Real Estate July 31, 2012 6:15 PM

City Expects to Select Webster Block Developer in Two Weeks

City Expects to Select Webster Block Developer in Two Weeks

Two teams are vying to develop the City-owned Webster Block at the foot of Main Street.  Ellicott Development and the Sabres organization are proposing mixed-use facilities for the property that is north of First Niagara Center and is across Main Street from Canalside and the inner harbor. 

 

ellwebs3.bmp

Washington @ Scott Street.  Ellicott proposal above, Sabres below.

sabwebn1.bmpEllicott Development is teaming up with Castle Mosey LLC on a $64 million proposal that includes a 140-room hotel, 42 apartments ranging in size from 1,200 to 3,000 sq.ft., 110,250 sq.ft. of office space, 8,600 sq.ft. of retail space and parking for 1,089 cars.  The retail space would be located along Perry and Main streets.   The tower portion of the project would form an 'L' along Scott Street and extend down Washington Street.  A team led by Charles Gorden Architecture designed the project.

Pending selection and approvals, work would start next May and be finished in December 2014.

ellwebs4.bmp

Main and Perry intersection.  Ellicott proposal above, Sabres below.

sabwebn2.bmpThe Sabres organization is proposing 'Harbor Center,' a $123 million complex that would include a 200-room hotel, retail and restaurant space at the corners of Main and Perry and Washington and Scott streets, and a 965 car parking garage.  A two-rink hockey facility and fitness center would be constructed on top of the parking garage, one with seating for up to 2,000 spectators.  The hotel, to be developed and operated by Benderson Development, is proposed for the northwest corner of the site extending along Main Street.  The brick, cast stone, and metal paneled complex would connect to First Niagara Center over Perry Street.  The Sabres are bringing in construction heavyweight Mortenson Construction, Icon Venue Group to coordinate the effort, and Populous (previously HOK Sport, designer of Coca Cola Field) to design the project.

Construction would begin in February and the complex would open in stages with the garage, retail and ice facility opening by September 2014 and the hotel in June 2015.

Both developers are seeking a public subsidy.  The amount and type of subsidy being sought hasn't been released but the Sabres are said to be requesting a larger subsidy than the Paladino team.

A developer is expected to be chosen in two weeks. 

"We're still hoping to be able to meet the August 15th deadline for selection," said Mayor Brown. 

ellwebs1.bmp

Main @ Scott Street.  Ellicott proposal above, Sabres below.

sabwebn3.bmp

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

The renderings look great.

Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Renderings generally do...which I'm sure was your point.

replied to buffdude
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I know this won't happen realistically, but I'd like to see the city reject both for now and issue a new RFP with a 6 month time frame but stipulating that there will be zero public subsidy.

Why should there have to be any? It's a good location, doesn't have any old building needing rehab, doesn't have any pollution cleanup issues…

Maybe a second RFP process would result in improved bids from either Pegula or Paladino which don't assume taxpayer subsidies, or maybe some other developer who didn't submit a plan this time would the next time. Worth a try.

Score: -31 ( 63 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with What. Farm it back out--we can do better (though, of the two, the Sabres would be more suitable). But, more Benderson? Come on.

replied to whatever
Score: -24 ( 44 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed. It would offer the opportunity to create much better designs, too.

replied to whatever
Score: -21 ( 41 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For once I'm not sure I agree with you. Theoretically it's a great location, but the risk reward ratio on a development this size in buffalo is not good. Hell, bass pro was offered $30,000,000 and still said no. I'm assuming other cities like Baltimore and Cleveland also had to subsidize at first?

replied to whatever
Score: 13 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

its' called "business." There is a risk with building anything at all. presumably, the risk of the location is built into the price of the land. If it were a slam dunk, the price should be high -- if the risk is high, then the price should be lower.

replied to Tim
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly, it's called business.

replied to Rand503
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Tim - it's moot anyway because so many of our politicians love giving taxpayer subsidy to private businesses and won't even consider it a negative.

Another reason my suggestion won't happen is it probably wouldn't be legally possible even (if it wanted to, which it doesn't) for City Hall to rule out taxpayer subsidy corp welfare being provided for something at Webster by NY state or Erie County - both of which love to hand out goodies.
I haven't noticed any reporting of from which levels of govt the Pegula plan's subsidy would come or how much. Paladino's presentation at least mentions some specifics (NYS brownfield programs), although it doesn't say if anything else would be demanded too. More public disclosure about subsidies should be made for both proposals - especially Pegula's if nothing has been revealed about its public $ except to say it would be more than for Paladino's.

As for what you said about Bass Pro - It's very common for them to try demanding big public subsidies everywhere they consider. Since the answers is so often 'yes', maybe it would be dumb for them to not try demanding. But I think BP is unusually highly subsidized, and they just weren't a good fit with the activist stuff here - so I don't know how good a general example BP is.

When claims are made that corp welfare public $ is needed for something, it isn't always true. Even all major retail doesn't receive special handout public subsidies (Kohls didn't, etc.). For a non-retail example, recall just before Golisano became Sabres owner, another prospective owner Mark Hamister was demanding big extra public $, saying otherwise the team wasn't viable here. Politicians like Joel Giambra were agreeing with him. Then Golisano came along and said (and proved) what Hamister was demanding isn't truly needed.

Here's a good argument this week from a hotel owner against public $ for hotels
http://news.wbfo.org/post/new-downtown-hotels-relying-subsidies
"...Hart Hotels President David Hart says his firm doesn't seek subsidies and government shouldn't offer tax breaks for hotels.
This is a retail business. We go after the same customers. We go after the same employees. We pay the same for our goods and services. When government decides to pick winners and losers by putting together a policy that gives tax breaks for something that is demand and market driven, that's the wrong use of the taxpayers' dollars. It's wrong, it's absolutely wrong," Hart said. ..."

replied to Tim
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with this. Maybe if they did another RFP we could hear from a prospective developer who wants to build a 61-storey skyscraper on this crown jewel. The odds aren't in favor though. As far as the renderings, I prefer the Sabres proposal. It would give a closer hotel for out of towners for games and create an attraction with the indoor ice rinks.

replied to whatever
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Both look great. I'm not even going to vote, both are winners!

Score: 8 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ellicott's design looks really good. I saw the presentation online (city website), and the architect did a nice job of explaining how the new building will fit into the Canalside project. Had some really nice contextual detailing and pedestrian amenities that the Sabres didn't get anywhere near.

My reservation is with Paladino. He's shown us that he is a real bully. Also, he doesn't have the credentials that the Sabres do as far as being honest, good citizens and getting things done.

Score: 18 ( 28 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You can't be serious.

replied to hamp
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Both projects look great while I prefer the Sabres idea to draw people downtown. The Ellicott rendering looks better IMO. The Sabres rendering looks to be a similar color to the HSBC tower which I think looks dirty. But idk maybe its a rough rendering.

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think what matters is to also consider function. There's no promise that a company will come in to use the office space.
The idea of having two ice rinks, 1 with almost 2000 seats is huge. Anyone that has played travel hockey at least will see the value in the Pegula plan.

Growing up, there used to be these tournaments held in Cleveland every weekend, for teams to visit and play. Hotels would be filled with hockey players every weekend. Pegula has a chance to truly change the area around the arena, making it a regional to national attraction beyond the Sabres alone. It will make Leafs fans jealous.

replied to Tom
Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes totally agree.

replied to Greg
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Those look pretty awesome. I'd be happy with either of them!

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

like the corner entrance and use of brick in the first rendering.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

..both look identical -> a hotel dropped onto a parking garage.

the addition of the rinks in the sabres proposal is interesting but otherwise there is not a huge difference between the two although I would be interested in who has the better sidewalk frontage - retail etc.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Paladinos looks best for that block. The sabres can build their development in any of the numerous full block surface lots toward Ohio st.

I reviewed both reports. Paladinos report was much more robust with real concern to fit into the "historical" vibe of the area.

The office space is very attractive to reinforcing a lunch hour/after work audience.

Regarding the submission of amended bids. New York City did that with the competition for the Math/Engineering bid process. It pissed off some of the universities, but they got a truly amazing project. I don't think buffalo has the goodwill or demand to mess around with developers like that.

Score: 0 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The renderings are superior but I worry about Buffalo being "owned" by a sports team. Arenas don't necessarily bring any economic benefit to cities because the profits are internalized, I don't see how this can be much better. Well it's better than EDC getting it, I suppose.

Score: -10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If it were next to the Bills stadium I would agree with you but the Sabres are a different story. Ralph Wilson continues to suck money out of a losing team and their fans, putting zero back in, including the stadium and property itself.

Pegula on the other hand, has already sank a ton of money into the team, arena and even a little into the property across the street the city owns. That alone gives me a better feeling that he will do right by the community. All I can say about that is I'd hate to see Pegula resent the city because he offers us a development and other goodwill and we end up choosing a project by one of the same typical developers that frankly talks more than he does.

With that said I think there's room and land available nearby for both developments, though I think Pegula's should be chosen because I feel he has the community at large in his best interest, Paladino has his bank account in his best interest. Plus I don't think Pegula is doing this, or needs to do this, to make money. I think he's doing this because he wants to which I feel will leave us with a much better end product as he hopefully won't leave out cost prohibitive ammenities and will build something better for the sake of it.

replied to MEG
Score: 5 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Either one is fine although the ice rinks in Sabres plan seems like it would generate more traffic for the hotel , retail and restaurants. Webster and Donovan, then add the Childrens Museum and Public Market and watch all other private investment line up to fill out the Canalside streets and Cobblestone District.

Score: 14 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Even if the Paladino proposal wins the swim suit competition the Sabres' proposal wins the pageant.

500,000 visitors would seem to trump all. The City ought to make sure that the Sabres proposal is shaped to meet the other criteria.

Score: 13 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

while paladino's looks great, the question we have to ask is - which of these is going to bring outside people and outside dollars to buffalo. One has to imagine that Pegula's thinking in building 2 rinks and a hotel together is to bring in and host hockey tournaments. Anything from Western PA to Southern Ontario would be able to host regional tournaments at Harbor Center. In addition, it be a great sell to try and bring back the World Juniors or Frozen Four again.

Like with Gates Circle and the proposed Vet Hospital - we sometimes have to sacrifice what looks esthetically better for what ultimately brings in more people, more revenue and ultimately keeps more people in buffalo.... of course, this is coming from an ex-pat, what do I know.

Score: 26 ( 26 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First off, the two proposals are nowhere near equal. The Paladino proposal is for 63million, while The Sabres proposal is 123million, almost twice as much. You get what you pay for. Also remember that Ellicott development has said that inclusion of the office component is contingent on market demand at the time of construction. They have been sitting on court street for 5 years now. So whats the chance their end product will turn out to be much smaller then depicted.

Score: 27 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

True, I'd give this to Pegula, he's been nothing but a great ambassador for the city of Buffalo and there's a big difference between 60 and 120 million. Also, the rinks give people from the suburbs a reason to come downtown. It would be a big slap in the face if Pegula doesn't get this.

replied to saltecks
Score: 16 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

THE CITY NEEDS TO PUT THIS PROPERTY OUT TO BID AND SELL IT TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER AND BE DONE WITH IT !!! THE CITY DOESNT DESERVE TO OWN ANY PROPERTY. THEY CANT EVEN TAKE CARE OF THE TREES THEY PUT OUT TO BID THAT WE PAY FOR ! NO SUBSIDIES OR TAX DOLLARS SHOULD BE USED TO HELP WHOEVER BUYS THIS LAND ! ITS OUTRAGIOUS THAT THEY WOULD EVEN ASK FOR MONEY TO DEVELOPE IT ! CORPORATE WELFARE !IM GLAD IM ALMOST OUT OF THIS GHETTO BUFFALO. WONT BE LONG ! IM GOING WHERE THE PUBLIC TRANSPOTATION DOESNT GO !

Score: -32 ( 36 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't let the caps lock hit you on the way out.

replied to warehousedweller
Score: 24 ( 24 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It has been out to bid, these are the two proposals they have, nothing else. Canalside is till in its early stages and like any city requires a little public investment to get it rolling. Private investment will come. i would rather have the city back this diverse concept instead of a single retailer like Bass pro.

replied to warehousedweller
Score: 9 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Is there anything stopping either of the proposals not chosen from being built somewhere in that sea of parking lots just west of the arena? Putting one of these projects over there would bridge the gap between the arena, cobblestone district and the casino.

Well I'm on that area, I'm still hoping someone comes along to put that DL&W terminal to good use. That thing has some really interesting potential.

Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

East.

If you go West of the arena you're in the drink. :-)

replied to rpm40
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Right, i meant East, sorry. You got where I was headed. :)

replied to Jesse
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The residential portion of Palidino's proposal is the game changer for me. If we want it to be a viable district it needs to have residents. His proposal runs the gamut as far as mixed use goes. Hotel, residential, commercial office space, retail. I see the retail and residential as being the most important to the vitality of canal side.

Score: 1 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree 100%. All a hockey rink/hotel is going to do is bring in people from the suburbs who will never leave the building. I much prefer the inclusion of residential and office space to rinks. When have rinks done anything substantial economically for an area? If that was the case, the Pepsi Center wouldn't be all by itself in a field.

replied to Mark_Hitchcock
Score: -2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It looks like the Paladino and Benderson supporters are out in force giving a thumbs down to any suggestion that they should have to fully pay their own way.

But hey, I bet they just HATE government subsidies as un American.

Score: -2 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does anyone really trust Paladino?

Pegula's project would actually bring people into the region, help Canisius, fill a need, and generate some spinoff spending from the area from those vising the rinks, which operate 12 months of the year.

It's also valued twice as much, which means twice as much in property tax.

Pegula has been a man of his word. Paladino, not at all. No question as to which is superior. Pick Pegula and let's get moving.

Score: 16 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The real queation here is apartments vs retail. Pegulas proposal offers twice as much retail and that makes it a winner. Not to mention I trust Pegula over Paladino. Paladino has had his chance, give Pegula a shot.

Score: 10 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think we've seen a lot of organic growth in the downtown area with new residential without the retail component over the last few years. Though we still need much more residential, the retail element that close to all the new residential might be a shot in the arm to entice more people to want to live in the downtown core.

It's time we rewarded the folks who chose downtown with some much needed daily shopping options in walking distance. That in turn I think would fuel the demand and hopefully tip the scales for anyone on the fence of choosing downtown over other options that already have retail nearby, such as the suburbs.

Plus Canalside proper already has residential planned and who's to say they can't add more once things get rolling and the demand is there?

replied to norwood
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed. Residential would make much more sense by the Pasquale. Canal Side should be a recreational attraction concentrating on drawing in people from the surrounding region

replied to brownteeth
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

canalside needs residential...lots of residential to become an active part of the city. can't depend entirely on drawing people in unless you turn it into a major retail center and its not likely to happen anytime soon.. so in the meantime balance residential with retail as best you can as it builds out. but with that said i like the pegula plan better as two rinks, one with seating, and a larger hotel, will likely provide more activity as compared to the 42 residential units plus smaller hotel.

replied to norwood
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think that Pegula should have tried to get Canisius on board for this. They were looking for a new arena and could cover a share of the arena building costs.

We're a good hockey area and its a shame we don't seem to have any major hockey programs at the local universities. This could be a step in the right direction.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does anyone really trust Paladino?

Pegula's project would actually bring people into the region, help Canisius, fill a need, and generate some spinoff spending from the area from those vising the rinks, which operate 12 months of the year.

It's also valued twice as much, which means twice as much in property tax.

Pegula has been a man of his word. Paladino, not at all. No question as to which is superior. Pick Pegula and let's get moving.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

For those praising the detail in Paladino's proposal, did you actually look through the 70+ pages? I did and it's crap. There are mistakes everywhere and it looks like a 13 year old put it together on Powerpoint. Let's raise our standards a bit people. Pegula will make sure this gets done. I'd like Paladino's a bit more if the residential was condos instead of apartments, but I guess that would be far too revolutionary?

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The presentation (aired on the public access channel) by the representative of the owner, along with the reps from the construction and architect companies for Terry Pergula’s project, was impressive. Both companies had outstanding portfolios of their big bucks projects. Also, there was approximately six months of planning, visits to other cities and consultation with WNY companies (example: Benderson - for hotel details).

The commitment to Buffalo and the sizeable “investment” in it was emphasized. (Many millions of dollars would not be recouped.) To give more weight to that declaration, it was added that if Pegula wanted to just make more money he could drill another well.

Also, the intention is to have a broad spectrum of customers/users and to generate many jobs (1,000 plus, plus in the construction phase ─ hundreds after completion) with sincere concentration on using local contractors, vendors, etc. MBWE goals are to be vigorously monitored and it was cited that there were several previous projects where targets had been significantly exceeded. Helpful for local participation has been the partitioning of certain building jobs so they are manageable and achievable.

Yea! Mark Goldman was among those responding after the presentation. He, along with Andrew Rudnick, raised concerns about the relevant details that where not covered.

Casting a vote for Pergula's plan. It's open to tweaking and there's confidence it will be delivered timely and commendably.

Score: 10 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the residential component, but the hockey rink would be nice if it could also function as a meeting/exhibition space. Not to detract from the Statler and current CC, but that could be a great draw for conventions looking for a hotel under the same roof as meeting space and entertainment.

If it's just a rink, however, unable to be used for any other purposes... I'd definitely go with residential instead. A fair mix of condos and rentals would help bring a little more life into the area and help guide the development of canalside.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Putting out another rfp with a no subsidy stipulation sounds like a great idea but doesn't seem very realistic.

First, this project may be eligible for state and federal subsidies that are outside the jurisdiction of local government. The city would have no say on the project qualifying for New Market, green building or other programs offered by higher levels of government.

Second, putting a moratorium on local subsidies for this single property would be strangely arbitrary. What good reason would Benderson-PL be eligible for IDA funding for their place across the street while the Webster Block would not?

This property is literally surrounded by development/companies that have received subsidies and special treatment by the public sector (Sabres, Casino, PL-Benderson HSBC(?) etc). Why single the Webster Block out as a place that will receive different treatment than others?

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is quite unfortunate that there were no bidders from outside WNY.

Of the two entries, I like both concepts but would give the nod to Paladino.
This space is perhaps one of the regions greatest real estate assets.
Ice rinks have too narrow of an appeal.

Sure Buffalo is a hockey town, but that primarily refers to the NHL, during hockey season.
Yes there is a (relatively) big youth hockey interest, but what percentage of the population are we suggesting that appeals to ( less than 10%? ... and that is during the winter not spring and summer.

Finally, I would like to see the rinks built, but there must be alternative locations nearby the webster block that is not quite so prominent.

Score: -9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not sure why you don't consider Pegula an outside developer? He does not live here, has more money than most developers local or otherwise, and made his money from outside our region and is pumping it into our city. Name one other developer, that has offered a $123 million project with a zip code that doesn't start with 14...? Not to mention the outside money he spent on the Sabres organization already.

I think we forget that most of the great architecture we have was built in a time when money was no object and buildings/homes were built beautifully because the owner wanted to, not because it may or may not make more money. This sounds like the same concept with Pegula in terms of his motives.

replied to m_c_brighton
Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You might think hockey rinks are to "narrow of an appeal" but Paladino has no attraction at all, apartment rentals and speculative office space, where is the appeal there. The ice rinks are not to attract just locals but year round tournements as small as children as big as NCAA and World Juniors. Canisus and Niagara will host MAAC confrence finals just about every year, and the Frozen Four Championship will be helf year on a regular rotation. These visitors will fill the hotel and restaurants. Paladinos is a nice design but Pegulas is a better investment with more potential payoff.

replied to m_c_brighton
Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm all for having the Sabres develop the area, it would be a nice draw to have the rinks and the sports bar near the arena. It would be a great experience to skate a bit and get some beers/food before a hockey match. I think that is the key word; what plan is going to provide an "experience" for a visitor or local; not as much as what it looks like, in my opinion anyway. Plus, I worry about Palladino and his business sense. I worry it's not the best thing for downtown.

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A few weeks ago it was 80+ degrees and Sabres had Developmental Camp so I stopped by to watch and it was awesome being able to be near ice on a hot day, I love this concept. The Sabres already have a nice presence down there, the Sabres Store has a radio show air from there every week day 10a-12p, tour buses bring people in to tour the Arena, Pegula paying for the landscaping around the arena, all show Pegula is trying to make the area nicer, getting rid of the 'ghosttown'.

Meanwhile if you look around some of the tumbleweed is coming from Paladino Lots.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A rink will draw people in from the suburbs and surrounding area for youth hockey tournaments.

Residential, at this point, will bring people from other parts of the city to live in this area.

In my opinion, bringing suburbanites back into the city is Buffalo's biggest chance at success. Change the mentality about downtown and make it a place people want to go and are excited to go. This development, along with the rest of Canalside, should do this. Once we get our own metro area's residents to believe and invest in downtown then we can worry about tourists from other areas.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wolffman this is much bigger than bringing suburbanites back to the city, this is attaracting visitors for overnites and weekends from a 150+ mile radius (Cleveland, Erie, Sryacuse, Toronto) to spend outside money. residential is already on the rise and will continue, especially following this Webster developement.

replied to Wolffman
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You gotta walk before you can run. Let's worry about creating a great place for WNY'ers before we worry about attracting people from outside WNY.

replied to The Boss
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

as much as I want Pegula to do what he wants....I like Paladinos renderings better....it looks more pedestrian friendly and user friendly....

Score: -6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Pegula has proven to be a good neighbor, has the financial wherewithal, and his concept is double the investment over Paladino. As a previous poster stated, something more then just a mixed use project is needed to draw more people to the building and the duel rinks (which can also double as other playing surfaces) accomplish that. I would however like to see Pegula add in some residential units, perhaps some mid level condo's to offset building costs.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Building wise, they are both an effort to cram 10 ga. Sh.. into a 5 ga. Pale. Lots going on.

So, you have to look deeper. Click on the architect's websites, Charles Gordon has done that quaint (but successful) project on Main Street as well as a smattering collection of nice projects around WNY. Populous just did the Olympic stadium, in London, for the Olympics. As well as pretty much every new stadium constructed in this country over the last 25 years. The Pegula's are also showing a track record of getting things done.

How many chances does Carl get to disappoint the City of Buffalo?

Score: 11 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What I want to know, is if Ellicott get's picked, will Pegula plan to built this complex (or a similar one) in a near by parcel, or is he all-in or nothing on the Webster block. My thoughts are he wants to build this practice facility regardless but obviously webster is his first choice.

Why have one building when you can have 2?

I like Carl's best for this site, but i Like how Pegula's hotel is all along Main Stree, and will give you great views of Canalside. I don't see Joffrey Lupul complaining about his hotel views from here on out!

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How does the Pegula plan cost twice as much? If you remove the $40M for the hockey rink, the plans are similar in size. Why the $20M difference?

Wish there was a way to get both done.

Find a way for the city to acquire the HSBC Atruim parking lot and ask Pegula to build his plan there. He can add parking to replace what is lost and it would still be next door to HSBC arena.

In exchange for doing this, ask Carl to remove the hotel component from his plan and do just residential and office space.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I won't vote for one or the other because I'm glad something is going there (finally). But my choice would be something that will bring people to the area. That leans towards the hockey thing. We have plenty of other buildings that exist and can be converted to residential. You don't need to build new ones yet. The hockey concept already exists as the arena is there...let's build on it. (and by no means am I a hockey buff) But many are and they will come for any and all hockey stuff. While kids practice and dads watch games, other family members may want places to eat (restaurants) and shop (retail). Go Hockey!!

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Converted residential is different than new residential. Floor plans and ceiling height are much different between the two.

replied to buffaloroamer
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm sorry, but I'm confused. How do we know the ceiling height and floor plans of a new residential build as compared to a rehab. I live in a downtown apartment and while looking for one, chose the one that fit my needs best. And I have 12 foot ceilings and a great floor plan and it was not a new build. Many of the older buildings have very high ceilings and great architectural gems within the spaces. The floor plans are new as the builder usually demos back to the bare walls.

replied to longgone
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Why doesn't Carl take his idea, downsize it and use it in his Creamery building that's sitting vacant and an eyesore.
That building can hold a small hotel and apartments with retail on the first floor.

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i think a good part of the economics of either proposal is the large parking garage. that's why the proposals essentially look the same and thinking that either proposal could just be moved elsewhere doesn't quite make sense.

replied to downtown resident
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not saying move it, I'm saying he has a building (a large building) sitting vacant and an eyesore to the community a stone's throw from the new project he wants. He should clean up the crap he has first before starting a new project.

replied to nyc
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

If the Sabres' proposal is chosen (my personal preference), I hope Paladino/Ellicott has the decency to choose against any lawsuit/obstruction effort. Spiteful lawsuits are the achilles heel of Buffalo development. Either option is a huge step for canalside, Buffalo, and all of WNY.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A counter to this is if the Paladino/Ellicott proposal is chosen, I would hope that the Pegula plan is considered for another site.

After all, the claim is that the hockey facility is needed for the Sabres and the projections claim it would be an asset to the community. I would hope if they do not win the project they stand behind that.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually, if you watch the Sabres presentation, they are specific about the fact that this Facility is NOT for the Sabres. It is for public use. They also note that they will not be recouping their investment. The Sabres made the statement that this is not about money. Said something to the effect that if Pegula wanted more money, he would dig another well.

replied to longgone
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Also in re your question about cost differential, beyond the rinks. Not only is The Paladino hotel significantly smaller in the number of rooms, It is NOT a full service hotel. That probably means no restaurants, meeting, or conference rooms. These are Facilities which will be needed when Buffalo hosts major sports tournaments such a the juniors or the frozen four.

replied to longgone
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't go with the Paladino proposal - we DON'T need more office space (HUGE vacancy in the nearby tower and other buildings) and he doesn't have a good track record (Think of the Court street preferred status he had...what a joke.) I suspect the other porposal is VERY real and has the best chance of happening. Buffalo should not put all its eggs in one or two local baskets - that equals monopolized failure and the same BS put up with for a long time all ready.

Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

FYI - the first few comments suggest no pulic subsidy. No subsidy = NO development. Chicago, Philly and other MUCH larger cities even understand this. We're not London or Manhattan - WNY should get beyonjd its small town thoughts and learn why a subsidy is needed. Oh wait...its Buffalo the town of VERY few people who actually understand the word development.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

JMc, your side in favor of taxpayer subsidies will prevail no doubt, but hypothetically what would be the harm in at least trying?

Walden Galleria didn't and doesn't get those kind of handouts. I don't think the big proposed project on Maple (rejected for NIMBY reasons) in Amherst was demanding any. The Kohls that opened a couple years ago in N Buffalo didn't. The hotel owner quoted at the bottom of this doesn't
http://news.wbfo.org/post/new-downtown-hotels-relying-subsidies

Probably many other examples too.

Can you answer me this -
if Paladino can develop what he's proposing at Webster with (reportedly) a significantly lower amount of public subsidy than Pegula's demanding - then why is it so certain that nobody else would possibly do it for even less than Paladnio's amount?

replied to JMc44113
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I should note - both the pro-subsidy and anti-subsidy sides in this thread are arguing the general concept of them - until the details are eventually revealed about what kind and how much $ these would be given for these 2 proposals in particular.

For my part, examples of what I'm against are the kind of subsidies like the ECIDA type aid (given for the Benderson-Donovan next door to this, or to Premier Wines in Amherst, etc.) or NY state $ grants given to downtown Hyatt, and were offered for Croce's boutique hotel, Bass Pro, etc.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

But.."Buffalo is the 2nd poorest city."

Ha just kidding.. but that's straight from your link.



replied to whatever
Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

lol, good catch nyc!
Carl demoted (or promoted?) us to 2nd poorest. Maybe he just wanted to not sound like he's agreeing with Cuomo who seems to really like telling people Buffalo is 3rd poorest.

btw, the NYT says they're both wrong and Buffalo isn't even in the top 10 cities for that….
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/09/27/us/cities-with-the-highest-poverty-rates-in-2010.html
I wonder if people in cities on that list realize Carl would tell them their poorness indicates they aren't sufficiently subsidizing wealthy developers, upscale retailers, high income tenants of fancy apartments…

replied to nyc
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Whatever, that depends if you consider the infrastructure that was built to specifically accommodate the Galleria as a subsidy.

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

salt - I have no idea either way whether or not Walden Galleria's owners upon its construction reimbursed NYS for the change to the Thruway exit or Cheektowaga for a road off Union. (If anyone is certain either way, maybe they'll comment.)

Anyhow, even if they didn't, infrastructure around the Webster block is being heavily publicly funded and that spilled milk wasn't what I was criticizing now.

Although the public hasn't been told yet what the subsidies being demanded by Paladino or Pegula are for or how much they'd be in full, the reporting on it so far sounds beyond the infrastructure spending around it. It's been vague however. Perhaps more will be revealed soon.

replied to saltecks
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Being an outsider, I don't claim to know anything about Buffalo politics, money, or real estate, but the Pegula plan just seems to have more 'life' than the other plan. Specifically, It appears to have a more vibrant overall purpose and dynamic feel at street level. The Paladino plan looks clean, but just doesn't exude as much localized 'confidence'. It seems to me, a layman, that Buffalo's most lucrative market is Canada. Canadians love hockey. Buffalo, not just the Sabres, would do well to market itself as a 'Hockey Heaven'. In short, I'd be more inclined to make the trip from NYC to visit the HOK / Pegula project (and suspect the same of every person I know). It seems to uneducated me, that you would get back what you pay for it - as a truly regional draw with a realistic ( but awesome) plan.

Score: 6 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Both proposals are tasteless monstrosities but the Sabres proposal features more integrity and flow than the weird Ellicott mutt. Nothing special in either case but a marked improvement over a big empty lot.

Score: -2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

God..is it a subsidy if the government shouldn't be taking your money in the first place and takes WAYYYY to much in the end? Bunch of winers...these people are proposing multi million dollar projects that will put other people to work and they wanna minimize the debt load that results from the government authorized shake down? Gawsh..shame on them.

I love love love the last picture thats street view of the Sabres proposal. This will be a great start and lead to another heavy stream of people the in the area to shop at local businesses. We could use residential in other places much much more...5 minutes down Main Street to be exact.

Sabres proposal all the way..but I can't help but think how great it would be in its original location. The big blue wall at West Utica and Main (when Pegula was talking to Canisus?)..this could be a great start to the mid-town "College District" that doesn't exist at the moment lol..but could from Forest Lawn to Harvard Place.

I 2nd the above..Mr. Pegula..if for some reason you're not picked please built this project elsewhere!!! Same for Carl..I won't hold my breath though.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

All of the people that talk about needing an attraction to get people downtown have it all wrong.

It's about getting people to LIVE downtown. Getting people to LIVE there is the only way to have sustained development.

How many silver-bullet projects designed to get people to come downtown have to fail before you people wake up and realize that it's the wrong approach?

Therefore, I like Paladino's idea. I think Terry should definitely build his idea too, but build it east of the arena - not on the Webster Block.

Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Let me toss a curveball out there. What about the block east of the arena. I know there's some metal fabricating business in there. That place would be an amazing building for residentail. Why doesnt some buy that place and pack it with condos. I bet they'd sell like hot cakes. Also, what about the Blacksmith shop. With all this investment going on how come someone hasnt jumped in to buy these properties. That block is a gold mine waiting to happen. Ps if anybody is interested in putting together a development plan let me know. I have a financial backer that would chip in a couple thousand.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No takers :-(

replied to Up and coming
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I do like what Paladino is getting his "inspiration". However, the buildings should be separate but connected. Putting two buildings from different ages on top of one another gives it the drop a building on a building feel. That being said parking should be underground and restricted to the number of spaces needed for residences and hotel. Otherwise "prime real estate" is being wasted as it is today. There is sufficient parking up and down Main, Perry, Exchange etc for Sabre games or Atrium/News employees. Lastly, substitute additional rentals or hotel in lieu of office space. Downtown needs residences not more office space. The Pegula proposal is not all guaranteed- built as needed and can go anywhere and is no better than a casino. I feel both proposals have sufficient negatives that warrant a thanks but no thanks at this time.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ellicott Development is teaming up with Castle Mosey LLC on a $64 million proposal that is pending on $63,999,999.00 in tax brakes.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Both are great ideas. A combination of the two could work as well. A new arena used for local tournaments complimented by a hotel, shopping and eating area could work very well. An infusion of new ideas is ideal.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

ot worthy of her; for her knew, or believed, that a young girl of her sweetness and tenderness and devotedness of disposition would by her sweetness attract a lover too early, and by her tenderness respond to him too readily, and by her devotedness follow him too blindly, before she had time to know herself or men. And he also knew, or believed, that first love is as often a will-o'-the-wisp as the star for which all young things take it. Five days in the week he tended the gardens of Alfriston, the sixth he gave to the Lord of the Burgh that lay among the hills, and the seventh he kept for his daughter on the hill a few miles distant, which was afterwards known as Hobb's Hawth. She on her part spent her week in endeavoring to grow a perfect rose of a certain golden species, and her heart was given wholly to her father and her flower. And he watched her efforts with interest and advice, and for the first she thanked him but of the second took no heed. "For," said she,dallas cowboys jerseys, "this is MY garden, father, and MY rose, and I will grow it in my own way or not at all. Have you not had a lifetime of gardens and roses which you have brought to perfection? And would you let any man take your own upon his shoulders, even your own mistakes, and shoulder at last the praise after the blame?" Then Hobb, her father, laughed at her indulgently and said, "Nay, not any man; yet once I let a woman, and without her aid I would never have brought my rarest and dearest flower to perfection. So if I shoul

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Upon first glance I like the Sabres plan. I think Paladino's plan to model the building to look like all the other old buildings around is a nice thought, but fails to hit the mark. The Sabres building has a look that fits the art deco style, but is also much more modern and exciting. I really like the ice rink idea too, and I think it will be a huge draw. This is a big opportunity for the the development and revialization of Downtown Buffalo, and we need to get it right. People need to be excited about it to make it successful, and The Sabres, with Pegula backing are the only team with the power to do that. Especially consiering the location being right next to the arena. Give it to Pegula and let him run with it.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment