City July 13, 2012 12:15 PM

Education Advocates Propose Charter Restart Model for Two Buffalo Schools

Education Advocates Propose Charter Restart Model for Two Buffalo Schools

Chameleon Community Schools Project, Inc. and will hold a public meeting tomorrow, July 14, to discuss proposals for East High School and Waterfront School including the concept and process for implementing the federally approved school turnaround model - close and restart of a public school as a charter school - for two of the persistently low achieving (PLA) schools in Buffalo:  East High School and Waterfront School.  The purpose of this model is to provide a much needed option for a quality education to the 1,500 at-risk students in these schools.

This proposal is the product of a Chameleon Community Schools Project, Inc., a local  not-for-profit charter management organization, in conjunction with a diverse and passionate group of parents, educators, education and child advocates, business and community leaders.

The community is invited to be involved and may do so by visiting http://eastwaterfront.blog.com

WHEN:  Saturday, July 14 at 10:00 AM

WHERE:  Sherman L. Walker Community Center, 608 William Street, Buffalo, NY  14206  (Ample parking in back)

WHO:  Chameleon Community Schools Project, Inc. and community members

 

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

So let me get this straight. These 1500 students are being taught by cut rate teachers at the moment and need a charter school to give them a better teachers and education? How about this. Pay attention in class now and have parents get involved. Sounds to me like just shifting of blame.

Score: 2 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Saying "just get the parents involved" is a lazy way of thinking, and particularly unrealistic. If that's all it takes, *why hasn't it happened yet?*

Smaller class sizes, teachers with "better" degrees, and more money all offer no statistical improvement in students.

The only answer that does is school choice. Charters are a poor substitute in that regard, but better something than nothing.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes, parent involvement is paramount and, sadly, we have breed a culture of “parents” who think the school system is supposed to babysit as well as attempt to teach in an environment that is probably the equivalent of a room full of screaming banshees.

Might also explain why, in the 21st century, Buffalo has a graduation rate of 40%

Oh, but I bet they can all text really well because no one seems to know how to spell or, for that matter, use spell check.

Syntax is not a tax on liquor and cigarettes….

replied to Jesse
Score: 6 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What's lazy about that? If parents made their kids study for two hours a night, check the homework and taught respect maybe our graduation rate would be higher. Parents are to blame for much of this.

replied to Jesse
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That is great!

However you are failing to realize that most of these kids are living in an environment of cyclical poverty.

The culture of cyclical poverty is generally that of mistrust and anti-intellectualism (regardless of race).

If we want better performing schools we have to break the cycle of poverty. Education is just a single piece of the puzzle. However its no good if there is no support at home or among ones peers to achieve a better education.

Charter schools help a little, but at the end of the day they are not fixing the deep rooted problems; they are just shuffling the students around.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Then just home school them.
Day 1- Food stamps
Day 2- Medicare
Day 3- How to get free taxi to emergency room
Day 4- More babies = more food stamps
Day 5- Free heat
Saturday- Graduation

Poverty has nothing to do with parental control. Good parents want good things for their children.

replied to No_Illusions
Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly! Good parents want good things for their children.

However, living in poverty does not usually make people good parents, especially when their own parents were living in a state of poverty. This is the problem.

Being poor in itself does not make you a bad parent. Growing up in an environment of poverty however likely will.

And yes chide food stamps and welfare all you want. Our system is horrible that traps people in poverty and punishes them for making more money. We need a system that facilitates upwards mobility and allows people to actually escape. Such a system will actually save us money in the long run, as less and less people will rely on government subsidies.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agree, I have made this argument many times, we need to reward work and pay all productive workers a fair and reasonable wage. We have allowed certain business interests to drive down wages resulting in the need for government programs to make up the difference. Time for business to get off the taxpayers back and stop expecting us to pay for their employees health care and subsidizing rent and food expenses. If we had something even approaching a living wage many government programs would be uneccessary.

replied to No_Illusions
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Was the parent trigger law used to initiative these proposals? Is there parent and student buy-in?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

bps - according to BN reporting on this, the trigger is insistence from NYS (perhaps originating from D.C., via Obama admin Race To The Top rules?) that 1 of 3 big changes must happen very soon at these schools because they've been categorized 'persistently low achieving'.

http://www.buffalonews.com/city/schools/article928363.ece
"Some of the founders of Tapestry Charter School are spearheading an effort to turn East High School and Waterfront School, both deemed persistently low achieving, into charter schools - a proposal that seems to have riled district administrators and School Board members.
… In May, the state approved a district plan for East that involves hiring Johns Hopkins University to run the school, starting in September 2012. That plan is contingent upon the district submitting by Sunday a teacher evaluation plan for 2012-13 that the union agrees to - something that has not yet happened. Johns Hopkins has said it is not prepared to step in to run the school for September, but would consider an altered schedule; it's not clear whether the state would agree to that.
The state in May rejected the district's plan for improving Waterfront. That plan involved hiring Canisius College to run the school. State officials have given the district until Dec. 31 to submit an acceptable plan for Waterfront, or the school's registration will be revoked.
"… Waterfront Principal David Hills points out that his school must select one of three available models: reopen as a charter, hire an outside group to run it, or replace half the teachers. …"

If the BPS board successfully chooses either of the latter two possibilities (hires an outside group - which didn't get NYS approval for their Canisius plan and fell apart for their Hopkins plan due to timing, or replaces half the teachers), then the charter option won't happen.
But if neither of those first two happen, then this org is volunteering to be the charter operator for both schools.
More info at that BN link.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Just curious, but do you know why the state rejected the Canisius plan?

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

salt - good question about reasons.

Evidently, NY state bureaucrats didn't feel like making that info easy for the public to know. Seems like how they also wouldn't publicly say exactly why teacher eval plans were unacceptable if they had any student attendance wording, until after a while all they decided those weren't unacceptable.

Looking via google I don't see where any explanation was revealed about exactly which regulations the Waterfront-Canisius plan didn't meet. Here's two reportings of the rejection, neither with a reason from NYS beyond because-I-said-so.

http://www.buffalonews.com/city/schools/article841365.ece
"... This week, King rejected plans to hire Canisius College to run Waterfront Elementary. He gave the district until Dec. 31 to submit an approvable plan to the state for Waterfront.
If that doesn't happen, he said, he will recommend to the Board of Regents that Waterfront's registration be revoked.
...
Waterfront Principal David Hills said the state's rejection of the plan came as a surprise. So far, state Education Department officials have not released details on why they rejected the plan.
..."

http://blogs.buffalonews.com/school_zone/2012/05/kings-letter-.html
"Read King's letter approving 2012-13 plans, tying money to teacher evals
Here is the full text of the letter the commissioner sent to the district:
May 3, 2012
Ms. Amber Dixon, Interim Superintendent
712 City Hall
Buffalo, New York 14202
Dear Ms. Dixon:
... I have determined that six of the seven school applications have met the required minimum quality standards for funding. These applications may be approved for SIG funding, provided the conditions identified below are met by the dates specified. If the conditions are met, the award decisions and preliminary funding amounts will be:
- District plan to support implementation: Approval Pending; $1,400,000
- Buffalo Elementary School of Technology #6: Restart; Approval Pending; $1,779,483
- Waterfront Elementary #95: Restart; Disapprove
- Lafayette High School #204: Restart; Approval Pending; $1,779,871
- East High School #307: Restart; Approval Pending; $1,779,871
- Bilingual Center #33: Turnaround; Approval Pending; $1,800,000
- Futures Academy #37: Turnaround; Approval Pending; $1,541,077
- Dr. Charles R. Drew Science Magnet #59: Turnaround; Approval Pending; $1,800,000
...
For the Waterfront Elementary #95, BPS has until December 31, 2012 to submit an approvable School Under Registration Review (SURR) plan consistent with Commissioner’s regulations. If this plan is not submitted by this deadline, or if the plan submitted is not approvable, I will recommend revocation of the school’s registration to the Board of Regents.
... Sincerely,
John B. King, Jr.
Commissioner"

Maybe somebody else who reads this might know?

