Regional September 28, 2012 1:25 PM

Politics Are Brewing at 7-Eleven

Politics Are Brewing at 7-Eleven

Every four years, some things happen like clockwork - leap year, the summer and winter Olympic games, U.S. presidential elections, and with it, 7-Eleven®'s 7-Election™ Presidential Coffee Cup Poll. 

In past years, millions of everyday Americans have participated in the 7-Election vote as they go about their daily routines. While many states offer early voting that typically begins a few days before Election Day (Tuesday, Nov. 6), the 2012 7-Election voting started really early, on Sept. 6.

Billed as unabashedly unofficial and unscientific, 7-Election invites customers to vote by selecting specially marked coffee cups, blue for President Barack Obama and red for former Gov. Mitt Romney. 7-Eleven's regular "nonpartisan" cups are also available for undecided customers or those who would rather not publicize their presidential preference. Patriotic coffee-drinkers can vote at participating 7-Eleven stores as early and as often as they want in the two months leading up to the national election.

 Here in Erie County Democratic Party Committee Chairman Leonard R. Lenihan and Republican Party Committee Chairman Nicholas A. Langworthy will share a good-hearted coffee toast with their corresponding cups during the press event.

7-Election cups are instantly tabulated at the register when the sale is made. National, state and major market results will be posted daily on www.7-election.com, a website created especially for the coffee-cup poll. Poll tallies will reflect the percentage of candidate cups sold to date, not including 7-Eleven's regular ("undecided") cups. Participating 7-Eleven stores are encouraged to post their stores' latest race results at the hot beverage islands.

As of this morning, Obama leads Romney nationally by a 58 percent to 45 percent margin.  In New York State the current count is Obama 55 percent, Romney 45 percent.

Each day, almost 7 million Americans visit our neighborhood stores on their way to work, after school or while they're out and about. Around 1 million of those purchase a cup of 7-Eleven coffee," said 7-Eleven, Inc. President and CEO Joe DePinto. "While we have never billed 7-Election as scientific or statistically valid, it is astounding just how accurate this simple count-the-cups poll has been - election after election.  We have had a lot of fun with it, and I hope we encourage people to vote in the real election."

"This should be a fun and exciting event for our Western New York customers," said Mark Senay, senior director of operations for 7-Eleven stores in the Buffalo and Rochester markets.  "We encourage them to vote early and often by selecting their favorite candidate's cup."

Over the past year, 7-Eleven has seen a huge expansion locally through acquisition and conversion of Wilson Farms stores to 7-Elevens, as well as opening of new locations.

Since 2000, 7-Eleven "coffee cup-voters" have successfully predicted the winner in each presidential election giving 7-Election a better track record than some well-known statistically valid polls.  Past 7-Election results compared to actual vote tallies were:

7-11election.JPG7-Eleven customers also will see the return of vanilla-flavored "Purple for the People" Slurpee® drinks at participating 7-Eleven stores, billed as a "peace-maker" beverage to unite the country. During the contentious mid-term 2010 elections, 7-Eleven created the unifying purple drink to symbolically unite the red and blue sides of the political spectrum.

7-Eleven was the first U.S. retailer to offer fresh-brewed coffee in to-go cups back in the mid 1960s. It proved an instant success. Customers liked fixing their coffee the way they wanted it - choosing cup size, regular or decaffeinated, and adding sweeteners and creamers to suit their tastes. Today, 7-Eleven sells more fresh-brewed coffee than anything else - 1 million cups per day. In each of the past 7-Election polls, more than 6 million candidate cups were cast.

While a nonpartisan beverage enjoyed by Democrats and Republicans alike, coffee does have deep political roots in American history. In 1607, Captain John Smith in Virginia introduced coffee in America, and it was named the national beverage by the First Continental Congress after the Boston Tea Party.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Mitt Romney says 47% of coffee drinkers see themselves as victims and he can't convince them to take responsibilty for their own habit. He wonders why they need to be enabled by 7-Eleven and can't get their coffee from their household staff. How can Romney win when all these lazy coffee drinkers refuse to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and start a business with their inherited money like he did?

Score: 4 ( 32 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right! I'm trying to inherit some money myself. Also, Lenihan looks like he's got pincers. WTF?

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

His hands look like the penguins a little bit.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Really? Buffalo Rising schilling for 7-Eleven? Super effort cutting and pasting 7-Eleven's press release! IMO 7-Eleven (insert word starting with "s" and rhyming with mucks). Where is Leslie Knope when you need her?

Score: 1 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Im fine with articles like this...if they were labeled as sponsored articles/advertisements. Buffalo Rising is a free publication. They have to make money somehow.

replied to BuffaloRox
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Screw 7-11. Where's the Gary Johnson cup?

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Forget the red vs. blue cup promotion, every coffee drinker needs to spend five minutes on this link:

http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/EW5IdwltaAc?rel=0

Pretty sad state of affairs, made worse by the fact that NEITHER side wants to offer any more than tired sound-bites and threadbare ideology. America needs to wake up.

Sacred social social programs are not sustainable, nor are sacred tax cuts. If interest rates rise (and they will), the pain accelerates: If policies leading to jobs creation and growth actually occur, then the tax revenues generated will ease the sting for a little while. Either way, lots of work to be done.

Drink up!

Score: -1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That guy sounds like Ned from South Park.

replied to Jimbuffalo
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not sure which is worse, the figures reported, or the fact that 51% of the country doesn't really care. I caught myself looking at the tax rates in other countries today, never thought I'd seriously consider leaving, but it may be coming to that.

replied to Jimbuffalo
Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Byebye.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Where would you move to? Much of the first world is not doing so great now. Certain developing countries are doing great but lack many amenities we take advantage of. Also i hope you have a skill that is in demand. Work visas are not easy to get.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Taxes under President Obama are at the lowest point in my lifetime, I think we need to raise taxes on the non productive class that live off unearned income. You know, the entitled folks that pay less of a percentage of their "earnings" than do those that actually work for a living.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You'll get your wish January 1. Dividends go to a regular income tax rate, capital gains goes from 15 to 20 percent. The estate tax goes to 55% after 1 million dollars. So much for saving for your kids.

My issue with our countries current economic policy is not based on what will happen over the next months or years. It's the damage it does 20, 30, and 50 years out. We've eliminated much suffering over the years by growing the economy, lifting everyone. Growing the economy at 4% per year for 25 years improves life for everyone. Most economists say you get there by eliminating capital gains, and letting America do what it does best, innovate.

The other view is to say the pie is as big as it's going to get. I need more, now, therefore you can do with less.

By focusing on America's middle class, we're basically saying to the other six billion people on the planet, screw you. The left creates the warm fuzzy illusion, but in my opinion, it's selfish. Screw the next few generations, to hell with the truly poor in the rest of the world, I'm out to get mine.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. We should scrap those unsustainable programs and go back to being sharecroppers and indentured servants. I mean, who needs a middle class when we could be doing our part for the makers. It's what the market and the job creators want.

Now pass me one of those big gulp pops that the Democrats are trying to ban.

replied to Jimbuffalo
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Social programs can be sustainable, and our society is better off because of them. Our social welfare programs need to be reformed, not axed...unless you are proud to live in a country that has a 30-40% poverty rate like in the 1950s.

What is not sustainable is a military industrial complex + tax cuts + an inefficient welfare system.

However i do agree that bipartisanship is at ridiculous levels and both parties need to come back down to earth.

replied to Jimbuffalo
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I dont understand this...its not uniquely Buffalo. I agree doesnt even qualify as news really...perhaps special interest.

ok...moving on to the next article

Score: 1 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

this was the most 'USA TODAY' thing I've seen posted here.

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

At "my" 7-11 (Grant and Auburn), Blue Cups were gone on Friday before 9. People used regular 7-11 cups for their coffee. A big stack of Romney cups remained. Their going to have to ships those cups out to Clarence if they are ever going to see coffee.

Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I had a similar experience to Rev. Drew, at a "different" 7-Eleven. Better Dead than Red.

BTW, the day I say "my" 7-Eleven I hope someone shoots me & puts me out of my misery ;-)

Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i never thought i'd say this, but 7-11 makes me miss wilson farms.

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

http://www.usadebtclock.com
United States National Debt $16,027,550,301,350.19
United States National Debt Per Person $50,928.77
United States National Debt Per Household $131,905.52
Total US Unfunded Liabilities $123,291,781,951,493.05
Social Security Unfunded Liability $15,112,437,524,316.82
Medicare Unfunded Liability $79,032,045,007,051.80
Prescription Drug Unfunded Liability $19,944,988,236,229.60
National Healthcare Unfunded Liability $9,202,311,183,894.82
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Person $391,769.09
Total US Unfunded Liabilities Per Household $1,014,681.95


The link shows dynamically updating of all of the above in real time, and on its FAQ page says
"As of the end of the day on 09/27/2012 the United States National Debt stood at exactly $16,015,131,024,562.54
The National Debt is increasing this fiscal year at about $3,307,130,208.00 [that's $3 billion] per day or $38,276.97 per second."

And also...
"6. Can't we just tax the rich more and fix everything? At the end of 2010, the total worth of all American billionaires was $1.3 Trillion. That is not income, but all income and all property.
Seizing all their income and all their property would not even close the gap for one year.
And you can only do it once."


Funny how candidate Obama in 2008 called GW Bush "unpatriotic" because of what was then a $9 trillion debt
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q

This statement from Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner to Paul Ryan is interesting too
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/02/16/geithner_to_ryan_on_debt_we_dont_have_a_definitive_solution_to_our_long-term_problem.html
"Geithner: ... We're not coming before you to say we have a definitive solution to our long-term problem. What we do know is we don't like yours."

Score: -4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Of course the main drivers of our debt have and continues to be the Bush tax cuts and two unfunded wars, funny how the debt just became an issue when Obama was elected. http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3490

replied to whatever
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"funny how the debt just became an issue when Obama was elected."

BRL, obviously it was also an issue before Obama was elected whether or not you remember it that way.

See that Youtube link in my previous comment where O tells a crowd in summer 2008 that Bush is literally "unpatriotic" because of the then $9 trillion debt (which in O's term has almost doubled to over $16T). If that isn't O "making it an issue" as part of his regular campaign speeches, ads, etc, I don't know what would be.

So clearly prominent D's including O himself were very loudly making "an issue" of it back then before he was elected. Not so much since.

On the R side, there was Ron Paul's 2008 campaign heavily critical of Bush and his fellow Rs (and Ds of course) regarding debt & spending. He received over 1 million votes in R primaries that year (5% of total votes), all well before Obama was elected that November.
While 5% is a small portion, still over 1 million votes from R's isn't nothing at all.

But yes, of course there also were back then, and still are now, many Rs who favor big growing govt without serious reforms. And many Ds. No question. That doesn't diminish the issue at all.

BRL>"main drivers of our debt have and continues to be the Bush tax cuts and two unfunded wars"

Even with wars, bailouts, & everything in your cbpp link's chart, at least Ryan has put together a detailed serious plan (even Obama admits Ryan's plan is serious) to deal with it. Not any similarly serious plan from Obama all these years - that clip in my other link of his Sec Geithner directly admits that.

In fact, there's a lot of legitimate criticism that Ryan's plan doesn't have enough deep reforms, but by comparison to nothing

About chart at your cbpp link showing "Bush-era tax cuts" -
First, those rates expired in 2010 while Pelosi-Reid still controlled both houses of Congress and they and their majorities chose to extend them (with Obama signing the extension). So a more accurate label would be something like "Bush-Obama-Pelosi era tax rates".
Second, that big dark orange part of the graph includes the reductions for middle- and lower-income taxpayers which are a substantial portions of revenue, and which Obama has said all along that he favors continuing. So, no he isn't excused even from much of even that portion of the graph. His big troop surge in 2009 Afghanistan was also "unfunded", btw.
So those excuses for not proposing how to address the problem after 4 years don't have merit. He should've already offered a detailed serious plan for the problem about which he was so critical 4 years ago when it was around half the size.
Finger pointing isn't a good substitute at this point.

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mr. Obama's policies are dead on for creating fewer jobs, and more dependency. Things for him, seem to be going according to plan.

Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Blah blah blah.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Do you send your kids to Patriot Camp?

replied to benfranklin
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why would you ask a question about my children? That's a bit creepy.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You should look into a Patriot Camp. It sounds like the type of place you'd be interested in sending your children - if you had any, as my comment was ambiguous - so they can be brainwashed.

"Welcome to Camp Idontwantobama!
Crafts, tug-of-war, and pre-snack antiabortion lessons. Inside a Glenn Beck—inspired summer camp

Read More http://www.gq.com/magazine/toc/201210/index_201210#ixzz283drzEhG
"

replied to LouisTully
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The link takes me to the cover, searching GQ (interesting choice on your part) for patriot camp didn't find much.

You're a good example of how nasty those on the left have become. Have a nice day.

replied to LouisTully
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Pot and Kettle, right? The link is disabled for some reason. I think the Glenn Beck inspired summer camp gives the gist. Don't pretend to be so blind to think nastiness is weighted in a certain direction.

Here's a snippet for you:

"...an instructor asked, 'How do you get rid of a president who's doing a BAD job?' Here Faye giggles and half covers her mouth like she's about to share the perfect kids-say-the-darnedest-things punch line. 'A couple of them shouted out, 'ASSASSINATION!'"

But, yeah, the left sure is nasty.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm speaking of you specifically, about being nasty.

You're making broad generalizations about abortion/Glen Beck, and now some crude joke that I wouldn't repeat. What do any of these things have to do with me? Your concept of conservative beliefs appears to be what gets served up by the Daily Show or GQ.

I'd just ask for some reflection on your part about what you seem to be willing to accept as truth. I suspect you're smarter than that.

replied to LouisTully
Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

President Obama has and continues to advocate for average Americans, his policies reflect the basic values that were once taken for granted by both Democrats and Republicans. The idea that he is anything more than a centrist is just naive and is more a reflection of your party's move to the extreme right. I can remember when Republicans were reasonable, when they actually governed by cooperation and compromise. The Republican Party is no longer viewed as a credible alternative, they refuse to face facts and blindly cling to the same tired agenda.

replied to benfranklin
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment