Real Estate May 22, 2012 12:29 AM

Design Revealed for 766 Elmwood Infill Project

Design Revealed for 766 Elmwood Infill Project

Benchmark Group's proposed infill project at 766 Elmwood Avenue is heading to the Zoning Board of Appeals on Wednesday.   The three-story mixed-use building with retail space along Elmwood and 24 apartments on the upper floors would be built on a surface parking lot located between Globe Market and 7-11.  Karl Frizlen, project architect, says the new building will adhere to the Elmwood Village Design Standards but needs a variance from the City.  It is similar in design to the successful mixed-use building Frizlen designed for the Krog Corp. at Elmwood and Bryant.


IMG_1572.JPGelmperspective.png

From the project narrative:

The 3-story mixed-use building in the core of the 700 Elmwood block will greatly enhance the urban character and vitality of the block. The building meets the sidewalk and storefronts wrapping around the building will provide ample window shopping and eye contact between storeowner and shoppers on the street. The parking is tucked away under the building and accessible from the alley in the rear. The curb cuts are eliminated guaranteeing a contiguous pedestrian environment where safe congregation can take place. The tenants of the upper floor apartments will support and enhance the commercial activities in the Village and the project will contribute to a substantial increase to the City's tax base.

elmsiteplan.png

Amherst-based Benchmark owns a number of area commercial and residential properties including the Stuyvesant Plaza on Elmwood at North and the retail building housing Spot Coffee and Blockbuster Video across from the site at 765 Elmwood.

The project does need a variance for the residential density that is being proposed. Frizlen has designed and/or developed several Elmwood Village projects including 448 Elmwood, 504 Elmwood and the apartments at 305 W. Utica Street

View image

Comments

Leave a comment

So pretty much the same exact building a couple blocks away?? Definitely not a fan!

Score: -37 ( 75 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Hence fitting into the over all fabric of the street. Manhattan is miles and miles of similiar buildings when you get off the main thorough fares.

This is a great project glad to see that gap filled in and even more life brought to this area.

replied to Jay D
Score: 34 ( 52 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

and this isnt Manhattan. Elmwood doesnt really scream cookie cutter

replied to sobuffbillsfan
Score: -30 ( 54 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

...and it won't after this building is completed

replied to Jay D
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Im excited about the infill, but am I really that wrong to have hoped for something a little more exciting and not a copy of whats a block away?

replied to Billo
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wow. A gap filler. This is new and exciting.

replied to sobuffbillsfan
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Another parking lot bites the dust. Great news!

What's next?

Score: 47 ( 57 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

A 60 story green glass condo tower.

replied to Chris
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

These stupid zoning laws can't be gotten rid of fast enough.

Score: 17 ( 39 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Looks great.

Score: 19 ( 27 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No Dry-Vit, please -- and how about some architectural terra-cotta--? I talked with a representative from Boston Valley at a conference recently, and they told me they can make up designs cost-competitive with brick for buildings like this.

Score: 20 ( 30 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree--it would be great to see us start to showcase the work of BV...a hometown star. And, agreed---NO DRY-VIT.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 2 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree. Can we get some real brick on the front?
Other than that - great to see infill!

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Does Boston Valley attend the Allentown Art Festival?

Have they sent samples to local architectural and construction firms?

I dont know? This is Elmwood Avenue and I would think it would be pretty easy to create a ground swell of public support for local artisans of brick and terra cotta to be incorporated in exterior remodels and new construction.

There doesnt seem to be that bond yet but I think it can be easily had.

Heck if we can bind local artisans thru the Allentown Art Festival and local eaters through our Taste of Buffalo Festival...then we can certainly use local artisans to make our local architecture distinctive.

replied to RaChaCha
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Not a very inspiring design, but not every building needs to be. Its a good urban building, and will make the area safer for pedestrians and drivers.

Score: 22 ( 28 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

LIke it except for the Dryvit "cornice". Why not just end the top in brick? Or keep it flat?

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Predictable and not terribly exciting but not worth fussing over. I like that it fills a gap and brings more density, it is a good project.

Score: 12 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Put a convenience store in the ground floor retail and finally kill the Wilson Farms-now-7/11.Then knock it down for another new build or rehab the building with an addition up to the sidewalk. Make the parking lot next to Blockbuster a multistory parking facility. That's my fantasy for this morning.

Score: 21 ( 33 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This should be a model for all city commercial infill redevelopment. First floor retail, apartments or offices on upper floors, built to sidewalk and most importantly - parking in back.
Duplicate this footprint all over the city. I like it a lot.

Score: 25 ( 45 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Would one of the thumb down votes to derby98's comment please explain why the simple and common sense comment is a bad one.

replied to derby98
Score: 4 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This has always been an area on Elmwood where I look across from Spot and feel disappointed to see that parking lot next to the Globe. This is a more than welcome change to one of the centers of elmwood.

Retail space, a descent design, and fills in a parking lot - bud-ah-da-da-dah, Im lovin it.

Score: 11 ( 17 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Eh, apathetic.

Good because it brings more density to a great part of town.

With the ammount of rent this area demands, why wouldn't the architect put a little more pazzaz into the design. I know this isn't 1901, but there has to be a "model" above this.

They're giving us a Ford, when all we're asking for is a Mercury. (as opposed to the top of the line Lincoln for those who don't follow car levels)

Score: 4 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Maybe they could "jeuge" it with some embellishments from the Bethlehem slated for demo.

Oh, the irony is killing me..........

www.buffalorising.com/2012/05/one-last-look.html

Score: 1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Elmwood is sacred is should not be scarred with new development nor alteration, unless it is done to "MY" standards. This interjection of liquidity, jobs and development is killing our urban, neo-hippie culture.

Score: -7 ( 49 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Fantastic project! I love that it uses the alley to provide parking access instead of having one or two curb cuts for a driveway. This is one of the few alleys in Buffalo, and it's wonderful to see it used as designed.

I hope the materials will conform to the Elmwood Village Design Standards, which disallow Dry-Vit and other "fake stone" materials. That is my one disappointment with the 448 Elmwood building.

I don't care if the design of the building itself is a bit ordinary. Buffalo needs about 1000 more of these to fill in the parking lots that we've chopped our neighborhoods up with over the past 70 years or so. Of all the architects in Buffalo, I'd say that Karl Frizlen is the one with the best urban sensibility. His buildings really feel like they belong in a city, and he manages to make the site plan work without needing to demolish adjacent buildings for parking, or add multiple curb cuts for driveways.

And this also gives me a bit of hope that Benderson might be capable of doing something that approximates urban design at Canal Side.

Score: 6 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well, this project is Benchmark, not Benderson.

replied to JSmith
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Oh, you're right! I don't know how I got the idea it was a Benderson property. Never mind then, Canal Side might still suck! ;-

replied to townline
Score: -3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's ok for what it is. But let's face it: this building is ugly. It would have been better to strip away any hint of ornamentation and go full-on 'Poverty Modern'.

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

what would be ideal is to demolish 7-eleven and plaece this building on the corner where 7 eleven stands....I cant stand the vagrants and dirt that store brings....Why cant we just eliminate it.....Also - the build looks really nice but I hope it doesnt place a shadow over Globes patio all day long and it looks like it will

Score: -10 ( 22 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This infill is on the north side of Globe's patio. It should not affect the sun/shadow situation at all.

replied to elmdog
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And is his Bryant and elmwood project a complete success? Coffee Culture's business is stagnant at best and the other 2 commercial spots have zero interest...........Once childrens is gone this building will be a dead zone

Score: -9 ( 33 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What are you basing this on?

1 - the building at Bryant is a completely different developer.
2 - Are you claiming to be familiar with the gross receipts at Coffee Culture?
3 - Its my understanding that every single one of the very expensive apartments in that building is leased.
4 - How do you know there has been no interest in the other commercial spaces? In fact - there was a sunglasses retailer who had one of the spaces leased. If you go on Google Streetview - they even had their sign on the building. If that's not at least "interest," I don't know what is. Who knows what fell through with that business, but I don't go around randomly slapping signs for my own business ideas on buildings I'm not actually interested in...

Get real - 2 vacant spots (that are probably expensive) for the first year is a mere blip on the radar in the history of a building or a street. Do you really think the developer who is paying for this thing didn't do their homework on it?

replied to elmdog
Score: 15 ( 21 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I am basing it on my perception and going to Coffee culture most saturday mornings and counting the people who walk in on one hand, over the 2 hours I sometimes spend there..And I really like Coffee Culture- I like the large menu, the free trade coffee and the location....
Are we going to base success on a sign placed in a window that never came to fruition? The building is going on 2 years old and the 2 other spaces arent moving -
Maybe they are looking for the perfect tenant, but I dont see it and will probably add my opinion a few more times about it.........

replied to townline
Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Are you suggesting the KFC was a better option for that corner? In case you forgot, we're still coming out of the worst recession in at least 3 decades. I'm not bothered in the least by the slow progress on getting retail tenants, it's never easy, especially now. And you don't dispute that there are now tenants in the apartments which is a better use of the property than KFC. There's more to that area than Children's Hospital.

replied to elmdog
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Lets not forget how expensive Elmwood rents can be.

replied to elmdog
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

What are the air rights on the Elmwood Strip. Are you only able to cap any new builds at 3 stories? I bet 5 stories with apartments could probably be pre-rented before construction is even complete

Score: 9 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The Elmwood Village Design Standards say "One-story buildings and buildings of more than five stories are considered inappropriate."

replied to 5to81ALLDAY
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

So add 2 more floors...and make it 5 floors total.

Then its a benefit to all.

replied to JSmith
Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Isn't the 7/11 next door 1 story?

I understand the EV wouldn't want a 10 story building there but I dont think 5 is unreasonable, plus there is demand.

replied to JSmith
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The design guidelines were formally approved by the city about 3 years ago. The convenience store (building) was already there. Three stories is consistent with the roof line of the neighboring Globe Market, And with the exception of 7-11 approximates the height of the remaining buildings on that side of the 700 block. That is a good infill feature.

replied to 5to81ALLDAY
Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Infill, love it.

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nice!

Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is terrible. Sure it fills a parking lot, but that parking lot is never empty! It is always packed. Why not fill some of the other vacant buildings around the area.. i.e. Off the Wall on West Utica & Elmwood, the building a few store fronts down from Zetti's or the building next to Bullfeathers...

ALSO, if you are going to build a building ON ELMWOOD, why can't you build a patio to go with it. Buffalo, specifically Elmwood, needs more patios!

Score: -1 ( 29 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I agree with the patio concept - A raised wooden patio that can hold 50 people or more - maybe a solo acts etc....

Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Cookie:

RE: patios: Good call. You're right that especially on Elmwood that would be a wise amenity to anticipate. From the landlord's point of view, maybe the costs outweigh the benefits (in use less than half the year, reduces rented area available within structure and so on). But like you, I love patios and encourage them.

RE: Parking lost: again, you are right that the existing lot is perpetually packed. Those displaced autos will stress a neighborhood already tight on parking. But bear two points in mind:

1. The owner/developer of this project is also the landlord across the street (Spot, Blue Fin, Blockbuster). This lot has been utilized by that landlord for its own tenants across Elmwood for years. Benchmark is fully aware of potential impacts to its existing tenant retailers. I give them the benefit of the doubt. If Benchmark had instead deemed it best to retain the parking for their own tenants, I'd have supported that, too. I want thriving businesses. I, too, wonder where these customers will park. But I am happy that Benchmark envisions a net benefit for themselves in developing this. It's a big win for the neighborhood fabric. Elmwood will look better to you and me because of this infill.

2. That lot of Benchmark's is used by its tenants, true, but not exclusively by its tenants. I park there when going to Globe, Dolci, Penzey's . . . yes, I know it is illegal; there is a posted sign stating who may or may not park there, and unless I'm patronizing a Benchmark tenant, I'm illegally parked. I dismiss the infraction every single time, as do many other shoppers. So here's the question: why should Benchmark (or any other property owner) be forced to host neighborhood parking? It's own parking needs? Sure. The parking needs of its neighbors? That's unfair.

Let's pretend that Benchmark did not own the former supermarket across the street (Bell's back in the day, now Spot, etc). Let's imagine that by redeveloping this parking lot, Spot and Blue Fin and Globe would all starve for lack of customers. Is that the responsibility of this land owner? No. If those businesses require parking, it's their financial responsibility to develop it (buy out some land along the alley, for example).

Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

And if they could buy some of the houses on Ashland and tear them down we could get more parking for more stores. There's progress.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: -1 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

buying garages and a stray beat up apartment building on an alley is very different from buying and demolishing on Ashland. Where do you propose the displaced parking go?

replied to Penn Station
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

While I think the parking lot is beneficial to a lot of businesses, I agree this is the main point:
bini>"Is that the responsibility of this land owner? No. If those businesses require parking, it's their financial responsibility to develop it (buy out some land along the alley, for example)."

Makes sense.

Or some businesses could move to somewhere other than EV that has convenient parking lots, as did the natural foods store at Breckenridge (replaced by real estate agency with less need for convenient parking), and the Fleet Feet store (replaced by dentist's office, perhaps also less need for convenient parking).

I wonder if Blockbuster's business model has many more years of profitability. If and when that closes, perhaps Benchmark would demo some portion of that big store (maybe the back?) to create a few more parking spaces for tenants such as Spot & the restaurant. On the other hand, when Blockbuster closes some day spaces won't be needed for customers there. I'm guessing the Panera Bread idea a few mentioned was just made up and not really happening.

It will be a little ironic if any upscale favorites of anti-parking folks end up suffering - such as Globe Market or nearby boutiques. Not only did they benefit from their customers being practically able to park in Benchmark's lot, but they also benefit from customers of Benchmark's tenants such as Spot being able to park in that lot instead of on the street. When the lot is gone, most of those will park on the street, or try to.
Time will tell.

I also agree with what Bini's said about 7-11 based on so many people voting their approval by shopping there, often stopping there with cars.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I love the infill. You get so used to the sight of a parking lot there that you almost think it's (gulp) normal. I've said this before, and I'm saying it again. Karl Frizlen's designs are lifeless and BORING. And yes, somebody mentioned virtually an identical structure right down the street where the KFC used to be. Where's the creativity. Why can't we reach out to other architects from other cities and add some CHARACTER to projects like this. Yes, it's much better than a parking lot, but these opportunities need to be seized.

Score: 0 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

RE: 'why can't we get rid of 7-11 next door?':

Well, the primary reason that building isn't being demolished is because it houses a thriving business, supported strongly by the neighborhood. Which is a good thing. Despite the affront to urban sensibilities its parking lot and one story box bring to BR readers, that site works very well for the store and its patrons. Waste your energy bemoaning that fact, if you like. But as long as it thrives (which it does; the parking lot is always in use, mostly from store patrons), it's not going down anytime soon. Someday, way in the future, sure. Now or in the next decade? Don't hold your breath.

As to this infill project? Sure it looks derivative, but it functions well. Love the parking in the rear, love that each residential unit gets a porch (that's critical, imo). Vast improvement over current conditions. Thanks, Benchmark.

Score: 15 ( 19 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm sure 7-11 has a price tag at which they would sell the building, if someone really wanted to build out that corner badly enough.

replied to biniszkiewicz
Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is a great urban building by its form and relationship to the street. Of course the design could be better but form is the foundation for good urbanism.

Its a shame that a building like this needs a zoning variance for density! Everyone needs to make it out to the Buffalo Green Code open houses the first week of June and ensure this madness dies with our old code.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This will look great!!!!

Score: 3 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Wouldn't it be stellar to see some townhouse infill (Main/Niagara/Elmwood): www.flickr.com/photos/rllayman/4135356735/

Or, maybe something with a little edge: www.archdaily.com/94591/building-115-graham-baba-architects

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

First I think people need to "get real" about how awesome Elmwood is. Now I moved here from a major city, so maybe the comparison isn't fair, but it's all I heard about as a "newbie", and, to be honest, it just isn't that great. Where I moved from there are a million versions of (a better) Elmwood. I can exhaust all that Elmwood has to offer in a hour. Plus, the traffic along it is horrid (I never drive on it anymore). The parking lot in question is A.) a pain in the butt to use and B.) ugly. Granted, the proposed building is nothing amazing and it does look like the building on the corner of Bryant and Elmwood -- but, right now, and for Buffalo, investment is investment. I do agree, though, that I hope it doesn't interfere with The Globe in any way - such a nice spot.

Score: 7 ( 31 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

An HOUR? That is quite the bar crawl. ; ).

replied to jzackosmith
Score: 7 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

An HOUR? That is quite the exaggeration.

replied to jzackosmith
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

He is exaggerating but he is correct on most points- Its Buffalo's Elmwood and its great for all of us, but that is all it is - I love living here but in any given city there are 10 Elmwoods and those 10 are probably more vibrant...Elmwood doesnt get the highend store wanting to move because of all of the people, food is good along elmwood, but good is pretty much where it stops- the bars are okay but not great and the people are spread thin with the limited places we have to go to in the first place.....Elmwood wants business and will take what it can get, not get what it wants and that is why we see pizza place after pizza place, cheap chinese, tattoo places and phone shops that go under....
We do have more than a few home grown clothing and accessory shops and that is nice but we still have a long way to go.........

replied to jzackosmith
Score: 8 ( 16 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"the bars are okay but not great"

What classifies a bar as "great"?

replied to elmdog
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's what you make of it. No, it doesn't "compare" to major, world-class cities on that front, but it offers something different, unique. I encourage you not to spend your time thinking about how it doesn't compare--but, instead, helping it be as great as it can be (which so, so many people are doing in Buffalo....which IS the city's greatness).

replied to jzackosmith
Score: 8 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I actually agree with you for once. When you come to Buffalo you dont fall in love with the City, you fall in love with the people. I've met many people that move here from DC, Philly, Orlando etc and at first their like, "this place sucks." But after a while the place grows on them and they tend to really like it for its cheap cost of living, good food and great people.

replied to Travelrrr
Score: 6 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That's not my experience. Anyone from out of town, that I have walked around with, (walking down Richmond from Symphony Circle to Forest, for example), falls in love with the physical aspects of the city, before they have met very many folks.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

That says something about you then!
just keeding!

replied to hamp
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Take them down Bailey or Grant and see what they say. There might be 4 or 5 nice parts of the City, other than that its pretty shotty. We get so obsesses around here with Elmwood because its our one go to spot. Other cities of similar size have numerous Elmwood avenue areas. Anyone that comes from an affluent part of a large city is not blown away but what we have, but they come to like the city for the people that live in it.

replied to hamp
Score: -1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Other cities of similar size have 10 Elmwoods"

Name some of those cities please?

replied to Up and coming
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

especially cities of similar size.

Chicago might have 10 Elmwoods, but they also have 10 times the people.

replied to TranspoGuy
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Exactly. Rochester is very close in size (metro area population) and they certainly don't have "10 Elmwoods." I can't really think of any cities of similar size (with similar metro populations) that do.

replied to 300miles
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Well... not American ones, anyway.

replied to TranspoGuy
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I live in(amazing) Fort Greene Brooklyn. Brooklyn alone has 10+ Elmwoods, Maybe 50 Elmwoods, not including the other 4 boroughs. That being said, it's one of the only cities in the country that I've lived in/traveled to(lots of them) that I've found "10 Elmwoods" or even close to that. Too many have zero Elmwoods. I still think Elmwood is pretty damn awesome. ...and again, I have quite possibly 50 of them within an easy biking distance and a solid three full Elmwood equivalents within a Wal-Mart parking lot's distance from my stoop(Myrtle, Fulton, Dekalb, etc). Elmwood is awesome. Just my opinion of course but I do live in the middle of the country's epicenter of proper urban density and vitality.

replied to jzackosmith
Score: 2 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I like that this development will be replacing a parking lot and hoping there are some exciting businesses to completely occupy the commercial space that both complement and add to the Elmwood flavor. Now if we could only get more development like this over in South Buffalo, perhaps Seneca Street,would make me very happy!

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Aiming low for project's sake. Hire a competent Architect!

Score: -1 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Am I the only one who thinks the design is boring and very cookie cutter? Especially if it doesnt have real brick on the outside. I can't really see this project making a huge impact on Elmwood. Especially when you walk up and down Elmwood and you pass empty store front, after empty store front around where Mode used to be.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thumbs down on this design. It looks very ordinary. I agree with the terra-cotta suggestion or tile work with brick. There should be something to distinguish the building. It has to be more than just a place to shop. "Oh, look dear they have a Gap on Elmwood now" Yuck
I don't agree that we should eliminate all our open spaces. Where should people who don't want to shop go to hang, c-n-b-seen.

Score: 2 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

People don't realize that for every one person walking down Elmwood there at 15 driving and you need parking spots. Just wait until parking starts spilling over onto the side streets and when people come home their parking half a block or more away from there house. People also seem to not understand that the availablity of parking is a "huge" determining factor for upper class citizens when they look for residential property in the city.

replied to Penn Station
Score: 8 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Upper class citizens can afford rent (as with this proposed building) on a place that comes with parking. Upper class (and even middle class) citizens can afford a house in the Elmwood Village with a driveway.

replied to Up and coming
Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Upper class citizens can afford rent (as with this proposed building) on a place that comes with parking." I'm not sure what that has to do with anything I said about parking? Also, the average Median income in Buffalo hovers around 30k, you'd need a lot more than that to afford a house/or rent between Richmond and Linwood.

replied to buff_roach
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm gonna have to park a 1/2 block, OR MORE AWAY?!?!?!?!?!?!?! You're right! I didn't realize that!!! Thank you for telling me!!!!!!!!!

OH MY #@%$#$% GOD!!! What is this? A CITY?!?!?!?!

You have got to be f'in kidding me - a $3.5 million development and we're worried that people might have to park a 1/2 block away?!

I guess I wouldn't know - my lower class ass has never rented an apartment with dedicated parking. And the 3,000 sqft house I purchased has zero parking.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 4 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I guess your lower class ass wouldn't know, lol. People pay for convenience. A very small demographic of people are going to drop 300k plus on a house where they either one, cant park in their drivway because they dont have one, or two have to struggle to find parking close to their house on a daily basis and those are just the facts.

replied to townline
Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

by your logic, irving place in allentown would have comparatively low property values, based on the fact that the houses are small, needy due to age, and most lack off-street parking. and they are burdened with preservation district restrictions.

and tacoma off hertel would have comparatively high values because of bigger, younger houses, 100% have driveways and garages, no preservation district restrictions.

but the reverse is true. so in reality, the market definitely disagrees with you.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 3 ( 13 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Houses in Allentown are only going for 95-145k and thats in one of the most "to be" spots in the city. Also, those streets do not have high street traffic so off street parking isnt a disaster. Think about this consider the poorest areas in the city and think of what they lack.....large off street parking and large lawns. Now thi k of the mansions built throughout the city and what do they have, large off street parking and large yards...coincidence, I think not.

replied to grad94
Score: 3 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This is just simply not true. The fringes of allentown - more on the lower west side, you might be looking at under $100K. But Irving, Park, Mariner, College, etc... are regularly getting well over $200K and often over $300k.

What are you basing your range on?

replied to Up and coming
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I actually just looked at two places on Mariner about two months ago and one was a full redo that sold for 140k and the other one was about the same price....strike two.

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

26 College 122k
50 College 143k
81 College 89k

......I think your comment of

"But Irving, Park, Mariner, College, etc... are regularly getting well over $200K and often over $300k."

......has been officially debunked.

replied to townline
Score: 0 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There were a couple on College asking 200 or close to it that just sold. I think his comment more applies with Irving and Park. What have those been selling for? I did a quick sample look at the city's page and didn't find many recent sales, but most properties had assessed values over 200 and from what I've seen those are generally low.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are plenty of $200k+ sales in Allentown to go along with your lower-priced examples.

Some recent sale prices on the streets townline mentioned (within the past three years):

120 College 280k
161 College 227k
114 Mariner 232k
130 Mariner 250k
141 Mariner 205k
22 Irving 219k
25 Irving 301k
56 Irving 245k
57 Irving 236k
60 Irving 260k
61 Irving 428k
74 Irving 380k
78 Irving 315k
41 Park 243k
111 Park 270k
133 Park 300k

Sale prices taken from public information at:
http://www.city-buffalo.com/files/1_2_1/city_departments/Assessment_Taxation/pdfs/bufsale_res_nbhd.pdf


replied to Up and coming
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Once again I harken back to my statement of.....

"A very small demographic of people are going to drop "300k" plus on a house where they either one, cant park in their drivway because they dont have one, or two have to struggle to find parking close to their house on a daily basis."

......also you being able to find 4 houses out of 100 (?) on 4 of the most desirable streets in Allentown, that sold for over 300k proves my point and debunks yours.....nice research though.

replied to JSmith
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

........also average that out with the block value of the rest of the homes and what do you get? Probably a block value with the 100k-150k range, once again reinforcing my comment.

replied to JSmith
Score: -1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I'm on the fringes of Allentown, right on the western border actually. Bought mine a year ago for 170, after improvements it'd likely go for over 200. Two doors down just sold for a bit lower and it wasn't anywhere near a full redo.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 0 ( 2 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

66 Mariner 150k
78 Mariner 140k
133 Mariner 179k

Also your assumption does nothing to disprove my point of...

"A very small demographic of people are going to drop 300k plus on a house where they either one, cant park in their drivway because they dont have one, or two have to struggle to find parking close to their house on a daily basis "

replied to LouisTully
Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Great project! Hope it starts soon.

Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There are two business mottos.
"location, Location, Location" and "build and they will come" as long as there is parking.

Look at Mulberry's ...odd location, plenty of parking, and a huge business.

Penzy Spices, searched for two years before picking Elmwood. Their other spots, Hertel or a mall in Orchard Park. They picked Elmwood....a section of Elmwood that has parking across the street. (please note: they did not pick the empty places of Frizlen projects at the other end of Elmwood with less parking....and the parking ramp for Children's ? no one uses it, for the limited shops in that area) Remember Pier One Imports? OH?? they are gone?? Wonder why?

Anyone that thinks that customers from the "outskirts" will be more than happy to search for parking that they may never find, walk several blocks in one of the wintery or rainy days we have, carry many shopping bags (hopefully), or the guy that has a hour or less for lunch, well; way less once he finds parking and walks several blocks to eat his lunch, or the woman who is spending $150 for hair color and a great blow out for a big night on the town, I am sure she won't mind dashing out to pay for her meter that is blocks away, Oh? and the elderly parent or grandparent that doesn't walk that well anymore, someone might want to take to lunch or dinner on Elmwood? ( I quess you can leave them at the front of the door while you search for awhile for a spot,lets hope they don't wander off) Needless to say this list can go on.

Frizlen will build, hopefully get paid and be on to another box. Benchmark, well they are claiming they have economic hardship and need to build this project....taller than what the Arocopolis wanted ?? but the same group of people that are against Acrocopolis want this building???? Benchmark will be able to continue building, because there will be plenty of vacant spots, more for Benchmark to bring in commerical chains like Panera's in the Block Buster spot.

It is just amazing to read some of the comments here??? I have no idea where some of this stuff would come from. Maybe no one has ever owned a business, been responsible for the paycheck of another man, never really have had to push their nose to the grind and look at how ever and anything that can make or destory your lively hood. And! actually make responible decisions.

Frizlen, Benchmark, Elmwood Village, and the city of Buffalo will have this attached to their names and not in a positive way.

I agree that Benchmark never took care of their property, that they let it be as ugly as possible. It is a shame that Elmwood Village, the city, and Benchmark did not have the ability to see that a parking lot that one would pay a rate to be there by the hour would have been the only and best solution. When business owners start to lose money, businesses goes down, What will ever one's comments be then??? knock everything done and continue with the strip mall concept? Is that what will make Elmwood Ave the place to be and live?
I can only sadly, imagine the insane advice some people would give.

Score: -4 ( 20 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I would love to see a Panera Bread (or, better, a Chipotle) in that BB space. Elmwood could use a couple more national chains as anchor tenants. It would also bring more students down from the surrounding campuses, especially buff state.

replied to businessowner
Score: 2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

We really don't need more SHOPPING on Elmwood, especially a national chain. That stretch from Ferry to Lafayette is getting dangerous its so crowded. There comes a point when density becomes overcrowding. There was a nice little cement park where Globe Market is now. Kids could hang out. Hakki-sac (sic) , etc. Seems the only measure of success is how much SHOPPING we can have.

replied to buff_roach
Score: -14 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The little park in front of Globe Market is not being removed by this project. I guess you are talking about before the Globe Market building was built? I don't remember it well, although I know people used to call it "Needle Park" because junkies would shoot up there.

Bidwell Parkway is less than 10 minutes from this location, and there are churches with big lawns at Ferry and Lafayette that probably wouldn't chase kids off for playing hacky sack. Plus there are sidewalk benches all around this area. It's one of the best areas of the city in terms of being a good public space to hang out.

But I actually agree with you that Buffalo needs more small public park spaces, though maybe not right on the main drags. Kind of hard to do it at this point, though, except in neighborhoods where demolitions have opened up some vacant lots.

replied to Penn Station
Score: 5 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Yes businessowner, of course you'd be against development next to your property, you're losing the availablity of free parking that you have counted on for years now, while never once thinking you should buy the proerty so nobody else would develop it. Elmwood needs density and development, not vacant lots that can be squated on for parking. As a business owner, you should be thrilled to have 24 new residences within walking distance of your front door. While the design is shabby if not poor, it is a positive that a vacant blight on the street will be infilled in a positive way, so for that good job Frizlen, Benchmark, Elmwood Village, and the city of Buffalo

replied to businessowner
Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

its evolutionary. the evolution from a parking based commercial strip to a density based strip will always leave winners and losers. there are many cities have thriving commercial strips in cold weather climates with limited available parking.

replied to businessowner
Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

How many apartments are planned for the upper 2 floors? The picture shows 2 units on each floor facing Elmwood, but how many more are in the design???? Probably should have been mentioned in the article as part of full disclosure.

Score: -1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's 24 apartments on the upper floors. Oversight on my part- I added it to the post.

replied to WarrenG
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment


I think that everyone is missing the bigger picture here. Elmwood village is a unique set of small shops, run by shopowners who primarily live and work it the area. That's what makes it unique and charming. Elmwood village is the opposite of national chains, like coffee coulture, blockbuster, now panara breads and god only knows which non-unique national Benchmark will bring in next, will it be lens crafter,a dollar store?

What is at issue here is the very fabric of Elmwood Village. Benchmark, Frisslin, and company brought in coffee coulture, blockbuster, and now panara breads. Are you starting to get the picture, they are the antithesis of Elmwood village. They do not work their shops or have a passion for the stores the elmwood ave. shop owners have long struggled to own and operate in their own special and dynamic way. THEY ARE CORPORATE. LOOK AT THEIR WEB SITE, OVER A BILLION DOLLARS IN ASSETS, THEIR PORFOLIO CONSISTS OF HOME DEPOTS AND LOWES, AND NATIONAL CHAIN TENANTS. They are not about Elmwood village. They are about making a profit and if neccesary at the expense of the shop owners, their employees, and the surrounding nieghborhood. To put it bluntly show me a Gelman who works in a shop in the village.
The whole purpose of our zoning in the Elwood district was to keep us quaint, not too big, not to corporate, not a franchise strip.
Ask your selvelves the obvious, is this about density, nonsense, the purpose of the zoning law was to avoid too much density, or is it about CORPOATE PREDATORY PROFIT AT THE EXPENSE OF THE SMALL GUY? Give them this variance and you will set the precedent, and they buy more buildings run the small unique shops out, and they will become national retail tenants as well, and Elmwood as we know it will be gone....wake up my friends.

replied to WCPerspective
Score: -5 ( 15 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

No. That is not the purpose of the design standards.

replied to concerncitzen
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You mean they really are bringing a Panera Bread to the Blockbuster space? That's fantastic and we should celebrate this.

Elmwood Village would have been an ideal area for a Corner Bakery Cafe--but that opened on Transit Road (some corner bakery)!

I don't see any reason why small businesses can't thrive next to national chains, especially if design standards preclude anything too big. I bet the Small Business Owner who is complaining about the loss of parking will benefit in one way or another from the young couple who had to park a few blocks away and walk in front of his or her business in order to get their Pick Twos from Panera.

This is all good.

And jzackosmith, how many of these million places like Elmwood are within walking distance from beautiful expansive parks (where you could watch Shakespeare in the park--and that will last longer than an hour), world-class museums, college campuses, and architectural wonders?

replied to concerncitzen
Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You had me until corporate, predatory profit at the expense of the small guy. Noone is forcing people to shop or work at 'corporate, predatory' places. Isnt what you speak of just the evolution of a city? There is comparatively no national presence in buffalo, and if we were to 'evolve' the way bigger cities have, It would probably begin on Elmwood because that's where the people are. I love the local spots but I'm also rooting for buffalo to be a city, not a village.

replied to concerncitzen
Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Look at unique villages in other cities. Do you see a Panaro Bread in Niagara on the lake, Yorkville in Toronto, or Soho in New York. The answer is no. Whoever is dumb enough to celebrate the arrival of franchises in our village, is celebrating the demise of Elmwood Village for their own selfish reason Do you work for Benchmark? I suppose you are are in favor of a payless shoe store as well. Like I said wake up! And to the individual who said "why didn't the business owners buy it" the answer is Benchmark bought the property which was assessed for 44k and put it on the market for one million bucks. The reality is it was never really on the market. Anybody starting to smell corporate greed?

Score: -14 ( 18 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You can't be serious. Yorkville is upscale and is nothing but chains (and it's a smaller area, and much more defined area, than the Elmwood Village).

Soho has a Whole Foods. Among many other chains.

Minneapolis has a Panera Bread on Hennepin, not far from UMN

Starbucks on Elmwood did not lead to the bankruptcy of Spot or Aroma.

replied to concerncitzen
Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I take it you'd be displeased with a Wal Mart supercenter in Elmwood...

replied to concerncitzen
Score: 4 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Groce. Do not want.

Score: -1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"What's all this I hear about Panera in Blockbuster??"
-- Emily Litella


No seriously... is that in the works?

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Here's this morning's Buffalo News article about this issue. It kind of hints at it ("A restaurant chain that is said to have the inside track could pose a threat to Globe Market across the street") but doesn't identify the prospective tenants for the Blockbuster space.

http://www.buffalonews.com/city/communities/buffalo/article869680.ece

replied to 300miles
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Globe is always packed when I go there for lunch--have to share tables with strangers (and that's what is great about Buffalo).

However, I don't know what a Panera would do to their business. But like many other businesses (India Gate, Spot, etc.) they are expanding by setting up a location on Hertel. I really believe that small businesses will thrive even under the shadow of a national chain. It's simply becoming more of a destination for more people.

But if they don't survive, there is always Hertel which is undergoing massive gentrification.

Perhaps one solution is rent control--to make it possible for small businesses to stay on the strip; but do they even do that for retail?

replied to JSmith
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I think part of the solution is new buildings like this. New buildings command higher rents, both because people like to be in a shiny new space and because the landlords need to charge high rents to pay off the construction cost. This is turn pushes down rents in older buildings, which are then available for lower-income renters and lower-margin businesses.

That's why Jane Jacobs wrote about how important it is for cities to have a good mix of new and old buildings. The new buildings support the wealthier people and businesses and the older buildings (which the new buildings will one day become) provide opportunities for less wealthy people and for start-ups, etc. So it's also important that we don't tear down all of our old buildings and end up only with new expensive ones.

replied to buff_roach
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"Infill" as you folks call it is more pleasing to the eye, but personally, I'd rather have a reliable place to park when I go to Globe Market and East Meets West Yoga.

Score: 3 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I have never parked more than a 1/2 block from my destination anywhere in Buffalo.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 4 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

steel>"I have never parked more than a 1/2 block from my destination anywhere in Buffalo."
http/google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOaw>"I have also never parked more than a block away from a business"

Hmmm, I don't know what kind of lucky magical space-finding talents you two might have or how often you go there at busy times, but for sure there have been times - even with that parking lot still there (and full) - when I've had to park on Ashland or some other side street and ended up at least 2 or 3 blocks from where I'm going.

Before anyone gives the "real city" lecture, I didn't consider it a problem for me (didn't keep me from doing it obviously)...
but then again, I'm not coming out of hot yoga all sweaty in the middle of winter like bps might be, or many other reasons people might want to be parked closer than 2 city blocks to a destination - again, especially in winter, &/or after dark, &/or maybe when people are dragging along toddlers, or elderly, etc.

If this project gets city approval as it should, then if other businesses still want that amount of parking spaces they should proactively collaborate and try to find a way to make it happen. As Bini pointed out, businesses have been benefiting without permission from a parking lot owned by Benchmark for their tenants.

If replacement parking turns out to not be feasible, they always have the option of moving if they see their customer levels fall or have good reason to expect it.
In the Buffalo News today, even Benchmark expressed concern about reduced parking around there, although outweighed by their goals for the new building. Maybe they'll end up trying to help replace the spaces somewhere.

While I strongly favor allowing the property owner to do this project, if any of you are denying that the generally-increased distance of customer parking availability around there could have any bad impact to any of the businesses - that would seem narrow minded.

replied to STEEL
Score: 4 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

He lives in Chicago. He's quite the expert on parking from all those shopping trips out to Northbrook and Gurnee Mills! :)

replied to whatever
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

lol. That sure is good reason to stop a $3.5 million development. Convenient parking so I can get to my exercise.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 4 ( 10 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

It's not just about the convenient location of parking, but how long it takes to find it. There are many times when I cannot find parking in Elmwood within a reasonable time frame.

replied to townline
Score: 2 ( 6 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Then you ought to find an alternate location for your shopping and yoga practice. There are plenty of options in north buf and the suburbs that you can park right next too with certainty, every time. Lack of parking is rarely a deterrent, I doubt most people who like to come to EV is not going to be less likely to come when the neighborhood is more vibrant.

replied to BPS_Rising
Score: 1 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Enjoy exercising when its below 30 degrees.

replied to townline
Score: -3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i once read a designer who argued that lovability is essential for sustainability. if a building is not lovable, people will not take care of it and it will get thrown away.

obviously, this is not a 100% guarantee. the beth steel administration building is unusually lovable and it is being sent to a landfill.

but i think the argument is still sound. we worked very hard to keep our most lovable buildings out of landfills: guaranty, shea's, martin house, coit house, richardson complex, and so on.

my take is that frizlen's work meets the bare minimum for adequate urbanism but goes no further. it is far from lovable. catherine faust, on the other hand, now there's a designer who ought to be getting more commissions on elmwood. she did toro and empire grill. great stuff, and, well, lovable.

Score: 3 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Nothing sticks out about Toro or Empire Grill either.

replied to grad94
Score: -2 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

i beg to differ. the curved corner at empire grill is marvelous. the parapet at toro (if i have the right word) is also really good. ornament makes you care about a building. lack or ornament makes you tolerate a building.

replied to Up and coming
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This building is so bland, it's like replacing one blank spot on Elmwood with another. No wait, actually, I think I prefer the look of the parking lot.

Score: -4 ( 14 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Thanks for more great news, Mike. Slowly but surely a critical mass is evolving: In Elmwood village and Buffalo Medical Campus. Allentown at Main is ready for major resurgence as well. Wish I owned property there. More people living in the city. gotta love it! I live in the near suburbs and two of my neighbors are selling their home for city life. I'm jealous. Keep 'em coming for world class living in a world class medical and education city.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

IT'S NOT A F*@$)*G VILLAGE!!! lol

replied to DOC
Score: -2 ( 12 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I don't know why people are so down on Frizlen's work. Is it bland because it doesn't have some bizarre glass corkscrew cantilevered over the sidewalk? Or windows shaped like figure-eights? Maybe it should be shaped like an off-balance stack of pyramids?

I think this building is just fine for a run-of-the-mill commercial building. The proportions look good to me. Admittedly, I have an amateur's eye, not professional training, but I can recognize the badly-proportioned cartoon architecture that makes up most modern commercial buildings (e.g., Delaware or Elmwood Avenue in North Buffalo, Niagara Falls Boulevard, Transit Road, etc.). This is so much better than the norm.

It is built to the property line, with no useless shrubs or two foot grass strip in front. The windows aren't tinted black. It doesn't endanger pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers with multiple curb cuts. It finds a clever way to include parking for the residential tenants without allowing that parking to negatively impact on Elmwood Avenue.

The only things I dislike about it are the potential use of EIFS (I don't know if that's what it actually is, or if it's natural stucco), and that a bit of understated ornamental brickwork would be nice and not necessarily that expensive, I would think. I agree that it is plain, but I just don't think it's that big of a problem compared to the many things this design does right.

Really, I can't think of any other local architects who do new building designs that consistently get the basics of urban design correct. What more do we want?

Score: 7 ( 11 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

From the Buffalo News:

"A parking study done several years ago confirmed that a long-term solution is needed, because demand outweighs supply in the popular shopping district, said Rebecca L. Gandour, interim executive director. But more than the project’s loss of parking needs to be taken into account, she said."

This here is the usual "solution". Knock down enough buildings for parking and eventually the the demand will be lowered to meet the supply. In pretty much every area of Buffalo this was used it has resulted in a faus-suburbia which cannot compete with that large scale automobile driven development. Most of these strips have been on a continual slide.

The removal of this unplanned surface lot exposed to the main drag is good. The lack of proper hidden lots remains and should be studied. They should be pay lots with money in dedicated funds to street improvement.

I have also never parked more than a block away from a business. No different than the Galleria in the busy seasons. I also get to walk past, and go into, other businesses I never would have paid attention to otherwise.

We become conditioned that the "asphalt jungle" is the no-brainer replacement for the concrete jungle. A whole new generation of residents is voting with their dollars that pure convenience isn't really all that more convenient and results in an unpleasant public realm to live and interact in.

Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I live in Lincoln Park, Chicago and can tell you people do not care what the buildings look like for shops, restaurants, bars, etc. You can put a Starbucks in a rundown shack and it will still succeed in the right area. Every single new building built or being built in the Bucktown/Wicker Park neighborhoods here look like this project, if it's good enough for Chicago why can't it be good enough for Buffalo?

Score: 5 ( 9 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

I couldn't agree more. I bet if the architect added a little old-fashioned entablature or any molding at the top of the building, all these snarky comments would subside. Otherwise, I just don't know what more people want. Laser beams? A one-story, salt-water fish tank on top, with dolphins jumping around in the summer? Sheesh.

replied to sabres77
Score: 3 ( 3 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Because Buffalo is special.

replied to sabres77
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

You know in most large cities six blocks from a subway stop would be considered walkable and is reflected in the upscale rents. However, in Buffalo, two blocks is considered too far to walk.

