City June 23, 2012 12:05 AM

Painting for Preservation Heading to Amherst Street Today

Painting for Preservation Heading to Amherst Street Today
Painting for Preservation will be on Amherst Street today bringing attention to a historic property.  In collaboration with Artsphere Gallery, artists of varying mediums will be capturing the unique architecture of 481 Amherst Street.  

Painting for Preservation seeks to bring together artists of all media in support of historic distressed properties and communities. Artwork created on-site related to the location is seen as a means of raising positive awareness of the space and/or structure.

481 Amherst was was built in 1923 by Valentine Homik who commissioned architect Karl Schmill to design it.  Schmill was the same architect who designed Assumption Church and School.  It was a Socony gas station at the outset, Standard Oil Company of New York, which then became Mobil.  It was a Mobil Station up until 1981.  It is in need of some TLC today.  Investment in this building makes really good sense given all that is happening on Amherst Street and Black Rock.

The P4P folks will be at 481 Amherst from 9:30 am until 1 pm.

Get Connected: P4P Facebook page.
View image

Comments

Leave a comment

How ironic that a group has chosen to paint a picture of a long time neighborhood eyesore who's city and county has been slow or non existent in getting any progress to take a historic bldg with a history to its former beauty.Perhaps the publicity here produce some results.
Its' long time owner, PHIL ORTEL,has been in and out of housing court in the past 6 years, and currently being written again as we speak by dist. insp Kevin Gould for various violations, and of a previous 2009 Housing Court settlement when HON. Henry Nowak sat on the bench.
There is over $8400.00 in back County taxes owed going back to 2001!...the County wont in-rem foreclose because as a policy it doesn't touch City of Buffalo properties...and the City wont foreclose unless past due city taxes are owed! As this property sits in a "gray area" of back tax dilemma...the county taxpayers are shortchanged, and the city's up and coming neighborhood suffers. City leaders need to get their act together and close the back tax loopholes that exist, , expedite enforcement of "valued" properties as such...and support local business leaders as they strive to rebuild a business district.
I have spoken to Lou Petrucci, chief bldg insp, who has been very helpful in getting this property and owner back to Housing Court.
I have spoken with both chief County and City tax collectors regarding the BACK TAXES owed on this property...and their hands are tied...each finding only excuses why they cant go after the owner, and get this property on the foreclosure list so a responsible potential owner can develop this corner blding into an asset to Amherst st....rather than a liability.
Many people have inquired and / or attempted to purchase this property, but the owner sits steadfast in his deliberate decay during his current ownership.
Perhaps now, with some varied attention, a momentum will be created whereas there may be a future for this building on 479 Amherst st.
Believe me ..I know, as a long time property owner in the neighborhood, and owning the property adjacent..I have seen how the irresponsible actions...on many fronts, have caused a beautiful building to become an eyesore...only stepped up enforcement, actions on the part of city and county govt can bring this building back to life.

Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Often I think quick reading leads to the first sentence determining the perspective of a comment. Glad I kept reading. Good comment.

replied to joey d
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm not trying to discount the efforts to save this building, but could someone elaborate on what makes this building beautiful, unique or special? Is it the history? I've passed this building many times any never thought much of it at all. Does it have more going for it than simply being an old gas station on a corner lot?

Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, as the article says, it was architect-designed -- something that became a rarity after gas stations became mostly stand-alone, utilitarian structures. Eventually, gas stations became mostly cookie-cutter designed for basic functionality and to some degree for brand identification. That mean basically the same design plopped down on cleared lots in multiple communities. This gas station, instead, is a rare example of almost autochthonous design -- the architect chosen had already designed some of the most significant structures in the neighborhood, just a couple blocks away. It's also a mixed-use design, incorporation a storefront operation, gas station, and housing. How often do you encounter something like that--?

If you get a sec, pop by the event in the course of your Saturday morning errand running (or whatever). Hear more about the building, meet the great Doreen (owner of Artsphere), and maybe even say "meow" to Buffalo's friendliest cat, who lives on the adjacent block of Howell Street.

replied to rpm40
Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thank you for this article. I've wondered about this building for years and have only vague memories of it when it was a gas station.

With the adjacent building so close, did cars have to pull in and back out when they were accessing the gas pumps?

Are their any old photos that show this building during its heyday?

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've had an idea for this property for a couple years. If the owner would only let it go...

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Here's an idea..Why don't we get the artists to paint the BUILDING instead of painting a picture of it?????????????????

Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's brick

replied to Lego1981
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sheesh, we go through this every time p4p announces a date & location. why aren't they painting the building instead of their canvases? because it doesn't belong to them and the owner can have them arrested for trespassing and/or vandalism.

replied to Lego1981
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Did they ever remove the gas storage tanks? I'm pretty sure any prospective business venture would have to complete that first before anything new could occur and those costs would deter many...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes. As M-Rodgers indicated above, the main issue for any new use for the property is the owner won't let it go.

replied to warrenavenue
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The gas storage tanks were removed...2009...part of conditional discharge in Housing Court. EPA was invovlved and all permits were in order...but only after an attempt of otherwise.

Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Telling tales out of school: Sara Zak ran down to Wegmans & bought a paint set for the little girl who lives in the house in the yard of which the artists were painting/sketching.

Sara Zak rocks!

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

way to go, sara. art saves lives. i really believe that.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I've always liked this building. I would love to see a restaurant here utilize the built-in canopy for a patio.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment