Theodore Roosevelt Inaugural Site Gets Some Breathing Room
Comments
Leave a commentLooks like the building next door now has a job to do to restore the windows that were covered over.
Now I'm confused: you can see that the neighboring building is getting windows back as a result of the demo -- windows that have been blocked for a half century. That would seem like a good thing for the value of that building -- not only more windows, but windows looking out on a nice landscape and National Historic Site -- hopefully leading it to be spruced up a bit. Yet the Roosevelt site renderings show that side of the neighboring building will be converted to a giant blank wall -- no windows at all. That doesn't make sense to me.
I'm guessing that was just an oversight by the person doing the rendering. It looks like the top row of windows were always usable, but in the rendering they're gone too. I doubt they would actually brick them over now after having them all this time! :)
I'm sure that (oversight) is right. There was no way for the Wilcox people to know that windows hid behind the BoA building's wall.
Now, that is one demo I don't think anyone would oppose.
Finally! Goodbye, to one of the most hideous buildings, in the area.
Apartments in the newly exposed building overlooking the Wilcox would be neat
"The Roosevelt" apartments FTW!
Already Taken: Main @ Carlton
But those were named for Bertha Roosevelt, beloved maternal grandmother of the developer who built them :-P
Fine, call 'em The Teddies.
Dear Hazeman,
There is a place in Buffalo for all styles of architecture. Its great that we have embraced our glorious past and have saved so many amazing buildings from their demise. However, just because you dont appreciate mid century architecture doesn't mean it doesn't add value to the fabric of our city. Unless your looking for a Disney-esque utopia of the antiquated Main street.
I dont disagree with the decision to remove this building in order to properly showcase a national historic site that may indeed increase tourism to the area. That being said, I really liked that "mad men" designed bank and will miss it.
There are good examples from different periods and there bad ones. Just as there are good and bad pieces of modern, Pomo, and brutalist, the same is the case with mid century. (hard to think of a bad example of art deco, though!) I too think that this building was nasty and obscured the wilcox but I generally love mcm. Seems like you're making a lot of assumptions about his comment.
Anyways, this is a great opportunity for the building next door to get a really nice makeover.
My Apology to Hazeman, I singled you out, but in re-reading the comments your not the only one with a disdain for mid century. Please pardon my mistake
Hazeman did not say he/she disliked mid-century modern, just this building. I love mid-century modern, but not this particular building. Don't jump to conclusions.
If we anticipate public opinion changing about architectural styles as time rolls along, we should develop a more intelligent approach to preservation and change. Currently, we are just reacting out of nostalgia which is bound to appear foolish in retrospect.
If this bank building were restored to its original condition and had a more appropriate location, I would probably like it.
Most of us look at MCM the way people looked at Victorian architecture in the 1950's - tear it down as soon as possible. It was a mistake then, and it is a mistake now.
Having said this, good riddance to this one. Any loss is offset 100 times by the improvement to the Roosevelt site.
I recall the bank lobby as being really pleasant.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye!
No!!! MUST SAVE!!!!
Ooops, too late.
Nope, Jesse, lol - it's
MUST RESTORE MR. WILCOX's LOWER-DENSITY SPRAWL!!!
(I agree the after will look better than before of course, and this is a good idea - but what would Jane Jacobs say about removing a to-the-sidewalk building in favor of all that open space? And the next time anyone complains about any new urban building daring to have a patch of grass or some bushes, well…)
Jane Jacobs would say nothing because this property has important historic value to Buffalo, western New York, and the country.
If it were your property then it would be a different matter (unless you have important historic value to which we are unaware).
Jane Jacobs would be rolling in her grave, unless she happens to still be alive, than she's probably rotissering somewhere in the Hamptons with a nearby wine spritzer, probably conversing with Diddy and Martha what a mess the Shinnecock casino will be.