Regional May 16, 2012 2:40 PM

Wrecking WNY: Bethlehem Office Building

Wrecking WNY: Bethlehem Office Building

Demolition crews this week are preparing the Bethlehem Steel North Office Building in Lackawanna for its demise.  Constructed in 1901, the Beaux Arts style building is located on Hamburg Turnpike (Route 5) at the northeast corner of the sprawling 1300-acre former steel plant complex. 

The building, like the city it is located in, has clearly seen better days yet remains defiantly majestic.  It has even been identified as eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.  Though the smoke and fumes produced by steel plant furnaces cleared years ago, the highly visible property close to the waterfront  found no takers.  Crews are currently removing asbestos before starting demolition.

bethlehem-%20old.jpgPreservation Buffalo-Niagara has issued the following statement:

Preservation Buffalo - Niagara is saddened by the news that starting this Friday the former Bethlehem Steel North Office Building, known as the Bethlehem Steel Administration Building, will be demolished. Located along the City of Lackawanna and the City of Buffalo line, the Bethlehem Steel Administration Building has been a Beaux Arts gem welcoming travelers into both cities for decades. Even in its present deteriorated state, the Bethlehem Steel Administration Building hints at our region's grand industrial roots while illustrating our collective great fortune of architectural heritage.

The Bethlehem Steel Administration Building also represents the vital need for a strategic approach to dealing with our region's underutilized, irreplaceable historic assets. An approach that proactively finds solutions to foreseeable problems and that places an emphasis on the social capital embodied in our built environment. An approach that enables community-wide participation in the discussion of what ultimately happens to our historic structures. Without such an approach, our community is destined to lose even more of our built history and with that our fragile connection to our past.

A critical component of this desired approach is Local Historic Landmark designation.  Local landmark designation insures the opportunity for meaningful public input and protects the interest of the public in preserving the collective community heritage.

Preservation Buffalo - Niagara further believes that it is imperative to protect the integrity of historic resources to insure their eligibility for lucrative historic preservation grants and tax credits. These incentives are key to enabling historic preservation solutions and making the preservation of these structures a reality. It is Preservation Buffalo - Niagara's hope that a practical, proactive approach is crafted to facilitate the more responsible stewardship of threatened historic buildings and sites in the Buffalo - Niagara Community. Preservation Buffalo - Niagara is offering its expertise to assist any municipality with the creation and implementation of such an approach.

Beth_0012.JPG

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

There is no better candidate for facadism than the Bethlehem Office Building. Shame, shame, shame on our public officials if they do not fully explore this option.

This is such a beautiful Beaux-Arts building, is on the newly-revitalizing waterfront, can be reused in the future, and is an incredibly integral part of this city's past. SAVE THE FACE!!

www.buffalorising.com/2012/05/wrecking-wny-bethlehem-office-building.html

Score: 19 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Completely agree!!!

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Facadism examples: www.google.com/search?q=facadism&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=imvns&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=gvmzT5neFKGQ2QXQopDqAg&ved=0CHQQsAQ&biw=1280&bih=625

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I thought you were developing a plan to save the structure. It certainly needs to be saved. Please update us as to progress, thanks.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Call the Mayor of Lackawanna's office and leave a message: 716-827-6464

I just did...

Score: 11 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Me too! I left a message. I hope the mayor gets enough calls to leave it open for discussion.

replied to queenseyes
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Please post a picture of Lackawanna City Hall. One of the ugliest buidings in the area!!!!! And as someone below says..this could be the new City Hall for Lackawanna.

replied to queenseyes
Score: 6 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I left a message.

replied to queenseyes
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

left a message too

replied to queenseyes
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm going to make an emergency trip to Buffalo as soon as I know when I'm off next week. I'm going to school in Albany and working here for the summer. I need to do proper photographs of this building before it's gone.

It's a shame that people can't see how this building is an asset to City of Lackawanna and the region itself.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How about next time there is such a grand plan to change the economy as happened in the 70s and 80s, gutting American industry and manufacturing corporate America and those who back such massive shifts actually go out of their way to plan a more reasonable transition rather than just pulling the rug out from underneath entire communities and regions and leaving everyone to swim without a life vest? Just a little consideration and a soul please. I guess thats not taught in business classes though. No such thing as the human element and community loyalty and ethics. Had the economic shift actually been planned to more gradually or soulfully transition we may not be faced with these loses because there may have actually been a new economy to fill these spaces.