replied to saltecks
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The state spent a billion dollars renovating BPS buildings. Too many schools renovated for a declining enrollment migrating to among other choices, charters. The BOE can take umbrage but the state wants results from spending millions renovating schools, otherwise they look foolish. The BOE doesn’t seem to have coherent plans. The state can make the call here. PLA schools either perform or in theory get closed down, same goes for charters. Many kids in these schools are NOT failing. But where do you place these kids? The parents and students wanting to learn see hope in new buildings. But they are constantly reminded that they attend failing schools. Something dramatic needs to happen or millions will have been wasted. Pilot Schools in Boston are public schools converted to charters, they are also union shops. Could this have been possible in Buffalo? It probably isn’t even a topic of discussion. The state probably isn't going to allow the closing of newly renovated school buildings and neither should parents and taxpayers.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why doesn't Buffalo Rising have a single mention of the superintendent turmoil in the Buffalo school system?

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is commenting to myself considered talking to myself here at BR?

Asked differently, and irregardless of what sort of public schools existed in the past or will exist in the future, and since the largest part of Buffalo's ever rising up would need to be through the school system, why isn't BR on top of this most important superindendent issue, especially since BR and its reps most certainly had no problem taking the plunge in the past? 07l412 1014am

replied to Crisa
Score: -2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While there may be many problems in the Buffalo Public Schools, there are also many great things going on in the schools. If Buffalo Rising is going to be involved in the education conversation, why go against the theme of the blog, and always promote the agenda of those who argue that public schooling is failing and therefore should be privatized? Not necessarily with this post, but most of the education postings seem to come from the pro charter school movement.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First, charters aren't 'privatized'. They're publicly funded schools open to city students for free. Having lotteries doesn't make them not public, just like lotteries or admission tests for some schools run by the BOE administrating using BTF-contracted work rules don't make those not public either.

As to why BR doesn't have more (or any?) anti-charter posts as you're asking for, is an answer possibly as simple as not many (or nobody?) on your side making the effort to write articles and submit them to BR requesting publication?

Your complaint might have some merit if your side has really done that and BR refused to publish. It would still be their right to publish only one side, of course, but it's very different if your side isn't even submitting anything to them.

replied to BuffaloBrooklyn
Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Technically, for some legal purposes, charter schools are considered "private." It's complex- they're neither fully "public," nor "private." Some are run by private, for-profit companies, using public dollars. Some don't provide transportation, as is provided to traditional school students, making attendance at those schools more difficult for kids not in the area.

I am neither pro nor anti-charter - I think they raise very complex issues, that there are no easy answers to. My biggest concern is the funding implications of charter schools - everyone has fixed costs that need to be divided among students. Also, charter school funding formulas don't allow for enough money to educate ELL and special needs students. I'm also concerned that because the charter school lotteries are run differently than the BPS lottery, more resourced, parent-involved kids end up in the charter schools, leaving the traditional schools with a higher percentage of uninvolved parents.

It's tricky business, there are no easy answers to urban education reform.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

bps - although some charters are operated by private non-profit orgs instead of the BPS central administration, they're all still public schools in the ways of public funding by tax money, public access for student enrollment, and very heavy public regulation (some might argue too much, or not enough, etc) by public governmental agency the NY state DOE.

Isn't it similar to how some public parks are operated by the private non-profit org Olmsted Conservancy instead of City Hall - but funded using tax $, fully accessible to public park users, and regulated by the city govt (including laws and the contract it negotiated with Olmsted) - are still considered public parks?
I've never heard anyone try to claim Delaware or South Park are no longer fully public parks.

(btw, about transportation - if I'm not mistaken, it isn't the charters who oppose public funding for their students to have that - it's anti-charter forces who have opposed that, and it gives them another thing to condemn charters about. As I see it, publicly funded transportation to/from school should be a separate budget item allocated by NYS available equally to any students regardless of charter or non-charter - just like equal availability for school lunches, etc)

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Under New York State charter school law, charter schools are called "nonpublic schools" for a number of legal purposes, including, but not limited to:

-local zoning, land use, & building code compliance
-how the school provides special education services
-transportation

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

bps - again, for transportation, the way charters are treated differently by NYS looks to me is in a way that harms charters & families who might like to enroll their kids in them. If anyone is implying charters are to blame for not being provided equitable public funding for transportation (equitable with non-charter traditional public schools) it would sounds like blaming the victims. Transportation to-from schools should be equal regardless if the school is independently run or is run by the BPS central admin & the BTF, but it's Albany who won't require it, not the charters.

I agree it's an interesting point you made about NYS govt sometimes using the label 'nonpublic' (instead of nontraditional, or just referring to them as charters).

However, it using that word might say more about NYS govt and who influences it, more than is says about charters - considering the diverse groups who directly say as I did that charters are public schools.
For fun I just took a look and the latter includes - in additiion to me of course - Obama's federal DOE, the NY City DOE, dictionary.com, TheFreeDictionary.com, the National Science Foundation, and of all people the NEA (largest teachers union in the U.S., perhaps not as extremist in being anti-charter the ones in NY state). Hardly a right wing bunch.

Dictionary.com http://dictionary.com/browse/charter+school
"charter school 
noun. an autonomous public school created by a contract between a sponsor, as a local school district or corporation, and an organizer, as a group of teachers or a community group, often with a curriculum or focus that is not traditional. ..."

TheFreeDictionary.com http://www.thefreedictionary.com/charter+school
"charter school
n. A public school operated independently of the local school board, often with a curriculum and educational philosophy different from the other schools in the system."

U.S. federal Dept of Education (Obama admin)
http://www2.ed.gov/parents/schools/choice/definitions.html#cs
"Charter schools are public schools that operate with freedom from many of the local and state regulations that apply to traditional public schools. ..."

NY City's Dept of Education
http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/0452A0FF-2FAF-425F-B893-6F903CAA99CD/0/CharterWebsiteFAQsFinal.pdf
"Q. What is a charter school?
A. A charter school is an independent and autonomous public school. ..."

the National Science Foundation http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c1/c1s.htm#sb2
"Charter schools are public schools that provide elementary or secondary education to students under a specific charter granted by the state legislature or other …"

and the nation's largest teachers union, the NEA http://www.nea.org/home/16332.htm
"Definition
Charter schools are publicly funded elementary or secondary schools that have been freed from some of the rules, regulations, and statutes that apply to other public schools, in exchange for some type of accountability for producing certain results, which are set forth in each charter school's charter. ..."

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"turnaround, parental buy-in, school choice, charter school"- just the latest shibboleths and buzzwords. anyone remember "schools of excellence, focus schools, model schools,new frontiers in education,higher horizons"? all failed and gone. ditto for the magic personae- bill bennett (along with his book,"what works". apparently it didn't.), joe clark(and his bat), rod paige(the texas miracle), michelle rhee (it's the tenure,stupid).
until we face up to the systemic failure of educational apartheid and, more generally, societal apartheid, expect no fixes.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No Illusions and jhorn nailed it, until we address the poverty that undermines our society (and schools) there will be only incremental progress with little hope of real impact.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Poverty undermines society and thats why our nation allow immigration of more and more poor who will vote liberal and democratic and statistics show most will never make more than their parents (ie if your born poor then you will live your life poor).

The only way to stop the poor from being poor is to reduce immigration and push the hiring of the poor even if it means reducing social benefits. There is no social mobility on disability or welfare.

But this is another failure of public schools, admitting that less buracracy, less supervision from the public school board, less public school unions and teachers that have more ability to teach and discipline behavior as well as knowledge (which is done in private / parochial / charter schools but not the liberal communist type educational model in our public schools).

replied to Black Rock Lifer
Score: -7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Immigration has nothing(or very little) to do with the state of poverty in Buffalo.

Yes there are poor immigrants in Buffalo, but they are dwarfed by the number of families who have lived in Buffalo for generations in a continuing cycle of poverty.

Buffalo is not Los Angeles. You cannot peg our problems on immigrants.


In fact Buffalo might be better off it did attract thousands of immigrants every year. Remember the entire country was built on the backs of largely impoverish immigrants.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Stop with the poverty talk...even poor kids' families want want whats best and strive to get ahead. What about the kids not failing? Focus on the facts...the state has spent a billion dollars renovating schools in buffalo. How are we going to make them work? A group is stepping up to try, BOE refuses and what? The state will close these schools down and then what is left behind? Stop talking about failing and talk about ideas that may work. Does anyone on this blog give a sh#t? or is it more fun to bitch?
The state spent a billion dollars renovating schools. Too many schools renovated for a declining enrollment migrating to among other choices, charters. The state should want results from spending millions renovating schools. The BOE doesn’t seem to have coherent plans. The state can make the call. PLA schools either perform or get closed down, same goes for charters. Many kids in PLA schools are NOT failing. The parents and students wanting to learn see hope in new buildings but are constantly reminded they attend failing schools. Something needs to happen or millions will have been wasted. Pilot Schools in Boston are public charter schools, they are also union shops. Could this have been possible in Buffalo? Is it even a topic of discussion? The state shouldn’t and won’t allow the closing of multi-million dollar renovated schools and neither should parents and taxpayers.

Score: 0 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One of the big issues with charter schools, from the Buffalo Board of Education's end, has been the method of funding. The objection is reasonable and should be corrected.

That is, charter schools should be fully funded, separately, from the Buffalo public school system.

Currently, a portion of the money allocated for each charter school student remains in the system and some services are also paid by them.

ladyinwhite ─ your smug Day 1 through Day 5 comments are insulting and ill-considered. If the economic downturn continues, who knows who might need food stamps or other assistance. Get the picture?

Home schooling??? (Please! A substantial number of parents, low income and middle income, are unable to help their children with math, alone. Also, that would probably fall mostly in the realm of stay-at-home or possibly working from home parents.)

Parent involvement is essential but weight must also be given to State and Federal mandates that are continuously mounting.

The September to June school year hasn't changed over the years but the required credits (from 16 credits years ago) to the current 21 credits in that same period is a big factor. Also, increasing Regents courses for graduation.

Re: "good parents want good things for their children"
I'm certain you would find very few parents who want bad things for their children.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Assuming that the cited 40% graduation rate is correct, what does that say about the parents? Something to consider!
The jury is in on charter schools; they do not perform any better than non-charters. Of course, there are exceptions all over the country, but they are rare.
Anyone with basic computer skills can research any public school in this country. The two greatest factors influencing student performance are the educational levels of the parents and their degree of affluence. It is almost universal in American schools. No mystery here and no magic bullets- not even charters.

It is all really quite simple: public school performance reflect the communities and the populations which they serve.

GreatSchools.com has it all!

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>If we want better performing schools we have to break the cycle of poverty.

This is the “tyranny of low expectations.” The assumption is that poor children face too many challenges to learn. This bogus assumption continues by saying there is little hope that school can make any difference to their future unless the problem of poverty can first be “solved” which it cannot. This attitude has consigned whole generations of children to the scrap heap.

This comment is sincere, but let's move beyond the teacher's union talking point "we have bad raw material to work with."

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

>public school performance reflect the communities and the populations which they serve.

Compare the performance of our children to other urban areas (not to wealthy suburbs) and you will see we still fare worse.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That other high poverty areas may perform better than BPS might be true. I will have to look in to that. Generally, due to the guidelines outlined under NCLB, povertty is measured by participation in the free and reduced lunch statistics. Like with all groups, there are variations within. Many of them involve complex influences of regional cultures of said poverty.

One factor independent of poverty in this city's case is that the District is "married" to the city government. Most school districts are separate entities. Something to think about as the nuances are not as simple when you look deeper than those manifestations on the surface.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The District has exhausted all its options. These schools must put a turnaround plan in place or they risk being closed. Then what happens to these kids? They get moved to failing district schools. The charter restart model gives these schools the autonomy and accountability they need in order to be successful. With all the families on waitlists for charters, why is this not being considered as a viable option? What teacher wouldn't want to work in a professional environment where they have a real voice? If it's truly about the kids, then when kids' needs are met, the adults win. It's that simple.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And, to continue the education debate...

Follow this article on the Buffalo News

http://www.buffalonews.com/city/schools/article950171.ece

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment