Real Estate August 2, 2012 12:15 AM

St. Luke's Project to Serve Single Moms and Families

St. Luke’s Project to Serve Single Moms and Families
St. Luke's Mission of Mercy has received Buffalo Planning Board approval to construct the Gospa Village project, a complex serving single moms and their children.  Up to eighteen single-family homes will be constructed on vacant lots on the block bound by Oberlin Avenue, Walden Avenue, Ruhland Avenue and Sycamore Street across from the St. Luke's campus.  A shared educational and gathering space for residents is planned for Sycamore Street.  The Buffalo Common Council has approved the sale of 18 City-owned properties needed for the project.  Scheid Architectural is designing the complex.

gospa2.pnggospa4.jpg
Run by missionaries from St. Luke's, the project will provide a supervised living environment for single moms and their children.  While there, residents will learn such things as parenting skills, budgeting, cooking and sewing; and they can earn GED and college degrees while their children are cared for.  The goal of Gospa Village is to protect and help the women while they are learning to get back on their feet and care for their families.

St. Luke's Mission of Mercy is totally run by volunteers and has been serving Buffalo's poor, hungry, homeless, and sick for over 15 years.  Gospa Village will be funded through private donations and corporate sponsorships.

gospa1.png
gospa5.jpg
Images Courtesy of Scheid Architectural

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

Stop rewarding single mothrs

Living off others and living off the taxpyer is not an option
Husbands and fathers are not an option
Women can't have it all or do it alone

There are women having sex and having kids just for the benefits they qualify

Put the kids in an orphanage and let the mothers visit but make them be responsible rather than rewarded

Score: -20 ( 58 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or their husbands beat them or walked out on them for another woman.

Do you know any of these women? If not you should not be so judgmental Even if they are the lazy leaches you make them out to be do you propose dumping on their children in retribution or should we perhaps try to break the cycle by giving a helping hand and perhaps some good influences?

THis is a good example of what the Catholic Church could be doing in teh city instead of fleeing.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 19 ( 35 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with you Steel. To be fair though, the Catholic church does do a lot for the city even still. For example, it provides clinics in underserved areas of the city where the county has been pulling back. Catholic Charities is also involved in resettling a lot of the immigrants who are repopulating the west side.

replied to STEEL
Score: 7 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Steel, my disagreement is not personal

However, while you and others are defending the mothers by blaming the father. When was the last time you saw federal, state and local benefits and laws written that favor the husband / father. Never. Husbands and fathers are optional which is the source of the problem. It takes 2 incomes to escape poverty and a 1 income single mother is guarrantee to a life of poverty.

Obviously while beating down the lack of the husband/fathers virtues and singing the praises of the wife/mother...and dismissing the orphanages...who has not been to a retail store or welfare line etc and scene these kids abused physically, mentally, emotionally by single mothers who cant handle being a parent. For liberals its politically incorrect to criticize the mother by saying they cant handle it and the kids should be taken away...but perfectly ok...to bash the husband/father

There is anti-male bias in our society and personally I for one will call it out. the only reason single mothers exist is because the state finances it. Cut off those social benefits and all this liberal politically correct nonsense would stop...and the kids would be better off in an orphanage than with an incompetent overwhelmed irresponsible mother.

PS: of all the single mothers...many dont get this free housing and job skills...its mostly those that know how to rig the system to work for them that get it.

replied to STEEL
Score: -6 ( 28 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

LOL at there being an "anti-male bias" in this society. Clearly you need to walk a few days in a woman's proverbial shoes.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's right! Punish these women for violating your personal moral standards! Let's block this organization, which works intimately in this community and knows its residents, from filling what it sees as a need because it might give these women the wrong idea and just encourage them.
I don't suppose you consider yourself to be a Christian, do you? Based off of your previous posts it would seem as though you adhere to some tenets of that faith. It certainly doesn't look like it here.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 3 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm going to guess your so angry after having to spend all day yesterday in line at a chik-fil-a under the searing heat of the sun.. All to protect "'merican values."

While your on your tear with your mid-20th century mindset, why not go after interracial marriage or the civil rights movement as well.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 11 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

it's amazing how little of that article you must have read.

You: "living off the taxpayer is not an option"
Article: "Gospa Village will be funded through private donations and corporate sponsorships"

You: "make them [mothers] be responsible rather than rewarded"
Article: "residents will learn such things as parenting skills, budgeting, cooking and sewing; and they can earn GED and college degrees"

There are likely going to be a lot of requirements to live here. This isn't a BMHA, they don't have to accept anyone and everyone. They will likely force the mothers to take part in these self betterment classes at least as partial payment for living there. This is a supervised environment...

replied to paulsobo
Score: 18 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They will be in a supervised environment and will learn their GED and have responsibilities.

And I know alot of women who cant wait to have a baby because the federal, state and local welfare, grants, food stamps, housing, tuition is so much more than they would get than if they didnt have kids.

Meanwhile these women yell and hit and belittle their kids with all sorts of abuse. You can see it while their cashing in their food stamps and the local stores.

As far as it being a minority opinion, hey when times were good people looked the other way...pay my taxes and mind my own business...but with the debt and the high unemployment...people are starting to say no to state sponsored immigration and state sponsored feminism and state sponsored irresponsible behavior and civil service unions that bypass the taxpayer with their inside deals.

Civil Rights doesnt need support from social programs. Its a judicial matter. The taxpayer neednt be involved.

Inter-racial marriage and gay marriage is a civil matter and the taxpayer neednt be involved.

unwed, single mothers...thats a corruption racket that needs to end just like anti-male feminism.

Its all disgusting

replied to sbrof
Score: -10 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I know alot of women who cant wait to have a baby because the federal, state and local welfare, grants, food stamps, housing, tuition is so much more than they would get than if they didnt have kids."

Bullshit.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ezekiel 18:20 (new international version)

"the soul who sins is the one who will die. the son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. the righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him."

deuteronomy 24:16 (new international version)
"fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children put to death for their fathers; each is to die for his own sin.


replied to paulsobo
Score: 0 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

wow you should probably reconsider other factors that cause these mothers to be single. Your accusation that they just have kids to get the benefits might be true of a very small group of the single mother population. Why are you punishing the kids by putting them in an orphanage? This is a great project and plus it is funded privately you should have no qualms about this.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You represent that shrinking vocal minority who try to impose personal values on others.

Free yourself from the worry and the hate.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting that the Bishop got an award from the city the other day, even though his office closed and abandoned St Lukes.

Now that the parish is free from Diocesan control, they've not only reopened the church and serve the community without any funds from the city or diocese... their volunteers are rebuilding the neighborhood!

Great example of what people can do when they're not tied down by bureaucratic apathy and red tape.

Score: 11 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow, these houses remind me of many of those in the Cottage District on the west side. Very front-garden friendly!

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

the street names are spelled oberlin and ruhland, fyi...

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This sort of small scale low income housing is exactly what the city needs. The smaller scale makes everything more manageable. With so much room available in the city there is no reason for dense low income housing.

Jordan Levy just started a tech incubator. There is no reason why an incubator program can't work for these folks. If they are willing to invest in themselves with GED, College, etc. I don't see any reason why the community shouldn't invest in them.

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

WIth all the abondonded buildings why build more ? Cant they use some existing buildings?

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree 100%. While the mission of this group is excellent, I just can't imagine why we allow the historic stock on the East Side to continue to die by neglect, forcing taxpayers to pay for demolition and, ultimately, new construction.

This wasteful attitude must change.

replied to chetroia
Score: 4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In general, I would agree. Reuse is far better than demolish/rebuild.

But look at the existing photo... there is nothing to demolish! Creating infill on vacant land will create a sense of community where an entire block only has three homes separated by a vast stretch of open wasteland. A better sense of community will hopefully entice existing homeowners to maintain their property and refurbish rather than abandon to the wrecker ball.

Plus, as someone else pointed out, St Lukes has already refurbished several homes in the area. Turning this neighborhood into a place where residents take pride in their surroundings may very well be the incentive that neighbors need to turn around from a downward slide to a resurgence (or at least stability)

If they were planning to raze the existing homes and replace them with something completely out of character, I'd be worried. But this is a respectable effort to harmonize with what remains of the surroundings.

replied to chetroia
Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This looks to be a great project. This is what the religious groups should be doing, helping the poor and St. Luke's is going even farther. What an awesome idea and project!

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think these look pretty nice. I like that these are brick, and I like that they didn't plunk an enormous parking lot in the middle of the block like many low-income apartment projects.

But I don't understand why the doors are on the side of the buildings, instead of either facing the street (preferable), or if the goal is for an enclosed "campus", at least facing into the shared courtyard area. It makes them seem less like houses and more like trailers.

The aerial rendering makes it look like a proper city block (except with a shared backyard park, which is a nice feature, really), but then you realize that the "front" of the houses are actually the sides. Kind of bizarre.

Still, it seems like a good project, and I like that it is meant to help people get back on their feet, rather than just provide low-income housing for the people who are more or less expected to stay poor forever.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think the idea of a shared courtyard as opposed to backyards is an excellent idea. It builds a sense of community, and is safer. It appears that the doors are on the side because they are behind a secure gate, and are accessible from either the front or back. It would be nearly impossible to have the density this creates by using abandoned housing. It's highly unlikely you would find enough clustered together like this to create the same concept, and they are directly across the street from the parish. Not only that, it is probably cheaper to build new than to rehab old. They can also build these to be very energy efficient, without basements and generally much less costly to maintain. I think this is an excellent way to reclaim a neighborhood, and I would like to see more of this done around the city, but not limiting it to non-profit organizations, but for the general public. It's especially enticing if the ground maintenance is taken care of an association.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

St. Luke's has bought and rehabilitated over a dozen neighboring houses, mostly on Miller Street and Sycamore Avenue. These houses are used by missionaries, staff and those being served by the Mission's various programs. This is the first new construction that St. Luke's has engaged in since their inception 18 years ago.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The main entries of the houses should face their respective streets. By turning their back to the neighborhood, public safety becomes further reduced and 'sense of community' doesn't leave the gates of the Village.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

They really can't do that, given the purpose of the housing as a supervised living environment. In this regard, it's like Wilson Commencement in my hometown. Single mothers with children who have been in unsettled circumstances are especially vulnerable to people trying to track them down and bring grief and unneeded drama into their lives. With a project like this, St. Luke's is trying to create a safe, predictable, supervised environment so that these young families can have some stability.

Unfortunately for folks in that situation, individual doors facing and approachable directly from the street would invite trouble -- so aren't really compatible with this project. But given that constraint, I'd say that the designs and site plan are very good.

replied to Publius
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


I'd like to see the community support families, reward families who have stuck it out and with 2 jobs and kids in school on a consistent basis, give them a break and help them out with a nice home! Lets not promote single family living with the Babies Papa not living there but just visiting for 10 years, all 5 different Papas!

Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment