Real Estate October 1, 2012 12:15 AM

Seneca Street Project to Help Bridge Larkin District and Downtown

Seneca Street Project to Help Bridge Larkin District and Downtown
Savarino Companies and FFZ Holdings have further refined their plans for the renovation of the former F.N. Burt Company plant at 500 Seneca Street.  The vacant industrial complex at the edge of the Larkin District will be converted into a mix of offices and cultural and business incubator space.  Revised plans include more subtle balconies for office tenants, an amazing sign on the southwest corner of the building, and enclosed parking.  



500SenecaDSC_0379.JPG500SenecaB.jpg
The primary entrance to the complex will be located on the western end of the building closest to downtown.  It will feature a three-story lobby.  There will be two courtyards in the building.  One at the eastern end of the block will span all six floors and be open air.  It will be an amenity for the building's tenants and help bring additional natural light into the building's office floors.   A second courtyard on the western end of the block will be enclosed and run from the third to the sixth floor (below).  A cafeteria is planned for the third floor with seating available in the atrium.  

500SenecaE.jpg
Floors will be large, ideal for back-office or tech companies desiring offices on one or just a few floors.  Floor sizes range from 54,600 sq.ft. on the second floor to 14,250 sq.ft. on the sixth.  The first floor will contain 48,900 sq.ft. and floors three through five will each have 45,600 sq.ft.
500SenecaD.jpg
Offices will feature loft-style finishes with large exterior windows.  Balconies are planned for the western façade facing downtown and can be added elsewhere if tenants desire them.  Architectural firm Chaintreuil Jensen Stark is designing the project.  Preservation Studios is handling the tax credit certification work.

Savarino Companies president and chief executive officer Sam Savarino says the project will not be geared towards luring tenants out of the central business district.  Rather, he says that like the nearby Larkin District office buildings, 500 Seneca's large floor plates, proximity to downtown and the I-190, and free parking will attract firms that may otherwise locate in the suburbs.

Savarino is confident the project will be successful and will begin work even though no tenants have signed on as of yet.

"We've had some pretty good discussions with potential tenants," says Savarino.  "We will be starting on spec and have space available six months after construction starts."  

The F.N. Burt Company, a paper box manufacturer, constructed the complex as a series of buildings between 1901 and 1927.  It is highly visible from the I-190 and occupies nearly the full block bound by Myrtle Avenue and Hamburg, Spring and Seneca streets. 

The developers purchased the vacant structure from New Era Cap Co. in March 2010.  New Era moved out in 2004 when it consolidated its local manufacturing facilities at a plant in Derby.

When first purchased, Savarino thought the iconic brick building with wood floors and columns at the corner of Seneca and Hamburg streets would need to be demolished due to its poor condition.  The developers were urged to utilize historic preservation tax credits to make reuse of this portion of the complex feasible.

"We went back and recalibrated," says Savarino.  "It made sense economically to save.  It's marginal, but we will be able to save it.  We'll be in there shoring up that section of the property over the coming weeks.  I don't think it would last another winter without some help."

The development team is also buying 550 Seneca Street.  That building, across Hamburg Street from the F.N. Burt complex is currently under contract.  Plans call for reusing that building for parking for 148 cars (lot 'D' below).
500SenecaC.jpg
There will also be a surface parking lot along Myrtle Avenue, a small lot near the front entrance, and a large lot between Seneca and Exchange streets.  Plans for that lot are contingent on finalizing an agreement with Graphic Controls and the City that control the parcel.  Savarino Companies and FFZ Holdings would enter into a long-term lease for the land with the City.

The developers will present their plans to the community prior to heading to the Buffalo Planning Board for approvals.  That meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 16 at the Old First Ward Community Center.  It will be held from 6 until 8 pm.    

Work on the project is expected to begin next spring, but could start sooner if an anchor signs on before then.  Tenants could be taking occupancy seven months after construction starts.
 
Get Connected: Julia Spitz, Savarino Cos, 716.332.5959 

IMG_0631.jpg
IMG_0627.JPG

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Looks awesome!!!

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BRIGHT LIGHTS BIG REHAB!!

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I absolutely LOVE that picture of the inside. I really hope that design follows through!

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hats off to Mr Savarino for working with the Preservation Board to re-use the entire building, not just the newer portion. His use of Historic Tax credits made this economically feasible.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RE: the idea that this project will not draw tenants from downtown but rather compete with suburban offices. On its face this assertion sounds silly, but it's more true than it seems.

Larkin is very competitive with suburban office parks, much more so than I imagined it would be. It has much of the same feel as those contemporary competitors. Right off the highway exit, plenty of parking right outside the building, it has that get in, park, get out sensibility to it which many commuters find attractive. I think Savarino is correct that shoppers for suburban office space who are not attracted to the downtown core may well find this complex appealing.

Score: 13 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While its great that they aren't looking to pirate from the Downtown core, and this is good for the City, as a region we need new jobs - not relocated jobs from the City to Suburbia or Suburbia to the City.

More people in the City. More people in the Burbs. Creating housing or commercial stock to create a vacancy in another neighborhood or area is really a wash. We just maintain.

Hopefully, one day we can get away from this mentality.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What an inspiring/inspired project.

How I wish there were another daylight factor available closer to downtown ready for such a reuse.........oh, wait..........

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...wait, no hotel component??

Score: 9 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a great extension on the redevelopment of the Larkin District.
Find out more about surrounding developments here.

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How about some of the hipsters move into the surrounding areas? Valley, Ward, Hydrolics. Much safer, nicer than the East Side that everyone here is trying to push.
Peg from the Valley Center has recruited at least 3 young couples to move to The Valley.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. I did my studio in the Old First Ward and I was surprised by the sense of community one still feels walking around the streets. The dense, village-like housing and corner commercial buildings are all still largely intact. You're walking distance to the river and two new riverfront parks. It will be interesting to see how the Perry Choice Neighborhood Initiative helps bridge the gap between either side of South Park.

replied to BFLOwatch
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am a sucker for a good rendering!

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great project and I wish them the best on it and alot of balls to move forward without someone signing on ....It will be nice to have someone move from the burbs to the city location adn bring a few hundred jobs but in the end, it would be nicer to bring in a company from outside the area to bring in new jobs and who knows?

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you Mr. Savarino for hearing those damned obstructionist preservationists:)

Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Back in the 1980s, Chicago had a district that was similar to this part of Buffalo. It was rundown, unsafe, lots of empty lots and mostly drug dealers and other undesireables.

Still, it was in a good location, just minutes from downtown, and there was some good housing stock nearby, and enough original tenants to keep the place hanging on. Then, during the late 80s, some gentifiers starting moving in. Slowly, over the next 15 years, things started to change, and today it's one of Chicago's best neighorhoods. It's called Wrightwood, and my sister was one of the first to move in the area back then. All the warehouse space has been converted to shopping and offices, all the spaces have been filled with small plazas and short strip malls (that sounds bad, but it actually works since it's a healthy mix, and you do need small spaces for boutiques).

Big box stores love the area and filled in the larger spaces. Today, it's highly desireable.

If we can keep things going, this section of town can indeed compete with the suburbs and become a hip new place that will revitalize the surrounding area.

What's great about Wrightwood is that there was enough of the old immigrant parts (think German, Polish and so on) that it has helped the old stores survive and even thrive. This could be great if they bring in Polonia and fuse them all together.

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They should be trying to do something similar with the TRICO Building

Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Amen!

replied to paulsobo
Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

An interior courtyard for the Trico would resolve alot of issues that they using to justify demolition.

Buffalo has a long list of buildings with interior courtyards so why does this need to be a novel idea for TRICO?

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is something to keep an eye on. The demand and activity for tenants with this size floor plates will be similar to the ones Paladino wanted for his Webster Block proposal. Let's see ho much interest in draws up...

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

it makes no sense whatsoever to demolish old daylight factories. they are usually built formidably well and when you unbrick the windows, the light is fantastic. hats off to savarino & co.

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This lobby looks amazing. Lets hope that it turns out that way.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This project is awesome. They should now consider ECC for the Larkin district. Potential college community.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Anyone that thinks the Larkin District is doing anything other than reducing occupacy in the CBD is kidding themselves. You may like the restoration of these old buildings but they do more damage than good by preventing the CBD from stabilizing itself, especially in the face of nearly a million SF of space that is about to be dumped on the market at the HSBC center.

The Larkin District is as tragic as locating UB in Amherst, or having 3 separate ECC campuses or a football stadium in OP... the list goes on and on.

Score: -11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@yea right: except the larkin districts largest occupant moved in from Amherst not the CBD and has been creating jobs there not just moving them there. So how many companies have vacated CBD space for the larkin district?

replied to yea right
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Where are all the people against surface lots and the suburban design of the Seneca Casino?

Essentially, what you are creating downtown Larkin is a suburban office park with free parking on surface lots. Yes you have a building built to the sidewalk but surrounded by parking lots. Its still creates an island effect. While this is ok and applauded in Larkin why is it not ok for the Seneca design? Put the casino pro/con debate aside and limit the debate only the merits of the architectual design please.

I re-affirm the hope that we can start pilfering companies not from the surrounding areas (read suburbs) but from other cities and areas as well with cheap and available ready space providing new money, new jobs, maybe even new people to the region as an entirety.

It also tells you we need to create additional residences in and around the down town core areas for people to live in. People want to go to work and go home. I don't think this is unique to any city. Keeping people DT requires people live DT.

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let's start with the fact that the Senecas demolished the H-O silos. These were Buffalo landmarks that should have been saved.

And, if you think there is not much difference between the Seneca Casino and the Larkin district rehabs, no amount of explaining on my part will convince you otherwise.

replied to MikeN
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What I am speaking to is the architectual design or urban planning if you will - essentially a building surrounded by a bunch of surface lots to provide free parking for tenants and guests.

Everyone was in a dither about a building surrounded by surface lots casino design. In this case, a building (yes rehabbed vs new build) but surrounded by surface lots.

Pretty hypocritcal considering the constant drum beating for density and over population of surface lots everywhere else. I raise the question as to why this is. I don't have the answer but I do find it pretty hypocritical.

But then again I've also been voted down for voicing a regional cooperation instead of fighting over the same crumbs.

I am not surprised by the arrogant its your problem when in fact you are the one who missed the entire context of the question.

replied to hamp
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Saved for what? An industrial romanticist fantasy world? the silos are dead and rotting away. No amount of festival lighting or festooning can conceal their decrepitude.

replied to hamp
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

@Mark Hitch

You can start with Harris Beach and Kavinoky Cook. Not sure but probably Robert Half too. Those are some direct examples. But you have to look at where these companies would have gone absent this cut rate, shadow CBD. First Niagara in particular (read: Lockport Savings) would absolutely have moved to the CBD as it morphed from a sleepy S&L to fairly large, painfully under-performing commercial bank. But the lure of super cheap ($14 gross) office space convinced it to move to the Larkin District.

Bottom Line, no Larkin District, 600K higher occupancy in the CBD. Typical Buffalo: divide and be conquered.

Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Makes sense. For every brick laid in the Larkin District, a puppie dies downtown. The only solution is to stop all construction everywhere at all costs.

replied to yea right
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is the same developer preservationists are bashing because he wants to tear down that hideous Erie Freighthouse. Yet they fail to realize projects like this that are preserving and repairing historic red brick structures like this big industrial warehouse on Seneca Street. I would like to see plans to renovate and reuse three old warehouse buildings on Seneca between Elm Street and Michigan Avenue. But first in order to make those last remaining warehouses on Seneca more marketable, that hidoeous, unneeded Elm Street overpass bridge has to be demolished and Elm Street brought to grade level at Seneca Street.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment