City August 31, 2012 11:39 AM

Not Coming To A Theater Near You

Not Coming To A Theater Near You
By Jordan M. Smith:

It's nearing film festival season for the region (the Toronto International Film Fest kicks off on September 6th with the Buffalo International Film Fest to follow shortly after on September 14th) and as I recall the last year of film viewing in Buffalo, I can't help but feel like Nickel City cinephiles are getting shafted.  

If you live near downtown Buffalo, not only is your selection of theaters limited to the Market Arcade (located at 639 Main) or Regal Elmwood (located at 2001 Elmwood), both of which almost solely provide access to mainstream popcorn-munching fare, or the Dipson North Park theater (located 1428 Hertel), which is the only truly city bound theater playing indie and foreign features, but with only a single film playing each week, those looking for more adventurous cinema experiences are apt to travel up to the Dipson Amherst (3 screens at 3500 Main), all the way up to the Dipson Eastern Hills Mall (3 screens at 4545 Transit in Williamsville) or to the often forgotten about Screening Room (1 screen at 3131 Sheridan in Amherst) for retro screenings like their continuous Hitchcock series.  

With only 7 screens devoted to non-Hollywood produced films within about a 50-mile radius, choices for most Buffalo film buffs are slim pickings.  Not to mention the almost complete lack of theatrical documentaries playing in the area (with a few rare exceptions like Wim Wender's Pina or the upcoming Sundance favorite Searching For Sugarman.  It's a honestly a bit bleak.  Plus, as wonderful as it would be to see the new Woody Allen or Werner Herzog film here in Buffalo, it would certainly not be as comfortable as seeing the new comic book extravaganza at the Walden Galleria Regal theaters with their ultra comfortable, semi-reclining stadium seating.  Would it really be asking too much for some upholstering upgrades in some of the smaller, more accessible Buffalo based theaters?  I think not.
And what's more, when looking at the film release schedule, if on them at all, Buffalo is continuously near the bottom of calendar lists for non-Hollywood releases.  If you look back at the last few months in which some of the biggest indie titles of the year saw their release, there was almost always a month between most major cities and Buffalo's release dates.  Some examples include Wes Anderson's Moonrise Kingdom (photo) which played to rave reviews at this year's Cannes Film Fest (Released Nationally May 25, in Buffalo on June 22), Benh Zeitlin's debut Sundance highlight Beasts of the Southern Wild (Released Nationally June 27, in Buffalo on July 20), and even this month's funny, but big-hearted Celeste and Jesse Forever starring Rashida Jones and Andy Samberg (Released Nationally August 3, but finally arriving in Buffalonian theaters today).  

Sure, it takes many indie releases some time to get some steam behind them before moving on to bigger and better (and more lucrative) cities, but these few examples are film fest approved with studio-backed releases.  So, why are we constantly left waiting for films to finally make their way here after seeing weeks of press from exterior sources, if they even make their way here?  Sadly, there has been so many great releases this year that never even made it to Buffalo.  Are we really lacking the market, or are our current cinema providers just lacking the gall or merely the capacity to cater to our cinematic cravings?  I honestly don't know the answer, but I'd personally prefer not to drive to Toronto every time something interesting fails to make its way here.

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

I'm not Mr. Buffalo Booster or anything, but I could not disagree with this more - Buffalo is an amazing city for cinephiles.

If you count the Market Arcade, which you should, that makes 14 Dipson-owned screens in the area showing independent movies, plus the Screening Room, plus the film events they do at the Palace Theater and the Riviera. Not to mention Movieland, which isn't strictly an indie, but still shows a ton of indies - right now they're playing the new Soderbergh and the new Woody Allen. Plus things like the Buffalo Film Seminars, and the Midnight Beacon series, plus screening events at Squeaky Wheel, Sugar City, the Burchfield and Albright Knox, Shea's, the Historical Society... It's a complete embarassment of riches in Buffalo which puts a lot of cities 4 times its size to shame. (When I lived in D.C. 5 years ago there were exactly 8 screens in the metro area showing art films. Right now in Charlotte NC there are only 7 screens -- both of those have populations way, way larger than Buffalo.) Not to mention one of the few actual functioning drive-ins remaining in America, which even started doing repertory showings this summer.

And almost all of these are within a 20-25 minute drive of each other. When you say that there's only 7 indie screens "within about a 50-mile radius", you're exagerrating a fair bit -- 50 miles is 3/4 the way to Rochester. Even if you went all the way from the Market Arcade downtown to the Transit Drive-In in Lockport, that's at most a little over 20 miles. You could see a 4:00 show at one and a 7:00 show at the other and not even have to rush.

To say that Buffalo is getting the shaft because we didn't get Moonrise Kingdom or Beasts of the Southern Wild until 3 weeks after they opened in NYC & LA, or because the seats don't recline like they do in corporate mega-multiplexes, is really missing the forest for the trees and not appreciating how much better movie fans in Buffalo have it compared to a TON of other cities -- you could go see a different new indie or rarely-seen classic every single night of the week here and still not catch everything. It's super rare that I have enough free time to see every movie that I wanna see on the big screen in Buffalo each week -- it's really, really far from bleak.

Score: 9 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

When I was an undergrad at UB back in the early 80s, we had a filmfest every day of the week. Bill Hooley was the programmer, and every night was a different film. Moreover, there was a definate theme each semester, and within each semester, a different twist each weekday. You might have a certain director featured on Mondays, Czech films on Tuesdays, film noir on Wednesdays, the Evolving Portrayal of Blacks in Film on Thursdays, and more popular fare for the weekends.

You could easily become a master of film analysis and history just be reading the blurbs and program guide and attending the films.

I don't think that exists anymore, but I sure wish we had something like that for all the city to partake, but such a program doesn't exist anywhere in American that I am aware of. I guess the economics are just too difficult. The AFI in Silver Spring comes closest, and they are struggling.

But I agree -- Buffalo may not be the cinephile's paradise, but it has nothing to be ashamed of either.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And are there movies that play Toronto & NYC that don't make it to Buffalo? Of course there are, but the vast majority of those aren't going to be found playing ANYWHERE else aside from Toronto, NYC, and LA. Saying Buffalo's filmgoing scene isn't as good as Toronto's is like saying our canyon scene isn't as good as Arizona's, or our cracked-bell scene isn't as good as Philadelphia's. Like, obviously it's not, but we're still doing waaaay better than your average American city.

Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Sure, the lag between release in larger cities and ours can be annoying, but we don't have the market I'm guessing. Would be nice if the Regal chain would devote at least one screen to independent film, but at least we have Dipson. Yes, their seats are old and uncomfy, but they aren't making the money to afford an upgrade I'm guessing. At least their popcorn kicks ass! My only problem with Dipson is that they often play great stuff at Eastern Hills that would probably to better at Market Arcade or North Park. They should move them around more (if that's allowed). North Park should do two week runs instead of two month runs as well..

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Jordan, it took me a while to weigh in, but I agree with you completely -- and it's a sad state of affairs, especially given Buffalo's much more glorious past history with the movie business. In addition to being the home to what is believed to be the first purpose-built movie theater in America (in basement of Ellicott Square building), Buffalo was also a center for film provisioning. The recent article about Dinosaur BBQ's Buffalo location indicated that the building used to be a film exchange -- where films were shipped in from the studios and then distributed to theaters in cities within a radius of Buffalo. And that wasn't the only facility -- on Franklin and Pearl there were once IIRC a couple dozen such facilities in close proximity. Many of those buildings are still there, used for other purposes.

When I lived in Rochester, I lived just off East Ave. between the George Eastman House, which shows classic film 6 nights a week in a beautiful purpose-built neoclassical theater on the grounds, and the Little Theater, which has 6 screens and shows mostly indy/art house films but also the smaller-distribution documentaries you mention. Rochester doesn't have a first-run theater within city limits, but I could grab the East Ave bus out to Pittsford to a medium-sized plaza multiplex that shows most first-run films but also many indy/art house pictures as well. In other words, as a film buff I was pretty much covered, and I took full advantage of it to learn a lot about film.

In Buffalo, it's a bigger challenge. There's the Market Arcade, North Park, and Amherst, yes. But many indy/art house pictures and smaller-distribution documentaries that do make it here are in many cases only shown at the Dipson theater at Eastern Hills Mall. Getting there and back by transit, especially in the evenings when schedules thin out, is a logistical nightmare. Places like the Screening Room, out in the 'burbs, present similar challenges.

All these factors hinder Buffalo's film culture, which otherwise has great potential. If Buffalo developed its film culture and market, more of these smaller-distribution pictures would be shown here, and we'd get them sooner.

What would it take to turn things around--? Having more downtown first-run screens would help, especially in the theater district to add to the critical mass there. Screens downtown are especially accessible to college students from the various campuses along the MetroRail spine. Finding a public/private model to operate more neighborhood theaters would also help (a challenge, I know). Places like the Screening Room could take over rehabbed historic theaters in the city, instead of operating in the 'burbs. One of the screens in the Market Arcade (or at a rehabbed neighborhood theater somewhere in the city) could install projectors capable of handling archival film, and perhaps set up a partnership with the George Eastman House in Rochester, so that classic film could be shown nightly, year round. Also, it would be kinda fun to install a screen on the side of one of the grain elevators and have a real drive-in (and bike-in) theater in the city.

All of that would take resources, but even more important vision, leadership, and organization. Historic preservation folks could be a valuable partner, as having uses for old theaters and grain elevators helps keep them standing. It would also require an economic case: if more films are shown in the city, people will spend other money in the city before and after the films. And other spinoff effects.

Could any or all of that happen--? Vision, then leadership, then organization, then resources.

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You're not the first to think about movies on the Grain Elevators but to show proper films you need a flat reflective screen. You would either need to paint Lake and Rail and get permission to use it since it was just sold and is used for grain storage, this would be terrific to watch movies from boats, kayaks and from the Mutual park.

Or you could mount some kind of large screen on a cylinder silo, like the Connecting terminal (across from Canalside)

Either way you would need a serious industrial film projector and secure location, with enough money this wouldn't be a problem but it's not as easy as just calling Indigo. I talked to Ed Summer from the Buffalo Film Festival and he said he had some contacts that could get one once all the hurdles are overcome.

Find a way to get the money to paint the lake and rail or build a screen on Connecting Terminal. I suggest someone with proposal writing skills asks ECHDC for money to do this next time they ask for programing.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is it honestly a "logistical nightmare" to get to the Screening Room?

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes.

To reiterate, getting to a suburban location & back by transit in the evenings or on weekends when schedules thin out, is a logistical nightmare. And even if you can get there, you're a slave to the transit schedule. I've been to films in suburban locations where I had the choice between arriving an hour and a half early, or else 10 minutes into the film. Similarly, between leaving 10 minutes before the end of the film or waiting around an hour and a half before catching the next bus -- often, in the case of evening showings, after the theater or mall has closed so waiting outside with perhaps no shelter from the elements.

None of that sounds like much fun, right--? But seeing a film should be an enjoyable, relaxing part of an evening's entertainment or weekend matinee. So we need to have our theaters in the city, where most of the transit service is, and where there are walkable neighborhoods to do some shopping, grab a bite to eat, or run an errand before or after the show. The side benefit is that the show generates more economic spinoff in the neighborhood of the theater.

I realize that suburban multiplexes are always going to be around, and I'm not suggesting they shouldn't be. But if a certain film or certain type of film is only going to be shown on one particular screen in an entire county, then that screen ought to be in the city. Where everyone can get to it, and everyone can enjoy it.

replied to Pat K
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I dunno - it sounds a little like you're saying that people in the suburbs don't deserve a rep house theater, which I'm not sure I understand. When I was a kid growing up way out in the suburbs, the Screening Room and Eastern Hills theaters were cinematic lifelines near & dear to my heart, and where I got a lot of my film education & inspiration. Personally I think it's a major plus for the local filmgoing scene, not a downside, that kids out in the cultural desert of the Northtown suburbs have options to see Malick or Hitchcock movies on the big screen just as easily as city residents do.

All I'm saying is that it's important to appreciate that there are literally millions of people living in cities much larger than Buffalo -- cities like Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Charlotte, or DC, or dozens more all around the country -- that would kill to have as many arthouse/indie and repertory filmgoing options as we do in Buffalo on literally any given night of any week. It's true that there may be 2 additional movie theaters outside the city limits that are not easy to get to by bus, and it's true that you might not get to see Bela Tarr movies in their first run the week they come out like in NYC or Toronto, but I just think it's shortsighted to go so far as to say that Buffalo is a "dire" or "bleak" filmgoing town because of that or other nitpicks. I'm the last person to say that Buffalo as a city has everything figured out, but when it comes to moviegoing there's just no getting around the fact that Buffalo is a really rich town for cinema with a ton of options that are lacking in cities 2, 3, even 10 times its size.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment