City August 14, 2012 9:51 AM

City's response to missed bike lane opportunity on Main Street

City’s response to missed bike lane opportunity on Main Street
Following is the response that several people were emailed yesterday after they contacted City Hall about the paving and re-striping on Main Street that was featured August 1st on Buffalo Rising (see here). Here's the response from The City:

Commissioner,

We have received several inquiries as to why bicycle lanes were not included in the recent restriping plan for Main Street between Delavan Avenue and Humboldt Parkway.  I offer to you the following reasons why bicycle facilities were not included on this stretch of Main Street at this time:

Purpose and cause for this restriping project
The main reason why this project was undertaken at this time was in an attempt to mitigate the problem of recurring crashes into the center median in front of Sisters Hospital.  Shifting of the northbound traffic lanes at a point further south of this median was determined to be the most effective measure that could be taken to improve public safety.  The addition of bicycle lanes to this section of roadway would necessitate an even further lateral shift of traffic to avoid contact with the median. 

Traffic volume
This section of Main Street has an Average Daily Traffic volume of 22,675 vehicles (among the highest volumes in the city) and is also established as a Truck Route.  Guidance in the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide suggests using treatments which provide greater separation between bicycle and motor vehicle traffic on streets with high traffic volume and regular truck traffic.  The pavement width on this section of Main is not enough to provide necessary separation on-street.  The appropriate treatment for this section of Main would be separated from the pavement to the west of Main Street and would come at a substantial cost (in excess of 20% of the entire project).

Connectivity
The department has several planned improvements thru 2014 (see map below) that are designed to enhance the connectivity of bicycle routes throughout the City.  This small section of Main Street would not serve as a meaningful connection at this time and due to its limited distance, may not provide the intended safety benefits of a bicycle lane.  Further connections along Main Street are being considered for the next phase of bicycle route planning, thru 2018.  This gives us time to properly plan and identify funds for a more appropriate treatment (i.e. the installation of a separated path) on this section of Main.

Parallel routes
Included as part of the planned improvements thru 2014 are a combination of bicycle lanes and shared lane markings on Humboldt Parkway to the east of Main and Elmwood Avenue to the west of Main.  These parallel routes provide alternates for travel to and from many of the destinations which would be accessed via Main Street.

One of the key elements of Complete Streets is that while it is important to consider all modes of transportation, not all modes are appropriate for all streets in all contexts.  In this case, multiple collisions with an inanimate object located between the curb lines necessitated a restriping project to correct this specific problem.  It would have been inappropriate to add on-street bicycle lanes into the equation on a high volume thoroughfare with regular truck traffic while introducing a lane shift until further resources are identified to ensure we are accommodating bicyclists in a safe manner and in accordance with national best practices identified in NACTO's Urban Bikeway Design Guidelines.

Respectfully,
Eric Schmarder
Senior Engineer

1-Bike_Lanes-biker-Buffalo-NY.jpg
^Click to enlarge

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

They should at least redo the crappy sidewalks, maybe even make one side asphalt.

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

C'mon Schmarder, do better than that.

You're claim that this section would not be a meaningful bicycle link is only due to the fact that the city and your department was short sighted enough to not include bicycle lanes anywhere on the entire main street reconstruction project. Had the city decided to build a good, complete street in the first place, this would be an extremely meaningful link.

Yes, NACTO is correct, it would be better to have barriers between the heavy Main Street traffic than not. But having dedicated lanes is FAR SAFER than just putting bicycles in with that heavy traffic - which is what the city has chosen to do here. THAT IS CRAZY! And there are examples of urban streets all over the united states and canada that are truck routes and carry more traffic, in a smaller right of way that have bicycle lanes. That is complete laziness. Have you ever been on some of the thoroughfares in Chicago?

The parallel routes solution is BS. There is no street in the city that is adequately parallel to Main Street. The most important section for Main to have bicycle lanes is north of W. Ferry Street to UB South - because there are no parallel roadways. Its a completely unique thoroughfare in the city because it slices across the street grid in a way no other street does. There is no other route anywhere near as direct.

And back to you're "not a meaningful connection" point. This is a College Campus here?! How much more of a meaningful connection do you need? Canisius should be connected via bicycles to Elmwood, downtown, parkside, etc.

This is a total failure on the part of the City and DPW. You find every reason not to do what would be progressive.

Score: 13 ( 23 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually, I think Eric Schmarder's reasoning is mostly sound, given the financial constraints the city is under. It gives me great optimism that the city is using NACTO as a best practices reference instead of just old car-first thinking from the likes of NYSDOT, etc. I honestly think the DPW is moving in a progressive direction, albeit quite slowly. Look what has been done recently with streets like Porter, South Park, Seneca, etc. That would never have happened even 10 years ago. The problem is they have been waiting until the entire street is scheduled for a complete reconstruction instead of proactively creating projects for the purpose of adding bicycle lanes, as they are doing in other cities.

I just want to see follow-through where the city actually does create a separated path here (and one that addresses some of the risks of separated paths, like increased conflict at intersections). My worry is that what we end up with is the status quo of some people bicycling in uncomfortable conditions on the street as it is, and many more people choosing not to bicycle there because the conditions are too stressful and uncomfortable.

Chicago is a good example to bring up. When Rahm Emanuel became mayor, he announced (and has so far followed through on) a plan to build 100 miles of protected bicycle lanes in his four year term of office. Buffalo is moving at a sloth's pace by comparison.

replied to townline
Score: 9 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I disagree. Main Street is already in the midst of its entire reconstruction. That was the time to add lanes, all the way from the city line to downtown. The failure to do so is a total lack of foresight and laziness. This section is a continuation of this. Bicycle lanes could have been added here - it does not have to be a physically separated bicycle way. A total and continued missed opportunity.

replied to JSmith
Score: 7 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I absolutely agree that the reconstruction of upper Main Street was a colossal missed opportunity. But that project was probably designed about 10 years ago (it was already under construction when I moved back here in 2004). Complete Streets wasn't the law here then, nor was there the national momentum towards bicycle infrastructure that we've seen in the last five years or so in New York, Portland, Chicago, etc.

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Apparently I don't know which "your" to use. My wife will be ashamed.

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What lazy morons. How is it that cities, internationally, can find solutions? I agree this is a TOTAL failure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregated_cycle_facilities

Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, if you read his letter, a segregated cycle facility is the proposed solution for this section of Main, but the cost would have exceeded 20% of the current pave-and-restripe project, which is one of the valid reasons for not including it in the current project under the Complete Streets ordinance.

I wonder, though, whether that analysis was done in the design phase of the project, or after the fact as a reaction to the inquiries that were raised about the project.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hopefully in the future they will consider these. Imbibe case, in Montreal I think, there was a 40% increase in bike ridership. It would be cool if Buffalo was known as a safe bike riding city in the future.

replied to JSmith
Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree that this is not a practical addition for the resurfacing part that is taking place. However, the bike lanes should have been constructed when they tore everything to hell. This is an important corridor and should have bike lanes. It is even more important because of the heavy traffic. That was bush league Buffalo, bush league! Now suck it up, spend the money and fix your mistake.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One more thing. Why are the new crosswalks on Main Street so narrow?

You have to walk across them "single file". Please make them wider. They look out of scale for such a wide street, and they look cheap.

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe they can just redo the mountain bike trail alongside Main at the cemetery's edge. With a little work, someone with a normal bike might be able to use that without popping a tire.

Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think the city should reconsider truck routes too!

Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Trucks have to go somewhere to make deliveries and get from warehouses and factories to highways.
These roads need to be designed from the start to handle the extra load, from the subbase up otherwise you're going to get an extremely short and expensive lifespan in a road. (Wear on roads increases exponentially with weight, which is why there are truck routes and weight limits for many side streets)

So in the short-term, you really can't reconsider truck routes without massively improving roads you're shifting to.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

B U DOUBLE HOCKEY STICKS.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Interesting that the streetscape improvements for Clinton, East Lovejoy, and East Delavan (including bike lanes) announced today in this Buffalo News article: http://www.buffalonews.com/city/communities/east-side/article1004138.ece are absent from that map.

I recently just got back into biking and have done most of it after 11:00pm to avoid any potential conflicts with vehicles. It's amazing how bikeable the city really is thanks in part to the incredibly flat topography. I can't wait until the day that every radial has bike lanes... they're sure wide enough! I love having the bike path that runs along Linear Park in the University Heights. It's like a multi-modal backdoor to Main Street. Here's hoping they continue to extend it in either direction utilizing Rails to Trails funding.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like night riding, too, especially on a hot summer day when it's cooler at night, but I sometimes worry about drunk drivers not paying attention and not seeing me (even though I have three bright tail lights on my bike).

Do you feel safe riding on the abandoned railroad path in the University Heights? It seems like a useful shortcut, but I've always been too nervous about getting jumped to use it as part of my regular commute. It seems very secluded and there certainly have been several robberies around there in the past couple of years.

replied to DTK2OD
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I ride along the paved portion of the bike path that runs from Heath St to the park and ride lot at LaSalle. It's relatively well lit and I've seen more and more people biking, jogging, and walking dogs along it. The block clubs that abut it have started making that whole Linear Park area a priority with about a dozen or so new trees, some interesting flower beds, and regular clean ups. We're currently working on getting a community garden started on a vacant parcel at the end of W. Winspear. The aim is to reclaim all the green space up to the berm of the rail line. It could really be a great space with a little love and some attention from the City.

But yes, the abandoned railroad adjacent to that area is a little dodgy, but so much potential and still a huge asset!

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Considering that Main Street is part of "New York State Bicycle Route 517," I feel that it is absolutely pathetic that the city can't even put shared bicycle lane markers in the right lane. Maybe it would help cut down on the amount of drivers that honk at me daily because I'm on the shoulder of the right lane instead of the sidewalk.

I tried to bike on the sidewalk last week. I came inches from getting run over by someone making a right turn. It's only a matter of time before my bike and I will need an emergency ride up the rest of Main to Sisters.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

At least the roads will be wide enough for the ambulance, then!

replied to Shaun
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly as I stated in another thread. Bicyclists are no more entitled to lanes in every street than heavy truck drivers. Some streets are just wrong for either transportation mode. But that won't stop the whining and complaining...

Score: -5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a fundamental question, but why is it normal for bike lanes to share the roadway with auto traffic? It would seem to me to make a lot more sense to narrow the roads, widen the sidewalks and have cyclists share with pedestrians instead.

I enjoy riding but will only do it on dedicated bike paths or on the sidewalk. When you see what drivers are doing every day, the risk is just unacceptable in my opinion.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's really not safe for pedestrians when bikes are on the sidewalk right next to them. And it's really not safe for cyclists when they are on the sidewalk trying to cross a side street while a car is turning. The cars can't see them in time.

replied to Chris
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Moved from Buffalo 12 yrs ago, and I see the same, old, tired thinking prevails. Too many old, stubborn, curmudgeons that need to die off, and then maybe young, progressive people can start having a voice.
It's estimated 10,000 (yes 10-thousand!) people commute to my downtown Portland on bikes. Another 1,000 commute by skateboard. Why, because our awesome metro leaders (we have a metro govt of 3 counties as to avoid duplication of services) could see the future!
I looked at the map of bike lanes. Pathetic. Although sometimes, of course, there are car-bike conflicts, but for the most part, everyone gets along and shares the road.

Many cities visit Portland or consult with leaders and experts here as to how to successfully implement bike lanes. Not the arrogant, back-room dealmakers from Buffalo.

Unless they are from out-of-town, there are no engineers, leaders, urban planners who even remotely know how to safely add bike lanes to existing streets.

Just one of the reasons I'm getting tired of having to defend Buffalo. The rest of the country, except for some architecture buffs, regards Buffalo as a dump.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

gpod, the good news is there are a lot of fresh thinkers in the rank-and-file of City Hall, especially in the planning department but also in public works. Assuming they stick around to climb the career ladder in their departments, things should get a lot better in 10 or 20 years. :-/

replied to gpod
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment