Historic Preservation of Columbus Park - Prospect Hill Neighborhood

Historic Preservation of Columbus Park - Prospect Hill Neighborhood

Story Options

"Unless history lives in the present, it has no future."

This line is spoken at the end of this video put out by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The Columbus Park -Prospect Hill neighborhood is featured in the NTHP video of 2008’s 11 Most Endangered Historic Places.

Endangered has become a key word in the bridge controversy. Houses, humans, birds, fish and the Menn bridge design are all in danger depending on who you talk to. The following is a trip through the past.

The neighborhood and its history are really quite interesting.

Residents don't want to lose their houses.

The bridge designs, old and new, are at issue because of fish and birds, but politicians aren't having any of that, then or now.

Consider the yea (from UB) or nay (from the Buffalo News) view on wildlife issues, and the conundrum continues.

As for the humans, it's an issue about health as much as housing, but in the end it may simply be a matter of who has the best argument for their own cause.

And then there's a question about which neighborhood to save.

Peter Joe Certo, Columbus Park homeowner and Niagara Gateway Columbus Park Association (NGCPA) Treasurer stressed his opinion about the proposed bridge and truck plaza, saying,"We're going forward with our own plans for a greener, better version of what's planned."

Certo insists, "We don't want to stop progress, we want a better way that will be intermodal and better. It's silly to say, 'We deserve a signature bridge.' That's not the point, and maybe we can educate people by continuing to talk, learn and educate them."

The designation from the National Trust could go a long way toward your cause, Mr. Certo.

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. onestarmartin

    8 ratings12345
    May 20th, 17:25

    What I do not understand is this bridge proposal/study have been going on for nearly 20 years now, yet all of a sudden everyone is on this bandwagon to stop it in order to save this area, [most of which is actually pretty non discript]. Where was everyone 10 years ago, even 5 years ago? BRO has only taken into account the few residents that are fighting this battle, has anyone bothered to interview the other homeowners that are waiting to sell, those that have moved on and are either renting their property or waiting for the authority's to purchase? There happen to be two sets of homeowners in the area, those against and those for. Very one sided blogs here BRO. Let the flogging and single star hits begin...

  2. RaChaCha

    3 ratings12345
    May 20th, 17:52

    This is a truly wonderful neighborhood, well worth fighting for and saving. The fine folks who live there are ready, willing, and able to do just that, and they are making their case, lining up allies, and marshaling their forces quite effectively. This national recognition is hard-earned and very exciting, and will change the complexion of the debate and make many sit up and take notice. Decent coverage in the Buffalo News today, as well, at: http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/350827.html

  3. STEEL

    7 ratings12345
    May 20th, 18:40

    Martin probably thinks that the Kensington was a good idea too.

    This is actually not an old issue. It cropped up when the Canadian Plaza was dropped. Why should the city continue to roll over every time an official says that this or that part of the city is worthless unless it is paved over.

    It is time to stop this kind of arrogant and destructive planning!

  4. Downtownjunkie

    3 ratings12345
    May 20th, 18:45

    The neighborhood is absolutely worth saving... Martin yes you are right that this battle could have and probably should have been waged 20 years ago but maybe the people of this area have finally realized enough is enough and wised up! The Peace Bridge itself is historic and I think that if the Peace Bridge Authority wised up like the rest of us and took its head out of its ass then maybe they would see that the best alternative is to construct a new bridge downriver where the ambassador group wants to build or even farther downriver on GI. Front Park was one of our cities greatest assets and they stole it from us lets demand it back! Keep up the great work all those involved in this fight! While we are fighting lets demand that the PBA be dismantled and a new regional entity is created overseeing all of the areas border crossings.

  5. peterjoe

    3 ratings12345
    May 20th, 19:35

    Martin, there more than a "few residents" holding this position. And the residents have been there--and involved--the entire time. As time passes you will see the true breath of this movement.

    And I regret my hasty and less than thoughtful comments in the story. My most fervent hope is that, because of the issues raised by the neighborhood and its allies, the PBA will finally conform to the law and their irrevocably flawed and shortsighted plan will evolve into one for the ages: a green bridge in a brown field connected to an intermodal transportation network. Truly a bridge to the future.

  6. peterjoe

    0 ratings12345
    May 20th, 19:36

    Martin, there more than a "few residents" holding this position. And the residents have been there--and involved--the entire time. As time passes you will see the true breath of this movement.

    And I regret my hasty and less than thoughtful comments in the story. My most fervent hope is that, because of the issues raised by the neighborhood and its allies, the PBA will finally conform to the law and their irrevocably flawed and shortsighted plan will evolve into one for the ages: a green bridge in a brown field connected to an intermodal transportation network. Truly a bridge to the future.

  7. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    May 20th, 21:03

    If every project got pushed through half of allentown would have been demolished for the 190 - 33 connection. Martin's house would probably look like those sad homes along the 33 now. It is a good neighborhood and worth fighting for and I am glad that the residents stepped up to the plate to stop it. Something I wish more people did during the 190 and 33 construction.

    This is different though, it isn't about stopping the project as it is going to happen but instead garner enough support for supporting what is best for all parties. Doesn't it make economic and logistical sense to consolidate space and uses for the bridge security. Like every other government agency has been doing for years. police stations, libraries, firehouses. The way to survive for the long haul is to reduce overhead. Shared border does that AND gives the neighborhood, the city and the region something to be proud of.

  8. hamp

    1 ratings12345
    May 20th, 22:13

    This is a beautiful neighborhood that should be saved.

    One reason why this has not been a big issue until recently is because the Peace Bridge never said which properties they were taking. When they said the shared boarder was "dead", and they needed to demolish so many houses, then the homeowners began to organize.

    The long delayed process is the PBA's fault, as they have never been completely upfront with their plans. They steered the so called public process to meet their needs, not the public's. And then when the bird issue came up, they scrapped the cable bridge without any public input. When the shared boarder didn't work, they didn't present other options, they just decided to demolish all these houses, again without a public process. No wonder there is a public outcry now.

    It makes no sense to be taking down all of these houses to put in a bridge. There is no study that even shows that there will be a positive impact to the local economy. Let's not repeat the mistakes of the 1960's.

  9. Rez

    1 ratings12345
    May 20th, 22:55

    If people want to sell their homes and move no problem. We just don't want these homes replaced by a truck plaza after your gone and we are still here.

  10. EricOak

    2 ratings12345
    May 20th, 23:21

    Martin: nondescript? Open your eyes.

  11. RaChaCha

    1 ratings12345
    May 21st, 07:13

    Ron Rieinas' response, fresh from this morning's Buffalo News: http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/story/351725.html

    I especially like the comments in the article from my congresswoman, Louise Slaughter:

    "

    But Rep. Louise M. Slaughter, D-Fairport, said the preservationists’ concerns offer more reason to re-examine “shared border management,” which would locate the truck inspection plaza on the Canadian side of the bridge.

    “We understand that whatever we do there is going to be permanent,” she said. “And most of us are very much concerned that what we are about to do there is a mistake.”

    "

  12. Deliking

    2 ratings12345
    May 21st, 08:59

    Someone should talk to the people who have experienced this expansion on the Canadian side. Other than those who have a business interest in it, the general consensus is the result sucks. The Canadian project divided Fort Erie and made visiting the town more difficult. Actually most tourist supported business declined after the project was completed.

  13. Activist

    4 ratings12345
    May 21st, 10:35

    I can appreciate the frustration in having one more group coming forward to save the neighborhood. How many times do we argue the same arguments? How many times can we work for compromise only to have a handful of people leap forward to say it's a crock of --- despite all of the careful point by point deliberations? Granted, NO ONE wants an ugly bridge surrounded by an ugly neighborhood. YES, the ideal solution is cross border management, but we worked on that for years only to have it dashed by George W's crew. While we struggle to make the best of a really --- situation, people with really arrogant attitudes leap forward to save the day, because those who've been working on this for years are just ---holes and not smart enough to do it right. Sick of the attitudes and ego.

    My edict? Shut the --- up and put everything on hold until George W (talk about the quintessential ---hole) is out of office and start over with shared border management. STOP the attitudes and grandstanding. I'm not impressed.

  14. stephenjames716

    1 ratings12345
    May 21st, 10:37

    I really hope that this stupid project gets crumpled up and tossed into the garbage can. I understand the need to expand the commerce that happens with an updated bridge, but find a way that doesn't include destroying a historic neighborhood that is unique to our area.

  15. Activist

    0 ratings12345
    May 21st, 10:40

    I can appreciate the frustration in having one more group coming forward to save the neighborhood. How many times do we argue the same arguments? How many times can we work for compromise only to have a handful of people leap forward to say it's a crock of (bleep) despite all of the careful point by point deliberations? Granted, NO ONE wants an ugly bridge surrounded by an ugly, dangerous truck plaza. YES, the ideal solution is shared border management, but we worked on that for years only to have it dashed by George W's crew. While we struggle to make the best of a really (bleep) situation, people with really arrogant attitudes leap forward to save the day, because those who've been working on this for years are just (bleep)holes and not smart enough to do it right. Sick of the attitudes and ego. They took it upon themselves to unilaterally save the day without working with the people who've been working on this problem for decades. Tacky, tacky!

    My edict? Shut the (bleep) up and TOGETHER we can insist to put everything on hold until George W (talk about the quintessential bleephole) is out of office and start over with shared border management. STOP the attitudes and grandstanding. I'm not impressed.

  16. peterjoe

    0 ratings12345
    May 21st, 12:52

    PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT: Please join the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the residents of the Columbus Park-Prospect Hill neighborhood in welcoming our distinction as one of eleven national historic sites to save. Visit our beautiful, vibrant and significant neighborhood and participate in the celebration to commemorate this honor:

    THURSDAY MAY 22, 2008 NOON (promptly) FRONT PARK

    Your presence will demonstrate that preservation matters in our community!

  17. Rez

    1 ratings12345
    May 21st, 13:00

    What most Buffalonians don't realize is that the Ontario government designated Fort Erie as an economic development zone. This is why Reinas is pushing Buffalo so hard. Buffalo should be designated a people development zone.

    We don't really need a new bridge.

    We need an expanded and shared border crossing facility in Fort Erie. Start the talks in January 2009 and tell the Buffalo and Fort Erie Peace Bridge Authority that their is still a government in Buffalo that was elected by the people of the West Side for, and by, and of the people.

    The Peace Bridge is acting like a despot.

  18. MJWorthington

    1 ratings12345
    May 21st, 13:06

    If commercial traffic is the almighty savior we need a dedicated commercial bridge and plaza. Submitting Grand Island, the QEW and 190 are about 3.5mi apart. Near Netherby Road in ON and Love Rd on GI there is nothing but sporadically developed land. a 4-lane access to the 190 and a truck inspection plaza would be mostly taking empty land and not effect 10,000s of near by residents. Grand Island should love it since we claim this is a huge road block to jobs here. they can have all of them that sprout up ;)

    The only issue is the Canadian Side already put a crap load of money into thier side. But that's what we get with half planning and not looking at the larger picture. Do we keep throwing money into mistakes or do we regroup and do what's right for residents, traffic flow, land usage etc.? There is no reason that all 4 bridges should not be coordinated in traffic flow and best use of land.

    I houses are expendable, take the small cluster of hoouses in lewistion beteen they highway and the power authority and move the cemetaries. Lots of room there surrounded by highways. ;)

  19. reflip

    6 ratings12345
    May 21st, 14:32

    It is jaw-droppingly, gut-wrenchingly stunning that in this century and at this juncture in American life (with oil prices being what they are) that anyone out there is supportive of a proposal to demolish an entire neighborhood in favor of a truck plaza.

    It is inexcusable and indefensible. I have yet to hear anyone describe why this is even necessary other than "trucks back up on the bridge." Ever been on the Cross Bronx Expressway? Nobody is proposing expanding the Cross Bronx because the traffic is "hurting the economy." Nobody believes that the economy of either New York or New Jersey is suffering because it takes an hour and a half or more to get over the George Washington Bridge. And, even if people out there do believe that, they're not stupid enough to think they should be able to demolish neighborhoods to allow trucks to pass more freely. Much like eugenics and free love, that idea has run its course. Except, I guess, in Buffalo.

