Gimme Some Skin

Gimme Some Skin

Story Options

Who cares if it's cold out? There's work to be done on modernizing the outdated Dulski building. If you're in or around the Johnson Park neighborhood, the work being done is pretty cool to see. There are approximately 525 windows on the north side of the building, and each one is coming down one at a time. I was wondering how they would tackle this job. After one window is lowered to the ground, workers lift the crane back into position towards the top of the building. The looping cable is then secured to the top of the window before workers break out the blowtorches and proceed to disconnect the massive concrete frame. Once the connection is broken, the window twists and hovers for a few seconds before being lowered to the ground. This appears to be a painstaking process, much different than having a go of it with the wrecking ball.

If you're not familiar with the project, then see West Coast Perspective's post here (details following) - looks like the project is ahead of schedule:

Plans for the 15-story structure include 37 condominium units, a 150-room luxury hotel, and over 128,000 square feet of class office space. Asbestos abatement work currently underway is expected to be complete by next March. According to Uniland, the building’s concrete façade will start to come off next spring and its new glass façade should be in place by May. An early 2009 opening is anticipated.

The building’s planned façade has been slightly changed from earlier plans. It will now feature a two-tone blue glass façade, a two-story atrium/lobby, balconies on the residential floors, and a small addition along Huron Street.

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. STEEL

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 13:26

    I remember seeing those panels going up

  2. chris69

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 13:32

    I never thought it looked that bad to be honest....I just wish they built the first 1-2-3 floors out to the sidewalk

  3. chris69

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 13:40

    I will feel alot better when Iskalo Midrise, Court Street Midrise, Seneca Creek Casino Hotel and Issas City Tower go up because this city needs those buildings.

    and lets hope that that building next to Redjacket with the hole in the roof, the Greystone with the hole in the roof and other desperate buildings get their lifeline in 2008

    Liberty, Hyatt and LaFayette should all go residential in the near future....which will open up downtown to new office buildings

  4. galaxyjay

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 13:47

    It will look fantastic once the new glass facade is up and running..

  5. SLEEPL8

    4 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 14:19

    huge waste of time and money

  6. needles

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 14:49

    chris69,

    Don't forget Gates Circle condo tower!

  7. bleedingblue11

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 14:51

    Man, this takes window cleaning to another level.

  8. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 14:52

    Sleep

    Matter of opinion. Since it is not your time or money...why do you care?

  9. urbansoul

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 15:51

    LOLOLOL Going to look GREAT. The new courthouse (glass exterior), New Era and this will change the entire landscape of Delaware. Don't listen to Sleep, he's just one of those on here trying to start a fire. It'll all look phenom...

  10. Joshua

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 16:02

    urban - this is a serious matter.......just kidding. This building, after the face lift is going to look great. Is Buffalo, finally, moving into the 20th century?

  11. Andrzej

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 16:06

    While my money is not going into the project (unless it's subsidized, or I own stock in the company), it seems like a waste of energy and materials to be putting all that work into taking down what looks like it can last for a long time.

  12. Greetingcard

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 16:19

    Sleepl8: have you ever been to another city? all the building look like this now.

  13. SLEEPL8

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 16:20

    RonR...I know my opinion doesnt matter but since this is a forum for expressing our own opinions I figured I would go ahead do that. I want to see developments, or in ths case redevelopments be successfull. I think it will be difficult to get a return on the huge investment on the facelift of this building. I think the exterior could have been left alone and the money would be better spent on the interior space. Sorry if you disagree.

  14. SLEEPL8

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 16:23

    Greetingcard...yes I have been to other cities. I am not against the glass facade on a new build, I just dont think it is necessary in this case. It is overkill in my opinion. I am sure it will look awesome but will the cost be offset by the gain?

  15. bison716

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 17:02

    Great progress! Keep it moving.

  16. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 17:07

    Sleep,

    I did not say your opinion does not matter. I asked why you care. There is a difference. I am pretty sure the return on investment will pay off when the views from the hotel rooms and condos are floor to ceiling windows. I live in a unit that has a 20ft by 14ft wall of glass. It makes my place feel twice the size. It is worth it.

    Andrezj,

    Lots of things last but that does not mean they are functional. Just look at the waterfront!

  17. Texpat10

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 17:39

    Chris69. I wish the city could support all that at once but I don't think it can. For once the slow and steady mantra has worked to the city's favor. Other cities that had large amounts of downtown residential come on line in the past 5-7 years are being really hurt by the housing downturn. Buffalo, at least not the more stable areas, hasn't seen that. Even boomtowns like Miami are seeing it. If Dulski and Statler come on line and are absorbed into the market then if I had my way I'd like to see the endangered buildings go next. Graystone is such a cool building that it is a shame that it may not by financially viable to save it without public money. Of course if a developer with money wants to move forward on this stuff then that is their call. I just worry about the fallout for the market in general.

    I am completely lost on the argument that the money spent on the exterior of this building would have been better spent on the interior. The interior and exterior are both being gutted so what was lost by skinning the building? I liked it for what it was when it was an office building but the glass facade will suit it better for a hotel/condo/office tower.

  18. PDB

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 17:52

    The progress downtown is wonderful, and if half of what is on the table comes to pass we will have made great strides.

    While talking about changing "skin" - the court building to the south of City Hall has to be one of the ugliest buildings in our City. Wonder what it would take to make its look fit into a city with a lot of great architecture?

  19. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 20:04

    For the record, this project works financially for the company because it is largely subsidized by the city and state... If it were completely privately financed it would never work...much the same as all of the Lofts Termini and Burke have done...

  20. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 20:07

    This will be a great MODERN project for the city, well done by Uniland and Acquest

  21. gaustad

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 20:40

    I concur

  22. urbansoul

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 20:44

    I'm sure these two companies did their homework in determining whether or not the facade should be replaced. Micky Mouse isn't running these two companies. Lets leave the decision making to the pros!

  23. Hospitable

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 20:48

    BRO... for the record.. a large percentage of remodels and renovations done in the country are subsidized by state and local governments.... thats what happens when you have asbestos and no will to demolish.. just for the record

  24. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 21:06

    thanks hospitable... I deal with these types of deals on a regular basis and here on the west coast there are very little incentives or grants, it is a free market system, whereas if a building is functionally obsolete it gets razed and rebuilt with a functional replacement

  25. STEEL

    2 ratings12345
    Jan 3rd 2008, 21:31

    Well when you figure the cost of doing business in NYS is so high and out of wack when they do subsidize a project like this they are just bringing it back down to the level of cost the rest of the country enjoys. So in a sense it is not a subsidy at all.

  26. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    3 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 00:23

    then therein lies the problem... Cost of business is waaay to high due to unions and politicians.

  27. kahawa

    1 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 00:56

    I personally witnessed the removal of the first of these ugly concrete panels this morning. Very exciting!

  28. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 01:27

    Sarcastically speaking, I think the best, most distinctive elements of the Dulski should be preserved as a memorial.

  29. ChocolateShake

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 02:52

    This may seem odd but what is being done with the cement window skeletons?

  30. leadi

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 10:25

    ChocShake - good question! Does anyone know? Are they being reused or are the components being recycled somehow?

  31. RonR

    3 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 10:53

    The cement skeletons are being made into an abstract monument on the city campus of UB to provide guidance for the Urban Planning and Architecture program on what not to build. Inside of each window will be pictures of such things as the Skyway, the 33, the 190, and pretty much every public housing project. It really will be quite moving. I know I would want to cry when looking at it.

  32. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 11:28

    RonR...good point. (not the monument thing but the one before) I guess i shouldn't criticize without knowing the exact cost of the facelift and the rental income once the units are leased....and really...my opinion doesn't matter but I am OK with that.

  33. MJWorthington

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 11:29

    I wonder what it would have looked like if a few bands of the existing facade was left an incorporated as "detail"?

    I thought this building would have sat for a while. I'm pleasently surprised to see it moving along so quickly.

  34. leadi

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 12:44

    Maybe within the abstract "monument" at UB they can also include that house with the rotating facade' as well as the ridiculous HealthNow buildilng with the old facade still asttached in front? (sarcasm). The list is endless. Thankfully there are a lot of windows on this building. Yes, I agree "moving" it will be. It will be moving Buffalo in the wrong direction.

    Why would anyone want to construct a "monument" to remember mistakes? Maybe I should construct a monument to the time when I painted my hallway a horrific color just to remind myself how bad it really was? Silly, right? It is tragic to make a public monument to 100 years of bad planning and architectural mistakes in Buffalo.

  35. MJWorthington

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 15:03

    I'm pretty sure he was joking ;)

  36. leadi

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 15:58

    Duh! So sorry!

  37. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 17:45

    The original pre-stressed concrete window panels of the Dulski Federal Office Building will live in our hearts forever.

  38. urbansoul

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 21:15

    Need not criticize any more peeps, copied and pasted from wkbw.com: This will give the building a fresh contemporary look, but it's also a practical change. "The panels are not efficient from an operation standpoint," explains Montante, "There's a lot of heat loss, not much insulation. So the new façade will be much better insulated," says Montante.

  39. Denizen

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 23:20

    The above photos illustrate how versatile street superstructure buildings actually are. The exterior architecture is merely a skin which can be applied then subsequently stripped when the style becomes outdated. Glad to see that the case here, the original exterior is ugly as sin.

  40. Denizen

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 4th 2008, 23:34

    should say "Steel superstructure"....damn non existence of comment editing.

  41. RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Jan 5th 2008, 01:25

    yeah, Denizen, it's always funny when one of those early 20th century masonry "wedding cakes" on Park Avenue gets the radical facadectomy to reveal a perfectly functional Structural Rationalist steel skeleton. You can hang anything off this stuff. Even the new curtainwall will someday come down and who knows? Be replaced by concrete window panels in 2086?

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links