Olmsted Conservancy Board

Olmsted Conservancy Board

Story Options

Recently the Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy held their annual meeting to elect officers and trustees to serve on the Olmsted Conservancy Board.

The meeting took place at the Marcy Casino in Delaware Park. Conservancy chair J. Jerry Castiglia was succeeded by the newly elected chairman David Colligan. Anne Harding Joyce was elected to serve as chair-elect. Gary L. Mucci was elected to serve as secretary. James E. Iglewski was re-elected as treasurer of the board. Additionally, a few new trustees were elected to serve three-year terms including: Jeffrey L. Barbeau, Susan J. Elkin and Heidi Welsby.

collioganCOLOR23.jpg Conservancy Chairman David Colligan

The meeting also marked the unveiling of plans for Olmsted parks in the 21st century by Olmsted President and CEO, Thomas Herrera-Mishler. Plans for the parks involve a comprehensive operational plan to rebuild the parks as valuable neighborhood, regional, national and international resources. In total the recommendations in the plan will cost $428 million in 2008 constant dollars. This total includes money that will be used for plan recommendations within and outside of the cultural landscape. The restoration of everything inside the cultural landscape, which includes the six major Olmsted parks will cost $252.2 million.

The six major Olmsted parks will receive the following of the total cost:
Delaware Park and vicinity: $80,386,000
Front Park and vicinity: $21,120,000
Martin Luther King, Jr. Park: $39,415,000
South Park and vicinity: $18, 499,000
Cazenovia Park and vicinity: $56, 154,000
Riverside Park and vicinity: $10,522,000

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. chris_h_23

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 08:16

    The Cazenovia Park Casino really needs help. The columns are deteriorating along with a lot of the brick facade. Hopefully this will help out! It would be nice if they could figure out a use for the casino other than a place for kids to hang out because it really holds a lot of history.

  2. parkstreetwoman

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 08:28

    $428 million is an awful lot of money for the people of Buffalo to come up with! Good luck!

  3. Einstein

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 09:37

    What is the story with the Olmsted conservancy? I thought that they were overseeing the management of the park, while the City of Buffalo was ultimately responsible for the operations, maintenance, and development.

    Does the conservancy actually maintain and operate the parks? What is the City's role in the parks? I have tried to find more information on line, but there is little out on the conservancy. Was this board always in place, or was it recently created.

    I apologize for my ignorance on this subject, I haven't paid much attention to who is responsible for the parks.

  4. ElmwoodBoy

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 09:37

    TThe Conservancy just got $1.2 M from the Niagara River Commission for the Scajaquada Path to rebuild it, remove invasive vegetation and re-plant native species. I hope it is included in the "(p)lans for the parks involve a comprehensive operational plan to rebuild the parks as valuable neighborhood, regional, national and international resources."

  5. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 09:52

    It sounds like a lot fo money but not something that we as a community couldn't do if we wanted.

    If all of Erie County decided this was something it wanted to do, in FULL. it would require what.. about $950 dollars for everyone in the workforce. 453k people. Spread that over 10 years since it all can't happen at once anyhow that would be 95 dollars / year. Not that big of a lift... If we wanted to do it we could and I feel most people in Erie County and even in the city could afford 95 dollars a year for 10 years to fully restore ALL of the Olmsted parks and reconnect them all together into a system again.

  6. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 09:57

    Einstein.. it is a strange three way between Erie County, Olmsted and the City.. each of them are responsible for different things. Olmsted and the County Maintain the parks. The city is supposed to pay for capital improvements to the parks that the County Maintains and I think Olmsted + City work on capital projects for the Olmsted parks but more weight falls on Olmsted's shoulders than the city.

    I don't know the exact details but from what I have heard (maybe true or not) it is something like that... give or take an organization.

  7. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 12:15

    SBOF-

    While your numbers do seem simple, look at the location of the parks compared to the population of Erie County. These are all in the city.......

    These projects SHOULD be done but when you start asking the county workforce to throw down, you need to add a couple dozen parks to the list as well if you want to be fair.

  8. onestarmartin

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 12:22

    Pretty Lofty dreams here....where on earth do they think the money is coming from?

  9. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 15:45

    Well it is a scratch our back we will scratch yours. 10 years the region now has a real world class park and parkway system.. something to draw tourist.. while yes they are all located in the outdated and obsolete city boundaries they are the regional assets especially when you look at what is IN the parks.The Zoo, Botanical Gardens, History Museum. Albright Knox, Kleinhans Music Hall + others are ALL IN the Olmsted parks.

    I think the fact that these invisible and really useless boundaries are still influencing what gets done in the region is most of the problem. The fiefdoms they create.. why should I support anything outside out my little square.. it somehow doesn't affect me. Well not really true or important in a globalized world / economy.

    But if we have to deal with these boundaries then we can continue to raise money for something larger, more regional. how about the Niagara River greenway project. That would affect everyone along the Niagara River to Lake Ontario. How about more bike paths and transit into the suburbs. Fine. Just saying that if we actually ALL got together and pooled our resources we could easily raise the kinds of money to pretty much do everything we wanted..

    But instead we would rather keep our fiefdoms and in fighting about what I get. All anyone gets in this world are well pay politicians and supervisors instead of actually doing something constructive with it.

  10. skarnath

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 15:52

    Basic terms of the July 1, 2004 contract between County of Erie & City of Buffalo: 1) term is 15 years, expiring June 30, 2019; 2) City Parks employees transferred to County payroll; 3) City pays the County $1.8 million per year for first 4 years, then a formula is used to determine future payments, beginning 7/1/08; 4) under Section 13.5, both the City & County "consent & agree that the Buffalo Olmsted Parks Conservancy, Inc. shall operate, manage & maintain the City's Olmsted Parks and Parkways...as set forth in Schedule 3 (attached)"; 5) "all parklands not provided for in Schedule 3 shall be operated, managed and maintained by the County"; 6) capital improvements have to be mutually agreeable to the City & County, with the City maintaining primary funding responsibility for City parks; 7) capital improvements for the Olmsted Parks must be consistent with the Conservancy's 20 Year Master Plan; 8) City & County to establish a Capital Improvement Committee consisting of County Commissioner of Parks, City Commissioner of Public Works, and the Olmsted Parks Conservancy; 9) City can terminate contract with or without cause, on one year's written notice to the County, but the County can only terminate for cause, again with one year written notice.

    Although I'm not sure all of the schedules that are referenced in the agreement (for example, a complete equipment inventory) have ever been added, the agreement is fully executed and stands as a landmark tri-party agreement.

  11. buffaloweiner

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 17:57

    It all makes sense except fo South Park. Is anyone else shocked that $500,000 is all South Park needs....will $500,000 dredge the lake and get rid of that golf course?

    As far as the money, its not to manage and maintain the parks, but to restore the parks to their original oldmsted design.

    Wonderful...now when exactly will the projects start. I was hoping since they announced this in the spring that they would have started the restoration efforts this year while fanfare and accolades were done in situ.

  12. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 18:40

    SBROF

    I am not sure I see the same picture.

    Delaware Park has a lot of potential to draw people from out of town because of the museums. South Park has a lot of potential to draw people from out of town because of the gardens.

    I do not see much for MLK because of the location, even though it has a museum draw. I do not see much for Caz because it does not have a draw outside of the park itself. Front and Riverside are really just community parks and not worthy of tourism IMO.

    I agree that Delaware and South should BOTH remove the golf courses. They are not good courses and take away land from the park visitor.

    Now you mentioned the Zoo but lets be real, it is in a LOT of trouble. If Buffalo wants to have a Zoo that is productive and respectful to the animals that live there, it MUST get bigger. The zoo should double in size and take over about 5 holes from the course. Go into the park west at Jewett and south at Colvin. Where they meet should all be part of the zoo.

    I also understand your regional mindset. I just find it funny on BRO. The ONLY time the burbs are considered anything outside of suburban scum is when the check is left on the table. How many rants about the EVILS of Amherst and beyond have been found on this site? Now that there is a very nice and productive plan on the table at a cost of almost 1/2 BILLION does the song "we are family" get placed in the que.

  13. buffaloweiner

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 15th, 19:35

    The answer to the zoo is simple and Im suprised that no one will even consider it.

    They should look for a new home for the Buffalo Zoo and simply turn the current zoo into a petting zoo which would complement the park perfectly. Petting zoos are quite profitable and would be especially so for Delaware Park. If they did that then the neighborhood would drop their objections to the full zoo relocating to a new location.

    I agree that the golf courses must go....they belong in the suburbs where there is land anyway....and with the decay in the 1st and 2nd ring suburbs....something tells me that there will soon be more than enough room for them.

    There is only one thing that will bring Humboldt Park (MLK) and I understand its in their plans. They are going to rebuild the Calvert Veaux Parade House to rent out as a community market which the eastside desperately needs and which I think would be incredibly successful if they got rid of the roads and started treating it like a real park...perhaps even connecting it in a creative way to Masten Park and City Fields which are just a few blocks away.

    Now looking at our beautiful homes surrounding Delaware Park, I would say to a real estate developer that apartment buildings/condos/townhomes are an excellent investment surrounding/bordering olmsted parks. Yes, I think that a near billion dollar investment in olmsted parks would make real estate developments with $250,000 condo's quite well....even surrounding Humboldt, South Park, Cazenovia and Front.

    But then I have been saying for a while that I think that the area surrounding Masten Park, City Fields, Masten Armory, City Honors, Art Space, Packard, Our Lady de Notre Dame.....has enough density for major residential real estate redevelopment.

    As I have suggested to olmsted at their last meeting....remove everything not in the original plan for Humboldt to Masten Park and then integrate them creatively. This whole corridor between Main Street and Fillmore is ripe with enough anchors to redevelop itself with similar momentum to the Larkin District (just down Fillmore/Smith)

  14. TheNextMayor

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 18th, 19:30

    Having a master plan in place is essential for fundraising. It gives donors assurance their money is being used to accomplish a specific vision and not just scattershot.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links