grant Street neighborhood, Museum district and Elmwood strip.

    What support do you have for the claim that "The Ambassador Bridge is designed to build the trade and manufacturing sector of the commercial and industrial district it seeks to find home upon; which in effect lures business development where it is needed the most."? The Ambassador Bridge is being designed to maximize its revenues by tackling more lucrative truck crossings. Your statement is the first I've read anywhere that the ABG is trying to spin off economic development. I'd be interested in reading your source.

    I'd rather see the former industrial sites in Black Rock remediated and put back into productive use similar to the efforts in South Buffalo. The loss of land for a plaza is staggering in the ABG renderings. Buff State is right next door to the eastern boundary of the bridge plaza, the students and faculty will be directly affected by the increased noise and pollution. Also, it's only a 1/2 mile from the eastern boundary of the ABG bridge plaza to Albright-Knox, Burchfield-Penny and the Historical Society. The bridge will also tie directly into the Scajaquada and threatens efforts to downgrade it into a parkway.

  7. PBL

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 21:10

    Thank you Bill for writing an article about the health issues associated with diesel emissions. The Buffalo News certainly has not published this information which is an extremely important issue in any debate on a new plaza that will result in more trucks in any neighborhood.
    The new and improved trucks that Rienas and Koessler spoke about will not permeate the truck population until the year 2030. In the meantime, people are getting sick with asthma and breathing problems on the West Side and in many communities throughout the world. A study done in Compact, CA, found diesel emissions from trains and trucks increased the cancer rates in that community by 180%.
    Listen to this podcast from NPR:
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12847186
    So why should anyone want increased truck traffic in their neighborhood? We have had many sick people in our community around the Columbus Park neighborhood with asthma, allergies,breathing problems and cancer. Even many of our pets have had odd forms of cancer and other health issues. Most people carry around their water bottles. We carry our inhalers!
    One might think we should all be wanting to move from this sick area, but what about those left behind who will be located even closer to this elevated level of pollution? Who will be next?
    We cannot pit one neighborhood's health against another's. It is time for ALL citizens to band together and DEMAND that an appropriate alternative be developed. Do NOT tell me that the students at Buff State or the people in Black Rock deserve better health than we do. There are also two elementary schools, one high school and one college already in close proximity to the existing bridge and plaza.
    Buffalo has a chance to improve the health of the West Side. Every possible alternative must be fully explored to move this plaza and bridge project to a location that will lessen these adverse effects on any community.

  8. comptart_lws

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 22:00

    It just seems to me that with Buffalo staking a claim on high-tech and advanced science as a critical part of our renaissance, why CAN'T we expect better than "same ole thinking" on the pollution-solution? From what I understand, there are ways of capturing (even harvesting) deisel emissions — if the passage route is adequately designed to incorparate overhead vacuum and filtration devises. I'm no expert on this but, my understanding is that the RR corridor could allow such technology to be used and NO neighborhood would have to suffer. This COULD BE an opportunity to create a MODEL project that other cities would want to come here and LEARN FROM — in a good way, for a change!

  9. jimmycrackcorn

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 22:14

    So when theres less idle traffic, theres less Respiratory problems

    never would have guessed

  10. Hoss

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 25th 2007, 22:34

    For real, you think this is a "solution"?

    "Well, there may just be a solution, though it’s rarely optioned in public discourse. But what if, just say, we were to rebuild a dynamic new bridge where the current Peace Bridge stands. And what if the Ambassador Bridge were also built, with its eager private funds? Now what if the Peace Bridge allowed car traffic and the Ambassador controlled all the truck traffic?

    The Ambassador Bridge is designed to build the trade and manufacturing sector of the commercial and industrial district it seeks to find home upon; which in effect lures business development where it is needed the most. Currently the Peace Bridge trucks don’t even stop for gas as they move on from our area."

    I sometimes wonder if Buffalo Rising is just a web based viral marketing arm of the Buffalo/Niagara Partnership. It often seems like they support any private development whatsoever without any concern for all the ramifications. First he ethanol plant, and now the "ambassador bridge" plan.

    Are they (ambassador bridge folks) really factoring in the Scajaquada as the prime arterial for trucks to get to I-90. I thought they were about to (after years of study) downgrade it to a boulevard? Delaware Park is the crown jewel of Buffalo. Moving that kind of truck volume through it's core would be akin to thrusting a sword right through it's pulsing heart. Christ sakes, Rick James will be rolling in his Forest Lawn grave. Literally.

    Do we really need, to turn even more waterfront property into a friggin parking lot for idling trucks. We'd probably get what, another 60 jobs at the expense of a rebounding neighborhood, two colleges, and a historic park. If a plan such as this even got approval, I would have Matt Quagliano on the phone that day to try to find a buyer for my home. Not because I would be directly effected, but because it would without a doubt confirm the backwards thinking, back room shenanigans that this city has the reputation of embracing. A way of (dis)functioning that in the year 2007 is just plain unacceptable.

  11. zimmermann

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 00:20

    The Ambassador Bridge Project promises MORE than the PBA, and likely still less than what we need and deserve, but they do propose this:

    1. less diesel fuel particulate emmissions from less idling trucksnot needing to idle.

    2. a vented commercial outlet neighborhood for any emmisions, specially studied to not harm a residential community

    3. a geographical station and expanding lands for business to ammalgamate and grow as an international trade hub, impossible geographically a the PBA site.

    4. a taxable private enterprise

    5. competition to an authority that serves only an authority, the PBA

    I do not care about the ABP in and of itself-- whatsoever.

    I do care that 99% of Buffalo listening is listening only to PBA options thread to bear profits for the PBA alone.

    People that hold jobs and influence in Buffalo are AFRAID to upset the ship that the PBA runs.

    Hands are in every till wherever you look. Asthma kids are dying, but that's okay for those that covet looking the other way.

    I do care that this health issue is number one-- go ahead and exert pressure on the ABP-- they deserve a scrutininzed eye too-- but Do Not Let the PBA off the Health Hook.

    The asthma health issue caused by the PBA is huge. It's like watching a clock...every once in a while as time passes, a click on that clock pops up another kid with asthma...and once in a while, they die.

    That's the issue. If you have an answer for that, make it good-- because the PBA expansion only proposes an exaggerated version of the current epidemic health problems.

    Other cities have three, four or more bridges. Our PBA Troll wants only ONE. This lizard on our tired shoulders must be stopped and stomped upon.

    The PBA takes troll tolls 24-7, and gives nothing in return. They say they do, but is a tiny community PR budget that gives foolish little. They shared pants with Fort Erie's mayor and built a skate stadium and more, sure, to keep pockets happy. But the PBA does squat in reality.

    The ABP would be privately financed, run like a business, not like a communist gulag authority like the PBA.

    If anyone likes an authority agency, it's only because their connections to such a pathetic structure of rule that is totally-- Totally undemocratic-- is to their private job security they lay reverence only.

    State Auhtorities are misnomers ion a democratic society-- they are soley there for politicians to corrupt the process without public say.

    They make people afraid, weak, unwilling to express opinion. Authorities are in they very essence evil and undemocratic. Name even ONE that is good.

    What, the NFTA? Love 'em, right-- what they've done to several generations starving them from the waterfront?

    Robert Moses loved authorities too-- his own. The guy never even had a drivers license, but he ripped lives and neighborhoods equal to Hitler and Mussiolini. He was a sick minded and evil megalomaniacal fop of a greedy and worst kind of person.

    This whole issue is about health, not the wealth of a few. Build ten bridges if private funds are willing-- spread the wealth, the risk, the tax base, the region, -- and spread the diesel particulates that are killing neighborhoods.

    There is a power vacuum for voice out there. We could speak up. We could gather a voice of strength.

    When I went to the many public meetings at Buffalo Commion Council, and at Fort Erie's City Council, there were about 12 of us designates from various sources scheduled to speak at the podium against the PBA's intended plans. Against us were about an equal number but ALL of whom were paid by the PBA to speak. What does that tell you?

    It simply tells you that free voices-- from science, medicine, community, and some from the Army Corp of Engineers (although retired) were willing to speak up and voice theobvious issues...but that No One was there aany time to support the PBA unless they received a paycheck from such.

    The point is this not debatable: If you move to the West Side, you will have respiratory probklems within the first year. No one is void of this.

    Too many current studies uphold this. If you want copies of these studies, contact me at wnysail@yahoo.com . I'd be happy to oblige and help you see the facts no one wants you to see.

    Buffalo's been run over with the power of the too few too many times. We've got to take a stand this time.

  12. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 00:39

    Zimmerman acknowledging "free voices". Imagine the irony.

  13. KED

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 01:37

    While we were discussing the importance of the pollution issue (i.e., truck VOCs, PM2.5, CO, NO, toxins, etc.), I suddenly recalled watching my kids play at the tiny playground in the northwest corner of Front Park several years ago. Our playtime was interrupted by a sudden miscarriage I had in the very spot where unacceptable levels of air quality were found to exist in the air quality study. This hot zone is the wrong place for a playground. Wait a minute here - THIS PARK AND PLAYGROUND IS THE WRONG PLACE FOR TRUCKS!!!!!!

  14. comptart_lws

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 08:54

    Damp: what purpose does a smarmy comment like "Zimmerman acknowledging "free voices". Imagine the irony" serve in this discussion??? Zimmerman's comment states facts and opinions supported by personal experience and involvement. Does your pithy little comment seek to cast doubt upon his motives — imply that he might personally gain from a different bridge/plaza solution? Well guess what — we can ALL gain something if a SMART solution is achieved: a healthier community (lower health care costs), a gateway for tourism that we can design postcards around (as was done in previous generations) and a gateway for NAFTA that could open up business opportunities for citizens (taxes, jobs). Oh yeah, let's add in the aspire-higher goal of having the truck crossing so environmentally neutral that engineers from around the world come here to study it.

  15. BuffaloRox

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 11:12

    PBL,

    You make a lot of good points. Other neighborhoods don't deserve better health, but they certainly don't deserve worse. Pushing one neighborhood's problems to another, as Zimmerman seems to advocate, doesn't solve a problem. My son has asthma, not a bad case, but I understand wanting improved health. As you point out, rather than pitting neighborhoods, perhaps the threat by ABG to PBA could be used to extract improvements by the PBA. I would think this would be the kind of thing that Brian Higgins would be for and would use his position on the transportation committee (which is funding part of the new PBA bridge) to secure additional funds for improved health (e.g. capturing particulates from idling trucks).

    comptart,

    Other than perhaps Zimmerman's discussion on high asthma rates on the west side, much of what he says of ABG bridge (other than it will possibly be a taxable private enterprise and create competition with the PBA) is speculation. If it's supported by some source other than the ABG I'd be interested in it. I asked Zimmerman for it but he either missed it or ignored it. I'd be delighted to see lots more bridge crossings so that particulates are dispersed over a wider area, but I put that on my long Buffalo wish list since there's no discussion of any other bridges being built.

  16. JimKane

    2 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 13:09

    Mr. Bill Zimmerman -- Thanks for your article -- long overdue in this current "round" of discussion...

    As you so aptly put -- "quality" of the air is a result of numerous variables -- including distance from and intensity of the source -- as well as wind speed and direction. Our initial air quality investigations indicates that the impact on air quality is much less significant in the Bridgeburg - Black Rock corridor (International Rail corridor ) than it is in the Peace Bridge corridor. This will be shown in our EIS and made public for ALL to see.

    PBA officials have stated that NOT all of their air quaility studies have been made public in their DEIS and won't be made public unless someone invokes a Freedom of Information Request -- whcih, (surprise!) they don't have to respond to!! (Why? Because FOIL laws in Canada are conveniently different than the laws here! Emphasis on the word convenient. )

    What I especially liked about your article though was - - "The Ambassador Bridge is designed to build the trade and manufacturing sector of the commercial and industrial district it seeks to find home upon; which in effect lures business development where it is needed the most. Currently the Peace Bridge trucks don’t even stop for gas as they move on from our area..."

    That part of our project can never be accomplished by the forever land challenged and land-locked "public" bridge authority. They only seek to move trucks and cars through a historic residential section of Buffalo and at your expense, thank you!

    -- Jim Kane

  17. JimKane

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 13:21

    Pls add w my comment:

    Jim Kane Ambassador Niagara Signature Bridge Group Regional Director www.ambassadorniagara.com

  18. PBK

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 13:43

    When folks outside of the PBA "impact" zone act concerned but uninterested in the real story behind PBA and truck expansion, I gently remind them that our fresh water supply from Lake Erie and the River is the same water we all drink, play-in and bathe-in. Has our Water Authority weighed in on the effects of diesel fuel emission particles and toxins from the increased truck traffic? How about our County Health Commissioner? They have access to the same medical evidence and landmark court cases as we do. When are they suppose to chime in on this community health crisis? Isn't that what we pay taxes for? My community's health problems have been locked in a closet for 20 years. Our silence has been bought and paid for by the Public Bridge Authority with an army of lawyers and promises to every politician for two decades of a new and improved City. Every time we open the closet door, we are attacked by the PBA, threatened with lawsuits, silenced by community leaders or a newspaper that refuses to print the truth. Ask yourself...who's in bed with the polluters? Why does our leadership allow a community to grow sicker and sicker? The PBA plays all of us, one against the other. The obstructionists v.the historians, the preservationists, the unions, the politicians and now one community over another. They have succeeded in creating the "Perfect Storm". It's time that we all start thinking out of the box. Talking about illness, death and cancer is not pretty but it's real and it won't go away. Too many of us in a 5 block radius are sick, very sick. Some have died. Our pets have died. Within 3 houses...of cancer. But no one has listened! The American Cancer Society has a new slogan, "No one deserves cancer, but every one deserves the right to fight it." Not in my neighborhood! Our health and now our homes, belong to the PBA, NAFTA, NYSDOT, commerce, monster trucks, the Mayor and Congressman Higgins. I'm not willing to die for them. No one should. Not in my neighborhood or yours.

  19. mam

    4 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 15:24

    I wonder if Mr. Paul Koessler and Ron Rienas read the following statement from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated 9/7/07 before posting comments in The Buffalo News. " Reducing emissions from diesel engines is one of the most important air quality challenges facing the country. Even with more stringent heavy-duty highway engine standards set to take effect over the next decade, over the next twenty years millions of diesel engines already in use will continue to emit large amounts of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, both of which contribute to serious public health problems. These problems are manifested by thousands of instances of premature mortality, hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks, millions of lost work days, and numerous other health impacts ".

  20. PBL

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 16:29

    What about the increased number of absences from school? Our failing students need to succeed to compete in the workforce of the future. The school system receives aide based on the attendance rate also.

    BuffaloRox - Did you know one of the strategies the PBA discussed in helping the West Side residents, is to buy air conditioners and give them to people who are suffering because of the fumes and to fix up the old cars in the neighborhoods, so they wouldn't pollute the air more? How insulting is that! Let's just keep everyone shut up inside- No children, you can't play outside or run around the parks because the pollution is too awful around our house.
    Do you think Ron Rienas' children or Paul Koessler's families have to worry about breathing polluted air where they live?

  21. PBK

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 17:43

    PBL....How interesting. Where do Koessler and Rienas live? In fact, where do the PBA board members live? Bet not on the W.S. or in BR.

  22. BuffaloRox

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 18:01

    PBL,

    I sympathize with the West Side residents that have to deal both with the PBA and pollution. It seems that a number of people on this thread are advocating for the ABG because they know the devil that is the PBA. Somehow the critical eye that is turned at the PBA becomes pie-eyed over all the promises made by the ABG. What makes anyone think that they will be any better to deal with than the PBA? I wish I knew someone that lived in Windsor, ON that knew the ABG firsthand. It's naive to think private companies can't be as arrogant as quasi-public agencies. ABG seems to be selling sunshine and lemonade. I'd like to see them put up some real info on their website.

    Don't get me wrong, if I lived next to the Peace Bridge and there was a possibility of eliminating a good chunk of pollution, I'd fight tooth and nail. However, I think all you're doing is shifting the location of the parties who will be receiving gift-wrapped air conditioners (on both sides of the border).

  23. PBK

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 18:24

    Buffalo Rox....Jim Kane from ABG frequently comments on this and other blasts. He's no dummy. In essence, what people are saying has raised the bar for ABG. The days of pulling the wool over the public eye and ramming projects down our throats is over. Jim Kane, would you agree?

  24. comptart_lws

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 18:56

    Rox — I'm not at all pie-eyed about AMG but, I do see them behaving a hell of a lot more like potential parners iin the community than the PBA has ever done! When I comment about the IRR corridor, it's is mostly without "committment" one way or the other to ANG (it's Ambassador-Niagara Group, right?) or the PBA managing it. Personally, I'd just as soon have Spitzer disassemble all Authorities starting with the PBA but… if we're stuck with them and there's resistance to private ownership, why can't State/Fed gov't mandate the PBA (or create a NEW one!) to do it there? Oh, I forgot, the PBA is trying to assert that they are not answerable to gov't (and in effect, that's why they were created — to not be influenced by partisan politics LMFAO!!!

  25. comptart_lws

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 19:05

    Jiim Kane — besides the difference in wind current and speed (IRR compared to "The Front") what, if any, technology does your group expect to incorporate to reduce the deisel burden on all liviing things? That may be putting you one the spot since you don't have the full EIS yet but, you must be considering options? We've heard nothing on the subject from the PBA.

  26. zimmermann

    3 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 19:08

    There is a pheonomenal amount of money that flows over the Peace Bridge each year-- over 25 billion-- and while millions of dollars in toll fees are collected at the PBA troll coffers, none of it stays in and for Buffalo-- we taxpayers only get the brunt of paying for the indrastucture that allows the trucks to escape away quickly.

    Since the PBA is of, by and for the people, (legally) and yet hallowed into sovereignty by the mysteries of laws not confining an Authority of the State (the reality), we're all at a grave loss of power communication.

    Our top leaders are extremely well supported by the PBA, and in essence Shut Up from defending our rights. Each of our politicians and community leaders are discretely told to pick their battles in their illustrious careers, in order to win their long strides, and if they want to play for the long haul in WNY, then just damn well stay away from the PBA! And sadly, they needs-must listen and comply, and Obey the PBA

    This issue is about health, however. Listen to the ABG-- but demand the PBA answers the health issues at hand. There's more rugs covering over the community start-up discussion attempts with the PBA than you can imagine.

    Do you know what an actuary study is? That's where GM does a prior study of how many deaths might occur if a certain vehicle enters the marketplace. Certain standards are met (sort of like a food product allowing just so many rat hairs percentage, etc). If the number of deaths resultant from expectations are low enough, the product comes off the assembly to the marketplace. The key ingredient is to avoid lawsuits, condemnation an insurance rate hikes.

    Given that actuary table background, consider that the PBA's arrogant aggression with their project is to horrifically deny the health jeopardy and assault they plague upon a rsidential west side community.

    What's more, the PBA is assertively held harmless-- they think-- because the health threats are covered up by mainstream media.

    Warren Buffet was refused co-ownership investment years ago by the owner of the ABG there, and has since refused his reporters and editors their jiournalistic rights to give a fair hearing to the ABG. What's more, the Detroit onslaught would upset the financial holds balance of the Buffalo Few who think and are probably correct in assumptions that they alone run things here.

    If millions of trucks make an entire community sick and kill several of them individually over time, ongoingly, the PBA is unapologetic to the final degree-- they are not threatened by lawsuits, nor insurance threats, nor anything as remote as legal assaults of any kind. They are impervious.

    The actuary tables are well documented that the present exisiting format is indeed killing persons on a constant qualified time clock of a schedule... they know it...ignore it...and raise halos to their collective ignorant head.

    The West Side of Buffalo is Ground Zero for asthma. It's not because of the vast industry there-- there isn't ANY at all. Heck, there's less cars per household even than in any other areas. Why then?

    When approximately 14 delegations rose to podiums at Buffalo and Fort Erie public meetings, (delegrations are merely those individuals who sought a right to speak up) they were from so varied walks of life and interests, and we each and all spoke of the PBA health threats. What was unique is that Not ONE delegation from the side supporting the PBA was not under their payroll. Cover that fact over months and years of public hearings and it makes you wonder. No, it makes you sad and victimized.

    Incidentally-- those who were community diligent enough to speak up at said meetings-- doctors, engineers, professors, homeowners, cancer and asthma patients and parents of patients, were all treated as if they were wandering wackos...community loudmouths, ignorant sloths of dreamerville, etc. Absolutely no respect.

    At the Fort Erie hearing by the Town Council a couple years back the several delegations got up one by one to speak their peace-- individuals concerned about PBA health issues, and individuals on PBA salaries--- and all were cross examined after and during their speech by the Fort Erie Mayor (whose law firm repre$ented the PBA). The Council meeting lasted from 6 pm on a Monday night until 1:05 am that night.

    I was there, and was ongoingly shocked at how the Fort Erie mayor lambasted me and each other speaker, cross examined us like a Southern Sheriff battering at a chain gang. He abused every member of his Town Council opposing him as well. He stole the several hour show. At 1:03 am, the Mayor said it's time to vote. Then, surprise; in a low gentlemanly tone of apology, the Mayor whisperingly "recused" himself from the voting process due to conflict of interest and bias. In another minute, the night was done, finished, and the Fort Erie mayor managed to badger the entire truth process on behalf of the PBA agenda.

    I've never seen a public display of idiocy and greed overtake a democratic process to this transaparent an extent. And the PBA attorneys all sat there knowing they had a lock on our tuth and voice.

    That's the sad, sick process at work here.

    There's a little school kid trying to go to sleep tonight on the west side, and he'll wake his parents if he's lucky enough to get their attention that he simply Cannot Breath. They'll call an ambulance-- he'll get pumped with drugs, and the cycle will go on.

    The clock ticks away and little kids on the west side of Buffalo are dying because of the controls of the PBA to ignore the health consequences of their ongoing actions in pursuit of money and greed.

    Thje PBA shuts down debate. The PBA buys politicians. The PBA threatens careers if anyone speaks out against them. The PBA crushes the media from opening real debate. The Buffalo News complies.

    Too many of the people who run Buffalo-- not you ar me-- know that there's a west side child or grandmother who will choke to death tonight or some night soon because they cannot breath. They know there's a woman happily seeking the pursuit of her life and career whose life will be cut short by cancer. It's all in the actuary tables. It's okay.

    Clarkson University shows this news in their medical studies. So does Harvard Universioty. So does University of Buffalo. So does McMasters University. They've ALL been to ground Zero-- the West Side.

    I don't want to cliose down the Peace Bridge. I just don't want any trucks to go over this intended car bridge.

    I don't want the trucks to harm folks in Black Rock either.

    I in fact Do want the Buffalo Community to crush the veritable wall put up by the PBA and the Media, and to Open the Discussion between the Community and the PBA and the Ambassador Bridge people.

    Make it Only a health issue first. Then get your wealth concerns underway.

    Health first.

    Otherwise, bring on the lawyers and we'll supply the scientists' studies, plus the doctors, families, patients, and petitions and we'll take it another way...because one thing is for sure-- unless you kill us with asthma or otherwise, we are not going away.

    We're going to gather, assimilate, and class act if need be. But we're not going away.

    Remove the Trucks... or else...Tear Down That Bridge Mr. Koessler.

  27. comptart_lws

    1 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 19:12

    Bill: I wanted to compliment you on the image at the top of the post and wonder what was the event that had all those young people in that spot? Does it happen to be at (or even near) where Olmsted stood at the "bluff"? I know of some great old photos that show how lovely and accessible that part of our waterfront USED to be. hmmmmmmmm maybe Brian Higgins has seen them? Well, maybe when he was our Waterfront guy, before he became Highway-guy.

  28. PBK

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 26th 2007, 21:05

    It took the courage and tenacity of one man to speak the unspeakable. Not our Governor, Not our Senators, not our Congressman/woman, or Co. Executive, or co. legislators, or Health Commissioner, or School Super. or common council, and certainly not our Mayor. But Bill Zimmerman. Finally, Dr. Mukasa gets some credit for all the years of being squashed by the PBA. Thank you Bill, Dr. Mukasa and every blogger out there. And thank you BRO....for giving this city and its people a real voice.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Members Who Bookmarked

Text Links