Great Lakes Compact Signed by Every Great Lakes State – Now on to Washington
(This is a follow up post on the Great Lakes Compact, an agreement to stop large –scale, out of basin water diversions from the Great Lakes. Great Lakes United did several posts on the Compact in January. To see those posts, click here, and here.)
The eight Great Lakes states have sent a unified message to the rest of the country: our water is staying here. Along with our Canadian Great Lakes neighbors, Ontario and Quebec, the Great Lakes region has finally taken official steps to stop out of basin water diversions. This week, the last state, Michigan, has passed the Great Lakes Compact. The Compact is a legally binding mechanism to ban dangerous out of basin diversions from happening in the U.S. With Michigan’s approval, the compact must now go on to Congress for ratification and then finally the White House.
Timing is very crucial for the Compact. As we are all aware, upstate New York and many Great Lakes’ communities are losing population to areas like Arizona and Las Vegas. With a shift in population, goes a shift in Congressional representation. The 2010 United States Census will most likely lead to a loss in seats for our region and gain for the water thirsty arid regions with growing populations.
It is important that we let our federal congressmen and senators know of the importance of ratifying the Compact. While it may seem unlikely that Phoenix would ever get Lake Erie’s waters, diversions are not uncommon. In-basin diversions occur daily, with water eventually returning to the Lakes. But, if a community is one mile outside of the Basin and its water goes on to another watershed, like the Mississippi River, for example, it is a net loss. If a diversion to a community near the Lakes is allowed now, where can the line be drawn later? It is a dangerous slippery slope that could lead our water thousands of miles away.
For more information and what citizens can do to help the Compact, visit the Council for Great Lakes Governor’s website here.
Also, be sure to contact Senators Clinton and Schumer and all of our representatives in Congress. They were here last week to celebrate the Commercial Slip. Lets make sure they are committed to keeping water in it.
What Others Have To Say
What Do You Think?
Related Articles
-
Science Firsthand - Partners in Discovery
At an after school program recently, some kids were doing homework, some were on computers and some were in the gym. But a small group of fourth-graders were designing and building boats out of household products- plastic cups, construction paper, and tape. They had been building and modifying their boats throughout the week, trying a few different design and construction plans. Now they were ready to race them across a tub of water, using a fan to power them across. After deal … - Today, 8:00am
- Continue Reading
- Join the conversation
-
Griffis III Latest Sculpture - A Polarizing Piece
Larry Griffis III is a well-known Buffalo figure whose experience with steel is not only his passion, but his birthright. Some may know of his father’s sculpture park in South Buffalo, founded in the 60s, but his son has taken up the torch and is now a world-renowned sculpture. What started with the father has continued with the son. Griffis III’s work is starting to appear in spots in Buffalo and now, to see one of his works, you need look no further than Forest Lawn Chapel.
… - Today, 7:07am
- Continue Reading
- Join the conversation
-
Christmas With Vocalis at Karpeles
Though they only began in 2002, the 18-person Vocalis Chamber Choir have already made a name for themselves. Vocalis’ first CD was praised by the Buffalo News, is played regularly on WNED-FM, and they perform regularly through WNY, Toronto, and Pittsburgh. Their 2008-2009 season, which only includes eight or nine performances in WNY, will begin at Karpeles Manuscript Museum with their holiday concert dubbed, “Christmas at the Karpeles.”
This Saturday, December 6th, at 8PM, … - Today, 7:07am
- Continue Reading
- Join the conversation
-
So Long Elmwood, Hello University District
Ever since the Falafel Bar opened on Allen Street, it was only a matter of time before the Elmwood location was no longer for this world. I spoke to owner, Oded Rauvenpoor, who told me that the decision to close came when he was at a crossroads. He found himself happy with his Allentown diggs, but began eying another part of the city for the Elmwood restaurant. In the end, Oded decided that he wanted to try his hand in the University District (3476 Main Street). I guess there was … - Yesterday, 8:41pm
- Continue Reading
- 9 Comments
Comment Options
carl
this is really good news, for both the economy, and the environment.
Report this
carl
this is great news for both the economy, and the environment.
Report this
RonR
Great news!
Report this
smythie
Damn right...You want our water? Then live here.
Report this
Ike
While this is great and all, it is largely superfluous
There's a treaty with Canada from the turn of the century that prohibits either side from doing anything that would "injure" the other
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boundary_Waters_Treaty
You can bet your ass that there would be a major international incident if any significant water diversion occurred to the southwest
Report this
smythie
Yeah, but do you think Canada would really take any action (like stop exporting beer and hockey players to us..the horror!) if we sent water elsewhere? Just wondering. In all seriousness, though, I'm glad to hear there's an actual treaty concerning this. thanks for the info, Ike.
Report this
TDSBLO
Smythie, I agree. Though I don't know how great the danger is or if there is any danger at all that water could be diverted.
Buffalonians and others have had to go where the resources are for decades (i.e. Jobs.) Now maybe it is time for the jobs and people to come back up to our resources?? Wishful and hipocritical thinking, maybe, as I am living in PA now anyways.
Report this
NateDrag
Ike - yes the bounday waters treat of 1909 exists, but there are two very important problems with it - first of all, it only deals with very large diversions - ones that effect the 'flow or levels or the Great Lakes' - it would do nothing with thousands of small diversions - death by a millions straws if you will - second - the treaty only deals with boundary waters, waters that are split between the united states and canada - and since lake michigan lies entirely in the united states, the treaty has no power over water diverted from that lake - which would effect the water in every lake
so no, i wouldn't say that this compact is superfluous at all - it is actually very important and necessary
for tons of great info on the threat of water diversions, read 'great lakes water wars' by peter annin - tells about the diversions that have been proposed, have occured, and all of the politics involved -
Report this
NateDrag
Ike - yes the bounday waters treat of 1909 exists, but there are two very important problems with it - first of all, it only deals with very large diversions - ones that effect the 'flow or levels or the Great Lakes' - it would do nothing with thousands of small diversions - death by a millions straws if you will - second - the treaty only deals with boundary waters, waters that are split between the united states and canada - and since lake michigan lies entirely in the united states, the treaty has no power over water diverted from that lake - which would effect the water in every lake
so no, i wouldn't say that this compact is superfluous at all - it is actually very important and necessary
for tons of great info on the threat of water diversions, read 'great lakes water wars' by peter annin - tells about the diversions that have been proposed, have occured, and all of the politics involved -
Report this
honda88
Is a mass water diversion even feasible? I read somewhere about a study that was conducted over 30 years ago. It estimated (back then) that it would cost between $100-300 billion dollars to construct. I don't have time to figure out the inflation adjusted numbers.
Report this