    Bravo to all who stand up to oppose this tyranny.

  20. Joshua

    4 ratings12345
    May 21st, 15:00

    The bridge should not be in the City, period. It should be built downstream or closer to where the I-190 hits the I-290. There are no homes on this side. This would be a win-win.

  21. allfit

    4 ratings12345
    May 21st, 15:25

    It is proposed because Buffalo is perceived as a wasteland of vacant buildings and uneducated welfare cases. This neighborhood means very little to most of the people in New York, they just see this as a bunch of NIMBY complaints. The arguments presented so far do little to dispel these perceptions.

    Most people in WNY are tired and suspicious of the Historic Trust angle used whenever there is opposition to a project. In my opinion, the designation of the vacant and vandalized H-O grain silo as an important element of our history and worthy of preservation revealed how much of a sham this designation really is. Many people that I talk to agree that the historic designation is a tool for obstruction more than it is a tool for preservation. After all, why does it take the proposed demolition of a structure to get people to see its historical significance? Ponderous man, f...ing ponderous.

  22. pgf1948

    2 ratings12345
    May 21st, 22:11

    non-descript; NON-descript; NON-DESCRIPT!

    Ridiculous.

  23. MikeCloutier

    0 ratings12345
    May 25th, 07:32

    The advancement of false information screws everything up. I noted with interest the comment by Deliking and would like to respond to his points. Given this late date following the post, I doubt anyone will read this, but I'll put it out there anyway as part of the public record.

    The Canadian plaza construction did not divide the town. There is a small group of businessmen (a core of about six) who have had a 20-year hate-on for Ron Rienas in particular and who would like to sell their land to the Detroit interests who have floated the idea of a bridge between Fort Erie's North End (Bridgeburg) and Black Rock. Their enmity toward Rienas and the opportunity to sell out from the Jarvis Street area have driven their opposition. The overwhelming majority of people in Fort Erie approve of the plaza redesign. There's only one weakness: when waiting for Canadian Customs to clear the line, I don't get to enjoy the view of the river because I'm not waiting on the bridge, I'm waiting in the plaza, and that fountain makes me want to pee. The good thing about it, though, is that there is no queue out onto Baird Drive and the Thruway.

    Deliking says it has made it more difficult to visit Fort Erie. There's another load of BS. The configuration has changed, indeed. No more exit to Goderich Street but the benefit to the whole system outweighs the cost of having a back-door shortcut to the South End. The closing of Garrison Road to direct access to the bridge is a good thing. The fact that Garrison Road was informally voted one of the 10 worst roads in Ontario is testament to that. The wear and tear has destroyed that road and the Town and Region and Province are finally spending a couple million good Canadian dollars to fix it. It is a main thoroughfare for access to Fort Erie's South End and the North End. The worst thing in the world is to clog it with international traffic bound for Buffalo.

    Speaking of good Canadian dollars, Deliking states tourist business in Fort Erie has dropped off since the plaza was reconfigured. Geez, I wonder if that has anything to do with the dollar? Ya think?

    On another point, the idea that a whole new infrastructure should be set up so a private capitalist can build a bridge a couple of kilometres down the river is just stupid. The highways, government services all exist at the Peace Bridge. Why pave over hundreds of acres of land for another bridge? Will the CNR give up it's Fort Erie land? Doubt it very much. Therefore, at least somet of the land used for a bridge, plazas and connecting roads will not be brownfield.

    The Grand Island idea? Again, infrastructure would be duplicated and the land out there is even more valuable as a natural resource.

    I do not like the idea of taking over people's homes, especially if they don't want to leave, to drive the interests of trade and tourism, but the US plaza now just doesn't work.

    This idea of a signature bridge makes me scratch my head. A new Peace Bridge would look like any another cable-stayed suspension bridge -- quick to erect and fairly cheap -- so where's the signature? The five arches, Parker truss and curved approach design of the Peace Bridge is unique in the world. Thank you, thank you Mr. and Mrs. Common Tern for eliminating the Twin Pin Pricks. (It's not actually called Pin Pricks, but I didn't want to get reported.)

    One good tern deserves another.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links