Team Effort To Build A Downtown Stadium

So you want an exciting project to move forward downtown, but you're not sure how to go about getting your voice heard? If that's the case, maybe you should consider setting up a grassroots marketing effort that includes viral online marketing, in-person temporary kiosks, and a host of other inexpensive-yet-informative endeavors. At the end of the day, the more people who are familiar with an effort and support the effort the better. Then maybe, just maybe, someone with some pull might just jump on-board when he or she sees the momentum building.
Over the last few days I've been hearing more and more about a grassroots effort to get a new green Buffalo Bills football stadium (and convention center) built somewhere downtown (preferably on the waterfront). The organization behind the effort is Build A Better Buffalo. Like many other Buffalonians, these die-hard fans (of Buffalo and The Bills), don't want to wake up one day only to realize that a golden opportunity was squandered. What if we had rallied harder to keep The Bills here? What if there was a way to lead an initiative to not only keep the team in Buffalo, but to see to it that the effort included exciting growth for the city?
If these idea are of interest to you, consider paying a visit to BuffaloStadium.org. There you will learn about the unusual grassroots campaign started by 'The Fans of Buffalo'. And while you're there, don't forget to sign the petition.

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view …
Caroline Kennedy was in town for a visit with our mayor yesterday. A possible choice to succeed US Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kennedy's name has been mentioned along with that of Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo) and our own Byron Brown, among others.
Certainly, Kennedy has "been around politics" all of her life, which is to say she was born into a family of politicos and lived in the White House--neither of which would necessarily f …
Free light rail rides on downtown's above ground section could be derailed thanks to the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority's budget mess. That is the news coming out of a Buffalo Place meeting this morning. Facing a budget shortfall and reduced State operating assistance, the NFTA is scrambling for new revenue sources and is contemplating charging for rides along the lengthy downtown pedestrian mall.




Comment Options
AvaRouge
Anywhere but on the water. Thank you.
Report this
al-alo
sound great ~ imagine the wind whipping thru, Dolphins shivering on the bench. or how about tailgating on a boat?
the only thing, can it be a green stadium without public transportation access?
Report this
chrishawley
Gag me with a spoon!
Report this
Colin
A new stadium isn't the answer. The Bills "problem" isn't the stadium, it's that the team can't charge the same prices or attract the same level of local sponsorship as bigger market teams. A new stadium wouldn't substantively change that.
It's odd that we're even discussing the Bills having a problem. They're valued at $885 million, up from the $25,000 Wilson invested in 1960.
Report this
buffawakening
i think a new stadium woud be great. it would not solve the bill's problem as colin pointed out, but it would help solve alot of the city's.
Report this
lulu
Please no stadium in Metro Buffalo, especially not on the waterfront! A huge behemoth structure that is publicly used only a handful of days per year = fail for the City or waterfront.
Report this
AvaRouge
Buff- Solve alot of the city's problems?!?! Such as, and how so? Sure it'll take up 100+ acres of underutilized land and it'll be busy for 10 days/year. All for $500 million or so. Good deal! As stated above- the problem isn't with the stadium, it is with the market size and corporate $$$$ to put asses in boxes and premium seats.
Report this
mwh
A studium downtown would be great, as long as it was clear the Bills future is going to be in Buffalo. Building a $500mil building with no tenants would be awful. But the only way it would help the Bills and the city of Buffalo is if it was truly a multi-use facility with a retractable roof:
~The Bills stadium, the UB Bulls stadium (bring students dt), basketball game capable (local colleges, NCAA final four), convention center, banquet center (proms, weddings), year-round restaurants and bars....
Report this
nyc
if you put all the parking in structured or underground parking and build into a mixed use waterfront neighborhood, sure spend the 900 million, otherwise forget it. OP is good for me.
Report this
needles
Exactly why would a metro stadium be a detriment? There are so many downtown stadiums that work so well, how is Buffalo somehow different than the rest of the world? When I lived in Pittsburgh, downtown on a football Sunday was filled with thousands upon thousands. Bars, restaurants, hotels, etc. ...and get this... pedestrian traffic!!!
Report this
whynot
The People of Erie County shouldn't pay a dime in taxpayer revenue for a new stadium unless the ownership, or partial ownership, of the team is offered to the People of Erie County. We should set-up a community based non-profit ownership structure similar to Green Bay's. I know that there are rules prohibiting this in the NFL, but the owners can vote to change these rules. Allow for community involvement and guarantee a future in Buffalo, or else forget about the stadium because it is just too risky for us.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
I'm with Colin and Lulu about this. No, no, no, a million times no to taxpayer funding for a new stadium or convention center. Let those kinds of projects be privately funded as they are in some other cities, or nothing. Let the Bills stay in the current stadium (which as Colin points out isn't the problem anyway - but some don't want to hear that), or let them explore other options in the northern part of the Toronto-Buffalo mega region, or whatever they want to do where ever. There's way too many other more important priorites for public spending, and taxes are already way too high around here.
Report this
Sitler
I'm a big Bills fan...and prefer the stadium to reside out in Orchard Park...more condusive to tailgating and very accessible.
Report this
UrbanGuy
I have faith, that even by some miraculous event there was money for a new stadium, the community would realize that having it on the waterfront would be the worst possible use of that land. TRUE there is nothing there now...and it has been planned (read: failed) to death, but that would be the lowest value to bring to that acreage.
Report this
Balth
I'm with you AtwaterLouse... We ALREADY pay for the stadium in Orchard Park. What kind of return are we getting on that? You do know that the TV contract pays for all of the players salaries, so any profit goes to Ralph. SO WHAT if he isnt making 60 million a year like Jerry Jones. Ralph ONLY makes a few million a year. OH POOR THING, HE ONLY MADE 3 MILLION DOLLARS LAST YEAR. Gee, I only make like 40 grand a year. The NFL is a HUGE machine that wants to maximize profit, let them build a stadium. It is an absolute joke that they put cities at their mercy to make them build publicly funded stadiums, or else they threaten to move the team. SO MOVE IT THEN! Yes, I am a HUGE Bills fan, and it would be upsetting to see them leave, but we are taxed to DEATH! For a league that makes millions upon millions of profits to force cities to subsidize stadiums is a slap in the face!
Report this
buffawakening
avarouge- help as in having a huge economic impact on buffalo. in 1996 the bills had a 115 million dollar impact on the economy. it has only gone up since then. employ more than 1,500 people part time and many full time. bring in 70,000 people to the city. fill the bars and restraunts. reintroduce the city to the suburbanites. im not saying you have to build it directly on the waterfront, anywhere would be fine.
but it probably will never happen. even if it did get funding, which it wont because we are dirt poor, city people like you would have a fit that the land that hasnt been used for decades will be used for a stadium. no, you guys would rather have it empty for future generations.
and as for your arugument that it will only be busy for 10 days a year. thats 10 more days than it is right now.
but all this is just wishful thinking. we could never afford somthing like this.
Report this
distas
i usewd to think that a waterfront stadium would be the best use of our empty waterfront. i now have come to realize that this is not the case. i do feel the stadium should be downtown due to so many vacant brownfields. the brownfield on southpark next to the buffalo river would be a great place, as would the perry projects site consiudering there are already parking lots available at HSBC arena and the 190 is directly adjacent.
at the same time i like the ralph because its one of the largest NFL venues in the country currently and i cant see a new stadium seating anywhere close to what we have now. every new stadium that has been built in recent years seems to be around 60,000 capacity........thats nothing compared to our current 75,000 or so seat capacity which creates an atmosphere unlike any other in the NFL. also if a new stadium is built ticket prices are bound to go up. the reason the buffalo market is even able to sell out 75,000 seats is due to our old dumpy stadium which keeps the ticket prices low....i say keep the ralph for as long as possible!!!
GO BILLS!!!!!
Report this
ExWNYer
There is nothing wrong with RWS. We have as many suites as do the Pats, for example. The problem is that they have the corporations that can pay $100,000 per game as oppossed to us at $100,000 a year at RWS. A better idea would be to put an 75,000 seat stadium in Ft. Erie by the racetrack or St. Catts. Still call them the Bills, but play 1or 2 games at RWS, 5 at the new place and 1 at Skydome. That way we are able to attract the kind of money from TO that puts us up there with the the bigger cities. I would not like to see it, but we will need to be realistic. Buffalo still gets the prestige and tha fans can realistically go to every game and the team will be making money and there is no reason for them to leave the greater Buffalo metro. I was adamant that the Bills stay full tiem in OP, but you can see that will not work. We'll lose them for good.
Report this
RonR
Colin...
While you hit the nail on the head in regards to the problem....I do think a new stadium WOULD in fact solve it.
For the Bills to be successful and stay, they are going to need to become a regional draw. They will need to get fans from as far as Syracuse and Toronto...mainly Toronto to come to games. Maybe not season ticket holders but 1-2 games. They also need to increase the corporate revenue that comes from luxury boxes.
With the location of the current stadium...this is next to impossible. Think about the "experience" for someone from Toronto today....
Maybe you drive in on late Saturday and get a hotel room but most likely you drive in on the day of the game. Traffic is a bitch in and out. Even if you did stay overnight, you would have to drive to the game in OP from most likely downtown. Not that attractive. Most CEO's or regional fans would not make the game unless they are die hard fans because of this. It is simply a pain in the ass to "entertain" guests in OP unless you and your guests live in WNY.
Also, a game at the Ralph out in the elements is not the best experience unless you are a die hard fan. People are not going to drive all that way AND pay the higher ticket prices to sit out in the elements.
Simply put, under the current configuration, the deck is stacked against the Bills.
Now say there was a downtown stadium....that was a dome. The sales pitch could be to spend a WEEKEND in Buffalo. Drive in from Toronto or Rochester/Syracuse early Saturday. Check in and enjoy Buffalo. Maybe head to the Elmwood Strip or visit one of the many museums if that is your thing. They are only a $5-$10/5 min cab ride away. If not, just stay downtown and have a blast in one of the bars and great places to eat.
**Maybe a night at the casino would also be involved...but that is a different story*****
Get a good nights sleep and roll out of bed around 10am. Eat ANOTHER meal downtown and add some beer to the tab. Around 12:30 roll into the new DOWNTOWN INDOOR stadium for the game.
After the game you walk back to the hotel and maybe wait out the traffic with another order of wings....no beers this time as you have to drive. Around 6PM you hit the road. You are back home in Toronto or Syracuse before 9...even faster if Rochester.
IF done right, a 8 weekends a year would mean 20k to 30k OUT OF TOWN fans coming to Buffalo. That could mean 5k rooms booked 8 weekends a year. That could mean 30k people eating 1-4 meals outside of the stadium in downtown. That could mean thousands of extra visits to the ABK or Penny. Thousands of extra shoppers on the Emlwood strip or even.....shopping downtown.
Report this
Assaroni
bills will be gone in 3 years anyway, who cares
Report this
distas
i usewd to think that a waterfront stadium would be the best use of our empty waterfront. i now have come to realize that this is not the case. i do feel the stadium should be downtown due to so many vacant brownfields. the brownfield on southpark next to the buffalo river would be a great place, as would the perry projects site consiudering there are already parking lots available at HSBC arena and the 190 is directly adjacent.
at the same time i like the ralph because its one of the largest NFL venues in the country currently and i cant see a new stadium seating anywhere close to what we have now. every new stadium that has been built in recent years seems to be around 60,000 capacity........thats nothing compared to our current 75,000 or so seat capacity which creates an atmosphere unlike any other in the NFL. also if a new stadium is built ticket prices are bound to go up. the reason the buffalo market is even able to sell out 75,000 seats is due to our old dumpy stadium which keeps the ticket prices low....i say keep the ralph for as long as possible!!!
GO BILLS!!!!!
Report this
RonR
I also agree that public financing should not be used for a new stadium. Public land should be given but the cost of construction should be taken on by the owner of the team.
This is not an impossible sale but the right owner and situation needs to be created.
Report this
distas
also, tailgating is the reason most people come to bills games!!!! if you take away the parking, you then lose the best part about the games aloow with a whoile lot of fans. no trailgating is a major complaint of canadians when the bills play in Toronto because its ILLEGAL there!!!!
Report this
rydog71
RonR nailed it on the head but I think a dome is not the right fight. If cities like Chicago, Cleveland and Pittsburgh can build new stadiums without domes than why do we need one? Our weather is almost identical. The Bills playing outdoors is part of our culture and our resilience as Buffalonians.
Report this
ElmwoodBoy
Make the new stadium a conventon center too, put it on the ouiter harbor, and have programming & events 300+ days a year.
Report this
Sullymon54
Did anyone see what Goodell Said?
http://www.buffalonews.com/101/story/496398.html
This chump sounds like every high school football speech I ever got just before we got crushed by 52 points that heart was all that counted. Also eerily similar to when Rudy Giuliani gave the carefully crafted answer of "Because its New York" to the question of 'How he thought NYC could reverse the trend of corporations chosing to move there headquarters out of NYC rather than stay because of the high corporate taxes in the U.S. or high property taxes in the City?'
Things don't happen because you really really want them too, they happen for because you provide something someone else can't or because there's a lot of money in it, that's it. Thanks jackass, way to do you're best to protect you're local team.
Report this
meanoldman
buffalo sports teams are the least of our worries. what good is a professional team in a city full of people that can't find jobs to support there families, let alone afford the outrageous prices to watch overpaid men play a sport that they supposedly played because they loved the game! get real people losing the bills wouldn't be the end of the world. they don't play in the city anyway. how about beaches and boardwalks on some of the best lakeside sites in the country. i say tourists not tailgating football fans!!!!
Report this
cookjr
Assaroni your a typical loser!
We as a region should be proactive on this topic. The politians should contact the bills, ralph wilson, and roger goodell. Relocation talk is nothing more then speculation. The Buffalo Bills is Buffalo's and New York's team to lose. We are the only team to actually play in the State of New York.
As with any good relationship open/honest lines of communication are the key to success. We need to have open lines of communication with the powers that be. We do not even know how much ralph makes per year. Some say around 10 million is a good estimate. I think he can make double or triple that if you bring in a proactive business man like tom golisano and a master marketer of the likes of larry quinn. We all know he does not maximize his revenue.(Ralph Wilson Stadium instead of HSBC STADIUM or Seneca Stadium) Why the Bills are making money is they carry NO DEBT. An 850 million dollar price tag is very high and would take decades to return for the new owner. Remember Ralph paid the same price for the bills as i did for my last car. If Golisano or Jacobs step up im sure they would be for a part community owned partnership similar to the green bay packers. Buffalo should not be scared... The bills have, do, and will succeed in WNY. With our connection with rochester, toronto, and history of fans all over the world it is time to secure the future. I am glad to hear this website exist, it is a small step in the right direction.
Report this
RonR
@distas - The hard truth is if people want to be calling the Bills...the Buffalo Bills in 10 years, the average joe is going to be priced out of the games. Or at least priced out of season tickets. The reality of the NFL is you need to make money. Ticket prices are going to need to increase by 30%-40%. If people are pissed about this...they can watch the Toronto Bills...
Report this
AtwaterLouse
That petition the article links to is very extreme. It starts:
'We, the undersigned, support any and all measures designed to improve the City of Buffalo through the development of a stadium and convention center on the Buffalo waterfront. ...'
Any and all measures. Great, just great. At least it's good to see in the comments here that at least there's some real opposition to this.
Report this
Metropolis
Cleveland's waterfront is nothing great and they have their stadium and airport on the lake.
Keep it where it is and keep prices low.
Report this
meanoldman
KEEP PRICES LOW!!! what buffalo bills game are you going to.. they haven't been low for years.
Report this
HelenWheels
Horrible idea - see, I am a reservationist and I believe all the 100+ year-old trash in that area would be placed in danger of elimination. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Report this
al-alo
1. if there is anything we have a lot of, its waterfront. it runs from Riverside to South Buffalo - not including islands, peninsulas, or archipelagos. it isnt really a scarce resource.
2. this area has no near term redevelopment proposals or prospects.
3. yes, football doesnt bring much time, say 8 games a year (stupid TO), but a convention center and concert venue do.
4. as far as I see, nobody said anything about public funding the construction. relax.
5. and ill say it, perhaps a smaller, less tailgating (READ DRUNK) crowd is preferable to what we have now.
6. who said their would be no parking? who would blg a staduim without a parking garage?
dont be so afraid of change
Report this
Colin
1. I think RonR is right that there is some benefit to both the Bills and the area from a new stadium. I just think that those benefits would be fairly marginal, and probably not worth big time public dollars.
2. Anyone who cares about keeping the Bills in town needs to pay careful attention to how they frame this issue. The team doesn't need a new stadium -- or to relocate -- in order to be successful. The team is already wildly successful, a $25k investment that is now worth $885 million.
Report this
blackrocklifer
Wow- I agree with atwater and atwater agrees with colin, that rarely happens so we must be right. Stadiums should be payed for by team owners and financed by the fans. (or possibly the players since they got the big bucks)
Report this
meanoldman
i totally agree! just one top rated players salary could build a stadium.
Report this
heathersmiles
Why aren't those top rated athletes considered "GREEDY" for making their money? Why aren't the top rated movie stars considered "GREEDY" for making millions on movies that flop?
Report this
georged
This will never happen. Who in the world would spring the bill, and really for what?
The Bills will be gone, and Buffalo is not big enough to sponser events like the Final Four, as someone else mentioned (plus they would never be chosen.) As far as the UB Bulls...come on, they can't even fill their own little stadium.
Colin, you mention that the Bills are very sucessfully financially, which they are right now. That is because they have no debt. When Wilson dies they new owner will assume quite a bit of debt, if there even is someone in WNY that has that kind of $$ and is even interested. Do you really think that ticket porices would remain at the low level they are now? The Bills haven't even sold out games in recent years, and their last home playoff game was blacked out locally. Rich Stadium is antiquated by today's standards as well. Make-shift cheap luxury suites that have problems selling with no corporate presence in Buffalo.
So an owner that wants to keep a team here has to factor in buying a team in a city that is losing population at one of the highest rates in the nation, no corporate presence, one of the oldest stadiums, and a fan base that has not had a long string of sellouts-and prices are going to have to go up significantly to survive. Also factor in the fact the collective bargaining agreement is coming up, making it sure that salaries will not be capped as low.
Good luck finding an owner to stick it out here. LA is looking better all the time.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
al-alo, #4 of your 18:22 list is mistaken. This group's petition is addressed to our city, county, and state govts and a bunch of politicians - asking them to take "any and all" measures for this. Do you suppose they're asking the addressees to fund it with their own personal money, or their surplus campaign funds? Sounds to me like this group is begging for public funding. If they change their opening and address it to Golisano, Jacobs, Rich, etc. and if they also change "any and all measures" to "any and all privately funded measures" - then that would be very different.
Here's how that group's petition starts:
'TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUFFALO, COUNTY OF ERIE, STATE OF NEW YORK; MAYOR BYRON BROWN; MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF THE ERIE COUNTY HARBOR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; CONGRESSMAN HIGGINS; AND MEMBERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY AND SENATE REPRESENTING THE CITY OF BUFFALO:
We, the undersigned, support any and all measures designed to improve the City of Buffalo through the development of a stadium and convention center on the Buffalo waterfront. We recognize that waterfront development will stimulate the economy, health, and vitality of Western New York and encourage spin-off economic benefits from its sports teams, tourism, and entertainment opportunities for citizens far and wide. We pledge our continued support to those who work to ensure that the vision of a waterfront stadium in Buffalo becomes a reality. ...'
(the shouting capital letters are how they wrote it - I'm not shouting that opening at you)
Report this
al-alo
Louse,
Im more than willing to debate the role of public funding of stadiums. I think that is more than fair and warranted (I personally think there is a bit more of a grey area than many here would consider). However, Im not entirely sure that public funding is an outright demand by this group. . . not that they would turn it down, Im sure. "Any and all measures" might include partial public ownership for all we know.
Clearly, as written, its a little light on the details. Quite probably, intentionally so.
Here is a question: Who paid for HSBC and Dunn Tire? I wasnt 'round town then, and I dont honestly know. But how are those sports different, and what lessons on stadium funding can be gleaned?
Report this
Biniszkiewicz
happy to see so much good sense in these comments. New stadium, especially on waterfront, is a bad idea. Public (taxpayer) funding for same is a terrible idea. Ditto the convention center.
Report this
hamp
The last thing we need on the waterfront is a stadium to block it off.
The Times article reiterated the importance of fixing the basics, like housing and schools. This is where we need to focus our attention.
From the posts on this site, it seems most people understand this.
There are no silver bullets. And the benefits of convention centers and stadiums are grossly exagerated.
Report this
al-alo
ill say one last thing.
I think the waters are a bit muddy. lets distill the argument down a bit:
whether anyone likes it or not, the Bills will be gone in a decade or so if a new stadium is not agreed upon. whatever the location, whatever the form, whatever the funding source, if you dont want the Bills to follow the Braves to LA (or TO), there most likely needs to be a new stadium somewhere in WNY.
the first question is, can the Bills (or are they willing) to finance the build themselves? to follow up: if a new Bills stadium required public funding, what would be a reasonable return on the investment - both directly and indirectly - in the community?
i dont know that answer, and unless youre a closet statistician, you dont know either.
Report this
meanoldman
i thought it was a given that all pro athletes and actors are GREEDY, and for the most part care only for there best interests. if they really cared they would work for millions less so the middle class, and poor could afford to see them perform the jobs they used to do for FREE because they loved the profession.
Report this
whynot
The problem is that there aren't enough opportunities for all athletes and actors, so too many struggle while the greedy few make millions. We need to distribute the opportunities to ensure that everyone who wants to do be a pro athlete or professional actor has a chance at it.
Report this
meanoldman
whynot- you make a very good point!
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
The higher priority is a new 450k sqft convention and conference center, preferably around a rewatered Ohio Basin.
The HealhNow, Richs & Buffalo State set the example for downtown growing north along Niagara Street
The Life Sciences in the Fruit Belt has set the example for downtown growing north along radial streets such as Main, Michigan and Jefferson.
The Central Terminal and Larkin District have set the example for downtown growing East along Broadway, Seneca and Exchange.
Now a new Convention/Conference Center must anchor the southern end of the Cobblestone District for downtown.
Only after a new convention/conference center are built should a new stadium be discussed because....in all reality...a new stadium has to be linked to a long term commitment to the Bills and to bringing Canadians to Buffalo for the games and staying in our hotels (instead of sending Bills Games to Toronto). This is feasible since many Canadians and Torontonians come for Sabres Games.
If this is the game plan then Buffalo is going to need the hotel rooms from the convention center first....of course if this is the plan then it wouldnt hurt to have the stadium, Niagara Falls, downtown and the Airport connected via Light Rail.
The success of the bills is going to require canadians and that means hotel rooms and transportation. Again it comes down to infrastructure!
Report this
RonR
@Colin.
The team is successful under the current owner. Under the current owner there is no need for a new stadium.
However, when ownership changes, someone or some group is going to pay close to 1BILLION for the team. They are going to want to make their money back and that simply is not possible in OP.
The economics stop working when Ralph kicks it.
Report this
sonyactivision
What is the value of an NFL franchise when financing a purchase is impossible? And who pays cash for a team costing over half a billion dollars? A lot of the comments here seem stuck in 2005. But what's even harder to understand is how a city in Buffalo's fragile state could afford a $1-1.5 billion proposition. You could raise the sales tax a quarter cent, sell special lottery tickets, naming rights, skyboxes, charge $10 to park at the game (which would barely cover the cost of a huge ramp that would have to be built near the above site), and add a $1 "Bills surcharge" to every plate of buffalo wings that gets sold to bar patrons and not come close to raising that kind of dough. And don't even think to phone Albany, not with Paterson's "$42 billion deficit". At the end of the day, raising $1,000 from every man woman and child in the region is just not an option. The Buffalo Bills was a historic moment that will pass with Ralph Wilson. I will always be grateful to him for the wonderful years he gave us.
Report this
sonyactivision
...And a new convention center is just ridiculous right now. They can't even book enough events in Las Vegas which is in a death spiral. That world is over. Period. Convention and meeting facilities that are built into private hotel properties makes much more sense. If Buffalo needs a big barn for community events, I'd recommend doing something with our armories or putting the money into the BCT. Otherwise, wait until we see the other side of this nasty recession.
Report this
jattea
Cleveland's airport is nowhere NEAR the waterfront...
Report this
allfit
I was too young to fully remember the last stadium controversy, does anyone have the details?
I remember debates about location and domed vs. open, etc... what were the arguments and are they still relevant today?
Report this
gaustad
I always believed this is the key component to turning the city around.....however far fetched, if we were able to build a state of the art venue near HSBC arena and keep the Bills in town, I believe it would be the spark plug we are looking for...no city loves their team more than Buffalo...
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
sonyactivism, a new convention and conference center is even more relevant now because people do not want the travel expense so they are booking locally and regionally. That means that Buffalo doesnt have to compete with the same facilities that it once did.
Buffalo's Convention Center is smaller than Albany, Rochester, Syracuse and Erie, PA.....not to mention Cleveland and Pittsburgh. Furthermore, Buffalo also only spends a fraction of what those cities spend because Erie County will not give them the entire Bed Tax to promote our region.....
Furthermore, as we are learning from Bass Pro...just about anything of significant scale in Buffalo takes between 5-10 years so there is absolutely nothing wrong with pursuing this now.
LITTLE SPENDING TO PROMOTE THE AREA AND OUTDATED AND UNDERSIZED FACILITIES MEAN LOSSES OF HUNDREDS OF JOBS AND MILLIONS IN LOST REVENUE.
One other thing....speaking of convention and conference centers. The Buffalo State, Medaille and Canisius triad makes the Richardson a perfect location for a College/Community Conferece Center and this area could easily justify a hotel similar to the hotels and facilities we are seeing in Amherst.
Lastly, I will say that there are many reasons why its going to be difficult to keep the bills but for another reason its going to be nearly impossible for anyone or any corporation to get a bank to finance a billion dollars, especially for a sports team. The end of the story isnt written for the Bills but do not attempt to close the book.
EVEN WITH A STATE DEFICIT, THE BILLS ARE THE ONLY FOOTBALL TEAM LOCATED IN NYS...AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED FROM NYS EASILY...as we learned when Ralph was facing down the NFL on franchise contracts.
Report this
jamesbflo
when ralph passes he wont be able to leave the team to his family due to the 45 percent estate tax (dont believe the line that his daughter doesnt want it, rather she cant afford it) therefore the bills will have to be sold. who in buffalo has half a billion dollars to buy the team?
The city/state/federal economies are a mess and we shouldnt count on any help to build a new stadium (500 mil or 1 billion for green as they're proposing) the owner would have to front the bill... unfortunately i dont see that happening.
i do believe tailgating would work downtown (it does in other cities), some restaurants/bars would see increased business (at the expense of those in op), there might be a few extra hotel beds filled but most torontonians stay downtown already. The biggest benefit (excluding the convention center because honestly thats just something thrown in to make the venue seem more usable) would simply be having a pretty new building downtown which looks nice on postcards.
dont get me wrong, i would love to see it, but i'm not holding my breath. this community should have stood up 30 years ago when they decided to build in op.
Report this
sonyactivision
@jattea, I think that reference was to Cleveland's Burke Lakefront Airport which is just general aviation.
Report this
tonyarmani
Teams that don't win don't bring fans. Fans that don't go don't pay. Teams that don't get money from paying fans don't stay.
Plain and simple.
Report this
Biniszkiewicz
To those who harbor the notion that a new convention center would help us economically, download yourselves an enjoyable and informative read. It will make you sing a different tune.:
www.brookings.edu/reports/2005/01cities_sanders/20050117_conventioncenters.pdf
Convention centers are not the economic engines for which people hope. Don't waste the tax money.
Report this
allentowndiva
lol...use the money to attract industry. for an area that has to use county tax money to put the name of the teams owner on the stadium instead of a corporate sponcor speaks vloumns!
Report this
RonR
@ Biz
Convention Centers work if they are private. The brookings report is based on Public financed convention centers. As we all know, when projects are run by the public sector, they hardly ever create the desired economic impact. The main reasons two fold IMO. The first is the cost of the project when run the "public sector" is in play. Labor costs, construction costs and the like all run extremely high...we all know the reasons. The second and main reason is the booking of conventions. Most conventions are booked years in advance. Because of this, if Buffalo were to expand their convention center, they would have to wait out years to get into the que and face an enormous amount of competition from other areas.
What is bucking the trend is private convention center corporations like Gaylord Ent. Essentially what they do is build multiple complexes around the US and sign up conventions on multi year contracts. So when they launch a new complex, they simply fold in their already existing book of business AND go after new business. This eliminates the waiting time to be put in the "que" so to speak.
Additional to this, since these centers are privately financed, they do not have the same costs involved as publicly financed projects. Which makes them cheaper to build AND cheaper to run. Thus allowing for profits to be paid back much much sooner.
Report this
Joshua
I signed the petition, stating that I am in favor of a Downtown dome stadium. -J. Hall
Report this
Auburner
Build a better Buffalo? How about starting with fixing the school system. Like any structure of this type of magnitude, to "Build a Better Buffalo" you need to start at it's foundation.
Report this
Auburner
Allfit, I blieve, if memory serves me correctly, the land vested for the Stadium was similar to that of the Amherst Campus of UB. The reason UB is not located downtown, in my opinion one of the biggest blunders ever committed in city history (#1 believing the ships from the Welland Canal would backtrack and stop in Buffalo instead of continuing on to Detroit and Chicago) was due to legislators in Albany who had purchased the land, privately, and sold it to the State of New York to build on that very same land. A classic case of "Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely". It is my belief, people, correct me if I am wrong, it was a long time ago, Wilson was going to move the team and in the seventies there was suburban flight and War Memorial was in, what was then, considered to be a dangerous part of town; post race riots. I believe that the land was purchased privately and sold to Erie County at a hefty profit. Erie was pressured by the public to keep the Bills, pressured by investors of the land, a group of powerful people to build it there and the county placed it there.... Rich Products came up with a large sum of money to fund the state of the art scoreboard, hence naming rights.
Again, my facts on the stadium are somewhat vague but that is the best I can recall.
Report this
meanoldman
we are way past industry ,how about tourism. we have a big brown brick that we call our convention center. it has done nothing for the city since it was built. we are the gateway to western new yorks greatest features, all within miles of downtown. BILLS! i can barely afford them, let alone there ticket prices. come to the city and spend your money on real culture, like local restaurant's,theater, parks, or just talking to our good neighbors. look around we are what was america was built on.
Report this
DanielSack
Bad idea. What is "green" about abandoning the existing stadium and parking lots and building anew?
Also read about the folly of publicly owned convention centers at http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/bromley/CCS/
Newell - you already know very well how convention centers suck money out of public coffers and life out of downtowns. Stadiums are even worse because they are more expensive, larger, and used less frequently.
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
Look nay-sayers can stand opposed to a new convention center but none of you can see the bigger picture.
The bigger picture is simple....if Buffalo and Erie County do not build a new 450k convention and conference and hotel complex then the BED TAX is just going to be spent on unions and patronage and waste.
The savings from folding the BED TAX into the general budget provides and excuse for Albany to reduce its state aid.
Its the same pattern over and over...if Albany creates unfunded mandates and the more local resources are stripped into the general budget the more Albany rewards us with state aid reductions...the result is year after year our infrastructure and the jobs creating infrastructure get postponed, delayed or cancelled.
In the same pattern...if its not albany then its a civil servants union contract or as Brown demonstrates another 3 deputy mayor positions and stacks of patronage get created out of the general budget.
Buffalo doesnt get its stadiums or convention centers, it doesnt get its streets paved, sewars and water mains repaired (wasting 50%...explaining rates 50% higher than national average), curbs and sidewalks dont get fixed, signs and lights dont get maintained, trees do not get planted, neighborhoods dont get supported.
You can sight whatever statistics you want...but id rather have the (taxes) money dedicated to promoting tourism and financing conventions/conferences actually used for it rather than pissed away. Id rather have the building and the jobs and the promotions rather than have it pissed away via patronage, unions and albany.
Your basing your judgements that a penny saved is a penny earned. Yea but not in New York State government!
Report this
RobH
Downtown stadium. The bad idea that never dies.
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
The only thing Albany, Erie County and Buffalo cannot screw the taxpayer on are bricks and morter infrastructure!
I dont trust one penny of my taxes in the general budget!
You niaive sods can believe that a penny saved is a penny earned...but your fools.
For Albany, Erie County and Buffalo...a penny saved is a penny spent elsewhere
A PENNY SAVED IS NOT EVEN A PENNY SAVED, NOR IS IT A PENNY INVESTED OR A PENNY REFUNDED!
Give me a convention and conference center...and repaved/recobbled streets because then and only then will I feel like I got something for the taxes I paid.
But when I pay taxes and I see truant kids and have to spend $500-$1000 on new wheel bearings/suspension...etc....and a decaying city whose inspectors ignore troubled buildings to harrass any civic activist that dares complain they get off their dunkin donuts stool do their job.
NYS doesnt work that way....so yeah...Id rather have a $450k sqft convention and conference center rather than yet another bloated and whiny union contract, another deputy mayor, another albany unfunded mandated/cut in state aid.
The only way to turn Buffalo around is to invest!
Report this
buffawakening
allfit... as to stadium history they were also looking to build a stadium (with a dome) in lancaster, but the town voted it down.
Report this
allentowndiva
Buffalo21st, you will never see your money spent on what you want, not when 51% of our taxes go to social services and the rest goes to keep city and county uinon members employed.
Report this
sonyactivision
Most american cities have either abandoned plans to build new convention centers or scaled additions back greatly. The tourism that these albatrosses were supposed to spur has been a mirage and the reality is that most convention guests never stray far from their hotels. In the case of buffalo, that would be doubly true. In the end, convention centers are just showy buildings that lend little to the streets and neighborhoods around them and that almost always are underbooked and poorly programmed. Forget that noise.
Report this
DPH
This is a tough topic, with obviously many opinions and perspectives.
People in Buffalo have to be somewhat consistent and have their viewpoints jive with one another.
So often I hear complaints that we (Buffalo) does not attract the larger employers/companies to the area, etc... On the other hand many people oppose the spending required of keeping a major sports team with a modern venue in the area.
I have news for those who oppose and don't understand the importance of keeping your last two pro sports teams in Buffalo; Major companies consider this factor with great weight when selecting a region to move to or stay with. Believe it, it is very real. If you think that the companies that have left the area over the past decade left a negative impact in the area, just wait until the Bills are gone and the Sabres will soon follow. Companies will also follow, believe it.
The financial and quality of life impacts of keeping these teams in the WNY area are worth spending taxpayer dollars for. You need to take the time to understand that it is not just about the team or their owner's profits. It's not about only having 10 home games per year at that venue. These venues, if designed properly in concert with the adjoining properties, will/should create 12 mo/year activity and become a great asset to the region. The parking areas and other components be shared, resulting in an efficient, even green, design.
You cannot look at it from the standpoint of spending 500mil or so. You have to look at it from the standpoint of Buffalo is on the brink of "making it" or "breaking it". There is some great positive development going on in the WNY area and anchoring it with the assurance of keeping these sports teams in the WNY area is very important.
In Sarasota here, we lost the opportunity to bring the Red Sox training facility to town, just a year after loosing the Cinci Reds to another state. Many companies view this as a huge negative. Sarasota sent a message to future companies considering relocation to the area, that we are not serious about making things happen and took for granted the message that this sends to outside companies. The residents are upset, but the politicians thought they did the right thing, saving 20mil. However, they are losing much more than that in credibility and dedication to their growing future. Buffalo needs to observe these examples and not repeat those mistakes.
Do not say 'why', I say "Why Not"?
Report this
DPH
This is a tough topic, with obviously many opinions and perspectives.
People in Buffalo have to be somewhat consistent and have their viewpoints jive with one another.
So often I hear complaints that we (Buffalo) does not attract the larger employers/companies to the area, etc... On the other hand many people oppose the spending required of keeping a major sports team with a modern venue in the area.
I have news for those who oppose and don't understand the importance of keeping your last two pro sports teams in Buffalo; Major companies consider this factor with great weight when selecting a region to move to or stay with. Believe it, it is very real. If you think that the companies that have left the area over the past decade left a negative impact in the area, just wait until the Bills are gone and the Sabres will soon follow. Companies will also follow, believe it.
The financial and quality of life impacts of keeping these teams in the WNY area are worth spending taxpayer dollars for. You need to take the time to understand that it is not just about the team or their owner's profits. It's not about only having 10 home games per year at that venue. These venues, if designed properly in concert with the adjoining properties, will/should create 12 mo/year activity and become a great asset to the region. The parking areas and other components be shared, resulting in an efficient, even green, design.
You cannot look at it from the standpoint of spending 500mil or so. You have to look at it from the standpoint of Buffalo is on the brink of "making it" or "breaking it". There is some great positive development going on in the WNY area and anchoring it with the assurance of keeping these sports teams in the WNY area is very important.
In Sarasota here, we lost the opportunity to bring the Red Sox training facility to town, just a year after loosing the Cinci Reds to another state. Many companies view this as a huge negative. Sarasota sent a message to future companies considering relocation to the area, that we are not serious about making things happen and took for granted the message that this sends to outside companies. The residents are upset, but the politicians thought they did the right thing, saving 20mil. However, they are losing much more than that in credibility and dedication to their growing future. Buffalo needs to observe these examples and not repeat those mistakes.
Do not say 'why', I say "Why Not"?
Report this
DanielSack
Bad idea. What is "green" about abandoning the existing stadium and parking lots and building anew?
Also read about the folly of publicly owned convention centers at http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/bromley/CCS/
Newell - you already know very well how convention centers suck money out of public coffers and life out of downtowns. Stadiums are even worse because they are more expensive, larger, and used less frequently.
Report this
meanoldman
the 4 & 1 bills now at the bottom of the afc east . the new stadium is as important as there record over the years. losers don't need a stadium,they should become motivational speakers for U.B. players.. maybe they can beat those guys! (not a chance).
Report this
ToughintheStreets
Convention Centers are assumed to be loss leaders most of the time. You don't need a study to tell anyone that they don't turn profit. Thats like doing a study to determine that the sky is blue. The purpose of a center is to generate economic impact which they do. The thought being that you take a few million dollars in loss to generate hundreds of millions in economic impact and visitor spending to pump new cash into the local economy. The trick is to build an appropriately sized center and keep the loss to a minimum.
So yes Centers do take some money out of public coffers but not nearly as much as some of these comments suggest and they fail to note the economic impact that the centers generate.
How they suck life out of downtowns is a mystery to me. If you put hundreds or thousands of people in the heart of a downtown area for a convention I would guess that the surrounding businesses would see a boost in business. I travel for work and whenever we go to a convention or conference we always go out to eat or drink before and after we head to the conference. Its not like these things are casinos that offer every amenity possible and give guests no reason to leave.
think a perfect event to prove this point would be the upcoming disco at the current convention center. Go downtown and look around. Attendees will be easy to pick out in their costumes around downtown before and after the event. My guess is that this event doesn't suck the life out of downtown but actually puts some back in. And I bet the surrounding businesses would agree.
Besides has anyone ever walked around downtown in the middle of the work week? Not like we can do much worse than what we have now.
So yes we need a new convention center and stadium and the idea in the story is a nice thought but not on the water where its proposed.
Report this
DanielSack
"ToughintheStreets"
If you really want to understand how convention centers suck life and money from cities read Hank Bromley's articles that are linked to in my post above. I cannot explain it all in a post here. And since it is so well researched and written about elsewhere there is no need to.
In a few sentences it is easy to explain the benefits. It seems so obvious - all those people for hotels, restaurants, taxi drivers and caterers. But it just is not that simple. And like many things understanding the details takes some work and time.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Also informative is the Brookings analysis that Bini's 11:25 comment above links to. Good comparisons of convention center "expected" impacts claimed when CC projects are being sold to the public vs what actually happens years later. It looks at a wide variety of U.S. cities who tried CCs. Also discusses declining long term trends for convention business.
Report this
blackrocklifer
Atwater- Wow- we agree again, 2 days in a row.
Report this
ToughintheStreets
I've read most of that stuff thank you. And no it isn't that simple and yes there are downsides. And I wish I had the time to pick apart the entire argument but I don't so I'll do my best: The article you mention Sack discusses the Convention Center proposed on the Mohawk site. I never said thats where it should be bulit. The article may be right there is probably a better place for it. But I'll address it as is.
1.) There is an argument that the businesses currently in that site generate $50 million in sales yearly and 600 or so jobs while the CC would generate $36m in economic impact and 500 "lousy jobs". In essence losing money. Not entirely true. Yes those businesses would have to relocate and some would move out of the city perhaps but how many would actually stop operation? Few if any. So your actually adding $36M not losing $14M as the article suggests. Businesses would have to close to the tune of $37M to lose money as the article would suggest.
2.) The articles would aslo have you believe that jobs would be lost. Again I would argue how many businesses would actually stop operation? I saw nowhere in the article where you or the author asked the businesses that question (or whether or not they would move out of the city). It also says nothing of how many good full time jobs would be created and how many would be lousy, just more assumptions of those numbers. So no not all the jobs would be secure full-time jobs but you can't prove that full time jobs would be lost either.
3.) the article states that the CVB is funded by the bed tax. Not entirely true. The County takes in over $7M in hotel bed tax revenue. It returns just $2.5M to the CVB. The County keeps the rest for the general fund and uses it elsewhere. If you factor in $2M a year the county would have to put back into the CC that still leaves the County up $2.5M. A larger CC would increase that bed tax revenue and thus increase the money the county recieves.
4.) Re: the $50M in sales generated by the current Mohawk businesses. How much of that is from outside of the city? the county? the state? How much is just recycled money? A CC 's economic impact is almost entirely new money pumped in from outside of the county and state.
5.) The article references long gaps between functions. Why? A larger CC would be able to hold more events thus allowing it to be filled more often. It references Chicago trying to get small and medium sized business and Buffalo not being able to compete. Buffalo would be able to compete for the simple reason of affordability. Cheaper room rates, rental fees, plane tickets etc.
6.) Finally it implies that the CC is the reason that no businesses have been created and some have been lost around it. Really? You mean to tell me the only reason that businesses have not thrived down there is the Convention Center? Am I the only one that find that hard to believe. It also states in one of the interviews that the Ballpark has done nothing for the downtown area. Wheres the research to back that claim up?
Look the articles are right a CC is no silver bullet magical answer and you have to be careful about how you build it and where and I wont say the Mohawk site is the best or only place but the articles are also guilty of what it accuses pro CC people of; vague, sweeping, and easily explained arguments without enough research. I'll agree with you on one point Sack: it's not that simple.
Report this
Biniszkiewicz
Thoughinthestreets: you seem to have responded to some of the Artvoice articles, but what about the Brookings study? None of your responses address any issues raised there, and those arguments are very strong. The prospect of positive economic impact from a convention center in a city such as ours is a myth, empirically speaking. Look to the report.
Beyond the Brookings Institute study, consider some anecdotal information. I used to work for a local hotel (Marriott). On a somewhat regular basis we in the hotel sales field would partner with the CVB to try to bring conventions to town. Also, a group of us (representing the various Buffalo area properties) would work the Albany market, trolling for state-wide organizations (which typically must meet annually somewhere within NYS). There are a ton of associations which hold conventions. Every profession imaginable has some convention or other. Lots of fish in that sea, must be good for us, right?
Not so fast. First, understand that the organization sponsoring the convention will generally derive a great portion of its operating budget from the annual convention. Typically 50% or more of the annual operational budget of a professional organization are earned during the convention. Attract large numbers and the convention is a money making success. Fail to generate good attendance and the organization can experience a financial disaster. Every hotel (from those hotels participating in the convention) will kick back a few bucks per room night to the organization bringing the business. Also, attendance fees for the programs that participants pay are padded to include good profit for the organization. This annual meeting is the bread and butter of the organization. Attract lots of attendees and money piles up. Attract few attendees and not enough money piles up. It's a once a year opportunity to mine for gold. So attendance numbers are critical.
That said, understand that nationally the concept of Buffalo as a destination for conventions is a joke. Not because those planning the activities can't be charmed by our considerable conveniences and attractions. But rather because their attendees have a bad opinion about Buffalo. That leads to low attendance. That leads to financial difficulty for the organization. A successful convention is predicated on the idea that the destination is somewhere that attendees want to go anyway. If the idea of travel to a destination city appeals to the attendees, then there will be good attendance. Buffalo does not draw attendees. We have a bad reputation nationally as a place take a vacation. We're not high on the list of places Joe Average desires to see. Nationally, we cannot draw what a Vegas or Chicago or Boston or NY will for the same convention. Everybody wants to see San Francisco sometime in their life. Convention is there? Maybe I'll go. Convention's in Buffalo? Maybe I'll skip the expense this year. That's the dynamic. Nationally, we can't compete.
But what about the state market? Lots of organizations are state wide. Many have charters requiring an annual convention within the state (one organization I know was such-and-such-organization of NYS-and-Bermuda, so that they could have their convention in Bermuda every year).
It turns out we're not so competitive statewide either. Why not? Low attendance. Every time the convention is downstate, everybody from downstate participates and lots from upstate say to themselves: sure, I'll go to NYC for the show. Do a little sight seeing while I'm there.
Albany's a draw. It's not far from NY (short enough drive) and there's a chance to meet with legislators and other powers-that-be to effect change beneficial to the organization (plus it's the backyard of many of the organizational offices). Syracuse is even well located, as it's three hours from either extreme, so attendance is not bad.
Buffalo is located at the western edge of the state. We're a long drive from Long Island. Whenever statewide organizations hold conferences here the attendance suffers compared to locations closer to NYC. Why? Because NYC residents don't all think there's enough to do and see in Buffalo to trouble themselves to come here. So significant numbers of them skip. Many executive directors I spoke with told of attendance figures being half in Buffalo what they get downstate. This is a financially untenable proposition to planners dependent upon the revenue.
Even with the nicest facility, our reputation and location work against us in this market. Read the Brookings study and then add this geographical component and you will see that the prospects for positive cash flow don't work. It's not, as you suggest, like we need to spend the money to prime the pump. It's more like the old saw: How do you make a small fortune? Start with a big one! We'd spend more than we'd make, bottom line.
Report this
ToughintheStreets
I actually did address some of the Brookings argument. They make the same argument about a CC operating at a loss. Again, thats like doing a study to determine that the sky is blue and if you read you'll see that even at a $2M operating cost to the county they would still be up $2.5M from Bed Tax alone as its stands now. The Brookings study makes much better arguments but still has flaws. Its main flaw being that even the "small market" cities it mentions are significantly larger in CC size than Buffalo. Currently the CC is what 70k sq feet? And when there was a push for a new CC what was the sq footage of that one 125 - 150k? Significantly lower than the cities mentioned. it also uses cities who invest in other downtown business improvements (arenas, malls, stadium etc.) as part of what it calls a downtown rejuvenation plan. Using that argument it lumps in those "opportunity costs" to the cost of the CC and then labels it a failure. You can't factor in those figures when computing the cost because then yes of course it looks like the CC failed. But your not judging it on its merit alone.
Regarding falling attendance, I get it. But it appears as if attendance is dropping everywhere including the big sexy cities that you cite. So clearly people aren't just going to these places like New York because they are sexy.
My point is that the Brookings argument is based on a much larger scale than Buffalo and thus is not a good indicator. T Heres why: Buffalo's CC is too small and thus can't
Report this
ToughintheStreets
My point is that the Brookings argument is based on a much larger scale than Buffalo and thus is not a good indicator. The "regional centers" it mentions are significantly larger than the current Buffalo CC and what was proposed. It mentions Charlottes 280K sq/ft center as regional. The proposed CC was barely half of that. Buffalo's CC is too small and outdated and cant attract conventions. a larger cc would be able to attract more conventions and even if they have smaller attendance numbers it would still be more than what we currently have. Thus more economic impact and more money from outside the city and state.
You make the argument that people have a poor opinion of buffalo but as a member of the hospitality industry it was your job to change that perception and get people here. Arguing that Syracuse is more fitting for a state convention is rediculous. Syracuse is the armpit of NYS and people will come to Buffalo before they will go to Syracuse we simply have more to offer.
And while yes more people may be inclined to travel to sexier cities, as I already stated Buffalo is more cost effective for travel and accomodations which makes them competitive.
Report this
ToughintheStreets
my apologies for the sloppiness of those posts.
Report this
RonR
@ Biniszkiewicz
I noticed you overlooked the major flaw in the brookings report in that is was based on Public and not Private convention centers. A big factor IMO. I hear a lot of what you are saying but if you want to move from hypothetical to numbers...please cite the flaws with the gains in those numbers.
Now, to your post about the perspective of hotel operations...I have never worked in one so I can see where you are coming from. But I have worked the trade show circuit for years. Both as an attendee and as a vendor and I can tell you that people look at conventions as business opportunities just as much as vacations on the company dime. What I also found is you never really "see" New York, San Francisco or Chicago when you go to conventions. The reason is most of your day is spent at the convention center. Outside of that, you find a place to eat and a good bar for a couple of drinks. Then it is back to your room to get some sleep for the next day. It is VERY HARD these days to get a company to pick up an extra night at a hotel so they can take in the sights. Maybe that was the case 20 years ago but it really is not the case today.
Business organizations are looking for conventions where they can get the biggest booth or send the most people to get the biggest return. If you are spending $300 a night for hotels and $100 a day per diem for food...that usually means a smaller booth or less people. As others have pointed out, and what you choose to ignore, is attending a conference in Buffalo is much cheaper. That is a selling point. A damn good selling point. Regardless of the economy.
Now I will also give you Buffalo has an image problem. No doubt about that. It does not have a problem in showing visitors to the Queen City, in fact just the opposite. But it does have a problem selling people on the fact that they will have a good time. So with this being the case...how do you change it?
In my opinion, the ONLY way to change it is to get people to experience it. Like it or not, not many people visit Buffalo these days without a reason. There is no need for the "we're talking proud" bull shit. People need to experience Buffalo first hand...because when they do they change their mind. It is as simple as that.
The real problem with the image of Buffalo is who is providing the spin. On one side you have BRO type commentary that Buffalo is the greatest place on earth. Hardly realistic. On the other side, you have people who trash Buffalo even when they are living there. What Buffalo needs is a realistic sales pitch.
*We kinda suck in the winter but have a great time in the summer
*We may not have a 5star hotel but you are not going to need lube when you get the bill at check out.
*The bars are open late and the drinks are cheap.
*We have plenty of stuff to do and see because it is left over from 50 years ago when Buffalo was a top 10 city
*When you come to Buffalo, you are treated like royalty. Mainly because Buffalo has an inferiority complex. A couple of days in B-lo will do wonders for yours if you have one.
*People in Buffalo are as nice as they come as long as you are not a fan of Miami Football or George Bush
*Did I mention the hotels and bars are cheap
*Sunset on the eastern side of Lake Erie is second to none.
*Buffalo does festivals better than anyone else in the US.
*Buffalo kinda has a downtown casino and one just a drive away in the falls.
*Speaking of the falls, the American view sucks compared to the Canadians side but crossing the boarder is a pain in the ass. Did we mention there is a casino up there as well?
You get the point. Be realistic and it can happen.
Report this
vikings63
I sit back and laugh at all these articles everyday about how to rebuild Buffalo. I laugh because i already told people how to rebuild Buffalo and not only will it be nice but it would stand out not only around the country but around the world. . I know sit and just laugh at all the mistakes that are happening. What people dont realize is Bufflalo is a prime city just waiting to be taken up to that level no other city can match. Well anyway i come on time to time for a good laugh
Report this
sonyactivision
If Buffalo purposefully created an elite, smaller-scaled conference center that utilizes some great period architecture, had a secure and lush setting and lured important events such as Bretton Woods or a G8 summit, (don't laugh, it's all about connecting) that would become the nexus of a conventions and meeting industry that might, emphasis on might, support a mudh larger facility. You need cachet in this business and Buffalo won't get it from its climate, its commercial power, or its fun atmosphere.
Report this