Albright-Knox is Gifted Portion of Contemporary Vogel Collection

The Albright-Knox Art Gallery has been selected to receive a gift of fifty works of contemporary art from New York collectors Dorothy and Herbert Vogel as part of a national gifts program entitled The Dorothy and Herbert Vogel Collection: Fifty Works for Fifty States, which will distribute 2,500 works evenly to one gallery in each state.
The Albright-Knox has had works from the Vogel collection on loan before. According to Ruth Fine, Curator of Special Projects in Modern Art at the National Gallery, who ultimately helped the Vogels to choose the Buffalo gallery as the New York institution, they did so "because of the Albright-Knox’s importance as an educational and cultural institution in your region."
Director Louis Grachos said, “We are indeed honored to have been selected to represent the State of New York. Considering that the best-known aspect of the Vogels’ collecting focus is minimal and conceptual art, this remarkable gift fits perfectly into our collection of contemporary art, and we thank the Vogels for sharing a portion of their amazing collection with us.” The general feeling from those at the gallery is that the collection is "an amazing fit that will enrich what we already have."
Artists represented within the collection include Richard Artschwager (born 1923), Lynda Benglis (born 1941), Charles Clough (born 1951), Larry Poons (born 1937) and Richard Tuttle (born 1941).
Grachos added, “Many of these artists are already well represented in our Permanent Collection, and in this way the gift adds depth to the Collection. Other artists such as Mark Kostabi (born 1960) and Edda Renouf (born 1943) are welcome new additions to our holdings.”
The story behind the Vogel's collection becomes almost as extraordinary as the collection itself.
Here is a working couple who devoted one entire salary (his) to the purpose of obtaining artworks that eventually numbered more than 4,000. Herbert Vogel, now 85, was a postal worker, and Dorothy, 73, was a reference librarian at the Brooklyn Public Library. Starting in the early 60's, they collected younger artists, preferring to buy pieces they could take home with them on the subway.
Many of the artworks in the Collection are drawings, which attracted the Vogels not only because they were more affordable and often smaller in scale, but also more immediate. As Mrs. Vogel has explained, “The artist’s hand is in them, the ideas are there.”
In some cases, works were inscribed and gifted to the Vogel's for birthdays and anniversaries by the artists whom they had befriended over the years.
Fifty Works for Fifty States was launched in April 2008, when the first gifts were made to ten institutions. Twenty institutions, including the Albright-Knox, will receive gifts by the end of 2008, and the remaining twenty in 2009.
This is the third major gift to the Albright-Knox Art Gallery in the past several years, along with The Natalie and Irving Forman Collection, the largest single gift in the Gallery’s history; and the seventy-one works from the Panza Collection that were acquired in July. The Albright-Knox Art Gallery continues to be recognized both nationally and internationally as a place for donors to leave great collections of modern and contemporary art to be enjoyed by future generations.
The National Endowment for the Arts is funding the publication of a book, The Dorothy and Herbert Vogel Collection: Fifty Works for Fifty States, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is providing funds for packing and shipping the works of art to the fifty institutions. The IMLS will also fund the development of a Web site to serve as both an information center and exhibition area for this project.
Dorothy Vogel was born in Elmira, NY, and attended the University at Buffalo and Syracuse University, where she received her BA.

Though it may only be the fifth time since 1992 that the Albright-Knox Art Galley has increased its admission rate, the higher fee speaks to the changing face of our society and economy. To keep the gallery in good financial health, it is necessary to increase the price of a regular adult admission ticket from $10 up to $12. The new price will go into effect on January 1st 2009.
The director of the gallery, Louis Grachos, has said that due to higher costs in all areas of the gall …
French satire from the 1600's feels like falling asleep in high school english class. But classic French satire with a rock and roll band? That sounds better. We can thank Andy Liegl for this bold modernity on December 26th when his production of Such Foolish Affected Ladies opens at the Alt Theatre. The original play calls for violinists but this role has been liberally opened up to local band The Nepenthe. "I wanted an indie rock sound, something that my generation can click wit …
It’s funny how history seems to repeat itself. Florence Foster Jenkins was in the elite member of society, but terribly eccentric and utterly convinced that she was a great coloratura soprano – despite the fact that she couldn’t carry a tune for even a few notes. She even managed to hold a sold out concert, even though she couldn’t sing! Sound familiar? Remember William Hung?
Jenkins’ story happened over 50 years ago. She would hold annual recitals in the Ritz Carlton h …
What could be more perfect to spread the news about local artists at the Buffalo Indie Market than a literary magazine that features works from local artists? NOMAD is a new magazine set to debut in January 2009 that will feature writers, poets, photographers, artists, and designers from the area. Erica Eichelkraut, a freelance photographer, created NOMAD and is bringing it to the public. Since Eichelkraut is a part of the Buffalo Indie Market, it wasn’t long before a collaborat … 




Comment Options
PaulBuffalo
The Vogels and their art collection were profiled on 60 Minutes a number of years ago. They have been known as discerning collectors and I'll be glad to see the fifty works at the Albright-Knox.
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
Sadly, the Albright has its positive reputation in contemporary and modern because it has aborted its classic and period art and the patrons that entrusted the donation of their classical and period art to them.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Buffalo21stcentury, as has been said many times in comments on BRO, the mission of the Albright-Knox has always been as a modern art institution. Most of us lament the loss of the works that received so much publicity; however, if you are not the golden goose willing to make a major donation so the museum can repair and renovate their existing building systems, execute a major expansion with a world-class architect, and increase the endowment for the acquisition of master works, what choice does the museum have?
The Vogels have been known in art circles for years and Buffalo should be grateful that donors, such as these, are not bypassing the Albright entirely.
Report this
Buffalo21stcentury
The mission of the Albright Knox is NOT restricted to contemporary and modern art. They received donations and endowments of classical and period art under condition that it never be sold or deaccessioned (whatever the term).
A group of elitists cannot create a coupdeta and undo the donations and endowments of predecessors for their own personal mission to embellish their resume.
Its wonderful that the A-K was chosen. The problem is not the fate of their contemporary or modern collection but that they are aborting their classic and period art.
Rather than sell their classical and period art, they should take it and the associated endowment and open another museum specific to that type of art and sculpture.
The A-K cannot be a world class modern and contemporary art museum by cannibalizing its classical and period art and sculptural endowment. They didnt receive those endowments for that purpose. If the A-K is to be a world class modern and contemporary museum then it should to it on its own with endowments specifically and shows specifically for that purpose....but not at the expense and sacrifice.
Really, its time for the A-K to split off and create a new museum for its classical and period art and sculpture.
Let them build their new addition....in which case it would perfectly fit their modern and contemporary collection.
At such time it might be wise to use the existing 1910 building for its classical collection under a different name.
Report this
bflorox
From the AK website...
MISSION The Albright-Knox Art Gallery, one of the nation’s oldest public arts organizations, has a clear and compelling mission to acquire, exhibit, and preserve both modern and contemporary art. It focuses especially on contemporary art, with an active commitment to taking a global and multidisciplinary approach to the presentation, interpretation, and collection of the artistic expressions of our times. In an enriching, dynamic, and vibrant environment that embraces diverse cultures and traditions, the Gallery seeks to serve a broad and far-reaching audience.
Report this
fredrico
Buffalo21stcentury,
I agree with you 100%.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Frederico, since you agree 100% with Buffalo21stcentury, can you explain what he/she means by 'classical and period art and sculptural endowment'? There are endowments associated with certain types of art at the Albright? There are monies that can actually be moved around like chess pieces from one institution to a newly-created one? This all reads like nonsense; but, perhaps, I'm not understanding what he's trying to say and I'd be glad if you can clarify.
Report this
EricOak
PaulBuffalo,
Buffalo21stcentury is right here, at least about the damage the museum has done to its reputation, to the museum's orginal directives (which do not limit its mission to "modern" or "contemporary"), and to the community's experience of art. The museum probably doesn't have the funds for a wing or section dedicated to its traditional collection, but the museum has indeed been spectacularly lazy about fundraising in the community. When is the last time you heard of a major fundraising outreach from the AK, like the ones that every other cultural institution has to do? They don't do it--they lament the lack of money in town (which is not true) and then make changes to their own directives to justify their new vision, which has about as much freshness and knowledge behind it as the Fisher-Price Toy Museum.
The AK is what it is--a shrinking entertainment venue. It will remain a pleasant place for brunch and for its permanent collection, when you can find it. But until they get more discriminating arbiters of talent (and better writers), it will remain a stunted place. What Buffalo needs is a new museum for an expansive view of art, not a suffocating sensibility that circles art into periods, the way the AK does. No serious artist thinks in terms of modern or traditional, but the AK has forgotten the meaning of timeless. We need a museum that houses the timeless, and the money I had planned to give to the AK I will happily give to that venture when it arrives.
Report this
davvid
EricOak, is it wrong for me to think that you are just a nostalgic person and that maybe you always see a culture that is losing its substance in favor of something new and cheap? Am I being unfair?-- because when I hear these comments that ask for "period" or classical architecture and art and then Chris69/L rants about the Jews, abortion, gays or illegal immigrants-- I can't help but think that these positions are linked and reflect a fear of change or a fear of new things.
At the moment I'm living in Brooklyn which is filled with neophiles and it sometimes seems like everyone is either a DJ, photographer and/or blogger. It can seem pretentious at times but it also feels very fertile and Buffalo also has a much smaller version of this culture as you probably know. I would think that an effort by the A-K to focus on introducing the latest in art and design works to cultivate a creative and more experimental sensibility locally. Its unclear to me how an emphasis on antiques and classical art would support other efforts to make Buffalo a more fertile and more relevant place for creative people wanting to experiment.
Report this
Bufago
OK I guess as long as we don't get stuck with another pile of crap like the Forman collection.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Davvid, I must come to the defense of EricOak in that I think it's disingenuous to speak of him in the same sentence as the possible former BuffaloWeiner/Chris 69 above. EricOak brings thoughtful comments to every discussion even though I may occasionally disagree with him. I don't have the impression that EricOak is against the new as much as he's against the dismissal of older art forms that can bring a contextual richness when juxtaposed against the new.
I should add that I always appreciate your relevant comments, too. Thank you. Your second paragraph above regarding the introduction of new ideas makes a powerful point. I think back to when Kleinhan's Music Hall introduced new music to a generation of Buffalonians through trailblazers such as Lukas Foss, Michael Tilson Thomas, and Semyon Bychkov. The Albright also has that history of introducing Buffalo to the new, but the Albright, like Kleinhan's, is at a crossroads financially and also has the task of redefining itself for the next generation.
Report this
PaulBuffalo
EricOak, I can't speak to the Albright's fund-raising abilities. Most cultural institutions with which I am familiar target their members and use direct mail to a specific demographic. I assume that the Albright must have utilized those methods, too. Board members of any major cultural institution are, typically, major donors, too, and they use their influence to seek additional donations.
Enough has been written about the Albright's mission historically, so I don't want to add to the old debate.
It's obvious to me that the Albright is suffocating for space. Once the museum expands, more of the permanent collection, including many of the older works, will again be on display.
Does Buffalo need a museum that delves into the breadth of art history? Sure. If someone is willing to fund it, we would all applaud the effort. (If someone wants to liberate the 'ethnographic' art at the Buffalo Museum of Science, that would be a good first step.) Until that time, I'm grateful for what they are able to do right now and I appreciate that the Vogels have enough respect for the museum to entrust part of their collection to it. Buffalo is all about the small victories.
Report this
gaustad
{deleted- flaming}
Report this
PaulBuffalo
Gaustad, then don't read my comments.
Report this
gaustad
{deleted-off topic}
Report this