City February 21, 2013 9:15 AM

Historic Residential Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program to be Extended

Historic Residential Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program to be Extended

Last week NYS Assemblyman Sean Ryan announced that Governor Cuomo has included an extension of the Residential Rehabilitation Tax Credit in his amendments to the 2013-2014 Executive Budget Proposal. The residential historic tax credit allows individuals to receive a tax break for improving historically significant buildings or buildings in historic districts.

Before this announcement, the residential tax credit program was slated to expire at the end of 2014. The program enables owners of certified historic residences to take advantage of a state income tax credit of 20% of costs of improving their historic home. The owner of a home (individually listed in the National Register or part of a National Register district) located in an eligible census tract who undertakes pre-approved improvements costing more than $5,000 is eligible for a state income tax credit of 20% of the costs of rehabilitation, up to a credit of $50,000. At least 5% of that cost must be spent on the exterior, i.e. re-pointing a porch or having the roof replaced.

Thankfully, the tax credit program for historic homeowners has been extended to 2019. If the program had not been extended it would have automatically reverted to an earlier version. The earlier version of the program would only allow for a few neighborhoods to be eligible and would be limited to the amount of tax credits the state would provide. Additionally, if the program had reverted to the earlier version, the newly designated Elmwood Village District would have become ineligible for the tax credit benefits.

Governor Cuomo's proposed extension will avoid those problems, and the extended tax credit program will allow people to plan for future improvements, generate economic benefit, and ensure the stability and long term existence of historically significant areas.

"Extending the Residential Rehabilitation Tax Credit will allow homeowners with historic property to move forward on important projects that create good jobs for our local economy," said Ryan. "Western New York is home to many historic structures that can be transformed, renovated and brought back to life. The extension of this tax credit will help to preserve our historic structures, reduce blight and improve homes throughout the Elmwood Village East District."

View image

Comments

Leave a comment


In the same way that we need to reform the federal tax code to eliminate subsidies and loopholes, we also need to reform the state tax code to eliminate these ridiculous programs that (with the best of intentions) do little more than produce a photo op for a politician.

Rather than making the code more complicated and convoluted, we should simplify it so that we can afford to lower rates across the board for everyone.

The alternative would have a more catalytic economic impact (in being less of a disincentive to investment for everyone), and would be far less expensive and buraucratic a system to administer.

Score: -2 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


An easier way to achieve the same objective of this obscure long-standing tax credit program (that clearly hasn't been having the magnitude of impact that would meet the magnitude of the city's housing challenges), would be to eliminate the property tax's investment penalty.

Eliminating the property tax investment penalty would require no "historic certification" process, would decrease labor demand for tax assessors, and would require no application and/or board approval.


http://changebuffalo.org/taxes

Score: -6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not sure what you're driving at here, but it almost seems as though you're implying the historic homeowner tax credit program is useless. I can assure you, that is certainly not the case. Those people who own a contributing structure in a National Register historic district that utilize the program are maintaining the unique and beautiful architecture that makes Buffalo distinctive.

When the Hamlin Park neighborhood is up for consideration for listing this March and the subsequent adoption of the nomination, it will enable a massive east side neighborhood to keep up their historic properties in a fashion that is appropriate given it's designated status, while also aiding those who normally wouldn't be able to afford such improvements. A $10,000 roof quickly becomes an $8,000 roof utilizing these credits.

My apologies if my response is off-base to your comments here. Perhaps you'd like to clarify?

Score: 14 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not saying it's a useless policy. I'm saying that better policy can have a bigger impact on improving housing in a way that is less discriminative (like eliminating the property tax investment penalty for everyone).

There is the issue of effectiveness. Making a $10,000-upfront roof cost $8,000 on the backend hardly meets the magnitude of the housing challenges in this city. It's a drop in the bucket, motivated more out of a desire to produce a photo op for Cuomo and Ryan than to fix the problem.


Then there is the issue of fairness. Why should only some homeowners have access to home improvement tax credits? Why only for homeowners who can afford to live in a historic district or in a house upon which elitists (with all their prissy sensiblities) are willing to bestow the moniker "historically significant".


I'm very much a preservationist and would fight to save historic architecture, but to craft policy that, by design, is intended only to help some homeowners and not others is discriminative.


Eliminating the property tax investment penalty would give every homeowner the same incentive, and would not discriminate based on which neighborhoods Sean Ryan and Andrew Cuomo think are worth saving, and which are being defacto-red lined in this manner.

replied to Mike Puma
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, I see your point now. Thanks for the clarification

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

On the same note why give millions and millions to wealthy developers? Why should the city spend millions on a water front restaurant? Is it all money going to people that have connections?

I do live in Allentown. I don't make a lot of money so for the most part I can not take advantage of the tax rebate. I spend maybe 3-4 thousand a year on the house not spending the 5 grand to qualify. I'm hoping to re-roof in a year or two and then I may finally make use of the rebate. One of the problems is that you have to let the State into all of your "business" to qualify. Plus like mentioned if you improve your residence it is worth more which raises your taxes. And higher taxes will be then end of me living in Allentown.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm making two points: 1) this policy is ineffective, because it is offering a tax credit that is too marginal to be an incentive unto itself, in a way that further complicates an already too complicated tax code; and 2) it is discriminative against homeowners who do not live in a historic district or do not own a house that elitists view as worthy of improving.

replied to Mike Puma
Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sorry, I didn't mean to post this same point twice. I posted a response (above) but it took a couple mins to post, which made me think I pressed the wrong button. Anyways, sorry for the duplicative point.

Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a great program that has only begun to produce some great results. Kudos to our legislators that seem to understand (in this one instance, at least) what the city needs, at long last.

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

can renovations from 2012 be retroed into the 20% income tax credit..

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'd need to know more information to give you an accurate answer, feel free to email me at mike.j.puma@gmail.com if you don't want your personal details on here. Thanks

replied to elmdog
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

From what I've read I don't think so. I had similar questions after I did my kitchen. The State wants before pictures (like 6 angles) plus all your bids. Then after photos etc.

And they do say that " All work must be approved by OPRHP prior to start of construction."

But that doesn't mean you can't try! Ya never know!

replied to elmdog
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you own a home in a historic district and do not have glass block basement windows and vinyl windows instead of "historic approved" wood trim windows, are you penalized for not meeting the "historic standards"? It seems that this could hurt low-moderate income homeowners who don't have the matching 80% to spend on improvements on their homes...

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you live in a historic district that is designated at the local level, work like you mention must be reviewed by the preservation board. If your district is a National Register listed district ONLY any work you do to your home is your own business and only subject to local permit review. However, if you opt to take advantage of the tax credits there are certain guidelines and standards that have to be met. If you decide not to use the tax credits, you can do whatever you like with your building and the state or feds will have no say since you are not utilizing the program.

Cliffnotes:

1) Use the tax credits = have to comply with Department of Interior Standards for Rehab

2) Dont' use the tax credits = do whatever you like with the building, minus any necessary local review or permitting you would need regardless

replied to punchthroat
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for the clarification!

replied to Mike Puma
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Re: Matt's comment of elitist homeowners getting a break - many of the historic districts are very diverse neighborhoods with that diversity including economics. Indeed, those who have lived in historic neighborhoods and continue to do so after an area has been deemed historic are now faced with higher repair and replacement costs. In fact, our elder neighbors in these areas are, regrettably, some times forced to sell and move.

Years ago a Gap Fund was proposed to assist moderate- to low-income homeowners in these districts but a group of preservationists, most living outside of city limits, disapproved of the concept and it was shelved.

As an example, I provide you with one of Steele's favorite dwellings in the West Village - http://archives.buffalorising.com/story/my_favorite_buildings_frosting -

The owner is quite elderly and has not been able to make repairs due to high costs associated with historic structures.

Elitism? No - just a sound practice and advantage for those who are economically disadvantaged.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Saying one particular building or neigbhorhood deserves tax credits but others don't it extremely elitist.


You're saying that people in Allentown or the Elmwood Villiage deserve to pay lower taxes for improving thier properties, but people in Blackrock or South Buffalo or Lovejoy don't deserve those same tax rates.

It's just an opportunity for one group of people to be snooty towards another group of people, all the while the politician laughing his way to the bank.


Tax credit programs like this should be illigal, just as they should be in the commercial real estate sector.


End the loop holes and deductions so we can lower rates for everyone.

replied to M-Rodgers
Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I believe the difference is this. Example - In Allentown or Elmwood they would spend the money to actually by proper spindels when doing porch repairs. In Black Rock and other such area's they tend to buy cheap decking wood. Sooo, when purchasing the proper materials one spends more and deserves the break as they are actually doing restoration, not, "this will do". Like anyone in Black Rock or the East Side would actually spend 50 grand on home reno is laughable ( or even 500 for that matter)

Score: -5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"like anyone in Black Rock or the East Side would actualy spend 50 grand on a home reno is laughable (or even 500 for that matter)" I have invested far more as have many of my neighbors, all without the benefit of the tax credits that just became available to our area last year. There are many homes and buildings along Niagara, Amherst, and Dearborn that have been fully restored using only private dollars and sweat equity. Some of these are now included in the historic district or individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. I would add there are similar efforts underway on the East Side. Your comments are not only negative but obviously uninformed.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Less than a 90 second walk from my front door is a entire street which will qualify for these credits. Those houses are all at least 20 years newer than on my block, they sell for 3-4 times as much, and the average income is obviously much higher than on my block. Yet, none of my neighbors qualify because of an arbitrary line on a map. Fair?

"Fair" is something that's held every August in Hamburg.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I see the Historic Tax Credits as reparations for decades of government policies that undermined and greatly damaged our old urban neighborhoods. I do agree these credits favor those on the wealthier side as the average working class homeowner here in Black Rock is unlikely to spend more than 5K and is also likely to provide their own labor. That said the credits do indeed spur investment in areas that might not otherwise see activity and also encourages neighboring owners to improve their properties.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just so I am straight here, let me see if I have this correct:

Tax credits for private home owners to improve or rehabiliate private property are good, but tax credits for private businesss to improve or rehabilitate private propertly are bad.

Did I get my BRO talking points correct?

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You have that backwards, private homeowners qualify only for the state 20% tax credit while income producing commercial and rental properties get to double dip with the state credit of 20% and an additional federal credit of 20%.
Our government continues to cater to and subsidize the so called "private sector" to a much greater degree than private citizen homeowners.

replied to Slu
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So let's say you own a home in the Parkside neighborhood. The Parkside Community Association (PCA) has a Century Home Plaque Program.

http://www.parksidebuffalo.org/plaque

They'll research your home to figure out whether it's one century old. If it is, they'll create a plaque. Would this be something you could use to apply for a program like this?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Many houses on Arlington Park have plaques as well. Anyone have insight on those in Allentown? I've never noticed it on the Allentown Association's page.

replied to Martha Red
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The age of a house does not in itself qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register. The requirements are that the property be at least 50 years old and meet at least one of four criteria as to significance. 1. the property is associated with an significant event in history. 2. the property is associated with a significant person in history. 3. the design/construction exemplifys a style or period of construction. 4. the site is of archeological significance or potential.
Most Historic Districts and individual listngs fall under category 3 (design construction).

replied to Martha Red
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

plus the residence must be located in an eligible census tract:

http://nysparks.com/shpo/tax-credit-programs/documents/NYSITCResidentialTaxCreditFAQ.pdf

at the tax credit meetings i went to, i recall being told that parkside was one of the only neighborhoods in buffalo that is not an eligible census tract because incomes are too high.

so much for ricchiazzi's claim that only elites benefit from the tax credit program.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That is correct concerning the tax credits, I was speaking only to inclusion in the National Register which is not related to the census tract requirements.

replied to grad94
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Elites" is not the same thing as "elitist".

The program is elitist in it's structure, motivation, and application. But I did not say that "only elites benefit from the tax credit program".

We don't have elites in Buffalo. Only elitists.

replied to grad94
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

usually conservatives approve of high standards.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The program is a tax expenditure because the state legislature and for the federal program, congress, has determined that the rehabilitation of historic buildings is a public good. This is no different than providing preferential tax benefits to those who purchase houses or get married. Are you against all tax benefits or specifically this one?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment