Real Estate January 24, 2013 12:00 AM

Wegmans Showing Plans for Amherst Street Outbuilding

Wegmans Showing Plans for Amherst Street Outbuilding
Wegmans is looking to construct a stand-alone building in front of its Amherst Street store.  The 15,000 sq.ft. single-story building is expected to house a "high-end wine retailer."  Preliminary plans were shown at a  Black Rock-Riverside Good Neighbor Planning Alliance meeting last night.


wegmans3.jpg

Wegmans site development manager Dan Aken says the supermarket is hoping that a high-end wine retailer will become a tenant in the new building. 

The grocery chain used this model in Rochester to allow Century Liquors to have a location near their store. Wegmans cannot sell liquor, per New York State law.

Many of those at the meeting had no problem with a new liquor store, but some thought the design looked too suburban.

Grant-Amherst Business Association President Mark Kubiniec said, "Well it could be a good proposal for the neighborhood. We'd like to see a true urban building with two stories, mixed use, like would be required under the city's new Green Code."

"We don't want to emulate Sheridan Drive. Sheridan Drive is great for the suburbs, but it's not great for Amherst Street," said Buffalo Common Council member Joseph Golombek.

wegmans2.jpgwegmansamherst.jpg
Company officials are scheduled to outline their plans to the City Planning Board on February 26th.   Work on the new building could start this fall.   In October, the City approved a 1,625 sq.ft. addition to the supermarket's Market CafĂ©.  That expansion is expected to start in March.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Tonight while shopping at Wegmans, I just happened to ask the cashier if she had heard anything about wine sales ever coming to Wegmans. We proceeded to discuss it but she knew nothing. Now I see this. I hope it happens.

I was describing to her that for many years now in California, you can turn the corner in the store and it is a complete liquor aisle. But not in stupid NY. Stupid regulations.

Score: 3 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wine sales are not actually coming to Wegmans or any grocery store, that is why they have to build a seperate store to house the wine and liquor store. On top of that they will more than likely have to buy out an existing liquor store and move the license there as I believe multiple NYS Liquor licenses are still illeagal. Wegmans has found a way around that however

replied to Old First Ward
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, I personally disagree here and support small businesses. I'd rather have the small neighborhood business than a big retail outfit out of another city.

Score: -3 ( 35 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My God! It really is not that hard. How does anyone look at those drawings and conclude that they are a good idea?

Score: -14 ( 52 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A bad idea for Gates Circle, which has been booming since Premier moved farther out of town !

replied to STEEL
Score: 6 ( 24 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Gates has been booming because they run a great business - the staff is smart and helpful - and they have put thought into their expansion and the selection. Yes - Premier's departure has not hurt - but they have earned their stripes all by themselves.

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: 26 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've had bad experiences with Gates Circle. They refused to exchange a couple bottles of wine that were bad (before I opened them), even though I had a receipt, claiming that NYS would not allow any returns or exchanges, no exceptions. Funny that Premier and City Wine will stand behind their products, and if they sold a defective product, they would replace it.

replied to bydesign
Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A couple years ago at during Christmas holidays, I was parked right in front of the Great Arrow Wine and Liquor store while my brother was inside purchasing some wine.

As I watched, a lady was preparing to exit the store with a couple bottles in hand while someone was coming in at the same time, I believe one of the two doors were locked, the lady stepped back but the incoming customer knocked one of the woman's bottles out of her hand with the door and it broke inside the store in the doorway. I then watched her fighting with the clerk because they did not want to replace the bottle claiming it was her problem.

What a way to lose a customer.

replied to Greenca
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am not talking about the buisiness

replied to MrGreenJeans
Score: -1 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I see by the down votes that some think this is a pretty nice design!

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's a wine store on Amherst St. in a parking lot. It has as much design as the location deserves.

replied to STEEL
Score: -3 ( 33 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unfortunately your attitude has been applied to the entire metro area and it shows. Let me know when you find someplace that does matter.

replied to longgone
Score: -3 ( 37 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me know when you move to Buffalo to experience it on a daily basis and stop comparing architecture of Chicago to middle class neighborhoods in the 3rd poorest city in the United States.

replied to STEEL
Score: 8 ( 42 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So you have deluded yourself into believing that this is the best that can be built in Buffalo? Really? Maybe it is the best if you accept it as the best. Or maybe , just maybe you can expect more and get more.

It is kind of funny how you trot out that misleading poorest city line to apologize for the design of a building meant for housing and selling a luxury product which is designed to mostly to accommodate people with expensive personal transportation machines. Poor folk don't need no good design - just give em their booze and they will shut up.

By the way - if you want people to move to Buffalo, building crap like this is not going to help that much to meet your goal.

replied to longgone
Score: 9 ( 33 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Of course this is not the best that can be built. It is however, a reasonable build for the site and neighborhood. Sure it would be nice to have a timeless structure that was the anchor for this section of town...but is that a reasonable request? I honestly don't think it is.

I just watched the video regarding the reaction to the design. I found it amusing because only one building actually meets the design standards or goals for this section. That is the Dog Days building...which is awesome.

They request 2 stories and mixed use but there are multiple commercial structures on the street that are single story/single use.

It's also comical to suggest that a grocery store chain go into the housing business to fit some desire to build out a neighborhood that's not going to ever be built out like indended.

They request the build not look suburban, yet they have newly built section 8 housing directly across the street that is both setback from the curb, a single story and a perfect example of suburban style design.

I mentioned that this was a middle class neighborhood, as well as, the reality of the poverty city wide. The reason I did this was to provide perspective on what middle class looks like in Buffalo.

The only reason why this is getting discussed like this is because Wegmans is behind it. If this was just a local shop..nothing would be said.


So let's back up the conversation...

Just what issue do you have with the design. Is it the exterior materials? Is it the windows? Is it the location of entrances? Do you desire for Wegmans to go into the housing business with a mixed use building?


replied to STEEL
Score: 2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I did not say anything about mixed uses. This is crappy architecture even if you added another floor. There is no excuse and no, poor neighborhoods don't need to accept crappy buildings.

replied to longgone
Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So what kind of building are you expecting?

Can you describe it? Can you link to an example?


replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How hard is it to put the door facing the sidewalk instead of a big empty wall?

replied to longgone
Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Having a door that opens to the front would open to a public sidewalk. Having a door that opens to the side or back would open to private property.

This store is next to a bus stop and directly across the street from Section 8 housing. I am not making any judgements but there is some good logic there to not open to the street.

replied to JSmith
Score: -10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Every door on the street opens to the public sidewalk, that's how cities and towns are designed. Same for the bus stop, public transportation brings people to a business, that is good logic. Finally, to my knowledge that is not Section 8 housing across the street but a group home.

replied to longgone
Score: 10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The housing is Geranium Housing, which is Section 8.

http://section-8-housing.findthebest.com/l/5421/Geranium-Housing

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My mistake on the Section 8, of course this particular building is limited to the disabled and the elderly, I don't see how that can be a detriment to the area or threat to the store.

replied to longgone
Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

don't you live in California?

replied to longgone
Score: 6 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"as much design as the locatin deserves", please explain, if this store was say in Williamsville would it "deserve" a better design?

replied to longgone
Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If built, this store would be one of the nicest properties on this stretch of road. It does not have boarded up fronts like several properties in the vicinty.

The design is reasonable for Blackrock. Extract from that what you want.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Many of those boarded up storefronts have been being uncovered and repurposed in the last few years. Amherst St is one of the city's most up and coming areas with new business continuing to discover the street. I would venture Amherst St has attracted more new business than any other similar sized street in the city. Finally, Amherst street is full of quality architecture, especially west of Wegmans and all the way down to Niagara St. New builds should reflect that quality and compliment it.

replied to longgone
Score: 10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

New is not the same thing as nice.

replied to longgone
Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a horrible design.
(I've been on vacation, just got back)!

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Hoping that a high end liquor store becomes a tenant".......and when it doesn't it will be filled in by a tanning salon, dollar store,Cricket store...or something else of that ilk....I don't like it, bad idea

Score: -11 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think in this case. Wegmans probably already has everything figured out. At least this adds a store front to Amherst, obscuring the massive parking lot behind it.

replied to ivan putski jr
Score: 23 ( 25 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I doubt that Wegmans would build a store on speculation. Of course the wine store tenant is already lined up and committed.

replied to ivan putski jr
Score: 12 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I must be missing something as to why this is such a horrible design. Sure, it doesn't have mixed use but it's built to the curb, replaces useless greenspace, and appears to have massing close to a two-story building.

Score: 10 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't worry, Gates Circle...you're right on my way home after I pick up groceries at Wegmans. You still got my business!

Score: 7 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If they modify it to put a second main entrance on Amherst St. then I am good with it. A building built up to the sidewalk with stores in it is much better than the grassy berm there now.

Would love to seem them build it tall enough to eventually house a second floor after remodeling sometime down the line, but overall, I'm happy to have a commercial building built roadside.

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just put the entrance at the corner so it can serve both the lot and the street.

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The designer should check his scale...the site plan doesn't depict the actual dimensions of the site. It shows the 'green space' as almost square when it's very long and narrow (see aerial). The elevations are correct- it will be a narrow building (upper left elevation faces east towards the new parking area, upper right is the Amherst Street elevation).

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

would be nice to see how this whole strip along Amherst fronting Wegman's could be built out in the future and how this building fits that vision.

This appears to preclude what could be a good model for this and other sites - retail/ mixed use fronting streets and parking lot behind associated with large retailer such as Wegman's behind.

Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Large grocery stores sell beer and lots of varieties, and yet many people still buy beer at smaller convenience stores. So why is it a problem in NY State to allow wine and spirits in the grocery store? To save the small liquor store? Most supermarkets are already established throughout WNY, and they are not rushing to build more. So if a small liquor store wants to open for business, plan your location accordingly. Competing means adapting, and this also includes where you are located.

I support small businesses as well, but if I can buy the product for a lot less and in larger varieties I think it is my right to do so. Wegmans is cheaper than Tops on most everything but the drive to Wegmans is a lot further than my drive to Tops so sometimes if I need a few items I'll pay a little more by stopping at Tops to save time and gas. Buying spirits would be no different. Not allowing liquor and wine in supermarkets is subsidizing the liquor store industry. In NY, probably a lot of other things we are not even aware of.

Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No more buildings that put their side walls right up against the sidewalk). The front door needs to face the sidewalk.

I agree with nyc - we should encourage in-fill along the main streets in front of big retail centers like this one or along Delaware or Elmwood. Have traditional mixed use buildings facing the street, a driveway that gives access to the big parking lot in the rear, and then way in the back you can have Wegmans, Target, etc.

Score: 12 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i love how the same people comment on here and every one in buffalo thinks that they are an archictect. shut up !! delete!

Score: -9 ( 25 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This site plan looks horrible. It should help boost Amherst street "main st" walkability by putting all parking in the back and Main entrance towards the street. This building doesn't really even need it's own parking lot if they could use Wegman's giant lot behind it. But then that would wipe away the veneer of it being a separate business...

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

if the site plan looks so bad, can you PLEASE draw up and post what you think it should be. i will be waiting for your article to come out with renderings. most likely i will be waiting forever for this. this includes anyone on here that does nothing but bash. shut up or put up a complete submission

Score: 1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I already said what it should be. No parking lot, or only in the back. Front doors facing Amherst St. Are you dense?

replied to ccbuffalo
Score: 9 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

keep the volume the same but cut out half the depth and make it double the length. Put a front door on amherst street and a rear door in the parking lot that will now be fully behind the building.

costs the same, more urban, looks better (hidden parking), adds more density to amherst st.

everybody wins.

Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

guess you've never worked retail. building rear ends (so to speak) are needed for delivery, storage, and marking product for shelving. two entrances means double the security hassles.

Put the entrance on amherst and lose the stupid grassy strip between the building and sidewalk.

replied to jim1234664
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Funny I know of a liquor store in Tonawanda that has no problem with front and back entrances

replied to grad94
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

can you read, i asked can u draw up the plan mr dense, lol

Score: -18 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So this new building will be slightly prettier equivalent of the Valu store where the side of the building fronts Hertel?

If the entrance doesn't front Amherst Street, won't this be a dead space for pedestrians?

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

All Gates Circle needs to do is keep their prices competitve with whatever store goes into this new build. Simple. If they can't, then they shouldn't have an expectation of staying in business. Who in their right mind is going to actually choose to pay more for anything, especially something like alcohol which is pretty much a luxury purchase?

Everything Wegmans does, they do well. I expect nothing less with this venture and continue to be thankful for a store within city limits.

Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let's get one thing correct, Wegman's will not have an existing liquor store in the new building. They will have thier own people running the store under what "Danny Wegman" says. Yes, they have done the same thing in other cities in NY State. For those who beleive in this, how many family owned bakery's do you see? Once the Big Supermarkets came around they were forced to close their family businesses because the Big Supermarket prices. All of the liquor stores in this state are ALL family owned. The law states that One Name per Liquor License. I hope that if this does happen that the Small Business People survive. And it will depend on YOU the consumer to prevent this from happening. So be wise and really think this through. Many people/stores will close. People you and your families have know for many years.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You say that but meanwhile there are a bunch of folks commenting on Guercio's and other locally owned delis, bakeries, etc. they all frequent vs chain supermarkets. It appears that Wegman's wants a liquor store in close proximity to their supermarket to draw people to a "one stop shopping" area. Since they can't legally operate the store themselves, they are leasing it out to another operator. Who's to say that won't be another local store re-locating or starting up? I personally don't drive far for cheaper liquor, I go where it's closest and open. Otherwise Duty Free would have put small liquor stores out of business years ago. I wouldn't worry.

replied to Small Business
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

SB>"Once the Big Supermarkets came around they were forced to close their family businesses because the Big Supermarket prices."

SB, but Wegmans itself is family owned. Just because consumers here and elsewhere have chosen to make it so unusually successful, that doesn't mean it isn't family owned.

As brownteeth mentioned, there's also smaller family-owned stores like Guercios and some similar ones mentioned in the recent thread about that. So if anybody wants to pretend Wegmans isn't family owned because it's so successful, there's those.
For medium-sized food stores, isn't Budweys family owned by Frank Budwey and family? And Dash's is family owned too.

So, there's quite a few family-owned food stores smaller than Wegmans who are still around and in some cases even expanding.

And I won't even mention that publicly-traded companies like Target who sell food have owners including many pension funds and 401k index mutual funds - in which countless families own shares and profit from.

replied to Small Business
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I hope that if this does happen that the Small Business People survive. And it will depend on YOU the consumer to prevent this from happening."

I disagree, it will depend on the business to prevent themselves from going out of business. If they aren't competitive with their prices, quality and service, they won't survive regardless of big box chain stores moving in. As a consumer I have to choose what's best for me.

I'd be more concerned about min. wage being raised by 20% that Tim Kennedy is proposing. Want to see small businesses fail? That will do it faster than anything.

Furthermore, Wegmans isn't Walmart, they've typically been a good employer and grocer to their community. If there were ever an exception to the big box super store bad guy this is it.

replied to Small Business
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Would this site plan be allowed under the proposed Green Code?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is great, but Wegmans on Amherst ALSO needs to focus on expanding the grocery store itself, staffing it properly, and keeping it as clean as any of it suburban locations. Sadly, the Amherst Street Wegmans is overcrowded, understaffed, and downright unsightly due to its sheer volume.

Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

More about this on @TheBuffaloNews website tonight -- meaning it will likely be in the paper tomorrow:
http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130124/CITYANDREGION/130129564

Good for the neighbors!

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Since they can't legally operate the store themselves, they are leasing it out to another operator. Who's to say that won't be another local store re-locating or starting up?" WRONG...Wegmans is in the Wine and Liquor business with stores in Rochester and Syracuse as well as in NJ, Maryland and Virginia and they will operate this one as well. They might open in another family members name or they might buy another store, say Great Arrow Liquor for example, hire the owner for a short time to work there, but it WILL be a Wegmans Wine store.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

2 years ago Wegman bankrolled an ill conceived "wine in grocery" bill that would have closed most locally owned wine shops and local wineries. Now he wants to own a liquor store in Black Rock? He is quite a piece of work. Lets keep the wine stores owned locally and run by neighborhood people.

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's wrong with trying to change the law to allow wine sales in food stores just like beer is sold?

Beer stores still exist (Village Beer Merchant for instance, or Consumers Beverage stores, etc) even while beer is sold in food stores. But even if none did, that would be due to customers choosing.

What makes him "quite a piece of work" for wanting to let people freely decide from which type of stores to buy wine?
Should selling spices or vinegar in groceries be outlawed just because some stores decide to sell only those products?

replied to Draw
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How does expanding his product line make him a "piece of work"?

replied to Draw
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment