Comment Options

  1. Drew

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 08:14

    Tinker, I think you are blaming the victims. They have not failed the church, we (the church) have failed them. They don't arrive in the buildings because we don't invite them, or because we provide a liturgy/preaching that does not connect people to God, or because we live lives and make comments that show that we do not have the peace that they seek.

    Everybody's hypocritical. You were able to see it in some of the non-church people, but plenty more can point out our own hypocrisy.

    Here's the good news. Even your comment recognizes that many non-church goers have "spirituality." They are seeking God and a faithful community. They want what we have! All that we have to do is do a better job living it, and kindly share it with the spiritual people that are looking every day.

    And Awater--I got the joke that time, and it cracked me up.

  2. georgethomasapfel

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 13th 2007, 01:41

    Is re-use really as hard as you say? Conversion is expensive, but my guess is that it is worth it in the long run.

    I like that forward thinking.   The real shame--besides the closing of this beautiful church--is that this structure was built by the congregation themselves!  Magnum provided the link in his post above, from that site:  When it was announced that the cost of construction would be $100,000 or more, the parishioners decided to build it themselves. The work went slowly because they had to raise them money to pay for it as they went...the land was donated, and a local contractor provided site preparation and grading.  After eight years of construction in 1886 the entire building had already been paid for except for furniture and furnishings.  From "Houses of Worship: A Guide to the Religious Architecture of Buffalo, New York," by James Napora. Master of Architecture Thesis. 1995

  3. Drew

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 18:07

    Biniskiewz--we should talk.

    My church can relate to what you are talking about. We just tightened our belt again, and still are going into the hole due (mostly) to building costs.

    At the same time, we would never sell and rebuild out in the suburbs. We believe that God put us in the Elmwood Village for a reason.

    Is re-use really as hard as you say? Conversion is expensive, but my guess is that it is worth it in the long run.

    Where I come from (Pittsburgh) Three church buildings have been re-used in glorious ways. See: The Priory thepriory.com

    The Church Brew Works: churchbrew.com/

    An amazing private home: pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_122069.html

    and

    Altar bar: altarbar.com/altar_about.html

    Of course, there are other options. My hope is that our community and building can evolve to meet the spiritual needs of its neighborhood. We are committed to loving God and to loving our neighbors (especially in the Elmwood Village/West Side) and believe that others will want to join us in that mission! I believe we can use our building as an asset for the neighborhood, and that as we do, the neighborhood will value and support the building.

    (Shameless plug: Check out the building and the community within it at elmwoodjesus.org)

    PS. Links were removed because the darn thing wouldn't post. But you can see what the web sites would be. just the www.

    PPS. I would love to add the BR theology tab. Atwater is off to a good start.

  4. jamesbflo

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 14:35

    wow, that church is beautiful!!!

  5. The_other_mike

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:11

    I served as an Altar Boy and Knight of the Altar in a few of churches, including St. Ann's. I recall serving at a funeral for a former member of the Buffalo Diocese at St. Ann's in the early 80s and can vividly recall the beauty and magnificence of the interior and exterior of the church. Like most of the churches, all of the details and ornamentation of the interior was funded by members of the congregation, usually in memory of a famiy member or a leader of the congregation. If you have a chance to worship in this church, or any other, take a look at the statutes, the pews, the Altar, Sacristy, and even the confessionals, are in tribute to someone. The legacy of the community carries on in every one of these elements. Many members of the congregation would save for years to offer their memorium, whenever I visit these churches I am always amazed at the level of involvement of the congregation. It is difficult for someone who is self-centered and selfish to understand the concept behind giving to the church, it is not a form of extortion. I am shocked to hear that someone received a letter from the Catholic Church stating that they were not giving enough money, and I actually find it difficult to believe. In my experience, I have never seen the church turn their back on anyone in need or who was unable to contribute to the weekly collection. Maybe things have changed in recent years, I am not one to say.

    I had the opportunity to attend a few services at The Chapel in Amherst, and the Eastern Hill Weslyan Church in Clarence over the past year. I was thinking that the size of the typical Sunday congregation at either one of these churches would not fit into most of the churches that are being closed by the Diocese. They have perfected the art of marketing their churches. They have captured the 'me first' mentality of most Americans by creating a very informal and casual environment for worship, they have parking stewards, free daycare, and even donut shops in the church so you can sip your latte while listening to God's word. It was actually quite an experience when compared to the formal nature of most Catholic Churches. Like many companies, these churches have adapted to the changing expectations of society by shifting to more casual dress and more convenient (non-football) hours for services.

    The fabric of America has changed, and the Church has remained true to their beliefs and standards. I respect them for that, but they have lost me and many others from my generation in their rigid and dogmatic approach. I don't expect the Catholic Church to change, and I don't expect people to attend services out of obligation. Religion is a personal choice, and people have chosen to no longer attend churches like St. Ann's. If we want to save the church, then we need to attend the church. It is similar to the 'buy American' campaigns. Wishing and hoping that someone else will do it will not change the result. Don't complain about the GM closing the factory as you sit in your Honda or BMW.

  6. Drew

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 20:54

    I know that the "theology" tab was sarcastic, but I'd love it anyway.

    As for "Jesus wouldn't build buildings," you are spot on, sarcastic or not. Here's one of the coolest congregations in the country. http://www.churchunderthebridge.org/

  7. ChocolateShake

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 16:12

    Vacant factories. Vacant storefronts. Vacant houses. Now, we have vacant churches. If we only had more vacant government offices perhaps the afforementioned factories, storefronts, houses and churches would be not so underutilized.

    Time to think about radical change... l

  8. BroadwayFillmoreAlive

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 22:09

    This link is a video/slideshow of some churches in B-F...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtFTKtfoRBg

  9. mmiller

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 11:24

    Thanks for doing this series of posts, Steel. This church is only one of many historic, beautiful and endangered buildings on the east side. I'm so glad that the "Friends of St. Ann" is mobilized and ready for action. If you are inspired by this story, I encourage you to support the efforts of the "Friends" in any way you can!

  10. TDSBLO

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 12:32

    Wow. The detail outside and in looks amazing. I love these gothic churches. Hopefully they are able to preserve it.

  11. BroadwayFillmoreAlive

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 22:07

    There are many cool buildings throuhgout the Broadway-Fillmore neighborhood and the east side withering away...what we have tried to do with Broadway Fillmore Alive is give people a window into the neighborhood on the web...people who otherwise wouldn't think twice about it...heck wouldn't think once about it...B-F along with many other old neighborhoods do hold a lot of hidden or forgotten treasures...can all be saved...probably not...but it is important that we try to do what we can to ensure we don't lose something we shouldn't...

    Report this

  • magnum

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:15

    I've been saying this for years(not sure if I'm correct): Buffalo has more churches per capita that any other major city in the world. Lets confirm this, market it, and let the tour buses come in. Retired people would love a tour like this, money raised would save our churches. Our Church Architecture is an asset I seldom hear in the Press. We would need to weed out a list of our 20 best and make it a 2 day event once a month. Here is a great, yet to be completed, set of pictures that I found online a couple years back. http://www.pbase.com/kjosker/churches&page=all

    Here is another link you might find interesting: http://ah.bfn.org/a/bamch.html

    Other than St. Ann, are there any other beauties I need to see before they close - Help! Thanks in advance.

  • fredrico

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 10:43

    It has been previously posted that "the church can no longer afford to support the churches they have", and I would like to complete that statement with"and continue to support themselves in the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed". I know the church can’t keep supporting all these churches but I also don’t see them making any scarifies on their end. When I was 5 my mother and I came to this area on a boat (legally - through Ellis Island) and moved to a severely poor neighborhood in this area. In our tiny (not much population) and very poor neighborhood, we had a catholic church and a humble priest father Chellino who learned of our plight. Every week ( for seven years ) father Chellino came to our house and brought us powdered milk, butter, flour and cans of hash and I remember once he brought us a turkey. Every Christmas he dressed as Santa ( I think it was him) and invited us to the basement of the church (where the hall was) and there we would receive are only Christmas gifts of a toothbrush and a coloring book ( which we sincerely thought were the most fabulous gifts in the world). Every Sunday we would go to church (all nine of us) because my parents are very religious people and my father would bring one envelope for all of us- in it was one dime. He put one dime in the envelope for nine of us and we never got one complaint from father Chellino or one threatening letter saying we needed to give 10 % of are annual income (like my parents- who are 80 years old- do now from their catholic church). And thus - I learned from father Chellino what the Catholic Church and religion is supposed to be about. It's not about keeping churches where well to do people live open (or at least financially comfortable) while closing the churches where poor, elderly, people without transportation live - father Chellino would tell you all that. And it's not about Bishop Kemic living in a mansion while the poor turn over their social security to help maintain his lifestyle. Father Chellino lived by example by living next door to the tiny church where he practiced his giving (not taking). If you go to the Vatican as I did many years later you will see one of the largest treasure troves of wealth in the world. If the church has to cut back then the Vatican and Bishop Kimic have it all wrong where the trimming needs to take place. Our church - when I was small only had 80 to 100 members at the most and the church was not making money- I am sure - but on the other hand father Chellino understood back then that the church had to support the people - not the other way around. This is the true meaning of a congregation - to sustain the people and the neighborhoods that are not able.

  • Biniszkiewicz

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 09:15

    Lucia: I appreciate the sincerity of your comments. It is misguided, however, to equate the mansion on Oakland with a huge space for public gatherings.

    Perhaps the church Should divest itself of trappings like the bishop's residence (I'm not Catholic, so I don't get to weigh in on that one). But living in a church is wholly impractical. The square footage of St. Ann's is probably triple that of Oakland Place and the cubic footage is probably ten fold the size. A large, cold hall does not a residence make. There's no way to heat it. There's no place to cozy up to a good book, have a few friends for dinner (and donations), watch the game, live in human scale.

    But if you like the idea of living in a church, perhaps you should consider buying one; they're cheap. Right now Ron Alsheimer (Plaza Group) has a beautiful large church on the market in a great location (Edward Street @ Elmwood) for $100,000. It's cheaper than many homes surrounding it. Why not buy that? (Hint: because the costs of repair and of converting it into something practical are quite high).

    Even if it were somehow practical for the bishop to move to St. Ann's, what about all the other churches?

  • mmiller

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 08:33

    It doesn't really matter what/who caused the church closings, does it?. The bottom line is that the city's population is almost 50% of what it was at its peak, when these churches thrived.

    We have a situation on our hands with these empty churches. Post analysis doesn't help. The question is: what are we going to do going forward? That's where the discussion should go.

  • sbrof

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 14:32

    Well they had / have a choice. To worship in a dryvit box next to a subdivision and a walgreens or take a chance and MJ said and really put the word of sacrifice and helping those in need in a place where it is most needed. It is easy to call for donation in East Amherst away from the problems you are being told are borne by us all. But it is too easy to just go home and forget about it. The church should have stood up and said, we made this huge investment in capital, memories to create something worthy of god and worship. It has fallen on bad times, the neighborhood needs our help it is time to come home and become a closer knit religious community. But alas racism or classism, call it whatever you want, still plays its part. They build new churches in Lancaster and let these ones fall. They preach to feed the hungry, clothe the naked while driving BMW's home in suits in the burbs. This is where the church should have stood up. To actually do the job they are talking about, Instead they follow numbers, looking at the bottom line and take the capitalistic approach that the greater good doesn't matter if you are not making a profit. Chop off the bleeding parishes where the most need is and save those that don't want for anything.

    Because in the end this is obviously what Jesus would have done. Run away from the poor and needy.

  • Keith

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 12:57

    The houses are small in this neighborhood while the shared spaces like churches are big and beautiful. This is the opposite of what people expect today. Given this fact is there another way to save these churches? If Marano or some other builder bought all (or most) of the empty houses in the neighborhood, demolished them and built McMansions, would the neighborhood come back? I think it would. This would happen naturally if the city declared the area a low-tax zone or some such thing. Short of that, I don't know what to do.

  • Lucia

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 15:48

    I have been a lifelong beliver in my faith and try to practice my "religion" every day in my actions and deeds. I am very steadfast in my commitment to my religion but I am very disappionted in my church - the catholic church.

    What I don't understand is why can't Bishop Kimiec make a scarifice and instead of living in his grand Mansion- live in this grand church instead? Like fredrico pointed out - the church should be striving to give to those in need - not looking to the "haves" to support the church and scooting over to where those people live and abandon the rest. Everyone keeps pointing out how it's just not realistic for the church to afford to support these " Large churches" in low population areas anymore. But why can't bishop Kimeic move to a church and use the money he is spending to live in the mansion to keep the church open? The church does have the money to support the bishop living in one one the most opulent mansions in this city. The church has the money to garb the pope in Rome in the most exquiste headresses or crowns (whatever you call them) fabulous opulent robes- - jewels are on all his fingers - but hey once a year he goes to ethiopia and prays over the poor childrens heads - so what more do you want? Actions speak louder than words - the closings of these churches are proof of that.

  • jerkface

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 11:17

    4 generations of my family have been married, baptised, and/or had funeral services in this church. In fact Mr.Joya is a close family friend. It's sad to see St.Ann's close it's doors. However, the realities of the current state of the Catholic Church and of the impoverished nieghborhoods in this area are what they are and it's hard to argue the need to close and consolidate parishes. The only hope for this incredible building is re-use. Hard to imagine a trendy club/restaurant investing in this part of the city, but maybe someday. But for now I hope whatever needs to be done to preserve and maintain the building is accomplished.

  • Lucia

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 22:06

    Biniszkiewicz- I have made a very practical and logical suggestion for the saving/reuse of this stunning church -- let Bishop Kiemic live in it instead of the huge mansion he lives in right now. You have said said it is "silly" to get angry at the church for not saving the church (even though via my suggestion they can). You miss the deeper meaning and statement the Bishop could make by making a move like that such as : " I live among the people" I" I live with the poor", "I have saved a masterpiece and a special place our people love", "through my actions, I give to my community instead of them taking care of me" , etc, etc. Just like Father Chellino - from Fredrico's post, each small action can say so much to everyone about what religion and giving really is. HE lived in his church. All our local priests don't have to run around homeless and starving to accomplish this - as you suggested. I know it would save just this church (not all of them) but it would be a start - and it would say so much to the people.

  • Biniszkiewicz

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 16:59

    Churches are difficult spaces to re-use. They are expensive to maintain. They are expensive to convert.

    I sold the church on Richmond and Ferry to Neal Radice a few years ago ($75,000 sale price, by the way. Lots of lookers, few buyers): the United Methodists needed to sell it because the overhead was killing the small congregation which remained. I sold land to same congregation on Virginia near the 190 at which they built a new 6000' church (utterly non descript and pedestrian, but affordable to build and maintain). I sold the former Wilson Farms on Chenango and Mass Ave to a Hispanic congregation because it fit their needs; modern construction is what Every church today is looking for. They all want retail boxes with parking. From small (Wilson Farms was 3,000') to big (former supermarkets are a favorite), it's second generation retail space that most churches covet. Reason? Heating and cooling are reasonable (unlike the old big churches). Maintenance is predictable and far more affordable than the old churches (insulated flat rubber roofs as opposed to slate, for example.).

    In the very best neighborhoods, it's not easy to re-use a church. Elmwood Commons at Ferry (the one with the fire a few months ago) is about as well situated as a church could possibly be for re-use. But even there, rents were low and space was less than ideal. At the corner of Bryant and Richmond a beautiful brownstone was converted to condos, but the conversion was more expensive than anticipated and the experiment has yet to be repeated. The Karpeles foundation has converted two area churches (on Porter/Jersey and Elmwood/North) to museums. Bless them. Neal radice hasn't had the funds to finish his conversion to performance space. I had one potential buyer for that one (before Neal stepped in) who wanted to make it a warehouse. The Methodists and neighborhood weren't wild about that idea. But qualified buyers are few and far between. What exactly do you do with these structures, especially ones like St. Ann's located in neighborhoods which have declined?

    As to the suggestion that the church should tighten its belt to save these buildings: there's not enough belt tightening possible. Starve the priests, pay them nothing and kick them into homeless shelters, there still wouldn't be enough money to maintain these buildings.

    I'm not a church going guy. I have my own spiritual point of view. But it's silly to get all mad at the cahtolic churche (or others) which abandon these properties. Perhaps a stipulation of abandonment should be that the churches must demolish whatever structures stand on the real estate they give up. That way there wouldn't be hulks decaying for decades, dragging the surroundings down (a la Transfiguration). Ashes to ashes and all that. Don't get caught up in the temporal world; the church could return a vacant lot to what was a vacant lot before their presence. While that hardly seems the best solution, what is the realistic use for these white elephants?

  • knowledgedableone

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 11:01

    The Diocese of Buffalo needs to lighten up and loosen restrictive covenants as to the reuse of these important historical structures. By not allowing dance clubs, bars or restaurants to lease or purchase these structures severely hinders opportunities for their reuse.

    To the best of my knowledge, the Baby Jesus was the only one conceived outside the more traditional manner. To somehow indoctrinate religious views into the post-occupancy of these sacred sites is goofy and short-sighted at best. Contrary to popular belief espoused by the church, bars and dance clubs are not satanic in nature in and of themselves. On quite the contrary, these settings promote social interaction and communal gathering that is intrinsic to the sustainability of the human race.

    The Diocese needs to wake up and smell the incense and realize that the stipulations attached to future re-use of these sites are contrary to there ability to achieve longevity and sustainable reuse.

  • Andrew

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 11:04

    I hope the Bishop lives well in his $2Million plus mansion on Oakland Place while this beautiful place of worship falls to rubble just like the Transfiguration Church. Bunch of grabage is you ask me.

  • BuffaloCook

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:08

    Though I'm not religous and don't go to churches for purposes of worshiping, I often visit to admire the architecture. Some of the most beautiful I've seen were on my trip to Russia right after the fall of communism in 93. If the Catholics can't afford to keep this magnicificent example of history open, and I'm betting the city can't, why don't we do what other cities do, and turn it into a space that appreciates its grandeur?

  • MJWorthington

    8 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:24

    I think the chruch lost its way somewhere around the death of Christ. Probably it is because it is ran by humans?

    Every church in the newer burbs is pretty much a commuter church as most new neighborhoods are not allowed mixed uses due to zoning laws. People are driving to begin with so there is no reason they could not spend an extra 15 minutes supporting the existing (superior) church infrastructor and worship along side the portion of society that thier religion claims to hold in the highest regard. I'd bet that they would even gain more credibility and followers by doing this: precticing what they preach. Seems so easy and obvious no?

    Its pathetic. Around 8th grade I came to grips with what the church is: people and money. A mix that is never holy.

    I've walked this neighborhood many times with nothing more than "hello"s thrown my way. Its dangerous times have passed. Worried about your cars? How difficult is it for some parishions to volunteer every week to watch the street? For the most part it is all two-faced b.s. It's more import to worry about everyone saying "Merry Christmas" over "Happy Holidays" than to perseve the churches history and be one with every class of parishioner. God forbid I take the chance to sit next to someone with ratty clothes or a mental issue.

    Though talking to those at St. Ann's (St Adalberts, Corpus Christi, etc) you can't help but to feel insprired. To see that no matter how small, there is still a number or believers deditcated to doing the hard work and sacrifice to see than a building like this that those before them put their time, effort, and lives into is perserved and conitnues to be there for those less forunate to find hope and inspiration in.

    The church should be limiting church expansion. These were all built while the Buffalo region was growing. This is no longer the case. If a Church is too full in Lancaster, Clarence etc find another that isn't so full. Leave the pews for the elderly and families the are more local. The church is worried about there dwindling numbers? I'd rather see a smaller church full of real belivers and doers then a large church full of posers slinging "used car slaesman" pitches my way.

    Some more pics of St. Anns that I took: http://www.flickr.com/photos/underneatheverything/sets/72157601010888746/

  • Dan

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 14:57

    If Church of the Transfiguration is any indication of the fate of St. Ann's, I'm going to be shedding some tears come next August. Thank you for sharing this with us.

  • Auburner

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 17:37

    Realters eat their young!

  • Hopeful

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 15:26

    St. Ann's is truly beautiful. It is very sad to see it being shunted to obscurity the way that it is. Unfortunately, a church of this gradeur is very expensive to maintain if there aren't thousands of people all contributing dollars to pay the overhead. I think that the tragedy is that the church bureaucracy did not foresee---or refused to see and believe--- the steady decline in its congregations and plan for downsizing. Reminds me of the big three auto makers when they were kings of the world and actually reshaped human lives and cities to match the cars they made while making outrageous profits.

    Time has changed everything, including how we all worship. Whether I like it or not, it is what it is. We enjoyed the beauty and inspiration of ornate churches. Now we have to figure out how to make that beauty marketable. Hmmmm.

  • AtwaterLouse

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 17:39

    Biniszkiewicz - I've noticed anyone who says what you did in those final few sentences gets really yelled at. But you're right and I'm one of the people who say it too. I think a lot more people think it, but very few will say it on blogs or in real life. Anything less than saying all churches should be kept standing forever is very unpopular.

    sbof - About "Because in the end this is obviously what Jesus would have done. Run away from the poor and needy." Then again, maybe Jesus also never would've agreed with having such expensive ornate buildings in the first place. Money to build and maintain them is also money not spent on the poor and needy, just as money spent for the bishop's mansion isn't. He might've said to just preach on street corners and vacant lots. Very hard to guess. A BR 'Theology' tab might help sort all that out.

  • MJWorthington

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 13th 2007, 14:14

    A lot of churches were built that way. It's part of what makes it a true shame to just throw them away.

    These were not rich people who built these. They were hard working east side families that put their heart and souls into them. They deditcated their times and talents. To see a group of people just turn and throw away their collective hisotry is quite sad and not at all inspiring.

    Blessed are those who separate themselves from their history and shelter themselves from the poor, for they shall inherit___________ (?)

  • al-alo

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 21:15

    if im not mistaken, the diocese doesnt want the churches converted into bars, retail or restaurants. i may not be remembering that right, but im pretty sure.

    of course that further limits conversion potential. especially because those applications need large open spaces. perhaps fleet feet could have used such a place for expansion. of course a footware store in a church should only sell leather sandals and close before the ccock crows.

  • STEEL

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 15:14

    MJ hits on an important idea. This building is not being closed by the Diocese. Their decision to shutter this building is based on the actions of perishoners who voted to close the building with their feet. Catholics might like to blame the Bishop for this and other closures but it is their own actions which are trashing a valuable piece of our culture and history while leaving behind all the problems of our present day inner city.

  • al-alo

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 08:47

    tinker,

    clearly church closure is directly due to jokes, lymrics and puns.

    teacher says, everytime you tell a religion joke a church closes!

  • MJWorthington

    2 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 14:13

    The pews at St. Anns are actually heated. There are hot water pipes underneath all of them. Toasty rumps for all worshipers!

    People may complain about the size/oppulance of these old churches, but placed among the modest worker homes that surrounded them, they were true testaments to the faith of thier followers. The dedication to their construction, the donations etc are inspiring. As a child they had me truely wanting to believe.

    The "church is not a building" gets thown around to much as an excuse to abandon a troubled area and segregate classes with in the church. If a church is not a building, why not build a more efficient on right next to these? Where everyone can celebrate and spread to the word of god's love to those who pry feel the most forsaken? Who most religions base themselves on. Its just excuses to absolve responsibility and inconvienences. It were not a building, one could just as easily dirve to these churches to worship.

    The cities population may be 50% but the whole county is pretty stable. Where is the justification for closing churches in poor areas that should be the epicenter of the demonstation of faith while building new ones farther out, especially in our car based sociaty? These were all built during population growth

    I can understand not choosing to live amongst the poor, but the not choosing to worship along side them for a couple hours a week is the ultimate true "testament" of faith.

  • TDSBLO

    5 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 12:52

    sbrof;

    I get what you're saying, and I don't know how much money the church pulls in, but if there's not enough people to support a priest and whoever else is needed to run a church, it doesn't seem like they have much choice.

  • Auburner

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:51

    Wow, nice apse... Kidding kidding!

    Great piece Steel and what a shame. Perhaps it could be converted into a museum of some kind? It is certainly beutiful enough! Good advice from you Dad to go visit it and report on it. Thank you.

  • sbrof

    6 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 12:45

    Utter shame... but i guess in a throw away world of Americana things that are meant to last are not valued as high as they should be. It is also a shame that the Catholic church makes its decisions like a business and not like a church.

  • tinker

    3 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 06:22

    It is so nice of you to make jokes about religion and feel so superior because you practice your spirituality. Do you know that you are the reason that churches like this are closing. You want to thumb your noses at religion and feel all enlightened in your "Spirituality", you make jokes about priests and catholics, altar boys and nuns, but you don't see how truly lost you are in the secular world. Church isn't trendy, it isn't cool, it is actually more acceptable to be non-religious than it is to practice. It is a shame that more of you couldn't find inner peace and happiness through God and through the church. You look from the outside and make incorrect generalizations about what happens inside, maybe because you could never free yourself from your own selfishness to open up to God. All I can say is that the profound dissatisfaction is evident in many of your comments and attitudes. You all sound so hypocritical to me.

  • david

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 13:58

    Had the opportunity to help ring the bells last July. Posted about it - The Bells of St. Ann's and linked to an amazing slide show with views from the clock tower.

  • LivingForge

    4 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 12:25

    What amazes me as I look at these pictures is the fact that today most American Christians attend their weekly services in buildings that look more like warehouses on the outside and convention centers or sports stadiums on the inside. I was recently in Houston, TX, a city surrounded by rapidly expanding suburban sprawl, and I saw mile after mile of corrugated metal warehouse churches. I don't wish to pass a value judgement on this (besides the obvious aesthetic one), but rather want to suggest that the sacral architecture seen above is one of the losses of rapid Western, Southern, and all generally-suburban expansionism. That isn't to say that so called mega-churches don't exist in WNY. I seem to remember one being built on Rt 20 in West Seneca/Orchard Park 5 years ago or so. As Ani says, "America the beautiful is just one big subdivision."

    I am not a religious person, but I can say with full certainty that beautiful architecture like this is harder and harder to find today, and is being left behind the quarterly march for numbers and the next biggest thing. It represents a belief in an enchantment with the world, (an enchantment that can be either secular or religious) one that is largely dead today. It also stands as a symbol of what past generations valued - the people who built these churches were not wealthy and often did the work on them themselves - versus our general nation contemporary values - rapid expansion and big development contracts.

  • SLEEPL8

    7 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 11:52

    The post by fredrico is a real eye opener and is such a sad truth. The Catholic Church as a beurocracy is finally suffering its much deserved fall from grace. The orgranization has largely lost touch with its purpose. The church should provide a connection between God and man...The Catholic Church as a whole has used their churches to obtain money and power. It is disgraceful. It is a shame that so many congregations have to lose their places of worship because of the greed of those who should have been serving them. It is sad to see such beautiful buildings be lost but God doesn't need castles to reach people...only people willing to be reached where ever they are.

  • Drew

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 15:51

    I wrote about this on my blog a few months ago: http://estrip.org/elmwood/journals/index.php?u=drew&id=40025

    Those pictures blew me away.

  • Auburner

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 17:38

    Realters eat their young!

  • Auburner

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 00:59

    Well, maybe we can make it into a Casino and keep it there, heck, they already have a bingo liscence (probably). Right predatory area... Why not make a buck for Spitz

  • Auburner

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 18:06

    First of all, if the Vatican were to liquidate all of the art that is in the basement(of which they have no clue to what is there, remember the taps about 6 years ago?) they would be able to sustain such places as well as pay off the poor people who were victemized by preditor priests.

    I am not trying to bring up an off topic but it seems to be evolving into that (my bad).

    The Church has the money, more money than God (pardon the pun). Monuments like this should be preserved!!! Certainly in poor neighborhoods which need the spirit; some blighted.

    Hypocracy if they close such a monument!

  • AtwaterLouse

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 18:42

    Not-obvious-enough satire claims another victim.... uh I mean thanks Drew!

  • al-alo

    1 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 21:18

    not that im a religious cat, but i dont think a theology or spiritual tab would be too out of order. if nothing else, it open it up for me to make endless bible puns, at least for the first 40 days and forty nights.

  • fredrico

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 11:30

    mmiller- It is easier for you to say "life is full of losses and we have to learn to deal with it"- because it is not you (or even me) that is losing their support/congregation - it is the very poor people in those neighborhoods. I feel for them.

  • fredrico

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 15:34

    STEEL It has been pointed out by myself that the scarfices that are being made by parishioners- regardless of the cause/blame - has been ONE SIDED or only made on one end. You have chosen to call this trashing the Bishop? I did not say the Bishop caused this problem. I only said it speaks volumes the way he is chosing to solve it. As mmiller has pointed out : that life is full of losses and one has to learn to live with it". I agree with that and I assume he means on both sides - I am guessing he is including the Bishop and the Pope in that satement? The naked truth is we are being asked to adjust and except loss except for the ones above us (and I can't help that that is the true fact) If you want to call that trashing - I say the facts speak for themselves. How about leading by example - be a role model - live the life you preach. Actions speak louder than words- I see no adjustments on the top (regardless of the cause) only on the bottom.

  • RisingDamp666

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 23:55

    Maybe a savvy developer from Lake Havasu City will buy the church, disassenble it, and rebuild it lock stock and barrel in the Arizona resort.

  • AtwaterLouse

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 23:25

    Drew, glad you liked my comment even if my sincerity was lacking.

    The 'Theology' tab also might be convenient for articles that promote BR's popular secular religions: Orthodox Urbanism, Fundamentalist Localism, Elmwicca, Tielmantology, etc.

  • mmiller

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 09:27

    Beside's "The Church" and the Montante Center (formerly St. Vincent De Paul), the King Urban Life Center (formerly St. Mary of Sorrows) at 938 Genesee is another great example of adaptive reuse for churches. You can read about it here:

    http://www.kingurbanlifecenter.org/default.htm

  • ntdrew

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 01:52

    Im not cathloc, but that is a shame, not many cities in the U.S. have churches like this, but what do we do, shut them down and watch them fall apart.... does anyone else see a problem with this???

  • fredrico

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 10:44

    As I show through my post up above of my life story - there is more being lost here than this beautiful church.

  • mmiller

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 11:35

    Fredrico, I feel for them too. That's why I offered my help to the Friends of St. Ann's.

  • mmiller

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 11:02

    Fredrico, I empathize with your feelings, however, life is filled with losses we have to learn to deal with, just as Buffalo has to deal with its loss of population. That doesn't mean that we can't preserve some of our history through adaptive reuse.

  • Auburner

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 22:51

    http://gothamist.com/2006/12/19/from_church_to.php

  • sancor

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 12th 2007, 11:24

    Spitting image of St.Peter's Cathedral in London, Ontario and built around the same year. I wonder if there is any connection.

  • ChocolateShake

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 16:13

    Vacant factories. Vacant storefronts. Vacant houses. Now, we have vacant churches. If we only had more vacant government offices perhaps the afforementioned factories, storefronts, houses and churches would be not so underutilized.

    Time to think about radical change...

  • Drew

    0 ratings12345
    Dec 11th 2007, 18:00

    Biniskiewz--we should talk.

    My church can relate to what you are talking about. We just tightened our belt again, and still are going into the hole due (mostly) to building costs.

    At the same time, we would never sell and rebuild out in the suburbs. We believe that God put us in the Elmwood Village for a reason.

    Is re-use really as hard as you say? Conversion is expensive, but my guess is that it is worth it in the long run.

    Where I come from (Pittsburgh) Three church buildings have been re-used in glorious ways. See: The Priory http://www.thepriory.com/

    The Church Brew Works: http://www.churchbrew.com/

    An amazing private home: http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_122069.html

    and

    Altar bar: http://www.altarbar.com/altar_about.html

    Of course, there are other options. My hope is that our community and building can evolve to meet the spiritual needs of its neighborhood. We are committed to loving God and to loving our neighbors (especially in the Elmwood Village/West Side) and believe that others will want to join us in that mission! I believe we can use our building as an asset for the neighborhood, and that as we do, the neighborhood will value and support the building.

    (Shameless plug: Check out the building and the community within it at http://elmwoodjesus.org)