Cyclists are not welcome on Main Street

Cyclists are not welcome on Main Street

Story Options

It's kid of unfortunate that with the growing popularity of biking, someone forgot to add bike lanes to the Main Street traffic improvement program. Once again, one of the city's best cross town navigation routes will be dedicated solely to the automobile. The street could have been redesigned to be an excellent commuter road for cycling students. Don't forget that it's illegal to ride a bike on the sidewalk. To have no bike lanes in a district that is home to thousands of University at Buffalo and Canisius students? Wasn't there any anticipation that the Complete Streets Initiative was being passed? And after the initiative was passed, streetscape designers should have re-examined the fact that Main Street construction is moving forward with no attention to bike lanes or shared bike/road sharrows. (photo: Main and Hertel)

In many progressive cities, cyclists are not considered broke-ass hippies and/or moving targets for auto drivers. Bike-friendly culture is considered a sign of a progressive city. College students ride bikes. Healthy people ride bikes. People who care about the environment ride bikes. In recent months I've heard people refer to Buffalo Rising Online as Bicycle Riders Online... I take that as a compliment, because I believe that Buffalo has got to wake up when it comes to promoting alternative forms of transportation. In a recent NY Magazine article, writer Adam Sternbergh wrote this:

"When I interviewed Buffalo’s mayor, Byron Brown, he quoted directly from the Florida (Richard) playbook. The city (Buffalo) is striving to be more bike friendly."

Obviously there are more and more urban cyclists who are happy to hear that we're getting bike racks from The City. But if we're still designing streets with no bike lanes, then where are people going to ride? Biking is not just a recreation. It is a form of transportation. When I stopped into Founding Fathers on the night of the election, I was elated to see the number of young people who rode their bikes to the pub (photo). There must have been forty bikes locked to the nearby fence. And every street sign within two blocks was being used as a bike locking mechanism. It should say something that this young generation of voters were all there to watch the results of an election that they had just voted in. These cyclists are not just speaking with their votes, they are also speaking with their wallets. Just walk into any bike shop in the area and ask the owner how sales have been. While the auto industry is taking a hit on the chin, bike sales have skyrocketed.

If a large population of cyclists is hitting the streets, don't you think the streets should be safe for them? What is more important... a median (filled with dead plants) on Main Street or bike lanes? Why is it so difficult to add a feature that benefits so many people? You want an overweight population? You want more parking lots? You want more auto emissions? Then keep building roads without bike lanes. You want to talk about quality of life issues? Then skip the median and start to promote bike culture in the city of Buffalo.

Rock Harbor

What Others Have To Say

  1. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 16:58

    Part (not all) of the problem is the DOT and DPW's feeling that you MUST have a bike lane in both directions. IF you can't fit two... then you build none. This often means that roads like Main Street will receive none. They did increase the width of the sidewalks along main and narrow the travel lanes... which is good for the urbanity of street and I feel will help a lot in strengthening the commercial district but bikes were an after thought.

    I would like to see bike lanes taken off the street and put above the curb as a single route for both directions. This is done all across Europe and is a very effective way to fit bike lanes into narrow streets.

    Brown and the admin is all talk about the environment, biking and sustainability. Making effective change for any of those goals would mean that a change in the way we do things in Buffalo would have to happen. A change in the way the DPW thinks, a change in the way employees commute, a change in the mentality that Buffalo is nothing but a car centric city. A change in the way we do business and the way businesses in Buffalo do business. He doesn't have the courage to stand up against the people who don't want change.

  2. Kernwatch6

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 18:13

    Thanks to Justin Booth & BfloRising biking in Bflo has come far since the days when I was one of few biking downtown.

    It may be time to consider an option for bikers I recently learned about in Mpls, proud to call itself "Second Most Bike Freindly US City (after Portland).

    After sometimes guiltily riding short distance on sidewalks in heavy traffic areas, I recently learned that biking is permitted here on sidewalks, except in commercial areas, with courtesy to pedestrians a given, of course.

    That change in law in Bflo might reduce safety issues for bikers in some areas on Main Street, while pressuring the city to better consider their needs & rights.

    Bike racks on buses continue to be a need in Bflo. In Mpls EVERY bus has a bike rack. And I have rejoiced about their ready availablity twice when unprepared for flats on long rides! More times, if bad weather is factored in . .

    Dick Kern

  3. whynot

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 19:25

    If you get a large enough group of those young cyclists together, then you might stand a chance of seeing more progressive and appropriate street designs. Until then, bikes will still be relegated to the sidewalks and bike trails. You've got to consider the age and background of the people who are planning and running these projects, and the same for the people who are approving them for the city. If you want to see change, then you have to show that enough people care about it to ensure that it happens. I don't see this issue being represented by a large enough group of voters to really make a difference, not when there are other issues to respond to first.

    I am not saying that it isn't important or possible, we just need to see this interest group get organized enough to lobby the local government for change. Maybe then we will see something happen.

  4. lizzyb

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 21:04

    My friends cycle to work as often as possible. They contacted Mayor Browns office a year and a half ago about just this issue. Safe lanes. Not here in Buffalo. Thanks for bringing this issue to the surface again. Shameful how the administration is only listening when they run for office eh.

    Hope our President Elect doesn't come a knockin' for his honor. What a dis appointment that would be for the nation. Bicycles, scooters..no respect. Hummers and Harley's dentists and lawyers are the pets of our city. PS I was wondering if Parking Enforcement ever cites parking enfractions on the East Side. They sure are busy on the North End. Wow I feel better now that I've gotten all off my mind. Whew!

  5. jamesbflo

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 21:25

    ''I would like to see bike lanes taken off the street and put above the curb as a single route for both directions. This is done all across Europe and is a very effective way to fit bike lanes into narrow streets. ''

    do you mean a bicycle lane on the sidewalk? this would be ideal. I don't know about everyone else, but i'm scared as hell to ride in the street. If that means i'm breaking a law or making people mad by being on the sidewalk - so be it.

  6. Hoss

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 21:34

    This really upsets me. I have written LoCurto as well as Mayor Brown about this several times over the past two years. LoCurto got the 'Complete Streets' proposal up there, but sadly, it seems to be an empty initiative. I was really hoping that the day our 'leaders' biked to work they would have seen the need for bike lanes on this major arterial. Oh well...

    Main street between Hertel and Amherst seems even more narrow than before they started this segment of reconstruction. I really hope nobody gets hurt trying to navigate this gauntlet in the coming years.

    It's really, really shortsighted. Main Street is the primary arterial that has the potential to bring not only thousands of college students into downtown, but also the thousands of folks who can't afford a car to begin with, yet need to get to jobs. Main Street is a major dividing line of our city. It's a primary gateway into our metropolis. If there is one single street in this city that should be implementing the 'Complete Streets' initiative, this is the one.

    I've been hearing that DOT two lane argument for the last two years on this site. It's total bunk. Anybody been to NYC lately? They have bike lanes popping up in every borough, and they aren't all 4 feet wide in both directions.

    I like sbrof's idea. The sidewalks are oversized and underused through these sections anyways.

  7. Bufago

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 21:48

    They can ride the wrong way on the side walks like most of the bike idiots do and then blow thru the red lights.

  8. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 9th 2008, 22:52

    I can't consider it an empty initiative since this project was planned and funded long before any complete street legislation was passed.. so it probably suffers from timing. An narrowing the street will make life much easier and understandable for everyone using the road.

    Anyone remember the old Main Street. No one knew where the lanes were, where to turn or how fast to go or not go. The intersection of Kenmore and Main street was a total mess... College students routinely risked their lives. Now at least they have proper crosswalks and lights that work. And most drivers at least know to look out for them now.

    yeah often bike lanes are raised out of the curbed area into separate stripped pathways either adjacent too or on the other side of the planting strip from the sidewalk in Europe.

  9. Hoss

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 07:50

    I really hope they do a better job plowing the shoulders this winter. Icy shoulders raise the potential for injury exponentially. That's something that could be done w/o any DOT approval.

  10. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 09:22

    I brought up the issue about bike lanes, specifically mentioning the University Heights Main St. project to Tim Wanamaker several years ago when this project was first beginning construction. I asked him why bicycle lanes were not a priority in major city roadway projects. His basic response was that Buffalo doesn't have traffic problems (citing D.C., where he came from and traffic is awful) to warrant investing in alternative forms of transportation. He, pretty clearly, had no interest in investing in bikeways or lanes. Its a really sad mentality. Besides, if we did have traffic problems, I really doubt bicycles would be seen as a major solution. The motives for investing in bike infrastructure should be more of an investment in lifestyle, health and environmentally friendliness. Tim is a smart guy, and I know his focus is Economic Development, but I'm not all that upset he's gone.

  11. peripatetic

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 09:27

    Bike lanes were not forgotten. The community pushed very hard for bike lanes and what are called complete streets. The City would not listen. They tried every excuse imaginable why it wouldn't work. When they were proven wrong they just ignored the community and did what they wanted.

    They made crosswalks too small. did not put in irrigation lines for medians even though a new main water line was installed. They have no plan for tree maintenance. A vounteer has been maintaining the trees. The City allowed some businesses to not have the planned trees planted in front of their businesses. Looks great!!.

    Kenmore Main intersection is worse than before. Main street is a nightmare for pedestrians.

    For 5 years the City has been sitting on $1.2 million for a bikeway from LaSalle Station to Kernmore Ave and Starin Ave.

  12. atypical

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 12:35

    I have no problems with providing space on roads for bike riders - but if the city is going to allow space - bikers should be forced to have insurance.

    A couple weeks ago - a grad student damaged my sideview mirror. Although the fella shared his contact information (name and number) - he could only afford to pay 1/2 of the $600 bill. Guess who paid the rest?

    If I had hit that guy on his bike and damaged it - I would have gotten points, my insurance would go up, and I probably would have had to replace his bike.

    Bottom line: If bikes want road access - which is fine with me - they must be forced to carry insurance as well.

  13. TownLine

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 16:17

    atypical - I get the idea, and there might be something to it. But what about the 12 year old who also rides bikes? Do they need insurance, or are minors banned from riding in traffic till they're 18?

  14. atypical

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 17:50

    I called the insurance company and they told me they would go after the grad student's home owners insurance. Since the grad student doesn't own a home and is over 18 - I was SOL.

    Regarding minors, I would assume they would be covered by their parents or home owners insurance as well.

    Bikes can cause damage to other vehicles, other bikers or people within crosswalks - you see it every day in cities ike Boston and NY - and they should be forced to carry some type of insurance.

    Accidents happen.

  15. bfotk

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 18:30

    I've biked to and from work for years. The bike is my vehicle of choice for most of my (local) transportation needs.

    In my view, and that of many if not most other vehicular cyclists, bike lanes aren't an unmitigated blessing. The skills required for biking in a dedicated lane are no less than those required for biking in the driving lanes with other vehicles. In many cases, the skills required are more daunting. An obvious example is that of wanting to make a left turn from a lane that's off to the right of the rest of traffic. The cyclist must merge into the main lane, cross it, and get into the left turn position. That's a nasty maneuver for anyone, not only the inexperienced cyclists that the bike lanes are supposed to help.

    In Buffalo, there are many examples of right turn dangers in bike lanes. Those happen where the bike lane is to the right of a dedicated right-turn-only-lane for motor vehicles. Yes, those are examples of improper lane design and not directly an argument against the lanes themselves. But they exist and they are problems.

    Bike lanes tend to accumulate debris. The passing cars move junk off the driving lanes and into the bike lanes. Glass, cans, and other junk can pose a danger to cyclists or at least an inconvenience. The NYS law that stupidly requires that cyclists use bike lanes when such are provided, does offer an escape clause stating that the rule need not be followed if the lane is dangerous or impassible. I have to assume that this proviso implies that the cyclist is the one who gets to decide, but that's not explicitly stated.

    No statistics that I've been able to find suggest that there's any safety advantage to bike lanes. I have seen some studies that found that when such lanes are present, motor vehicle drivers tend to pass cyclists more closely and at higher speeds. That's troublesome.

    Finally, the bike lane syndrome tends to support the feelings of many motor vehicle drivers that bikes don't belong on the streets. That leads to unfortunate behavior on the part of many motorists.

  16. blackrocklifer

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 18:54

    I rode to work downtown for many years and found the side streets were the safest way to go. West ave downtown and Prospect to Plymouth to Dewitt home. Richmond (before the bike lane) was fair but the circles can be tough. ELMWOOD should be avoided unless you are willing to slow down to a walk. Only show offs and fools fly down Elmwood.

  17. Charger

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 20:19

    I've ridden extensively in Manhattan and the rest of NYC, and in Buffalo, and I have to agree with bfotk - bike lanes are by no means the end all and be all for cyclists. The most important thing is to follow the rules of the road, be aware of your surroundings, and be appropriately assertive. The only street I've found in Buffalo that I really avoid at all costs is Delaware Avenue between North and Gates Circle, but I actually enjoy riding on Elmwood precisely because it is relatively narrow and that forces cars to travel at a rational speed.

    It's clear from the resurgent cycling culture in Buffalo that sharing the road can be done, and since "rush hour" is so short and localized it's easy enough to find safe routes without relying on the existing lanes.

    That said, a major arterial route like Main Street should certainly be made as bike friendly - including bike lanes and conveniently located bike racks - as engineeringly possible. And driver and cyclist education should be an ongoing effort for the Buffalo Police Department.

    As far as riding on the sidewalk, I really urge those of you who do this to hit the streets. It's definitely safer for pedestrians and it's probably safer for you. One of the keys to riding safely is riding predictably. Drivers are expecting sidewalk traffic to move at walking speed, so if you come whipping along into an intersection or driveway you're going into harm's way.

  18. crisa

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 20:22

    It already is the law that any sort of bicycle or motorbike in the streets must be licensed. I don't see that enforced.

    And, what sort of responsibiligy DO bicyclists on public streets have as far as their liability and responsibility in an accident?

  19. crisa

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 10th 2008, 20:48

    By liability and responsibility, I mean ACTUAL insurance coverage.

    Our dropping economic level alone already dictates that there will be more and more ADULTS on two-wheel bikes like those in the above picture on the streets. Its time not only to enfore the law of licensing but it is also time for bicyclists to be legally required to be insured just the same as the other vehicles that use the streets.

    As far as students 18 or older who are still dependents of their parents while attending college, a clause in their parents' VEHICLE coverage, not homeowner's, would accomplish the needed liability coverage.

    When a CHILD is on a bike in the street, doesn't responsibility ALWAYS fall on the adult MOTORIST who should have been watching for the child? That should not be true for all the ADULT bike riders too, but it sounds as if it is!

  20. bsnack

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 11:09

    Indeed Crisa, if people are riding bikes, it must be because they aint got the cash cash money to be ridin' round in one a dem automobiles.

  21. Hoss

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 11:26

    crisa said "It already is the law that any sort of bicycle or motorbike in the streets must be licensed. I don't see that enforced."

    Where on earth did you get this idea from.? Absolutely not true. Sure, motorcycles need to be registered. But bicycles? Come on?

  22. ecogeo

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 11:28

    I agree wholeheartedly with Charger, and I would like to re-iterate his/her call for all bike riders to get into the street. I ride Main Street between Hertel and UB almost every day. This section of street is also safer during the morning and evening rush because of the lower speeds. About once a week I encounter an unsafe car driver. This is usually someone racing me to a corner to make a right turn in front of me or someone intentionally squeezing me to the curb or parked cars. These situations are relatively safe because the car sees me and I see the car. I think that I see an equal number of unsafe bike riders that use the sidewalk and cross streets at high speeds or that use the sidewalk selectively and erratically. I do think we Buffalo is improving in both regards. It has been a beautiful Fall for bike commuting.

  23. WholeLottaJibbaJabbah

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 14:56

    Holy Crap, Insurance for Bicycles.... I love how every pro-bikes post becomes an anti bike thread. We just want some damn lanes people! Next your going to tell me I need Walking Insurance.

  24. FredOak

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 15:39

    For those interested here is the NYS DOT laws regarding bicycles...http://www.bikeleague.org/action/bikelaws/ny.php

    As a commuter (I travel from Tonawanda to Exchange Street most work days) I find the need for bike lanes not as important as the eduction of drivers AND bike riders that would work towards a safer ride for both.

    I'll admit the bike lane through the Delaware "S" curve is helpful, but not necessarily safer as evident by the before mentioned debris that collects and "right hooks" I have to avoid from motorists that just have to get on the 198 before I'm completely through the ramp entrance and the idiot cyclists traveling in the lane going the wrong way.

  25. ablejack

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 11th 2008, 19:50

    ...love the photo taken outside of Founding Fathers the night America won the election!

  26. peripatetic

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 13th 2008, 16:30

    While driving home last night I passed bicyclist headin north between Amherst street and Hertel. A median has been added. But the travel lanes are too narrow to be safe for bicycles.There is no longer parking on east side of Main. Dangerous situation.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links