City October 5, 2012 9:41 AM

Ohio Street: The Situation is Now

Ohio Street: The Situation is Now
Buffalo is engaged in an evolutionary process. Visionaries are finding ways to activate formally dormant districts, and centers of activity are emerging around the city, in a variety of neighborhoods. The city is in the process of retooling and inventing it's future.  A linked situation is evolving, informed by the lessons of the past, fueling innovation, moving forward.  At this crucial time it is essential to analyze and assess the city's re-emergence, the Situation is Now.  
    
The debate on the status of the city is an ongoing project, for sure. Avoiding rigid perceptions, let's for a moment explore a dynamic vision of what the city might be if only we stretched our imagination.  To envision strategies of performative urbanism that could contain a hybrid of inventive design, and shared public flexibility.

Ohio Street is a fantastic and exceptional performative catalyst.  At the very least it is a historical armature that linked the grain silos and river to outside markets.  Arguably, what the Highline is to New York City, Ohio Street holds similar if not greater potential for Buffalo.  In essence the transformation of an infrastructural artifact into a seemingly unexpected, spontaneous, and economically sustainable urban conduit. 

Ohio Street is a core urban artery linking Canalside to the potential of the First Ward, to the Buffalo River, Cobblestone District, Downtown, Silo City, Ship Canal, the Outer Harbor and Lake Erie: an expansive and distinguished catalog of neighborhoods best explored traveling via Ohio Street. The mile long ride is book ended by Rigidized Metals Corporation and Silo City, an ideal, welcoming environment of creativity and culture, and to the north the historic Swannie House, and Fire Boat Cotter. 

Design-Circuit-Buffalo-Rising-2.jpg
Ohio street is currently made up of a string of disconnected but well used green spaces, interspersed with industrial buildings currently emerging as residential and commercial development sites. In short the future of Ohio Street and the First Ward has begun. There is boundless potential for Ohio Street as participating in the new linkages between community, history, culture, and the waterfront.

Design-Circuit-Buffalo-Rising-5.jpg
At this exciting time we at designcircuit.org have joined forces with Buffalo Rising to organize a design forum that we hope will help reveal new possibilities for Ohio Street.   We have asked a panel of speakers and are inviting the public to bring their expertise to the conversation to explore the relevance and importance of Canalside, Ohio Street, and the Outer Harbor; to better understand the situation in the context of the current state of Buffalo's evolution, from the point of view a city planner, theorist, journalist, community leader, historian, designer, and the everyday user.  Each panelist examines the city, and the themes (conditions) embedded within a typology of urbanism, from a specific point of view.  There is boundless potential for Ohio Street as an agent in linking community, history, culture, and the waterfront. Our goal is to facilitate discussion amongst the panelist and audience, to share ideas, and promote activity that enables growth to build up Buffalo.

Buffalo-City-Map-01-design-NY.jpg
 
The format for this discussion is a round table panel presentation and discussion, and panelists are:
 
Robert Shibley, Dean UB School of Architecture - Moderator
Sam Hoyt, ECHDC - Panelist
Mark Goldman, Community Leader - Panelist
Mike Puma, Buffalo Rising - Panelist
Chris Hawley, Historian - Panelist
William Haskas, HD Systems Design - Panelist

Design-Circuit-Buffalo-Rising-3.jpg
 
Location:
First Ward Community Center
62 Republic Street
Buffalo, NY 14204
 
Date and Time:
Thursday, October 18, 2012
7-8:30pm
Free and Open to the Public
All interested in the city are invited to attend
 
For additional information on the panelists, and the topics of their presentations please visit: www.designcircuit.org


View image

Comments

Leave a comment

yes. yes. yes.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah, I loves me some word salad too. Gods, what a bunch of high-minded crapulence. Any time you read the phrase "boundless potential" you should turn around and go get a beer instead, it'll be more productive.

"In essence the transformation of an infrastructural artifact into a seemingly unexpected, spontaneous, and economically sustainable urban conduit."

In essence, that ain't even a complete sentence.

replied to GroveyClevesYall
Score: -4 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

yeah, you're right. how about this gem?

"To envision strategies of performative urbanism that could contain a hybrid of inventive design, and shared public flexibility."

clearly, we have a buzzword bingo champion here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword_bingo

replied to Jesse
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Awesome!

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank GOD. Our leaders can't think strategically, thereby leaving it to the grassroots efforts. This is great, great news (a la Canal Side "faster, quicker, cheaper).

It seems merely coincidental that this comes out only day(s) after the Freight House announcement. How timely.

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nice , but nothing will replace the need of a bridge to connect the inner and outer harbor

Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Bingo!!! This is cool, as an add on. But, let's not loose sight of the main goal, a bridge connecting the inner and outer harbor!

replied to Rcc
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

God, there is so much potential with this street going towards the outer harbor.........residential, commercial, already a new park...find money to clean up the softball fields and park area...bike paths, sidewalks, a cleaned up Buffalo River and access...great views of the Grain Elevators......Can we say FAST TRACK....We have been taking this route instead of the SKY way to get to the outer harbor for years now and other than bumpy ad ugly it isnt bad...With the new beachfront and volleyball courts and park areas the vision and potential is endless....Now we need new jobs to come into there area, young people etc...I guess thats the hard part......

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The one thing I would change is the moderator. Shibley is frozen in time and I would be concerned about him steering the conversation toward a very familiar place. Also, Shibley has his hand in every large scale design and planning initiative locally. Can we please switch it up a bit? If we can't get someone local, bring in someone from Toronto or New York.

Score: 6 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Could not agree more. Shibley is a huge contributor to the stagnation in Buffalo's architecture scene.

I'd hate to see him co-opt this, very exciting, movement.

replied to davvid
Score: 3 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

couldn't disagree more. Shibley is exceptionally competent.

He has been leading the charge for more urban, European style development downtown for decades. He can't force change by himself, but he's illuminated the path numerous times. All you who desire parking ramps disguised by storefronts and apartments or offices, for example, should see his plans 20 years ago for the M&T parking lot between St. Michael's and Chippewa. And he's presented many other ideas, one example of which is mimicking old city centers (narrow, winding pedestrian oriented streets between rows of shops in multistory multi-use buildings) in new developments downtown. He been a champion of many types of traffic calming. These are only a few that I'm familiar with. He has a ton of credibility (and not just because he's the dean of the architecture school).

In my experience, Shibley truly 'gets it' when it comes to the pedestrian experience and urban sensibility. Plus he's a very good moderator by temperament.

replied to davvid
Score: 5 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Its great that we have moved on from the old Buffalo approach to development and urbanism,and Shibley certainly helped Buffalo make that change, but now is not the time to become entrenched again in another way of thinking. I do not see how we benefit from having one man (and a very political one) dominate urban design the way Shibley does.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Gave you a thumbs up because I can agree that he is the first and only choice usually, and there ought to be others cultivated. He does do this kind of thing a lot.

But I don't see him as political. He seems to have a good working relationship with whoever is in charge, be it Brown or Masiello before him, or various Common Council members, but working with whoever is in charge politically is not in itself political. I don't know his political agenda. I'm not even sure how designing a street could be construed as political in nature. Perhaps you would helpfully expand your criticism and explain what you mean when you characterize Shibley as too political.

replied to davvid
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Love this! Ohio Street really does have some great potential!

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ohio street is fascinating. what makes it so compelling is its industrial past. it was never an ornamental avenue of leisure, it was a place of blood, sweat, tears, noise, machines, trains, ships, and hard work.

that is why i am disappointed by the tree-lined boulevard plans that have been floated recently. must every place look like an olmsted park or parkway? olmsted is a good model for public space but it is not the only possible or appropriate model. sort of like deciding that every neglected building has to look like the guaranty or martin house.

Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's good to see someone finally taking the community's input into consideration.
Check out more recent developments and their historical background here.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Community? There is no individual property owner or even neighborhood-local activist on that panel. I have to agree with some unfavorable comments about the dud-ness of this event. The good graphics almost got me.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Also, in the second map, why does it say "Delaware Park" right over Downtown?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looking at that map, it seems dumb not to bring back the bridge at Michigan Ave.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's nice to see so many white men get the chance to offer their opinion.

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Finally progress with the Ohio St. corridor. Nobody has mentioned the Michigan Ave. route that once connected downtown to right under the skyway. There was a small 2-lane bridge that once continued through. Never replaced in the 1960s. Instead property sold or whatever and given purpose for sailboat parking lot. This access could and should of been used for quick access to outer harbor and what was once Times Beach.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great things always have humble beginnings. Before everyone froths over with exhuberance about the possibilities, Ohio St needs the basics: decent, relatively affordable housing, safety, and more and better infrastructure. The really good stuff will certainly follow but first things first...

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment