Mayor Brown Publicly Opposes Busti Avenue Demolitions
Comments
Leave a commentYah we need that duty free store and oversized truck plaza for world trade! Shame on Brown for jumping in at the 11rh hour to block the neighborhood wreckers!
I heard they are going to allow fracking on this site as well.
as long as the fracking wells are built to the curb it's cool.
Give credit where credit is due--way to go Byron. It's curious that the UBLIC (not "Peace") Bridge Authority came forth with the following statement as a result: ""There is no relation between the houses being demolished on Busti and plaza expansion whatsoever. We don't have a plaza expansion project at the current time. The city owns Busti Avenue."
If that is the case, then Byron can halt the demo.
What's the UBLIC? Does it have any clout/power? If not, sit back down and keep it n your pants.
Interesting. After demolishing half of the East side he says this.
salt, do you seriously not think there's a huge difference between what happens to these 8 houses compared to so many other city neighborhoods having literally thousands of long-vacant blighted houses creating dangers like arson risks, etc?
Yeah both relate to demolition but otherwise it's apple and oranges, no?
Kudos to the Mayor!
The PBA has ignored the Buffalo Preservation Board. By City Charter all demolitions are to come before the board for review to determine whether they may be eligible for the National Register of Historic. More importantly the Wilkeson House is already a local landmark and and any alteration including demolition is required to be reviewed. A letter was sent to the PBA reminding them of this. The PBA has ignored the requests.
Arrogance!
Very clever, politically.
Without at all opposing the concept of an expanded truck plaza or a future second bridge here - both of which the mayor has said many times that he strongly favors - he can gain some praise from preservation advocates by weighing in on this side issue of the process for how 8 houses are dealt with by the PBA which is a NY state govt agency.
Icing on the cake is this makes his longtime rival Sam Hoyt by comparison look like even more of a bad guy to factions who supported Hoyt so much in the past. Funny!
A bit of downside political risk is irritating Cuomo, but my guess is as YesSir said the response from up top will be amusement - maybe even some admiration if any of Cuomo's people thinks of the irony regarding Hoyt.
This is nothing more than political grandstanding. Brown could care less about these buildings.
ANYONE..who cant see this as a potical ploy has to be a moron...this empty suit has been asleep at the wheel for years....and grasps a few headlines at the 11th hour,knowing how short voters' memories are here in Buffalo...looks to add another mark to his political playlist...and citizens here in Bufalo have proven to be gullible enough to swallow it all.....it would be comical...if it werent so sad! ...and who says history dont repeat itself ....especially in Buffalo!
No doubt, but political ploys are smart sometimes.
In the end there's no realistic way the plaza expansion won't happen, and also no realistic chance that truck traffic will be banned from a Buffalo-FortErie crossing during any of our lifetimes.
So wouldn't these houses being so very close to truck fumes mean they'd be dangerous for anybody to live in anyway? (Unless there's a 180-flip in opinion on that, and suddenly being so near the fumes isn't dangerous?)
Won't that leave moving the houses as the only serious alternative to demolition? What good would it do to leave them vacant at their current locations for another bunch of decades?
I don't know how feasible (physically or economically) it would be to move them, but if the mayor's political ploy results in that possibility being looked at more closely… well, that might be the only practical thing the protesting groups could hope for regarding all this, so it could turn out to be a bit of a win for them.
Lol! Since when is a politician being responsive to his constituents a ploy?
pres, those aren't mutually exclusive in the political world. Something can be both a strategic ploy and responding to requests of (some, not all) constituents.
A lot of his constituents in the city favor expanding the PB truck plaza as a concept while not caring much either way about the 8 vacant houses. If he's smart politically, he should also keep those constituents in mind - as it seems he's doing.
That portion of constituents won't favor causing any huge delay in the plaza expansion project, but maybe if something can be at least considered to relocate some or all of the 8 houses or let them stay there (presumably vacant indefinitely if nearby truck fumes are really a serious health risk) - while still allowing plaza expansion in a reasonable time frame, that might be okay too.
True it is possible that this could be both a ploy and good public service. But based purely on the above letter it sounds more like some of you are being overly creative in trying to rationalize a move that you may not agree with (no offense but your take that this is somehow a jab at Sam Hoyt sounds especially far fetched).
He's just trying to get the PBA to the table with other stakeholders. That doesn't sound like grandstanding, being asleep at the wheel, or even being politically clever. It sounds like good leadership.
pres, I won't interpret anybody else's comments. Mine speculated the Hoyt factor was "icing on the cake". A bonus rather than the main motivation of the administration. I don't see how it's far fetched to think at least it's a nice bonus, considering their history as rivals.
I'm surprised you won't agree it's a convenient coincidence that BB is being cheered on here in this thread while SH was criticized in the previous thread last week on this same topic. Wouldn't Brown/Casey at least get a smirk about that if anybody mentioned to them any of those comments here?
Aside from Hoyt, I see this as an interesting local example of triangulation in the style Bill Clinton and Dick Morris made famous.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation_(politics)
Brown all along has had identical positions with the PBA on what I think are the main issues - he favors in concept helping truck flow by adding a 2nd bridge if and when funding is available for it, and he favors truck plaza expansion before that.
Now using this narrow issue of 8 vacant houses, he's suddenly in the media looking like a centrist-mediator between the anti-trucking-at-PB side and the pro-trucking-at-PB side, all while staying very much in the latter group in all other ways. -shrug-
(btw/fwiw - it's nothing to do with me disagreeing about the 8 houses. I don't care either way what happens to 8 houses, although I favor an expansion of the truck plaza.)
Its probable that the actual straw Mayor Brown is trying to grasp by suddenly taking an interest in this demo project is the city ownership of the NFTA harbor.
I tend to agree. Brown isnt going to do anything about the demolitions and knows Cuomo wont either. Brown is just looking for:
-a deal to shut him up with the Bridge Authority / NFTA
-a public image that he can point to with the voters
Get Brown out of office. He is a male version of Muriel Howard and take Rev Pigeon with him.
There are no churches more political and worthy of having their tax exempt status removed than African American churches. They have been a pure political and business foundation for 50 years masquerading as a church.
@paulsobo:
"There are no churches more political and worthy of having their tax exempt status removed than African American churches. They have been a pure political and business foundation for 50 years masquerading as a church."
ROFL!
And, as we all know, White churches NEVER get involved in politics.
*stares hard at Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority*
SAY WHAT YOU WILL.. about the REV...but he has suprisingly been a more responive.. and breath of honesty and practicality in his role as a councilman.HE HAS SHOWN TO BE INTELLIGENT AND PRACTICAL IN HIS DEALINGS WITH ISSUES ...that have surfaced in Buffalo...true...but he has along way to go to shed the stereotype of the Rev Jesse and Al Sharpton...and it's not all his fault. A REV.livin' in a half million $$ waterfont condo...while his constituents live in minimal or substandard housing REALLY doesnt do much for his sincerity!
I agree re: Pridgen, actually. I was very skeptical for various reasons, but I think he's been alright so far; and far from the worst. Frankly, I'm liking him better than the mayor lately.
I agree too. I was skeptical myself but so far he has been a squeeky wheel dealing with real quality of life issues. To my surprise he seems to be spreading that evenly all over his district and not just east of Main street. So far I can honestly say he is making a difference and doesn't seem to be favoring any specific area, gender, race, etc.
Thank you, Mayor Brown, for taking a stand!
But as for Senator Grisanti, who was quoted in the Buffalo News today (link below) calling the properties "a blight on the community," and saying that they need to be taken down...if that's his attitude toward the community he's supposed to represent, pehaps he's the one who needs to be taken down -- this November. Senator Grisanti, you're supposed to fight for the community...not just fight!
http://www.buffalonews.com/city/communities/west-side/article894026.ece
Please. Brown has had years to deal with this. Now its in the press he is publicly saying something. He is Buffalo's biggest embarrassment. So surprised this was not followed up with a picture of him writing his letter at that stupid ass podium of his.
These homes have been shuttered up for over a decade. I worked at the Episcopal home for a bit in my youth, and the domicilliary building is a beautiful example of Buffalo's rich architechtural past. However, no one had expressed interest in purchasing these buildings before the PBA snatched them up and it would take a TON of money to restore any of those homes to their former glory. Too little, too late. Build a new plaza PBA. Brown is just covering his butt at the eleventh hour after YEARS of silence. There has got to be some sort of sly motive to this. Only time will tell......
I would rather have a black hole in space leading to endless depths of the universe than a truck plaza.
Soon you'll have both, consider yourself lucky.
I'll say this much about Mayor Brown: he puts the "fashion" in "fashionably late."
Darius Pridgen needs to detach himself from that religiously based rent-to-own housing project he is working on. After that, he very recently appears to be approaching a wider audience than only those following his religious ministries.
Then again, Pridgen might still intend to follow in the footprints of Rev. Stenhouse(sp)--a long-time religious minister and housing developer, and also Arthur O. Eve and James Pitts, all who did quite well for themselves without leading their followers to home ownership vs renting minus putting down roots.
And, again, Mayor Brown's truly most current interst has to be his trying to put a stranglehold on the waterfront while he is still mayor.
How many more terms can Byron Brown be mayor?
I agree, it seems Pridgen is more focused on the area 'around' True Bethal and not the Ellicott District (downtown/allentown). I never see him attend or walk around these areas EVER, never a response when calling or emailing him (his office) regarding issues or concern in downtown. I truly believe I would get a faster response (or one at all) if I were a member of his congregation. But, I'm not, so I get nothing from him. And don't get me started on the Mayor. Thankfully, this is his last term.
I have worked in engineering/design for almost my entire career mostly making other people look good except on the occasions where I have screwed-up...but I digress.
A common denominator I have noticed in upper engineering management is that there is seldom any thought or attempt at any form of compromise or meeting the public half way.
If I were involved in this project, my first approach would have been on restoring the Wilkeson-Storms Mansion or 771 Busti Avenue back into its former glory; not so much because I am such a nice guy who is geared towards preservation but in order to alleviate the debacle that has developed over the demolition of this whole collection of homes.
Yes, a simple act of diplomacy or, no-brainer, would have kept the public’s attention focused on the main attraction while we systematically demolished the surrounding structures with a nary a gasp of protest.
But, using common sense and a slight tactic in diplomacy would never even enter the heads of the individuals in charge as arrogance seems to be the true motivating factor on both sides of this equation.
The PBA doesn't own the Episcopal Church Home yet! It has only been for sale to the PBA, as D'Youville College was interested in purchasing it. Your tax dollars will be bailing the Episcopal Church Home out from their blighted by neglect properties. New York State is going to give the PBA $15 million dollars to purchase the property-funny how it was only valued at $11 million before they vacated it!
Let's change the conversation to talk about how the PBA illegally purchased the 7 properties on Busti Ave. There is one more that the deal will most likely close on very soon. (Also-they may purchase another one on RhodeIsland St.) Why did the city allow the PBA to purchase these homes to begin with. Yes, they are now blighted, but weren't when they purchased them almost 17 years ago.
So Grisanti says they must go so the PBA can expand the plaza, but the PBA says they will just be green space (for 2 minutes).
I think Senator Grisanti forgot his family member lives not so far away from the bridge to be in danger of health problems from the diesel emissions! He should read the asthma research done by Dr. Mukasa!
LONDON, June 12 (Reuters) - Diesel engine exhaust fumes can cause cancer in humans and belong in the same potentially deadly category as asbestos, arsenic and mustard gas, World Health Organisation (WHO) experts said on Tue sday.
In an announcement that caused consternation among car and truck makers, the France-based International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the WHO, reclassified diesel exhausts from its group 2A of probable carcinogens to its group 1 of substances that have definite links to cancer.
The experts, who said their decision was unanimous and based on "compelling" scientific evidence, urged people across the world to reduce exposure to diesel fumes as much as possible.
"The (expert) working group found that diesel exhaust is a cause of lung cancer and also noted a positive association with an increased risk of bladder cancer," it said in a statement.
The decision is a result of a week-long meeting of independent experts who assessed the latest scientific evidence on the cancer-causing potential of diesel and gasoline exhausts.
It puts diesel fumes in the same risk category as noxious substances such as asbestos, arsenic, mustard gas, alcohol and tobacco.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




And Cuomo's response: uproarious laughter followed by the middle finger and a polite F-off Mayor phone call. I'm actually surprise the Mayor even knew this was all going on