City August 23, 2012 2:58 PM

DEC Air Quality Monitoring at the Peace Bridge to Begin. Too little, too late?

DEC Air Quality Monitoring at the Peace Bridge to Begin. Too little, too late?

The Department of Environmental Conservation announced today that air quality testing should begin early next month in the Peace Bridge neighborhood. The Buffalo News has the story here. The DEC will be monitoring upwind and downwind of the bridge in two, six month phases. The first monitoring phase will be before the planned expansion and the second phase will occur six months after the expansion has been completed.

Once all the data has been collected the DEC will compare notes and see if there has been a significant, negative environmental impact with the expansion and the additional trucks sure to follow. While nearby residents have been trying to get the air quality monitored for quite some time, the DEC is only acting now and it seems like the effort is coming up short.

Peace Bridge neighborhood resident, Kathleen Meeca believes the effort is, "too little, too late" and I definitely have to agree with her. It has been documented that cases of asthma in the neighborhood are significantly higher than other areas of the city as a result of the truck traffic and idling. While it's good that the DEC will be finally monitoring the effects, what happens after the expansion is built and it turns out the air quality is even worse?

Does anyone actually think that if that turns out to be the case the newly built expansion will be bulldozed to reduce the negative impact? The following letter comes from Dr. Jamson Lwebuga-Mukasa, President and CEO of Respiratory and Environmental Exposure Consultants. Dr. Mukasa has performed several of his own tests in the Peace Bridge neighborhood in recent years. His research was also the basis for a thesis project I completed in my final year in UB's Environmental Design program.

"After a transient decrease in traffic congestion at the bridge and US Customs, truck traffic volume may actually increase as truckers take advantage of decreased congestion at the bridge. Increased truck volume will trigger in a new round of congestion and parking lot enlargement paid for by the taxpayers. The proposed plan does not address pollution due to diesel trucks accelerating out of the plaza and the idling of the trucks at the duty-free shop at the parking lot. Increased truck volume will increase pollution at these sites, which are major causes of pollution.

The congestion and increased pollution will require more land expansion deep into the community. So will the illnesses associated with particulate exposure. This will results in further widening of the parking lot and associated pollution due to further additional traffic. Buildings number at the parking lot will need to be increased to service the increased parking lot customers. Multi-story buildings at the parking lot may be erected on the parking lot. Spaces between multi-story buildings form channels with increased wind flow, which results into pollutants penetrating deep into the community. Multi-story buildings ruin the quality of life for those living in the community by obstructing the lake and river view and rendering Front Park unusable because of increased pollution.

I now wish to talk about children's health. Sick children do learn as well. If a child has been up all night, or in the emergency room and/or hospital, because of asthma, sinusitis, ear ache, cough or nasal congestion he/she and the parents will not be able to attend school or go to work. This contributes to already poor school attendance and school achievement. Parents too leave work in order to take care of the children. This contributes to a permanent underclass of community residents that will last 50 to 100 years.

In the meantime, an organization will make a lot of profit from tolls and shops at the parking lot. The city will continue to provide services for the sewer system and connecting roads. The number of jobs will be low paying and likely episodic. Workers at the tollbooths are exposed to truck pollution and develop chronic illnesses that will increase as traffic increases. Because pollutants are distributed to other organs in the body, most people do not associate their illnesses with traffic pollution. For example, heart attacks, stroke, certain cancers and other inflammatory diseases. Such illnesses are paid for by taxpayers. The parking lot owners keep the profits.

The construction of transit traffic parking lot in a densely populated urban community is ill-conceived, horribly unjust and progress in reverse, especially when other cities are diverting pass-through traffic from downtown. Proper environmental assessment has not been performed because of unachievable rushed timelines. Yet residents are threatened with properties seizure when they request that justice be done. The threats create uncertainty and a further deterioration of a stable diverse, historic community. The rushed air monitoring schedule does not take into account seasonal variations likely to invalidate the assessment. It appears that studies are being done to cherry peak results that support the parking lot expansion into the community."

I had an opportunity to talk to Kathleen Mecca further so she could elaborate on her opinion of the expansion. "The DEC ploy is to detract from the scientific data collected by Mukasa-Spengler and to avoid conducting an environmental impact study." said Mecca, "DEC monitoring does not replace that process and cannot be used to avoid requirements under environmental law. Air monitoring is a part of the EIS not a substitute. Why is the DEC so willing to violate NEPA?"

Mecca went on to explain that, "Irrefutable data on air toxins at the peace bridge already exists that is peer reviewed by top scientists. The location of DEC monitors is arbitrary: According to Mukasa-Spengler, the hottest spot for fine particulates and toxins was at the Episcopal Church Home not Busti and Vermont. Reason; The bridge and the ingress and egress of truck diesel emission. The ECH is where the PBA intends to expand it's complex either with a Duty Free or some other truck staging function - we don't know because they won't tell us."

The whole situation continues to result in more unanswered questions than anything else. "Why has the scientific evidence been ignored by Higgins, Ryan, Kennedy, Mayor Brown, David Rivera, Sam Hoyt, Gov. Cuomo, the PBA and now the DEC?" asked Mecca, "Who are these agency bureaucrats that hijack federal policy & laws and why are they able to get away with it?"

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

LOL. They did this like 15 years ago there. This whole bridge thing is a frigging joke.

Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A negative report would also support a unified bridge authority which could reroute truck traffic to under-used bridges

Cleaner air and a unified bridge authority

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

2 simple questions -

Why does anybody think the NF bridge authority whose members are appointed by Cuomo and the Ontario govt would decide anything significantly differently than the PBA whose members are also appointed by Cuomo and the Ontario govt?

How would you force truck traffic to use Lewiston instead of using the PB, and even if you somehow could, won't most of that then just massively increase truck traffic congestion on the 190 north of the PB (in other words, moving fumes closer to Black Rock)?

I suppose that's 3 questions.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wishful and unrealistic thinking here, but could it be possible to remove I-190, and have the traffic from I-90 North move into I-290 in Tonawanda? That eventually hooks into the NYS Thruway and also will take them down into the Southtowns anyway. Oh yeah, and it would remove that blighty highway from Riverside/Black Rock and the West Side. Use the Peace Bridge for personal traffic, not trucks. The fact of the matter is there isn't much in Buffalo to attract truckers. You're better off sticking to the tourists.

replied to whatever
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wish we could bury it, the link to Buffalo from Niagara Falls is pretty useful but it's located horribly because it used the ROW from the Erie Canal. We're not Boston so that won't happen.

replied to BuffaloEmigrant
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

emigrant - at least you're willing to suggest what you favor instead of just saying what you're against.

But I agree that's wishful and unrealistic (for many reasons, including Canada wanting a Fort Erie truck bridge), and also it would have some unintended bad consequences here too...
If you removed 190 from Buffalo, tis traffic (even portion having nothing to do with Peace Bridge) would still exist. You can wish it disappears or takes longer routes around Buffalo, but for various reasons wouldn't much of it go still through Black Rock, only via Niagara St (and using River Road north of there and the other part of Niagara through the rest of Buffalo to go to/from .. Route 5, or the 33, or downtown, … etc)?
The city portion of 190 is used a lot by Buffalo residents/businesses, so traffic from those will still exist, for example. Also, some trucks heading to or from Canada-Lewiston would drive through the city instead of the 290-90 which you'd hope for. It would depend on their end points, and also on how much slower the 90/290 would become due to extra trucks which could no longer use the PB and do decide to use the alternative you suggest with Lewiston. The 90 and 290 already get very congested (by WNY standards) at some times as it is.

There could be a few good consequences of having a lot more cars and trucks using Niagara or other north-south alternatives in the city if the 190 was removed and trucks banned on the PB, along with some bad effects like inefficiencies for businesses here ...
but even setting aside everything else - including massive cost of removal - if the big issue is exhaust fumes reaching residential, how would that improve to have such a huge jump in cars & trucks clogging up regular city streets?

replied to BuffaloEmigrant
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This issue makes me sick to my stomach.

I want to buy a house and invest my time, money and energy in the west side but by no means will I want to harm myself and my future family. Who would want to expose their children to increased Asthma and/or cancer rates? No one.

And I am definitely not alone in the want to live on the West Side either as many friends and families have begun investing and moving into the area. Do we not want families to spend money, attend our city schools and pay taxes? Well we won't have it if people are afraid to live there.

This is an agenda item fueled by money and greed. None of our politicians have the courage to stand up and defend the citizens who voted them in, which is a real shame.

Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"I want to buy a house and invest my time, money and energy in the west side but by no means will I want to harm myself and my future family. Who would want to expose their children to increased Asthma and/or cancer rates? No one."

Well apparently millions of Buffalonians did from about the late 1800's until 1990. As the air quality in Buffalo, especially around Lackawanna and the old Bethlehem site was absolutely terrible. You often hear stories of people thinking that City Hall was black, or that if you lived in Lackawanna and traveled somewhere else people always knew you were from Lackawanna just by the way you clothes smelled. So compare now to back then and your really just crying into a lake.

replied to bernicebuffalove
Score: -5 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yeah, because people totally knew about lung cancer and the carcinogens from the factories back in the 1800s. Advances in science and medicine have (not surprisingly) made people more cautious about environmental factors, and I have to agree.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How about we see how fast a member of the DEC can run today, shoot him in the foot, and see how fast he can run six months after surgery? This is the stupidest idea yet; up there with Bass Pro.

Also, people used to think nothing of smoking back in the day, in fact thought it was good for you. Science and ideas change with time and information. Your argument that Buffalo grew during heightened pollution times isn't relevant.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

.........actually that wasn't the point I was trying to make :-)

replied to 14213
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Mike Puma or anyone -

Hypothetically, if you became somehow convinced that it's totally impractical politically on both sides of the border to ban (or even substantially reduce from current amounts) commercial trucking via Fort Erie and the PB - then would you favor or oppose the plaza expansion and why?

Also, how would you feel about greatly increased truck traffic through the 190 between Porter up through Black Rock - if somehow lightning struck and you were able to get the Cuomo admin, Obama admin, the Ontario and Canadian govts to all agree to ban traffic on the PB in favor of Lewiston (which won't happen, but if it did)? Most trucks to or from points south of Buffalo would still pass through here wouldn't they - using a fairly narrow 190 highway through Black Rock?

Just curious.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree that the air pollution on the West Side puts a damper on what should be, could be a thriving waterfront neighborhood. And I am all for trying to put a check on the forces that favor more trucks at any cost. But it seems to me that the people moving this whole thing forward are high-up and powerful and probably not able to be stopped outright. I am thinking mitigation strategies. I know it's lipstick on a pig, but an aggressive tree planting program (an odd phrase, to be sure) could do some good toward cleaner air and better quality of life. Perhaps a botanist out there could suggest trees and plants that are best for that purpose. There is plenty of room in the West Side for more trees. I'd be happy to dig holes and hold a watering can. Curmudgeons, kindly hold your hippie hate. I think tree planting is both doable and effective.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And the world moves on with or without us...

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That whole area smells like the gerbil cages at the old Woolworth's.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment