Comment of the Day

This is MJWorthington's answer to this story: http://www.buffalorising.com/story/on_the_market_west_village_con
SBROF: "Yesterday, 15:35. I don't think anyone who actually lives in Buffalo thinks it is perfect. There are plenty of things that are negative (just like anywhere) but Heather, while making some valid points also makes some not so valid points. If everyone from Buffalo moved out of the city... then the problems would just move with them.
The invisible boundary that makes up the difference between the city and suburb are not going to stop problems from moving and somehow things that by either tearing down buildings or moving away solves anything is fool hardy. The problem with the city stems from poverty and education. What happens when 180 thousand impoverished, many uneducated, people moved somewhere else in the region... The city suffers because it shares this disproportionate amount of the regions poverty.
The problem is that unlike in other more prosperous cities, we do not regionally share the burden. When cities like Toronto, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Portland etc.. absorb the new suburban growth they acquire the resources to keep the city stable. WNY suffers because people choose to vote with their feet. Move away from the problem leaving fewer people and resources to left to deal with them. What then happens is the state has to step in and try and subsidize the city's mandated programs. This removes the accountability of politicians in the city from the people because they know that money is coming from elsewhere. This also require new churches, roads, schools, sewer, power, cable lines to be built when regionally we still have fewer and fewer people causing EVERYONE's costs to rise.
Assuming you can afford this increase means you can move away from the problem. Those that can't are just left behind. Again how can building new roads and utilities in the suburbs when regionally there are still fewer people be considered a good, beneficial thing. We need to STOP adding infrastructure to our region. And invest where we already have spend the money to build that. That means the city... but that also means the many of first ring suburbs that are sliding down blight road as they become less desirable. "
Had to quote this since you said everything I was going to say and I could not do it better. There is a reason Buffalo gew first, then the first ring burbs then now the 2nd ring ones. It is not because of superior planning etc. It stems from our ability to move away from legacy issues to a nearby place with relatively few all while still getting the benefits of the old established one. No matter how many invisible lines we draw, we are still Metropolitan Buffalo/Erie County. We will have all the ills and benefits of being such a society. But deciding to plop our rear ends in one of the sweet spots does not absolve us in our role in the greater entity/system.
Having a slightly smaller county population now spread over 3x as much land will result in many vacant properties and high taxes to pay for th e infrastructue and services. Leaving all the poor and broken households in one area will exponentially breed crime and underperforming schools. If any of them do "make it" they will just follow the path of all those before them that divested and just moved out. It's a downward avalanche that we seem to be happy running in the front of. We are lucky to have a minority of dedicated people trying to turn things around and build things back up small piece by small piece.
the east side is pretty rough all the way to the cheektowaga border now. I guess the people there can now move to Lancaster and talk about how smart Lancaster is and how it is such a shame what is happening to Cheektowaga.
And no majority here will ever vote for a single gov't and a single mission. All the "T.O's" just want to make sure they are getting their catches regardless of how well the team is doing. Why take the risk of the whole team prospering when its safer to just make sure "I'm still getting mine?"
Buffalo will not be 30sq miles filled to the brim again. I don't think that is people's point. It can be shored back up to be higher quality with a smaller number of people over a smaller area. The city eroded over 60 years due to many factors. It's not going to turn around in 10. Especially being saddled as a subdidized problem corral for the greater metro area, a problem all old legacy cities face in the "mobile" US. Just watch your backs, as the city hollows out, there is only one direction for the "problems" to travel: outward.

As we mentioned in our previous post, we’re in the process of changing the Buffalo Rising site. We’re almost there as we expect to launch the new site on Friday, December 19th.
In the meantime, posting will be light as we log new stories in the new publishing system which will only be viewable when we launch on Friday.
As always, we appreciate our users’ patience as we make this transition but we promise it will be well worth it. With faster load times, a comment view …
Caroline Kennedy was in town for a visit with our mayor yesterday. A possible choice to succeed US Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kennedy's name has been mentioned along with that of Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York Governor Mario Cuomo) and our own Byron Brown, among others.
Certainly, Kennedy has "been around politics" all of her life, which is to say she was born into a family of politicos and lived in the White House--neither of which would necessarily f …
Free light rail rides on downtown's above ground section could be derailed thanks to the Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority's budget mess. That is the news coming out of a Buffalo Place meeting this morning. Facing a budget shortfall and reduced State operating assistance, the NFTA is scrambling for new revenue sources and is contemplating charging for rides along the lengthy downtown pedestrian mall.
Well it is Christmas time in the city and the NFTA helped put people and especially children into the mood in a very festive and fun way. One of my favorite memories of childhood was taking the train downtown with my grandfather. I would gaze out the windows and watch the tunnel speed by. It always felt like we were going a million miles an hour.
Then there was the ability to stand up and walk around during the ride without the need to be strapped down. It was always a fun time … 




Comment Options
thinker
Problem is, the state and local governments, who relaly have a stranglehold on the viability of the region, have placed too many obstacles in the way of growth and rebirth.
And, let's not let Joe Voter off the hook either. This being the day after an election, this region put back basically every imcumbent into office. It's time for the voters to take some accountability. People like Hoyt, Volker, and Schimminger have one thing to havg their hats on... they overseen the perpetual decline and detrioration of this region and this state. Sure, they have their feel good "pork" projects and initiatives that they use to control the voters. Voters see a new park, a grant for $10,000 and a public appearance and ribbon cutting and they falsely think these people are doing the right thing, that they're out for you.
Sorry, but those aren't the issues that matter. Fragmented govt is a killer (as noted in this story); union laws (Taylor law) a as deadly; the 200+ public authorities that have free access to money without accountability to the taxpayers (Peace Bridge Authority anyone?), etc.
NYS government at all levels is populated with self-serving disingenuous people who will do whatever it takes, and take contrubutions from whoever will back them, for the sole purpose of promoting themselves.
But when someone like Kevin Gaughan steps up, he's dismissed and marginalized by the establishment and never allowed to gain any traction (see the West Seneca Town Board's actions). If you're not part of the political machine, you have no saw.
Start voting on records and results and data and not how many times you saw Byron Brown getting his picture taken.
Look no further in Buffalo than the fire union turning down a 20% raise (which is a joke to being with since they're overpaid as it is) for some cost savings concession. The reason WNY and NY is so taxed and so over burdened with the size of its govt is that politicians can't right size. They are stuck contractually agreed upin staffing levels in a lot of contracts. So when the state of Virgina recently laid off 500 state employees to balance its budget and not have to increas etaxes again, we grow our government and add employees and benefits.
But the politicians can cry all they want about unions, they regularly take their campaign contributions and endorsements and vote in favor of their contracts. It just depends who their audience is. If it's a non-union, private sector taxpayer, the line is that we're handcuffed by labor laws. If it's a union rally, it's "we believe in what you do."
The vast majority of my high school and college friends who have degrees are gone. This isn't a place for young, motivated people who want a career and an environment of growth and propserity, low taxes, increased equity in your home, etc.
Quality of life, despite what the rose colored-glasses people on this board think, isn't foreign in other places. Leaving WNY for somewhere else doesn't mean giving up yopur quality of life. So many around here are stuck on geography as hope, when it's false hope.
You can leave today, buy a $200,000 house in NC, SC or GA and pay about $1400 a year in taxes and your home would appreciate in value, your region would grow and be properous, and your quality of life would be great. Here, for $200,000, you'd pay around $6000 minimum for your taxes on your house, your house will very slowly appreciate in value, if you're a private sector employee you have no job security; population will continue to decline I would argue that the quality of life will continue to erode (quality of life is more than trees and nice streetscapes).
Report this
Assaroni
well said
Report this
STEEL
Right on MJWorthington
Report this
Nusch
Interesting analysis on the tax issue. I experienced first hand living in Tennessee that although property taxes are low, service sucks and there are plenty of hiden costs. My property tax bill was probably 4 times less in Tennessee, then on top of that add contracted garbage pick-up (or take your garbage to a dump), fire coverage, street light bill (if your street had street lights), stormwater and sanitary sewer fee, and not to mention the majority of communities are private and require you to pay into association fees (landscaping, brush pickup, private roads, private utilities, etc.). These services are included in my tax bill here. Then figure in the over crowded schools (using portable trailers), the fact that I never saw police on routine cruises, HORRIBLE roads, poor drainage, lack of recreational facilities, lack of building inspections and zoning. Quite frankly what you end up with is a large, unplanned mass of suburban sprawl with no recognizable neighborhoods and no reason to come outside of your house (except to drive your kids to school). In the end, I had a similar priced house in Tennessee (half the size) as I do here, and my monthly mortgage payment, after figuring these costs, if not that far off and in the end, I'm happier because of the services I get.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Nusch - Wow it sounds awful in Tennessee. With things so much worse there than WNY, I wonder how to explain so many more people choosing to locate there by comparison over the past decade or two. Maybe warmer climate is all there is to it.
Report this
truestar
neglect is the word that comes to mind when I think about our city. I drive on pot holed roads streets lined with empty storefronts and pray it will turn around, I don't live in a fancy loft or in an area with a successful concentration of business ...the politicians want my vote to keep them in office but do nothing to remedy the situation ....and the trail leads all the way to Albany....it isn't any suprise that we've lost half of our population and it's another wonder that people stay in New York State at all....now tthat he Democrats are in charge it'll just be a different bunch of people with a different agenda living the good life off of our tax dollars and taxed backs
Report this
Colin
atwater --
Maybe people moved south lured by the promise of a life that appeared better, but was built on a bubble and will prove to be unsustainable? Maybe the low tax, tiny government, every man for himself model will prove less successful in the long run?
I don't know the answers to these questions, but I have my suspicions.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Colin - I don't know either, but it seems the "tiny government" (haha) experiment as you call it has gone on quite a while so if it's all that bad wouldn't we have seen a turn around by now? Last year in 2007 19 of the 20 top 1-year growth metros were all in the south and west. Those 20 in total at that link are the 10 fastest growing in people count (9 of 10 are in south or west, Chicago the exception) and the 10 fastest growing by percent (all 10 of 10 are in south or west), all for the year ending July 1, 2007. If life is so awful, wouldn't that be well known by now and people moving back to WNY? What do your suspicions tell you?
Report this
Colin
atwater --
I'd say give it a few decades and we'll see. The growth of the west and south happened over a period of several decades, and was fueled in part by debt and the movement of jobs from the north and east. We'll see what happens when those debts come due, and those jobs leave Charlotte for Mumbai (or wherever). My guess is that areas with a more developed safety net will start to look more attractive.
Report this
sonyactivision
A big factor in the South's growth is chain migration. A lot of people have relatives that moved down there years or decades ago and have visited and grown to like the area. The mild climate, the convenience and low cost of living drove this migration. And it was unsustainable. What were once younger working age communities in the '70s and '80s, are now increasingly retirees that reduce their spending at the very time that these overextended communities are facing huge infrastructure and health care expenditures. Many factories are now closed or closing and except for a few areas like Raleigh-Durham, the South is experiencing its first full-blown recession since the Depression. And, as in recessions past, working families will migrate either to growth areas or move in with relatives. The bloom is off that magnolia.
Report this
STEEL
I don't think any of you read the opening story.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
Maybe most so far found Thinker's and Nusch's comments more worth a comment than the article's opening story. It happens. Nobody's stopping anyone from commenting on the opening story.
Colin - Ok fair enough - I'll give it a few more decades. It's been a few decades, but I'll give it a few more. If the 2037 trends are still like 2007, then I'll start to doubt your guess.
Report this
Assaroni
Right on THINKER...you said it right...ass backwards here
Report this
georged
Sony-maybe your flawed theory speaks for some Florida retirement towns, but that is it. Cities like Atlanta, Raleigh, Charlotte, Memphis, Dallas, etc are teeming with young people in the mid-20s to 40. If you want to look at a region filled with seniors with no spending power look no furthur than WNY.
Report this
georged
Yeah Colin, and then everyone will be flocking to Buffalo as the promised land. Please explain how the migration south and west was fueled by debt.
Report this
pegger
Is it time to revisit the County concept? The theme about the wealth moving steadily away from the core is the reality. Those with the least resources are the people that get left behind. First ring suburbs have been in decline for decades that is now increasingly more rapid. Slow at first, galloping now. I think it was seven years ago that I had an occasion to check the Ken-Ton Schools website where they mentioned that the system was not what it used to be even though more than half the sites were Distinguished Schools. They cited specifically that the social and economic problems from the city were finding their way into their atendance areas. True no doubt, but unexpected being that I read it in their Employment Oppotunities section. If it was publicly disclosed seven years ago, it must have been a considerable trend by then.
Report this
sonyactivision
I can't think of one city anywhere that ever "shrunk to greatness". Buffalo has to find a way to regain its footing and start growing again and if that means a City-County consolidation, then so be it. Erie County could only exist separately with a strong primary city at its core. Without that you have the same problems Detroit's suburbs are facing: declining populations, job flight, and dimminished gross receipts. They poached Detroit with their lures of lower taxes until they basically killed it off. Now, they exist for their own sakes and are declining. For its part, Detroit had to keep raising taxes to the point thatr few if anybody would ever want to open a business in that city. That there are similar imbalances between Buffalo and Erie County means that resources are not entering the city as they should and that the surrounding suburbs are poaching what wealth comes their way out of the city. Maybe Buffalo should adopt the Hong Kong model: eliminate all taxes and earn its budgetarty purse by selling land.
Report this
AtwaterLouse
sony - Your idea for Buffalo aspiring to Hong Kong's business friendliness is the only suggestion I've ever heard that really would make it grow. It's not something that will happen considering NY state and the voters here and all that, but it's a good idea otherwise.
I don't think metro govt is realistic (even though I'd probably vote for it most other city voters wouldn't give up power), and even if it happened I don't think it would lead to growth because it won't much undo the reasons shrinking has happened.
The word "greatness" is subjective and almost always associated with growing places. The "shrink to greatness" slogan never seemed sensible to me. It implies cause and effect between the shrinking and becoming great, which isn't the point at all. Maybe no city ever shrunk to greatness, but many have shrunk and some of them probably ended up better than others in some important ways.
What could be hoped for about Buffalo is something like "improving despite shrinking". That's not inspirational either, but it's better than what's been happening ("worsening while shrinking") in most parts of the city outside of Buffalo Rising's few favorite neighborhoods.
Report this
sonyactivision
^ Yeah, Buffalo consolidates with Erie County, secedes from NYS, and then eliminates all taxes becoming much like Hong Kong or Singapore. The City-State makes money from the land it owns in the eastside. Imagine the land under one of those telescoping houses being worth $2 million. Nice fantasy, huh? It'd be a hoot to see something like that happen!
Report this