Sabres and Ellicott Development Face Off for Webster Block
Comments
Leave a commentI like the sound of the Paladino proposal. That sounds like it would be roughly 15 storys.
New Construction is not the same as a rehab project.
The Paladino proposal sounds like the only one that fits in with the goals of Canalside.
The Sabres proposal sounds like blank walls plus one restaurant. Hardly a good location for that.
The 3rd proposal is lacking any info at all...
I see what you're saying about benefits of Paldino's proposal too, but if he'd be open to putting it on another Canalside parcel or elsewhere nearby then both could happen and aid Canalside in different ways…. the Sabres thing drawing a semi-regular flow of people for college and youth hockey, and the Paladino thing drawing hotel guests and office workers.
Or the opposite could happen too - if Paladino's thing is on Webster the Sabres thing could be somewhere else nearby.
The City and ECHDC should of course try to find an approach that maximizes the chances of both happening. Maybe there's even some way a combination with both at Webster somehow if Paladino and the Sabres are open to collaborating.
Paladino would probably "milk" the surface parking as long as possible and building on the site might happen in 10 years or maybe not. The Sabres plan I imagine would be done as fast as feasible. Pegula and Paladino are two different birds.
Where are you getting blank walls from? Have you seen the design proposal? Are you just assuming things? I doubt we'll see a giant barn rink, I bet it will look great and fit in. Pegula is not cheap, I know this doesn't automatically give him right to do what he wants but I have more faith in him following through with his promises than Carl.
I agree with those that like the Sabres Option. Putting this kind of a development close to the arena build off of all the assets that the Sabres and community have invested in that area. You could imagine using both the new proposal and FN Center together. Plus if a Zamboni breaks, they already have a backup or the tools to fix it.
Paladino's proposal is fine but can go anywhere. I don't think you would want to put the hockey rinks anywhere. How about they join forces and combine their proposals. Nothing says you can't put a hotel above the hockey rinks and the garage below...
Then we could remove some of those surface lots over in the cobblestone district!! ;)
Ditto to others saying a hybrid would be ideal. [However, my fear with Paladino involved with anything is that the project would languish given his record for Creamery, Court St., Graystone.]
A rink(s)alone, even with a little commercial space, is not high enough use for the parcel. I was hoping for something sexier and unique for the 'prime' parcel.
Why not wait until something is actually built at Canalside. The sabres can built a rink in numerous locations in or around downtown. I agree that there should be more competition to develop this land.
Sounds like Canisius finally has a plan for its hockey program. There's nowhere to build it near campus, and they were looking to partner with the Sabres from the start. I'm sure their students and alums would have no problem hopping on the train to see them play downtown. Awesome news.
How much demand does Buffalo still have for Hotels and Office space? Serious question, I don't know the stats, and considering a hotel is being put in next door, Lafayette, Statler etc. How bad do we need this?
I'm a huge Sabres fan so my heart backs the Sabres but I'm trying to look at this objectively. The Sabres would add a pretty cool destination (pun intended). Knowing Pegula would spend whatever money, I think this rink will be top notch, take a look around at newer rinks, they aren't all big boxes. They easily could follow all the Historic and Urban design guidelines. It would offer shelter from the heat in summer and the snow in winter, just another cool place to walk around in. They could rent the rink and have hockey going on 24/7. Personally I enjoy watching hockey so even a beer league would be added scenery.
Sports Restaurant is a great destination too, all the bad business aside, I enjoyed Jim Kellys Bar back in the day and wish we had something like Wayne Gretzkys in Toronto. I know all the foodies will throw risotto at their monitor but I like those type of places and so do tourists.
can someone with hospitality info fill me in on how our Hotel rates are and if we really have a demand? Is this a chicken egg situation with demand for hotels and attractions to bring in the people?
I know the Embassy Suites in the Avant is one of the most on demand hotels in the state. Also, I've always heard that Buffalo is way behind the power curve as far as hotels located in the city. I read an article saying that Buffalo is passed over for larger events (NHL All-Star game) because of our lack of hotel space in the DT core. In the article it said that Buffalo had something like 1,500 hotel rooms availabe downtown and 8,000 in the whole county. When you compare this to places like Ottowa who have 8,000 in their DT core it really puts things into perspective.
It's funny you mention the NHL All-Star game, I have a feeling Pegula has this in mind as well.
...yes, Canada's capital and 2nd(?) largest city has more hotel space and hosts more events than Buffalo. That doesn't really factor into the issue of whether Buffalo itself can support more hotel rooms or not. Whether we have to pass on 1 Allstar game every 30 years or not is an extremely moot point - the business viability of the other 11,000 days is what matters.
I'm no reporter or anything, but what I've heard from people working in the Avant is that Embassy Suites is even looking to expand. If not feasible in the building, then nearby.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/sabres-nhl/article717450.ece
Ottawa tourism officials estimated the city sold 7,000 hotel room nights for the All-Star Game. Gallagher-Cohen said Western New York has 9,000 rooms available. There would be no problem finding space for either the All-Star Game or Winter Classic because January is not peak travel season in Buffalo.
The problem with Buffalo's hotel's is that most of them are located in the suburbs and not in the City core. The city has very few hotel options. As where most of Ottowa's hotels are located DT.
I think it would be a disappointment to city hall considering the fact that they had expected many proposals and interest from far and wide. Instead they got three proposals and it appears like out of town developer money isnt interested in a "prime" parcel. Certainly its nice to see development proposals from those with interest in and historically embedded within the community but i'm concerned that Buffalo remains off the map to out of town money and developers. Perhaps its the fact that development nationwide has slowed to a snails pace and banks arent lending still but I guess the question is considering the WNY market, just how "prime" is one of the most prime downtown parcels? What drove the out of town interests away? Perceptions and rumors about Buffalo? The market itself looking at income, population? Tax burden? Vacancy rates? Im thinking the NYS, County and local tax rates need to be reduced to align themselves with neighboring or nearby states including Pennsylvania, Ohio, etc. I dont know what that number is but if NYS is more expensive its time to keep up with the jones's here and be similar to your neighbors.
Can the Sabres and Ellicott hybridize their plan into one bigger mixed use plan with all those elements?
I hate the thought that something is better than nothing but I'm a little ambivalent here. A hockey rink produces constant activity. I just hope they're smart about parking solutions, ie. underground or attractive garage design that doesn't take up considerable space. I'm curious to see design ideas that wouldn't completely block out the arena atrium.
Sabres plan is not something for everyone/year round as suggested by the city. So, I hope we don't end up with that.
Paladino plan sounds good, but how many years will we see an empty lot? (still waiting for a tower on Court St. that has been talked about by him since the early 2000's).....
Here is why i like Carl's plan:
Downtown Buffalo needs more buildings (especially newbuild) with larger floor plates. How is Cuomo & Co. expected to lour in out of town companies with our existing product? Can anyone think of a building with plates bigger than 30K SF, near shopping,eating, entertainment that isn't in Larkin???
Large companies don't want to be in the elevator all day but want to walk on one continuous floors to access other employees (see HSBC and why it wants out of the tower)
Yeah, new buildings that will solve everything. There is no empty office space in the city already. Let's just build a bunch of new buildings and watch the business come flocking in. Things like high taxes, horrible airport, bad schools, weather, etc. won't matter.
Once again the city is blind to the fact that the parcel and area down there isnt that exciting...The fact that we cant get out of town developers interested is really sad.....But the city needs to get their nose out of this anyway
I just think we have not hit the tipping point yet for outside developers. If either plan goes forward, along with Marriott, Childrens Museum and the Food Marketplace, then I think you'll see the nationals line up. Just not enough synergy yet, but it is getting close.
I'm curious: why would any of these proposals have to "follow the Canal Side design plan", when the Donovan did not?
If Paladino say's 'retail & restaurants' for this, I'd be alittle nervous. He's known for putting 'public assistance, parol offices, drug addiction, etc.' in his first floor spaces.....If he is able to get 'retail & restaurants' then why not do the same for his MAIN STREET buildings? We could have a much more pleasent downtown vibe right now if he had put in 'retail & restaurants' in his buildings between Mohawk & Court St. instead of the lowest of lowest which is why we need officer patrols daily parked at Lafayette Square. I don't trust this man.
I think the answer to both of those questions from Lego is more likely 'location, location, location', rather than 'Carl, Carl Carl'.
Lego>"If Paladino 'can' do something this great on the waterfront, then why the hell can't he do the same for his other city developments??????? Instead of plopping a parol office, drug addiction and other social service offices along the first floors in his main street buidlings, why not retail and restaurants???? ..."
I'd bet the likely reason 460 Main St is rented to governments for parole & social services instead of used for "retail and restaurants" is that building's lack of market demand from potential retail/restaurant tenants.
If there were demand from retail/restaurant tenants, why wouldn't we see much more growth of those already in so much vacant space downtown on Main St?
(I know you might say in part it's because clients of parole & soc services are a discouragement to retailers & restaurants, ...but those offices would be downtown somewhere even if not in that building. Heap office for example is elsewhere on Main, in a building not owned by CP if I'm not mistaken.)
Lego>"...how's that 'Court Street Tower' coming along, looks great so far (still an empty parking lot!)"
Again, is there sufficient market demand for office tenants in that? Is anyone else constructing a lot of new office space in non-waterfront downtown in recent years? Pretty much 'no', right? There was Avant office space mostly for one law firm, and the building next to Ch 2, maybe a few other smaller things… not very much new office space at all over the past 5 years.
Looks strange to single out CP for blame if nobody else building any either.
It's been widely predicted the past few years that most office space in HSBC tower is likely to become empty after 2013. Might not that make it difficult to get office tenant commitments for a Court St new office building?
That could also be a problem for the office space component of what CP proposes on Webster. His guess might be that being closer to the waterfront (&/or as part of a larger new development) is more attractive to potential office tenants compared to Court St.
Who knows, maybe he's received more positive reaction from potential office tenants for Webster than he was getting for Court St.
I still think Pegula's proposal is probably the better of the two (although I don't claim expertise in evaluating), but for Buffalo's sake hopefully either of the proposals will shift to a different parcel and both can happen at least to some extent - even if portions of one or both are reduced a bit.
As I mentioned earlier, if the evaluation concludes CP's proposal is best except there's a huge worry that he'd leave Webster empty for years, the City can simply put wording into the deal which cancels it if that happens.
I support Paladino's proposal. It suits the goals of Canalside much better. If Pegula needs to build a rink (which I think is a great idea), he should look no further then the massive parking lot between Perry and South Park, west of the Arena.
Leave Delaware North and its craptacular crap alone. We need their corner cutting and price gouging like we need more uppity yups on this site.
Paladino has been sitting on his Court Street site for years, with nothing to show for it except a law suit.
Pegula and the Sabres, along wih Delaware North will get their building done. And it will be a quality project. See Pegula's ice rink at Penn State.
I don't trust Paladino, don't think he does good work, and his character leaves a lot to be desired.
A mixed use, ice rink/restaurant/retail building can be designed to work with Canalside. It doesn't need to have blank walls.
If anyone can pull this off, Pegula can.
If Carl wins, he needs to start his project by next year, so he will be forced to get things going. This will be the project most under the microscope so dont you think he will have a flame under his butt to get things going?
I agree. Besides, how would cozying up to Pegula be a bad thing? Let him build what he wants. Public $ won't even be an issue. Any other developer won't make that claim. Jamestown Savings Bank Arena is a nice design to follow; not bad from the street either.
I, like most have heard about Pegulas donation to Penn State but just saw the renderings and never thought about how you could layer the rinks the way they are there. Pretty amazing. http://www.gopsusports.com/sports/m-hockey/spec-rel/012012aac.html
That overlaps, but you could literally build one over the other. There's also a rink in Finland that is completely below ground, looks like Sabreland with the low roof, except the low roof isn't a result of the place being a dump, it's the result of it being in a cavern.
I'm confused why people think another hockey rink (next door to a hockey rink) is going to bring constant activity. How many people hang out by the FN Center when there's no game going on. Zero. How many outward-facing restaurants and shops are included in the FN Center today. Zero. How much street activity is there around the FN Center when there's no game... zero. The new practice rinks would include only 1 restaurant for a 2 acre 4-corner site. I don't think that would create round-the-clock activity the way some seem to think it would.
I haven't seen details for any of the plan, so yes, I'm making some assumptions here. But 1 restaurant on an entire block paints a pretty boring image for canalside.
See: constant activity of Northtown Center. Plus like saltecks said, it will attract a higher level of hockey. Junior leagues will want to hold tournaments there. Don't forget, the Sabres organization has their eye on development at all levels, and this would fit right into that.
As far as design, multiple pads doesn't necessarily mean sprawled out design. Check out the Capitals facility in a shopping mall in Arlington: it's located on the 7th floor.
Terry Pegula isn't a Buffalo or WNY politician. He isn't going to skimp and he isn't going to pitch fluff.
Exactly. The Northtown center has activity 7 days a week. Additional space for local leagues, open skates, etc.
More people in the area can only help the restaurants/bars surrounding the Arena.
I agree, a rink next to a rink is redundant. But there're many reasons it makes sense. The surface at FNC can't be booked for things and is limited in use because it needs to be maintained and kept in top condition. Plain and simple, the more it is skated on the more wear and less time for upkeep. The reason there are ZERO people at the arena when there are no events is because... THERE ARE NO EVENTS. Hence, there is no street activity.
On a serious related note, if a garage is attached or underground, then like others mentioned it would be feasible to think that people could come into town, play their game/kids game, and leave without ever stepping foot outside. If this were the case I still believe there would be plenty of activity created, however this would just decrease it.
Hockey rinks are meccas. People flock there from all over. You build a nice one, make it an attraction, it'll be like moths to a light. Jamestown Savings Bank Arena is a great example of what would work in this spot.
Combine them. What a cool and unique venue it would be.
You just can't go wrong when two very savvy billionaires, both of whom own hockey teams, collaborate on a project. The proposed complex, when combined with the adjacent FN arena, will probably constitute one of the largest ice based venues in the world. It represents a critical mass with the potential to attract major national and international hockey and skating events.
Some comments are from people who aren't around the local rinks. Have you been by the Pepsi Center (or whatever its called now) or Holiday or Leisure rinks ? They are jammed packed from early morning hours until 1am. And they are not just open during the winter, these rinks are open year round.
As long as they dress up the exterior nice and have retail or restaurants on the 1st floor, I think a couple rinks on the upper floors would be a fantastic idea. I'm picturing a sports themed restaurant and a hockey pro shop or even a small outdoor shop combination...sharpen your skates, or get some bait.
It brings people downtown throughout the entire day. From hockey moms taking pee wees after school, to college games and practices and beer league games late night, there would be constant activity downtown throughout the evening hours, something office space does not bring.
Families stepping out from practice walking aorund at canalside, beer leaguers stepping out at 10pm looking for a nightcap at the bars near cobblestone, local and visiting college kids attending games, you're bringing multiple types of people downtown for extended periods.
We've got plenty of buildings that can be renovated for office space, lofts or hotel rooms. If they do it up nice and it doesn't look like a barn, I say the hockey rinks are the right idea.
Your entire comment made me tingle all over. Hockey isn't basketball being played on some courts at public parks. It is expensive. It would attract money. All the things you said are right on. Hockey moms in town for a tournament staying at the Donovan's hotel will be looking for somewhere to shop in the hour between tournament games. Bar leaguers will want beverages at 2 am after their games. Constant activity. Even in the summer when lots of rinks shut down. Not to mention since Reid's closed where do you get hockey equipment from? Great Skate blows! Front Row is expensive and limited. Only other option is internet, so there's a demand for skate shop.
And building a rink doesn't limit design. A rink doesn't have to be built on the ground floor. You could put a rink over a water park.
I'd prefer it built somewhere else, like one of the dozens of vacant BLOCKS in the area. But if Pegula wants it, give it to him! He'll do a world class job, and the rest of us will just cruise on his coat-tails.
Could one of the rinks be developed to also serve as a concert hall ? Bigger then Shea's but smaller then Fnc . A lot of concerts pass Buffalo by because we don't have that size arena.
Everything said in the comments of this article is pure specualtion.
We have a mere sentence about each proposal with which to judge. I say that we reserve judgement until the 3 plans are unveiled.
With that said, it begs the obvious question, which should have been answered in the original article: When will the plans be presented to the public?
I agree !!!
I want renderings and I want them now !!
My suggestion would be 2 rinks..1 above the other. Make the feature rink able to seat 5,000 people. This would also make a great venue for concerts where 3000 seat Kleinhans or Sheas would be to small.
Upset that we did not receive ideas from "outsiders".
I just linked somewhere else in this thread the Penn State plans that has that type of overlap, with 1 rink being under the other one.
I also wonder how the outside will look, they could build it similar to the one in Ann Arbor, the Yost Ice Arena was built in 1923. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yost_Ice_Arena
The Sabres idea has many reasons why it makes sense. However, I don't think it fits.
We need for mixed-use development like Paladino's idea downtown. I honestly believe that a big rink would be ugly and would be one giant behemoth with not enough activity on the street level that we just don't need anymore of. Let Terry build it somewhere else close.
Here's an idea that you'll all hate - how about knocking down some grain elevators and putting it somewhere near Ganson or Ohio Street? That land is all wasted with those atrocities on them. I consider myself a history lover and I believe in preservation but we don't need so many deplorable grain elevators taking up prime waterfront. Let's keep 2 or 3 and ditch the rest.
Build Carl's proposal and call it a day.
Paladino is already sitting on the Riverfront land between Riverfest and Father Conway Park, and the old Harbor Inn location.
He is also holding an empty parking lot on Court St. (for this so called, 'Court Street Tower' that after years of talk is still a parking lot.) Still holding on the old Creamery Building, Greystone is taking for ever (anyone notice any progress lately?, I haven't). And his so called 'progress' for downtown buildings include first floor activity for 'Parole Office', 'Drug Addiction Center', 'Public Assistance', and other 'assistant offices' that do not bring the right vibe to Main Street. He could have worked with retail and restaurants like he does for his suburban projects, but no, he went with the lowest of the low for our city center. BOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
Totally agree. Paladino should finish his other projects before he even thinks of doing something at Canalside.
It's a shame he has even submitted a proposal, as he will now be in a position to find a way to block the award to someone else.
Yeah, I know. But while I think a behemoth arena fits over there, it's too far from all the action to work for mixed-use development.
I would really like to see something done with the shores of the Buffalo River. It's a damn shame that the river has been neglected all these years. I'm hoping that along with the recent cleanup of it will come a new appreciation for it and the land along its banks.
Carl wants the parking, building may never happen
I like the Sabres proposal. Buffalo is already doing a good job of drawing residential projects downtown, there are several hotel projects in the works, and plenty of open office space and buildings to make office space. Buffalo needs to draw people downtown that do not live there. The Sabres proposal will draw fans and athletes from college hockey to downtown. Youth hockey tournaments draw people from the suburbs and out of town that spend lots of $ on food hotels and entertainment while they are in town. I have been to youth hockey tournaments at Northtowns, Hyde park in Niagara Falls and Niagara U and few of these families head to Buffalo to spend $. This proposal would work to help better Buffalo by exposing new people to the city the other proposals are great but are working elsewhere in the city This seems to be the right location, place and development group.
We've been relying on projects to draw people to visit downtown for years and it's done nothing.
We need to have enough residences down there as possible. The only way to revive downtown is to get people to actually LIVE downtown. Once people live there, businesses will move in to support them.
The biggest thing people look for when deciding what business to frequent is convenience. It's not convenient for anyone who lives in Amherst to frequent a business downtown. It really would only be convenient for people who live there.
Again, get people to LIVE downtown.
Great point, people need to be living downtown. We need the parking lots right next to the Cobblestone district to be full of residences. This is the only way Canalside will have the type of 24/7 draw we need.
What I'm talking about is building a thriving area that has action all the time. Hell, tourists come from other cities just to see Elmwood. We don't need a silver bullet we need a thriving neighborhood. The only differences here are that the residents will be living in highrises and there will be the bonus of having all the canalside attractions.
By the way genius, a residence doesn't mean a single-family home. It can be an apartment on the 15th floor of Paladino's proposed building.
I don't think I've ever seen someone get more fired up for being agreed with?
Come on down to the Delaware North Restaurant!! Get your hotdogs from a rolling machine and nachos with cheese ooze! Oh, and we serve Labbatt too!! Can't wait til this place.....opens ****BARF***
I say demolish the skyway access ramp and build at the periphery of Canalside first...the area closest to downtown, closest to South Buffalo (the Casino and south or east of the Casino).
Why?
As Canalside develops and becomes a destination, increasingly better opportunities will come up to use the prime real estate closest to that destination. If its already built then game over. It will never get proposed.
Paladino atleast offers the most flexibility and thats smart.
But I say build it further away from Canalside...and reserve the area closest to the canal for development last.
Whatever they end up putting in, I hope they have the sense to build an underground parking lot to go with it.
I think the Sabres proposal would provide some seasonal balance to the intrinsic warm-weather attractions of Canalside. Piggyback off of the hockey activity and identity already present and keep people down there all year (especially on non-game days). It would tie together the two areas, maybe Liberty-Hound does better in the winter months and Cobblestone district picks up a bit in the summer and you get some more cohesion to the whole area.
I am against the rink. All it will lead to is people driving in from the suburbs, going to the rink, and driving home. Carl's proposal makes much more sense long term. Like someone above said, we need more people living (or staying in hotels) downtown. This is more important than an ice rink.
I think the rink would be a good fit. I could drop off the kids, do some shopping and grab lunch (all in the area)while they are practicing. Ice time is in high demand in WNY. This would bring people there 7 days a week.
I disagree I believe it is the changes to downtown like a stronger theater and arts Thursday at the Sq. Farmers Market more jobs etc. which have made it a place people want to live and it builds from there. I'm not saying don't do residential projects yes we need them but we also need to draw more people to Buffalo. I am from the suburbs years ago I only came downtown for Sports and concerts, now those reasons plus to eat, the Erie basin marina the Naval park, Larkin Sq. events and place that were not there before and I would love to now move downtown someday after my children are out of school. Because of the city fabric not because someone converted an old building into an apartment. Great build residential but also continue to draw new people make the city the center of the region not just a area within the region.
A rink complex could compliment the outdoor rinks on the proposed canals at the Aud site and the FN Arena next door. It would establish some hockey "synergy" and it creates all-season activity for a location that will sorely need it. It begins to brand the waterfront as a prominent destination for ice hockey for both locals as well as a national audience especially if the rink complex has a public-ness that works and creates a relationship between the interior and exterior (memo to pegula - hire good, scratch that, hire GREAT architects).
However, it needs to move far beyond that singular use and become a real mixed use project with a hotel and residences above. It will need to continuously engage the street on all side - sports bar, restuarant, Sabres or NHL store, other shops, public atrium, whatever. It needs the density that combining these proposals will bring. A couple rinks with a restaurant will not cut it and will not be the kick in the pants necessary for Canalside to actually lift off. And i wouldn't spread these proposals thin and assume you can just plant Paladino's proposal next door. The waterfront needs a major anchor, an activity center that will spur more activity... pull the proposals together, and that could do it...it's the real Hockeytown.
This ice rink idea is no different from the other silver bullet ideas that have failed. Think the Metro Rail, the convention center or the Main Place mall. I feel like people are forgetting about how important mixed-use development is because they have a soft-spot for the Sabres.
Build the damned rink somewhere else.
Um, not really. The Sabres need a practice rink and are going to build one. Here or in Clarence or wherever. The spin-offs being discussed aren't a hail mary like the things you mentioned, they're realistic spin-offs with little downside resulting from PRIVATE INVESTMENT!
I'd prefer it not put on this prime spot either, but I'd also prefer to keep in Pegula's favor. Perhaps if the City discussed this with him. However, this is a City owned parcel. Who owns those other possible lots? Croce owns one or two right? Those might not be as easy to acquire and build on.
I'm happy that Terry wants to build a rink I just don't want it there - I'm happy we agree on that.
I don't know who owns those lots and I understand that a city owned lot is easier to acquire for obvious reasons. However, it doesn't mean we all should suffer as a whole by building a behemoth ice rink in what should be a pedestrian-friendly block.
Ok, I exaggerated when I compared it to those other projects but I just see the rink as a bad idea for the reasons that I've mentioned.
No Build the Mix use everywhere else. This is the spot for the rink plan. No not a silver bullet just a piece to draw new people downtown. What would I would love to see is to add The Paladino/Ellicott Development proposal above the sabres plan do both.
How are Carls 2 dozen apt dwellers going to contibute? There already is an office building right there with 1500+ people working in it. Does it make a big difference?
Put Pegulas Rink in the sea of parking lots on Perry street, either on the south side towards the water, or aquire some of the land next to the HSBC atrium in the Buffalo News lot. Canalside is happening, but Cobblestone Dist needs an anchor. Honestly, if you were visiting Buffalo you would want to walk out of your hotel to where the action is, not have to take a cab there. That is why Carl's mixed use with hotel makes the most sense. Plus, people who travel there for hockey will drive into the underground ramp, go through ramp elevator to the rink, and not even step a foot outside
"Plus, people who travel there for hockey will drive into the underground ramp, go through ramp elevator to the rink, and not even step a foot outside"
Def valid points, but if Canalside becomes an attractive I could see parents dropping little Johnny son of a bitch off at hockey practice and hitting up Canalside for a couple beers.
i say sell this f$%^&*g lot to the highest bidder and let the new owner decide what he wants to put on it the end !! then maybe somthing would happen there.
He's baaaaaack.
Been busy working on your "Sagrada Familia"? You should hang out with my buddy's father. His dad started remodeling their kitchen when I left for the Army. Four and a half years later when I got out, he still wasn't finished.
The BR article says the Sabres plan is rinks + sports bar/restaurant. The link to the Fink Business First article says rinks + HOTEL.
The Fink article was modified 8 hours after the BR article was posted, that could account for the discrepancy.
Rinks + HOTEL seems like a really good choice there. Office space can really go anywhere (like Paladino's Court Street lot).
Sources said the Sabres are proposing to construct a pair of hockey rinks, one with seating for a couple hundred of spectators and the other with perhaps as much seating for 1,500 people. The rinks would be used by local groups, hockey organization and skating groups. The NHL team may occasionally use one of the rinks if First Niagara Center is booked with a concert, lacrosse game or other special event.
The project would also include a full-service, nationally-branded hotel, a 1,000 car parking facility and some streetscape retail along Main and Perry streets.
Paladino has offered to construct a 700,000-square-foot, 12-story mixed use project that would house a 140-room brand name hotel, 42 upscale, market-rate apartments and 110,000-square-feet of Class A office space.
First floor retail and restaurants are proposed along Main, Scott and Perry streets.
Pegula for the win.
I said wait for more details. Here are a few more details:
"Sources said the Sabres are proposing to construct a pair of hockey rinks, one with seating for a couple hundred of spectators and the other with perhaps as much seating for 1,500 people. The rinks would be used by local groups, hockey organization and skating groups. The NHL team may occasionally use one of the rinks if First Niagara Center is booked with a concert, lacrosse game or other special event.
The project would also include a full-service, nationally-branded hotel, a 1,000 car parking facility and some streetscape retail along Main and Perry streets."
http://www.bizjournals.com/buffalo/news/2012/06/20/mayor-pleased-with-webster-development.html
Pegula's proposal now includes a hotel and retail on Main and Perry. Also, 1,000 parking spaces. This would completely solve the parking for Canalside issue. Also, it will greatly help parking for Sabres games.
Also, I trust Pegula to get this done quickly far more than I trust Paladino.
Additionally, if we are looking to attract people to Canalside, additional attractions will certainly help. The hockey rinks will bring people down there in off hours far more than additional office space (which we can put anywhere downtown (court street??))
In Pegula we trust. Now let’s see the renderings.
NCAA requirements for all new D1 facilities for mens hockey is minimum 4-5k seating capacity. Perhaps there could be a waiver, but I'm sure getting college hockey there is a consideration(and canisius better be working on being included, or else they'll be left in the dust).
I'm sure the Sabres would conduct most of their practices in the practice facility, if not all, whether or not the main pad is booked.
Also, I'd be curious about a hotel so closely affiliated with the Sabres. Do visiting teams stay there?
Agree on Pegula getting it done. Don't forget he would put together a better end product than Paladino, would probably be more receptive of outsiders input re: impact on the area, and would overindulge - not skimp - if anything.
Pegula has the money to essentially play sim city down there. He is taking losses on the Sabres just to make the team more desirable for good players.
He also doesn't need to please investors looking for immediate ROI. He can afford to take a longer view, since he could probably pay for this out of his own pocket without even noticing it (his wallet) was lighter afterwards.
I really have faith the Pegula would put together a good project and that he would, most importantly, get it done in a timely manner.
With this and the Donovan reno as first steps, I think Canalside will become a much easier sell for Benderson.
While I'd prefer this land go towards something else, and the practice facility be put somewhere east of the arena, it could be good in pushing development outside the immediate area. Looking at an overhead, taking this and the Donovan out of the equation leaves the Aud block and the space the Sabres just paid to sod that are in play. Maybe that would help force development of the DL&W?
TULLY I DO MORE IN ONE DAY THAN YOU DO IN A WEEK !!!
My concern with this is really about the first floor. It should add to the street activity, not just used up by an indoor rink. If the sabres can design it so that the exterior first floor is mostly outward-facing retail then it would be great with rinks and hotel inside.
Valid concern. Make sure it's voiced if the opportunity is there.
However, there is no reason a multi-rink facility equates to a dead zone streetside.
Kettler Capitals Iceplex
http://kettlercapitals.pointstreaksites.com/view/kettlercapitals/contact-us/about-88
located above the Ballston Common Mall
Mayor pleased with Webster development bids
Someone else asked ,'why can't they BOTH build on canalside'? ....why not? Or better yet, why can't Paladino build this mixed-use building on his empty Court Street lot? A 24/7 building is needed on that block!
Expand the Greenspace for the time to rid the parking lot eyesore to the Webster Block so in the interim it can be used for pre game parties and/or for recreation. There is no reason to rush and you cannot go wrong with extending the park environment. There is plenty of parking behind the Atrium and up and down Perry and into Exchange areas.
Focus on filling in the Aud hole first and utilization of some of the vacant store fronts on lower Main and maybe the Tower.
Build the rinks/hotel in Cobblestone in one of the lots there. You already have a bar district there and streets that run through nothing but a parking lot. Besides I thought we could skate on the replica canals - be good for i.e. the pond hockey tourney.
Building more class A office space is foolish until the Tower fate is known.
Besides, I thought the area was not ready for more lofts, i.e. the creamery building.....
So Donovan gets done, Webster block is built out, the Aud block has whatever on it, and development starts pushing east.
After reading Mike N's comment I was thinking about losing this parking lot, because it is always packed for any FNC event. So capacity is pushed elsewhere. What is the affect on exfil from the area? Particularly once those empty blocks to the east begin getting developed (fingers crossed) and parking becomes more congested(perhaps?). It's already tough to get out of Dodge after games or events (which should be a good thing for the businesses there/that will be there).
Will parking lots/garages further away be more utilized? Is the NFTA prepared to handle more people taking the train to the game?
LouisTully... You don't spend $100 million (envelope calculation of entire project) creating a beautiful oasis to border it with a 300 parking spot eyesore. Those 300 spots will just have to be absorbed elsewhere and other spaces used more efficiently. I know there is plenty of space during office hours.
You also don't want to cut off the harbor access to the natural beauty of the area i.e. Wintergarden, Rainbow Mall Niagara Falls with an expansive high rise. Buffalo is generally a low rise city, and the canal days would certainly have been. Replacing the pavement with grass does two things.
1) Cleans up the border to the park while maintaining shovel readiness in the event that development space is one day needed. I must add the lots behind the Marine Drive Apartments need a good refurb as well
2) Allows you to prioritize other parcels that should be developed first(AUD)and keeps development for the sake of development and costly blunders down. Visit Toronto's waterfront, look at St. James Park in London.... a shallow pool with wildlife in the heart of downtown would be pretty cool especially since god only knows what is in the Buffalo River.
I'd even take a field to go kick a soccer ball around or throw a frisbee without having to worry about tripping over someone playing Twister or sunning themselves in an Miami color scheme inspired adirondack chair over a theme bar or empty office space.
As residential units are added up Main Street, maybe in the Tower, the Creamery building, these green areas will be used and be attractive to residents and employees who continue to work downtown. It adds to the quality of life that downtown is able to offer to rival with suburban offerings.
In fact, they could never put another building there. If people are hungry, head up Main street or Washington or Pearl. If people want a beer go to the Cobblestone district or Chippewa. The idea is to lure and disperse, not create a waterfront Casino. Having everything on site does allow us to support all the new initiatives currently underway.
"parcels that should be developed first(AUD)"
They are working on the building the replica canals on the Aud block right now. No other development can take place there until that project is completed. (1 year?)
Other parcels are either grass or parking lots. Those could start tomorrow.
Sorry 300 miles but there is no other development interest. 3 proposals for a supposedly prime real estate block. I suppose everyone else is just waiting for the Aud block next year as you say.
I am not against a rink. I am against a rink in that location. As I said put it in Cobblestone; Plenty of space, nearby and restaurant with other restaurants. How much development has Leisure or Holiday brought to the surrounding neighborhoods. Not much has changed since I stopped playing there 15 years ago; in fact for the 10 years I did play there they barely fixed their own buildings.
As far as the Paladino proposal, take care of the Creamery eyesore before building anymore residential within that area- yes you can see that from the harbor. Also, more office space to sit vacant with the Tower future unknown makes no sense either.
Wow, all my spouting stands corrected. Mike Gilbert says it won't be a practice facility for the team. Interesting considering most teams have a dedicated practice facility. I'm curious since Pegula is creating "hockey heaven"
They both sound like good prospects for the Webster block without seeing any sort of renderings, etc...a lot of the comments here are based on speculation of what these projects would actually look like.
Here's the kicker though: Paladino's project includes 110K sq. ft. of Class A office space...right near a Class A tower that's losing its tenants one by one. If he follows up with a specific anchoring tenant and maybe the names of some potential retailers his plan would be more sound. That's why mixed used reuse plans like the Donovan, Avant & Hotel Lafayette projects have been working out: there are already some names attached when the projects get started.
That being said, I'm pleased with both proposals for the time being and can't wait to see more details...including about the third 'conceptual' proposal.
Figure a way to merge the Sabres and Ellicott proposals together and get the architect group in to make all that work and design it! Best of all worlds and evereyone happy and downtown ends up in a more substantial project! Crazy wishful thinking of course but could be interesting for sure. Maybe the hockey rinks are elevated on a 3rd or 4th floor with large sidewall in glass windows with panoramic views of the harbor area. Seating on three other sides of rinks all oriented towards rinks and that view! That would be interesting. The hotel, office, commecial, parking all workied ito the structure above, below, to the sides, whatever makes it a truly mixed use destination with walk up commercial at ground level.
Both are great proposals...laughable to mention the third "conceptual" idea..lol..doesn't even seem likes its reach the daydreaming stage yet.
Neither of these HAVE to go on this particular block, both would do well in the immediate area. Its comes down to trust.
We all love Pegula..hes got a ton of money..really nice guy. An acquisition like this makes TONS OF BUSINESS SENSE as far as his investment. He would have this going next month..this wouldn't be a buy and hold for him, nor would it be devoted to parking. He's not in the parking business.
Think for a 2nd that good old "buy and hold Paladino" couldn't have built his building anywhere else in the immediate area. (Creamery included) Or why he hasn't done so already? Casino development and the emptying of the HSBC tower? I am sure there are a thousand other places in that immediate area he could have already built..but chose not too? He just wants this lot cause you can charge $30 a car for parking.
Please pay attention NFTA...refurbish the DL&W terminal...couldn't think of a better time to dust off your South Park metro extension.
At risk of owning yet another negative comment post, scrapping all of the proposals and returning the parking lot pavement to green space for recreation is in my opinion the best development option currently.
Putting an empty building on a piece of land is not development. Waiting 10-15 yrs for someone to actually build the building is wasteful.
Putting a building with all amenities, food, parking, rink is the same as a casino. A casino concept by a different name.
1) Events can be held on this parcel but at the sametime not encroach on other's ability to actually use and enjoy the waterfront especially with the Skyway still being there.
You can have more room for multiple events and even more people.
- you could have a permanent Hot Air balloon there all summer providing elevated views of the city as is being done this weekend for Citybration (great chance to view the Creamery), or playoff parties with a big screen or Friday night movies etc. Remember the "sole purpose of the Sabres existence is to win the Stanley Cup"; should provide for a lot of playoff games..... (a little sarcasm to secure my negative rating)
- provide ample space for additional vendors to move them off the boardwalk and views of the water. Reduce wear and tear of large trucks constantly driving up and onto the paved areas of the harbor
- in winter create sledding hills or host a winterfest
2) Financially, the city should sit and hold this property or risk losing substantial value of the prime parcel should Canalside take off. Selling now seems to me to be restricting the amount the city could receive in the future by holding off for a few years which then can be put into further development.
We need to stop just doing things to say we've done something which in reality that something is nothing but a waste of valuable scarce resources. A lot of time and effort has been spent undoing poor planning already, i.e. exploding canal rocks.... lets take the time to do it right and use the energy of the population to build something, not undo something. This is city land, not private land. Lets do what's best for the people not 1 or 2 already wealthy individuals.
"At risk of owning yet another negative comment post, scrapping all of the proposals and returning the parking lot pavement to green space for recreation is in my opinion the best development option currently"
Who the F* is going to drive to the Webster block to hang out of a piece of green space? Get real.
Up and Coming- What I am advocating is that none of the proposals are acceptable or feasible. Neither is leaving the eye sore of the parking lot that is currently there detracting from the $ thats been poured into the area.
Putting a rink there is unintelligent and not the economic engine. Putting in a hotel or office space also at this moment probably unintelligent until you see the success of the hotel already slated there and have absorbed the office space in the tower, Lytle and Consulate at minimum. Oh and most of lower Main. I would rather have the lawn for the next couple of years then another building with For RENT signs in the lower window or a rink that people will not leave.
So in the interim, get rid of the lot and put grass leaving the site shovel ready but giving you flexibility of usage down at the harbor for hosting additional various activities summer, fall, winter, spring. Flexibility is the key. You can always pull up the grass. Not as easy with a building.
"So in the interim, get rid of the lot and put grass leaving the site shovel ready but giving you flexibility of usage down at the harbor for hosting additional various activities summer, fall, winter, spring. Flexibility is the key. You can always pull up the grass. Not as easy with a building."
Do you really think both projects would include hotel space if it wasn't economically viable? Also, if you know anything about amateur/rec league hockey, you'd know that it's extremely difficult to find rink time. Put the rinks in, bring the players down and when they're done playing let them walk to canalside for a beer and some chicken wings.
Chicken wings from where? They will pull in the ramp, go up the stairs/elevator, hit the locker room, ice time, maybe hit up the theme restaurant and then leave having never seen outside the complex, heading right out the 190s or 190n or skyway.
And yes I know quite a lot about amateur hockey having grown up playing it for 17 odd years. I point to the development surrounding the former Sabreland, Cazenovia, Leisure, Holiday, Hyde Park, North Buffalo (I've played in all of them) or even the new rink in East Aurora, Pepsi Center. There is no spin off development from these rinks. Restaurant/snack bar in the rink, pro shop in the rink. Again, not against a rink, against a rink on the Webster Block- this is the key point I think you miss.
And honestly if they want to get Chicken Wings then it would be even closer walking distance where there are restaurants already in the area. In Cobblestone.
And to your last point hotel. Well the hotel is un named. There may or may not be a hotel interested. I'm sure Benderson, Uniland etc could've said hotel as well- They did not. That being said, we perhaps have an office tower nearby with a parking ramp that may need more tenancy based on Lytle going to Canalside One and the Canadian Consulate closing. Building already exists and within the same proximity and will have prime views of the city and lake.
My point is this- The ideas are boring, old hat and/or unfit for the particular site. Its mediocre and not worth doing, again, on that particular site.
You're comparing Sabreland, Hyde Park, or Leisure - and their respective surroundings - with the proposal we have yet to see renderings or details of? Apples and oranges. Or, rather, apples and donkeys.
A multi-surface arena, restaurant, hotel, garage combo is "old hat" for the area? What similar developments would you point to?
The arguments you're making seem to infer that a rink wouldn't be successful anywhere in this area; however you say you're not against a rink, just against this unelaborated proposal on this block. Moving two blocks over would make the difference?
I did not say the rink would be unsuccessful. But the same reasons it wil be successful (shortage of ice) it would also be successful in Cobblestone. Canalside location is not what would make the rink successful or unsuccessful.
What I have said is while the rink may be successful, it will not drive development in and around the area. Again, if everything is in one spot, parking, hotel, rink people will not leave. It is no different than a casino that provides you with everything you need so you keep pulling the lever.
And yes the concept is boring expecially for a project that is costing upwards of $100 million or more in the surrounding area.
Costa are not a factor because it's private development. Also, you forget about parents dropping there kids off for hockey games/practice/tournaments. Plus take into consideration how many people from the Suburbs it would draw who may never have frequented the area otherwise. I say Pegula's proposal is by far the best. Also, Carl has how many other projects he's "trying" to get done? If he gets this one I bet it takes 6 years for it to be built and would probably mean The Greystone and other projects are put on hold. Plus, it would be a big PR slap in the face if Paladino got it, but it would be interesting to see all the "I didn't get the Webster Block and I'm mad as he'll" bumper stickers.
Byron Brown's top priority in this situation should be to woo Terry Pegula.
If he gave $#*&ing Terrell Owens a key to the city then he should at least give Terry Pegula this block.
wrong paragraph......
*"Putting a rink there is unintelligent and not the economic engine. Putting in a hotel or office space also at this moment probably unintelligent until you see the success of the hotel already slated there"
News flash, there is already plenty of placemake'd, crowdsourced green space across the street at Canalside. At some point *something* needs to be built in or around Canalside.
I know that it is a fine and dandy to sit on a lawn chair and look at the water, but there is barely anything to do in that district. You say the hockey players won't patronize anywhere else, well there isn't much to partonize to begin with.
If you build the necessary amenities for people to enjoy, there won't be any worry of wasting a prime spot for a winter sledding hill. You kidding me?
Costrander08, I am aware of the amount of greenspace down there. However, to me the proposals are not acceptable and its obvious nothing worthwhile for that parcel is soon to be forthcoming as all the other developers put nothing forward combined with the current uncertainties facing the tower and the like. A rink can be put anywhere in the nearby locations and still do well and I don't want another vacant building. Paladino has already acknowledged office space/retail may be sketchy.
However, the parking lot there is an eyesore. So as a TEMPORARY SOLUTION I am saying get rid of the lot, green it up, use it for hosting Sabres pre game parties, NHL promotions, or move the concerts there to be still at the harbor but not close down access for 2 days (There are multiple weekends that the Harbor will be closed for concerts and not the free Thursday ones) and/or save the wear and tear on the harbor until something better comes along. Also the use on the current green space is limited ie. for hot air balloons with the Skyway directly above. Get people used to walking from outside of the immediate vacinity past areas that are developing and could develop further. More people that walk past Cobblestone area, up Pearl Street more potential to make these areas more viable.
As I've said before its an interim solution that has flexibility and allows for creative uses, (yes sledding hills were just one idea) ie. multiple events going on at a single time or activities that may require free airspace directly above it. By all means develop the site, but lets not do it in typical short sighted Buffalo fashion....
mike>"green it up, use it for hosting Sabres pre game parties, NHL promotions, or move the concerts there to be still at the harbor but not close down access for 2 days (There are multiple weekends that the Harbor will be closed for concerts and not the free Thursday ones) and/or save the wear and tear on the harbor until something better comes along. Also the use on the current green space is limited ie. for hot air balloons with the Skyway directly above."
Except for the ballon rides (if Skyway would interfere with those), I don't see why all other very-occasional event examples you gave couldn't just as well be on parcels across Main St due west of FNC/arena and south of Perry St. I think one such parcel is owned by ECHDC as part of official "Canalside" and another to its north is city-owned (being landscaped using Pegula's donation). Those are shaded green and grey, respectively, in diagram on page 4 here
http://www.eriecanalharbor.com/pdf/MuseumOperatorRFP.pdf
Your previous comment's premise that if Webster is withheld from any development for now that some day development in Canalside will "take off" and thus motivate better proposals for Webster sounds very iffy.
It's possible your prediction would happen of course, but it there really a lot of reason to expect it?
The only plans for sure on those are the govt-owned public market and govt-owned childrens museum. What are good reasons to espect those two things will substantially grow private sector interest in developing around there?
"Three of the areas' biggest developers took a pass." Commentary enough for me to finally accept that Buffalo is not Boston or NYC. The Webster Block was marketed nationally and only garnered three responses? Let's all keep that in the back of our minds as new development opportunities are proposed in the region.
i would stay clear of paladino with his track record. Pegula is not really a developer tho either. I'm inclined to say go with Pegula since his idea might be the lesser of the two evils but without more deails on what this building would look like and what else it would have than rinks and a restaurant i'm not on board. If this is simply just a pepsi center then that will be a waste of the spot. Even if people were down there all the time using the ice, thats all that they will do or parents from the northtowns would just ship their kids down on the subway to avoid driving them. Maybe with pegula's money he can get a big name developer to come in with some clout that will get some national chains. Ideally the site would be a combination of pegula's idea of rinks and then get a different developer to get a hotel, retail and some housing in there. Something that might be an interesting fit would be the comedy hall of fame. Would be a nice addition to the area, give people more things to do before or after a sabres game or other events at fnc.
"i would stay clear of paladino with his track record. Pegula is not really a developer tho either."
Pegula's a business man with lots of money who knows how to get things done, that right there trumps everything else.
Exactly. I was walking through the Concert area watching things get set up.
Pizza vendors, beer vendors, barbeque vendors just to name a few. They set up the trucks and when the event is over pack it up. Its not limited to the concert series. The Tower has a cafeteria, a Starbucks, a Subway, Just Pizza, Timmies; people do not leave the building. Just as people do not have to leave Tower for lunch, they don't have to after the concert series go find something to eat down Perry, up Pearl, etc.
They just walk over to the Webster block (which is empty on the few weekends I've been down there) and get in their cars and move on. But if you get rid of that lot it would force people to park up in Pearl, Exchange, take the rail up Main St, Cobblestone and have to walk past established restaurants. This includes Sabres games.
There is no need or incentive for people go off and vote with their feet for a restaurant here or there because we deliver it to them on a silver platter.
You need to focus on residential first; fortunately which is happening in a variety of areas. Use the area to draw people down to live or play but afterwords out and about and support the assets of what we already have; Lafayette, Statler, Chippewa etc etc. and hopefully remove some of the blight in terms of these paved lots.
Not everyone wants to eat a stale slice of pizza or a hotdog while they're down there on an event night. In fact after last Thursdays concert my GF and I walked over to Templeton Landing for a proper meal. I don't think a few mobile food vendors will prohibit B&M restaurants from being successful or even a draw.
Am I missing something here? The rendering of the Paladino proposal indicates something akin to a bomb shelter or a flak tower on the corner of Main and Perry. That seems to have escaped notice.
Go Sabres.
You must hang out in some really nice bomb shelters.
To me it resembles lofts.
http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article915930.ece/BINARY/w620/WEBSTER_BLOCK_3_9361834.JPG
If Paladino 'can' do something this great on the waterfront, then why the hell can't he do the same for his other city developments??????? Instead of plopping a parol office, drug addiction and other social service offices along the first floors in his main street buidlings, why not retail and restaurants???? And by the way, how's that 'Court Street Tower' coming along, looks great so far (still an empty parking lot!).
A rink is by far the best idea. It would draw families into the city for hockey practice, games, tournaments, etc. This along with the other nearby proposals would draw many people into the city and allow them to spend some time their and spend their money. We already have empty office buildings, etc, an ice rink is a new idea and I believe a good one. While some may argue about the location, I think it is great because it will draw people right to canalside, and not two blocks away.
"an ice rink is a new idea"
I dunno, Tom. There are those that say it is "old hat" and "boring". Though, they didn't provide an example of anything similar. Except Hyde Park and Sabreland, which is like comparing Buff State Bengals Football with the New England Patriots.
Haha yes exactly. The biggest question to me when looking at all of these proposals is: Will they draw people downtown? And the obvious answer to the two proposals of this article is that Paladino's will not draw any new people downtown and the Ice rink will.
Location location location. I am not against the rink I am against the rink in that location- If you read the comments above, I am simply stating that it should go down the block in another location. It does not fit the Canalside theme.
And I am stating that it is not a harbinger of economic development hence the examples of Hyde Park, Sabreland.
I quote you above LouisTully.... "
I hate the thought that something is better than nothing but I'm a little ambivalent here.
OR
While I'd prefer this land go towards something else, and the practice facility be put somewhere east of the arena,
Seems to me you want just something there...Anything. All I am advocating is to give it time, let the sites underway develop, and get more proposals. Neither of the proposals makes Buffalo unique or anymore attractive to any other Rust Belt City or any city in general. AS lot of time and effort has been put into this project already to get things done right, like a real commercial slip and not a knock off. Until we stop acting like the pimply faced kid looking for a prom date, we will not take home the prom queen.
With all due respect to Ellicott Development, I would have to say the rendering is uninspiring at best. Paladino has even put a caveat on the proposal. If the downtown office market does not meet (his) expectations he may eliminate the office component. That shoots a big hole in the proposal right there. What you have left , as an anchor, are 40+ apts and a small hotel. Also I wonder about his plan to split the block in two. Could he fulfill the award requirements by building out one of the blocks and then sitting on the other?
The Sabres proposal is nothing more than more deadspace for prime canalside real estate.
If the Sabres want to expand into smaller rinks then let them do it to the east closer to ECC downtown campus.
I say dont build anything on the most prime parts of canalside but only offer the periphery. As Canalside gets built up it will get more expensive and better ideas will come forward....but if that land is already built on then the mediocre and desperate already be built on it.
So a potential developer isn't going to go into the area if it is attractive because the "prime" spots are taken? Or will it possibly lead to density and mass as the desolate land to the east becomes suddenly desirable because it is in proximity to the vibrant area? I got it, location is important. But so is having a reason to desire that location. It's like waiting to see who jumps into the pool first.
Pegula has bucks. He suddenly wants to dip his toe into development. Let's whet his pallet.
You're right, let's just keep waiting.....and waiting.............and waiting......................and waiting.......................................and waiting..............................................................and waiting.
lets walk before we can run
Jeff Nixon of the Bills likes Fandemoneum - a restaurant at the foot of the One Canalside / Donovan Building..
watch the video and see for yourself, then donate your memorabilia (on loan)
Great idea........getting the fans involved in donating memorabilia, rotating exhibits, using a dormant tavern and reassembling it, utilizing the old Donovan building, connecting it to the downtown corridor, the tailgate experience....... What's not to like!
Jeff Nixon - Buffalo Bills Alum
Enjoy the video:
Michael: That's pretty awesome but how realistic is it? Have you spoken with Benderson? Are they on board? The idea is pretty great and long overdue, if done right.
ok, I cam home in 2009, have now moved into the lafayette, so my investment is personal and business - my proposal Fandemoneum Restuarant / Museum - - presented to Benderson with positive response - here is my video - please enjoy and share it.
It's a local, home-grown, genuine joint with a corner tavern, tailgate party, good food, event space capability and it pays for itself (even makes money) and it's all about YOU, THE FAN!
JOIN IN AND PROMOTE IF YOU CARE TO..
THANKS
Yes, Newell,
I'm building the package with the answers you requested..
by the way: a quote from Jeff Nixon - Jeff is asking the Bills Alum to hear my presentation.
I think this operation will have one of Bufflo's best managers, TBD, but there is always good talent that is not delighted in any current role.
The momentum from Canalside cannot be denied.
This can align with and cross-promote Webster Block / Sabres idea.
Daily estimated revenue: avg. $6k with as much as $20k on a great / special event occasion, I am putting $200k of my own money and will seek individual / corp. sponsor for an average of $50k ea, with potentially one primary exclusive corp. sponsor at $200k to $500k with potential naming rights (like Labatts, Tim Hortons, Rich's, or Sabres, Bills)
The law firm and the hotel (Marriott) will easily pay the bills and the local and visiting fans with alignment / partnership to Bisons, Sabres, Canalside, Cobblestone well.. it could be HUGE.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




I'm a little surprised by WCP's negative spin.
Why would City Hall be especially surprised or disappointed at that set of 3 proposals? The first two of them were widely expected. Only one can be built. Without knowing more about the 3rd, not much can be said about that.
My quick knee jerk reaction is that the Sabres thing sounds best. That would benefit most by Webster's close proximity to the arena and otherwise might not happen or be as successful. Maybe Paladino would end up building his proposal somewhere else downtown or waterfront-ish.
So that would mean one nice project for sure by Pegula/Sabres, and a decent chance of Paladino's too before very long. How is this in any way bad news?
For a supposed prime site, so few proposals indicate that developing Canalside will be more challenging and will take much longer. In other words, Lego won't see his Nordstroms or any nationally known entity any time soon. The demographics are still too risky except for local developers who know this area.
What about a lower end Nordstorm's or Tiffany's?
They exist. Ask ChristieLou.
Top it off with a Plantagon and this could be the most silver of all bullets.
You mean the Plantagon that has no funding or business plan?
You're crushing dreams, man. Crushing dreams.
PaulBuff: your comment gets my vote for comment of the day.
I know man, I stay dropping reality bombs like its WWII.
I always assumed that the Plantagon was the 'pied-a-terre,' if you will, of a full-fledged Swedish invasion led by Generalissimo Ingvar, blessed be he.
A plantagon/IKEA? Locally built to the curb furniture? Swedish meatballs? You'll need an allen wrench to disassemble the Gronkulla I'm hiding in my pants.
Paul, 'prime' is a relative term of course. Most sites in Buffalo probably wouldn't get those two serious proposals of these sizes, so by comparison yes Webster seems prime.
As for major national retail like Nordstrom -
I don't know if anybody who's well aware and objective really considers that realistic. Even Jordan Levy seemed to stop publicly talking up that possibility after Ikea embarrassed him with a fast public 'no way' following the Bass Pro pull out when he mentioned them to the media as one of the first calls he planned to make. Then he left ECHDC and his successor new chairman hasn't publicly brought up the major national retailer topic (at least as from what I've noticed).
Has even Lego brought it up on here lately? Maybe your explanations to him finally sunk in!
I don't think it is surprising that there are just 3 or dissapointing, it is probably a foregone conclusion that the Sabres deal is the one, so why bother with the effort. Pegula will put his cash on the table and get the project done.
Boss - if it turns out that's the biggest concern, then City Hall should easily be able to proactively address it with a binding condition on designation of Paladino's co as the preferred developer - such as severe financial penalties or loss of designation if construction (&/or hotel chain affiliation), etc don't happen by some specified date.
By the way, Boss - didn't Paladino's company build most or all of the following hotels they operate?
http://www.ellicottdevelopment.com/portfolio/hotels
I still think the Sabres proposal sounds like the better choice for Webster, but some things people say about Paladino's co don't seem to me to line up with the _totality_ of most buildings/projects in his track record.
http://www.ellicottdevelopment.com/portfolio/commercial/office/
http://www.ellicottdevelopment.com/portfolio/residential/apartments/
http://www.ellicottdevelopment.com/portfolio/commercial/retailplazas/
(… and other stuff too, can browse that website for more. The Creamery & Greystone are two buildings among many they own, and the Court St office building project's languishing seems far from typical for him/them.)
TheBoss>"Pegula and Paladino are two different birds."
True, different personalities and very different business focuses to date.
Pegula's business success has been in in natural gas fracking (which I support) and as far as I know has zero track record in development/operation of commercial buildings such as hotels or retail. That isn't a reason to not choose the Sabres proposal, but just sayin.
Paladino's business success has been in developing & operating mostly commercial building projects like would be on the Webster.
For clarity I should've put my reply there under these other comments from Boss, not that first one of his/hers...
TheBoss>"Paladino would probably "milk" the surface parking as long as possible and building on the site might happen in 10 years or maybe not. The Sabres plan I imagine would be done as fast as feasible. Pegula and Paladino are two different birds."
TheBoss>"Carl wants the parking, building may never happen."