Score: 4 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Although I understand your sentiments, the economy doens't work that way. Trade doesn't hang around and wait until you are ready and willing to change. WE live in a global economy now, like it or not, and we receive many benefits as well as many unbenefits. But there isn't much we can do about that.

What we CAN do, however, it make sure our local economy is diversified enough so that when inevitable change occurs, it's impact will be small or even beneficial. How can we do that?

First, by letting go. Industries or companies that are obsolete have to die a natural death. There simply is no point is propping up a dying industry or company with tax revenue. It's going to die anyway, and we have to face the music sometime. Better sooner than later, and better to free that money for more productive use.

That's been a problem in Buffalo: we throw tax benefits and grants to any one who claims that they need it to "save jobs" or to produce a handful of low paying jobs. We can no longer afford to do so, and we can never tax-credit our way to greatness.

replied to flyguy
Score: 16 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well said.

replied to Rand503
Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Rand>"First, by letting go. Industries or companies that are obsolete have to die a natural death."

I agree too, Rand, but the above should also apply to those movie theaters which you recently said should have been saved by taxpayers somehow (Marlowe, Century, etc.), if I interpreted you correctly about that.

The big muti-screen cinemas and continued growth of TV helped cause the businesses using those old theaters to die a natural death (except for North Park, might be only one that survived in Buffalo?)

And I'd say the following should apply to live theater groups too… no tax revenue to prop them up, just ticket sales, sponsorship deals, voluntary donations, and such.
Rand>"There simply is no point is propping up a dying industry or company with tax revenue."

replied to Rand503
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Though the smoke and fumes produced by steel plant furnaces cleared years ago, the highly visible property close to the waterfront found no takers. Crews are currently removing asbestos before starting demolition.

These two items are the most interesting.

What do you do with a building that nobody wants in a city that is too far gone? While it's a shame...what other options are there? Do you take money from other areas that are needed to save a building that is wanted?

Second to that...why not try and put the building back on the market, even if for 30 days, after the asbestos has been removed? Worth a shot

Score: 18 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Who is paying for this demo? Public, or private. Sorry if I missed that in the article. I'm guessing this is a publicly financed demo?

Funny (or not funny), that a typical financial impediment to rehabbing an older building, is often asbestos removal, but, when these buildings are demos, the asbestos is always removed 1st.

If half (or more) of the cost of demolition, is asbestos removal, wouldn't it make at least a little sense to, instead, allocate that money towards asbestos removal - for any developer who steps up to bring the building back to life?

In this case, the government has spent less money than they would have to demo the structure, and the developer isn't burdened with the high, and project inhibiting asbestos removal costs to rehab the building.

The pubic also wins, because, in the end, less of our tax dollars have been spent on the building demo, and we're left with a great building, back to life, back on the tax rolls, and contributing to the community.

Just a thought....

Score: 14 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I believe that is essentially what happened with the Dulski (Avant) building and now the Donovan. That approach does seem to work with more modern steel buildings but not sure how well it would with an older building where half of its appeal is the interior which would inevitably be destroyed with asbestos removal (some plaster contains asbestos). But if I had to choose I would rather save the shell than nothing at all.

replied to tjhorner1
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'd rather see it shipped off to Norcross, Georgia than destroyed... What a great school building this would make.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Finally we are going to see "progress" on this site. I sure hope the "obstructionists" don't win again and force this irreplaceable piece of our heritage to be saved and renovated. This will be a great shovel ready site soon.

Score: -5 ( 35 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You obviously know nothing about the property this building sits on

replied to STEEL
Score: -3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Actually I do.

Score: -1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This could be Lackawanna's City Hall with alot of effort and rehab dollars. In all my years travelling through Lackawanna I never once thought of the word "majestic" though. Rough, gritty or ghostly maybe.

Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agree but I've seen pictures of the interior and it's a complete gut job mostly due to the collapsed and buckled floors and ceilings. Very expensive for a city as beleaguered as Lackawanna. If the state were flush and grants available this could get done but time is running out for this building.

replied to flyguy
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Fix Buffalo blog broke this news yesterday with some beautiful interior photos.

http://fixbuffalo.blogspot.com/2012/05/bethlehem-steel-north-office-demolition.html

Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The problem, it seems is "controlled demolition". Due to a NYS law, this building will now HAVE to be sent to the landfill, in total, because it's been deemed that a controlled demolition is necessary. Is there really asbestos contamination in a simple glass window? A stone sill? A decorative stone acroterion? WHY must we throw the entire thing away? This law, along with the way in which demolition contracts are awarded, must be changed. Who's with me? Join us on Facebook at the group Preservation-Ready Sites, where we share ideas and opportunities.

Score: -1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Dana, the window glazing or putty around the glass that holds it in place and interior plaster often has asbestos in it. Other issues may be lead paint on metallic items. When many items are contaminated they often have to treat everything as "hot", otherwise it's a very tedious process to selectively remediate the affected materials, especially when the floors are collapsed making controlled access impossible. Not saying I like this but to be fair those are real issues when dealing with abandoned buildings of this vintage.

replied to DanaSaylor
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wonder if they even considered trying to save the facade?

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

stupid...stupid...stupid

Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Don't tear it down and put it in a landfill..take it down brick by brick and move it to canalside. I drive by this every day and think how great it could look if they just cut the trees down around it and tried to save it..slowly if nothing else.

what is the hurry in tearing this down??? Man..we learn nothing from our past mistakes

Score: 11 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's not going to 'waste'. Ever seen the inside of a demo contractor's house? Like an architectural history palace.

Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

look at what they did in utah for the city creek center. its a nice looking building but i am sick of every investment looking like a bunch of glorified condiments at a gas station.

Score: -4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Huh?

replied to impressingagent
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sorry its a beautiful looking building. we are just so abstract expressionist with our developmental needs. here, there, every where.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I spoke with the new Lackawanna mayor about this building at the end of March at the land bank presser at the Rath Building. He told me that the freight company that owns it & the surrounding property (on the south side of the Union Ship Canal inlet/outlet) had received a State grant to demo the building. He said the building was beyond salvaging and needed to come down -- I know, they always say that -- and he supported its demo. When I asked if he'd be willing to have a conversation with anyone to talk about alternatives, he said he didn't have any control over it -- it's in the owner's hands. But he then added -- just in case I didn't get how he really felt about the situation -- that his view of preservation is that preservationists just want to turn WNY into Colonial Williamsburg!

Frankly, it seems strange that a State grant is being used to demo a heritage structure that is eligible for State/National Historic Register listing. Especially in a case where environmental work is being carried out (asbestos removal), which requires permits that ought to trigger review by SHPO.

Frankly, I think this building could be reused, especially as it's essentially waterfront property, which increases its value, which presumably would help with financing adaptive reuse. This building is just south of the Buffalo/Lackawanna line -- the strip of land between it and the south side of the City Ship Canal inlet/outlet is actually within the City of Buffalo. A project with boating access could be done there that would be very valuable in terms of waterfront living, and would form an obvious southern bookend for the rest of the Outer Harbor revitalization. The freight company that owns the building and the land around it has plenty of land for its needs -- it could certainly spare the land along the south side of the ship canal that it's currently using for nothing but outdoor storage (not highest and best use, by a longshot), and it can certainly get along without the land currently occupied by the building because, obviously, it's not using that land now.

I wish luck to the folks who are contacting the Lackawanna mayor, but wonder how far that will get them. I'd be especially interested in whether the expenditure of State grant funds has included the proper SHPO review.

Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Demolish the interior and rear of the building but save the existing facade for future use.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Demolish the Mayor of Lackawanna and preserve the facade of good governance.

replied to paulsobo
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I spoke with Buffalo Plastering last year about the building and Gary Bolles at 716-885-9020, tried in vain to get ahold of someone on the building. This would be great for them, as they have done such things as the top of Shea's and many others here and around the world. Give them as much a push as you can, I can think of no better company to own this. What a great manufacturing faucility it could be! they are currently. Working on the Lafayette Hotel and what a job they are doing!

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

In a normal world, this building is too beautiful to destroy. Something is really wrong when it appears to make more sense to destroy it than to save and/or recycle it. Very sad....

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Take this building over the grain elevators any day. Such a grand dame such a shame.

Score: 2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

tear it down and you will regret it forever; this grand building must be saved and not be part of coffee table book of "Buffalo remembered" photographs. HUGE mistake!

Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While I have loved this building for the last 32 years of my life, and did some urban exploration in it over several occasions, unfortunately I agree that the building is a sad shape. Collapsed floors, stairwells, roofs,and no heat for over 30 years of being abandoned along the waterfront have done this building no good.

Could it be saved, sure. It's in a prime location, but was this site really marketed to outsiders ever? I doubt it. Could have been a catalyst for some type of waterfront for Lackawanna, but Lackawanna is a joke of a city which should have dissolved after the shuttering of the steel plants, as it was only setup for them anyways.

I do believe it would have made for an interesting City Hall/Public Safety complex for Lackawanna, but unfortunately we live in the real world of WNY.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This building could be such a nice club house for a huge golf club on all that land. How about Bethlehem National Golf Club.

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

BEST comment out of all for this story. Considering the short list of potential re-uses for this property, a links-style golf course would be great. And this would be a gorgeous clubhouse.

I understand getting pissed about some (not all) of the properties being demolished, but be realistic. The site is so far removed from the city and so contaminated that there isn't much of anything that *could* be done here. Saving the facade would be a nice start, but what would be built there? The site is in no-mans land. The Lackawana City Hall idea makes sense, but the necessary remediation probably wouldn't allow for it.

replied to buffdude
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

WHY DONT ANY OF YOU LOAFERS BUY THIS BUILDING AND RE-DO IT LIKE I DID FOR 20 YEARS RE-DOING MY BUILDING ? SCARED OF WORK? THEN SHAD UP!!!!!!

Score: -9 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I wasn't sure if you were serious, but then I realized you used CAPS LOCK. So you MUST mean business.

What took 20 years? Did you form and fire the bricks by hand?

replied to warehousedweller
Score: 5 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

almost ,tully. bought a building that was 100 years old that was doomed for demo and i restored it!did it with my own hands and my own money! you people just sit back and bitch about what isnt happening , well make it happen like i did! no sack...

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's actually funny to read your previous posts. Literally 2/3 of your comments are essentially the same thing: something to the effect of it's their land, you're lazy, go buy a farm. And of course the KEYBOARD YELLING!

Do you have it saved on your desktop? Just copy/paste?

replied to warehousedweller
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm thinking he's the recrudescence of BROKeepsBlockingMe.

replied to LouisTully
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Indeed one of my favorite under appreciated buildings in WNY..right up there with Trico.

Much about the distribution operator that seems to own the building? Unfortunately..limited population..limited resources..we only have so much that can go so far. As stated above "it sat on the waterfront for years...and no takers". No takers..development $$ from one project to something like this (I allow it..its a great building) with no takers and no end goal in mind? Not going to work..inevitable.

I wonder how much long Preservation Buffalo Niagara can continue to be a "reactive" organization instead of "proactive".

A "Bura" like partnership..public/private financing..fundraisers..donations. Stabilization.."facadism"..etc. You all clamor for the City to do something..but you know just as well as I that even if WNY politics had their house in order there are far FAR greater priorities.

In reality..PBN isn't much better than the City in my opinion..we have a treasure like this and all we get is a press release.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Channel 4 has a report with some additional information on the situation, although I can't vouch for the accuracy of it:
http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/buffalo/demolition-for-bethlehem-steel-building

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

wivb quote: "City of Lackawanna officials are tired of trying to preserve it."

translation - "We put a fence around it and ignored it for 30 years, but now it's a liability so we're tearing it down no matter how much that costs."

Score: 10 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Ignored it? The building apparently is and always has been private property since 1902 - not govt public property. Other than aspects of public safety, the city govt of Lackawanna should have had no role with it.

I don't know of any reason to think their mayor or council would have tried to block a serious private sector effort to save it, if such an effort had ever happened.

If that WIVB report you and RaChaCha mentioned is correct, public $ aren't being used for the demo.

replied to 300miles
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

One thing the city of Lackawanna could have done was code enforcement about 30 years ago to prevent the current condition to some degree.

I disagree with the City moving its city hall here. For one it's too far removed from the rest of the city. Secondly, I think Lackawanna should be absorbed into Buffalo.

There was a time when the population and density called for all these resources but now its way overkill. For example, no need for three separate fire stations there. I grew up in Lackawanna, my family owns multiple childcare centers there now and my grandfathers brother was mayor at one point so I do have a fondness for it but its time they consolidated.

replied to whatever
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

whatever: "the city govt of Lackawanna should have had no role with it."


Wrong. As brownteeth wrote - they have codes to enforce. If a homeowner lets their grass grow for 3 weeks they can get a ticket, but a commercial building abandoned by the company and left to rot for 30 years is A-OK with the city??


And besides, there are things the city is required to do, like enforce codes, but there are other things the city should just *want* to keep proactive about. Just like Buffalo finally got off its ass to press Paladino about the Greystone, or how the city got involved with the Statler. These were never owned by the city, but the city took an interest (sometimes grudgingly) about making sure they were not left to rot.

replied to whatever
Score: 7 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

300 & bteeth, a question - how do we know Lackawanna courts didn't issue fines on this building's owner over the years regarding code violations? I really don't have any idea if they did or didn't. Do either of you happen to know?

By the way, code enforcement falls within what I wrote about safety.
300 apparently forgot to include first part of my sentence when quoting it:
whatever>"Other than aspects of public safety, the city govt of Lackawanna should have had no role with it."

Keep in mind demolition has always been a lawful option to end the possibility of this building having any code violations.

I agree with brownteeth about this not being a good location for a City Hall. Regardless of architecture, their current one on Ridge Rd near South Park Ave is much easier for citizens to get to, especially in winters or bad weather.

If it turns out that Lackawanna could have more heavily fined the owner than they did (if they did at all - again, I don't know) or jailed him or her, wouldn't it likely have just made this demolition happen years sooner, not later, considering lack of market interest over the past 30 years it's been vacant?

replied to 300miles
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

About who's most to blame instead of Lackawanna city govt, here's a question -

Why did private sector people who love this building (such as any of you who phoned Lackawanna's mayor this week to complain) choose to to not make a big public effort to try raising private $ for buying & mothballing it?
Now, of course you guys also do have a right to merely complain to and about the government. I'm not saying you don't have that right. If you expect it to accomplish much you're likely to be disappointed. For one reason, the govt also represents people who don't want any public $ used for this building.

It's been over 3 years since Buffalo Rising in April 2009 reported a demo was being planned for this. I don't know if there were also any reports before that, but there was one then. It's easily findable via Google. That was 37 months ago. Imagine how many fundraising events could have been held from then to now. Or how many wealthy lovers of old vacant buildings could have been contacted in an effort to ask them to chip in for buying and mothballing this priceless part of our historic industrial fabric.
Locals or expats could have organized those kinds of attempts.
Or even if you really insist that taxpayers should have to help save it, did you try to find any potential candidates among Lackawanna residents who who also feel that way and try to convince them to run for council or mayor there, then donated to them or volunteer for their campaigns?
Somebody could have run for council or mayor on a platform of using govt $ to save this building, and maybe we'd have learned from the election result what portion of Lackawanna voters seem to agree with that idea.

Instead of blaming Lackawanna's city govt which has never owned this building (and maybe none of its elected officials have even ever claimed to want it saved forever), why shouldn't you guys be blaming yourselves for passivity on sidelines for years of not trying to raise funds like the Central Terminal group does?

replied to 300miles
Score: -3 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yay for you! Called it out. You are absolutely correct.

replied to whatever
Score: 0 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yep, thanks. I wonder what's even the other side of the argument. If any of them had made a serious private fund raising effort over the years beyond blogging & phoning mayors but then fell short of success, at least I might admire that.

But just yakking or finger pointing for years and years without any effort toward some constructive step toward privately funded mothballing is… a free speech right people have, of course. Not much else.

replied to ladyinwhite
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What no one is willing to talk about is WHY????? Why is it that companies around the country that specialize in manufacturing and would find the Buffalo/Lackawana area a vital location for their business haven't jumped on this opportunity???? The answer is simple.....unions, local nonsensical regulations, politics and NY State taxation policies. Don't call the local mayor!! That fool is the reason no one is buying. Wake up Buffalo, Western NY, and America...... until we start putting together incentives and reduce restrictions on business Buffalo and surrounding areas will forever be riddled with health care facilities, back office centers and chicken wing establishments. Remove the ridiculous shackles on business today and we will thrive again. Until then....tear it down and make way for more government facilities funded by taxation and federal programs.

Let's ask a simple question-----let's pretend that NY State put out an advertisement that said: Any business willing to establish itself and relocate in this facility in Lackawana,NY would receive a ten year tax free Federal and State incentive, local OCEA and EPA restrictions will be waived and non-union employees will be allowed for hire. Additional tax incentives will be provided for the hire of handicap, former military personnel and employees out of work for the last 18 months.

Let's just say that this article wouldn't be about BSNOB facility getting ready to be torn down, but about a new manufacturing company from Iowa hiring a local building contractor ready to begin construction.

This isn't rocket science......WAKE UP, GET OUT THE PITCH FORKS AND TAKE A STAND AMERICA! STOP THE MADNESS or we"re going the way of GREECE.

Score: -2 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You forgot to tell us to vote for Ron Paul.

replied to phil
Score: 7 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You should read Sparrows Point.

replied to phil
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

sorry, but this whole business drives me insane!!!! Did anyone know that GE (its CEO Jeff Immelt was hired by Obama as our jobs Csar) fired and closed its entire operation in Winchester, VA that made edison bulbs for the past 100 years and relocated all new operations to China???? How can one of the largest manufacturing companies in America hold up its head and move jobs overseas without explaining to the American people the dollars and cents of its decision? UNIONS, REGULATIONS, TAXATION.....these are the death blows to any company making money today. This is why Buffalo is stagnant. This is why Bethlehem steel went belly up. This is why the floors of this building are buckling!!! It's incredibly sad, but not for the reasons anyone in this blog are talking about!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If you want to preserve the integrity and architectural beauty of buffalo's former glory, vote to stop the tyranny of unionized labor, tell Andrew Cuomo to stay home and eat Sandra Lee's stale cupcakes, and promote tax incentives for new business willing to re-locate to the Buffalo area. The opportunities that Buffalo provides are endless....let's not be stagnant and give in to the political madness that has become so commonplace in our world today.

Score: -1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You don't know what your talking about. Virginia is a right to work state. Unions have nothing to do with a bulb factory closing.

replied to phil
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You don't know what your talking about. Virginia is a right to work state. Unions have nothing to do with a bulb factory closing.

replied to phil
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lackawanna is currently working on the first phase of its First Ward Brownfield Opportunity Area. They could have invited Buffalo Crushed Stone to the table as a stakeholder to focus specifically on this property. The BOA program provides a municipality with up to 90 percent of the total eligible project costs for such things as:

community visioning and other public participation processes; existing conditions analysis; strategic site identification; economic and market studies; investigations to assess site contamination and environmental conditions; site-specific redevelopment plans; infrastructure improvement studies, environmental impact assessments and statements; marketing to attract developer interest; local law changes; development standards and design guidelines; and other actions to spur investment in, clean-up of and redevelopment of brownfields and other underutilized sites.

Sounds like that could go a long way in at least getting a structural analysis of the building, marketing it to outside developers, and maybe even releasing a joint RFP.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Or they can just find an architectural enthusiast with $50 million to spare. Really, this building should have been on the National Trust for Historic Preservation's most endangered buildings list YEARS AGO. How does something like this fly under everyone's radar for so long? How is it that the only people who gave a damn were Urban explorers?

replied to DTK2OD
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While it was an interesting building in its day, today it is blight. Even if efforts were put into donating to restore it, and keep the wrecking ball from bringing it down, the building is isolated. I said this before, but the building really is not connected to any urban fabric, its all by itself in a corridor that is better suited to become parkland. It will be good to get the building down so that it can allow Buffalo to move forward. It isn't good having people ride into town looking at vacant buildings such as this one. There is no private money or investment to restore this property, and even if there was it'd be an island onto itself. As grand as the property was, its not got a purpose today. Even if it became condos it'd be an awkward location without connection.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment