Buffalo Rising Online

Would like to hear why this guy took the trees out.

The City ought to raise those fines a bit. It should be $1500 or $100 per dbh(diamater at breat height) inch, whichever is greater. In this case- $3100. A fine and a few hundred hours working with ReTree WNY would be appropriate.

stupid, I almost rented a place from these people. Their apartments were ok at best and what really was the selling point was bring right on Days Park, with all the trees and greenery. They just shot themselves in the foot.

Also nothing says a neighborhood is experiencing blight like a street without trees. Just look at any aerial in google earth. Where the trees start to disappear is where the crime and blight begin.

One of the city's problems is that stupid $1,500 fine, it is too low and spread out overall, I agree, it should be the fine times 3, one fine per violation.

I think that the owners should be punished for cutting down the trees and I commend the city of their swift action. Now if we could only get the city to hold commercial property owners to the same standards and prosecute as quickly as they did in this case. If City Hall practiced uniform dispensation of the laws, then the city would look a heck of lot nicer and many of our buildings would still be standing today.

Use this as the standard, quick and uniform execution of the laws that are on the books will alleviate the need for new laws and regulations.

What is being done about the tree at the NW corner of Vermont and Niagara street that had it's bark cut off from the base to about three to four feet up the tree? Is the land landlord at that property the same owner on Cottage street? Is the owner at the property at Vermont and Niagara delibretly destroying this tree?

I absolutely agree where trees have been removed crime gets worse.

Throw the book at landlords like this who are a large part of the equation that is destroying our city.

hank023 if the trees were low hangiing than they should have been pruned back instead of unjustifiable cut down. This isn't the way one acts to make a property or neighborhood safer. It is a selfish act in the extreme. He could have installed better lighting outside his properties.

The excuse that the former tenants were a problem or that their were needles does not justify any landlord to cut down city trees. The cutting down of three trees is what a lazy landlord would do to get out of raking leaves. Days Park has had their share of problems with slum landlords and destructive tenants but your coming to the defense of a landlord who takes the law into his own hands and cuts down city trees is deplorable and wrongful.

There are laws in this city that were designed to protect it. In light of this recent hatchet job I would say there is a need to increase the fines in Buffalo for cutting down trees or vandalizing them to destroy them. There are low tree branches in new and old planted trees but you don't see responsible, law abiding neighbors taking out the chain saws and cutting the trees down.

Sometimes it takes a judge to help people to see the light. This situation appears to be one of those. He got caught and thank you to the people who were outraged enough to report this to City Hall. Kudos and applause for getting this landlord an education of the laws of this city. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Owning a property does not give one an excuse to break city laws.

If this landlord is truly enlightened he will gladly replant these trees and in restitution pay to replant more trees in Buffalo. This is in restitution for his ignorance and destruction of City of Buffalo property that we paid for.

Or Sycamores- messy, messy!

al-alo sure has that right. Twice I have been thrust into darkness (once for two weeks) when branches of a huge silver maple in the neighbour's yard came down and landed on the power line serving my house.

If the city is allowed to file a lawsuit seeking replacement value for the tree, then property owners should be allowed to seek compensation from the city for damage caused by city owned trees to the property owners water and sewer lines. I like trees too, but having a large tree in front one ones property is a huge liability to the property owner. These situations put a property owner in legal limbo. They are not allowed to remove problem trees from their own property, yet they are liable for damage caused by the tree. The city is only taking "swift action because they see a chance to increase revenue by fining the property owner. Many of you seem to feel that the owner on Cottage Street is some kind of criminal, you may change your opinion when you have to shell out several thousand dollars to dig you your front lawn and replace a sewer line. Not to mention the thousands of dollars in damage that carpenter ants originating from city trees cause to homes in the city every year. If the city were to properly maintain the trees, remove them when they become too large, or allow the property owners to do so, many of these issues would be alleviated.

1. Yes the city should use more indigenous trees.

2. In Amherst when trees lift up the side walks the home owners have to immediate repair them at their own cost. This city used to be like a forest and there used to be a large forestry crew. The black ants have probably been here since before the Ancient inland sea and the Ice Age. If you have termite ants take lemon juice and put it around the parts of your house that they are going after. It is part of the WNY environment to have these ants and replacing wood they destroy is a small problem in comparison to what goes on down south. The roots do sometimes cause damage to sewer lines but the trees clean our air and make oxygen. The trees cool the city in the summer and provide nesting places for indigenous wild life.

3. The chest nut trees causes damages to cars whe the nuts fall and hit the thinner metal surfaces.

4. The benefit from trees to Buffalo is greater than the negatives.

5. Trees and linbs fall from time to time as does snow in the winter. This is what it is like to live here.

The oldest tree in Buffalo is a Sycamore. It only have a few small branches break after the storm. They like Elms are actually stronger and better urban trees. They have a slightly different structured grain than maples or others that create stronger branches more resistant to loads like the ones we saw in October.

I agree with Res that if lighting was the main 'problem' with these then a couple brighter bulbs on his own property, the front porch, would have probably did the job better. Street lights don't offer safety to anyone it is just perceived at best. If someone wants to hide. They are going to find a spot whether or not there is light. It's night time you can't expect to see like it is daytime.

If the tenants showed concern? Why, did something happen? Was it linked to lack of lighting? Or just a bunch of people who are going to fear everything whether or not there was a light or not. Sure great the tree as gone from them? Do they feel safe now? Somehow I doubt it. All that is left is less fresh air, more storm water into the system raising all of our water rates, less shade and beauty, cooling for out city. Now they can see the sidewalk at night and have to buy air conditioners because their apartments get to hot from the sun..

Good job.

I typically follow the environmental and technical forums because they are more relevant to my line of work, but I will add my words here also...I am a huge proponent of natural environment and have for years pushed for green design and urban environmental awareness however I am amazed at the publics ability to be drawn in by story spin. '2 or 3 trees felled' is not a story or even noteworthy without understanding the bigger picture. If we consider also that hundreds of trees are felled every year in the name of real estate development in this city alone I have to wonder why all the attention to this 'story'? All of this 'Lynch em!' energy makes it apparent that this is an important topic and maybe this event has a usefulness in that it raises a great dialog but my sense is that the powers that be, news media, politicians etc will drop this story pronto when they do their research and realize that the alleged perpetrator has singlehandedly done more for Allentown than the city has been willing or able to do in years. This city was built on a forest and we have to live in harmony with our surroundings...but Its an attitude like several of the postings that I see here that takes the best architects, business owners, real estate investors and environmentalists and makes us want to move to a city with an accurate perspective and forums that focus on truly important issues. Green building, Business development, sustainable energy... these are real topics.for those that are truly engaged and interested in Buffalo, the environment and our cities overall health. Not the wild musings of the rabbles reaction to right of way foliage.

I typically follow the environmental and technical forums because they are more relevant to my line of work, but I will add my words here also...I am a huge proponent of natural environment and have for years pushed for green design and urban environmental awareness however I am amazed at the publics ability to be drawn in by story spin. '2 or 3 trees felled' is not a story or even noteworthy without understanding the bigger picture. If we consider also that hundreds of trees are felled every year in the name of real estate development in this city alone I have to wonder why all the attention to this 'story'? All of this 'Lynch em!' energy makes it apparent that this is an important topic and maybe this event has a usefulness in that it raises a great dialog but my sense is that the powers that be, news media, politicians etc will drop this story pronto when they do their research and realize that the alleged perpetrator has singlehandedly done more for Allentown than the city has been willing or able to do in years. This city was built on a forest and we have to live in harmony with our surroundings...but Its an attitude like several of the postings that I see here that takes the best architects, business owners, real estate investors and environmentalists and makes us want to move to a city with an accurate perspective and forums that focus on truly important issues. Green building, Business development, sustainable energy... these are real topics.for those that are truly engaged and interested in Buffalo, the environment and our cities overall health. Not the wild musings of the rabbles reaction to right of way foliage. This has become a dialog about punitive techniques and justifications and not one that is positive and constructive.

keepbuffalobeautiful your wrong as the day is long. Three trees being wrongfully chain sawed down is a story.

It is positive and constructive to call out this wrong doing. Where dd you get "lynch em?" Demanding redress by the legal process for restitution or higher fines is not mobs calling for an execution.

Just because somebody has property or a degree is absolutely no excuse for taking the law in their own hands.

Maybe a government for, by and of the people isn't something for the high falootin but nobody has the right to lumber jack over Buffalo. Ignorance of the law is no excuse and neither is special treatment for people you deam above the law. We don't care if this person is the President of the U.S.A. or the Pope. There is no excuse for chain sawing down City of Buffalo property. Justice means being fair across all segments of this community. If we start elevating people with an education or power above the law than we might as well all move away to Iran.