Is The Pan Am House On The Move?

Is The Pan Am House On The Move?

Story Options

As the saga of Al Coppola’s Pan Am house continues to unfold, there is yet another twist in the story. This time, the house is not in jeopardy… or is it? That may all depend on where Al intends on moving it. Al’s intention is to relocate the Pan Am house somewhere in the heart of the Columbus Park-Prospect Hill neighborhood. It’s a potential move that he hopes will show how much the City of Buffalo respects its architectural heritage. “It’s amazing what is going to happen with the destruction down there,” Al told me. “I’m looking feverishly at moving the house to that neighborhood. There isn’t any reason for destroying a thriving community. Why would they want to uproot our West Side? For the Peace Bridge to expand its truck plaza?”

Al told me that he has already begun to research the move. His intention has always been to find a historic site worthy of the house… and know he says that he has finally found the best possible location. “I want to draw attention to this project,” he continued. “If people really knew what was about to happen to our city, then they would be fighting the pending destruction. This is a wakeup call for the city. Have you ever seen the interiors of those houses? Have you met the neighbors? I want the Pan Am house to be down there fighting with the rest of the houses.”

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. Buffalopundit

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 16:30

    Houses fight? Nice that Al found a new cause, but he's doing it wrong.

  2. doc

    4 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 16:49

    Pathetic. Al, give it up. Your idea is a social embarrassment and a disgrace to heritage. Like moving massive pieces on a chess board. The only thing you'll accomplish is to look like a complete ass.

  3. NBJOHN

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 16:50

    Probably get some slack for this, but.....

    Move a house to stop a bridge....... Only in Buffalo, NY

  4. Joshua

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 16:52

    I hope the house survives the move - being over 100 years old probably doesn't help.

  5. Perry

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 16:59

    This story gets more bizarre by the day. NBJohn - I feel the same way.

  6. Charger

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 17:51

    In all likelihood the house could me moved without much of a problem. Larger structures are moved all the time. But if it's really true that "his intention has always been to find a historic site worthy of the house" then he shows a complete lack of understanding about the house and historic preservation. Moving the house out of the Pan-Am neighborhood (hasn't it always been exactly where it now is?) flies in the face of every preservation doctrine. It would strip the house of much of its significance and almost certainly make it ineligible for landmark status.

  7. STEEL

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 17:52

    Goofy

  8. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 17:56

    all I have to say is slurp

  9. Texpat10

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 18:17

    This is the same guy that threatened to tear this house down a month ago and now he wants it designated a landmark? Shameful, self-promoting, self-serving and ridiculous....

  10. bidell911

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 18:34

    Is anybody else getting sick of Al Coppola using the Pan Am House as a bargaining chip? If he really cares so much for this historic property he wouldn't:

    A. Have built a non-traditional building devoid of context next to it (to put it nicely) B. Remove it from its historic context and siting, more or less foresaking its history (though I admit, greatly adding to its story) C. Relocate it to a neighborhood that threatened by emminent domain and eventual demolition D. Alreay have threatened to demolish it if his friend at the Stillwater doesn't get his way with his awning, which by the way probably got denied for something stupid like failing to have supporting documentation (i.e. renderings) depicting/outlining his proposal.

    I liked a comment from the previous story regarding the Stillwater issue stating something to the affect of, "cutting your nose off to spite your face." Great expression - should be used more often to describe the actions of our current and former (i.e. Coppola) political hacks.

    Fuming with animosity...

  11. bidell911

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 18:37

    Is anybody else getting sick of Al Coppola using the Pan Am House as a bargaining chip? If he really cares so much for this historic property he wouldn't:

    A. Have built a non-traditional building devoid of context next to it (to put it nicely) B. Remove it from its historic context and siting, more or less foresaking its history (though I admit, greatly adding to its story) C. Relocate it to a neighborhood that threatened by emminent domain and eventual demolition D. Alreay have threatened to demolish it if his friend at the Stillwater doesn't get his way with his awning, which by the way probably got denied for something stupid like failing to have supporting documentation (i.e. renderings) depicting/outlining his proposal.

    I liked a comment from the previous story regarding the Stillwater issue stating something to the affect of, "cutting your nose off to spite your face." Great expression - should be used more often to describe the actions of our current and former (i.e. Coppola) political hacks.

    Fuming with animosity...

  12. Mariner

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 19:58

    Al Coppola is a rump. This guy just likes to see his name in the paper. When he talks no one listens. He's a washed up has been, sorry a never was. This is almost as dumb as his Stillwater crying. The funny thing about that one was that the Stillwater owners wanted nothing to do with that story. Al do us all a favor and give it a rest. Your public spotlight days are over, let it go.

  13. mbhxam

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 20:13

    Al has been an ass as long as I've known his name. One of western New York's finest do-nothing elected officials...so highly thought of that his own relative ran against him. If that doesn't tell you something about this guy, I don't know what does...not that Marc(k?) is any better...but seriously...what a total political HACK!!! It is obvious this guy will do anything to keep himself relevant (even if it is a tiny amount). Al, sell the house to someone who actually cares about what it stands for, get off the public tit, and register on monster.com and find yourself a job where being competant at what you do matters for something...

  14. bizcomplete

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 21:13

    What a jackass. In a classic hostage situation, you should simply shoot the hostage. So I say knock the building down now and spare the rest of us this guy's antics.

  15. sjcooper

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 21:44

    Tear that damn building down. Al Coppola uses this damn building to protect his interests and as long as the city and the citizens bow to his demands every time he expects us to he will continue. I say Tear it down Al Coppola, we dont need you blackmailing us every time we turn around. Now people who know me would know that to bring down a historic building is against my charactor but I just can't play into Al's hands anymore. Al take that building anywhere you want, tear it down,burn it up or just put it where where the sun dont shine. GOOD BYE PAN AM HOUSE!!!

  16. al-alo

    5 ratings12345
    Feb 1st 2008, 22:05

    I heard Al's trash pickup was late. He says for every minute behind schedule pickup is next week, he'll pull up a floorboard.

  17. DCBuffaloBacker

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 00:55

    I'm totally supportive of Mr. Coppola's plans and I just hope he doesn't stop there. Hopefully he puts the house on a wagon and pulls it over to the Aud for a little bit to save that too. If only Al had thought about this sooner, we could still be showing off our beautiful HO-Oats silos and we now have our primary weapon to fight against any future progressive movements. I know it may seem like he just wants it knocked down and out of his back yard, but doesn't want to be known as the guy who knocked down the Pan Am house, so he's trying to pass the blame, but I assure you he only has good intentions. As stated above, "His intention has always been to find a historic site worthy of the house… and know he says that he has finally found the best possible location." You wouldn't want to keep a historic house in its original location, that's boring. When people come back year after year to see the tourist hot spot that is the Pan Am house, you want them to experience a totally different side of Buffalo.

  18. BuffaloBloviator

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 01:38

    If I don't find $10,000.00 in cash in my mailbox by noon, I will move my house to Spaulding Lake. For an extra $300.00, I won't take my car there either.

  19. Martin

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 08:12

    what a stupid story. it's like arguing with a 9 year old.

  20. leadi

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 09:03

    Actually - 9 year olds are a little more reasonable.....

  21. McGowan

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 10:32

    I suggest we look at the positive here. Buffalo has gained a new urban activist. One that speaks softly (very softly) and carries (or inherently made from) a very big stick. This is new frontier, headed by an inatimate object that directs Al Coppola to do strange and remarkable things. Think of all the wonderful adventures they could have together - saving the West Side from marauding bridge builders and rescusing a new restaruant with only an awning to speak of (pilot episode) - what else could Al and his herbie- the-love-bug house do around town?

  22. carlmalone

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 11:18

    Can someone say, TOOLBOX

  23. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 11:25

    ridiculous

  24. xosder

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 11:47

    McGowan, love it. New Buffalo based reality show. Contestants vie to pay Al $$$ to move the house on the floor of the Aud, in the middle of the Southtowns Connector, or on top of the rooming house on Franklin so that they can get past a zoning or planning board issue with the City. The house moves weekly.

  25. viking

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 14:41

    The idea may be off, but the intention was well-meaning, the personal attacks found here, to me are just as bad. The problem I find is that these comments would never be expressed in person and if so, only by a few who actually know Al. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but hiding behind a fence and throwing stones is cowardice.

  26. McGowan

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 15:30

    Viking - what fence?

    I resent that the decisioning making is being held hostage by someone who is so experienced with the system, someone who probably could get things done the right way. Instead, for the second time in 6 months, we find ourselves being told what should happen and under what circumstances. If you call the paper to pull this sort of thing, you leave yourself subject to the opinions of others.

    Is this really the way to get things done?

  27. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 15:33

    If this guy has something to say, why doesn't he just say it? Why all the weird posturing with the Little White Pan Am House as a hostage in this self-dramatizing spectacle? Al Coppola is becoming another Brittney Spears melodrama. An intervention seems unavoidable.

  28. viking

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 16:33

    The bridge idea in my mind sucks, I make no secret of that opinion, whether Al's idea is any better I don't know, but he publicly defends his position, most of the comments here come from the shadows, that also sucks. Anyone jumping on the soap box, hiding behind a mask to me is agitating. The comments and reasons for dissent are interesting and informative, the personal attack comments of cowards is something else.

  29. sayvanderlay

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 18:37

    Is this guy a nut, or just a prick? If he's a nut, I can sympathize with him.

  30. McGowan

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 2nd 2008, 18:44

    I'm out - no intention to stir up such vehemet feeling - certainly not the intention of my original comments nor their follow-up. Just reread - and I can see where you are coming from...

  31. michaelscreen

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 02:07

    Al Coppola's well intentioned comments seem to have brought on a deluge of acidic comments which resemble the cries of an orchestra of angry cats.To throw mud at a man whose record of community service speaks for itself through anonymous comments reeks of cowardice.

  32. viking

    3 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 08:13

    Buffalo needs another Peace Bridge, like it needs another rectum, a visit to this story demonstrates how many already exists.

  33. bflolaw

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 13:35

    Al Cappola has a political and community service record of truth, honesty and sacrifice. When the Common Council voted themselves a $10,000 pay raise, Cappola didn't take his, even though his income soley derived from his job as Councilman. Name another who's not a millionaire that has ever done that.

    Al never hired a PR executive to guide him on this Pan Am extravaganza, and if he did the expert would have told him not to threaten the Pan Am house for other principals, but even so-- Al is driving points home.Good points:

    1. The landmarks review board is all too often prissy and selfish, with a short-sighted view that forcibly resists business owners needs and attention.

    2. Al knows that if he fights hard enough the quintessential historical Buffalo waterfront neighborhood near the Peace Bridge is salvagable. Al played in those houses as a kid, knew the doctors and businessmen who lived there, were his heroes and mentors. He can still smell the kitchens brimming with the sauces that fed his childhood peers and made a neighborhood proud of its legacy.

    The Pan Am house may not be his best PR tool. Still, it's the tool he uses to stick his neck out to lay claim to honorable reaches and ideals. And he puts his name behind his beliefs-- A-L...C-A-P-P-O-L-A-- who loves Buffalo and its communities and its people.

    Those of you who mock his character, his record, even his home-- to you I say this: I can only imagine that behind the pseudonym you hide behind in order to throw stones here, that your life is in dire need of self-respect and respect for others.

    This list of comments bespeaks all that is bad about Buffalo. Your savage ignorance belittles you, not Al Cappola. His heart remains strong, while many of yours are in question os even exisiting.

    You've hurt Al Coppola's feelings today. You've hurt my felings too, both for Al, yourselves and for Buffalo.

    This post-ripping does not show a Buffalo community, but rather denotes a scene from Lord of the Flies, of a bunch of bellyless and hateful people.

    Be ashamed of yourselves.

  34. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 13:49

    And we are,bflolaw. So anyway, what's the line on the Little house surviving this spectacle? My guy in vegas has it at 5-2 but we're moving it on the flop when his next "press conference" begins. The street already has it at 3-2. I'm out if true, gotta make a living. Who's up for that truck plaza spread?

  35. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 14:05

    You can be a great guy and still make a jackass of yourself. in politics, it is what have you done for me lately, not what had you done for me a few decades ago.

    it doest do any wonders for your credibility when you: 1. make threats which you do not intend to carry out (or could do legally, or affordably). 2. when your response to perhaps a worthy cause only diminishes and distracts from the conversation.

    I respect Als previous stands, but if this is how he plans to react in the future, he needs to have his feelings hurt.

  36. BetterThanDetroit

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 14:07

    bflolaw - first of all, before all capp-ing Al's name, spell it right. It's Al Coppola. Are you insinuating he is morphine with Al Capone? Later in your post, you spell it right. Are you getting help by him to write your posts?

    Moreover, do you want someone representing our 'hoods who turned down $10k/year? Ever hear this one: "Only a fool says no to money"?

    It's icy out there. Don't forget to wear your helmet, my friend.

  37. Crazed_da_Loon

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 14:45

    Al Coppola is a dousce bag. He tried to stop the building of the downtown baseball stadium. He thought abandoning the "Rockpile" would destroy the Jefferson-Best area.

  38. EricOak

    3 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 15:23

    Aren't we missing the bigger picture here? The Peace Bridge expansion is going to destroy a wide swath of a neighborhood (and some fine homes) for a truck plaza. Rising Damp--do you speak any language other than sarcasm?

  39. RisingDamp666

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 16:17

    Indeed I do, EricOak, I speak cynicism quite fluently as well. Thanks for asking.

  40. BetterThanDetroit

    2 ratings12345
    Feb 3rd 2008, 16:55

    Ironic question of the week "Rising Damp--do you speak any language other than sarcasm?".

    EricOak, that was pure entertainment. Mind you I'm not laughing with you...you should've campaigned for Al's family member, Mark. He passed more resolutions in Albany in one day than any senator I've seen. Oh yea, I've seen a lot! Of course, a smile and handshanke goes much further than an insult. Try this approach when backing a candidate in a race.

  41. NBJOHN

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 4th 2008, 14:14

    maybe if he stops the bridge, the Buffalo Bills will not go over it

  42. viking

    0 ratings12345
    Feb 4th 2008, 17:18

    The Pan Am house has always looked out of place where it is, a better location would be near the Historical Museum, open to the public and furnished in the period it represents. The Museum should be the owner and responsible for it's upkeep and relocation. That said, from a letter Tobe sent via an Artvoice article, indicates the city position on the Peace Bridge is, it's a done deal, so much for citizen input.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links