Score: 5 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

very true. i live 7 blocks from high traffic subway in NYC and its very convenient. What's the worst thing a few block walk can do to you, tighten you gut?

replied to saltecks
Score: 2 ( 4 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

True, but Buffalo is not other big cities. There is no subway along Elmwood. Most folks don't use public transportation the same way here. There is far less street life (food carts, street musicians, patio space, etc.). Most winters, it's pretty darn cold much of the year. Parallel parking vs. angled-in parking on a two lane street makes parking more challenging during busy hours.

replied to saltecks
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This just in:

@BeseckerBN

Zoning Board takes no action on mixed-use project at 766 Elmwood. Waiting for Planning Board to do enviro review.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

this debate is really about a very basic question: what is a city for? is its primary purpose to be automobile habitat or human habitat? pick one, because you can't have it both ways. great car places are murder to walk in. literally. remember the cynthia wiggins case?

great people places are murder to park in. figuratively, not literally. you might not find a free spot right up against your destination. my point, of course, is that paying a few bucks more to park or walking a block or two to your destination is not equivalent to vehicular manslaughter. but we act like it is high treason.

Score: 8 ( 8 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

As an infill building its ok. If they start tarring things down to put up this stuff that’s a problem. Can one say Pano’s . Most national chains haven’t worked. They want tax breaks big parking or a drive through. That’s why you don’t see the King, Colonel, or the Clown, Pier One… Business should be happy to have 24 to 50+ new customers with money at their doorstep. Go to any real city and parking and the cost of parking is much worse, people adapt. The parking excuse I get tired of hearing it. Go to Kenmore there’s tons of parking and empty storefronts to.

Score: 1 ( 5 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

The right idea but the wrong design. No dry-vit and no veneers should be allowed. This is simply a cheap building. EVA must wake up and assert a strong vision for quality design and construction on Elmwood Avnue. Every recent building on the strip has been cheaply built and undeviatingly dull.
Why do we settle for this?

Score: 1 ( 7 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

This reminds me of a development I wake up next to unbeknownst: she's built to the curb but plain. Where are the dry-vit ladies.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

There went my hopes for the Place de La Concorde here...

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

"There are plenty of $200k+ sales in Allentown to go along with your lower-priced examples.

Some recent sale prices on the streets townline mentioned (within the past three years):

120 College 280k
161 College 227k
114 Mariner 232k
130 Mariner 250k
141 Mariner 205k
22 Irving 219k
25 Irving 301k
56 Irving 245k
57 Irving 236k
60 Irving 260k
61 Irving 428k
74 Irving 380k
78 Irving 315k
41 Park 243k
111 Park 270k
133 Park 300k"

Thank you SO much for posting this. I hate when people try to argue with me that Allentown is "affordable" for average Buffalonians. On what planet? Some people clearly have a skewed view of what constitutes the average Buffalonian - $40k income for a FAMILY is average, $27k average for a single person. Who the H can afford a $800-1000+ house payment on that, before they pay any utilities or grocery bills? Also, off street parking is NO problem in Black Rock, despite people's assumptions about "poor neighborhoods". 90% of the houses in my area have off street parking and many (like mine) actually have large driveways and garages, which is why there are many homeowners in my area (as opposed to the rotating cast of college kid renters I saw at my friends' apartment building in Allentown). $437 house payment, super quiet, LOADS of shopping, restaurants, access to Delaware and Riverside Park all within 2 miles.

Elmwood Village was fun when I was 22 and there was an artsy, alt vibe there (and I didn't mind the constant crowding and noise). Now it is 70% Urban Outfitter clones that have a crap attitude about EVERYTHING that doesn't 100% fit their agenda (because part of being a hipster is having your ideals never agree with anyone else - if they like x you like y, if they like y you like z). The cooler-than-thou p+ssing contest is lame when you are nearing 30, folks. I like to shop there and eat there, occasionally, and it is nice to see how vibrant it still is but more and more I notice empty store fronts and absurd rent. It has become a victim of its own success in many ways. A lot of times it isn't worth the hassle of finding parking when Hertel is so much closer to my house and is closer to the practical businesses I shop at for groceries, hardware, etc. Being a slave to hip areas ruins your wallet and limits your feel for the city as a whole.

To actually comment on point that building is super boring, and there are other buildings on Elmwood that are empty or in need of renovation that could serve the same purpose. I'm unsure why 100 years ago, when practicality was everything, buildings still came out gorgeous and unique but now in the era of excess we make the most boring, ugly structures (see most of the new build houses in the suburbs). However, I'm never against infill on principle. I'd just like to see places like this put more thought into design and parking for shoppers, not just residents. Plus, if Elmwood Village had any affordable grocery stores (other than Price Rite, which is far from this area) 7-11 wouldn't be so popular.

Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

moonqueen> I'm unsure why 100 years ago, when practicality was everything, buildings still came out gorgeous and unique but now in the era of excess we make the most boring, ugly structures (see most of the new build houses in the suburbs).

Granularity of the construction materials used. It makes it easier to incorporate human-scale elements at minimal cost. Also, in inflation-adjusted dollars, skilled and unskilled construction labor was much cheaper.

If the architects and builders if the late 1800s and early 1900s had drywall, tilt-up concrete, and the like, they would have used them.

Also, there's the survivor boas phenomenon. The better constructed, more attractive, and better located buildings had a much better chance of surviving through the years than the marginal vernacular structures. Buffalo had more than its fair share of poorly constructed, ugly buildings built during its glory years. Not everything built before 1929 was some over-engineered architectural masterpiece.

replied to moonqueen
Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Agree that much of the best has survived, this is especially true of the earliest homes and buildings. My Federal Style house is about 2200 sq ft and was considered large for the period (1830). Many early homes here in Black Rock started out as small as 16'x20', a common type before the Civil War. Most were expanded or replaced by larger homes during the Victorian era.

As for the quality of construction in the past, there was a sense of pride and permanence that is not the case today. Building owners wanted to make a statement, they had a personal stake in the outcome and many saw their buildings as a legacy. There is no such personal connection today, buildings reflect the corporate culture of expediency and short term use. I doubt most architects and builders of the past would embrace dryvit or the other cheap imitation materials, they had a much greater respect for quality and endurance.

replied to Dan
Score: 1 ( 1 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

looks good

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Less parking lots are good, but why do people get so excited over a business? I guess because Buffalo is losing so many. Build all you like, Elmwood avenue (not a village!) is a dull, uninteresting place.

Score: 0 ( 0 votes ) Vote up Vote down Report this comment

Leave a comment