Real Estate November 28, 2012 12:00 PM

Rumor: Walmart Eyeing Hertel/Elmwood Corner

Rumor: Walmart Eyeing Hertel/Elmwood Corner

Walmart, which has been rumored to be looking for a North Buffalo location for years, apparently is close to buying properties at the northwest corner of Hertel and Elmwood avenues for a new store.  A commercial real estate insider says the retail giant is said to be buying a string of properties "from the donut shop to the Home Depot plaza."  The brownfield site is across from an LA Fitness that Benderson Development is building.

In the United States, Walmart employs more than 1.4 million people in Supercenters, Walmart Discount Stores, Neighborhood Markets, Walmart Express Stores and Sam's Clubs.  There are 114 Walmart and Sam's Clubs stores in New York, none within the City of Buffalo.  Walmart operates more than 10,000 retail units under 69 banners in 27 countries.

walmartnb.JPG

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

That stretch of Elmwood is a craphole, might as well go full craphole with wal-mart. The only good is that maybe it'll spur something/anything on the SW corner.

Score: -2 ( 40 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cue anti-corporate anti-Walmart freakout in 3...2...1....

Score: 34 ( 74 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wal-Mart sucks but something in that area is better than nothing. The only thing I don't like is that one of my favorite buildings in buffalo will be knocked down to build this Wal-Mart. The Acme Nipple Co., it's not the heritage of the building so much as the name... I love that name. Whenever I am back in Buffalo with someone new I enjoy showing them that sign.

Score: 36 ( 56 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It should be from a Road Runner episode..

replied to buffaloroam
Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Typically thousands of people apply for the several hundred jobs Walmart offers in a new store. Terrible job? No more terrible than any other low-end retail job. And any job is better than a lifetime of doing nothing but collecting welfare.

And the store, with some nice landscaping, will look a lot better than the junk that's there.

A huge net win for the area.

Score: 15 ( 51 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually, that's a good point. Walmart provided a very good source of income to my grandparents after they were retired from their prior jobs but still needed money coming in. They were treated well and enjoyed it.

I can't say that I'm clued into all the evils of Walmart. All I do know is that they treated by grandparents very well and served an important purpose in their lives. It would be great if they could do the same here.

replied to rubagreta
Score: 17 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There's a grouping of historic industrial buildings there, Acme Nipple Factory, I believe.

Score: 19 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

HeHe...you said nipple

replied to MEG
Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Their produce is actually better than Tops--its always fresher. It's a pretty good place to shop for groceries.

Score: -9 ( 43 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Tops is rolling out a small high end grocery concept called Orchard Fresh, if it does well here they will roll out regionally/nationally, sounds good. The tilt will be towards health/organic but not exclusively, first location is in village of OP, where I once predicted Trader joes would land. Stay tuned for Trader Joes and Whole Foods announcements soon. The Grocery wars are coming.

replied to oldwaiter
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes I heard this too. 2013 will be a rocky road for these folks, including the people on Hertel, but for the better.

replied to The Boss
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are in fact very nice, urban Walmarts in other U.S. cities. Not that I expect they'll bother with anything other than their crappy suburban model @ this location. Oh well.

Score: 4 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If this actually gets built, I hope the sight plan gets submitted after the new zoning ordinance is adopted by the Common Council. Even though this corner is far from walkable, how incredible would it be if Walmart was the progenitor of a denser, mixed-use node at this intersection (i.e. http://bit.ly/UchXqG) instead of reinforcing an already automobile-centric part of the city.

Score: 11 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Although I expect the Green Code will add improved design standards for sprawl-style retail centers, unfortunately (at least in the last released draft) the entire swath of North Buffalo between Elmwood and Delaware and Kenmore and Hertel is being written off for car-centric sprawl-type retail. I guess it is a "grand compromise" with developers to allow the existing pedestrian-oriented streets like Allen, Elmwood, Hertel, Main, Bailey, Grant, Amherst, etc., to be designated as mixed-use pedestrian-oriented streets in the new code.

So the good news is, no more drug stores with enormous parking lots filling the corners on Hertel or Elmwood. The bad news if you live in North Buffalo west of Delaware is that it is officially open season for your neighborhood to continue to look more and more like Niagara Falls Boulevard.

replied to BufHky
Score: 14 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If being green concerns you, just consider that people now won't have to drive out to the burbs to go to big-box stores.

replied to JSmith
Score: -1 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Did I say anything about "being green"? "Buffalo Green Code" is just the name for the new zoning ordinance that will be ready in the beginning of 2013.

replied to Buffalogni
Score: 11 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wal-Mart is good for low-income residents. Good, safe products at reasonable prices. If you choose to spend your money elsewhere, great; don't deny other less fortuante people the chance to stretch their hard-earned (or government issued) money as far as possible.

Score: -6 ( 50 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Except when it isn't. . . .it's an unvirtuous (is that a word or did I make it up?) cycle.

People buy cheap crap from overseas at Walmart because they can't afford nicer things because can't find a good job making anything at American factories because people buy cheap crap made overseas from Walmart. It's the cycle of violence baby!

Hurry everyone and catch the holiday sales so you can win the race to the bottom!

replied to ex-716
Score: 25 ( 51 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I believe the word you're looking for is "vicious". Vicious cycle.

replied to North Park
Score: 9 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...Obama-Biden 2008 sticker on a Honda. That about sums it up.

replied to North Park
Score: -13 ( 51 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

what about a romney/ryan sticker on a honda? i think that would be more ironic.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 0 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thing is...I've never seen it.

Score: -3 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's because the Romney-Ryan stickers are on even cheaper cars like Kias. I've seen it.

Score: -1 ( 25 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is that the Honda built in Marysville, Ohio or East Liberty, Ohio or Decatur County, Indiana. What's your point?

Score: 12 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They should build it similar to the Walmart in Wheatfield. Hide it behind trees. I hate Walmart but admit it would be a good location considering FWS may be converted to mixed use.
I was hoping Paula's donuts would have moved in to the old Dickies Donuts..

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The ACME Nipple company?! That is the best name ever.

And sure, welcome Walmart. Why not?

Score: 6 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hopefully this is a rumor, Wal Mart adds nothing to a community but in fact results in higher costs to taxpayers since their employees are among the lowest paid in the country. We will subsidize the Wal Mart employees with health care, food stamps, housing, etc since Wal Mart does not provide a fair wage or enough hours to allow their work force to be self sufficient. Their products are of the lowest quality and Wal Mart has a sordid history of exploiting the poor throughout the world. Wal Mart also drives out existing business resulting in less choice, fewer jobs, and a shrinking tax base. Let's not allow this corporate parasite to blight the Elmwood Hertel area, we desreve better.

Score: 21 ( 61 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not that I'm a fan of Walmart but to be fair the people who choose to work there are not being forced by gun point. It's no different than any other retail job/employer.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 15 ( 35 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In many communities people have literally no other choice but to work for wal mart.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 10 ( 24 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually It is different. Wegmans for instance does not pay poverty wages and does provide health care benefits and continuing education. Just because Walmart says the have to pay so low does not mean they actually do have to pay so low. It would be interesting to institute a corporate tax based on the number of your employees who qualify for public assistance such as food stamps etc. I believe that Walmart employs the most people who qualify as living below the poverty line and who qualify for public aid.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 20 ( 42 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In 2011 the company made 3.8 billion, so let's round that up to 4 billion.

They have about 2 million employees. Per worker, that means Walmart makes $2,000 profit per employee. If the employee worked a full 50 weeks, at 40 hours, that's 2000 hours.

So, the company makes, in profit, about $1 per hour per employee.

A casual observer might argue their employees are being exploited, but looking further, it's an extension of the business model. Cut all costs, pay vendors as little as possible, work on a thin margin, but sell the crap out of it. We might like the compensation model to be different, but it changes the entire business.

replied to STEEL
Score: 3 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

benfranklin, your numbers are seriously off. Walmart pulls in over $4 billion a QUARTER, not a year.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 14 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're right. Besides posting here, I try to run a business. I should take my posting here more seriously and quit my job.

I looked it up quick, and used quarterly numbers for annual.

So...for every employee, the company makes $4 per hour.

replied to jag
Score: -3 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

not many retail workers actually log 40 hours/week, the employer makes it a point to avoid that so they do not qualify for benefits

replied to benfranklin
Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not defending Walmart, I'm merely saying that people have a choice where they wish to work, especially in the retail world where there are many options and all pay virtually the same. Wegmans is an exception to the rule and luckily an employer in WNY.

replied to STEEL
Score: 8 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

But in many places that have a Wal Mart that is completely not true. May not be the case in Buffalo, but they've built their entire rural retail model on being the only game in town.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me clarify, I'm only referring to this Buffalo location.

replied to townline
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And they employee the most people..period. Do you mean the highest percentage? Otherwise, your post is not persuasive. If they employee the most people on food stamps, then I say thank you Walmart for hiring the poor that others won't.

replied to STEEL
Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I was speaking more to the impact on our community rather than the plight of their workers. All retail pays pretty crappy wages but Wal Mart leads the other stores in poor treatment of their employees. Wal Mart has a long and well documented history of workplace abuses here in the United States and all around the world.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I totally agree. This would be a major step back for this part of the city. It will hurt small businesses and drive wages even lower. I hope the city does whatever it can to prevent a Walmart from built in the city. Any local politician that supports a Walmart in Buffalo is essentially taking a position against small businesses, against labor unions and against US made goods.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 2 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There isnt exactly a line of potential developers waiting to put this parcel to good use...say what you like , but it would be a boon to the long neglected corner...plus jobs..added sales tax revenue, and of course added realty tax base...unless you have something better to offer...then you can always boycott the store, and vote with your wallet if you feel that strongly!

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 7 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or we can vote with our vote (like ya do in representative democracy) and pressure city officials to reject Walmart. My guess is that Walmart shoppers are generally less politically engaged than Walmart opponents. Local unions and business associations should really take action if this is more than just a rumor.

replied to joey d
Score: -5 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Hertel Elmwood area has attracted steady developement over the past 20 years, I don't think this parcel will stay vacant with or without a Wal Mart. This is a prime retail area, Wal Mart is not the best use for this space, the neighborhood can do better.
As for sales tax, I don't see how this will generate any new revenue but will simply shift revenue from somewhere else in the county. Since sales tax is a state/county take it makes no difference where the store is located.

replied to joey d
Score: 6 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Black Rock, Malone here.

I look at this as an opportunity. I live in the Hertel district near Main and obviously know your terrain, so this development impacts both of us. So let’s start with this: if Wal-Mart wants this parcel they are going to get this parcel, this is not there first rodeo, and they know they will win the war and as they have already game theorized it. So, take that as a given, how do you change it?

I would think protest, for lack of better word, should be focused on their Foundation and it giving back to our community, simply: engage them and demand that they get involved in a tangible way, as it could be a wonderful partnership. Simple opposition is a wasted effort in my opinion, although I'm not suggesting you are in opposition, rather merely commenting.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Karl- Wal Mart doesn't engage with the community in a meaningful way, that would add cost and deny the Walton family and the idle investor class from squeezing every last penny out of every poor soul unlucky to be involved with Wal Mart. I do respect Wal Mart for being an equal opportunity abuser, after all they exploit people from all over the world, not just Americans. They exploit and abuse woman, minorities, illegal aliens, third world citizens, and the communities they occupy. I think Wal Mart does get a bad rap, they are simply the naked face of corporate America and their right wing allies that worships at the altar of greed and excess.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My experience has been the big box retailers talk a good talk but rarely engage with the communities that make their success possible. They are quick to pose for a photo op or blow their own horn about their donation to some cause of the month but never seem to offer any real or long term support.
I have been involved with many volunteer community projects over the past 20 years. When we looked for help the big guys almost always ignored us or offered tokens like free gloves or garbage bags. The small neighborhood based business usually gave generously, even volunteered themselves to help. They often did so quietly without expecting to be recognized, this is what community is all about.
Residents and area small business owners worked together to create a park at Amherst and Niagara, to create greenspace and plant trees at the Amherst/Tonawanda traffic islands, to paint the Amherst St viaduct, and to replace and maintain the Black Rock sign at Niagara and Amherst. Wal Mart is the antithesis of that dynamic.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah, but where are the other solutions? At least this is a private developer. Until someone else comes up with a solution for that intersection (and more importantly the capital) then its hard to complain.

A Walmart unfortunately looks better and pays more taxes than an abandoned building.

If the land was in such high demand in the first place, Walmart would never dare open a store there in the first place due to the property tax.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Would that include the Nortel Bar & Grill?

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This will only put KMart out of business, and I think actually spur some other growth. I'm no fan of WalMart, and would much rather see a Costco, but this corner is so barren that I actually think it's a good idea, although I bet it will never happen.

Score: 9 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

NW corner of Elmwood & Hertel is a bad location -- there's an extensive habitat regeneration area that can be seen on the entry image, but which is even more impressive on the ground. There is succession forest, and much of it is native species, as opposed to the invasives that often move into former rail corridors (which this is).

Just a bit north (where you see the Home Depot logo in the entry image) would be a much better location: the former Curtiss-Wright plant, currently for sale. With (as I understand) 400,000 sq. ft. of space, that would give Walmart all the space it needs and then some. While I haven't been inside, it almost certainly has steel truss rafters, which would make for some cool interior spaces. Its conversion could potentially even become a historic preservation tax credit project, which I'm guessing would be a first for Walmart.

The Curtiss-Wright plant, if I'm not mistaken, was built toward the end of WWI to meet military production needs, allowing C-W to move out of its smaller, temporary space in the former Thomas Flyer plant where Rich Products HQ is now located. I'm not sure, but it's possible that it was the first purpose-built plant for industrial-scale production of aircraft in the U.S.

Many will oppose Walmart for economic justice and other concerns with which I can identify. It might be a smart move by Walmart to declare their intentions to rehab the existing building for their purposes. Otherwise, they'll be fighting not only those in the community who oppose them for economic reasons, but also those who will oppose the clearcutting of a succession forest as well as the demolition of the old industrial buildings of character north of Hertel.

Doing this right, Walmart might have a shot. Otherwise, they may face opposition more intense and from more directions than they face in most places.

Score: 13 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The CW building is landlocked by Home Depot. My company built that office building behind Home Depot for Deronde Tire who uses part of the CW building for tire storage. They would need some serious easements to make that work.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting info. I'd opt for the serious easements.

replied to brownteeth
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Assuming Home Depot would allow that.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are more than 250 definitions of the term "forest." Your definition is the most comical.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: -2 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow, BRO is being very pro HUUUUUUUUGEE-AH Corporation today. This is an interesting and refreshing change of pace. I am curious to see how walmart might propose this.

Score: -2 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

To the virtuous ones who don't buy "cheap crap from overseas," please check your computer and monitor to see where they were made, check your shirt tag, and shoes. Then please check where any three random plastic items in your house were made. I'd be surprised if any of those items were made in the U.S. and surprised if you bought any at Wal-Mart (since you are virtuous).

What's the harm of letting Wal-Mart sell poor people the same stuff for less?

Score: 0 ( 30 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You miss the point entirely. Walmart is the biggest offender by far when in comes to cheap foreign made goods (that local small business can't compete with) and anti-labor union tactics. Walmart is basically the main bully on the world stage driving wages down by pressuring manufacturers to sell products for lower and lower prices and then obliterating local small business economies.

replied to ex-716
Score: 1 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i love shopping at Walmart, there reall popular down here.

Score: -7 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

City should allow Walmart to build only if they put their parking lot at rear of store.

Score: 22 ( 34 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And instead of those urban-esque overhead lamps that they use, they should light the store with chandeliers. Also if they have room for a charter school somewhere in the store, that would be good too.

replied to Buffaloian
Score: 4 ( 30 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Because building the same exact building to the lot line is more expensive how?

replied to BuffaloEmigrant
Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Man, some of the regulars here really need to get a sense of humor.

replied to BuffaloEmigrant
Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I can only support this if they build it to look like the unbuilt Frank Lloyd Wright Walmart. And build it to the curb.

Score: 16 ( 34 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think its time that Buffalo gets an American Apparel store. I'm sure the hipster-style of some items will turn off some people but the clothes are made in the US, reasonably priced and good quality. An Elmwood, Hertel or Allentown location would be perfect.

Score: 2 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Isn't that kinda of ironic?

replied to davvid
Score: -5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

no

replied to Postermaster
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe they can sell some PBR, now that would organic, I mean ironic.

replied to davvid
Score: 1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

PBR is another decent product, reasonably priced and made in the US by unionized workers. I'm not sure what your point is about irony. You many dislike hipsters but their brand loyalty has some important rationale behind it. Walmart shoppers on the other hand are choosing low priced, low quality products usually made in China and are contributing to the decline of the American standard of living.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree, Wal-Mart is so mainstream, although I heard they were thinking about putting bike lanes inside the store, now that is ironic.

replied to davvid
Score: 3 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yo, how many times are you gonna lay the same played out joke on us? Get some new material. Or stop being a useless tool and contribute something.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 0 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ok, read some contributions. Fair enough. Nevertheless, I've seen the PBR joke within like the last two days.

Also how many times are we gonna see a name variation, Mailman?

replied to Postermaster
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Louis,

Yes, it has been a two day run with the PBR and ironic motif, it will continue forward for a few more runs so I can’t really help you there. The Malone question is another story.

I regularly get banned from this site. Steel often cuts my BR account b/c apparently my voice doesn't count, even though it does count in real world matters around here. My guess is he suffers from a God complex. Queenseye bans me for going over the line with my comments, but I cannot fault him for they often do.

So, when I re-register I come back in a slight reiteration of my original moniker: Karl Malone. This in spite of the fact that I am middle-class, white person, simply put, I love his game.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I lol'd. It is a fun game. The last one took me a day or two to figure out the mailman connection.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Which is kind of funny, something like American Appearal would show that their is actual interest in Buffalo from outside the region. It would be a great sign of the health of the Elmwood and Hertel Strips.

Also I think a few corperate chains mixed in with the local ones might attract people from the Galleria Mall to Elmwood and North Buffalo. Done smartly it could be a good thing for local businesses. However of course we should not go overboard, and its a good thing that the Elmwood Village Association and the Hertel Business Association exist to properly plan and learn from the mistakes of other cities which grew to fast to protect small business.

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bass Pro anyone?

Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@benfranklin: In addition to the profit being off, so are the employees. This article states 1,400,000. Plus you assume they are all full time. Probably only 1/3rd are, which means the FTE's (Full Time Equivalent), are closer to 1,000,000.

So now you are at $8.00 per person per hour.

Bottom line is someone wants to build at the intersection of two of our major business districts (Elmwood and Hertel). This intersection is awful. You have bare land, a closed down donut shop and a Kinkos. Bring on Big Box. It can't hurt that corner.

Score: 8 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I never heard so many illinformed people talk about Wal mart. It is a great place to work, don't listen to the crap you hear. Isn't this the same city that bent over backwards to put a k Mart in the slums that now sits empty .

Score: -3 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The food is better quality and cheaper and better assortment than TOPs. Thats true. I dont think their employees get paid better than employees at TOPs.

TOPs is local. Its our equivalent of Wegmans but its disappointing that TOPs is nowhere near competing with either Walmart or Wegmans. Though a Walmart SuperCenter will hurt both TOPs and Wegmans.

What I would have liked to see is Walmart locate further towards Black Rock and do something more upscale.

I guess its best to say...anything that makes North Buffalo, West Side and Black Rock more livable helps to stabilize the area from further deterioration is about the best we can hope to achieve.

Score: -3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'd favor Walmart being allowed at Hertel-Elmwood with a big front parking lot like the City allows for Target, Tops, Home Depot, and many others in that general area... although I'm surprised if Walmart really isn't sticking with what looked like a strategy of staying outside of the city's boundaries. The new Seneca St Walmart is a few feet across the city line into West Seneca, and the new Amherst store is less than 2 miles from the city.

Maybe in the northern area there isn't a suitable site available in Kenmore, or maybe they don't think the current majority on the Common Council will try to unreasonably restrict them here.

Walmart should just have to follow the same rules as apply to everyone else here - no more, no less.

Score: 0 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Rules change. Why can't the city change the rules regulating this kind of retail store design in this neighborhood from this point forward. Target, Tops, Home Depot etc. have existed for 10 years or so and can be grandfathered in. Walmart poses a unique threat to the neighborhood economy and the city should respond to that threat.

replied to whatever
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Why can't the city change the rules regulating this kind of retail store design in this neighborhood from this point forward."

I'd think the rules _can_ be changed as long as long as they'd apply to everyone (or at least all future businesses), not just singling out Walmart.

However, even though the rules can change, if you're referring to parking lot size or store square feet - I don't think a big new restriction in those is the majority consensus here as expressed so far in drafts of Green Code new zoning.

In other words, it seems to me the consensus among the mostly Democrats who are writing the new codes and will be enacting them officially is to continue what started mostly during Masiello's time with allowing in that general part of the city Tops, Target, Wegmans, Home Depot, Regal Cinema, etc.
That part of the city has been very popular for shopping.

I'd think the City _could_ if it wanted, for example, take the Elmwood Village rules and apply them to that northern part too. Such a decision would surely keep out Walmart, but it would also have many other side effect impacts in the future (even if it was legal to grandfather the current Target, etc).
But I don't think the City will choose to do anything like that because I don't think it's what most people would want. It would result in an even bigger portion of retail purchases happening in burbs.

replied to davvid
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right. The rules can and probably should change. The city should consider how a Walmart at that site might negatively affect the surrounding community and it should use its power to minimize that negative effect. It would take some time to analyze exactly what the effect has been on other communities and what aspect of Walmart's business model is so damaging. Walmart wouldn't be able to sell wine at their store for example. So wine shops have little to worry about. Perhaps there are other aspects of Wakmart's business model that could be regulated in order to protect small businesses in the community from unfair competition. I would urge lawmakers to do what they can to stop a Walmart altogether but I'm not sure exactly how that can happen.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A different approach the City _could_ try if (hypothetically) it wants to keep out Walmart is just allow it in principle but keep fighting about a lot of details hoping that Walmart would eventually give up.

That could become a battle of wills, but the risk the Common Council would be taking that way would be political if most people in the city took Walmart's side - also hypothetically - depending on if the details were perceived by the public to be unreasonable.

Something like that happened on a small scale recently with the Aldi on Broadway, but after a couple months or so the approval was granted.

replied to davvid
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yes, exactly.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

reasons why I'm glad Buffalo stays broke. Less money to do stupid stuff.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My fellow Buffalonians, this is a great announcement for North Buffalonians, but not East, West or South Buffalonians. The West Side has a Wegmans and Tops (with a Hispanic flair to it), South Buffalo has a plethora of grocery stores, but what does the East Side have? Not much of anything, but some ghetto Tops on Jefferson I believe (but Im not sure). Look, the East side has been neglegted since the late 70's and early 80's. It used to have a Sears and stores, and was as bustling as the West Side until history took it's course. But my point is, there are nostores or businesses on the East Side with the potential to create jobs because these businesses are afraid to move in. In fact, I'll bet all of you if any chain of any local, regional or national significance was looking over its war map of where to install their next/newest store in Buffalo they don't even consider the East Side. But do they consider the fact that it has 4 major highways running through it(33, 198, 5 (Main St.) and arguably the 90)! Don't forget about direct light rail access, vacant rail lines running straight throughout the East Side, and enough abandoned warehouses. In addition, it houses my father's alma mater, The big "C", in which he would walk to his house from his Hamlin park house. And this wasn't in the '40s or '50s or anything, it was the Superb Sixties with race riots and everything. But with Canisius College (hence the Big "C") in the HEART of the West Side, a prominent private school in the Northeast U.S., how can ANYONE possibly look over this beautifully convient section of the city in a perfect world? They can't. But they can today, and for one word: FEAR. Because when do you hear about shootings at Canisius or shops and businesses in that area? Never. All of this is just food for thought/my $0.02 on this.

Score: -1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Quoth Buffaboy: "Because when do you hear about shootings at Canisius or shops and businesses in that area? Never."

CONSTANTLY is the correct answer to your question, if we consider "that area" - Delavan is a hotbed of shootings and death. I genuinely fear for my own life every night, as I work in that very neighborhood.

As for Walmart opening in Buffalo, retail here is a Zero-Sum Game: their business will necessarily be drawn from existing stores, and those stores will suffer to the exact degree that WalMart prospers. If other stores are forced to "shed" employees, they'll be forced to apply at WalMart.

replied to Buffaboy
Score: 3 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ps - Let Walmart rent the hideous gasometer on Elmwood, otherwise known as the new Burchfield-Penney museum. It's already more ugly than any WalMart, has a big parking lot built on "pristine land", and is much closer to potential clientelle than Hertel/Elmwood.

Score: -9 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the idea of a walmart moving in here. Its a little closer to the zoo for me and the exhibits are free!

Score: 9 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't think Buffalo needs a Wal-Mart at all. All it does is hurt small local retailers.

If you want an example just turn to Lockport, as soon as Wal-Mart went in the shops on main st seemed to close up overnight. They have however started coming back but its taken 10-15 years. Lockport also had a Mall before Wal-Mart went in, yes it was struggling a little but Wal-Mart was the final nail in the coffin.

There has to be a better use for that corner then a Wal-Mart.

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If you look at what the shops in Elmwood, or in North Buffalo offer, you find that they sell many things you cannot find at Walmart. That alone might protect the local businesses. K-mart, however might find itself in trouble.

replied to SBZ
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Absolutely… what No Illusions said.

The ship has long sailed for local stores trying to sell mostly the same products as chains but at higher prices. Even if Walmart isn't here, they still buy that stuff at Target, Big Lots, Dollar General, Wegmans, etc…..

But if they sell something more unique, they can do fine.

Elmwoodish examples are the micro beer store, vinegar store, custom t-shirt store, etc., etc.

replied to No_Illusions
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What specific products are you talking about? What are these products or services that small business are charging outrageous prices for?

The last time I shopped at Walmart was a long time ago and it was because I was in a small North Carolina town and it had the only open barbershop. And that haircut cost more than I would have paid my local barber. Every product that I need can be purchased at a local store for a reasonable price. Its very easy to avoid these big box discount stores. In most cities there are even mom and pop 99cent stores where you can buy your cheap imports at a local level if you want. Wegmans is a slightly different case than Walmart, Big Lots etc. because Wegmans offers premium and local products and has a good record with treating workers. All big box stores are not the same.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You raised two issues there. I'll reply in separate comments.

davvid>"What are these products or services that small business are charging outrageous prices for?"

The subjective description 'outrageous' is a word you brought up.
What I wrote said mostly and higher:
"The ship has long sailed for local stores trying to sell mostly the same products as chains but at higher prices. Even if Walmart isn't here, they still buy that stuff at Target, Big Lots, Dollar General, Wegmans, etc"

As to what the products are, they can be anything you and SBZ had in mind when your comments referred to small local businesseses in this comment
SBZ>"I don't think Buffalo needs a Wal-Mart at all. All it does is hurt small local retailers."
...and this one
davvid>"obliterating local small business economies".

So if you'd like, you two can tell me what kinds of products are sold at stores you had in mind regarding Buffalo/Elmwood-Hertel who'd be hurt or obliterated.
I could think of examples of small local stores with higher prices than national chains for the same products, but don't know if they'd be what you guys were thinking of. Same concept however.

Quick examples -
Elmwood's 24 Hour We-Never-Close store sells things at much higher prices than national chains (Target, Walmart, Wegmans, Big Lots, etc).
I don't think that one will be hurt Walmart because they've survived all the other national chains for so long. The added value they offer is a convenient location.
But maybe many years ago there were additional similar small local stores like that along Elmwood and the number of them have decreased.

On Hertel, wasn't there a greeting card store where Spot Coffee is now? Maybe that one couldn't successfully compete on price and convenience with big chains that sell cards in addition to many other products.
And maybe the local food market that was where Walgreens now is on Hertel is another example which couldn't compete on price and selection after Wegmans came along. Dash's survived, but maybe Wegmans resulted in decreasing the # of smaller local groceries in North Buff. All speculation, but there's some examples.
Did Hertel used to have a hardware store that didn't survive for very long after Home Depot's arrival? If so, that could be another.

On the other hand, stores selling more unique products can do fine. I mentioned Elmwood's stores for vinegar and custom t-shirts, and there's the Village specialty beer store. The cupcake store is another, along with the Poster Art store, Talking Leaves books, … on and on.
Those have added value by offering products & expertise the big chains don't.
Hertel examples -
Room furniture (and quite a few furniture/furnishing stores), Terrapin Station, Virgil tobacco, many ethnic specialty food stores on Hertel, ...

replied to davvid
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for the thoughtful response.

Walmart uses the very low prices on some products to draw customers into the store only for them to make other regular-priced purchases out of convenience or whatever impulse. So a dozen eggs or a case of beer may be cheaper elsewhere but it may not be worth a customer's time to travel to another store. When Walmart as one-stop shopping destination becomes part of a customers shopping habit it could certainly hurt any small business in the immediate area, even specialty shops like Terrapin Station. Terrapin loses if its potential customer spends his or her available cash or time at Walmart before even getting to Terrapin. Walmart is simply a siphon. Walmart drinks Terrapin's milkshake. And that siphoning out of local dollars could affect the economy in ways that are not always clear and direct.

We really shouldn't even lump Walmart in with smaller big box stores because its enormous size as a store and a system is unique. Secondly Walmart is much more aggressive about being a one-top shopping destination. Most customers wouldn't expect to get their haircut at Wegmans, or buy an outfit at Tops, or a TV at home depot.

I asked you before about specific "higher priced" products or services because I am very suspicious of the idea that consumers are saving money because of Walmart. There is a kind of conservative notion out there, which I disagree with, that Walmart shoppers are simply being rational and always choosing the cheapest prices. My guess is that there is very little price difference between walmart and local stores on many basic items.

On the labor/wage issue, I think Walmart gets crapped on the most because it is by far the biggest offender. Walmart is operating at a scale all its own and it is the primary force on the global stage that is driving down wages everywhere it does business and forcing companies to move to China in order to compete. There have also been some high profile accusations of limiting advancement and retaliation against worker trying to organize.

I do agree with you that there should be more pressure on Target and other retailers in the US to raise wages. As you probably know there is a perception that retail work is primarily for high school or college students and that it isn't like a "real" job.

replied to whatever
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think pretty much we're at an impasse so I'll just make a general point.

Many of those things are done by other retailers too and no doubt were done even before Walmart became huge. For example, having a few low priced items at a time to attract shoppers who they hope once in the store also buy other stuff instead of at other stores. I'd never heard it called a 'siphon', but you can call it that. The specialty retailers can do the same however - if some customers happen to stop at say Terrapin before going to Walmart they might make impulse purchases at the former and have less to spend at the latter.

Retail has always been a very competitive industry. Actually most industries are, but with retail is in the public eye so much.

If Walmart had never existed, some other co would be the market leader and be thus be under the microscope - like Microsoft for a long time was/is in software, and so on.

It isn't unusual for any industry's leader to dominate in size far above 2nd and 3rd place for a while, so if Walmart had never happened then Target or Sears or whoever would have the same opportunities to flex muscles as Walmart does now. It's likely there'd be similar kinds of criticisms of whoever is #1 at this point in history (with today's technology, China, etc). The management 'talent' who Walmart has hired to innovate the practices which some don't like would have instead been hired by Target, etc and put many of the same ideas in place.

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You also mentioned worker treatment.

Why is Walmart is criticized for wages massively more than Target which as of 2011 pays over 7% less on average?
According to The Atlantic....
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/IBISWorld_Big_Box_Retail.PNG
as of 2011 these were the average hourly wages, lowest-to-highest
Kohls $8.02, Target $8.13, Walmart $8.81, Best Buy $9.67, Home Depot $11.77
(some others are in that chart too)
From that article
"Walmart...says it pays full time sales associates $11.75 an hour on average. But independent analysis peg the figure much lower, closer to $9.
According to IBISWorld, that puts it a bit behind companies like Home Depot and Lowes, but ahead of its nearest competitor, Target, which has managed to put a more fashionable face on the same abysmal pay for its workers."


Might the reason be that Target is preferred over Walmart for shopping by a larger portion of progressives - so they're more hesitant to criticize Target's wages even if lower than Walmart's?
Just asking. I don't know what the reason is.

And we don't know what wages or other treatment issues are at small local stores.

From the govt side of things, the minimum wage (& other labor laws) should apply the same to all businesses regardless of type or size.
If a political majority wants the min wage to be raised, that's much more reasonable than to single out Walmart or even the retail industry - especially when Target is by comparison immune from the same criticism.

From consumer side, people can consider worker wages when deciding. If they want to buy something at Home Depot or Best Buy instead of Walmart or Target with motivation being that HD or BB pays workers more - that's fine. Or if they want to still buy from small/local whenever possible, they can do that too.

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am reading today that Walmart plans to start denying workers health insurance if their hours drop below 30hrs. Walmart is essentially shifting the burden of workers who do not make enough to afford healthcare over to the federal gov't and taxpayers.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/01/walmart-health-care-policy-medicaid-obamacare_n_2220152.html

"Labor and health care experts portrayed Walmart’s decision to exclude workers from its medical plans as an attempt to limit costs while taking advantage of the national health care reform known as Obamacare...

“Walmart likely thought it didn’t need to offer this part-time coverage anymore with Obamacare,” said Nelson Lichtenstein, director of the Center for the Study of Work, Labor and Democracy at the University of California, Santa Barbara. “This is another example of a tremendous government subsidy to Walmart via its workers.”

In pursuing lower health care costs, Walmart is following the same course as many other large employers. But given its unrivaled scale, Walmart’s policies tend to influence American working conditions more broadly."

replied to whatever
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Regarding co's dropping people to under 30 hrs now that there's more stringent federal laws about each employee over 30 hrs/week -
Although for some laws, unintended consequences can be difficult to predict, I think for that one the consequence was widely predicted to happen for many businesses.

Even if Walmart ended all health coverage for part time workers, they'd become in that way like most employers who don't either - even most large employers.

As I said, govts and laws should treat Walmart the same as other businesses - no better, no worse. If they follow the law and some don't like the result, then maybe there will be efforts to try changing the law again.

Is the health coverage for part-time workers question ever asked of Buffalo's locally owned businesses? Why more controversial for only the biggest national retail co and not for part time workers at local-owned? The latter are people too. If someone works part time at a local store or cafe, etc which doesn't provide health coverage, and ends up enrolling in a govt safety net program - that isn't complained about as a govt subsidy to that local business… but why not?
What's the difference to the govt or the person?

When covering locally owned stores, restaurants, cafes, galleries, and so on, should this blog start asking for that info and include it at ends of articles under the street addresses?

Will it be ironic if anybody was proud to not shop at a national retailer in protest of part time workers not being provided health coverage, but then spends instead at a local retailer who provides even less to its workers?

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just think after Wal-Mart builds, ten years later we will have new vacant building on that site or a HUGE dollar store.

Score: 9 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

as long as population and disposable income are falling instead of rising, there is no net economic gain when walmart enters a local economy. opening a new big box here just means closing an older one there, wiping out locally-owned businesses along the way. no new jobs will be created.

here is how walmart affected chicago, which is much more prosperous than we are:

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2012/09/radiating-death-how-walmart-displaces-nearby-small-businesses/3272/

Score: 12 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Walmart pressures companies to charge it less for items or will cease carrying. It resulted in the end of Rubbermaid as we knew it (since merged with Newell and buckled to Walmart demands), has caused companies to move production out of the US to lower production costs and meet Walmart demands (see Spangler candy canes), and countless others. And yet, Walmart is often not the lowest cost provider for items. It just sells more because perception is that everything is cheaper. One of my favorite pieces on Walmart is a Frontline series from 8 years ago. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/etc/script.html . I will say that Walmart has given me an experience no other store anywhere else ever has: my cashier was led out in handcuffs in the middle of my sales transaction on one of the few occasions I bought something there.

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wal Mart's business model is based on exploiting employees, suppliers, and the workers that produce the products they sell. The "falling prices" they advertise are directly related to falling wages, moving production to third world countries, and putting pressure on suppliers to cut wages even further. Wal Mart is in the extraction business, extracting wealth from a community while returning little to nothing. Just another example of a corporation that adds to the great disparity in wealth and keeps America workers from prospering.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We just looked into acquiring the former Dickie's Donuts location at Elmwood & Hertel.

Wal-Mart possibly moving into that area means we won't be.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you going to bless this region with REAL Mexican food?

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't know if I would use the word blessing, but yes, that's one hole in the Buffalo food scene we'd really like to be the ones to fill. We found a couple of other interesting concepts while we were living in Minneapolis/St. Paul that would be a nice fit here.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

An authentic Mexican restaurant would fit nicely down here in Lower Black Rock. The Sun Asian Restaurant (authentic) at Niagara and Austin has been very successful here and has expanded their dining room. There are a couple of storefronts on the east side of Niagara St between Amherst and Hamilton. One was the long time home of Georges Texas Hots. This location is highly visible and always seemed to be popular, might want to consider checking it out.

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We're looking really hard at a couple of spots in Grant/Ferry and Black Rock. I've been meaning to pick your brain about your 'hood actually. We're pretty well settled into the house now, so my main focus is trying to get a location under contract as soon after the new year as possible. I'll send you an e-mail.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For what purpose?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I thought Tim Hortons bought the former Dickie's Donuts location last summer?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I heard recently that property may be in play again. Could be a rumor though.

replied to bung
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wal-Mart business model is to extort government, impoverish third world nations and have sexual intercourse with underage women. Last time I enter a Wal-Mart, the greeter attempted to rape me. I enjoyed it, but I'm sure others do not.

Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

come on. level with us. You didn't really enjoy the sodomy but you sort of had to say you did otherwise...you know. I'm just saying...we all have to make decisions.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I thought the whole experience was ironic.

replied to davvid
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A Walmart greeter actually raping an American consumer would be ironic.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yet cliche.

replied to davvid
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You are such a disappointment.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well Davvid, since you were my greeter, so were you.

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And you're not even man enough to actually reply to my last comment.

replied to Postermaster
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Time to thumbs up yourself again and rip into a PBR...

replied to davvid
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In ten or twelve years from now you will be reading on Buffalo Rising. Developer Rocco Termini is planning on buying The former Wal-Mart building on Elmwood near Hertel. It will be a mix of residential plus commercial space and utilize historic preservation tax credits. If Wal-mart is still in that location twelve years from now, that would be historic!

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Look at the post from "buffaloroam" where he/she says "whenever I'm back in Buffalo with someone new I enjoy showing them that site." Isn't that nice: bringing new people to an underdeveloped area of Buffalo and show them something to laugh at. We don't need that kind of public relations. I mean seriously. Where do you live now? Let me guess: Chicago, LA, Miami, Tampa, Atlanta, New York, DC, or some other World Class city?

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If Walmart must come into Buffalo, I wish they'd tear down the Kmart and build there. I live in the area, and while I'd prefer not to see Walmart move into my neighborhood, I realize such things are out of my control. Given that, I'd welcome other development that Walmart could bring to the area. Say, a new permanent North Buffalo library? Not in a Kmart strip mall? A Trader Joe's on the SW corner of Hertel & Delaware? I hope the small businesses in the area benefit from this - like The Kitchen Table, just across the street, a small restaurant with yummy, inexpensive food, and the hardest working owner you'll find. There are 3 "adult" toy/video shops near that corner - I'd take a Walmart over these stores.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

P.S. This is what happens when someone demands an exorbitant price for a piece of property. The only fish in town that can afford it is Walmart. If Walmart goes in, I'm betting on a Panera + Chipotle on the SW corner. I noticed a Panera billboard on Amherst & Elmwood - seems out of place when the nearest one is quite a bit North on Sheridan. Maybe they're testing the waters?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I thought Panera was going where Blockbuster is in Elmwood.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment