Conventional Wisdom

Conventional Wisdom

Story Options

Now that there is a new County Executive coming into office, it is probably a good time to start to rally behind a new Convention Center. As history would have it, the Gorski administration was behind the idea… the Giambra administration was not behind the idea… and the Collins administration? Preliminary signs say that this new administration would probably back the idea… at least we can hope so. There are so many reasons to abandon the current building – can you imagine what could be done on the property that the existing Convention Center sits on… not to mention reopening the disrupted street system? With all of the rest of the building that is taking place in that area, it is an opportune time to evaluate a transition to another site while freeing up a prime parcel of land. Rumor has it that there have been talks… just talks… about looking at alternative sites such as the DL&W Terminal for possible future location possibilities. Can you imagine… on the Buffalo River? Unfortunately that building has been deemed too small for the likes of a Convention Center. Fortunately the building is solid enough to add additional floors to accommodate such a plan. Could there be a better location than the terminus of the Metro Rail? And so close to other amenities such as the Erie Basin Marina, the HSBC Arena, and the Erie Canal Terminus?

I spoke with Ed Healy, Director of Communications at the Buffalo Niagara Convention & Visitors Bureau, who told me that the CVB would be in favor of a new Convention Center, and perhaps the stars might finally align to see such a project come to fruition. Despite the current out-of-date (it always was) facility, the CVB still manages to pull its weight as far as midsized city conventions go. “We can’t compete with NYC and Chicago,” he told me. “But we’re good at competing with other markets considering the facility. Can you imagine what we could do with a state-of-the-art building in an area of town near other big draws? When we go to other convention markets we don’t just stay at the convention… we go out for dinner, and hop into taxis, and sometimes buy clothing. Conventions create ripple effects in the community. Chris Collins has expressed his support for a rededication of funds from the Bed Tax for marketing our city. That would be a dedicated $7,000,000 with $2,000,000 of that going towards operating the Convention Center. That would put us in the same league as Cleveland. People always say that we should be marketing to Toronto… well a small marketing effort in a city of that size would cost a couple hundred thousand dollars. Look at all of the investments that this city has made in tourism products, and then ask yourself why we’ve been held back from marketing our city properly.”

prometheus233.com half banner

What Others Have To Say

  1. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:00

    i would love to get a new convention center for all the reasons previously cited. it would even be better if we could get built with a leed certification platinum rating to further reinforce buffalo's new green industries (wind farm, and ethanol - lets not get too sidetracked about a ethanol debate, you get the idea tho).

    Building a new center from scratch and reopening the street would be great. but i think it would be remiss not to evaluate a retrofit (or for that matter the economic impact of a "no build" option) of the current structure. Wouldnt a redesigned facade with incorporated storefronts and a more visually appealing exterior could do wonders for downtown and the facility?

    clearly there must be some internal upgrades that would be required - an insider would undouptedly have more insight (was that redundant?)

  2. sbrof

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:15

    I doubt that the Collins admin is going to support something like this for the city but if he did, I still feel that the site behind the HSBC atrium is probably one of the best sites for a new convention center. It is HUGE, currently wide open as parking, has little to no historic value since it was mostly industrial / rail lines back in the day. Also it would provide a great buffer from the Highway for the cobblestone district mitigating its effects on that part of downtown.

    The truth of the matter is these buildings always have a HUGE ugly side to loading and services. If we place it on the water like in New Orleans for example we are either ruining the waterfront of putting the ass of the building to the city. Why not put the ass of the building right under the raised 190. Its already ugly, noisy and not able to be developed. Plus imagine the marketing potential for the highway, the sight of a huge buildings like that being constructed, the option for a signage on the roof. The perception would be huge! Like driving by the waterfront tower + Healthnow.. There is construction going on downtown pretty steadily now for several years,. keep that momentum going as all those people drive away home. Leave them thinking there is something going on downtown.

  3. Drew

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:18

    I was shocked at just how ugly the convention center looks from the outside. What was the inspiration? A cardboard box?

    I think a new one would be great. For a wonderful example of a new, green, waterfront Convention center in a mid-size post-industrial city, see Pittsburgh's. http://int2.cof.org/conferences/ac2006/images/greenconv.gif

  4. halljd39

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:21

    Ok - if anyone has followed Jim Kelly's recent comments on the Buffalo Bills and yes a convention center in Downtown, you might start to get all tingly inside. Jim Kelly stated that he has been talking about the possility of building a new "Ralph Wilson or Rich" (which ever you want) stadium Downtown. Also there were some comments about having a convention center built next to it. This would be an interesting multi use of both venues, as you could have concerts or rallies at the stadium and meetings in the convention center, etc... etc... Not to say you couldn't already do it at HSBC Arena, but having another option is always an added plus, especially when it is Downtown.

  5. sbrof

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:27

    Someplace like the Ohio Street Basin has the space also but is too far from downtown to really feel the spin off effects. The site behind the atrium could have its entrance only 2 blocks from Metro Rail, Across the street from the new Savarino projects, 2.5 blocks from the new Erie Canal Harbor and the opposite end would be kitty corner to the new Casino Developments. It would pretty much create a U of developments. Erie Canal Harbor stuff - Convention Center, Casino. Inside that U is mostly parking right now ALL of which would become VERY desirable for developments. If we want spin offs, this is probably one of the best places in downtown to put it. without killing another area for its butt end.

  6. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:31

    I read the comments by JIm Kelly and I have to say that I agree with halljd. A waterfrom stadium/convention center would be outstanding. It creates a stadium that is a destination for year round events. Not just football games. It open up the current convention center site for development in the heart of downtown. It brings the Orchard Park Bills back to Buffalo.

    sbrof-to address your concern about "the ass of the building" this problem can be solved with underground parking and loading docks.

    This is a great idea that will never ever get funded. Maybe the Toronto Bills will get a nice waterfront stadium and convention center on Lake Ontario.

  7. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:33

    *waterfront....I am still demanding spell check...

  8. al-alo

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:35

    Sleep8,

    waht dew ewe neeed spell czech four?

  9. Perry

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:36

    I just saw the Pittsburgh Convention Center a few weeks ago - cool looking building. A new, much larger convention center would attract more out-of-town groups. I like the idea of something down by HSBC Arena, where people could walk out and explore the Erie Canal Harbor area.

  10. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:43

    A stadium in the downtown area will never work.

    1) With the casino taking up that block and the 190 using up so much space, there is not one contiguous parcel large enough to accomodate the footprint of the stadium. Period. And I challenge anyone to find a politician who would support tearing down government or low-income housing in the area.

    2) The Bills DEPEND on people travelling from great distances to fill up the seats. In order to accomodate everyone from Rochester and points east, northern PA and southern Ontario, there has to be a great deal of parking (not to mention those in the Southtowns who have no rail access)... building a downtown stadium would require massive parking structures, sucking up otherwise developable blocks. Underground parking? Can't go underground far enough for the number of people that have no choice but to drive to the games.

    A new convention center is much more feasible. In a region like ours, conventions don't instantaneously draw 75,000 people like the Bills do... HSBC Arena holds just short of 20,000, a number much closer to what a local convention would.

    Sbrof has the right idea... locate the loading docks towards the 190 where nobody but Buffalo News trucks and employees drive anyway, and give the rest of the city a great view of a nice new building right behind the HSBC Atrium (perhaps even incorporate that building if HSBC still wants out?).

    Any new Bills stadium should (a) make a statement and show a commitment to "green" ideals by building a self-sustaining/energy efficient/etc. building on remediated land on the Outer Harbor or in Lackawanna; or (b) enhance the push for truly regionalizing the franchise (its only hope of survival in the NFL) by placing it in Niagara County or some other point that makes it easier for folks from Toronto, Hamilton, St. Catherines, etc. to get to the games (mayve open up the Can-Pass only Whirlpool Bridge on game days to ticket holders as well as the Lewiston-Queenston?).

  11. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:53

    The DLW Terminal would be great for a convention center, but I doubt it is wide enough to host many conventions that showcase larger products or displays that can't be transported to multiple floors of a building.

    SLEEPL8 - notice where loading is for pretty much every convention center in the country: street level to accomodate semi's, flatbeds, etc. You need good-sized loading docks and large bays to off-load many of the products and displays at conventions... and getting them up and down multiple floors would require a massive investment in lifts and/or unsightly ramps inside the center itself.

    The convention center NEEDS to be downtown to take advantage of the hotels, restaurants, etc. A football stadium does not.

    They are, actually, wastes of space. Seven regular season games, one preseason game (one of each going to Toronto), and a concert or two if you're very, very lucky. Throw in another event or two and you've got at most 15 days out of the year a football stadium is used. A stadium is better suited on the Outer Harbor (where nothing ever gets done), on a redeveloped brownfield or - and this might be most significant for the Bills' future - north of the city in Niagara County or another town accomodating to S. Ontario.

  12. Spaulding97

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:55

    If there was ever a time to start this it would be now. With all the development happening around the cobblestone and waterfront it just makes sense. Not to mention the Bills lease going void in 2012, enough time to get some funding. Albany was already tried to give the Jets (i think) almost $1 billion for a new stadium. We can try for something like they have under construction in Indy for under $700 million. Still not cheap, but it wouldn't be. Bundle it all together, retractable roof, convention center as one. If Albany was willing to give that much to downstate, they should be able to give us some too.

  13. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 10:58

    Completely unrelated but comical...read the last paragraph of this article...Good publicity for Buffalo?

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/08/drug.traffic/index.html

  14. al-alo

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:02

    there is a space for a stadium: on top of the Perry St. projects. it makes sense for a couple of reasons. theres a fair amount of vacant land around them (surprise!), housing projects are a good intentioned yet failed urban policy, they are ajacent to the highway, and is adjacent to the route of the Buffalo Bills express (didnt you know, amtrak operates a special train from albany to bills games [and bused into orchard park]?).

  15. al-alo

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:04

    there is even precedent for builing on the projects, the old aud atop the rough canal neighborhood!

  16. SLEEPL8

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:12

    Zabka...I am sure there are architects out there savy enough to engineer a convention center that doesnt put its loading docks on display. It is hardly an issue. A stadium down town is feasible. We have the "space to waste" The 190 and 33 can handle a greater volume of traffic than the 90 and 219 in blasdell/OP. I will never understand he infrastructure argument against a downtown stadium. The infrastructure supports thousands of commuter vehicles every weekdeay morning why wouldnt it support thousands on Sunday? Yes, access roads may need to be widened and some clever engineering may be required but it is far from impossible. I agree that the waterfront may not be the best place for the stadium due to limited access but the near east side somewhere between the 33 and 190 can support it. Ideally in close proximity to the ball park and HSBC arena. If anyone out there agrees with me and has a site in mind please back me up on this.

  17. flyguy

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:12

    Maybe its time to consider moving the Perry Projects and preparing that area for a stadium/ convention center? You have the Cobblestona District, A Casino, new loft housing and Elk Terminal. No its not a bash on the low income there but perhaps those projects are just too old or beat and the site would be better redeveloped instead of being "the projects". This way you would be relatively close to the HSBC Arena as well. Maybe get the land behnid the HSBC Atrium as the Convention Center, put a stadium on the projects? I dunno maybe this is a crazy idea and heck the projects probably dont offer enough land anyway. It would seem like that general area woyuld be well suited for those uses. Then again somewhere out on the outer harbor might be good for a convention center/ stadium as long as you have stacked parking, you have legitimate connections to downtown for car/ pedestrian/ AND RAIL. That Buffalo River need not divide downtown from the outer harbor if solid connections are made over or under it. We do have ship traffic on the Buffalo River and shouldnt cut that off so if you go over I guess it would be a lift bridge or something.

  18. flyguy

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:13

    Wow your totally on the same page as al-alo. As I typed my comment I saw you were thinking like me.

  19. zen

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:15

    Wouldn't it make much more sense to simply build a new convention ctr next to the current Ralph Wilson Stad? Does anyone know who designed the convention ctr, please don't tell me it was Cannon.

  20. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:20

    al-alo... if the projects weren't there, I'd agree there was plenty of room to build a football stadium in the area. But do you HONESTLY think there is the political will at the city, county, state or even federal level to demolish housing projects that serve thousands of people for a football stadium?

    I'm optimisic there is (and a more viable alternative made available to those folks living there), but I highly, highly doubt it.

    Also, the Bills express (are you sure it still operates?) never brought in more than a few hundred people to WNY for the games.

    The Bills are not AND SHOULD NOT be in the business of helping out the city of Buffalo. If we want a team in WNY, the Bills have to be selfish and in the business of cultivating their client base in southern Ontario. Make it easier for people there to come to games. If high-speed rail between Toronto and St. Catherines is really coming, put the stadium in Niagara County, provide charter buses from train stations, malls, wherever in St. Catherines and Queenston to the games, petition to have the Whirlpool Bridge opened to the general public on game days only, and so on.

  21. vgs

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:26

    WilliamZabka - if they want to build it downtown they will make the room. NYC had an 800million dollar stadium for the Jets designed for Manhattan, I think Buffalo has a little more land options than Manhattan. The outer harbor with metro rail extention is certainly a viable option as is the multiple parking lots between Cobblestone-Casino and behind HSBC Atrium. Look at where they jammed Pilot Field in. Granted this project would 3x the size but the area behind HSBC Atrium probably is 3x the size of the Swan-Washington area. You cannot use the OP parking concept for an urban application. Everything about getting to and enjoying game day experience would be different, probably more dignified actually. Taxi's, public transportation, Amtrak and even walking to the game would be required by many. Probably no more tailgating and full restuarants instead. Coming on Sat night and staying over in downtown hotel sound like a pretty good plan.

    Niagara County makes some sense but we already have no problem selling out in OP every week. Who wants to invest 250K in a luxury suite in Wheatfield. If 73,000 find thier way to OP each sunday then I think Buffalo would be a big improvement.

  22. sally

    5 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:30

    Let's NOT follow in Pittsburgh's footsteps on the convention ceter issue. Their convention center is a HUGE drain on community resouces and has been a dismal failure. Here is a link to a study of it by the Allegheny Institute.

    http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:YWPZJsOPoj4J:www.alleghenyinstitute.org/issues/issue6.pdf+%22pittsburgh+convention+center%22+white+elephant&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

  23. chris_h_23

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:32

    al-alo --- I agree....I think on top of the Perry Projects is a great place for a new stadium!

  24. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:32

    SLEEPL8 - I never made the argument the 33 and 190 can't handle the influx of people. The problem is where does that influx go? There simply isn't enough parking in the area without building giant parking structures.

    I want to agree with you that there is a site for the stadium in the area you describe. But without demolishing the Perry St. projects and completely reshaping the area with parking, street widening and removal in some cases, it just won't fit.

    Again, a football stadium is better suited for an area like Orchard Park, Wheatfield, brownfields in Lackawanna, etc. Without a fully functioning public transit system that supports the entire region (and don't give me the buses... please), it makes no sense to go into the city.

    Put the convention center there. Put the Bills elsewhere.

  25. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:38

    vgs - the Bills DON'T sell out every week. They were the ONLY TEAM IN THE NFL last season to not sell out every game and as of right now they are the only one on pace to not sell out every game this year. They have un-sold suites this year. It is clear as day they need to regionalize further. Tap into Toronto and Southern Ontario further. If you aren't going to just build next to where you currently are, make a statement and rehabilitate some brownfields in Lackawanna or build closer to those very Canadians in Niagara County.

    Manhattan had a huge site they were going to build on for the Jets on the West Side. Not to mention, MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of people could easily get there via public transit. Not so in WNY.

    And you misread what I wrote... I agree an Outer Harbor stadium could work. Just like Pittsburgh, it would be "within the city" but across a river from the downtown core. I just don't think a stadium right in downtown can work. Anywhere. Look at the sheer size of the footprint modern stadiums take up. And find me land to replicate that downtown without relocating thousands of residents, businesses, etc.

    I'm all for that, I just don't think the political will exists at any level to get it done.

  26. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 11:40

    WilliamZabkaAllStars - While there is not one parcel that could currently fit a project like this, blocks could be merged to do so. Just like the casino but 4x the size.

    As far as the public housing goes, isn't it the job of the politicians to do what the public wants? I think it is. With this being the case, I can pretty much assure you that everyone in the city outside of those who live in the Perry Projects would not mind those projects coming down to make room for this. Give those people housing vouchers to move into the 10k or so VACANT homes inside of the city.

    As far as parking...there is a planned loop connection the Metro to the 1st Ward that would run around the "former" Perry Projects. This would allow for a park and ride all the way from UB. :)

  27. al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 12:05

    WilliamZabkaAllStars,

    you know, im not entirely sure the BBE express still runs. that said, id suggest it prob wasnt well marketed by amtrak or the bills.

    frankly, i would understand why it would not be as popular as it could be if you needed to take a connecting bus ride. now, say a downtown stadium exisited on the perry st site, a buffalo bills express could pull right up to the stadium. actually, it would be easy to add local service (ie, depew, NF) where there already are existing amtrak stations. so now instead of just a few hundred or thousand, you could move many thousands without the need for land intensive parking areas, and lets face it, less drinking and driving.

    and, not just let me get a little crazy, if metro rail was connected to UB (and at this point, i dont care if it ever made an intermediate stop between campuses - campi? forget it. doesnt matter. you get the idea), you get 10 of thousands of students with disposable income who would likely love to go to a game.

    on the non selling out issue. let me make 2 points. one, the ralph is one of the larger stadiums in the league. why should there be a 15,000 person differnce between a sell out in buffalo and a sell out in indy. secondly, the bills havent exactly been doing great the last few years. maybe if there was a team on the field to get excited about, then folks would show up. the fact that anybody goes to see the mediocore product says a lot about the devotion of Bills fans.

  28. sbrof

    4 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 12:33

    The point of a downtown stadium isn't that everyone would drive. You could leave you cars in the burbs and commute. I guarantee the NFTA would have buses lined up at the Galleria, McKinley and elsewhere for passengers to leave the car and take the bus. They do it now for work.

    Also bringing the stadium into downtown would make it a shorter drive and more accessible not only to WNY but also all those Toronto fans they want to bring. Remember they all have to drive THROUGH downtown and continue past it for another 20 minutes and probably close to 30 with the current traffic. As someone mentioned earlier the dynamics of travel to a stadium in downtown vs OP are not comparable and just as you wouldn't expect people to use transit to go to OP you wouldn't expect people to drive downtown.

    PLUS people spend 8-15 dollars to park their car in OP now.. that 3.50 (2 zone) round trip bus / train ticket sounds pretty good to me and guess what you can drink MORE cause you don't have to drive right away.. Bonus to everyone. Those buses can be the slow bus to sobriety before unleashing 70,000 "influenced" people onto the roads. (unlike what happens now where they just all leave alcohol and all).

  29. atypical

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 13:39

    WilliamZabkaAllStars,

    Can you explain to me how cities like Baltimore, Houston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, New Orleans, Tampa, Detroit, Chicago, Seattle, St.Louis, and Indy all survive having downtown stadiums?

    If the Bills truly want to regionalize, a downtown stadium is the only way to go.

    Buffalo was built on transportation and we need to fall back to our roots as a transportation hub. We need high speed trains connecting Cleveland-Erie, Albany, and Toronto - all meeting together in downtown Buffalo. This new station would be built close to our new convention center and stadium.

    It's time to think big. We need a new convention center. The Bills need a new stadium closer to Southern Ontario. And we need a new train/bus station. Let's hire the best to make it happen. Oh, and yes, have Albany foot the bill.

    GO BUFFALO!

  30. bflorox

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 13:43

    WZAS, the Bills were the only not sellout BEFORE the TV deadline. All games did sellout last year eventually.

    I don't think the Bills should be anywhere but DT. I'm not convinced by any of the arguments made to put them in Niagara County or Canada. How do we rail against UB Amherst, Geico, et al and then say we should put the Bills in another county or country?

    My pipedream development would be a domed stadium skinned to look like a giant buffalo. There is a parcel of land ~ .5 mi. East of HSBC Arena bound by Exchange to the North, 190 to the South, Louisiana to the West and Hamburg to the East that has a rail line running through the North side. With a reconfigured 190 interchange and some creative design, you could fit a stadium and several parking structures with direct rail and Thruway access.

  31. kahawa

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 13:45

    For urban Torontonians, there's only a few nails to hit, and they should hit again and again with this target group: Darwin Martin House, Albright Knox, Elmwood Avenue. Hit and hit and hit, on those three only.

    One of the downsides of politically-overseen marketing efforts is the fear of excluding constituencies in marketing efforts, so every potential attraction is grouped together in bland, phonebook-like brochures explaining in detail everything from the McKinley Mall to the kazoo museum.

  32. impressingagent

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 13:47

    I like the idea that a stadium could be connected to the outer harbor bridge and rail system. The stadium could support giant wind turbines, though they might want to look at other options for the rocket man. A stadium as it is would make enough of a presence and i bet they could find away to accommodate the fans much better then at the ralph. Having water on both sides and the proximity to the inner harbor and cobblestone would really be a push.

    not sure about the convention center. The current location looks like an imperial seven eleven. I wouldn't mind if they found some spot off the elm st ramp.

  33. brokeleg

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:18

    People have you all lost your minds? The convention center is a shiny peice of our rich Soviet heritage. Josef Stalin and Nikita Khrushchev would be so proud of us. C'mon the thing looks like...cement?

    By the way I'm being sarcastic.

    As i heard on the radio this morning the Indianapolis Colts are building a 65,000 seat domed stadium with an attached convention center, at a cost of around 600 mil. For two hugely important projects thats not a bad idea. That way the stadium could be used more than ten times a year. Oh, heavens me, its eight now.

  34. nick

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:33

    While I love public transportation, I would NEVER go to a bills game that way. You can't take a grill or case of beer on Metro. When the bills suck, which has been often recently, most people still go to games to tailgate, moving the stadium downtown anywhere other than the republic steel site or areas with enough space for parking would effectually end tailgating as we know it. Add a roof to the mix and you've taken all that makes a bills game special and created a sabres game. Don't get me wrong I love sabres games, but a bills game is an event full of friends, food and football.

  35. LivingForge

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:37

    Detroit just built a downtown stadium that is fully integrated into the city. I've never been but I pulled up this map to see how they did it.

    They built it right next door to their baseball field, so I presume that they share lots with that location. There is already a lot of parking for HSBC center, so you can see that there is already existing infrastructure in place. Also, you can see that according to the Detroit model, you don't have to have a stadium surrounded by a sea of contiguous parking lots (as currently exists at the Ralph and elsewhere around the league). On the map lot 1,2,3,4, and 5 are (I'm assuming) run by the stadium(s), but they aren't contiguous and lots 1,2, and 3 don't even abut the stadium. You can also see that in the "Fox Garage" next to the Fox Theatre they direct some of the parking to lots run by private (or at least, non-stadium) interests.

    The example shows, I think, that it is possible to have a downtown stadium, you just have to break with the thinking that stadiums must be anchored by a sea of parking around the perimeter. Not so, it turns out. We have all of the elements in Buffalo exhibited in the Detroit model:

    1. Existing stadiums with which to share parking (HSBC Arena and Dunn Tire both have garages) 2. Existing private garages. (Downtown is empty on Sunday anyway right? I'm sure garage owners would love to get another day's revenue). Plus the casino has a massive garage planned right in the Cobblestone district. 3. Many vacant lots that could be small surface lots (like lots 1,2, and 3 on the map). Plus there is an existing private surface lot structure in place in the area already for Sabres games along Ohio St and that area.

    Plus you can't see it on the map here, but on the larger, original one you see that Detroit's rail line runs around the city and comes within blocks of the ballpark/stadium compound.

    4. MetroRail already runs to this area as does Amtrak.

    Parking should in no way cause a stadium in Cobblestone to run afoul.

    PS - Domed and shaped like a Buffalo? Come on! The way to go on this is to build a retractable roof stadium so that Buffalo can still have winter games which provide a certain level of "classic" football winter weather mystique to northern teams (snow games are fun to watch and talk about: see New England and Green Bay for examples outside of Buffalo). But the retractable roof would allow the venue to be used for concerts, monster truck rallies, and open the possibility of a Super Bowl being held here.

    As for looking like a Buffalo, that's just insane. Look at Ford Field's exterior for an example of a stadium that takes its urban (I'd even say Rust Belt) location as inspiration: http://www.downtownpartnership.org/ddp/images/Detroit_Ford_Field.JPG

    Full map can be seen here: http://www.fordfield.com/section_display.cfm?section_id=105&top=1&level=3

  36. brokeleg

    3 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:41

    Buffalo is actually hosting some serious conferences in the next few years. The Nat'l Historic Preservation Society, American Solar Institute, an environmental planning one, all in 2009 or 2010, I cant remember their actual names but the point is we need to establish a niche. If we build green-energy buildings it will attract environmental groups and were already raging for our historic preservation. We cant land everything but those two fieldswill be very hot in the near future.

    Oh, and heres a novel idea for the parking issue, GET THE FUCK OUT OF YOUR CAR AND INTO A TRAIN! Regular cities use public transport. The reason downtown is the way it is is because in the 60s we thought everything should revolve around the car, if any of you idiots knew anything about our history you would be lobbying for an extensive metro system. And for all you sniveling suburbanites who cant live without your lexuses park at LaSalle station, thats what its there for.

  37. LivingForge

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:43

    Detroit just built a downtown stadium that is fully integrated into the city. I've never been but I pulled up this map to see how they did it.

    http://www.fordfield.com/section_display.cfm?section_id=105&top=1&level=3

    They built it right next door to their baseball field so that they share lots with that location. There is already a lot of parking for HSBC center, so you can see that there is already existing infrastructure in place in Buffalo. Also, you can see that according to the Detroit model, you don't have to have a stadium surrounded by a sea of contiguous parking lots (as currently exists at the Ralph and elsewhere around the league). On the map lot 1,2,3,4, and 5 are (I'm assuming) run by the stadium(s), but they aren't contiguous and lots 1,2, and 3 don't even abut the stadium. You can also see that in the "Fox Garage" next to the Fox Theatre they direct some of the parking to lots run by private (or at least, non-stadium) interests.

    The example shows, I think, that it is possible to have a downtown stadium, you just have to break with the thinking that stadiums must be anchored by a sea of parking around the perimeter. Not so, it turns out. We have all of the elements in Buffalo exhibited in the Detroit model:

    1. Existing stadiums with which to share parking (HSBC Arena and Dunn Tire both have garages) 2. Existing private garages. (Downtown is empty on Sunday anyway right? I'm sure garage owners would love to get another day's revenue). Plus the casino has a massive garage planned right in the Cobblestone district. 3. Many vacant lots that could be small surface lots (like lots 1,2, and 3 on the map). Plus there is an existing private surface lot structure in place in the area already for Sabres games along Ohio St and that area.

    Also Detroit's rail line runs around the city and comes within blocks of the ballpark/stadium compound.

    4. MetroRail already runs to Cobblestone as does Amtrak.

    Parking should in no way cause a stadium plan in Cobblestone to run afoul.

    PS - Domed and shaped like a Buffalo? Come on! The way to go on this is to build a retractable roof stadium so that Buffalo can still have winter games which provide a certain level of "classic" football winter weather mystique to northern teams (snow games are fun to watch and talk about: see New England and Green Bay for examples outside of Buffalo). But the retractable roof would allow the venue to be used for concerts, monster truck rallies, and open the possibility of a Super Bowl being held here.

    As for looking like a Buffalo, that's just insane. Look at Ford Field's exterior for an example of a stadium that takes its urban (I'd even say Rust Belt) location as inspiration: http://www.downtownpartnership.org/ddp/images/Detroit_Ford_Field.JPG

  38. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:45

    atypical - Baltimore, Houston, Philly, Atlanta, Detroit, and St. Louis all have ACRES of parking around their stadiums. Several of those, plus Chicago and Seattle all have fantastic public transit systems for bringing in thousands upon thousands of people to the stadium. Not sure about Indy, Tampa or New Orleans. We have neither in the city.

    And what about the Patriots, Jets, Giants, Packers, Vikings, Dolphins, Cowboys, Cardinals, Kansas City, Redskins, Broncos, Titans, Jaguars? All teams who have - or will have - new(er) facilities in suburban or rural areas. They aren't concerned with redevelopment of an urban area because that ain't their mission as a business. Nor should it be.

    You're all offering bad examples - cities that have downtown stadiums either all have abundant parking or superior public transit systems. We have neither. And enough of this calling for downtown to become part of some ridiculous transportation hub. Good luck trying to get the state or county to fork over the multi-millions (billions?) it would take to extend light rail all over the place, improve train access, etc. We all know they won't spend nearly as much on us as they would on the Jets or Yankees or any other team in the NYC metro area.

    NOBODY has given one legitimate business reason it is in the Buffalo Bills' best interest to put a stadium downtown. People being bussed in from the McKinley mall? Going to restaurants for sit-down meals before games? None of this... NONE OF THIS... helps the Bills at all. They need to stretch every dollar as far as they possibly can, and the expenses they would incurr as a part of some vast infrastructure redevelopment associated with a downtown stadium is beyond what anyone can afford.

    Let's not forget... the Bills are profitable because Ralph Wilson carries zero debt on the team, the stadium, etc. A new owner(s) is going to have to spend $700 million + to purchase the team, and then contribute serious dough to a new stadium (at least another $300-500 million). If part of that new stadium is a massive public transit and highway reconfiguration and development project, that amount rises even more. Per NFL rules and regulations, a team can only borrow up to $150 million against the team... that means we're going to need someone with either $1 billion in hand to buy the team and help finance a new stadium, or someone with a lucrative business that can borrow against that business for the hundreds of millions necessary to construct a new stadium.

    Of course it can be done, people. I don't doubt that and wish it could happen. I just think its cheaper, more efficient and BETTER FOR THE FRANCHISE if its done with the Bills in mind, and not the City of Buffalo. Building in the City does absolutely nothing for the Bills' bottom line.

    The Bills should follow the Patriots' lead (in more ways that one, as much as it pains me to say it)... build in an area (Foxboro) roughly halfway between the two largest metro areas in the region (Boston and Providence, with Hartford not much further away). If the Bills truly want to regionalize, they should learn from the masters. Build between Buffalo and Hamilton, with Toronto not much further away.

  39. LivingForge

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:49

    You're all offering bad examples - cities that have downtown stadiums either all have abundant parking or superior public transit systems. We have neither.

    What about my example Zabka? Detroit's urban blight situation is worse than Buffalo's, and the public transportations system isn't markedly better. They just made smart decisions by putting sports arenas near each other so as to share infrastructure and broke up the surface lots that are a remnant of suburban stadium thinking.

  40. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:53

    LivingForge - I've been to Detroit several times (one Bills game, a handful of Tigers games). You're right, the parking need not be contiguous. But it needs to be there. A downtown stadium in the area near HSBC where people are proposing it go would go OVER much of that parking. Look at a map of the area on Google Maps or take a walk down there. There are currently two lots behind the HSBC Atrium (one right up next to it, another at the end of that block). There is a giant lot across from the BRO headquarters. Those would be GONE if a new stadium went down there. Detroit is a great example, but unrealistic when comparing it to Buffalo... too many buildings (Casino, Elk Terminal, block after block of projects, the Nicholson (?) metal building) would have to come down. If they were all vacant, it might happen, but as it is... it won't.

    People still need to give one legitimate business reason the BILLS should want the stadium downtown. Because nobody's given one. I don't know where you people expect to get all the money for this. Let's start there... where do you people think the just under billion dollars for a new stadium, convention center, public transit and highway reconfiguration development plan is going to come from?

  41. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 14:58

    Forge - once a stadium AND convention center went up, tell me where the lots - contiguous or not - would be? The large ones around HSBC that are there now would be gone, don't forget that.

    And remember, once you put those in place, you preclude all future develoopment in that area of the city.

    I don't think some of you realize just how infrequently stadiums - even those in downtown areas - are used. I have friends or family who live IN Philly, Baltimore, Houston and Pittsburgh. NONE OF THEM have been to the stadiums except for football games.

    I agree with everyone calling for a new convention center and think this would be a great location. But a football stadaium attached to it does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FOR THE CITY except for at most 10-12 days a year. The investment that would be necessary isn't worth the return.

  42. SLEEPL8

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:00

    At least we have a cocaine shortage according to CNN.

  43. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:02

    If you people want a radical idea for a City of Buffalo football stadium, try this on for size - the Central Terminal location.

    Let's be honest... nothing is ever... EVER going to happen there of any economic value. The surrounding neighborhood is deteriorating at a rapid pace and a major kick-start is needed. Why not demolish all but the iconic tower portion of the central terminal and build a retro-looking stadium right next door, even incorporating the old terminal as one entrance? There is more than enough land for parking, storage/garages, the office building the team would need, and practice fields. Further, land would not be difficult to acquire in the surrounding neighborhood as more and more homes burn, rot while vacant, etc.

    Rail access is a no-brainer, and improving highway access to the area wouldn't cost any more than what people are proposing for the HSBC Atrium area. Just a thought...

  44. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:04

    Oh, and just got back from lunch... congrats on 40 Under 40, Newell!!!

  45. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:07

    If you REALLY want to spur development/transit change, push for a stadium on the Outer Harbor (old Pier site?). Watch how fast Outer Harbor access and Furhman Blvd. redevelopment follows, light rail is extended....

  46. ksarkisian

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:23

    and Ford field rates top 10.

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/football/nfl/11/01/fvi.intro/index.html

  47. Spaulding97

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:36

    Think about it this way: all those cities that were named above (Detroit, Indy,etc) are really the only major cities in their state. Therefore, the funding for these projects would funded by their capital. In any other scenario, Buffalo would be that city. But it's not and all the focus and funding goes to NYC. So we get screwed and continue to be getting screwed.

  48. DanielSack

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:49

    Sorry I can't remember where I read it but within the last week both Collins and Keane were asked about a new convention center. Keane gave the idea a little conditional support. Collins rejected the idea.

    And it is a bad idea if it is built with taxpayer money. If it were a good idea private investors would build it.

    A stadium at the outer harbor? I see a 50 acre parking lot and no other development. The Ralph is used for NFL football maybe 10 times per year. Other minor events perhaps double that number. With 365 days in most years a football stadium is not going to bring much development anywhere.

    Check out all the development along Abbott Road where the Ralph is! Convention centers bringing development? Check out all the development near the Javits Convention Center in Manhattan (there is none)!

    Any business needs customers at least 40 hours per week. Convention centers and stadiums simply don't provide that. Check out all the development around the baseball park!

    See http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/bromley/ccs/part1.htm http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/bromley/ccs/part2.htm

    and up to ...../part6.htm

    if you want reasoned arguments for opposing a convention center

    Also

    http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/bromley/ccs/

    for more info

  49. RonR

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 15:55

    WZAS,

    You are really off base. The plain truth is when the Bills are sole only 2 things will happen.

    1- A new stadium will be built downtown 2- They move

    Staying in OP is not really an option. The new owner will be looking at the debt from paying for the team and payroll. He will need a new stadium and the revenue that creates to keep them in Buffalo.

    In speaking of parking and location...

    Baltimore - IN THE CITY. Has ample parking but is sharing with Camden Yards. About 1/2 of what DT has and the 1/2 could be done with ease.

    Houston - IN THE BURBS.

    Philly - IN THE BURBS

    Atlanta - Similar location to the East Side or 1st ward. Does not have a lot of parking lots but parking is done on empty home lots. We have those too!

    Detroit - IN THE CITY and has no more parking then what Buffalo has. Also, the Current Metro is just as close as their mass transit.

    St. Louis - IN THE CITY. Has parking but it is for the stadium and a convention center as they are one in the same.

    As far as your examples of both New York teams, Boston, DC, Denver and Dallas they are in huge METRO areas and the cost of locating downtown would be prohibitive.

    Minnesota is located downtown and not in the burbs as you claim.

    KC is located in the burbs and has been for decades. There is no plans for a new stadium but rather $850 M in renovations to it and the park for the Royals. Not in rural areas like you claim.

    The Titans play in a new stadium just outside of DOWNTOWN, similar to an outer harbor location in Buffalo, not in rural areas like you claim.

    Jacksonville - Only a couple of parking lots and is downtown, not in rural areas like you claim.

    Did you just pull this out of your ass? Take a look at a map and do some research before you claim info like this.

  50. Sulley

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:09

    Atlanta - Similar location to the East Side or 1st ward. Does not have a lot of parking lots but parking is done on empty home lots. We have those too!

    No, it's downtown next to the GWCC.

  51. distas

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:14

    a good place for a stadium would be where the HUGE empty lot where South Park meets the Buffalo river. It would be perfect. then extend the light rail. not sure about how South Buffalonians will feel about it tho.........

  52. SLEEPL8

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:14

    Details on all nfl stadiums for you researchers: http://www.stadiumsofnfl.com/

  53. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:31

    RonR -

    Baltimore - You're not making any point I already didn't. Massive amounts of parking, and yes... in part because they share with the Orioles. So what? My point still stands... once a stadium is built in the location people are describing, those lots will be GONE. Then what?

    Houston - I never said they were in the city or anywhere else... atypical did. Stop putting words in my mouth.

    Philly - you're wrong. Not in the burbs. Next to Citizens Bank Park, the old Spectrum, and the new arena. All in SOUTH PHILLY. Surrounded by parking lots, but a reasonable amount... great planning by Philly. Philly - IN THE BURBS

    Atlanta - I don't know about you, but when I was in Atlanta for the Final Four, there was parking everywhere. Reminded me of Detroit.

    Detroit - Again, I know its in the city. And it DOES have plenty more parking than Buffalo does. Those surface lots all around it and Comerica which we partially recreate near HSBC would all be gone if a new stadium went up.

    St. Louis - Been there. Know exactly where it is... and that its surrounded by ample parking, like you mention.

    Not sure what your point is about New York teams, Boston, DC, Denver and Dallas. I know where they are, and I understand they are in huge metro areas. But the fact remains, they build to make money for themselves. Not interested in what a metro area might want. That's how a team SHOULD operate. And don't give me prohibitive crap... the Jets were going to spend nearly a billion for a West Side stadium. DC is building a brand new baseball stadium IN the city. The Yankees AND Mets are building in the city.

    Minnesota - not sure how I slipped up there, as I've been there before. You're right, in the city, my foul up.

    KC - I've been there. Yes its in the burbs. I never said it was rural, like you claim. Wrong again. The Bills would be better suited to follow their lead and continually renovate the Ralph.

    Titans - play just outside of downtown... which I consider the burbs. Either way, my point there was surrounded by lots. Have you been there? I have... as many as The Ralph. Again, I never claimed it was rural. Again, stop putting words in my mouth.

    Jacksonville - the place is a dump. If that is still considered "downtown" Jacksonville has bigger problems than I thought. To me, it is located on what is akin to our Outer Harbor.

    I don't think you're even close on the two things that could happen. One, yes... the Bills could move. Two, there's no reason they need a new stadium IN the city. I want you to explain to us all how a new stadium in the city create more revenue for the team than a new stadium in OP or Wheatfield or another suburban location?

    Short answer - IT DOESN'T. PROVE TO US IT DOES. Ticket prices and suite prices will be the exact same whether the new stadium is in OP, downtown, Wheatfield, wherever.

    In fact, with less team-controlled parking, the team will likely make LESS money in the city.

    I'm still waiting for someone to offer up a legit reason the business enterprise that is the Buffalo Bills should move into the city. It benefits their bottom line a grand total of zero dollars compared to a new stadium elsewhere.

    Another point... what kind of pricing power do you think the Bills have, people? They can open a new stadium and magically charge an extra $20 for tickets per game (to get in line with league averages) or double the price of suites? Not in this economic climate. The Bills should mimic KC and continually renovate the Ralph. Its the most economically feasible solution at this point.

    Also waiting to hear how you people want to finance a $700 million stadium/convention center.

  54. RonR

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:34

    Sully..looking at a map to the left is DT to the right is a neighborhood that looks like the East side.

    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&time=&date=&ttype=&q=Georgia+Dome&ie=UTF8&ll=33.757403,-84.405556&spn=0.005914,0.013797&t=k&z=17&iwloc=addr&om=1


    View Larger Map

  55. rb66

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:36

    I like what they are doing in Indy. A new downtown stadium with a convention center.

    http://www.footballstadiumdigest.com/news/2006/colts_hks.htm

    DO IT BUFFALO!

  56. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:40

    RonR - maybe you know better than me about the Titans stadium... is right across the river from downtown (where the stadium is) considered the city still? I thought that was outside the city. If it is still Nashville proper, I stand corrected.

    But my point about ample parking remains...

  57. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 16:48

    rb66, RonR, SleepL8 and others -

    Don't get me wrong, I'd LOVE to have the stadium downtown. I just don't think (1) there is enough space without tearing down the MASSIVE Perry St. projects and relocating several businesses (the Colts new stadium not counting the convention center takes up 7.5 acres); and (2) it makes sound financial sense for a new owner.

    If someone can point me to a parcel downtown that could accomodate the size of new stadiums and provide the minimal amount of parking needed for a new stadium, I'd love to hear it. 'Cause right now, all I see is the Central Terminal area and the Outer Harbor.

  58. AtwaterLouse

    1 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 17:00

    Talk of a new stadium at this point is fun and games, not serious. Debating the location of one is even more ridiculously premature.

    Bills beat reporter Mark Gaughan on buffalonews.com, points out that talk of a new stadium is on the wrong track. The main purposes of a new stadium, and reasons that can justfiy taking on the debt for one, would be to increase the number of very expensive coprorate luxury boxes and to enable all ticket prices to be raised. Our ecomony around here just won't support either of those.

    http://buffalonews.typepad.com/billboard/2007/11/kelly-a-stadium.html

    Excerpt:

    ...talk of a new stadium for downtown Buffalo is pretty much irrelevant, as has been written many times. The problem for the Buffalo franchise is not the stadium. It's finding the big companies that will spend $80,000 a year to buy luxury boxes in the stadium. Or how about $100,000 a year? There aren't enough of those in Buffalo, which is why the team is reaching out to Southern Ontario. Ralph Wilson has said several times in the past that if a magic wand were waved and a new stadium appeared on the waterfront tomorrow, it would not significantly change anything for the team. A new stadium is a plus when you've got a long line of companies waiting to pay $200,000 a year or more for 150 to 200 luxury boxes -- as is the case in New York, Washington, Dallas, Philadelphia, Houston, etc. If the Bills got a new stadium tomorrow, could they raise the per-game price for a season-ticket holder in the lower bowl from $55 a game to $150 a game? Hardly. The great thing about Ralph Wilson Stadium, besides the fact it has what may be the best sightlines in the NFL, is that there is no debt on it. A new owner would not have to assume a dime of stadium debt if he wanted to keep the team in Buffalo. That's a plus for the Buffalo market.

  59. WilliamZabkaAllStars

    2 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 17:04

    THANK YOU ATWATER.

    Exactly what I've been saying. All about pricing power, and the Bills simply wouldn't have it with a new stadium...

    ... ESPECIALLY one funded primarily by incurring heavy debt.

    FOLLOW KANSAS CITY'S EXAMPLE!!! Continually upgrade the Ralph year in and year out (start with geting a corporate sponsor) and slowly raise all suite and ticket prices.

  60. TBone

    0 ratings12345
    Nov 8th 2007, 17:14

    William You stole that BCT Bills Stadium idea, from me- give the credit where due. I am glad you like the dream- it would be an instant classic stadium as well as be one of the only ways to pump the money necessary to rebuild the structure. There are lots of positives, but sadly... I think it is just a dream.