Public Meeting: Mending The Scar

There's both good news and bad news that came out of the Scajaquada (Route 198) public hearing last night. The good news is that the DOT and its joint members appear to be on the right track for a good plan. The bad news is that the plan won't see a completion date until the year 2016. I asked an elderly resident the other day if he would be interested in learning more about this project and he answered, "I'd rather contribute to a project that I'll see completed in my lifetime." That is not a slam against the DOT... it is a just a response that many people have when they hear the timeframe for these types of projects.
Even if the plan was in place and work could get started tomorrow, the money has not been identified for this project. Which project you ask? There area a few. They range from the perfunctory 'Do nothing plan' to the 'Two-lane proposal'. There are a few plans in-between that have some legs do to cost measures. It is important to know that the planning process is currently in its infancy. Unlike the Route 5 issue, the DOT should be commended that there is an overabundance of community input on the project. It looks as if the DOT has gone out of its way to bring the public in for the Scajaquada issue. They appear to be taking the surrounding community's interest to heart as much as they can, considering that it would be an enormous cost to fully repair past damages that The Scar (Scajaquada Expressway) has inflicted. Following are the basic starting points being considered:
Alternative 1 keeps the roadway as is.
Alternative 2 would be a four-lane roadway with a 40-45 MPH speed limit and landscaped median with signalized intersections.
Alternative 3A would be a four-lane roadway with a 40-45 MPH speed limit that would incorporate a landscape median, and roundabouts for traffic calming measures.
Alternative 3B would be a four-lane roadway with a 30-35 MPH speed limit that would also have a median and roundabouts.
Alternative 4 would be a 2-lane roadway with a 30-35 MPL speed limit with landscaping and roundabouts.
The conceptual plan is to, ideally, tie Delaware Park back together again (as much as is possible). The $30-40 million project will hopefully take many of the best-practice scenarios from other cities into account. The DOT is looking for community input regarding the 3.3 mile stretch, which currently has a posted speed limit of 50MPH.
If you have any input at this time, you can submit your thoughts to www.NYSDOT.gov/scajaquadacorridor.

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view …
Caroline Kennedy was in town for a visit with our mayor yesterday. A possible choice to succeed US Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kennedy's name has been mentioned along with that of Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo) and our own Byron Brown, among others.
Certainly, Kennedy has "been around politics" all of her life, which is to say she was born into a family of politicos and lived in the White House--neither of which would necessarily f …
Free light rail rides on downtown's above ground section could be derailed thanks to the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority's budget mess. That is the news coming out of a Buffalo Place meeting this morning. Facing a budget shortfall and reduced State operating assistance, the NFTA is scrambling for new revenue sources and is contemplating charging for rides along the lengthy downtown pedestrian mall.
Well it is Christmas time in the city and the NFTA helped put people and especially children into the mood in a very festive and fun way. One of my favorite memories of childhood was taking the train downtown with my grandfather. I would gaze out the windows and watch the tunnel speed by. It always felt like we were going a million miles an hour.
Then there was the ability to stand up and walk around during the ride without the need to be strapped down. It was always a fun time … 




Comment Options
galaxyjay
2016! wtf! Ahhhhhhhhh!! Just like having to wait 18 months to raze the aud!! - even though it doesnt look like its going to be that long anymore. Why 9 years? What in god's name makes it take that long to raise the $$ ...AHHHHHH!
Report this
SLEEPL8
I'm 26 and I wonder if this will get done in my lifetime?
Report this
Joshua
I would have to see the specs - but ALT 4 seems like the best plan.
Report this
Keith
Alternative 5: Bury the road like they did in Boston. Woh, uhhh, sorry I was daydreaming there for a minute---I like alternative 4.
Report this
sbrof
GREAT!! 3B or 4! wow the changes that would bring to the park and the city are fantastic. Bring back the roundabout this with the Richardson project, this area will be quite impressive in 10 years!
Report this
icecreamsub
2016? what's the rush?....I was expecting at the minimum 2025...now I'm excited.......
Report this
NBJOHN
Alt 4
2016 really isn't that far away but is it realistic?... I know of course we all want things done now...
How's that bridge coming?
Report this
scooter
This is just like New York State, always behind. By 2016 we won't need roads, we'll be driving around like the Jetsons by then.
I vote for either 3B or 4.
Report this
zen
2016 (target date)=2116 (completion date)
Report this
flyguy
Well I hate to be a pessimist but it is Buffalo here and history within the past 40 years has made us this way but 2016 actually means 2025 or 2030 because right when we are at the verge of it starting to physically develop someone will surely throw a lawsuit hail mary at the last minute and hold it up even longer. By that time I will be nearing 50 or 60 years old. Yay
Report this
flyguy
Anything but alt 1 and alt 4. This roadway serves a purpose as a higher speed trafic mover and creating a 30-35mph roadway would take this artery and drop it down to something less than it should be. I like alt 2, 3a, and 3b
Report this
Talkin_Proud
ALT + F4
Close that f_cker down.
Report this
chris69
I think there needs to be a conversation about the Kensington and the Scajaquada.
Unfortunately Scajaquada Creek and Hoyt Lake prevent any possibility of a below ground roadway.
However, the intersection with the Niagara Expressway is an abomination that just kills everything between Niagara and Grant......no matter what is done the scajaquada will always divide Forest Lawn and Delaware Park as well as Delaware Park itself.....but we have a real possibility to address Niagara Street, Forest and that while area of Black Rock. Perhaps inviting an expansion by Contract Pharmacueticals at the old Bristol Myers Factory, a redevelopment at the old Atlas Steel site and an expansion by Buffalo State.
There is also the opportunity to integrate Buffalo State across the scajaquada expressway and scajaquada creek to integrate it with the land on the other side....this must be addressed as well. Buffalo State is a major local influence on the local economy and property values so we must encourage their growth and expansion until it reaches its true potential in partnership with UB.
Report this
BuffaloRox
9 year timeline is: Years 1-3 for preliminary study, Years 4-5 for final EIS, Years 6-7 for final design and Years 8-9 for bidding and construction. I think it will take several more years than what is being projected.
As far as funding, because federal funds will be sought and the current federal transportation budget has been allocated, no funding will be sought until the next federal transportation bill (whenever that is).
I went to the meeting and the NYSDOT engineers specifically said that the ramps on the eastern and western edges were outside the scope of the project. The engineer said that the ramps themselves have so many issues that it would easily derail and delay the project. He did say that if there were ideas or plans that developed about those ramps that they would try to account for them in the project. That seemed reasonable to me. Chuck Banas (sp?) of the New Millenium Group asked about decking over "the cut" where Main, Humboldt Pkwy and Scajaquda meet. NYSDOT was open to examining it but obviously pointed out that would raise the cost estimate.
According to the NYSDOT, alternative 4 was only included because the City of Buffalo insisted. Their initial concern about this plan is that it would result in traffic being diverted onto more residential streets (namely, Amherst, Forest, Delavan). With peaks of 80,000 cars/day being reported, I don't think pushing traffic onto those streets would be a good idea.
Overall, I thought the meeting went well (other than being disappointed at how long it was going to take).
Report this
Jefferson
Could someone please help me out with the photo. What is the area in the foreground? And I guess I'm looking east?
Report this
SLEEPL8
Jefferson...It looks like 2 images merged together. The "top" of the photo is looking east. If you locate the gallery about 1/3 of the way down the photo there is a line just "below" it that starts the second image which looks like it could be the intersection at Parkside looking North??? That is my best guess...I dunno though...
Report this
BAEagen
Two times this past summer surveyors were working on Dearborn Street. When questioned by a couple of residents the surveyors said..."its for possible 198 relocation". No mention of that in any of the plans.
Report this
al-alo
i believe thats medaille college @ parkside
Report this
BuffaloRox
These are two photos. Top photo is 198 looking east from Albright-Knox Art Gallery and the bottom photo is Agassiz Circle with Medaille at bottom, Parkside Ave at top.
Report this
STEEL
I think it is pretty clear that the 2 lane option is the one that should be built. We must keep in mind that there was no demand for this volume of traffic through this area until a super highway was sliced through this city park. The park was stolen from the people of Buffalo and we should never forget that!
When your car has been stolen you don't negotiate with the thief to get back half of it. We should get back all of Delaware park not just some of it.
Report this
11111inBlo
I also attended this meeting and their literature that was included showed a history and a future lime line: 1980's The community began discussion about problems on this road 1999 Buffalo with the Olmstead parks began a study 2005 Further Studies and public discussion 2007 NYSDOT begins indepth study 2007-2010 Premininary Studies & designs 2011 Final Environmental Impact Study 2011-2013 Detailed Design 2014-2016 Construction
So if we guess that "1980's" means 1986 AND that the proposed completion date does not slip at all this project will have taken 30 years from first rumblings to completion!!
This meeting left me with two questions: 1. Lots of people in the audience made comments about the community "healing" after the re-construction. how much longer after the re-construction will it take for these places to "heal"? If they haven't healed into new, different neighborhoods in the 60 years since this was built, will they ever be re-healed? Will it take 30 years from the completion data? That would be 100 years from the original construction!
2. What kind of healing do we expect to really see here? I would love to see Lincoln Parkway re-connected, but does it really matter? They also talked about splitting Delaware park from the Art gallery and the Cemetery, but really who goes to all three of these in one day anyway? I'm hoping that I just don't understand, but would someone please give me an example of how this will REALLY impact the area? Not just some fluff saying that the area has been split and SHOULD be back together, or that the neighborhood is torn, but REAL impact. This project is being estimated at $40MM and if it does not have any direct impact other then simply making people feel better, perhaps we should re-direct this (not yet ear marked) money to things that have a more easily seen direct financial impact, like getting rid of the Skyway to make room for a commercial district.
Report this
RisingDamp666
Is this a menu? Then I'll have the "Number 4", please. And don't take too long to serve it or you don't get a tip.
Report this
becker
Buffalo will only have 130,000 residents by the time that DOT makes a move on the 198 so it won't really matter. We will have thousands of vacant hosues and scores of demolished neighborhoods to turn into pocket parks and dozens of streets that will no longer be needed. By the time this gets underway there will be no need to connect to the West Side because it will be a barren wasteland of empty houses surrounding a huge Peace Bridge complex and there will be nothing worth driving to on the East Side. We can close the 33 and rebuild Humboldt Park if the State pays for it. There will be no need to connect most of the streets because they will be desolate anyway.
Report this
NSphere
This timeline is unreasonable. Not only could this project be completed much quicker if under the right guidance, but preliminary work has ALREADY BEEN DONE. Its not like this hasn't been looked at before! Right on the city's website is the Scajaquada Corridor Study ( http://city-buffalo.com/Home/NewsCalendar/Scajaquada_Corridor_Study ). This was a huge waste of time and money with nothing getting done, and unfortunately I expect this study to follow suit.
I'm sick of area planners dragging projects out and doing nothing so they can cash in on a lengthy process. This would not be acceptable in the private sector!
Report this
Nusch
I like option 3B and making this corridor usuable by pedestrians and bicyclists who wish to transverse Delaware Park west to east while complimenting the Park, a true context sensitive project. A 40-45MPH divided 4-lane will likely result in 55MPH speeds which is no change. There is no telling what kind of transportation funding the Buffalo Region will get beyond the current federal transportation bill, and with dwindling gas tax revenues and rising construction costs, there will likely need to be other funding sources identified. There are numerous transportation projects identified that never get funded. The country almost needs an Interstate Act type of transportation bill to maintain the current aging system and remove the mistakes created during that era that divided our urban areas.
Report this
galaxyjay
If you looks at the project it will probably have to take 3-5 years to complete construction alone...If they start within the next two years..completion date - 2013
Report this
Joshua
In fact, a combination of both:
2 lane road with a median - (minus) that ugly guardrail, eww
I think making a really nicely landscaped parkway to connect Delaware Park, not separate it, would be an added benefit. Can you imagine connecting Lincoln Parkway again???
Report this
MJWorthington
It should look exactly like Bidwell, etc.
Large tree lined median with path, spearating two streets with a 30-35mph speed limit. Restore the circle at Parkside to slow traffic down before hitting this stretch of reduced speed. Tie it in to look like the existing parkways to at least attempt to fake that it was part of the plan from the start ;)
Report this
11111inBlo
Joshua,
I agree that it would be nice to have a nice connecting parkway connecting Delaware park and connecting Lincoln parkway again, but I have to ask, what do you think that this would do for Buffalo? Would we see a payback on the $40MM investment that it would take to make this street more pretty? So what would happen if we re-connected Lincoln Parkway? I just don't get why we would want to spend $40MM here when currently, if is somewhat functional, and although it does create a barrier between things, I think that for the most part in the ~60 years since it was built we have found ways around it. I would really rather see this (not yet ear marked) $40MM used in an area that we could see an ROI, like helping with returning card to main street, or tearing down the skyway to make room for the new commercial district, or so many other things that this city needs must worse. Could we at least re-pave Elmwood, or how about Allen street? Drive down Allen and you think that this road has its original pavement for the turn of the century!
Buffalo really needs to pick one plan and work it to its completion. We simply do not have the resources or money to try to fix the whole city at once. I would love to see this project completed, but I'm not sure this is the best place to invest our money.
Report this
bridgebum
I agree. Although the pavement does need rehabilitation do we really want to turn it into a parkway? Do the people that live on Lincln Pkwy really want to re-connect the street? I wouldn't.
I get the feeling that most people on this site want to turn Buffalo back 50 years. Yes, it would be great to live in a city without vehicles - no noise, no pollution, no boom boxes. But, if the overall object is to revitalize Buffalo, we have to plan for revitalization. I woudn't want to do business in Buffalo if I was hindered because the only way around was through a 35 mph boulevard or through city streets. Some of the contributors here should be living in the country, and own horses.
The answer is to compromise. We need the speed to grow, and it is possible to abate the noise and visual problems. We need to compromise and get on with it.
Report this