Regional January 24, 2013 4:23 PM

Bethlehem Steel Demolition Begun: Citizens Gather at "Cathedral of Industry", Protest Failure of Leadership, Lost Opportunity

Bethlehem Steel Demolition Begun: Citizens Gather at “Cathedral of Industry”, Protest Failure of Leadership, Lost Opportunity

The following comes from Dana Saylor-Furman with the Lackawanna Industrial Heritage Group

The 1901 Beaux Arts-style Lackawanna Iron and Steel Company Administration Building (later known as the Bethlehem Steel Administration Building) is currently falling to the wrecking ball, despite the efforts of local citizens who have spoken out for its adaptive reuse. The Lackawanna Industrial Heritage Group (LIHG) has learned that Gateway Trade TURNED DOWN several offers of developers to take control of the property, after allowing them to tour the site. Mayor Geoffrey Szymanski refused to listen to the concerns of local citizens, from whom over 600 petition signatures were gathered. 

He could have rescinded the City of Lackawanna's demolition order at any time, but instead, he maintained his entrenched position though the structure poses no threat to public safety. The building is eligible for both the State and National Registers of Historic Places, and was recently nominated as a "National Treasure" by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. LIHG members and the public will gather at the site to document this needless destruction, carried out by Zoladz Contracting and others.

Since the city has no preservation ordinance, though, the fate of the building rests solely in the mayor's hands. Recently, he declared in The Buffalo News, "it's time we got more progressive. Bring down that building." LIHG sees the mayor's actions as anything but progressive, considering the lost potential this demolition signifies. It has been proven that preservation activities promote economic development, vitality, and sustainable urban growth. The young, educated people moving into Western New York and other historic areas have been shown to do so because of the wealth of history, unique architecture, low cost of living and heritage tourism this region offers.

"It is these attitudes that have caused Lackawanna to decline and make it all the more difficult for the city to ever rise up again," says Danielle Huber, chair of the LIHG. "We should be building on our strengths, not wiping them out." Dana Saylor, historian and member of Buffalo's Young Preservationists agreed, saying, "Adaptive reuse was economically feasible and would have been an excellent way to tie in all the waterfront investment happening along Lake Erie. Now, the area will suffer from the loss of potential that preservation activities would have brought to this site. Interesting redeveloped places like the Hotel@Lafayette and Steel Stacks in Bethlehem, P.A. are a draw!"

The Campaign for Greater Buffalo advised and assisted LIHG along the way, with Executive Director Tim Tielman, who said "Without a preservation ordinance in place, Lackawanna will continue to demolish its historic landmarks under the short-sighted policies of its government. The City must move to become a Certified Local Government, and institute a preservation board so what is happening to Bethlehem Steel, and what happened to St. Barbara's, will not befall other important places."

Citizens are encouraged to contact the Mayor of Lackawanna's office, and the building owners: Gateway Trade, get involved in future preservation activism, and consider a contribution to a local preservation organization of their choice. Members of the public, especially former employees of the company, are invited to witness the demolition this week, and speak out.

 

Quick Facts:

1899: Lackawanna Iron & Steel Co. began moving from Scranton, PA to Stony Point, NY in the Town of West Seneca

1900: Lansing C. Holden, AIA member, drew architectural plans for Administration Building

1901: Administration Building completed including rear laboratory, company town launched

1909: City of Lackawanna incorporated

1910: South wing in rear added

1919: North wing and northern 1/3 addition to facade added (approximately)

1922: Bethlehem Steel buys out Lackawanna Iron & Steel

1982: Bethlehem Steel closes Lackawanna plant

1983: Richard & Patricia Garman of R&P Oak Hill Construction purchase complex as "Gateway Trade"

2000: New Enterprise Stone & Lime in P.A./Detwiler family buy out Gateway Trade

2002: Coke production ceased at the site


Entry Image: Courtesy of Buffalo News staff photographer: John Hickey

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

what a crying shame

Score: 14 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bang your head against the wall - Progress WNY style!

Score: 4 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, ya might as well just knock down the basilica. Church attendance is dropping and all, might as well get a jump on the demo to make way for "progress".

The most disappointing of all this is that with each demo Lackawanna City Hall moves up the list of most significant architectural structures in that town. Vomit.

Score: 14 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Lackawanna Industrial Heritage Group (LIHG) has learned that Gateway Trade TURNED DOWN several offers of developers to take control of the property....

Amazing how little details aren't announced until the wrecking ball strikes.

Score: 8 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Amazing how little details aren't announced until the wrecking ball strikes."

Is if ok to ask any of you guys - were those details, little or big, even really 'announced' afterward/yet - even now at this point?

If activists wanted to use for helping to persuade public opinion those offers they're claiming were rejected, I'd think it would've been smarter to release them in detail publicly/transparently (as well as sooner) - such as who were those developers, what were their offers exactly, were their stings attached, etc.

They have/had a right to keep the offers quiet & private, of course, but I wouldn't think that's as likely to be effective.

replied to PaulBuffalo
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Unbelievable. This is a real loss for our region.

Thank you to Dana, Danielle and the rest of the Buffalo Young Preservationists, Preservation Buffalo Niagara and the C4GB for their help in trying to stop this. Your efforts of community events, meetings, petitions, camp outs and letters to politicians across WNY were all important in this effort, regardless of the outcome.

Score: 19 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

HIstoric structures in the Buffalo area are really taking a big hit so far in 2013.
The unique architectural environment that plays a part in former resident's returning to the area and new people relocating here is being lost.
If the trend continues, Buffalo will look just like any other bland, uninteresting place that you can find anywhere in the US.
One less reason to come back---tragic!

Score: 15 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

But they said it's progress.

replied to buffalorr
Score: 11 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't think anyone said it's progress.

replied to LouisTully
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Really? Geoff Szymanski didn't call it progress????????????????????????? Check buffalogni's comment above. That's just one instance it was uttered by Geo. And the countless demo supporters on here and the buffnews all spew progress as a battle cry.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

nauseating

Score: 10 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Congratulations on managing to turn a story about the demolishing of a treasure into some weird sentiment about abortion.

Score: 10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is absolutely mind-boggling and sickening at the same time. How could the inherent value of this building be completely lost on those in charge? Other cities would kill for this building.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Paulsobo,

I was following your post with interest.
However, when you weirdly tried to weave it into the abortion issue, the Twilight Zone theme started playing in my head.

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The usual excuses don't apply here. The building was not in the way of "progress", did not present a danger to the community, and most would agree the building was appealing regardless of their feelings on preservation.

Score: 13 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sad.

This made me laugh though:
"Recently, he declared in The Buffalo News, "it's time we got more progressive. Bring down that building." LIHG sees the mayor's actions as anything but progressive..."

See?! "Progressive" is a useless word. It seems to mean whatever anyone wants it to mean, therefore it is useless. So, can we please stop using it 50 times in every post here?

I feel better now; thanks for letting me get that off my chest.

Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The "progress" crowd uses the word progress like a magic act catch phrase. Reminds me of Mission Accomplished or WMD or GWOT.

replied to Buffalogni
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dragging Mr. Bush into this is similar to an earlier post veering into abortion.

There's no 'progress' crowd. There's only a handful of people in WNY that would argue in favor of this building being torn down. Unfortunately, one of them was elected by the people of Lackawanna to represent them.

The guy's a moron, let's not try to extrapolate more from this than that.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Haha. Fair point, particularly the last sentence. However, I would say there is definitely a "progress" crowd. There is a faction of people that love to spout the word progress like the people from the land of NEEE.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No, my pet peeve is not about politics, this is about communicating clearly.

replied to LouisTully
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The built environment of a city belongs to the citizens, a city is by design a public place. We all have an interest in preservation and protecting the assets that we hold in trust. Preservation is about self preservation, it is about preserving the real value of great architecture even when that value has not yet been fully realized. Demand for attractive, interesting, and historic properties continues to increase as inventory continues to decline. Our future prosperity depends on leveraging these assets. Buffalo has an advantage, we have quality and quanity, we can't afford to continue diminishing that stock.

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Black Rock Lifer,

Well said--I moved back to Buffalo after spending the last 35 years away pursuing my career.
I left reluctantly and when I was finally free to relocate anywhere, my memories of the built environment here in my home town were so compelling in my decision to return.
About a week after I'd moved back, I took a drive over the Skyway out toward's Lackawanna.
When I saw the old Bethlehem Steel Admin. building, I was awestruck that it was still standing.
I used to look at that structure through the yellow-brown haze that the smokestack's caused back in the 60's when we would speed past it on the old Father Baker Bridge and even as a kid was amazed at the elegance of it in the middle of all the industrial muck.
I immediately thought "moving back and seeing this still standing after all these years validates my decision to return here."
Wish those who don't appreciate what is still left would realize how important Buffalo's architecture is to those of us who grew up with it while Buffalo was still in it's glory days.
A whole new generation is appreciating that more than mine did, that what's keeping me optimistic about Buffalo's future.
To all of those dedicated people I say " don't ever give up the fight and Thank you!!".

