Mining Our Heritage: the Next Preservation Threat?

Mining Our Heritage: the Next Preservation Threat?

Story Options

Hidden in the recent coverage of the sale of the former American Axle plant was news that sent a shudder up my spine with its implications: half the complex will be demolished—in large part, for the value of the recovered materials. According to the coverage in the Buffalo News:

Jim Militello, of JR Militello Real Estate, a Buffalo firm specializing in sale and lease of commercial and industrial properties, said the buyer’s plans for partial demolition fit an emerging pattern where the rising price of scrap steel is a purchase motivator.

“The price of steel is at a point where a lot of buildings are worth more as scrap than they are as standing structures,” Militello said. “Nobody understands better than [Jon] Williams [of Ontario Specialty], who is in the demolition business. It’s going to work to his advantage on this project.”

Ontario Specialty, headquartered at 333 Ganson St., has taken on several high-profile demolition and industrial remediation projects in recent years… As raw material prices have skyrocketed in recent years, in a trajectory tied to the skyrocketing industrialization of China and India, there has been a phenomenon in the underground economy, with abandoned buildings being stripped of materials such as copper piping. But—as this quote suggests—is this trend now crossing over into the official economy, with a legally sanctioned plunder of buildings for their raw materials?

In My Fair City, in the last couple of years Eastman Kodak has removed over a million square feet of former industrial space from what was once the largest industrial complex in the northeast. The stated reason for this demolition blitz was to save on property taxes that would otherwise be owed on idled space. However, the company never inquired with our city government about the possibility of deferring taxes on those buildings to preserve them for future industrial use (or adaptive reuse), causing much speculation that the main motivation for their removal was the increasing scrap value of the steel and other materials recovered from the buildings.

ako2.png

Also, my City Hall’s motivation for its current plan to demolish a major portion of our old downtown subway tunnel—but only the section built of structural steel, and not the section built of reinforced concrete—is almost openly acknowledged to be the rising value of the steel to be recovered.

In terms of the value proposition, this is not unlike another phenomenon which robbed Buffalo and all of America’s cities of many fine buildings during the 20th Century. In the automotive era, the land that many buildings stood on became more valuable for surface parking than the value of the buildings. So down they came, snaggletoothing streetscapes across Buffalo, and clearcutting much of the west side of the central business district in My Fair City. One of Buffalo’s most notable victims was the Hotel Buffalo (http://www.buffaloah.com/h/statler/hotel/index.html) designed by notable Buffalo architects Esenwein & Johnson—a terra cotta Art Nouveau masterpiece. In 1968, it was demolished to expand surface parking.

ako3.png

It’s important to recognize that this new threat is something very different from the way Buffalo ReUse operates. The fine folks at ReUse recover materials and features from buildings which are already slated for demolition—they don’t actively seek to deconstruct buildings that otherwise wouldn’t be endangered.

Related to the mining of buildings for their raw materials is the shady-at-best practice—as nicely covered in Steel’s recent article “Deaccession”—of buying buildings to strip them of their art and architectural features. Especially hard hit by this practice have been Buffalo’s churches, as seen here and here, and the Buffalo Central Terminal. Even where legal, those who engage in this practice generally carry out the desecration out of sight, and generally don’t stay around to face those who have to deal with the aftermath—and when making their purchases, they generally don’t signal their intentions.

ako4png.png

But now, as Militello suggests, will investors begin openly bidding on buildings, not for their value as standing structures, and not for the value of the land they stand on, but—with the explicit intent to demolish—for their raw material value? Will we see our built environment mined for raw materials? Is it good policy to allow this? How will urban planners, the preservation community, and city governments respond?

In 19th Century Egypt, tombs were looted by Europeans who burned the mummies like logs to fuel their railway locomotives. Like those 19th Century Egyptians, will we allow our own rich heritage—built with the toil and sweat of generations past—to be taken to fuel the growing might of overseas industrial powers?

Photo credits: Democrat and Chronicle (Kodak), Buffalo/Erie County Historical Society (Hotel Buffalo), David Torke’s Fix Buffalo blog (interior, Our Lady of Lourdes)

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. totem71

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 11th 2008, 09:28

    >> Will we see our built environment mined for raw materials? Is it good policy to allow this? How will urban planners, the preservation community, and city governments respond?

    Economic trends being what they are, we're going to have to acknowledge that bottom-lines are shifting. Planned shrinkage might start making more sense to more people in the coming years; the opportunity to liquidate / recycle buildings and other physical infrastructure may merit increasingly serious consideration.

    On the political side, it's important to ensure we're electing (and pressuring) officials to keep policymaking proactive, ahead of the curve, and keep purely revenue-driven motivations from establishing facts on the ground.

    Perhaps urban planning in the coming years will be about consolidation, refactoring, recycling, optimization. In a word, adaptation. If any city is poised to blaze a trail in this direction, it's Buffalo. That is, if it's guided by vision that prioritizes common sense and quality of life, which I'll be the first to admit, is a huge "if".

    It's up to the preservation community to be pragmatic and pick its battles wisely. Buffalo has plenty of structures worth fighting to preserve, and plenty others we should be prepared to let go of. Focus on a vigorous defense of the ones that matter most.

  2. Buffalo21stcentury

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 11th 2008, 10:55

    This trend is dead in the water!

    Steel prices are crumbing and so are copper prices and every other commodity. Look around you, read the news or watch TV, this trend has ended or is in the process of ending.

    While the rest of the nation crumbles Buffalo and Rochester for that matter and Syracuse all are some of the best places in the country because our real estate was undervalued for so long that the rest of the country is deflating down to our level.

    If their planning on demolishing half American Axle for that reason then they may want to check commodity prices in the next month. Unless they have a contract which I doubt they would make more money trying to rent it out than demolish it.

  3. PaulBuffalo

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 11th 2008, 11:27

    I agree that commodity prices have ended their run, albeit temporarily. Once the world economy reinvents itself and demand for commodities increases, these old structures will again be vulnerable. In the meantime, Buffalo and all older cities have some time to save these buildings.

    RaChaCha, please don't show any more of these photos. They're too painful to view.

  4. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 11th 2008, 14:20

    That first building was great. whats its story?

  5. chrishawley

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 11th 2008, 18:47

    Many of Rome's great landmarks were demolished so the marble coudl be re-used in construction of city sewers.

  6. RaChaCha

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 12th 2008, 15:42

    Andrew, that is (or was) the Vernor Building - a totally unnecessary demo (http://www.buffalorising.com/story/breaking_vernor_building_demo). I stopped by during the demo and talked with the contractor: "Yesiree, I've taken buildings down all over the country. Nope, never bothered me a bit - I'm a suburban person, not an urban person..."

  7. RaChaCha

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 12th 2008, 15:54

    Chris Hawley, you know your history, sir - you and Senator Moynihan would have gotten along famously.

    To your point, the emperor Majorian, in fact - an early preservationist - made attempts to halt the practice of "mining" the monuments and public buildings of Rome, which was described as follows:

    "The monuments of consular or Imperial greatness were no longer revered as the immortal glory of the capital; they were only esteemed as an inexhaustible mine of materials, cheaper, and more convenient, than the distant quarry. Specious petitions were continually addressed to the easy magistrates of Rome which stated the want of stones or bricks for some necessary service: the fairest forms of architecture were rudely defaced for the sake of some paltry or pretended repairs; and the degenerate Romans, who converted the spoil to their own emolument, demolished, with sacrilegious hands, the labours of their ancestors."

    -- Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

  8. platt4

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 12th 2008, 16:20

    Degenerates- that about sums it up.

  9. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Oct 13th 2008, 21:02

    This is an excellently voiced topic!

    It also points out the value of Buffalo Reuse!

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links