New Homes vs. Old Homes

New Homes vs. Old Homes

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

Builder's have been feeling the pain of a less than par economy in the Buffalo area for some time.

However, the extent of their problems has not been crystal clear until a recent article in the National Bureau of Economic Research Paper. In comparing housing construction costs to the average sale prices of homes, it was surprising to learn that in Detroit, Fort Wayne, and Pittsburgh you can buy an existing house for 30 to 40% less than it costs to build it. Even more surprising is that Buffalo is fifth on the list with existing homes costing 30% less.

Picture%203_thumb.jpg

With the housing supply too large in Buffalo and people moving out of New York State, it seems unlikely the housing prices will snap back in the builder's favor. Will Buffalo's urban revival be enough to balance this deficit in the future?

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. NewBuffalo

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 09:11

    The problem is we don't have enough GOOD HOUSING. There is an over stock of existing homes on the market in general but good housing is scarce. When a nice updated home goes on the market it sells quickly usually with multiple offers. In addition there are 20 homes to this 1 thatgo on the market with no offers or a very long time to sell. This fuels suburban sprawl for new construction.

  2. rubygreta

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 09:18

    What a ridiculous study. Houses in Buffalo are much older than the average house in many metropolitan areas. So the existing houses typically need a ton of work to bring them up to condition of a new house. The new house may have a high-end kitchen with granite countertops. The old house may have an ugly 30-year-old kitchen that needs to be replaced (not to mention the need for near-term roof and boiler replacement, electrical upgrades, a new driveway and a whole host of other improvements). Was this factor taken into consideration?

    Let's say a builder owned a double lot in Elmwood Village. Five years ago he built a house on one of the lots. Today he just finished an identcal house on the other lot and sold it for $300,000. Is the 5-year-old house only worth $210,000? Don't think so. But the 100-year-old house next door might be only worth $210,000 because it needs a ton of work!

    Dumb, dumb, dumb.

  3. sally

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 09:34

    please correct your incorrect statement that people are moving out of NY State. In 1990 NY had approximately 18 million people, by 2000 that had risen to 19 million and the estimate for 2007 was approximately 19.4 million.

    The idea that the population of NY State as a whole has a declining population is not supported by ANY empiracle evidence, it is an urban myth.

    Erie County did lose approximately 18,000 people from 1990 to 2000 which is the last REAL count that was done. Census estimates become very shakey when taken down to the local County level as was evidenced by the 2000 census which showed a total EC population some 40,000 higher than the estimate given that same year.

  4. jamesbflo

    3 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 09:42

    that view is amazing.

  5. nb3004

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 10:12

    It looks like it is from the top of those ugly apartments on Elmwood next to Utica.

  6. thinker

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 10:39

    How can this data surprise anyone? Those us us that are homeowners of older homes have known this forever. Take at look at the replacement costs on your insurance rider. There will be a major discrepancy between what you paid and what the replacement costs are. And with older homes, replacement costs are higher because most can't be built to old specs.

    To me, this story sheds zero light on the obvious. The average home sale price in WNY is what, about $105,000. The cheapest new home sells for about $160,000 to $180,000 with zero character and zero "extras" (hardwood floors for example) that would be in an older home. So, the reality in WNY has always been and will always be that new homes sell for more than older homes and the replacement costs for older homes exceeds the sale price and, even more so, the assessed value.

  7. Activist

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 10:49

    Two points: - I agree that the census stats can often be mangled and misquoted, sometimes unintentionally and sometimes intentionally, to make a story "sexier" or the gossip juicier. I do know that things are bad in Buffalo, but are not beyond salvaging. In general, we've taken some major hits by way of population losses, but there are scores of grassroots success stories where neighborhoods are coming back through the efforts of residents, not government. I find that interesting. However, governments have never really understood anything on the grassroots level. Not sure why, but "it is what it is." - I think that the greatest housing strength that Buffalo has is its older houses. Sure, they do require a lot of work and investment to update them. However, when they're done, they're jewels. I live in a 90+ year old house for more than a decade now, having left a colonial in the suburbs, and absolutely love it. I know that there's a huge market for older city homes, but people balk, because of what they see as a ravaged school system and poor city services (like police services). Those are both areas that require strong government intervention, which is why a developer like Carl Paladino is taking the school district to court. People are willing to take a chance by moving into the city and move/invest into/in those older homes, but they're not going to do it in any large numbers until they know that government is a real partner and is actually making progress. (Perhaps this is why the Buffalo Police Department is limiting information to reporters and the general public on crime. Makes sense from their perspective.)

  8. gaustad

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 11:16

    Forbes magazine lists Buffalo among top 10 'Fastest-Dying Cities'

    Updated: 08/06/08 1:48 PM

    Buzz up!

    Add to My Yahoo!

    * POPULAR * SAVE * EMAIL

    * PRINT * + Larger Font * - Smaller Font

    Related Content Related Content

    * DYING, OR JUST DORMANT? Comment at Inside the News, 'We're not dead yet'

    Buffalo has the less-than-flattering distinction of being named to Forbes magazine's list of America's Top 10 "Fastest-Dying Cities."

    Forbes created its list of metropolitan areas facing rapid declines through analysis of census, unemployment and annualized gross domestic product (GDP) data. Buffalo's unflattering statistics included a population loss of nearly 42,000 since 2000, an unemployment rate of 5.7 percent (compared to national average of 4.3 percent) and a GDP of 1.9 percent.

    "Buffalo has long been synonymous with city-in-decline. In the early 1900s, Buffalo was one of America's 10 largest cities, a burgeoning industrial center. It's been on decline ever since, despite a location that takes advantage of trade with Canada," the magazine explained.

    It did note, however, Buffalo's bright economic assets include M&T Bank and Delaware North Companies. Mayor Byron W. Brown today insisted the Forbes list does not measure what's happening in the city today, claiming Buffalo is enjoying "record investment."

    "There is no way Buffalo is a dying city," the mayor said.

    He added that he plans to write to Forbes to provide data about the dozens of economic development projects that are under way, not to mention Buffalo's numerous credit-rating upgrades by Wall Street rating firms.

    The Forbes list, Brown said, focuses on population decline. The exodus of people from Buffalo over the past 50 years can't be denied, but Brown said the trend is "slowing a bit."

    "We see that as a very good sign," he said.

    Other cities making the fast-dying list include: Cleveland, Dayton, Canton and Youngstown, Ohio; Flint and Detroit, Mich., Springfield, Mass.; Charleston, W.Va.; and Scranton, Pa.

  9. EricOak

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 11:47

    How America loves a list. So much easier to stop thinking about an issue when you have a list.

    I believe an economist at Forbes also mentioned that Buffalo's economy was the strongest/most promising of the cities with declining populations. The article in the News also points out that Erie County's population in certain age groups has increased, and that the overall rate of population loss has slowed.

    Metaphors like "dying city" are useful in the cliche and headline-hungry world of American journalism. But the image of "dying" cities" is misleading. Almost every single Northern city (big and medium especially) is losing population; some at more acclerated rates than others. What the metaphor of the "dying" city doesn't convey are the many changes and adaptations all cities have to go through as they evolve. Some contract, some regionalize (amen!)and some just convalesce for a long time.

    But Buffalo is not dying; it's evolving--there will still be hundreds of thousands of people in this metropolitan region a hundred years from now. The key will be in nurturing (or maybe seducing) new industries and business services (medical research and manufacturing for one); when these are grafted onto our mature cultural institutions, notable architecture and exceptional geography, we can stop planning our funeral .

  10. jamesbflo

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 11:52

    about that news story of the BPD limiting information. Does anyone else find it rediculous that the news ran that story front page above the fold. If my house was burglarized i'd feel violated enough and wouldnt appreciate the media exploiting my misfortune. Actually, they should just get rid of crime reporting all together... what a downer to read (or watch) that crap. Besides, how does it actually help? Seems to me that it only creates hysteria and gives a bad image.

  11. PaulBuffalo

    3 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 12:20

    ErickOak has it right that the city is evolving. Yes, it's getting smaller; but, at some point, Buffalo will increase in population. Based just on it's geographic location, it can't disappear because it's a conveniently-located international gateway. The waterfront is improving, people are moving into downtown, more small businesses are discovering the city, the medical campus is growing; well, that's just a start. Yes, all of these changes are occurring slowly, but there is momentum. The challenge of the east side is a problem, but it's also an opportunity that demands creative thinking. The city could initiate an international competition that invites architects and urban planners to create solutions for that area.

    I think the Forbes article has made too much of an impression on some BRO readers because some of the comments on various posts border on depression and defeat. Don't despair.

  12. BuffaloBloviator

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 12:53

    According to Forbes we lost population yet we actually produced more. Our GDP increased an annualized 1.9%.

    Forbes should recognize that means that Buffalo is the model of a successful right sizing. We should get a prize.

    Personally, I don't measure the success of a city by population growth (Can a million flies be wrong?); I measure success by productivity growth. Produce more and live better. Buffalo made a bigger and bigger pie and we have fewer mouths to have to share it with. Life is good.

    Buffalo has had nearly full employment for many of the years in the report. We (Buffalo metro area) also enjoy being ranked #1 most diversified economy by Moody's. That is why we have one of the hottest top 10 real estate markets in the country right now.

    Unless you are a tax collector, why on Earth would you want a population explosion? What an outmoded metric! And I don't buy the argument that we are loosing our kids. Statistics have shown that we no longer loose any more of our kids than average cities.

  13. wizardofza

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 15:44

    I have to agree with Eric and Bloviator. Succeess shouldn't always be measured by raw population figures. If that were true, cities like Sao Paolo and Bombay would be regarded as the best places to live and do business.

    While the city (wihtin our obsolete boundaries which hardly reflect modern mwtropolitan economics) continues to lose overall population, there have been notable gains in recent years. Desirable neighborhoods have seen a great boost in investment, beautification, civic pride, and even population. Downtown has seen a great number of renovations and new residents.

    Yes, the blighted and undesirable neighborhoods have continued to decline and hollow out but this is just a reflection of greater trends affecting almost all of the old rust belt cities. Buffalo is nothing out of the orfdinary in that regard. If Buffalo can srhink and condense into a nicer, more efficient city that offers a better quality of life then great! Size doesn't always matter.

  14. NewBuffalo

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 17:15

    Buffalo?> or Buffalo metro? Lets get it right, wheatfield NY Growth for 2007 18%, Lancaster.....etc.....The city limits are VERY DECEIVING!

  15. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 18:41

    Pitty poor Thinker and Activist. Pitty poor anyone, city (or burbs, precious few in the burbs), whose homes are so much older that they were actually built BEFORE homes were built according to "specs".

    Imagine, just TRY to imagine a home built WITHOUT required Specifications. Nasty! Oh no, not nasty.....

    Oh no. Wait a sec. Those older homes, when taken care of through the years, are NOW beyond the price range of even a mere millionaire to build FROM SCRATCH at today's going rate.

    Why? Because, the older a house is, the more likely it was built...

    100+ years ago--houses were built better than anything being built for the less than multimillionaire set today. Those earliest homes were built by true craftsmen proud of their skills and minus any established specifications.

    More than 50 years ago--when Specifications were first established and rigidly adhered to.

    40 years ago--when house were built to specifications going lax.

    30 years ago--when the specifications were as abbreviated as the term "specs". And so on down below lax.

    And try, just try, to find the ACTUAL, honest-to-goodness replacement value of such vaulable, no longer replacable homes!

  16. Jolopy

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 19:32

    According to my insurance the replacement cost of my home is $350,000. Which kind of makes me want to light a match but then I look around and see all the wood trim, floors, tiger maple fireplace and all the other old world charm. Take for example this. My house is 24 feet wide by 64 feet long, each floor from floor to ceiling is 12 feet, with a full attic and basement. Try building a new build with the wood detail in my house and each floor being 1494 sq for under $350,000. Simply can't be done. This is why I am proud to live in Buffalo because i take pride in the beauty that other people here do as well.

  17. buffaloweiner

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 7th, 23:46

    As much as people complain about Buffalo....and housing...and jobs..and government (and the list goes on)

    It reminds me of tourists to the caribean or africa or elsewhere poverty is endemic...and come back with the comment that they still manage to bathe, eat and have clean clothes...many white sunday linens....even though they live in shacks.

    I say this because poverty is no excuse for not shoveling a sidewalk or sweeping a curb or cleaning a gutter or planting a tree or mowing a tiny lawn (much less planting a flower), or washed a window or even buying a $20 can of paint and painting your friggin pealing house.

    I say this because when was the last time citizens demanded streets be repaved with new curbs and sidewalks, street lighting replaced, sewars and water mains upgraded

    I say this because when was the last time people complained about say Buffalo State not expanding, or the NFTA not extending the light rail or the Buffalo Harbor not attracting new ships, or our city not investing in a new convention/conference center, or the delays in the Richardson, or our city not marketing our grain silos even when Katrina shut down the Mississippi River Port of New Orleans to grain exports, etc.

    We Buffalonians are somewhat of a stupid lot....we are wonderful people...but stupid dumb-asses. Everywhere....and every opportunity we have the ability to invest in our city and in every case....we DO NOT...worse...every institution complains of not having enough money...but the truth is....they have the money but choose to spend it on buracracy and over-staffing people rather than on investing it so the private sector economy can grow.

  18. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 09:16

    Jolopy. Its been many years since any homeowners' insurance agent would... Well, its been many years since... Heck, they won't tell ya no more! Ins. reps used to try but they won't anymore.

    First, no one knows what it would cost to ACTUALLY replace the fantastic house you describe. The reason given today, if pressed for a reason, is that no "specs" means no record which leads to no know (or no wanna know). Or, atleast that's the excuse.

    Its been much more than 100 years of removal of the forests houses like yours were built from. Besides the serious scarcity of really good wood, this is the time of the chemically quick "wood" aging process. (The wood in your house doesn't have chemicals in it.)

    Second, your insurance quote is not reality. Although you might not be able to afford the premiums for your home's ACTUAL replacement value, its also out there in the industry that NO ins. company would be willing to take on THEIR OWN EXPENSE of actually attempting to replace your home, (and that would be a bare-bones attempt at best anyway. ) Three hundred and fifty thousand $$s would buy you a somewhat decent house in a suburb, is all.

  19. Jolopy

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 09:43

    I probably should have been a little bit clearer Crisa. The $350,000 was what they said the value would be for my home if it caught fire and was destroyed. I mistook this from replacement cost. My insurance agent was pretty up front with these numbers. For the actual cost to repair, you may be right that there is no exact number. This is why I choose a high deductible. In the ballpark of $1500. I figured the way this house was built I will only have to worry about something major IE a storm blowing a tree into my house or god forbid a floor collapsing. I figured the rest I can learn or do myself with friends. I think the one this that makes me enjoy Buffalo beside the people and its growing change are its old homes. The simply design of these homes create a feeling of togetherness that you won't get in the burbs. The simple fact that I live above someone and share my home with them makes me feel closer to them and my neighborhood. I'm not sure if this made any sense but I hope everyone understands what I am trying to say. The short- old homes and 2 family homes create a sense of community. haha After all that have a good morning everything.:-)

  20. cmj

    2 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 09:49

    After reading all the comments there is one common thread, everyone loves this city we call Buffalo. It has some negatives but many positives like its homes, but like anything else our possesions have to be taken care of. Some of the homes in Buffalo for one reason or the other, like absent land lords, have not kept up with the repairs of the real estate they own. These homes, whatever percentage they maybe, brng down the total picture. In every neighborhood in the city. There can be found beautiful homes of all price ranges. These homes have yards that are taken care of, painted exteriors, good windows and a roof. I cannot tell you of the interiors because I can only judge the cover of the home but if a good exterior tells the average citizen of the interior, those homes are well taken care of.

    I think that more pride in the neighborhoods that are lived in has to happen to help the overall picture that Buffalo gives out. When a home is purchased, it is taken for granted that like anything else that is owned it has to be taken care of and the older the home the more care has to be given to it. Only those who want to give the care need to buy and live in the older Buffalo homes. It is nice to see that in many of the city neighborhood that this is happening but I wish more people would do this.

  21. Spaulding97

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 10:15

    How come there aren't any gated communities in the city besides the Waterfront village?

  22. Spaulding97

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 10:21

    How come there aren't any gated communities in the city besides the Waterfront village?

  23. kooksapalooza

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 10:35

    exactly what community would you like to have gated!?

  24. sally

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 10:38

    Waterfront Village is NOT a gated community

  25. Spaulding97

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 11:12

    Gez people calm down. Its just a question, no need to get your panties in a bundle.

    Kooks- I meant why arent there any new gated communites built? There are nice gated communites in a bunch of cities, just curious why not here.

    Sally- Waterfront village sure does seem like a gated community then.

  26. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Aug 8th, 11:24

    Jolopy: I understand.

    This comment box reads: What Do You Think? So I am thinking. ~~~ About absent houseownership, which is rampant in this City and fast-growing in the suburbs. Many streets are already overrun with Investors who rent to Transient Tenants. Although its sickening to have fine houses demolished, its better than having an "I" rent to "TTs" until the undercaredfor house goes down. ~~~ The star ratings at this and other such Web logs are intriguing. Besides wondering if people 5-star themselves or have friends do it for them, this is my best thought:

    "The stars at night Are big and bright tap.tap.tap.tap Deep in the heart of Texas" But this isn't Texas. This is TAX US. ~~~ Last night we heard a loud crash of thunder that seemed VERY close to us. Sure enough. Today an ins. adjuster was at at a house near our's adjusting the damage! ~~~ The Jim's Steakout ad here is gonna make me hungry. I don't want to be hungry until eat-out dinnertime, so, bye bye for now.

  27. TranspoGuy

    1 ratings12345
    Aug 19th, 17:06

    Spaulding, why would you want to advocate for gated communities? They just segregate and create a feeling of snobbery in cities. I like being able to walk down any block I want.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links