Construction Watch: Fenton Village
Comments
Leave a commentI like the blue bay windows because it adds a better touch of color and draws away from those dull dark greens and browns.
This is unrelated, but as I was driving down the scajaquada yesterday coming from the 190, I couldn't help but notice the run down warehouse to my left. A lot of us here have probably seen it too. Does anyone know if there is anything in store for it in the future, or is it just going to sit there? I had the name of it yesterday but I forgot.
I actually think the Light green would have been a great choice for the building.
If you are asking about the Niagara Lubricants facility that was heavily damaged by a fire last year, a plan to rebuild this structure just received incentives from the ECIDA this past Monday.
http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/news/2012/08/20/niagara-lubricants-takes-step-to.html
I think he's actually referring to The Yard or whatever the name of that building that was going to be housing for Buff State students.
Not only The Yard, how about the larger (4-5 floor) structure to its east. The one that looks bombed out. I think that site was a complicated federal arson case many, many years ago. The two properties together make that western-most part of the 198 a Rust-belt hell hole.
On the same note, the stretch of the 190 south of the 198 reinforces the notion our city is depressed. If the backside of all structures on the west side of Niagara St. could be enticed to clean up their act, it would make a better impression to out-of-towners, and locals. Rich Products is the only site that looks acceptable. You'd think Mayor Brown would get all stakeholders -- State, rail line, property owners -- together to create a corridor makeover. It's a critical corridor that can't remain "as is."
Actually it was "The Yard" which looked like something from Chernobyl. The lubricant factory on the right was also in my peripheral vision but the warehouse caught my eye.
That day I was near Buff State when it happened. I was choking on the smoke because it was only a few blocks away. I was in the Upton Hall and it was terrible.
"Actually it was "The Yard" which looked like something from Chernobyl."
Props for saying something new with Chernobyl instead of Beirut. I've so had it with goofy comparisons to Beirut. Maybe you can start a new meme.
This is a great addition to that neighborhood, now we need to start to see some more work on the east side of main. If one side of the street can get 1000 a month rents why not the other side. Within the next 10 years or so it would be nice to see some projects going along the east side of main at least a block or two in to try and clean up the area and help revitalize the neighborhood.
Although it looks like their site plans are already in motion, I do hope Sinatra will consider geothermal! Karl Frizlen's adaptive reuse project on Connecticut Street is using geothermal, with the installation taking place on a very small lot to the side of the building. Compared to Karl's project, Sinatra has more land available at the Main/Ferry site. I'm sure Karl would be glad to give a tour and describe what they're doing. Go geothermal!
BTW, way to go on the stormwater management. Now if Sinatra, in partnership with neighborhood stakeholders and the preservation community, also pursues adaptive reuse options for the great 1524 Main Street, he'll score 100% -- with bonus points -- on the hero scale!!
I'd love to hear an update on the Horsefeathers building project. I spoke to Karl Frizlen a couple of months ago (shortly after the building had been purchased) and he told me they had already started interior demolition.
1000.00 per month ! oh yeh thats how they keep the rats out !
I'm very happy to hear about this as well as all the other 'upscale loft' and hotel construction going on, it really is wonderful.
Are there any rehab projects to create affordable housing for non-upscale clientele?
Mixed use means both commercial and residential space as well as mixed price housing in the same geographical area. People of all economic strata need to be able to walk and live on the same streets and shop at the same grocery stores. It promotes social responsibility.
Thanks
The reason is that Rehab projects cost a ton of money to do no matter what material you use. Most apartment buildings sell for around $40,000 a unit in the Buffalo area. And these rehab projects cost a ton more than that. So it is really difficult to make brand new apartments that are for non upscale clientele. The only way, I think, would be to make them small, but those wouldn't be in demand.
What about the HOME project right across the street.
I agree with you about cities needing to have a mix of people from all economic levels, but I think Tom is pretty much correct about the issues at play. Without heavy public subsidies, it is difficult to make new construction affordable. (Although part of that is due to zoning codes that make it difficult to build smaller apartments without off-street parking, etc.)
I am always reminded by the quote from Jane Jacobs about why cities need old buildings. New (or renovated) buildings are for high-rent people and businesses, and older and smaller spaces provide room for lower-income people and lower-margin businesses.
Well I know that HOME just opened their new building right across the street and it has affordable housing. But I'm not sure there is much in between the two in the area
There is a project on Jersey St that is affordable the horse stables or whatever they are calling it.
The only issue it that Buffalo doesn't have a problem with affordable housing. 95% of the housing in Buffalo is affordable.
Not to mention the fact that HUD is holding funds because of City leaderships shady dealings and complete lack of accountablity.
This is a great addition to the neighborhood. As the President of the Oxford Square Neighborhood Association, I am thrilled to see new investment in the neighborhood. The Fenton is making a total transformation, as is the neighborhood on the whole, all in just a few short years.
For those who don't see any "inbetween" housing options, I can say that the entire street is "inbetween." Rents on Oxford vary tremendously, from the almost-too-cheap to the run-of-the-mill $750-8 you see elsewhere in the village. Most homes are owner-occupied, and we are really starting to see all the old vacant ones getting bought and renovated. This neighborhood is the last bastion of the Elmwood Village and I think Sinatra ahead of the game here.
It's beautifully diverse (and I hope it stays that way) and it also has so much potential. I'm very curious to see how 1000/mnth tenants integrate with the neighborhood, especially since you (gasp!) will see black people from the balconies.
Regardless, the Fenton was always a problem for the community and I'm glad that it's being re-used. We're a "Neighborhood on the Rise" and this project demonstrates faith in that mission. Investors take notice! :)
What an unnecessary and stupid statement--why would you assume that the new tenants would have an aversion to ("gasp!") "black people".
Also, isn't the undertone of your statement to promote continued gentrification of your neighborhood? Such activity would, likely, only continue to push out said "gasp!" "black people".
Be nice to Weiss -- she's good people :-) I helped out with a neighborhood cleanup that CityCorps organized there last year, and I think they're very consciously trying to improve the conditions and quality of life in the neighborhood without "gentrifying" it. I use quotes, because the periodic online dustups about that term demonstrate that it means different things to different people.
That said, using "black" and "white" in blog discussions -- especially in a highly segregated city like Buffalo (according to stats, don't shoot the messenger) -- can be easily misconstrued and is a quick way to have a discussion taken down a path never intended. #Protip.
Pretty sure I said "integration" not gentrification. How do you get desire for gentrification out of "It's beautifully diverse and I hope it stays that way?"
I said I'm curious to see how that goes because I guarantee that will be on their minds when they are paying 1000/mnth to live in primarily a low-income neighborhood that still has some problems with crime and vandalism (15 Oxford which is right across the street from the Fenton was raided by a SWAT team about a month ago and there was a shooting on the other end of Oxford about two months ago). Listen, as a white person living in the neighborhood, I know from experience the "is it ok to park on the street?" type questions I still get when people unfamiliar with the neighborhood come visit. It is mostly a very safe and friendly community, we have a strong block club with members from all walks of life, and most people really care about making it better. All I said was that I'm curious to see how quickly he can rent out these 1000/mnth apts in this neighborhood at this time. I said it was a welcome addition because it's alot better than the tenement the building was before. Period. Again, please explain how you get "we want gentrification" out of that?
But you also implied that all the people paying $1000 per month in the new apartments would be racist white people. So you can't be so coy about it now.
Aside from that I agree with you on the difficulties of this location for luxury apartments. I noticed that right after HOME finished their project, a (possibly) homeless person claimed the front step on the corner of Ferry and Main. He's there almost every day & night sometimes sleeping on the pavement. HOME doesn't seem to mind him there... or maybe they don't realize he's even there since they never crack open their window blinds. Scenes like that won't do much to promote luxury living next door!
Thank goodness for the Pan-Am otherwise half the people in Buffalo would have nowhere to live!
Glad to see this project getting underway. But I worry that this is going to be a bust. As weissingaround said there is crime in the neighborhood. I don't know if someone is willing to pay $1,000 to live in a neighborhood that is not completely safe. Just as weissingaround is curious, I am too, I don't feel it will rent out quickly. Its an expensive project, and seems to be quite the risk for a less experienced developer. Hopefully all goes well, because the project looks great, but the financials don't seem to work in my mind, although obviously i don't know where/at what rate Mr. Sinatra is getting his money.
But $2.3 million for 23 units is $100,000. The average apartment building sells for around $35,000 a unit in Buffalo. The rents aren't outrageously high, but I think it will be tough to rent as mentioned before. They will probably have low utility bills because of the new green tech, which is huge, but there is still taxes, insurance, maintenance (which will be minimal), and management (which I think he already has in place for other buildings). It seems like the rent isn't high enough to make money.. Obviously I hope it goes well, I am just skeptical, and I could definitely be missing something in my thinking.
Everyone wants this neighborhood to succeed.
I think it's counterproductive (and out of place in a public forum) to throw in the comments about race.
Ironic that you disagree with U.S. Attorney General Holder about what should be discussed in public forums:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29260098/ns/us_news-life/t/holder-us-nation-cowards-race/
Also funny is when progressive commenters on this public forum characterize neighborhoods such as S Buffalo or the First Ward as having issues with racial tolerance, like here for a recent example, I haven't noticed any complaining from you or anyone.
Saying that on a public forum about working class neighborhoods is apparently fine, but now it's finger waving time when weissing expresses curiosity about how much integrating upscalers will do.
(Side note to 300miles - the comment said "curious to see" about integrating with the neighborhood, not quite how you paraphrased it as "implied that all the people paying $1000 per month in the new apartments would be racist white people").
Anyhow, hamp - nice double standard about what's okay in a public forum - lol, or do you forget to complain about comments bringing up racism when it's about working class neighborhoods? I thought grad's comment in the S Buffalo thread was okay to post, and this one was too. It's what A.G. Holder, for one, says Americans should do.
Another irony is that if weissing had said the $1000/month tenants want to put non-whites in chains, or said who is or isn't clean and articulate … well, that sort of talk can launch someone into the Veepstakes of a certain party!
... Or how bout the love affair with grand old buildings (guilty), ignoring the fact that these structures were built and made possible by money from 'industrialist capitalist pigs?'
Built by the poor who were take advantage of by the "capitalist pigs". They were paid poorly while the guys with money made more of it. But back then a lot of the CEOs weren't earning millions of dollars of bonuses for running their companies into bankruptcy and collapsing the economy..
I understand that it was/is questionable from a moral standpoint but what I am saying is that a lot of the great estates and massively detailed public and private buildings that we all love were often made possible because of these inequities. Objectively, it is logically inconsistent of anyone to be a lover of equal outcomes and at the same time champion the remnants of the very inequities they claim to despise. Do you want an exquisitely detailed central terminal, FLW build, or Bethlehem Steel administration building? Do you admire the grand mansions on Delaware? Or do you want that money given back to the people in the form of higher wages instead? I know it doesn't have to be so black and white, but just had to point out this inconsistency in peoples' logic. I know myself for example that I look in awe of what was created off the backs of the lower class or whatever you want to call it. I'm not for it or against it necessarily but it is a valid observation.
Yes I agree with what you are saying. I just think that world history shows that the rich exploit the poor for their own gain, even today, all the time. I think people should be more aware of this. However, yes those mansions/buildings are really nice and I do admire them, but I don't admire the capitalist who abused people (poor working conditions, low wages). I certainly think they could have afforded to make working conditions safe, pay their workers more and still have money left over when building them. But that was how the market for labor was back then, not a ton of government regulations.
Its a very interesting concept, how much money is too much for rich people, and how much money is too little for laborers. And a lot of it is dictated by the market (how much money someone is willing to do a job for), but we do have regulations (minimum wage, safety) that control it now. Although some think that minimum wage, specifically, is too low and although people take minimum wage jobs they don't have money left over to spend or even live decently. And are taken advantage of by the rich person giving them that job (if the rich person is in fact rich and profitable of course). I mean I think we can all agree McDonalds, Burger King etc. could all pay their workers $10 an hour and still make a huge profit. Right? Obviously they wouldn't make as much but those are huge profitable corporations, and their corporate people are paid well. On the other hand there might be a ma and pop coffee shop that may only afford to pay someone $8 an hour. I find this scenario unlikely $2 an hour is only $4,000 more a year (full time) really not a big difference, they would just have to raise their prices a small bit, but that could also have business consequences. So its definitely an interesting discussion probably not meant to come out of this posting hah..
Racism always has and always will by hypocritical.
I ran across this promotional piece for the Home project which is now known as Oxford Commons apartments:
Theres a trail blazer for every devleopment success story..here here to Sinatra for kicking it off and heres to 10-15 more developments from Kensington to the medical campus just like this one.
On that note..ditto on the neighborhood, these will be niche apartments because as stated above you can get a much better neighborhood for $1k+ a month elsewhere in Buffalo. 2 blocks west your in the best neighborhood(s) in Erie County for the same price. Without seeing/dealing with the garbage (use your imagination) on Main Street daily. Honestly I can look beyond whats infront of me and see true potential in the most BUT there is truly no excuse for the condition of midtown and the actions of its pedestrians, I don't care what color you are..Main Street is atrocious.
These will be perfect for those round the clock on demand Doctors/Doctors to be at the medical campus. A thousand a month is cheap ..these will be rented to people who need a place to park their car..close to work..safe, convenient and enjoy the amenities the City has to offer during their free time and to get back to the hospital when needed. These will not be your dog walking, spot coffee drinking, vegetable gardening yuppie inhabitants from further West.
I am glad this went off on the interesting tangents it did because the attitudes reflected in some of these posts are so "Buffalo." Embedded in the discussion are the old prejudices of this once so ethnically segregated city and the hopes for a new vision in which geography does not dictate the barriers they once did.
Most Buffalonians will tell you that Main St. is the line of demarcation that separates the city. Just look at maps of preservation districts When it comes to this barrier, to speak of black and white is fair game and not necessarily racist. It became the line drawn in the sand and, if we are honest about it, that is what it is. Yes, the black/white divide is a Buffalo reality and therefore has a valid place in this forum.
Then there is this "border neighborhood" That I will call for the sake of this post the Oxford/Harvard are which includes this. Linwood at one time didn't want to include it. The "nicer neighborhoods to the west didn't want it either. Sure, it was west of Main, but it wasn't good enough for inclusion. The reason I heard cited the most was that the housing stock of these few streets were not of good quality nor were they historical.
Effectively, it created this marginal pocket that had predictable outcomes. The area didn't thrive as did streets to the south and west. Let's face it, the lack of investment and community is visible.
Fenton Village is an enormous step to including this area. Hopefully, this will inspire the property owners. I bet the residents want desperately to be included in the prosperity of their nearby neighborhoods rather than be treated as marginal step children.
Didn't people pick up on the enthusiasm and pride of the President of the Oxford Square Neighborhood Association? This is a group primed to bring change and ready to invest what they have. They have hope, energy, and a willingness to be included respectfully with the others south of Forest and west of Main effectively becoming the last piece of the puzzle in the incomplete picture. In essence, they were invited (finally) and they feel worthy of accepting. And it's about time.
And she got slammed for it...just like old times.
Why not welcome, encourage and support them? Save the racial issues, the arguments about gentrification and its ill effects for another time as thay are irrelevant now and may remain so.
Well, I do disagree with you that the topic of racism is "not relevant"--clearly, it is.
I do apologize to Weiss for "slamming her", as you say, as it was harsh. However, I found her comment about potential Fenton tenants' inherent racism just out of line.
As someone else said, we all want these blocks to thrive--as well as Main St., the East Side, etc. The block club(s), HOME and Sinatra seem to all be part of the revival.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Unbelievable...the transformation of the most ugly corner on Main St. Now the Willowby (sp?) Insurance bldg on the southeast corner needs to go.
It's Willoughby. And I agree -- it needs to go Willoughbyebye (the building, not the business).
One of these days, as property values and demand for new-build housing improve, perhaps a developer will approach Willoughby and offer to improve the return on their land by building a nice mixed-use building, with them as the primary tenant on the ground floor. Now that would be most cool.