Gates Condo Tower OK'd

Gates Condo Tower OK'd

Story Options

The Buffalo Planning Board this morning approved Uniland Development’s 68-unit condo tower proposal on Gates Circle. But don’t expect construction to start before next summer. Uniland is still completing pre-development work, wants to have sixty percent of the units pre-sold, and could be delayed by threatened lawsuits from neighboring property owners. The Planning Board’s approval was the last City hurdle needed to proceed with construction.

Uniland purchased the prominent Park Lane site on Gates Circle in May 2006 and unveiled the design for the ultra-luxury, 23-story tower one year later. With pricing starting at $450,000 and topping $2 million for penthouse units, the developer is aiming for the small, ultra exclusive market. The project is expected to include a library, community room, wine cellar, multi-media room, and doorman. Units will feature 10-11' ceilings, terraces, floor-to-ceiling glass, contemporary kitchens, walk-in closets, and spa-like bathrooms.

Project Website

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. Spaulding97

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:19

    And we're off... let the lawsuits begin! As I said in a another thread, great day for Buffalo development news. Keep it coming. That's another hurdle, NEXT!

  2. jerkface

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:31

    what about my airflow?

    Seriously, great news!

  3. UnionAMG

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:31

    Is it possible to sue the people who sue Uniland... it sure as hell should be!

    If this thing gets killed by lawsuits I think I might cry.

  4. davvid

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:38
  5. josephr921

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:45

    $450,000?! Wow, there's going to be some upscale folks living in this place.

  6. tr1

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:54

    That will be a big improvement over the dreary Park Lane! If it turns out like the depiction in the article I believe that it will add value to the entire area. Cheer up Park Lane residents, better days are coming.

  7. al-alo

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 15:57

    lets not forget the ivory backscratchers.

  8. SLEEPL8

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 16:08

    Can someone explain to me exactly what grounds would exist upon which neighbors could raise a law suit? If the city approves the project and proceeds obeying all ordinances then what suit could there be? How long could this be held up in court? I hope construction begins next summer. I am excited to see how this turns out.

  9. Urbanica

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 16:13

    YES! Thats all I can say about this news...YES YES YES!!!!

  10. jerkface

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 16:34

    SLEEPL8, I agree that basic logic would lead me to believe that there would be no legal grounds to sue. Or that if there were they would be so insignificant that a lawsuite would be obviously fruitless and a waste of everyone's time and resources. However I think it's the proper course to ignore logic and common sense when discussing development, government agencies, and community curmudgeons. Hopefully whatever useless lawsuites are brought will be dissmissed quickly so that this thing can go up. Can't wait to hear all those construction vehicles and excavators!

  11. BROKEEPSBLOCKINGME

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 17:23

    SNOOOOZE... And yet another round of Obstructionists can make the headlines by filing their bullshit lawsuits and ruining the city's already bad rep even further

  12. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 17:31

    Sleep, Unfortunately for Buffalo and development, there really is not much needed to file a lawsuit. Tim Tielman has shown us this time and time again.

    There is a huge difference between filing a lawsuit and winning a lawsuit. Sadly both options can prevent development.

    There should be a pull on what absurd claim is filed. I think they should claim on the premise the site being historic because Red Jacket's horse took a crap on the site in 1805

  13. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 17:32

    Sleep, Unfortunately for Buffalo and development, there really is not much needed to file a lawsuit. Tim Tielman has shown us this time and time again.

    There is a huge difference between filing a lawsuit and winning a lawsuit. Sadly both options can prevent development.

    There should be a poll on what absurd claim is filed. I think they should claim the site being historic on the premise of Red Jacket's horse took a crap on there in 1805

  14. flyguy

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 18:11

    Just as we see the light at the end of the tunnel and finally see what Buffalo has been missing, progressive large scale development someone turns on the lights and a bunch of lawyers have been hiding in the darkness and are ready to pounce as always. Always has to be that last big push to block anything and everything doesnt there? Good going. And the Buffalo population in 2010 will be???? Blocking new and exciting investment not seen in years is no way to halt the hemmorhage of population and get your population back to fix up the place.

  15. NBJOHN

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 18:42

    Maybe Buffalo really is changing.... Get rid of some of these piss poor politicians and that would be real change.

    great news... wonder what is going to happen when Gate hospital closes?

  16. icecreamsub

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 18:51

    there has to be something wrong with this plan.....c'mon, give me something for me to jump on the obstuctionist bandwagon.

  17. Andrew

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:04

    What a shock. I went to the first planning board meeting and i had serous dbouts about this. But i'm glad this got approved. Another modern development for Buffalo, YAY!

  18. RPreskop

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:12

    The obstructionists who live in that glorified, 10 story slum tenement known as the Parklane Condominiums really have no legal bases to their threatened lawsuit. It is narrow-minded, backward people like the opponents to this outstanding, aesthetically beautiful 23 story proposed condominium tower that are seriously undermining Buffalo's future. These people have no right going to court because it is Uniland's property and the proposed luxury high-rise condo tower is permitted by law. It is well within all zoning and land use regulations. From what I have seen and heard, most city residents support this luxury high-rise project for Gates Circle. Hopefully if these brain-dead, backward opponents do file a lawsuit, it is quickly thrown out of court and Uniland's right to develop its Gates Circle property is upheld. It is not only our piss-poor local politicians that have to be voted out, it is also time to show some of these rich old people either the Airport or the I-90 and tell them to sell their condos, take their old money and pack up and get the hell out of our city and region. Buffalo would be much better off without some of these rich old folks who just want to live in the past. I say fuck the past and bring on the future.

  19. Adam726

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:40

    Hey maybe there won't be any lawsuits and the shovel is in the ground in less than a year. Stay positive!!!!

  20. pgf1948

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:44

    Really intelligent remarks.

  21. Hoss

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:48

    Excellent News!!! It's gonna be a lot harder to get a table at Hutch's.

  22. hamp

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 19:59

    I think this is a great design. But I find the comments leveled at the abutters to be ignorant and not worthy of Buffalo Rising. Last time I checked we were still living in a democracy, where everyone has the right to express themself. Is it at all possible that there is another point of view besides your own? The name calling doesn't help your cause. If your'e so concerned about the city's reputation in other parts, you might want to refrain from the bush league comments.

  23. Auburner

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:06

    Looks lice a nice building to me but could someone explain to me one question? If Millard Filmore is closing and is quite unsightly, why can they not put this building there? It appears that with the Hospital closings this would be a great place to put the building... I would appease everyone from the Park Lane as it would increase property values without obstructing their view...

  24. 42nate

    5 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:08

    I just love how Tim Tielman's name turns up again and again on BRO as this big boogeyman. Hey, everyone! TImTielmanTimTielmanTimTielman! BOO!

    It's hysterical to watch people reassure themselves and each other against his supernatural powers by rattling sabres in his direction. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Buffalo is the cool city you all love because Tielman & Co. fought a lot of battles against pointless demolitions and damaging "development" before half of you knew how to read. We'd have a whole lot more "What were they thinking?" urban blunders on our list if it wasn't for Tim.

  25. TownLine

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:20

    Hey Preskop, weren't you the same miserable poster who stated that theres not enough money in this city to support the inner harbor development featured yesterday? But you're all about a 23 story tower that sells for upwards of 2million each?

    Or is it that you just enjoy complaining on every story you get the chance. Even here, you took your idea of support for the tower and turned it into a giant complaint. Some people just love misery.

    Great news on the approval!

  26. chris69

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:22

    this neighborhood couldht handle losing the Gates Tower and Millard Fillmore Hospital. It would have devastated gates circle inviting the poverty between Main and Linwood right uptp the Park Lane Apartments, as well as, turning developers off to this area.

    Now with Gates Tower getting the go ahead....there is hope for Millard Fillmore Hospital to be redeveloped.

  27. Auburner

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:31

    Chris, You and I have had our disagreements over time and I certainly respect your opinion but I must say, the lot behind MF Hospital could be a great pace for this building or rip down that sandstone structure. I think it may make everyone happy, compromise. If the Linwood crowd that is so feared shows up, so be it, city living right?

  28. Auburner

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 20:31

    Chris, You and I have had our disagreements over time and I certainly respect your opinion but I must say, the lot behind MF Hospital could be a great pace for this building or rip down that sandstone structure. I think it may make everyone happy, compromise. If the Linwood crowd that is so feared shows up, so be it, city living right?

  29. SkaJack

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 21:08

    I'm OK with the development. But left out of the discussion is WHY this had to happen.

    The Park Lane Restaurant is a Buffalo tradition that might have thrived under different management.

    It seems unfortunate that a first time restaurant owner got his hands on a Buffalo legacy, made questionable choices, like destroying one of the best bars in the city and got side tracked by a caterering adventure. Then bailed out.

    There was still a pulse before they pulled the plug. And we all lost a piece of history.

  30. ntdrew

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 21:28

    Nice, keep 'em comming!

  31. Hospitable

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 21:31

    Aurburner.... wasn't the gates circle project announced, purchsed, and planned for (somewhat) before the hospital commision announced they wanted to close mf gates circle.

    2nd. thing. skaJack... it wouldn't call the Park Lane History...it could have done better under new management but it could have done much worse. 95% of restaurants fail in their first year and that other 5% don't have a life that lasts for ever. Besdies, the building was in my opinion ugly and the owners created that historical atmosphere. ( Lots of imports, stair case from London etc). Not anytthing that could be done further down the road.

    Crappy little hermit hut or 20 story 21st century tower..... get over it bud.

  32. chrish

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 21:31

    For the record, Tim Tielman has said a tall condo building, per se, presents no preservation concerns, and he is correct in that assessment.

  33. MiesvanderDoh

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 22:21

    I'm not so sure this will work in Buffalo right now, but hey. go for it as long as you don't want public money. however I do think there are better locations that could be chosen.

  34. PrincetonElms

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 22:28

    Messkop calls the old ParkLane condos a "slum tenement" . Ever been inside? I have. Beautiful, luxurious, and built like a fortress. Idiot.

  35. gaustad

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 11th 2007, 23:02

    TWO QUESTIONS:

    1.) How can the regions largest developer be bullied by a few old crotches? They should have enough money and clout to blow through this project.

    2.) There are plenty of alternatives in Buffalo to build this project that are just as good if not better. Why is Uniulans so stuck on this site? The tower would probably be successful just about anywhere, especially if it had views of the lake or river....

  36. dougk

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 00:07

    bringing my downpayment to parklane next week, who's the broker, i buy off plan

  37. platt4

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 00:08

    Gaustad- maybe because that is the property that was for sale at the time at a price Uniland was willing to pay? Come on now. Location-location-location. Get with it.

  38. chris69

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 01:09

    Auburner, you wont get any dispute from me. There are plenty of locations where this tower would be successful but I dont think this is going to be the last tower in the neighborhood or in Buffalo.

    I can see another waterfront tower being proposed

    I can see a tower in the cobblestone district.

    and I can see another tower somewhere around Delaware Park.....either Main, Delevan or Elmwood area.

    I also expect to hear residential conversion possibly at the Lafayette, Liberty and a few other places.

  39. OutSideLookingIn

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 01:22

    AWESOME NEWS!!! LET'S GO!

  40. Denizen

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 01:40

    This will get built. Y'all are getting way too overdramatic about what the "opposition" might or might not do.

  41. gaustad

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 02:00

    platt4 - I find it hard to belive that it was easier to buy the park lane and spend money demolishing it rather pick one of the several vacant parking lots spread throughout the city and build. The location looking out over the east side and olmstead is nice, but lets not get carried away. .

  42. rickyrick

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 03:26

    Great to see something NEW and TALL going up for a change.

  43. urbansoul

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 07:59

    Great Great Great news! I hope to see a construction crane in the Spring. Way to go, planning board! It's about time we move Buffalo forward rather than backwards.

  44. halljd39

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 08:59

    $450,000 - $2M - Is "NEW" money coming back into Buffalo, finally?

  45. Dan

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 09:14

    Okay, I'll get it out of the way.

    * OMG who can afford to live there?

    * Why build new housing when there's thousands of vacant units throughout the city?

    * The influx of yuppies will hurt the authenticity and character of the area. I don't want to see more foo-foo boutiques catering to the wealthy. We need more businesses that are real and authentic, like Boosing TV.

    * They should build it on the East Side, where it's really needed.

    /sarcasm

  46. bbvdm

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 09:35

    1. Assuming MF Hospital stays for a while anyway...does anyone live/work near this area? Has anyone heard all the sirens? Very obnoxious.

    2. 42Nate: Tim Tielman. Yes his name does come up quite often and for good reasons. Maybe not for this project, but certainly for others. The latest? He wants to keep the Aud????? And for what?? Because it is a monument to our soldiers who have died in war. I'm sorry...it is an embarrassment to our war dead. Get real and please just find something useful to protest!

  47. mattb

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 10:40

    There are judges and several prominent attorneys that live in the Park Lane Towers. However groundless their claims might be, the neighbors fighting this development will be well represented. These aren't obstructionist unemployed hippies people...they are prominent members of Buffalo's legal community. I hope they lose.

  48. Martin

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 10:42

    I have to say this, I went on Tim Tiemans "Topless" bus ride. The guy gave me a headach with all the hot air he was spewing. He so so far left wing. For all the good he has done he has offset it with all the setbacks he creates. I found him to be a moron.

  49. cdubmoo

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 10:46

    Much to the chagrin of Park Lane residents, this tower will help begin to bring some prosperity to Buffalo. I say build it and do so quickly... unless you want to continue living in a stagnant city.

  50. UnionAMG

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 10:51

    I don't understand what people living near there would have to complain about.

    Don't you think 450k-2M dollar condo's coming in next door would actually improve your property values? Perhaps losing a little sunlight might hurt that, but I'd have to think the very nice places coming in next door would overcome that loss. Maybe I'm missing something

  51. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 12:19

    Here are the reasons I think residents in the Park Lane do not want this tower.

    - Right now they are the only game in town being a mid rise condo tower. Because of this people overlook things like no A/C and lead paint. With the new tower, there will be options. The Park Lane is a glorious tower in some areas but in the actual units, they are showing age.

    - A lot of residents will loose their view. People who live in mid to high rise condos pay for the view. The units that today have a wonderful view of Gates circle at their feet and Forest Lawn and Delaware Park in the distance are going to be looking at this tower.

    - But for some reason, I think the crusty's in the building are most upset about loosing the claim to being on Gates Circle. The actual address for Park Lane is 771 Lafayette Avenue, but when you look up the Park Lane they always claim to be located at 33 Gates Circle. I think more then anything, this is about loosing their seat on the circle to a new tower.

  52. Spaulding97

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 12:57

    How many people from the Park lane can be screwed by loosing the view? 5-10 people? I don't exactly, but I'm sure we can count them on our fingers and toes. So that hand full of people are gonna stand in the way of the rest of WNYs population and the waiting developers in line? No way. Sure they have some pull, but they can only pull so far. There is no legal grounds for a lawsuit there. If there was, NYC, Chicago, Miami etc wouldn't be what it is today. Hopefully, who ever makes the decision of throwing out the lawsuits opens their eyes.

  53. hamp

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 13:24

    Anyone that has spent one minute with Tim Tielman can tell he is no "moron". I dare say he has done more positive things for the city than all the posters on this thread, combined.

  54. coolrobc

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 13:50

    hamp- While what you say may be true, his obstructionist use of the legal system is reprehensible IMO, and is one of the reasons he is disliked by many.

  55. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 13:55

    Spaulding,

    I think it will be close to 20% of the units that will be effected in regards to the view issue. But I agree with you 100% that the loss of a view for 20 units is not worth the loss of this project for the whole city.

    I doubt any lawsuit will gain traction.

  56. hamp

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 14:29

    Not to drag this way off topic. But will someone please give me an example of something that Tim Tielman stopped, that didn't eventually lead to a better project?

  57. coolrobc

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:12

    Hamp - Better in his eye's and maybe a some others, but that's a very subjective question.

    I'm not saying he's the root of all evil and obstruction in WNY. I'm also not saying that he hasn't done any good. I'm not referring to anything in particular that he's stopped, he hasn't one every lawsuit he's filed has he?

    For many(at least many that I know) his name is synonymous with obstructionist lawsuits. The problem I see is that these types of lawsuits unnecessarily drive up the cost of development in the city.

  58. coolrobc

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:18

    wow, holy wrong word batman, should read "hasn't won every lawsuit he's filed, has he"

    yikes.

  59. hamp

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:29

    I'll repeat my question. Will someone please give me an example of something that Tim Tielman stopped, that didn't eventually lead to a better project? You can be as subjective as you want. Just give me an example.

  60. hodgepodge

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:34

    considering it's pretty cloudly here 9 months a year, who gives a toss about views? by the by; the park lane's view of delaware park won't be blocked by this structure; just the east side views. anyway, everyone take a breath. the fabulous judges in this town always get it right and would never stop this thing based on something so silly as who lives in the park lane. right?

  61. doc

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:43

    considering the weather we've had this year (beating out Orlando for the most sunny days by a mile) I don't know what prompted your post on the cloudy weather for 9 months of the year, hodgepodge. Couldn't you think of something negative that was more relevant like bashing Tielman or something? I mean there's a pending lawsuit out there dude! Have at it! But not the weather...especially not this year. Besides I'm buying one of the penthouses.

  62. coolrobc

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 15:49

    OK hamp, BassPro on the waterfront. ;)

  63. tudorguy

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 18:08

    bbvdm - to answer your question: I live in the area (tudor area obviously) and I agree - the sirens are CONSTANT and ANNOYING. Rural/Metro should get fined for all the noise pollution (they're only supposed to use them in life/death situations, NOT because they think they're cool).

  64. gaustad

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 18:29

    da I like Buffalo Your my Bestfriend-Your my Bestfriend-Your my Bestfriend-Your my Bestfriend-

  65. RPreskop

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 18:53

    Hey TownLine, For your information I am not a miserable poster and I did not turn my comment about the proposed Gates Circle condominium tower into a complaint. You obviously do not know what the hell you are talking about. I am 100% for this luxury high-rise development because it will be a major aesthetic improvement over that suburban style, shitty looking Park Lane Restaurant that now detracts from that prominent site. It will also attract high income professional people to live in the city which will help create more critical mass for nearby business areas, ex: Elmwood. My only concern was some of those miserable, narrow-minded opponents who are threatening to stop this high quality project from being implemented because it does not meet their petty, rinky-dink standards and I am just fed up with some of these NIMBYs and their endless protesting and crying and clogging up the court system with their childish, baseless lawsuits. I would much rather see major new investment go into existing neighborhoods- rich, middle class, and poor rather than waste time and our tax money and our energy on the damn waterfront. Lets take care of our existing neighborhoods first and worry about the waterfront later because it has been nothing but failures and delays with the waterfront. I have lost interest in the waterfront because of all the aborted plans and studies done on it. The waterfront is a hopeless case. It is both the neighborhoods and downtown that have the most potential and promise.

  66. hamp

    4 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 21:12

    The vast majority of citizens agree with Tielman, that Bass Pro doesn't belong on the Central Wharf, and that the city is much better off putting it somewhere else. I don't see this as obstruction. There would be no Central Wharf if not for Tielman.

  67. AtwaterLouse

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 21:50

    hamp - can you provide a reference to any objective evidence of your claim regarding what the "vast majority" agrees on, such as a public opinion poll or a referendum? Or is your claim just a fake fact that somebody made up?

    The vast majority of citizens agree with Tielman, that Bass Pro doesn't belong on the Central Wharf

    Personally, I'd be surprised if a "vast majority" in the city supported spending all those millions on ivory tower plans for cobblestone sidewalks and more money-sucking public greenspace while we still can't afford to fix LaSalle Pool and MLK sprinkers.

    But I'll just express that as an opinionated guess, rather than simply claiming I speak for the "vast majority".

  68. hamp

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 22:40

    On August 17, 2007 Donn Esmonde wrote about 12 representatives of various WNY organizations ranging from "Buffalo Place" to the League of Women Voters that vehemently opposed Bass Pro at the Central Wharf. Here's part of the artlcle, from the News' website:

    "There were a dozen of them, standing near the best example of the power of people to shape their community. They gathered at the Erie Canal Harbor on a drizzly Tuesday, with the governor in town, to send the man a message: We are a dozen, but we stand for thousands -- most of whom do not call themselves preservationists. They stand against the hijacking of a public process by a newfound state agency. "

  69. Keith

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 12th 2007, 23:10

    Hey anybody hear about what the Mr. Fox Tire Co is doing?

    http://www.moderntiredealer.com/t_inside.cfm?action=news_det&storyID=7873

    Pretty cool if it is true.

  70. WCPerspective

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 00:16

    Why yes Keith- see:

    http://buffalorising.com/story/fox_tire_planning_green_roof_a

    and

    http://buffalorising.com/story/greening_the_east_side

  71. RisingDamp666

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 01:20

    It could have been worse, folks....ever heard of the Transamerica Pyramid?

  72. urbansoul

    3 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 07:00

    Tielman = moron

  73. coolrobc

    2 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 10:43

    Hamp, Donn Esmonde? Please... that's like expecting to hear something objective about Larry Quinn and the Sabres management from Bucky Gleason. How can you say it's not obstruction, that means to stop or impede something? He wasn't trying to stop or impede Bass Pro from being built on the waterfront?

    And while they may have had a dozen people, representing thousands, last I checked there are a few hundred thousand people in the area. The"vast majority" of people I know were in favor of the change to the project. There just happened to be a vocal minority speaking against it.

    It's also not surprising the Buffalo Place would be against something that may draw people away from their core business district.

    I don't have a problem with Tielman or other preservationists expressing their opinions on these issues, or even protesting, petitioning, etc. I have a problem with the way he and others like him use the legal system, and drive up the cost of doing business to further their own agenda.

  74. AtwaterLouse

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 12:41

    hamp - Are you seriously saying a dozen people implies any factual basis for a claim that a "vast majority of citizens" believe something (in a metro area over 900,000)? You're of course entilted to your opinion about the Central Warf issue, but making that silly a claim and trying to pass it off as fact does not help your cause in the least.

  75. rickyrick

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 13:35

    Buffalo Place never does it's job. Does not promote retail, allows first floors to be left blank, boarded up and offices such as a parole office to open up in an already high bum location....So I can care less what Buffalo Place has to say about anything.

  76. hamp

    1 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 14:22

    Let's move on folks.

  77. Auburner

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 13th 2007, 20:19

    You know... I have been thinking about this whole project that this subject is about. About 60 years ago, I wonder what the people of Chapin Pkwy or Laffayette Ave thought about the Park Lane being constructed? I can not imagine it went over well... But they adjusted and things went on...

    Chris, thank you for your kind words and all I can say is across the street may have been a better idea (I understand that it was purchased prior to the hospital closings) but there is a lot of vacant land there, as I recall... Too bad, it would have been a great compromise.

    One question I do have, however; How do you think this influx of taxes will play on improving the D District schools and the east side schools? That is if anyone buys at those prices, mortgage companies are not lending money like they were when this was first planned...

  78. Olcott_Beach

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 14th 2007, 12:46

    Where is Tim Tielman? I am surprised he hasn't pulled his head out of his ass and started screaming!

    Seriously, this is good news and when Gates Circle Hospital shuts down the building may be eyed for re-developement, assuming it has not been already.

  79. Vylit

    0 ratings12345
    Sep 16th 2007, 14:05

    At the end of the day, the compromise that results from the struggle between new development and those that want to preserve the City's history is the best result for the community. Regardless of where on this continuum your personal views lie, Buffalonians are passionate about their area. These opposing camps ultimately self-police to avoid the unnecessary losses that would result if either gained the unfettered abilitiy to make decisions. It is ultimately a system of checks and balances that is apparently working as Buffalo Rises from the dust of a rust-belt upstate New York city. At the risk of waxing philosophical, we are witnessing the democractic process in its purest form. The judicial system is there to be used; to resolve disputes. A losing litigant hasn't always been guilty of filing a frivolous lawsuit. The agreements that are made as a result and the fact that the community has been awakened to some of the other considerations involved are of great importance. There will always be some that abuse the system but mere use of the system shouldn't be frowned upon.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?