Painting for Preservation Not Resting on its Laurels, Heading to Chicago Next
Comments
Leave a commentWhen my husband and I were trying to buy our house it was a foreclosure and bank owned as well. They didn't give a crap about it's condition period! In the couple months that were waiting for our loan to go through 3 windows on the 1st floor were broken and the house broken into. We called the listing company and they were supposed to take care of it. Well they didn't. We had open windows all over the place. We didn't own the house so we felt it wasn't our job to board up the windows. Then when we finally got the house they wouldn't give us a price break during closing on the damage that was done (that my husband and I had to pay for) when the house was owned by them. It was a joke. Also someone from the bank took all the original frames so now we have to replace the frames as well as the glass which is proving very difficult since everything was custom built back then. We have been to reuse multiple times and they don't have the right size either.
Sorry to hear about that, but so glad you & your husband are doing right by the house even though the bank didn't.
P4P rocks! In a "fun, relaxed, and welcoming" way ;-) I made a deeply pathetic sketch at the recent event on Busti, and no one laughed at it (at least, not in my presence). The violinist that day did a rendition of "Ashokan Farewell" that was even more soulful than that in the documentary "The Civil War."
This is a really amazing building here, made all the more so by having an inglenook (image 4) -- perhaps one in each unit.
There isn't one person who painted pictures for preservation that would live at 53 Laurel St.
You polled them and are certain of that?
Sure, it's east of Main St. But is it really that bad? It's a half mile from Oakland Pl.
Usually I just let these comments take their course, but here I must object. I would absolutely live at 53 Laurel St. The people who came out to talk with us were very friendly and urban gardening is laying down roots right around the corner. The rest of the street is very well-maintained. It's an attractive house that doesn't seem to need quite as much investment as many other abandoned city homes. I believe you would get the same response from many of the people that were out making art that day. It is never good to make broad assumptions about people or places -- stereotyping is always a negative.
DUDE YOU ARE SOOOOOOOO WRONG.
I wasn't at that particular event, but I would live at 53 Laurel Street.
In a coincidence, many of my friends independently said, "I want this house!." The building is on an intact street with nice neighbors, with Farmers and Builders next door on Michigan and a McDonald's on Main. One block from Utica station. Everyone at that event would love to live there.
Sheldon S. Kornpett, DDS -- re: "There isn't one person who painted pictures for preservation that would live at 53 Laurel St."
Penalty! Off-sides comment!
House hunting is not listed among their goals.
Painting for Preservation's goals are:
1. Raise awareness of at-risk, distressed and under-utilized locations and their neighborhoods
2. Create a record of historically rich locations through art
3. Create a community of artists invested in the urban landscape
4. Bring exposure and provide assistance to artists interested in documenting at-risk historic neighborhoods while also improving the quality of life in those same neighborhoods.
5. Involve distressed communities in sharing the beauty in their backyard.
Compliments to the group! The coverage of this building on BRO is a demonstration of their effectivness in raising awareness.
Leave a comment
Sponsor
Recent Comments
Sponsor
Interested in advertising on BuffaloRising?
E-mail John C. Powell
or call John at 716.602.0200




The question is - If the bank owns the building why are they not being held accountable for its condition? So much of this problem could be eliminated if owners where held accountable for the stewardship of their investments.
Allowing buildings to rot should no longer be tolerated as business plan in Buffalo.
It's difficult enough to get banks to finance properties in this kind of neighborhood, making them price in penalties if the property owner goes bust would drive any money out.
As has been mentioned here repeatedly, the process for turning over these (foreclosed or city owned) should be more transparent.
Before I saw that an offer had been made, I had to call Zee's property service to see what bank owned the property. You'd think a third party could develop a website for these properties that doesn't include a membership fee. If none exists, and people would think it worthwhile, I could pretty quickly develop such a site.
DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!