Riverfront Property For Sale- Elevator Included

Riverfront Property For Sale-  Elevator Included

Story Options

A Buffalo River grain elevator is looking for a new owner. The Agway/Cooperative Grange League Federation (GLF) Elevator is on the market with a $3.5 million asking price. Located at 327 Ganson Street, the 3.32 acre property includes the elevator, two mill buildings and 316 feet of river access. The property is across the river from the planned Buffalo Riverfest Park on Ohio Street.

“It has been on the market a couple of days and there have already been a couple of inquiries,” says listing agent June Penrod Gareau of Hunt Real Estate.

“The Great Lakes Fishing Club owns it. They bought it about 20 years ago and have been using it for boat storage,” she says.

According to Gareau, the seller is willing to divide the parcel. A buyer can purchase the two mill buildings for $100,000; the mills with the elevator on 1.75 acres and 135’ of river frontage for $1.5 million; or, the total 3.32 acre site for $3.5 million.

ganson.PNG

“The owners are looking for offers,” says Gareau.

The largest elevator on the site, the GLF ‘A’ Elevator built in 1941, has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity.

DSC_0061.JPG

From the Buffalo History Works website:

This complex is a mix and match of irregular shapes and vernacular architecture which includes a combination of metal and concrete. The GLF was built for the Grange League Federation (GLF) and served as both an elevator and a feed mill. The function of the elevator being that it took in corn and other elements of the feed mix which in turn were milled into animal feed at the adjacent mill.

The GLF complex got its start in 1908 when the original elevator on the property, the Wheeler elevator, began operation as a typical transfer elevator. When Grange League Federation took over the property to erect their feed mill in late 1920's, they built a small storage facility on the northwest end of the original Wheeler elevator. In 1941 GLF built a large railroad-based elevator to handle the huge increase of grain traffic that had developed in the late 30's. This elevator has two very characteristic work houses that protrude at either end of the structure and was designed by A. E. Baxter. The Agway/GLF complex shut down in the mid-1970s.

In June, RiverWright LLC sold the Lake & Grain Elevator on the Buffalo River to Buffalo Lake Port LLC, a Minneapolis-based investment group for $2 million. Buffalo Lake Port will use the facility for grain storage.

Get Connected: June Penrod Gareau, Hunt Real Estate, 716.903.2917

Grain Elevator Re-use:

Buffalo- Ethanol Production

Portland- Mixed Use

Minneapolis- Housing

Sacramento- Senior Housing

Baltimore- Condominiums

Quebec City- Art

DSC_0059.JPG

Entry image by xzmattzx.

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. gaustad

    9 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 01:08

    3.5 million for what - a polluted dysfunctional grain elevator on a polluted river that has been deserted.

    This parcel should be given away, the grain elevator should be demolished, the land should be cleaned up and we should move on from our past toward building something more useful.

    For all you grain elevator fans, go preserve, turn it into lofts, live in it and get it over with. They fill no use except representing demise to passer bys from out of town.

  2. joey

    5 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 06:30

    PERFECT OPPORTUNITY for all the preservationists here in Buffalo to finally put their $$ where their mouths are!! BUT NO!! They'll wait for someone to come along to buy this relic, so they can TELL them how to spend their money!!....and life goes on in Buffalo....

  3. al-alo

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 07:03

    i for one, am very please the fishing club maintained it so well through the years, it should help make this an easy sell.

    what the hell? i know its concrete and wont entirely collapse for another hundred years, but really. if i owned a piece of property in this shape the city would be so far up my butt they could tell what i had for dinner last nite. not to mention, i personally would be embarrassed that i my name is associated with such a dangerous and desolate derelict.

    not that there is no opportunities here, im not entirely pessimistic - but why was this complex allowed to discintegrate to such a state?

  4. siloman02

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 07:31

    Of the elevator complexes in this area, the GLF may be the most suitable for rehab as mixed use. Refer to: http://www.silopoint.com/html/ Located in Baltimore's Inner Harbor. Can the Buffalo area support such a development? I leave that opinion to you.

  5. NewBuffalo

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 07:35

    a DAISEY CUTTER would do this eyesore justice!

  6. KenS

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 08:16

    Driving down Ganson Rd. from Michigan to Ohio is one of the most depressing views in all of Buffalo. I know that the inner and outer harbor take precedence over this, but it is unfortunate that this scrap pile of warehouses/factories/silos is right in between the two.

  7. CRobs

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 08:31

    Yeah, nothing quite like $3.5 Mil for a delapatated, rat/asbestos-infested disaster. I would be willing to bet that it would cost more to rehab this place than it would to demolish and build a new structure. Granted, this is just my observation, but it would seem to me that reabbing this place presents some MAJOR obstacles in terms of health-hazzards and potential overall structural issues which would make construction an absolute bear. I could be way off base, but it just seems like it's time to move forward and find new industry and stop dwelling on how sweet we were 60 years ago. Some preservation and history is fine, but at this point it is just as well served in a museum. Everyone raves about what's going on at the canal and when it's done, it should be pretty cool. However, you don't see miles of rubble that used to be occupied by the speak-easies and other port-of-entry businesses. Instead, we're (albeit, FINALLY) developing, while leaving monuments and museums to spread the word of the past.

  8. Joshua

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 08:34

    I do agree that this property should be used for an ethanol production plant. Why not use the buildings as they were originally designed for. Why re-create the wheel?

  9. skarnath

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 08:48

    Has anyone considered the possibility that the Great Lakes Fishing Club bought this property for almost nothing 20 years ago (that's why they could justify its current use as boat storage), and it's now worth a considerable amount of money? So they're listing it to see if they get an offer they can't refuse. That is the normal speculation process in development.

  10. bboozehound

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 08:58

    Joshua,

    Maybe we should not reuse it as an ethanol plant because ethanol is a product whose time never came! At least corn based ethanol which I'm assuming you are refering to since the structure would be used to store the corn.

    Other than a few extremists types that want to save every once of historical revelance this area can produce. These grain elevators, for most, represent a chapter in Buffalo history that most would like to turn the page on. Most of them are sitting on absolutely prime development land and the region as a whole would be much better served with them gone. Other then a few quirky reuse ideas they are irrelevant to our past and our future!

  11. flyguy

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 09:13

    A mixed-use or residential conversion in that area is very questionable in my mind considering nearby industrial operations including tire shredding, truck traffic, rail traffic, whatever that dump of materials is located next to the site as pictured in the aerial. Doesnt seem a very ped. friendly and noise friendly area to be living playing or shopping. Any company who would come in and buy this and actually bring it back should be sainted. This is one of the most beat elevators down there and it does amaze me that such a sizable structure was let go this bad without being forced to fix it up. You cant say it was tucked away and building inspectors just missed it because its huge and everyone knows about its condition. Just looking at it the roof is clearly caving in ontop of at leats one of the workhouses. Trees naturally growing on the roof as they are and the busted windows tells me something about the likely condition of the rest of the place.

  12. Colin

    7 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 09:22

    1. Buffalo hasn't benefited from our tendency to demolish everything that's old or a bit run down. It might be a good idea to learn from that history. There hasn't exactly been a wave of development on other shovel-ready sites, has there?

    2. There's no apparent evidence to support the claim that this is "prime development land." If there was a great desire to develop this area, would the land really be owned by a fishing club or the Valley Community Center?

    3. Considering the difficulty in developing other key areas -- downtown, cobblestone, canal side -- is it wise to try and spread out that development even further?

  13. Joshua

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 09:37

    If corn ethanol is not the future of the new gasoline, there has got to be other uses for this type of building.? We should just demo to demo; demo should have a plan for the future, as Colin has stated above. There have been many building that have been demolised with no plan - including the Larkin Admin Bldg.

  14. KenS

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 09:38

    Colin...No one is trying to develop this vast wasteland(at least not into anything residential/office space/retail). It's just an attempted money grab by the current owners. They are well within their right, but are dreaming if they think 3.5 mil is coming their way. Anyone with money who is looking to invest in a development project will look to the inner and outer harbors before ever looking at this industrial graveyard(and even then, they would take one quick look and move on).

  15. TownLine

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 09:53

    I'm not married to any particular grain elevator. But I have to say, I absolutely love the scale and density of all of the elevators that exist along the Buffalo river. Going down the river by boat is almost like discovering a mystical lost city in the Congo somewhere. It has a very eerie feeling to it. Its like a whole other downtown to the city. Most of the elevators will probably never be used, and there are likely better current uses for that land. But at the same time, I think it would be a huge loss to start loosing these monstrous structures one at a time.

    I would love to see a plan or a vision presented for lands along the Buffalo River, before we start tear everything out. Something that can maintain that appeal, but also put the land to a more productive use.

  16. flyguy

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 10:26

    One nice thing it seems is that at least one of these shuttered elevators is coming back online after a number of years in the Lake & Grain elevator. If it is true that midwest storage is at capacity then we may be well suited as a new market for storage considering we have an abundance sitting there ready to go back online with some investment dollars. Who knows, if these unnamed investors showing interest come in and revitalize this elevator too then we may have some momentum going to get these back online.

  17. GDF81

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 11:00

    Just tear this thing down! Its such a piece of crap! Why are these people even selling it, unless someone with 3.5 million will buy it then invest another 10 million to do something with it. NYS should clear these structures out of the city, its such an eye soar.

  18. nick

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 11:19

    GDF, who do you expect to pay for the demo of the grain elevators? If you're suggesting the state should do it, I would ask where that money is coming from? These buildings have not been brought down because the task and cost will be enormous. The elevators were constructed to withstand grain dust explosions and I believe have 1 - 2' thick concrete walls, the buildings are basically elevated bomb shelters. It will not be cheap to demolish them, and they're not going to fall down. Unless there is a plan for reusing the sites, why waste the tens of millions of dollars on demo?

  19. Geomike

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 11:25

    It is odd to see these for sale, bc we can't conceive of who would take such a risk, but I would argue that the sale price is a steal given the value of a new build, and the potential for the property. To build anything new, of this scale, with that volume of concrete would be at least 5 times the sale price. I don't want to guess what the rehab cost would be, but let's ballpark it at the same price as the Aud (probabaly times 2) to start. There's a lot of potential in these buildings if there's someone with a creative eye, and a graps of reality to execute on that creativity. Who knows, they may never sell it and it may just continue to rot away. I'll play optimist and hope it sells to someone with a decent vision for the location.

  20. rydog71

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 11:33

    My thought, leave the elevators intake and see if there is a possibility of converting them to apartments/lofts and not high end apartments but affordable ones for those with a mid-level income. We don't need more condos until we get more high paying jobs in WNY. Also with the area being so industrial I think it would probably be more attractive to young creatives than rich businessmen.

    As far as the mill side goes, tear it down and put a marina in its place. If we continue to develop our Harbor we will need to keep adding slips.

    I think it does have potential if the riverfront park happens.

  21. GDF81

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 12:25

    ok, nick. I am just thinking that an investment by the state or city would increase the desire for serious developers to want to move into that district, someone needs to make the first step to improvement and what better company than NYS or Buffalo. This is buffalo "RISING", I think their needs to be some radical improvements to the city in order to start moving forward! at whatever cost! We need to bring up something that will really make a difference with this parcel, not just "well.. its to hard to demolish and really exspensive to do it. so ??? LETS DO NOTHING??" either way this land is going to cost us due to the fact that it will hold up any improvement that can be made in that area if it sits there.. possibly costing good tax money from a possible mixed use zone. Its a frickin eye soar! who would build anything nice with that looming in the background.

  22. skarnath

    6 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 12:29

    There is a plausible argument to be made that Buffalo's greatest architectural legacy is not the Martin House, the Guaranty Building or the Richardson Towers, but our incredible collection of grain elevators. Even in their deteriorating state, they maintain an eerie beauty :)

  23. PaulBuffalo

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 12:55

    Skarnath, I strongly agree with your view. It's interesting that folks point out the grain elevators as the eyesores when, to me, the poorly-maintained land surrounding a number of elevators is the real eyesore. There is a junkyard display of industrial bric-a-brac that could've been cleaned up years ago. There is real tourism potential in some of these structures, but lack of access is the critical issue.

  24. buffaloweiner

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 13:29

    Has anyone contacted Riverwright, they own and have marketing many of those silos to the midwest whichhas a shortage of storage silos.

    I say put them back to good use....these things will be around another hundred years. Their just storage, their not toxic industrial waste...the worst that is there is bird and bat dung

  25. Downtownjunkie

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 13:47

    I think much could be done by the city if they passed new harsh codes for these grain elevators. The fact that the majority of these grain elevators are privately owned and maintained by these owners as horrible as they are is a testament as to how the city truly cares about its image and on a more debatable subject its history. This is especially true for the countless number of out of town visitors driving up the 190 to Niagara Falls who see these mammoth forgotten structures. Here is a short list of possible recommendations IMO the city could and should implement that might help make these elevators more attractive.

    1. Although they may not be the most beautiful of buildings there sheer magnitude warrants some form of illumination at night. Creative lighting features would do wonders for these elevators creating an awe factor not found anywhere else in the world. 2. The countless amounts of industrial junk found strewn about the surrounding land of these buildings is an embarrassment. The city should make private owners clean up the land around these enormous buildings or face hefty fines that can be levied after the city cleans it up for them. The same can be done for making them structurally sound or safe to get up close to them. If the owners don’t pay up, the city can take control of the property. Which leads me to my next recommendation...

    2. The city should be making every effort possible to acquire these dilapidated historic structures. It is in our city's best interest and in the public’s best interest to gain control of these buildings and showcase them. If every one of these elevator sites were turned into almost pocket parks in that they would be surrounded by greenspace or anything besides the mounds of trash currently sitting there it could make for a unique tourist attraction and help bring people down there to see just how enormous these amazing grain elevators are.

  26. RonR

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:02

    I think the most telling component of the post is the comparison of what Buffalo is using these elevators for and what other regions are using them for.

    It shows that Buffalo will simply NOT let go of its industrial past regardless of the countless signs that is is never going to come back and be a productive component to the point where it outweighs the damage of having this mindset.

    The region simply has too many industrial sites and they are scattered. A lot are in the City of Buffalo but there is also a huge amount in places like Lackawanna and Tonawanda. All of these areas compete for the little business that thinks of the region.

    Here is a plan that "could" work in my opinion.

    Have the City of Buffalo and the City of Lackawanna merge into one entity. It would not bump the population but it would allow for some productive reorganization. If this were done, the new city could go after State and Federal funds to clean up the MASSIVE Bethlehem site which is an AWESOME location and needs some clean up.

    While the site is being cleaned up, buy out and demo all of the empty sites that give the region a black eye and a well deserved "rust belt" name. After this is done, offer some SERIOUSLY large tax breaks to companies to relocate to this site and build new and maybe "green" complexes. Make the first offer to General Mills. Now I am not saying to force GM to move. They have been good to Buffalo and they stuck around. The same goes for the other businesses that are currently operating. What I am saying is give these companies such a sweet package that it is a no brainier for them to move. If it means no taxes for 50 years...so be it. Make it a win/win. Since these companies would be given such a sweet deal, they could also be sold on expanding their operations or at the least making them cleaner for the local environment. If you package it right a business WILL make the move.

    On top of locating industry, make the old Bethlehem site the new "Port of Buffalo" which would be built with the latest technology and tools. Making it even more attractive for new companies to locate to the area.

    Now back up to the Buffalo River section. CLEAN IT UP and make sense of the street grid. Make the everything along the river shovel ready. I know people hate that term but hear me out. Make the GM location a park. Just grass. No buildings..just a lawn. Land bank what is possible in the 1st ward and outer harbor and give it time.

    Give the new and concentrated industrial complex the leadership it needs. Allow Buffalo to heal the scars from the past and create a 25 year vision. Not just pretty pictures but a game plan on taxation and economics. Get this plan in front of the voters and allow them to stamp it. Most importantly, do not allow the politicians to change it once the voters have their say.

    Ah to dream... Sorry for the rant.

  27. Prodigal-Son

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:16

    RonR - I love the plan. When you find $15 billion, let me know, and we'll get started!

    I don't mean to get sarcastic, but we're in a damned-if-you-don't, damned -if-you-don't position here.

    If you have a big dream, that requires big bucks, politicians to plan for the future, and citizens to vote to give up their village, you derided as wishing for a silver bullet that will never happen.

    But if are willing to take incremental steps, do what is possible now, and try to recover slowly, we never have a sufficient shake-up to free ourselves of the old-think of the past, and actually move on. We've been doing this second option for decades now, and we all know what the result is.

  28. heathersmiles

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:18

    I'll throw $20.00 into the collection to tear it down and start over with something productive. If everyone in Buffalo gave a little we could have a great waterfront, anyone with me?

  29. Downtownjunkie

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:36

    What if the Greenway were to incorporate these structures into their plans.

  30. crisa

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:48

    Everyone IN Buffalo is already giving aplenty!

    It needs a different venue.

  31. chrishawley

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 14:56

    I look forward to buying my GLF Condo with stunning views and concrete floors and walls...

  32. onestarmartin

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 15:13

    For 3.5 million I want a view of the ocean off Cape Cod, not a muddy creek! What a friggen joke...

  33. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 15:14

    P-Son-

    Like I said it was a dream.

    Now I am not sure about the numbers but I would think it is safe to say that for Buffalo/WNY to come back, $15B is going to have to come in. Somehow...someway.

    I think it would be more likely for the State and Federal levels to provide funding if the region were to show that it is serious AND had a plan that would pay off in the end. Scattered development of an ethanol plant here and a windmill there is not a plan that shows vision. At least the vision needed to unlock the type of money needed.

    I also do not think the sales pitch to bring back Buffalo would be that hard, IF a plan like this were in place. Everyone knows the advantages the region has. Even down in DC, there is knowledge that WNY is IMO the best situated for a bounce back. The reason is so much is gone. Like it or not, Buffalo/WNY is closer to the bottom so to speak compared to regions like Detroit and Cleveland. I know people will fight me on that comment but in reality, it is a good thing. Because of this, Buffalo/WNY has the easiest path of resistance to climb back.

  34. blackrocklifer

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 15:44

    I gotta agree with skarnath, these elevators have a presence and beauty that most cannot see or appreciate. The "junk" surrouding them detracts from the simplicity and elegance of the purely utilitarian design. These structures do not presently stand in the way of any developement and should be left standing for future re-use. Buffalo has plenty of vacant space and it would be foolish and expensive to demolish these elevators.

  35. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 16:13

    Blackrocklifer-

    Are you serious? These buildings, as they stand today, DO 100% stand in the way of development.

    They do so for 2 reasons.

    The first is their future is in doubt. No real estate developer in their right mind is going to develop what people want built next to these sites as long as their is a possibility that they COULD be reused for industrial purposes. As long as ethanol plants are allowed along the Buffalo river the community of retail and housing along that same stretch of is not going to happen.

    The second is they are UGLY AS HELL currently. While you are correct that the junk around them and the current condition of them do not allow most to see what people like you see, it does not change the view.

    For these to NOT be a determent in my opinion the elevators would need to be rezoned for non industrial use, the sites would need to be cleaned up with unsalvageable buildings removed and each elevator would need to be cleaned up with a good sandblasting and several coats of paint.

    I think finding $15B for my idea is more likely than yours.

  36. Downtownjunkie

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 16:42

    I think rezoning them would be a great idea!

  37. georged

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 18:17

    Don't tear it down! It is probablly one of the tallest structures in Buffalo's sorry excuse for a skyline!!

  38. crisa

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 18:40

    I have very vague memories of adults talking about what must have been relatives who worked in that place. I can't remember much but that for the laborers (they were not simply employees but men who labored HARDER than most in any working-classification comprehend today); men who developed health- and spirit-breaking "issues" and actually labored to death--here in the NE where union representation was begun and was so badly needed.

    Expecting to make those into working eth plants won't happen--toooo costly--it ain't your granddaddy's working conditions no more.

    Expecting people to LIVE INSIDE that stuff--yes--there actually are people willing and $$ed to do that! The more bragable the better! But that isn't a luxurious velvet green carpet to gaze upon--elimination is too cost prohibitive for the forseeable future.

    That grainery will still be "as is" for the next 40 years at least.

  39. Sal

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 21:12

    Over the years I have personally put in complaints against South End Marina at 1515 FUHRMANN about it's tax assessment (which in my opinion is way too low for direct waterfront property) as well as the condition of the building (this is the one on the lake that had that Titanic-looking ship abandoned next to it). Neither complaint was ever addressed.

    These buildings, and the silence that goes along with them, is one of the reasons I'm no longer a NY resident.

  40. Change

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 21:26

    The tire operation left a number of years ago. The idea of creative lighting does sound interesting. Incorporating a mural project with the elevators may be a use. The issue is much bigger than just this one site. A plan needs to be put into place to utilize what we have given the limited funds we have. We need to introduce the gritty but different lifestyles that can be presented by the river, elevators, and history. Urban planners will tell you that areas such as this are the future and we need to think positive and include all ideas when considering what the future may hold for this area.

  41. siloman02

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th, 23:23

    To put a perspective on the viability of the grain elevators: - In October of 2007, the cost for one bushel of storage space was $4.75 - To rehab an existing facility is between 45 - 55 % of that cost - Viable or not will be determined by market forces

    Within the last three weeks, several small groups of europeans have visited some of the abandoned elevators. As is well documented, the utilitarian design of these structures had a tremendous impact on architects, Mies being one. As with Quaker furniture, the designs are revered because of elegant, utilitarian design that is everlasting. Can, should they all be preserved? No! That is not possible, but their impact, personal and aesthetic, should not be forgotten or ignored. If NYS, Erie County and the City of Buffalo were more progressive more viable options would exist.

  42. Sal

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th, 07:55

    The reason a $3.5 million asking price seems so outrageous is that these grain elevators really do not come up for sale. The owners are generally corporations with government mortgages, so when the deals go south after decades of ownership then the public money gets wiped out. South End Marina sold for $10,000 from my recollection back Jimmy Griffin was mayor.

    If the Assessment Department was on the ball like they are with single-family residential properties, we would see these buildings come up for sale more often. Taxes on a $3.5 million assessment are about $140,000/year.

    If the Inspections Department was on the ball like they are with select property-owners, we would see these buildings come up for sale more often also. Housing Court could help by actually using it's powers more often instead of just idle threats.

  43. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th, 09:39

    Great posts, people. "1,000,000 bushels" x "$4.75" = OUCH! Buffalo and NYS can't do that now, but time is on the grain elevators' side.

  44. Hospitable

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 13th, 21:57

    Its no landmark like the HO Oats elevator Its doing much more damage to the environment than its worth Use some of that good old NYPA MONey and take it down.. clean it up and plant some trees. Grain prices are high but not high enough to use all of our old elevators..this sorry excuse won't be missed

  45. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 14th, 09:50

    Good morning to everyone here in TAXUS, N. Americaus.

    Leave all that stuff standing;. Coat the cement parts with a sealer every second year and establish a monthly clean up brigade, but otherwise leave them alone.

    Create a Coatings & Inspections Department of full-time positions for all historically preservable structures within Buffalo, which will create job guarantees well into the future.

    Then, please imagine this: One hundred years from now, (or 500 years from now), only the cement and steel parts will still be standing, crumbling but still imaginable as they were. In their responsibly preserved state, they will be a true relic of America's otherwise forgotten industrial past in an area of land once known as Buffalo in what once was New York State.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Members Who Bookmarked

Text Links