Creating Green Jobs Part 4

Creating Green Jobs Part 4

Story Options

Think Financial Student Loans

Sustainable Education: It isn’t Just the District Anymore

This is not an attack on the Buffalo Public School District. I know, first hand, that there are many wonderful and dedicated individuals in the District. Buffalo is certainly no worse than any other major inner city school district and it does have higher graduation rates than the Rochester City School District according to Public School Review. Like all other unions, those in the school district are going to have to make the changes to being community-focused to have relevance in the 21st Century. But the District is only one part of sustainable education and compare to reading, writing and math, its contribution is a small one.

Sustainable education is much more fundamental than the district involved because sustainable education goes beyond K-12 in both directions; it needs to be a community wide effort. In part 3 of this series, Working Green, the role of the unions in advocating for the community was put forward. It is only through continuing education that the union members could be able advocate for newer greener processes and materials which have less impact on the community. Management is not going to advocate any more frequent capital investment than absolutely necessary; that reduces profits, and while green business owners are not just in it for the profit, the profit motive is still there. But an informed union membership could be an effective force in upgrading to the new process.

Likewise, Green Business owners have and education role too. Theirs is to educate the consumers. Studies show that people are willing to pay more for green products. The more confident they are in the product, the more likely they are willing to spend extra money to buy it. This means there is a need for effective consumer education programs either by the business itself or by a coalition of Green Businesses.

The District, like any large institutions, could have a major role in the development of Green Jobs without changing anything happening in the classroom. In Kentucky, the Louisville school district, the University of Louisville and the City of Louisville formed The Partnership for a Green City. Together, the three institutions employ over 25,000 persons, manage over 25,000 acres of land, maintain 550 buildings, and spend over $33 million on energy. As a partnership they are a major economic force in the city. What they buy, how they buy it and who they buy it from can shape Green Job creation in that city. When 25,000 people have to be greener at work, they tend to be greener at home too. Multiply that by their families and that is a major change in city culture.

In part 2 of this series, I talked about developing Green Entrepreneurs. The JA Company Program does just that with high school students, giving them the opportunity to start and run new companies, at least for the school year. But it relies on volunteers and donors to make it happen. Now, Buffalo has an award winning Junior Achievement Program. Last year, it was awarded its third consecutive Platinum Summit Award by the worldwide organization for, among other things, program quality and impact over the last 15 years. Worldwide, the program had over 320,000 high school students creating new companies in 2006-2007 and this reached only 2.3% of the potential market. Statistically, that means are a lot of potential young business creators in Buffalo aren’t being reached by the program. So there is plenty of opportunity for more Green Job advocates to get involved locally. That is what happened in Europe. In 2006-2007 they had over 20,000 16-18 year olds competing to get their own green companies off the ground. If even just 100 Buffalo young people were trying the same thing each year, the potential for growing Green Businesses would be substantially increased without the District doing anything.

At the other end of the spectrum is early education. Studies show that high-quality care in this developmental stage (with school readiness as a goal) is the single biggest factor in high school graduation rates. Several states and several counties in other states have developed comprehensive early care and education programs from birth to school age for this reason. Since social equity is one third of Green/Sustainable Jobs, child care is often a benefit connected with this kind of job creation. But high quality child care is a sustainable, green industry sector by itself and should be a fundamental part of any job initiative. This would give reading, writing and math scores at every level of testing a boost too.

Sure the Buffalo Public School District could do more within the curriculum. Every school district in the country could, but green education is not the function of any school district. Every person advocating green anything has a responsibility to educate the public on why going green is in the public’s best interest. When the public gets that message over and over from many different sources, it will begin to accept it. And yes, even if that public lives in Buffalo.

digulios

What Others Have To Say

  1. rubygreta

    2 ratings12345
    Apr 3rd, 14:28

    How about letting the BSD fire the worst 10% of the teachers without fear of a mega-lawsuit by the all-powerful teachers union, hmm Richard?

  2. Herdsman

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 3rd, 18:14

    Hey Rubygreta, that certainly would be in keeping with "changes to being community-focused". The question is are the teachers willing to learn new things?

    Can we also get rid of the worst 25% of the administrators at the same time?

  3. mac20

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 3rd, 22:08

    A "green" investment Buffalo Schools have made to the community through the Joint Schools Construction Project, is a number of green upgrades to reconstructed schools, including Harriet Ross Tubman, School 31, which is an award winning green building.

  4. FOIbois

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 3rd, 22:43

    The only green we need to hear about in Buffalo schools should come from new jobs. All this environmental stuff is great but it don't really mean a lot to someone livin' in a house with lead paint and asbestos covered pipes. It don't mean a whole lot to the BPS students who walk by blocks of decaying buildings just to get home. This green environmental stuff is for the rich whites who have the green to spend on their tiny new cars and twisty light bulbs. Dollar tree doesn't stock twisty light bulbs or ecofriendly windex, they carry the stuff that the non elmwood folk can afford. So you gonna teach the school kids about recycling and composting? You gonna tell them all about water conservation to keep them out of the hydrants when the parks are closed in the summer? We got more important things to worry about than the personal campaign of a has been ex presidential wannabe. You gotta understand that the inner city families been green all the time, it is the rest of you that is catching on. Inner city people walk and bus everywhere because we ain't got jobs that pay well enough to afford a car. We recycle everything especially stuff that someone else has tossed out at the curb. We shop goodwill and amvets to recycle what the rich folk don't want anymore and we give it back to goodwill or to family when we are done with it. We save water all the time because the water authority will cut you off in a heartbeat if your bill isn't paid in full signed sealed and delivered by the date due every month. We all been growing trees in gutters and porches all over the city. And we recycle copper pipes and metal all the time. Is that what you plan on teaching in the school cause we all ready got that sh** on lock.

  5. Herdsman

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 4th, 11:17

    FOIbois- you got that right. The people who need to learn about reduce, reuse and recycle are the ones that have enough money to waste. The people who are already doing it should be recognized for having good sense.

    I’ll go along with you and the good doctor, the BPS should be teaching skills that will help the kids with everything else and leave the green education to other sectors.

  6. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 4th, 15:59

    I think you two are looking at this the wrong way, a proper green education could teach children to save money and resources allowing them to live better lives. If the knew the benefits of local farmers markets, you would understand that you can eat healthier quite cheaply. I can get about 4 big linen bags of groceries (produce) for under 20 dollars. Tops or weggies you are lucky to get 1 bag of food for 20 and those are stupid little plastic ones.

    A Green education would allow people to choose a style of home that would save them money, it would better inform decisions that impact their bottom line because very often environmental issues can save you money. Think about composting / recycling. If people composed their kitchen scraps and recycled what they can,you would save space space in your tote and even be able to get the smaller tote scale from the city and save some money each month. Eventually garbage is going to be billed by pound, those that are educated in ways to reducing their garbage (besides dumping in on the nearest vacant lot) will be able to save money. those that know about energy leakage can spend 50 dollars at the beginning of winter and save hundred of dollars over the months.

    green education is MORE important for poor people because they are the ones most impacted by energy, food and transportation costs. Those people in Clarence are not going to change they make enough money to do what they want. The rest of us are the ones that need to educate ourselves to live better more efficient lives.

  7. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 4th, 16:08

    PS there are plenty of rich black folks driving around in ridiculous sized cars, just as there are plenty of poor while folks that go to Amvets, and garbage pick. No one side or income level deserves to be perched on a pedestal here. Buffalo has one of the worse canopy covers in the country a horrid recycling rate and is far from being a sustainable place to live... With a city split 50/50 by race neither side are doing a good job..

  8. Herdsman

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 5th, 10:21

    Sbrof normally I am with you on most points, but not on this one. All of the things you mentioned about the benefits of green education are true. But I don’t see why they are the responsibility of the schools.

    All of the consumer education benefits the business sector, so it should be the business sector that pays for that education. I think the city and county have a mandate to reduce landfilling, so they should be paying for recycling and composting education. I have to go with the Knaub and FOlbois on this one, the school district has enough to deal with already.

  9. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 5th, 17:32

    yeah I am not saying it should be the responsibility of the schools only but someone should be teaching these children how to be good responsible citizens, that ideally should fall on the shoulders of the parents but as we have seen for a couple generations now, parents are not doing the job and allowing kids to 'not care.' You know what happened when I talked back to didn't care.. I got the back hand of my grandmother's hand. Without parental involvement I think the shcools take on a role they can never fufill like that should but I guess that doesn't mean we shouldn't try because there isn't anyone else out there looking out for these kids.

    It also isn't something that would take away form or detract from what they already have to teach. You learn about energy, compost and much of these topics in science classes as it is. It wouldn't hurt and might actually connect with more kids on how these issues could come home to better their lives. If they could get that new pair of shoes or that CD they wanted by saving their parents and themselves some money I don't think very many people wouldn't pay attention. I agree the schools are in a loosing battle overall but until unfortunately is the only semblance of order and discipline that many children have.

  10. Herdsman

    0 ratings12345
    Apr 7th, 12:50

    Sbrof-- I’m with you that in an ideal world that the parents would be involved and the schools would integrate the environmental education with the curriculum. This kind of education is required under Kentucky law.

    But we are talking the Buffalo Public Schools here. The unions are more concerned with their concessions than with the education of the kids; most of the parents are struggling to make ends meet. As it stands now, the kids are not getting the kind of education in the basics that they COULD get and of all of the resources being wasted in Buffalo, it is the waste of these kids’ potential that is most tragic.

Would you like to subscribe to this conversation?

Enter your email below, and you will receive an alert each time someone leaves a comment on this post.

What Do You Think?

Text Links