Another Main Street Missed Opportunity
Comments
Leave a commentWell, bicycle lanes from one end of a college campus to the other just wouldn't make sense anyways, right? Good job City Hall... proving your excellence once again.
This stretch of Main Street and Delavan between Main/Jefferson and Bidwell should absolutely be made more bike friendly (and in the case of Delavan, more pedestrian friendly too). You've got the one of the main connections between a college campus and Elmwood strip which should be easily accessible by bike or on foot, and the road design basically prohibits these modes of transportation.
I ride my bike to mass at Canisius every so often and cut through Forest Lawn instead of riding along Delavan because of how poorly its laid out...there's no lane markings at all, drivers treat it as two lanes each way, then it suddenly turns into 3 lanes when it reaches Delaware. Not to mention the "bus stop" at the corner of Linwood and Delavan, which is just a small patch of busted up concrete. There's no reason Delavan can't be reworked to be one lane of traffic in both directions with bike lanes, and a sidewalk installed running along the Forest Lawn fence.
Welcome to Buffalo - not just antidevelopment, but they can't even follow their own laws and codes. City hall is what needs to change - the city is plagued with useless close-minded staff.
I agree this is not only really dumb, but also a violation of the Complete Streets policy. My guess is that the City is saying they don't have to follow that as the design was adopted before the policy was passed. No?
I agree about the horribility of that section of sidewalk -- especially the west side of the street in the winter as Forest Lawn doesn't seem to clear it.
You mean the North side of West Delavan? That's just a beaten path.
Jeff, nope, I mean the west side of Main along the cemetery. So off, as you say, the beaten path.
And For reasons beyond comprehension, Byron Brown has a sky high approval rating. You get what you vote for. If ever there was a need for a grassroots organizational movement, it would be to cleanup the self-interested political machine in city hall. If the politicians control the campaign message, and no one other than another self-interested politician running against him gets to counter and control the message, the electorate is misinformed.
Comment of the week right there. FTW
I am not sure how much responsibility the mayor has for the Department of Public Works. I suppose it is the mayor's job to "set the agenda" and make sure all city departments are working towards the right goals, but this is more a case of "the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing". It's a fundamental communication problem throughout city government (see the recent hubbub about whether the city can collect housing court fines or not), and not something just changing the mayor will fix.
I'm a little confused by you downplaying his responsibility, since the mayor chooses the upper management of the DPW and can replace them, or order them to do things differently, etc.
Aside from that, are you guys really certain the law wasn't followed? It allows for not adding bike lanes etc if in their judgment (based on safety for example) it's a bad idea, but says they have to put in writing their reasons for deciding that.
Is it possible they did put it in writing somewhere and thus followed the law even if you disagree with their decision? (Just asking - I've no idea either way.)
I agree that "the fish rots from the head", but I'm just saying the lack of communication between city departments is a systemic problem that has existed long before Byron Brown, and (since he's made little real effort to fix it) will probably exist for the next mayor.
Your latter questions are the same ones I asked. But I am very doubtful the provisions of the law are being followed.
js - In your 1st comment in this thread, the law you linked says in section C.4 the Commissioner of Public Works shall confirm in writing to the Common Council any determination that "bike and/or pedestrian facilities" would cause a safety problem for any project
(here's link again for convenience if anyone wants to see exact wording)
http://www.buffalocompletestreets.org/docs/BFLO_Adopted_CompleteStreets.pdf
The law doesn't require a bike lane, and if I'm reading it correctly it doesn't even state a time deadline by which the written determination must be filed. It's possible either of those might the kind of loophole to which Mike's article referred.
Your 2nd para in that comment up at top makes accusations which look to be assuming Mr. Stepniak didn't submit anything in writing to the Council.
js>"Perhaps someone should bring legal action against the city for for violating the Complete Street ordinance. This isn't the first time a road maintenance project was performed without any consideration of the Complete Streets law."
Several other commenters also accuse law breaking.
So I was just curious if any of you doing that accusing have any basis other than a guess.
For example, have any of you guys at least tried a quick email to Mr. Stepniak asking if he filed it? His email address is on right of the DPW page:
http://www.ci.buffalo.ny.us/Home/City_Departments/Public_Works_Parks_Streets
And/or how about asking any of the 3 council members who your link says sponsored the law - Rivera, LoCurto, & Golombek - (or anyone on their their staffs, or any council member at all), if anything in writing was received? Their email addresses & office phone #s are easily found on the city web site.
If you tried and none of those four replied, then I'd agree that's a bad sign.
If he ignored the law, he deserves criticism.
But if nobody even tried to find out and just accused first, then maybe that says something also.
I agree that the law could have more teeth. As it is written, it leaves the exceptions quite open-ended.
You are correct that my statement (and this article) are based largely on conjecture. To remedy that, I have emailed my councilman, Mike LoCurto (whose district also includes the west side of Main Street in the area in question), and Justin Booth, the chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board. Mike LoCurto is also on the Council's Transportation Committee, so he may have extra insight into this. I will follow up when I get a response.
Thank you for spurring me to write that email. You are right that it is often easier and more comfortable to complain on a forum like this than to make an official query or complaint.
Here is the response that was forwarded to me by Mike LoCurto, from the city's Senior Engineer:
We have received several inquiries as to why bicycle lanes were not included in the recent restriping plan for Main Street between Delavan Avenue and Humboldt Parkway. I offer to you the following reasons why bicycle facilities were not included on this stretch of Main Street at this time:
- Purpose and cause for this restriping project
o The main reason why this project was undertaken at this time was in an attempt to mitigate the problem of recurring crashes into the center median in front of Sisters Hospital. Shifting of the northbound traffic lanes at a point further south of this median was determined to be the most effective measure that could be taken to improve public safety. The addition of bicycle lanes to this section of roadway would necessitate an even further lateral shift of traffic to avoid contact with the median.
- Traffic volume
o This section of Main Street has an Average Daily Traffic volume of 22,675 vehicles (among the highest volumes in the city) and is also established as a Truck Route. Guidance in the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide suggests using treatments which provide greater separation between bicycle and motor vehicle traffic on streets with high traffic volume and regular truck traffic. The pavement width on this section of Main is not enough to provide necessary separation on-street. The appropriate treatment for this section of Main would be separated from the pavement to the west of Main Street and would come at a substantial cost (in excess of 20% of the entire project).
- Connectivity
o The department has several planned improvements thru 2014 (see attached map) that are designed to enhance the connectivity of bicycle routes throughout the City. This small section of Main Street would not serve as a meaningful connection at this time and due to its limited distance, may not provide the intended safety benefits of a bicycle lane. Further connections along Main Street are being considered for the next phase of bicycle route planning, thru 2018. This gives us time to properly plan and identify funds for a more appropriate treatment (i.e. the installation of a separated path) on this section of Main.
- Parallel routes
o Included as part of the planned improvements thru 2014 are a combination of bicycle lanes and shared lane markings on Humboldt Parkway to the east of Main and Elmwood Avenue to the west of Main. These parallel routes provide alternates for travel to and from many of the destinations which would be accessed via Main Street.
One of the key elements of Complete Streets is that while it is important to consider all modes of transportation, not all modes are appropriate for all streets in all contexts. In this case, multiple collisions with an inanimate object located between the curb lines necessitated a restriping project to correct this specific problem. It would have been inappropriate to add on-street bicycle lanes into the equation on a high volume thoroughfare with regular truck traffic while introducing a lane shift until further resources are identified to ensure we are accommodating bicyclists in a safe manner and in accordance with national best practices identified in NACTO’s Urban Bikeway Design Guidelines.
Respectfully,
Eric Schmarder
Senior Engineer
As a cyclist and pedestrian, I actually like the medians on Main Street in the Heights. Bike lanes would be nice, but the street is much nicer looking and much smoother to travel or cross as a pedestrian. The traffic can be a lot but you just take a lane. I would prefer those medians rather than another 10' of asphalt on that road.
I didn't start bicycling regularly until after Main Street was under construction (it was actually a pretty pleasant ride when traffic was slowed by the construction!), but I would rather have bike lanes than those medians. When I am riding my bicycle, Main Street feels simultaneously wide and constrained, with narrow lanes that don't allow a car and bike to safely share space, but with an expectation of speed that encourages frustrated aggressive behavior by motorists who are forced to change lanes to pass me safely.
I do take the whole right lane, but I get honked/yelled at and passed too closely on large stretches of Main. So I generally take calmer but less direct routes through the side streets. (Though that isn't always possible because of the way the old railroad line cuts the Heights off of the rest of North Buffalo.)
Projects like this take a very long time to go from dpw desk to laying asphalt. Proactive action by this regions citizens is much more constructive than criticism when a job is finished. Although I agree with you, my means would be different.
Complete Streets has been law in Buffalo since May of 2008. I have a hard time believing a "repave as is" project has been moving the pipeline for more than four years.
I ride my bike from Parkside down to the Medical Campus daily and this stretch of Main needed repaving badly. I have had people scream "get on the sidewalk" as they drive by. It's treacherous further south in the mornings, but I get nervous traveling on Michigan Avenue with a computer and wallet in my backpack east of Main, so I'll take my chances!
This is REALLY annoying. The city absolutely needs to follow its own ordinances and show some foresight, no matter how old-fashioned and out of touch its traffic designers and DPW staff is... Judging by how many people bike in Buffalo even on streets that don't have bike lanes, a bike lane here would be well-used.
As a resident of University Park I was around when the City was planning the reconstruction of Main Street and there was enthusiastic support for the center medians. Cite your "much Opposition"
Inattentive drivers and plows are not a good excuse for criticizing them.
They have calmed traffic and they are aesthetically pleasing and relate to the medians in the University Park Neighborhood.
I for one am glad they were installed.
Since when do primary thoroughfares need bike lanes? Are you kidding? The 'complete streets' movement is an utter crock. Mixing every conceivable form of transportation on one street is dangerous and unnecessary. Bike lanes along parallel routes with far less traffic is what Buffalo needs, not some all-inclusive congestion monster.
sounds good in theory, until you understand the geography of this location. thanks to the highway passing under main street, there *are* no viable alternative routes to get across the highway, whether you are a car, bike, or pedestrian.
the average cyclist has made the same rational calculus as the average driver, namely that main street is the best or only way that they can get from point a to point b.
Other cities build bike overpasses to deal with that. How hard is it?
And how exactly would a bike overpass get me to Talking Leaves, Shango, Amy's Place, Music City, etc., etc.?
All well and good until you actually want to ride your bike to one of the many businesses and other destinations on Main Street. Why should people on bicycles or on foot be made to feel threatened and uncomfortable whenever they want to go out to eat, to a bookstore, or to one of the many schools located on upper Main Street?
Why does your convenience and comfort as a motorist count more than that of people using other forms of transportation (because of choice or necessity)?
In Long Beach, CA, they have a street similar to Elmwood Ave called 2nd Street. It's full of cars, walkers, and bikers. There was no room to expand the road to accommodate bikers, so they painted a green line (4ft wide) through a lane that reminded drivers to share the road with bikers in that lane with signage printed on it every 50 yrds or so. Driver's then follow bikers in their lane, fine with moving a bit slower.
You could accomplish this on Main. Especially because for the majority of this repave, there are three lanes to choose from.
If planners in Buffalo ever traveled once in a while, they'd see there's more that can be done, and on the cheap.
I agree, but why is everyone leaving their comments about this egregious oversight here? Why not call Byron and log your complaint with him. That'd get some attention.
indeed. call it in, everyone.
http://www.city-buffalo.com/Home/City_Departments/Citizens_Services/311_Self-Service
I live near Main & Fillmore and work near Main & Bryant. You'd think it would make all the sense in the world to bike to work and back via Main, right? No thanks. Biking Main or Delaware in rush hour is so stressful and unpleasant that it has led me to take this seemingly absurd, yet wonderfully car-free path: Jewett to the park, around the ring and over the pedestrian bridge to the other side of Delaware, through the park to Lincoln, to Bidwell, all the way to Richmond bike path, then to Bryant and back to Delaware. I'd say it takes nearly twice as long, but is well worth the effort to avoid hateful drivers.
While bicycle lanes in Buffalo WOULD be great, there are a couple obstacles that NEED to be dealt with. Actually, just ONE: proper bicycle operation; meaning, understanding that ONE-WAY streets are ONE-WAY, AND DON'T RIDE AGAINST TRAFFIC.
Main Street is dangerous. I'm happy the city didn't think to put in a bicycle lane, I'd rather ride through Delaware, North Park, and North Buffalo to get to work at UB Campus from Richmond.
Everyone drives hastily and greedily on main street.
Granted it would be NICE, however, on most Buffalo streets with the wealth of space available that could be used to implement bicycle lanes, I wouldn't ride them unless they did something like this -> http://www.dot.state.oh.us/districts/D12/PlanningEngineering/Pages/Lorain-Carnegie%28HopeMemorial%29BikewayImprovements.aspx
This road layout allows for those numbskulls who ride against traffic to stay on the sidewalk/lane combo path and more skiled cyclists to ride on the road in a comfy 12' wide lane...perhaps it could be diminished to 6'.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Is there really a "loophole", or was the Complete Streets ordinance simply ignored? Is there any record that Complete Streets features were evaluated and deemed to cost more than 20% of the cost of the entire project (very doubtful)? That is one of only three exceptions allowed by the law for this street, and if one of the exceptions was taken there should be documentation of it with the Common Council and the city's Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Board.
Perhaps someone (GO Bike Buffalo? The Advisory Board?) should bring legal action against the city for violating the Complete Streets ordinance. This isn't the first time a road maintenance project was performed without any consideration of the Complete Streets law.
Here is the law, by the way. It's quite short and simple.
http://www.buffalocompletestreets.org/docs/BFLO_Adopted_CompleteStreets.pdf