NFL's New Blackout Policy Should Enhance Buffalo's Future in the League
Comments
Leave a commentYou're really grasping at straws. How a policy that will discourage ticket sales is beneficial to a new owner who will need as much revenue as possible is beyond me.
And doesn't Higgins have bigger issues to worry about than if Bills games will be blacked out ?
Considering the Bills are a tenent of the County owned stadium, hire hundreds of seasonal workers, have about 3 dozen or so millionaires on the payroll that contibute to local tax rolls as well to the local hospitality industry and that the team is a key marketing feature of our region I would assume our elected officials are doing everything possible to keep the team here.
The problem with small and midsize markets is that there isnt much room for error.
A team in a bigger city can afford to play with ticket prices and cable contracts etc. Getting it wrong and alienating loyal devoted fans is risky.
Does the team have to decide to opt-in or opt-out for the whole season? Or can they decide on a game by game basis.
Has to be for whole season, according to Chargers owner Spanos at the link a few comments below.
The Indianapolis colts already became the first team to state they will not be changing their policy. They will continue to blackout games that are not sold out, citing its important for them to prioritize ticket purchasing fans in a small market.
Yes, the Colts said they won't go along with this, and the Chargers owner sounds like he's saying the same thing here
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jul/02/new-blackout-policy-likely-wont-impact-chargers/
To answer Mike6133's question -
in the link above the Chargers owner Spanos says each team's decision about this must apply for the whole season - not selectively for certain games:
"… If a team lowers the bar for blackouts, the number is fixed for the season. Whenever the team clears the mark, it will be required to share more ticket revenue than usual with other teams in the league. It’s that part of the new rules that the Chargers believe would be too high a price to pay, said A.G. Spanos, the team’s executive vice president and chief executive officer.
"And even if you went to 15 percent lower, hypothetically an 85 percent manifest, that doesn't necessarily guarantee you a lift of the blackout for every game," Spanos said Monday. “It's also important to understand that the manifest is set for the year for every game, whether it's a big game for us or a game with a less attractive opponent."
…"
I don't understand how this is good for the Bills' fans. As of last year we had the majority of blackouts and the Bill's owners and management had a very clear way to prevent the blackout but they'd rather punish the fans than pony up 34 cents on the dollar. Now the NFL is allowing them to further skimp out by requiring only 85% sell-out to broadcast and who knows if the bills will even pony up then.
The blackout doesn't encourage ticket sales, it's merely a punishment for fans that don't go to games. Other markets see this and ensure their games are technically sold out so their fans can see the gam. The Bills don't care enough too. Ralph and the top end only care about cash in their pocket and Buffalo won't get a team that gives back until that changes
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Great piece... I agree that Buffalo is one of the prime markets for this policy and it should help secure their home in town