Making Buffalo Safe for Cyclists - Sign the Bicycle Lane Request Form
Comments
Leave a commentThe only way Buffalo is going to be become more safe for cyclists is not only based on building more bike lanes and paths but also compelling cyclists to start obeying all traffic laws. I see too many cyclists who run red lights and stop signs, ride against traffic, ride the wrong way down one way streets and the worst safety bugaboo, riding on the sidewalks. It is obvious that bicyclists are among the worst and most persistant law breakers. They are putting themselves at serious risk of injury and death because of their stupidity and spitefulness. You can't blame motorists for everything, the bicyclists have to accept a large amount of the blame. I also blame local authorities for being way too lax on enforcing traffic laws especially with bicyclists.
Well, bike lanes show people where they are supposed to ride and in which direction. They get them off of the sidewalks. So adding bike lanes will help make things more orderly in that respect.
I agree that both drivers and bicycle riders should follow the rules of traffic, so that things are predictable and orderly, but really, let's be honest about which group is killing and maiming people (hint, it's not the bicycle riders). If it wasn't for the automobile's high speed and enormous destructive potential, there would be no need for traffic rules.
Thank you for pointing out that simple truth, JSmith: bicyclists are not harming drivers. The car culture is so deeply embedded in Buffalo, undoing the mentality is going to take some serious work (progress is being made, for sure).
As a side note, I really hate seeing riders without helmets. That is just plain unnecessary, and dumb.
(Another little side note on how impressive the Cornell exchange program is in Buffalo--I believe about 20 driven, intelligent individuals are spending time this summer working for local non-profits. What a win-win experience.)
I don't really want to get started on bicycle helmets, because it is a personal individual choice and because I feel that a focus on helmets distracts from the real issues involved in traffic safety. But I will point out two facts for people to mull over and come to their own decisions.
1) Automobile drivers and pedestrians suffer severe head injuries at a similar rate to bicycle riders, so if helmets are warranted for bicycle riders, they should also be encouraged for car drivers and pedestrians.
2) There is no country in the world where an increase in helmet usage has been accompanied by a decrease in severe head injury rate. If bicycle helmets provide significant protection against head injury, we should expect to see a substantial decrease in head injury rates in the countries that have achieved high helmet usage rates through mandatory helmet laws. That is simply not the case anywhere in the world.
See http://cyclehelmets.org/ for a very extensive and detailed analysis of the topic, and make your own informed decision.
i am all for helmets for drivers.
or just look here and see the chilling death rate for helmet-free cyclists for yourself:
So out of the roughly, let's say, 7.2 MILLION people who ride a bike at least once a year, 792 died. I would go with those odds and not wear a helmet. If I die without a helmet, I'll die the same way most of the people WITH a helmet would of died from....Getting hit by a god damn 3,000 pound piece of metal. Keep the unnecessary Scared Mommy laws coming.
I have no idea why you are on a crusade to convince people to not wear a helmet when riding a bicycle (see comments in a previous thread). There is no evidence whatsoever that having a bare head is safer than wearing a helmet, and there is plenty of evidence that wearing a helmet does help save lives, or lessen injuries. The studies that you cite are merely correlation studies, which really aren't helpful.
Furthermore, it is the law for all children to wear a helmet, so it isn't a matter of personal choice. And if you insist that it is a personal choice for your wear one, then it should be a personal choice for me and my insurance company to not pay for the extra costs of lifetime medical assistance for massive brain damage that occurs to bicyclists who could have avoided it with a helmet. IOW, you want
Since that last thread, I spoke with a close friend who is a physical therapist about this, and he got livid that anyone would argue that helmets are a "personal choice." As an daily commuter on a bike and as a therapist who has to deal with a wide range of people who suffered from accidents of all sorts, he is beside himself why anyone would believe such nonsense.
I have no idea why you are on a crusade to convince people to not wear a helmet when riding a bicycle (see comments in a previous thread).
No, I'm actually not trying to convince anyone of what, if anything, to wear on their head when bicycling. It really doesn't matter to me whether someone chooses to wear a helmet, elbow pads, a mouth guard, a jock strap, or whatever when bicycling. Whatever makes you comfortable. I do however object to people using words like "dumb", "idiot", "asshat", or "organ donor" to describe people who made a different personal choice than their own.
There is no evidence whatsoever that having a bare head is safer than wearing a helmet
Possibly true, but also true when walking or driving. Ask your physical therapist friend how he feels about drivers or pedestrians who suffer a head injury. Is he livid because they weren't wearing a helmet? Do you want your insurance company to refuse treatment to those people?
and there is plenty of evidence that wearing a helmet does help save lives
Quite possibly not true, when you look at the actual evidence, which is why I object to the inflammatory language and the irrational hyperbole that ends up convincing people that riding a bicycle is far more dangerous than it really is. And of course, the negative health impact from not bicycling is far greater than any risk avoided.
Talking about helmet safety wouldn't be such a deal but the fact is that the news will ALWAYS mention if the rider killed after being hit by was/wasn't wearing a helmet. It's as if they are justifying their death because they did not have a helmet on.
That's the problem with people not understanding helmet safety and using it as justification for deaths when ran over by a car
So then it would make more sense to obey the laws as well or better than motorists? It is not the person driving the car that is taking the greater risk. When I ride I take back roads when ever possible and stay off the main drags. I will also stop at lights. I admit to slowing and going through stop signs but I know I am the one taking the risk.
It's a complete crap argument that cyclists need to start obeying laws for them to gain respect. Auto drivers break laws constantly. When I cycle home I usually count laws being broken. On my 6 mile commute I will usually witness 2-3 people running red lights well after they change. Countless people will be speeding and no one comes to a complete stop at stop signs. I see people texting and talking on the phone and just straight up driving dangerously. So yeah, I'll stop running red lights when you do.
Distracted Driving.
We are doomed to hear more and more of this upcoming epidemic.
And it's not just the teenagers, it's everyone.
Too often WE see a 40-something constantly looking down at thier "Lap" while doing 40 in a minivan.
Nobody is that important.
These habits are exponentially more hazardous than the current fines suggest.
which is why i wear a helmet. why should i let a texting dimwit kill or maim me?
I love riding my bike, and I would love to see more bike lanes. I would ride more places if it was safer.
But if cyclists want to be taken seriously then they need to follow all the road rules. Today most of them don't. It doesn't matter that it's the car that causes the actual injury, if a cyclist cuts across traffic against a signal, then he was at fault and caused his own injury. Most cyclists assume that stops signs, red lights and other rules just don't apply to them. These aren't exceptions, they're the norm. That has to stop.
I know cyclists get stubbornly opposed to accepting responsibility, or anything that might cut into their "freedom" of riding, but responsibility works 2 ways.
And no, I'm not saying Cars aren't responsible too. They are. And most deaths are totally the fault of the car driver. But deaths would be 1000 times worse if it weren't for car drivers avoiding the cyclists who ride all over the road.
Most drivers also assume traffic controls don't apply to them. These aren't exceptions, they're the norm. That has to stop.
That isn't really true. There are extremes on both sides, but for cars the violations are usually more subtle. The two big ones are cars that slow down but don't fully stop at stop signs, and cars that speed. On the other hand, cyclists almost never even attempt to slow down at a stop sign. Also cars are policed... they are handed tickets every day for violations, even if they are "safe". Cyclists on the other hand do pretty much whatever they want and have no real penalties (until there's an accident...)
There's nothing stopping BPD from stopping cyclist and issuing tickets asides from their own apathy. Cars rolling stop signs is also the least of their transgressions. You want to see cyclists as the problem but really it's cars
northbuf, I'm not a cop but I'd bet it's considered more of a waste of time to ticket a bike rider - and much easier for a bike rider to just not pay and ignore a ticket even when written. In short, more of a waste of time compared to ticketing a car driver.
The reason is car drivers are required to carry a license and show it to police when pulled over. If a ticket isn't paid, the license or registration is a way to have consequences.
Why couldn't a bike rider just say they have no ID with them (it isn't as though the cop will bring them downtown for a stop sign violation), then give the cop a slightly fake name or fake address, then toss away the ticket?
Not that I'm suggesting anyone try that of course - you guys should wear your helmets, stop at stop signs, and pay your tickets if you get any, lol - but just sayin…
Northbuf is clearly biased to bikers. He is pulling these "I see cars killing handicap children 7 times a day!" kind of stats out to prove cars break more laws than bikes. Sure they do, because there are 100 times more of them.
I would hazard to guess that a car slowing down is proportional to a bike going full speed through a stop sign. 5mph is 5mph.
Also, you mention that speeding is one of two common violations for cars. For cyclists and pedestrians this is not a good thing.
Remember kinetic energy = 1/2 mass x velocity ^2.
So... the faster a car goes the more dangerous [lethal] it becomes:
At 20mph the vehicle-pedestrian crash fatality rate is 5%
... 30mph ... 45%
... 40mph ... 85%
Combine this with distracted driving and it's literally a lethal combination. No matter how bad a cyclist is on the road, why are the odds that they're going to cause a fatality?
Bike lanes and signs will be good for everyone. Both sides need to be more educated and aware of each other.
Go to Colorado, Boulder in particular has it clear that bikes and cars share the road. It should be obvious to both cars and bikes what the rules are and who has what right of ways. I do both in Buffalo and see both sides, the way i see it is too many misunderstand the rules of the road. I've seen plenty of bicyclists do stupid things mentioned, as well as auto drivers not have a clue that bikes have a right to the road, and have been yelled at many times to get on the sidewalk and out of the road!
Not up onto the sidewalk? The picture reminds me that heading west on Porter towards the water that cyclists are supposed to go up onto the sidewalk after their lane ends no? Why does it end anyway? It shouldn't, everything goes so smoothly with everyone having their lane until after Niagara St.
It's also annoying when you try to be respectful on a street like North and you wait and wait to pass a cyclists then when you finally manage to get around them you hit a red and there they go zooming up the right of you and or through the light and you have to do it all over again. Curses!!
Not every road needs a bike lane, but honestly there should be more. It's better for everyone.
I am currently in Madison, WI for a conference and cannot get over how many bicyclists there are here. They understand bicycle usage. Their lanes are divided with concrete, others by a line, and most by the simple rules of the road. There are also just as many moped riders. (most of whom as I would consider of the "preppy" type) Buffalo needs to use a similar bicycle outline on its streets. Its so popular here that mostly everyone, follows the rules of the road, on both ends. I had three bicycles stop for me when I was in a crosswalk, as did cars. I am very impressed with this small city's transportation system; Very easy to use bus lines, many biking options and moped usage. But it starts with the city realizing that there are other transportation options, and they need to help regulate them. Bikers need a "lane." Bikers need places to put their bikes, Mopeder's should be able to park on the sidewalk just like bikes. Once its visual for drivers to see, they most likely will be more aware of riders on the sides of the road. People will probably think twice before crossing over two white lines, where now there are none. I hope the best for this. Buffalo needs to do better with their bike system....Also we need to have the "rent a bike" Ive seen them in Denver and Madison. What a great way to go places when you dont have a bike. (ie. travelers)
@bufwego - Buffalo is in the first phases of inaugurating a bike share system, starting at UB but supposedly eventually encompassing the whole city: http://www.facebook.com/BfloBikeShare . Buffalo will be the first city east of California to use the Social Bikes (SoBi) system, so it's a bit of an experiment, but it could be pretty cool.
If bikers don't follow traffic laws, it makes car drivers wary and worried about hitting someday and so it makes them slow down and watch where they're going. Right now anything that makes car drivers slow down and be aware is helping both bikers and pedestrians (and other cars), so ironically bikers that don't follow the law are good for society. (I do, as a side note, always follow traffic laws on a bike, for self-preservation, but that's a personal choice.)
Very strange reasoning. Ultimately it is the cyclist that will loose. All have to be aware and all have to follow the laws. A car may not be able to stop in time if some nut runs a light or stop sign.
I almost hit a cyclist a couple weeks ago at Allen and Elmwood. I had the green light on Allen, traffic was stopped on Elmwood. As I made a right onto Elmwood this girl came up to the red light, made a left in front of the car stopped for the light and cut in front on me (who had the green), then continued down Allen St against the traffic. She was lucky I saw her speed and had a inkling she was dumb.
How about we treat cars and bikes equally? I'm OK if a cyclist doesn't obey all rules and wants to SAFELY run a red or a stop sign, but I am so tired or driving down a street, esp. a one way street, only to be faced with a cyclist coming towards me - against the traffic. This isnt' a random occurence or only a few cyclists. I enounter this nearly every day and honestly I don't drive far at all.
Or how about the cyclists who feel the need to ride on the sidewalk - especially through the busiest parts of Elmwood? That's a serious danger to pedestrians that also happens constantly.
I honestly think that a large part of the problem on both sides is ignorance, not disregard. I don't even care if the cyclists are ticketed - but if the police dept would do a one week blitz of stopping and informing cyclists of these major infractions I think it would go a long way towards educating cyclists and gaining them some respect.
And while I'm on the subject of cyclists and traffic - as a frequent runner at Delaware Park - could somebody please tell the cyclists that the "Sharrow" means that they are to be riding with the car traffic in the direction indicated by the arrow part of the sharrow? I'm tired of trying to dodge the cyclists coming at me in the pedestrian lane. A pedestrian-cyclist accident is no fun either. And apparently we need more signs at the entrances to indicate to cars that the vehicular traffic is one-way because I frequently encounter cars driving the wrong way through the park. Oh, and tell nearly all the cars to SLOW DOWN because the speed limit is only 15.
OK. Done for now.
Two quick stories about bike riders....
1.
Me and my GF were making a left onto Depew and we came to a stop sign. We looked over to the right and there was a guy on a bike about 5-10 seconds away from the stop sign. So thinking that he's going to stop we drive on through. Little did we know, he never stopped and when we turned he was right on my tail, and we pulled over to look at a house for sale and he rode past giving us a dirty look for about 20 feet. After we pulled away from the curb we saw this guy ride all the way down Depew blowing each stop sign, then making an illegal left on red at Parkside and Depew and causing a car to stop and beep its horn.
2.
My buddy's driving down by the Hockey arena drinking a diet Coke in the summer time and he passes a group of 20 something hipsters who yell at him, "hey look he's drinking a beer!" So what did the hipsters do? They spit on his car and told him to pull over so they could kick his ass, keep im mind my buddies 6'4" 310 pounds and can duck a basketball. But back to the story. So after they spit on his car he shows him that it's only a Diet Coke and the one kid rids up to his door and says, "hey guys dont worry it's only a coke." So now all of a sudden their best friends and the kid tries giving my buddy a pound doggie through the passenger window and scrapes the side of his car.
So to make a long post short, I hate bycycle riders. If you guys want bike lanes, follow the laws, wear a helment and pay fees to register you bikes. And if you break any of the laws you should get a ticket.
Two quick stories about drivers:
1. Driving down Hertel I've been passed both on the median and on the right shoulder be cars deciding they can't be bothered to wait like everyone else. Not only are they passing aggressively on a single land road, they are speeding excessively. Let's keep in mind that the vehicle-pedestrian crash fatality rate rises exponentially as vehicle speed rises.
2. Riding my bike [legally] down Voorhees, and stopping at every stop sign, I've been cut off by a driver who decided to turn right in front of me as I stopped [legally] at a stop sign because he couldn't wait the extra five seconds for his turn.
Long story short, I hate automobile drivers. If you want to be allowed on the road, follow the laws and stop acting like you are god gift to roads, and if you break any laws you should get a ticket.
"...Riding my bike [legally] down Voorhees, and stopping at every stop sign..."
um, yeah... that never happens. If YOU stop at every stop sign while riding your bike then I send you major Kudos, because you're part of an elite club of 1% of cyclists that actually do that.
just one more.
every cyclist i know who bikes for transportation instead of pleasure, myself included, has suffered significant injuries from driver inattention or aggression. i'm talking broken bones, stitches, time lost from work. not even mentioning fatalities.
the most typical injury is the door prize: you are riding to the right as required by law, only to have someone in a parked car open his door on you. this can cause anything from little finger fractures to pelvic fractures.
i know a cyclist who was passing though an intersection. a driver ran a red light or stop sign and t-boned him. he bounced off the car hood and landed on the pavement. somehow miraculously escaped broken bones but had long-lasting soft tissue damage.
sure, cyclists need to be vigilant, predictable, and follow traffic law. but drivers need to be even more so. a moment glancing at your smartphone can kill me.
in the end, it doesn't matter if the vase hits the brick or the brick hits the vase. the vase loses.
Seems like a apropos time to post this link:
Stay out of the "door zone", ride predictably and visibly, and make eye-contact with drivers before crossing in front of them at intersections.
yes, i learned to avoid the door zone and -knock on wood- have narrowly averted more door prizes than i can count. as a result, i get yelled at drivers for being in "their" lane. i get to choose between injury or abuse.
if drivers had to face this choice from vehicles much larger and deadlier than themselves (like double-hauling 18 wheelers), there'd be a congressional investigation.
Seriously, take the whole lane in those situations - you are entitled to it when there is not enough room for a car and a bicycle to safely share the lane. Cars can go around you or wait.
You're probably right about your second paragraph!
300miles: I find that most bike lanes are wide enough that the left edge of them is far enough away from the parked cars. Some modern bike lanes (in other cities) have a striped buffer zone between the bike lane and the parking lane, and some cities are installing protected bicycle lanes that run between the parked cars and the curb.
Aren't most bike lanes in the door zone though?
I love bike lanes, but also get a little concerned about competing space needs. Some people want wider sidewalks, wider tree wells, bike lanes, bike buffers, curb bulb-outs, rain swails, etc. On some roads like Main St or Hertel there's room to add some or all of those things. But on most roads there may only be room for one of those features.
Yes, it is always a delicate balancing act. Of course, since the 1930s on, the balance has been so overwhelmingly in favor of the convenience of automobile drivers.
Riddle me this, Batman:
Every round-about on Richmond has stop signs... except Symphony Circle. Why? That circle is dangerous for anyone who goes near it, even cars. Did the city run out of stop signs? Why the other circles but not this one?
Meanwhile, in the promised land of bicycling.
Commuters Pedal to Work on Their Very Own Superhighway
The cycle superhighway, which opened in April, is the first of 26 routes scheduled to be built to encourage more people to commute to and from Copenhagen by bicycle. More bike path than the Interstate its name suggests, it is the brainchild of city planners who were looking for ways to increase bicycle use in a place where half of the residents already bike to work or to school every day.
^ in a way, NYS is working on that with the statewide erie canal bike path
Good luck on this initiative!
Off-subject but in the realm of get-about alternatives ─ awareness has to be raised regarding drivers being oblivious or disregarding of pedestrians.
Having the good fortune of living within walking distance of work, I have had first-hand experiences of drivers turning as I'm entering the crosswalk or not even seeing me in the middle of the crosswalk because their only focus is looking for cars.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




Thank you for posting this. The need for improved bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, and to tame the automobile, is sorely evident. This seems to be shaping up to be a banner year for bicyclist fatalities and severe injuries in WNY. Just yesterday an elderly man was struck and killed by an apparently distracted woman driving on Transit Road in Olcott. And now today another man was struck by a driver in Wheatfield and flown to ECMC with critical injuries. It feels like every other day there is an article in the Buffalo News about another pedestrian or bicycle rider killed or critically injured by someone driving a car.
Please take this petition to the Dept of Public Works and put some real pressure on them to accelerate the good but slow progress that has been made recently. And don't forget to remind them that bike lanes and other complete streets elements calm traffic and improve safety for drivers as well! Everyone benefits from these improvements, not just bicyclists and pedestrians.