City May 29, 2012 12:01 AM

Editing the Proposed Fruit Belt Townhouses

Editing the Proposed Fruit Belt Townhouses
By Nicholas Miller

When I saw the post about the planned Fruit Belt townhouses, I thought it was a good opportunity to show how simple design changes can have a big impact. It's pretty clear to me that the designers were trying to create the illusion of detached houses. 

St. John Community Development Corporation is planning to build 49, two to four-bedroom residences on 17 City-owned sites. Buildings have been designed to complement the 28 townhouses units St. John CDC built five years ago with predominantly brick front facades, siding, shingle accenting and full-front porches (below).


FB066.jpg
In my opinion, the design wasn't likely to fool anyone and was worse for trying to do so. Further, the mix of materials and colors also looked chaotic rather than harmonious.  For example, the three-unit design had three colors of brick and two kinds of siding in three colors. Sometimes, less is more.

townhouses3_elevation.jpg
townhouses3.jpg
I've reduced the cladding to just two materials - brick and shingles. I linked the units together by running these materials across the entire structure in two bands. I further simplified the design by eliminating the small gables along the porch's roof. In the original three-unit design, the central gable is slightly smaller than the end gables. Instead of shrinking the central gable, I made all the gables the same size and compensated by shrinking the indent between units. 

townhouses2_elevation.jpg
townhouses_simple_facia.jpg
I also suggest building the porches with brick and adding a slight curve to the facia boards to add interest to the gables - a detail that could be easily fabricated on site. I've also provided a rendering of the gables with straight facia boards. These changes shouldn't alter the project cost much at all, it's really just how the same materials are applied. This design also isn't completely dependent on particular materials, so there are opportunities to save. For instance, the brick could be substituted with stucco or blocks.

On a final note. The single-story designs seem like a missed opportunity. They should add an upstairs unit. It could even be a market-rate unit that would help subsidize the rest of this project. The marginal cost for those additional units would be relatively low. It would share the same foundation, roof, and some of the plumbing and electrical of the downstairs unit that's already budgeted.

Nicholas Miller graduated from the Ohio State University with a B.A. in Urban Geography and Economics in 2010. He currently lives in Detroit with his partner where he works in the GIS field.

townhouses_simple_facia_elevation.jpg

View image

1 TrackBack

TrackBack URL: http://www.buffalorising.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/12984

Foo Fighters Buffalo Belt Buckle from Cheap Buffalo Bills Tickets Blog on June 8, 2012 4:52 AM

[...] rve to the facia boards to add interest to the gables - a detail that could be e [...] Read More

Comments

Leave a comment

I like the brick porches and curved facia boards. But otherwise, I prefer the original design with the mixed colors. I think with either design, there is no illusion that the homes are connected town homes. The single-color redesign is less busy, no doubt, but it is also more cookie cutter/tract or public housing-esque. I mean no disrespect, but why is kid in Detroit worried about redesigning a housing development in the Fruit Belt in Buffalo?

Score: -3 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I really like the redesign. What they are planning on building looks like a caricature of a real home.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Public housing-esgue? Huh?

The redesign is simple and classic, like a good martini. It would fit in seamlessly on Ashland or Norwood. Nicholas Tyler Miller is a talent.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Needs more gold leaf work in the scrolls and volutes above the Lapis Lazuli columns.

Score: -3 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I assume the colors are there to denote one person's home from another. So you don't feel like you are living in the projects. Kind of like how in NYC people paint their piece of the row houses. It is important to feel like this is my space.

Score: 11 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This kind of differentiation by varying roof pitches and colors and so forth is uncommon in traditional architecture. Check out these two examples on Bidwell Parkway showing how the use of common colors and materials can result in unity and elegance:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/thehydraulics/5705815062/in/pool-buffalo_building_types

http://www.flickr.com/photos/thehydraulics/5704925306/in/pool-buffalo_building_types/

The tendency toward non-rational articulation and disregard for traditional precedent is an affliction in contemporary architecture.

replied to sbrof
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agreed, but both of the examples you provide display a very distinct separation between one side and the other with physical elements to reinforce the divide, gutters \ chimney location, mirrored entrances away from each other.

Both the original and this new redesign fail to create this identity between one side and the other. At least the original 'attempted' to do this through color. Using a unified color scheme without any additional elements to reinforce the 'line' would indeed make this feel more like a public housing complex than a row house with two units.

The opposite extreme, uniform materials without any architectural differentiations:
https://maps.google.com/maps?q=public+housing&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

replied to chris_hawley
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It is also an affliction of crappy architecture and a symptom of a broken architectural education system. The original design is cartoon architecture.

replied to chris_hawley
Score: -4 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I upvoted this!

replied to STEEL
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

keep the horizontal whatever-it-is that separates the second floor from the gable. they look unfinished without it.

Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like the mixed colors like the Psychiatric Center houses on Grant and Letchworth: http://goo.gl/maps/Qxo0

This is not the best example, but I think the building fits nicely into the area.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What is the depth of the porches? Porches that are only 3 or 4 feet deep aren't very useful.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As I depict them, they are eight feet deep. I don't know what St. John is planning, though. I would agree that very shallow porches are not particularly useful and are more of a decoration than a living space.

replied to hamp
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Build them the farthest away from the Life Sciences Campus as possible. If you fill this area in to soon then the Life Sciences Campus will not have the room to expand.

The high amount of un-used land was one of the reasons that the Fruit Belt was chosen. The Campus has been successful and its one of the few successes Buffalo can hang its hat on.

Dont mess it up by making it landlocked with new housing where people are going to refuse to leave so the Life Sciences Campus can expand.

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

My vote, for what its worth, goes with the original varied design. I like the take on the painted lady. The re-design isn't bad, but it is too Archie Bunker. Looks too much like the older construction one sees in the endless blue collar neighborhoods found in the large cities of the northeast corridor like Baltimore, Philly, or Queens.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment