Share, , , Google Plus, Reddit, Pinterest, StumbleUpon


Posted in:

Here’s Your Chance to Play “Place That Stadium!”


Where would you put a new Bills stadium? Inquiring minds want to know. Developers at would also like to know. The website is currently looking for feedback from the community as to where people would like to see the new stadium in the future. Call it a grassroots, open-minded, freeform workshop that will lead to some interesting data generated by the fans. The exercise is simple. The interactive website gives people the ability to pick up the current stadium, parking lot and field house, and maneuver them freely on the map (try it out).

“As a Bills fan myself, the idea for this online tool started with my own curiosity and opinions of where a new stadium could potentially go,” said Dan Gigante, partner and digital director at 19 IDEAS. “I kept thinking about where I thought it would fit around Western New York, but I’m a visual person who needed to see these possibilities for myself. Once I had a working prototype, I quickly realized this is a tool many across the region could play around and have fun with.”

The online tool also allows users to pick up and move a number of other stadiums, including Heinz Field (for a modern downtown stadium reference) and Lucas Oil Field (for a dome stadium reference). Visitors to the website have the ability to Tweet their favorites and share with their friends. Or post to their Facebook page in order to promote their favorite ideas. 

“As our name suggests, we’re forward thinking people. But we’re also impassioned Buffalonians. We hope this tool will provide some amusement for locals, expats, and Bills fans around the world who can now have a clear vision for their ideas on a new stadium,” said Gigante. 

The application is powered by Google Maps API, and driven by determined Buffalo programmers who have decided that it’s time to allow everyone to play the game that was originally designed for the elite few. 


Share, , , Google Plus, Reddit, Pinterest, StumbleUpon

Written by queenseyes


Newell Nussbaumer is 'queenseyes' - Eyes of the Queen City and Founder of Buffalo Rising. Co-founder Elmwood Avenue Festival of the Arts. Co-founder Powder Keg Festival that built the world's largest ice maze (Guinness Book of World Records). Instigator behind Emerald Beach at the Erie Basin Marina. Co-created Flurrious! winter festival. Co-creator of Rusty Chain Beer. Instigator behind Saturday Artisan Market (SAM) at Canalside. Founder of The Peddler retro and vintage market. Instigator behind Liberty Hound @ Canalside. Throws The Witches Ball at The Hotel @ The Lafayette, and the Madd Tiki Winter Luau. Other projects: Navigetter.

Contact Newell Nussbaumer |

8089 posts


Leave a Reply
  1. Downtown on niagara street between thruway on/off and south elmwood.  In other words, where the shoreline apartments are and the land behind them.  For those who want to save all or some of the shoreline apts. – that could be worked into the “big picture” design [or whatever].

  2. Railyard at the corner of William and Bailey. Right of the 190 and just a short drive down William to the 90. Close enough to downtown and larkinville and canalside to bring people there but far enough away to not have huge traffic backups downtown or huge seas of parking where there should be development.

  3. I don’t think it needs to be right downtown. I’d rather see it slightly further east on between Broadway and William where it could become part of strategy to revitalize the East Side.

  4. Father Conway Park., up to Exchange St., The Cooperage and a couple of old commercial buildings would have to come down but would be reconstructed along Exchange as part of the entrance to the Stadium. This is an interesting location as far as the industrial fabric all around it and being close to the Sabres and CS. I still believe behind the Shoreline Apts. is the best location and the best for DT and the best fit for a new CC!

  5. Get rid of the perry projects. More than enough space. Already a ton of parking with first niagar center, cobblestone, and now harbor center. Would now make canalside even better, with all types of events people can attend instead of just tailgating every time. Theres a casino for people who like that stuff (not me) a new harborcenter for people to skate. would really develop cobblestone into something great, and improve the old first ward, and this new ohio street project. Then we can fix up some of those old buildings on Chicago steet. I think its an absolute no brainer. route 5 and the 190, 400, 219, 90 and piece bridge are all relatively close by

  6. The original SL Apts. would be rebuilt as hotel, retail, and condo’s, while the replicated ones behind them would be torn down for the stadium complex. Parking right around the stadium would be limited but DT parking and hotels would do well. Niagara St. and the West Side would get a huge boost and you could have big events like concerts with food trucks [not tailgating] at a resurrected LaSalle Park!

    Let’s get real — there are only two places acceptable for a new Bills stadium:  the Outer Harbor, and the NIagara Falls vicinity.
    But there’s a purty new fake Olmsted Park going on the OH — so, the only location that makes any sense is near NF (Note:  inland, NOT on Goat Island.)
    Placing a new stadium in Batavia is simply idiotic — Buffalo can not successfully leverage the region’s largest multimillion dollar entertainment asset by moving from one small ‘burb far away from downtown (OP) to an even smaller ‘burb even further away (Batavia.)

    Besides, if the Bills have to remain in a suburb, it’s better that they be based in a ‘burb that has millions of visitors each year and whose name is recognized internationally (Niagara Falls) — as opposed to one whose name is barely recognized outside Genesee County (Batavia)

    As for the people who continually suggest the Perry Projects should be removed (either for a new stadium or something else — or for nothing at all) . . . smdh . . . I wonder how come nobody ever suggests tearing down housing on the West Side for the same purpose . . . maybe if people there got a taste of having to live out on the street, they wouldn’t be so quick to make that suggestion . . .


  8. sbrof Definitely.  There was a post on here maybe a couple years ago pitching this idea.  It would definitely stimulate redevelopment of unused silos and other industrial site in the area.  And it could bring positive attention to the Buffalo River.

  9. micahh64  Cut it out, the 2 story complex is 75% empty, boarded up, and poorly designed as is the unused green space fronting Exchange St.. Though a new stadium wouldn’t fit on this land we need some new middle class housing in the OFW.

  10. My name is Mina Neidrauer-I was born in Buffalo and lived there from 1921 when I was born until I moved west in 1985.I am still a rabid Bills fan and started watching them at the War Memorial Stadium and had season tickets until we moved away.
    I think the biggest mistake was not putting Rich Stadium in downtown Buffalo!
    What a boost that gives a city when all those fans come downtown to see a game,have dinner after and /or breakfast or lunch before the game and many stay over at a hotel before or after the game.Just look how the economy was helped at the cities that put their stadium downtown.

    PLEASE do not make the same mistake again and put the stadium outside of 

    PS. I live in Portland Or. and there is a bar here that shows all the Bills game and is attended by many,many ex Buffalonians and we all have a great time cheering for them.

    I thoroughly enjoy Buffalo Rising as It keeps me up to date on the city that I love.

  11. Billfan
    re: “What a boost that gives a city when all those fans come downtown to see a game,have dinner after and /or breakfast or lunch before the game and many stay over at a hotel before or after the game”
    Yes, those fans would be a boost after and before a game. All ten days of the year.
    The problem is that the stadium sits empty for 355 days a year. It’s just a big hole in the fabric of downtown amidst a sea of parking.

  12. biniszkiewicz  Thanks buzzkill bill, such the creative city developer as always. Doesn’t any of your real estate buddies want build condo’s or a Wal-Mart near the new stadium?

  13. If downtown, it would be more than ten days a year since it would most likely be used for concerts and as a new convention center. Needs to be downtown

  14. BuildBuffalo
    re: “it would most likely be used for concerts and as a new convention center.”

    No it wouldn’t. A convention center is not an NFL stadium and vice versa. A convention center needs a hall, for displaying automobile shows and hosting banquets. A stadium doesn’t suit this.
    As for concerts: we’re not the market for stadium tours anymore. Toronto is. Demographics.

  15. rockpile38  biniszkiewicz
    re: “Doesn’t any of your real estate buddies want build condo’s or a Wal-Mart near the new stadium”:
    Why would they? who wants to live next to an NFL stadium or its parking lot? Why would Walmart want to be there? To capture fans 10 days a year?

  16. biniszkiewicz BuildBuffalo Does anyone even do stadium tours anymore?  I thought those stopped with Dave Matthews and the last time the Stones went around.

  17. most reasonable locations in no particular order:
    1); between 198, amherst & tonawanda streets – theres nothing there, tear down or redevelop the ‘river lofts’ building as a parking garage, can fit a stadium & field house. + add rail line/events station along side existing rail line that leads to downtown FNarena events station.
    2); nothing here, an existing rail line not certain if still operational, can install events rail-line, some work would be required to reroute road access.
    3), plenty of parking available downtown already.
    4); eyesore, pretty simple explanation.
    5); at least two city blocks of empty space + chances are most homes around here are dilapidated.
    6); loads of road rerouting would be needed.
    7); loads of dilapidated housing could be bought out and razed. field house could be incorporated into masten park.
    8); existing rail can be replaced with new rail, would be cool to get off in central terminal where there could be bills store, maybe a pregame broadcast show, other attractions, would allow for rail in use to continue operation.
    9); along tiff street, theres not much of anything here but a nice park.

  18. biniszkiewicz  I understand your points and point of view. Another con would be, what would be done with a huge empty stadium and all that surface parking lots in OP. But on the other hand get creative and make the stadium complex an urban experience with NFL themes, a museum, and retail as the train takes you there and the other adjacent attractions as you park n ride . And a massive stadium isn’t a big enough hall for displaying automobile’s? I’ve said time & time again, retro fit the stadium for Bison Baseball, even if you tarp the upper deck, people would pay $10/15 extra bucks to go. Ink one major Bowl game a year, and a MLS team would be pretty radical, again you would have to tarp the upper bowl with advertisement signage, but it still gets butts in the stands. And the Minn. Vikings are still building theirs and they got awarded the 2018 Super Bowl, so that means Buffalo would get a Super Bowl soon after it gets built.

  19. biniszkiewicz Billfan  I agree, although I would argue that lots of businesses depend on those few capacity nights a year when events are going on and there is a surge of activity downtown. Those extra ten days of excitement also happen to fall in the slow season I’d imagine, so it’s nothing to scoff at either.

  20. As I’ve said all along:
    1. Outer Harbor on the Freezer Queen and Port Authority site with Tully’s amphitheater at the other end by the Pier.
    2. Shoreline Apartment site.
    3. Perry Corridor
    4. Exchange St. east of Coca Cola Field between Hamburg St. and Ellicott St. 
    It has to be within a radius of the downtown core, period.  Forget all those silly outlier ideas.

  21. biniszkiewicz BuildBuffalo  “A convention center is not an NFL stadium and vice versa “. Not entirely true. Lucas  Oil stadium is across the street from the Indianapolis convention center and provides for an additional 180,000 sq feet of exhibition space. Brings the total exhibition space to approx 750,000.

  22. I still hope a Golisano type of owner, intent on keeping the team here, will take a look at the Ralph and the numbers and say: it’ll do.
    The big impetus to build a new stadium is revenue. Without the corporate base, the licensing fees, box fees and higher ticket prices can’t be supported.
    If you listen to Russ Brandon and even Cuomo, there seems to be a lot of caution about the cost and revenue from a new stadium. Yes, there’s lots of political support for the Bills. But there is also some distinct cautioning about the feasibility of a new stadium.

  23. OldFirstWard
    Cuomo, for one. He’s said any new stadium would have to be primarily privately financed and the feasibility of a new stadium has still to be ascertained.
    And the voice that stood out to me mostly wasn’t a politician, it was Russ Brandon. In an extensive interview on GR550, he was very focused on and supportive of all the improvements being made to the Ralph. He made a number of statements during the interview suggesting that the need for a replacement stadium has not yet been determined and the financial wherewithal of the metro area was somewhat constricted, perhaps making a new stadium not feasible. He suggested that perhaps the Ralph might suffice down the road, too.
    As for ‘one going with the other (retaining team and new stadium)’: Maybe, maybe not. Depends primarily upon the ownership and what they’re willing to use for a stadium. In the case of someone whose purchase is primarily aimed at the civic benefit of retaining the amenity in Buffalo, the new stadium might not be worth the investment.
    As for the sale of the team, that is completely separate from any negotiations for a new stadium. The presumption is that the new ownership group will insist on a new stadium. And maybe they will. But the vote by the NFL to accept a new owner won’t have any contingencies for a new stadium attached to it. And if that owner doesn’t require a new stadium, the NFL won’t be able to force it.

  24. Funny how people have no issue plopping a massive stadium over existing residential neighborhoods on the East side but it’s not OK to redistribute the McCarley gardens residents to expand the medical campus.  #anythingfordabills

  25. rockpile38  grad94 biniszkiewicz Billfan Every other city? is that why both NYC teams play in Jersey? or Miami way outside their downtown?  I’m sure the majority are not in their downtown proper either.

  26. brownteeth There are areas on the east side with blocks of open space. Also, I see a big difference between buying  10-20 houses from homeowners across a few sparsely populated blocks versus forcing out an entire community of tenants.

  27. Davvid brownteeth
    I see a big difference as well.  McCarley Gardens is a federally subsidized development.  The 10-20 homes on the East Side are not.  
    Why is it so insulting to suggest that those who live in subsidized housing work inside of the construct that what is best for the community should be considered with equal weight to the personal preferences of the residents? 
    HUD requires that residents in subsidized housing be moved to equal or better units if a relocation happens.  It’s not like these people are going to be kicked out to the curb.

Leave a Reply