Score: 15 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your right about the younger generations, they appreciate our architecture and old neighborhoods. They recognize the value and I don't mean as in return on investment but as in community and sense of place. I watched our city decline for many years, there were few advocates for preservation and many old neighborhoods were decimated as long term residents left for the suburbs. That trend has stabilized and even reversed in many cases, we have a long way to go but the momentum is on our side.

replied to buffalorr
Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Today, while driving home from Hamburg, I looked over and saw the lone warrior sitting by his tent with his car parked out in front. I did not even notice any demolition taking place. I told my daughters to look over there as I slowed down on Rt.5, there is a man fighting the bitter cold in a tent making a stand for saving a building.

That my friends is a preservationist in action. I salute that man. Szymanski you dumb ass.

Score: 12 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, One of the luxuries of being unemployed is being able to fully pursue your hobbies and dedicate yourself to things that make you happy...whether that be volunteering at your local church, tending to your garden, or hanging out in a tent in the freezing cold in order to prevent a building from being demolished....must be nice

replied to Old First Ward
Score: -2 ( 24 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That comment is basically the definition of ignorant. You really think the defining characteristic of the people standing up against needless destruction is unemployment? I bet you lack the character to stand up for something you believe in even if you had all the time in the world.

replied to ivan putski jr
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'll bet he's both unemployed and on drugs. All these subversive types are. Was he wearing a Che Guevera t-shirt?

replied to Old First Ward
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

He might have been...it's like those pro-lifers out there on Main Street across from the CPG....I mean I understand having an opinion but wouldn't you rather spend your weekend watching football, going for a bike ride, sleeping off your hangover....or doing anything other than standing...or in some cases kneeling for hours on a depressing street corner....I don't even like given up part of my weekend to see my family let alone to hang out with other jerks who happen to share the same beliefs as me

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

we should have called for a boycott of lackawanna (shops, cafes, the basilica, etc.) until the demo order was rescinded.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is there anything in Lackawanna to boycott?

replied to grad94
Score: 17 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

curly's. the basilica. the funky bar across from city hall. sheesh, give the city some credit.

replied to charger
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just one: Cheesy's Little Vegas

replied to charger
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As a life long resident of Buffalo, I can honestly say that Lackawanna had 3 things I ever thought were cool. The Basilica, the Father Baker bridge, and the Bethlehem Steel building. I guess two of the three will be gone. What a pathetic mayor they have. I think we were all upset that the mayors weren't doing anything to get it developed. I suppose one way to get that monkey off their back is to just remove it.

It really is such a sad, sad, ridiculous waste.

I don't even want to tell my 91 yr old Dad. He'll ask the obvious question, "Why?"

Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Mayor"ski",

Just another moron politician from Lackawanna. A city born from the Steel Mill, and died from the Steel Mill. Don't look at Bethlehem, PA for ideas, help, shared collaboration with what they did with their steel mill or what their doing with the HQ building....your next progress should be to dissolve that armpit of Western NY that you hold throne to.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

irishmedic>'… Mr. Mayor"ski", Just another moron politician...'

How surprising that an anti-Polish ethnicity dig like that not only gets no criticism yet, but is voted a +8 on here so far.

Mayor"ski" ... seriously?

Awesome tolerance & civility!

replied to irishmedic716
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Truly a sad day. That being said, something proactive should have been done years, if not decades ago, to preserve this building. I'll truly miss seeing this structure.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Location, location, location. This building, while arguably an architectural "gem", is in a very poor location. It's the lack of any surrounding development that this building's doom was all but guaranteed.

Score: -1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"lack of any surrounding development" Doesn't that basically describe those seneca casinos down the 90? How are they surviving?

replied to Prospero
Score: -3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's across the street from Buffalo's new Union Ship Canal industrial park development site.

replied to Prospero
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That ship canal site contains all of 3 companies, right? - (Sonwill Distribution, CertainTeed, Cobey), none of which are types of businesses which attract flows of consumers.

And doesn't it seem like a very sprawled area?

Not that there's anything wrong with sprawl when that's what people choose to have - but would employees at those 3 co's really be very likely to have any big impact as customers for something across Route 5 where the Bethlehem building was?

Doesn't the non-highway part of Route 5 a bit south of where the building was have quite a few vacancies in storefronts and other commercial properties? Say from Ridge to Milestrip? It isn't totally empty, but it's far from vibrant or growing.

Prospero went only slightly far to say lack of _any_ development, but it seems fair to say lack of much development.
Or lack of development which would provide a lot of customer spin-off to motivate an expensive conversion of the Bethlehem into a consumer based use. Where the building was doesn't seem like pleasant surroundings for residential either - basically a rustbelty industrial area.

replied to 300miles
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I realize the area is not booming. But it would short-sighted and lacking in any imagination to not see the potential for the Bethlehem building (or at least its facade). It's on the bike path and road that leads directly to Buffalo's outer harbor sites like Gallagher Beach, Dug's Dive, and Small Boat harbor. I've walked from those sites to the Bethlehem site many times, and those areas and connecting areas are improving every year. Even closer is the Union Ship Canal park and business park. It's not booming now either, but there's a lot of shovel-ready land there with brand new infrastructure. Lots of potential. Then we cross the border into lackawanna and this amazing building is probably being demolished just a few years before that area turns around. Incredible lack of foresight on their part...

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

300 - we can agree to disagree about how likely it is that area will have enough amount of rebound for spinoff of something consumer-driven at the building's site.

Potential, sure, but hope isn't a plan. Stuff you list (ship canal businesses, Dug's, bike path, etc) are real, but seem pretty low impact and aren't extremely close by either. Much - if not most - of structural surroundings around there are decrepit rotting industrial buildings. Beauty is in eyes of beholders, but so are eyesores. Like I said, many buildings from Ridge to Milestrip sit vacant too.

Prospero's statement about lack of development seems correct for now and next decade at least or longer. Saying lack of 'any' development was a bit too strong. Lacking enough likely development to motivate expensively rehabbing that building seems right, however.

But time will tell if your more optimistic predictions come true about the other stuff around there. For how long have some people been optimistic about the Freezer Queen building's potential, but there it still sits. It might never attract enough investment for a rehab/reuse. Supply vs demand.

replied to 300miles
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think that Prospero has a point. No matter how sentimental you want to be about it, preservation is as much about money. The only way preservation can successfully be done in Buffalo is convince people that it makes financial sense to undertake the expense and trials of refurbishing an older building into something which could be reused. This building is hard to get to, in terrible shape, full of who-knows-what from its days as an industrial site, and surrounded by decaying industry. If I were an investor, I would have serious misgivings about wagering any money on that building. Especially since it really seems to be onlythe facade which is interesting. The other parts of the building are as ugly as anything else from the rest of the steel mill. It's a shame it had to be torn down, particularly since it really isn't near anything it could pose a danger to, and could have been left alone for possibly another year or 2 before it started collapsing on it's own.

replied to Prospero
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wrecking Ball 3 Preservationists 0. Smoke Shop Building, Church and now this. Whats next those peace bridge houses ?

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Do we know anything about the offers to purchase the building? Who were the potential purchasers and were the offers reasonable?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I echo the sentiments of a fellow reader from a previous article stating that the preservation community in the city needs to be less reactive and more proactive. This building has been vacant since 1982. That more or less gave the region thirty years to develop some type of reuse plan for the structure. Of course, as things generally do, nobody steps up, protests, plans or does any research until the wrecking ball is poised in position. When that is the case there is a mass outcry of hysteria and lamenting and often very little thought other than to "save the structure". It seems to me it would be more beneficial to identify sites in danger that aren't structurally compromised and begin to hypothesize solutions for their preservation, instead of waiting until the last minute and making spur of the moment decisions based on emotional highs. I have seen this happen time and time again and the preservation communities, for the most part, do not seem to learn. We let a structure go and corrode for decades and then when it is demolished due to structural compromise and a frenzy of last minute court decisions we lament it as "wrecking Buffalo". Let this be a lesson and let us be more prudent in identifying and rallying around endangered structures for adaptive reuse before they spend decades crumbling to the ground.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes! A regionally based proactive historic preservation planning approach rather than last minute "I want that" and throw a big fuss during the final hours! I couldn't agree more! This building is a loss and its apparent some good well thought out preservation planning that is proactive will be key. This should include incentive based planning and implementation rather than beating property owners over the head during the last minutes. This ought to include specific goals aimed at improving inspection processes and holding delinquent building owners responsible to at least seal up and monitor their properties. Does the City and other regional localities have adequate code enforcement staff numbers to meet demands or are they drowning without enough resources? Is it truly that they don't do their jobs or are case loads so large that enforcement can be none other than complaint based?

Maybe when truly historically valuable structures are targeted for demo, a plan for redevelopment of the site must accompany it along with financial and economic impacts to see whether a parking lot is planned OR perhaps something significant and of real value might be on its way. Right now I don't think we get the complete picture. Substantively what does Gateway trade have in store for the Bethlehem Admin site, etc. etc.

Seems the region needs a comprehensive buildings survey to identify what truly has historic preservation battle worthiness and what doesn't. Perhaps a rating system or something. Otherwise its just chaos, us versus them same old same old spinning the tires. What can the region truly do without and what can it do without? Honestly the loss of the one story corner Cigar Shop doesn't bother me a bit but Bethlehem Admin does.

replied to buffalotrad116
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not trying to pick an argument here but..
The Bethlehem steel building has been vacant longer than I has been alive. Asking "where were you 10 years ago" is pointless because most of us were not around for reasons beyond our control. (I was in high school!)
Be happy that there is a growing new wave of people working to help save and build upon buffalos incredible urban fabric. Just because it wasn't a priority 10 years ago doesn't mean it can't be today.

replied to buffalotrad116
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fair enough regarding 10 years ago, (and this isn't meant to single out you in a personal way, or any individual) …
but isn't it reasonable to ask was _anyone_ at all making any big serious effort about this building even a few years ago?

Like way back in say 2007 or 2008? How about 2009, 2010, 2011?
Were there any publicly transparent purchase offers from developers with ideas, or from nonprofit groups willing to take responsibility for it Central Terminal style? Or any fund raising efforts to set aside money for it? Or any efforts to campaign for different politicians in Lackawanna who'd favor keeping it around?
Anything serious at all?

It was written up about once a year or so on this blog, or in Spree mag, etc - so is isn't as though the public wasn't aware it was at serious risk.

The mayor whose ethnicity some on here approve ridiculing didn't even first take office until Jan 1, 2012.

replied to bernicebuffalove
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Details of the building were mildly interesting, and deserved reuse elsewhere, but the thing as a whole was unloved until now.

replied to bernicebuffalove
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That foolish unemployed preservationalist sleeping in his tent protesting should apply working for a Demolition Co. in the area,that seems to be a hot job!

Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Your right about that Mr. Rockpile ! Is he going to move his tent in front of the Peace Bridge houses, theyre probably next !

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Might be resting up from the "Occupy" movement.
If so, all the credit in the world to this hardy soul.
Not many of us could do this.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I always try to keep an open mind, I really do. Unfortunately, I feel like the preservationist are pushing me away.
I loved this building. Everytme we drove to Hamburg I looked forward to seeing and thinking of what coulda been?
All those years passing by it just sat there. What a shame. Then it magically turned into an icon that needed love.
There in lies my problem, the preservationist seem to claim the Mayor is not progressive but yet did nothing the previous 30 years?
Your message is becoming deluted. It is the same everytime a demo permit is issued. "This is a must save"?
I could drive around the city and pick out a dozen buildings I feel the same about.
Please do the same, and before the next lawsuit, have done something about one of those buildings.
Please let me read that article before the next attempt to stop a demo.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hi oldschool. I really don't think it works that way. If a building is privately owned and just sitting there, what can be done? You can't force someone to sell. You can't force someone to fix it up. The only recourse is to get the city to enforce it's building codes (if any are known to be broken) But you can't always tell the building's condition from the street, and the city is often not interested anyway. So then what?

The reason these buildings only get attention before demolition is because demolition can be halted if the building is considered historic.

replied to old school
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Can't save em all,Maybe while they have the equipment warmed up they can take care of the central terminal too!

Score: -6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"We should be building on our strengths, not wiping them out." Dana Saylor, historian and member of Buffalo's Young Preservationists agreed, saying, "Adaptive reuse was economically feasible and would have been an excellent way to tie in all the waterfront investment happening along Lake Erie. Now, the area will suffer from the loss of potential that preservation activities would have brought to this site. Interesting redeveloped places like the Hotel@Lafayette and Steel Stacks in Bethlehem, P.A. are a draw!" Who are these investors and if adaptive reuse was feasable why was it not done? Besides Dana saying it was feasible did anyone who might understand the construction process and costs associated with it look at this?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

glad its gone, you had 30 yrs to do something about it. still laughing at the unemployed fool in his tent protesting. lol, get a life!

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why did they knock it down... I cant see it in the above comments as I looked through. Just because?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well the next thing that ought to be gone is the 'City' of Lackawanna. Can anyone justify why this should not be annexed to the City of Buffalo?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Because Buffalo already has enough problems.

replied to fdr
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment